<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Iraqi troops running, not standing up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-troops-running-not-standing-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-troops-running-not-standing-up/</link>
	<description>The Wichita Eagle Editorial Department Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 07:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: CapnAmerica</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-troops-running-not-standing-up/#comment-333829</link>
		<dc:creator>CapnAmerica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 15:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-troops-running-not-standing-up/#comment-333829</guid>
		<description>Boxlock--

Thanks for the evasive answer.  I take that as a yes, although when people get laid off, they tend to get sicker, so if you're selling medical equip., you might be doing okay.

I have the kind of a job in which job layoffs and a slow economy actually creates demand.

So . . . we're doing great under Worst. President. Ever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boxlock&#8211;</p>
<p>Thanks for the evasive answer.  I take that as a yes, although when people get laid off, they tend to get sicker, so if you&#8217;re selling medical equip., you might be doing okay.</p>
<p>I have the kind of a job in which job layoffs and a slow economy actually creates demand.</p>
<p>So . . . we&#8217;re doing great under Worst. President. Ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CapnAmerica</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-troops-running-not-standing-up/#comment-333828</link>
		<dc:creator>CapnAmerica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 15:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-troops-running-not-standing-up/#comment-333828</guid>
		<description>Boxlock: &lt;i&gt;To blame Republicans for a lack of Republican national elected office holders is simple minded, as Blacks themselves ridicule and denigrate their own that would even try&lt;/i&gt;.

Ah, I see it now.  The scales have fallen from my eyes.  Blacks are simply too &lt;i&gt;stupid&lt;/i&gt; to vote Republican.

Thanks for clearing that up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boxlock: <i>To blame Republicans for a lack of Republican national elected office holders is simple minded, as Blacks themselves ridicule and denigrate their own that would even try</i>.</p>
<p>Ah, I see it now.  The scales have fallen from my eyes.  Blacks are simply too <i>stupid</i> to vote Republican.</p>
<p>Thanks for clearing that up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CapnAmerica</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-troops-running-not-standing-up/#comment-333827</link>
		<dc:creator>CapnAmerica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 15:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-troops-running-not-standing-up/#comment-333827</guid>
		<description>Boxlock--

One word: &lt;i&gt;paragraphs&lt;/i&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boxlock&#8211;</p>
<p>One word: <i>paragraphs</i>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fiore_Buccieri</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-troops-running-not-standing-up/#comment-333733</link>
		<dc:creator>Fiore_Buccieri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 11:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-troops-running-not-standing-up/#comment-333733</guid>
		<description>"This involved a few dozen soldiers."

And the morale problem this can create spreads well beyond only a few dozen soldiers. It's why cowardice and desertion of one's post in battle are dealt with so severely in most armies, including ours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;This involved a few dozen soldiers.&#8221;</p>
<p>And the morale problem this can create spreads well beyond only a few dozen soldiers. It&#8217;s why cowardice and desertion of one&#8217;s post in battle are dealt with so severely in most armies, including ours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RobertL</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-troops-running-not-standing-up/#comment-333530</link>
		<dc:creator>RobertL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 02:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-troops-running-not-standing-up/#comment-333530</guid>
		<description>This involved a few dozen soldiers. The New York Times played it page one because it fits their narrative about Iraq.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This involved a few dozen soldiers. The New York Times played it page one because it fits their narrative about Iraq.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WSClark</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-troops-running-not-standing-up/#comment-333527</link>
		<dc:creator>WSClark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 02:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-troops-running-not-standing-up/#comment-333527</guid>
		<description>"When every Iraqi sucks George’s dick and blows oil out of his/her ass, we will have won."

Is it too late to ask you to go away and not come back, Door King?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;When every Iraqi sucks George’s dick and blows oil out of his/her ass, we will have won.&#8221;</p>
<p>Is it too late to ask you to go away and not come back, Door King?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beber</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-troops-running-not-standing-up/#comment-333503</link>
		<dc:creator>beber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 01:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-troops-running-not-standing-up/#comment-333503</guid>
		<description>Just thought you girlyboys would like to know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just thought you girlyboys would like to know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beber</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-troops-running-not-standing-up/#comment-333502</link>
		<dc:creator>beber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 01:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-troops-running-not-standing-up/#comment-333502</guid>
		<description>When every Iraqi sucks George's dick and blows oil out of his/her ass, we will have won.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When every Iraqi sucks George&#8217;s dick and blows oil out of his/her ass, we will have won.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pedant</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-troops-running-not-standing-up/#comment-333452</link>
		<dc:creator>Pedant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 22:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-troops-running-not-standing-up/#comment-333452</guid>
		<description>No doubt, Square Peg.

Nobody, not even Bush, knows what we're funding over there.  Nobody, and I mean nobody, knows what our goal is in Iraq.  What angers many Democrats so strongly, in fact, is that Republics accuse them of cowardice, treason, wanting to cut and run, etc., yet Republics have absolutely no clue what winning in Iraq means.  It's easy to see that their idea of winning is this: we win when a Republic president tells us we win, and not before.

So we squander billions in Iraq, we perversely question the patriotism of Americans who ask what we're borrowing to spend on in Iraq (as if this is some kind of low treason), yet nobody -- NOT ONE AMERICAN -- can tell us what "winning" there means.

And about a third of voting Americans think Augustus Stupidus is a frickin visionary, a modern American prophet in fact, for putting us in this position.  

it is beyond all definition of bizarre.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No doubt, Square Peg.</p>
<p>Nobody, not even Bush, knows what we&#8217;re funding over there.  Nobody, and I mean nobody, knows what our goal is in Iraq.  What angers many Democrats so strongly, in fact, is that Republics accuse them of cowardice, treason, wanting to cut and run, etc., yet Republics have absolutely no clue what winning in Iraq means.  It&#8217;s easy to see that their idea of winning is this: we win when a Republic president tells us we win, and not before.</p>
<p>So we squander billions in Iraq, we perversely question the patriotism of Americans who ask what we&#8217;re borrowing to spend on in Iraq (as if this is some kind of low treason), yet nobody &#8212; NOT ONE AMERICAN &#8212; can tell us what &#8220;winning&#8221; there means.</p>
<p>And about a third of voting Americans think Augustus Stupidus is a frickin visionary, a modern American prophet in fact, for putting us in this position.  </p>
<p>it is beyond all definition of bizarre.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SquarePeg</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-troops-running-not-standing-up/#comment-333445</link>
		<dc:creator>SquarePeg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 22:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-troops-running-not-standing-up/#comment-333445</guid>
		<description>Is there anybody capable of stating, in one or two clear sentences, what "winning"  means inn Iraq?

And if you can,  then could you share it with George Bush?  Cause he she the hell doesnt know what it means!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there anybody capable of stating, in one or two clear sentences, what &#8220;winning&#8221;  means inn Iraq?</p>
<p>And if you can,  then could you share it with George Bush?  Cause he she the hell doesnt know what it means!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SquarePeg</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-troops-running-not-standing-up/#comment-333444</link>
		<dc:creator>SquarePeg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 22:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-troops-running-not-standing-up/#comment-333444</guid>
		<description>You're strange,  don johnson  --  very  strange..  a  new troll,  I do  believe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re strange,  don johnson  &#8212;  very  strange..  a  new troll,  I do  believe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: donjohnson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-troops-running-not-standing-up/#comment-333442</link>
		<dc:creator>donjohnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 22:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-troops-running-not-standing-up/#comment-333442</guid>
		<description>Ladies and Gentlemen this is tuff stuff, but as you all know we are Americans. We are the ones paying for this because we as Americans stand together and history shows this and i will say one more time we Americans stand together In the end. Now back to the anal group in washington can someone answer this for me here now when you read this. Are the people in Americas leadership being Americans? I just don't have a answer without going to a very low place with this to many words to type. Semper fi.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ladies and Gentlemen this is tuff stuff, but as you all know we are Americans. We are the ones paying for this because we as Americans stand together and history shows this and i will say one more time we Americans stand together In the end. Now back to the anal group in washington can someone answer this for me here now when you read this. Are the people in Americas leadership being Americans? I just don&#8217;t have a answer without going to a very low place with this to many words to type. Semper fi.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Regular</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-troops-running-not-standing-up/#comment-333422</link>
		<dc:creator>Regular</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 21:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-troops-running-not-standing-up/#comment-333422</guid>
		<description>Some pretty famous Black Republicans in the areas of Civil Rights, Women Rights and Abolition. :)

Eldridge Cleaver
Frederick Douglass
James L. Farmer, Jr.
Roy Innis - founder of C.O.R.E.
James Meredith
Jesse Lee Peterson
Sojourner Truth</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some pretty famous Black Republicans in the areas of Civil Rights, Women Rights and Abolition. <img src='http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Eldridge Cleaver<br />
Frederick Douglass<br />
James L. Farmer, Jr.<br />
Roy Innis - founder of C.O.R.E.<br />
James Meredith<br />
Jesse Lee Peterson<br />
Sojourner Truth</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boxlock</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-troops-running-not-standing-up/#comment-333416</link>
		<dc:creator>Boxlock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 21:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-troops-running-not-standing-up/#comment-333416</guid>
		<description>2FCK,
Oh how easy it is to get you blindingly hysterical over pointing out when you make stupid mistakes and won't, can't, even admit it.  One would think you would learn to relax and maintain control a little better as many mistakes as you do make.  You go completely ballistic also when someone points out your either racism and/or hate for conservative Republicans that causes you to make a laughable fool of yourself.
I never called myself a racist, interchanging 'are' and 'aren't' was a simple speed mistake when trying to type between, and even during, frequent phone calls that I am doing as I work and type.  And I immediately saw it and corrected, but that's all you have to hang onto to argue, sad.
You are simply an amusement for me 2FCK here at my desk.  But even amusements lose their novelty and ability to hold interest eventually, as conversing with you has long ago, so as much as you'll miss me I have better things to do than continue with this line.  Besides, it's time to go.
So don't forget your lesson for today...there have been lots of African-Americans elected to national office, there have been lots of Black Republicans elected to other political offices, there have been lots of Black Americans appointed to the highest offices by Republicans.  To blame Republicans for a lack of Republican national elected office holders is simple minded, as Blacks themselves ridicule and denigrate their own that would even try  The Republican party has tried to encourage Blacks to run for office but with limited success.  That's not the fault of the party.  Remember, the Dems vote too, and national offices are voted on by both parties, so it's not just the Republicans.  It unfortunately boils down to largely a matter of too many listening to the lies of the Dems and unfortunately not looking at history and the facts.  Keep trying, you may eventually learn.  Maybe we can have class tomorrow too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2FCK,<br />
Oh how easy it is to get you blindingly hysterical over pointing out when you make stupid mistakes and won&#8217;t, can&#8217;t, even admit it.  One would think you would learn to relax and maintain control a little better as many mistakes as you do make.  You go completely ballistic also when someone points out your either racism and/or hate for conservative Republicans that causes you to make a laughable fool of yourself.<br />
I never called myself a racist, interchanging &#8216;are&#8217; and &#8216;aren&#8217;t&#8217; was a simple speed mistake when trying to type between, and even during, frequent phone calls that I am doing as I work and type.  And I immediately saw it and corrected, but that&#8217;s all you have to hang onto to argue, sad.<br />
You are simply an amusement for me 2FCK here at my desk.  But even amusements lose their novelty and ability to hold interest eventually, as conversing with you has long ago, so as much as you&#8217;ll miss me I have better things to do than continue with this line.  Besides, it&#8217;s time to go.<br />
So don&#8217;t forget your lesson for today&#8230;there have been lots of African-Americans elected to national office, there have been lots of Black Republicans elected to other political offices, there have been lots of Black Americans appointed to the highest offices by Republicans.  To blame Republicans for a lack of Republican national elected office holders is simple minded, as Blacks themselves ridicule and denigrate their own that would even try  The Republican party has tried to encourage Blacks to run for office but with limited success.  That&#8217;s not the fault of the party.  Remember, the Dems vote too, and national offices are voted on by both parties, so it&#8217;s not just the Republicans.  It unfortunately boils down to largely a matter of too many listening to the lies of the Dems and unfortunately not looking at history and the facts.  Keep trying, you may eventually learn.  Maybe we can have class tomorrow too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CF2K</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-troops-running-not-standing-up/#comment-333377</link>
		<dc:creator>CF2K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 19:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-troops-running-not-standing-up/#comment-333377</guid>
		<description>Boxlock,

And if you didn't mean to call YOURSELF a racist, why did you do so?  Your argument against me works perfectly well against you.  To a 'T', in fact.  You have NO ANSWER.

I meant to say EXACTLY what I said, and what I said was ABSOLUTELY clear to any honest hearer--that is, to anyone who grants that I do, in fact, know the racial and ideological characteristics of the Bush Administration's appointees.  To a dishonest hearer, such as yourself, it was not clear, whether through honesty or malice I cannot say.  I suspect malice.

Regarding the claim that my invective toward you was racist...how, precisely?  Perhaps in Republican world, where calling out a white racist--like you, Boxlock--is the only thing that counts as a "racist" act.

Given your expressed attitudes of racial prejudice and racial hostility, Boxlock, you are utterly discredited as a source of definitions as to what does and doesn't constitute racism.

The Republican Party has NO elected officials serving in a national office.  NOT ONE.  No African-American Republican has served in national ELECTIVE office since J.C. Watts left the House in 2003.  Think maybe it has something to do with the Republican Party become the home of white southern racists?

And it is UTTERLY racist of you to assert, Boxlock, that African-Americans are so stupid that they can't see past the Democrats' "false promises" to vote Republican.  Honestly.  

"There have been several Blacks who have been elected to public office over the years, by the way."  Many more than "several," the vast, vast majority of them Democrats.  Here's a list.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African_Americans_in_the_United_States_Congress

Your racism ranges from patronizing dismissal to outright villification.  It is the perfect complement to your argumentative dishonesty and willful inconsistency.

You don't know what you don't know, Boxlock.  That must be a painful thing to admit for someone of your advanced years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boxlock,</p>
<p>And if you didn&#8217;t mean to call YOURSELF a racist, why did you do so?  Your argument against me works perfectly well against you.  To a &#8216;T&#8217;, in fact.  You have NO ANSWER.</p>
<p>I meant to say EXACTLY what I said, and what I said was ABSOLUTELY clear to any honest hearer&#8211;that is, to anyone who grants that I do, in fact, know the racial and ideological characteristics of the Bush Administration&#8217;s appointees.  To a dishonest hearer, such as yourself, it was not clear, whether through honesty or malice I cannot say.  I suspect malice.</p>
<p>Regarding the claim that my invective toward you was racist&#8230;how, precisely?  Perhaps in Republican world, where calling out a white racist&#8211;like you, Boxlock&#8211;is the only thing that counts as a &#8220;racist&#8221; act.</p>
<p>Given your expressed attitudes of racial prejudice and racial hostility, Boxlock, you are utterly discredited as a source of definitions as to what does and doesn&#8217;t constitute racism.</p>
<p>The Republican Party has NO elected officials serving in a national office.  NOT ONE.  No African-American Republican has served in national ELECTIVE office since J.C. Watts left the House in 2003.  Think maybe it has something to do with the Republican Party become the home of white southern racists?</p>
<p>And it is UTTERLY racist of you to assert, Boxlock, that African-Americans are so stupid that they can&#8217;t see past the Democrats&#8217; &#8220;false promises&#8221; to vote Republican.  Honestly.  </p>
<p>&#8220;There have been several Blacks who have been elected to public office over the years, by the way.&#8221;  Many more than &#8220;several,&#8221; the vast, vast majority of them Democrats.  Here&#8217;s a list.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African_Americans_in_the_United_States_Congress" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African_Americans_in_the_United_States_Congress</a></p>
<p>Your racism ranges from patronizing dismissal to outright villification.  It is the perfect complement to your argumentative dishonesty and willful inconsistency.</p>
<p>You don&#8217;t know what you don&#8217;t know, Boxlock.  That must be a painful thing to admit for someone of your advanced years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boxlock</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-troops-running-not-standing-up/#comment-333367</link>
		<dc:creator>Boxlock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 18:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-troops-running-not-standing-up/#comment-333367</guid>
		<description>Capn,
Haven't seen any reduction really, though it varies month to month of course.
For your info., my income is derived 100% from commissions and I pay 100% of my expenses.  I pull my own weight in society and then some.
How about you....Capn???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Capn,<br />
Haven&#8217;t seen any reduction really, though it varies month to month of course.<br />
For your info., my income is derived 100% from commissions and I pay 100% of my expenses.  I pull my own weight in society and then some.<br />
How about you&#8230;.Capn???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CapnAmerica</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-troops-running-not-standing-up/#comment-333362</link>
		<dc:creator>CapnAmerica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 18:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-troops-running-not-standing-up/#comment-333362</guid>
		<description>How're sales after seven years of your man Bush running the country, Boxlock?

Kinda slow, huh.

Sure hope you don't work on commission . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How&#8217;re sales after seven years of your man Bush running the country, Boxlock?</p>
<p>Kinda slow, huh.</p>
<p>Sure hope you don&#8217;t work on commission . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boxlock</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-troops-running-not-standing-up/#comment-333347</link>
		<dc:creator>Boxlock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 18:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-troops-running-not-standing-up/#comment-333347</guid>
		<description>Capn,
Crawl back in your hole, it's not dark enough out for scavengers yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Capn,<br />
Crawl back in your hole, it&#8217;s not dark enough out for scavengers yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathaniel</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-troops-running-not-standing-up/#comment-333337</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathaniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 18:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-troops-running-not-standing-up/#comment-333337</guid>
		<description>It does disgust me that this company would withdrawl from battle.

I think the point which needs to be made is that it was one individual leader who took them out of the battle and not simply the Iraqi soldiers who quit.

That officer needs to be fired and disciplined.

However, there were still many other units of the Iraqi military which stayed and fought.

I do hope this situation is dealth with appropriately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It does disgust me that this company would withdrawl from battle.</p>
<p>I think the point which needs to be made is that it was one individual leader who took them out of the battle and not simply the Iraqi soldiers who quit.</p>
<p>That officer needs to be fired and disciplined.</p>
<p>However, there were still many other units of the Iraqi military which stayed and fought.</p>
<p>I do hope this situation is dealth with appropriately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Regular</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-troops-running-not-standing-up/#comment-333327</link>
		<dc:creator>Regular</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 18:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-troops-running-not-standing-up/#comment-333327</guid>
		<description>Ahhh,

If I want to feel totally rotten and dismal, all I have to do is come here to the WE Blog and read what Liberal Progressives write.

Some of the most negative based, comments of spew that anyone can read if they really want to feel bad about themselves and wave around their flag of victimhood like some sort of anti-victory banner.

sad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahhh,</p>
<p>If I want to feel totally rotten and dismal, all I have to do is come here to the WE Blog and read what Liberal Progressives write.</p>
<p>Some of the most negative based, comments of spew that anyone can read if they really want to feel bad about themselves and wave around their flag of victimhood like some sort of anti-victory banner.</p>
<p>sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CapnAmerica</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-troops-running-not-standing-up/#comment-333316</link>
		<dc:creator>CapnAmerica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 17:54:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-troops-running-not-standing-up/#comment-333316</guid>
		<description>"saying there were no African-Americans holding National offices as opposed to elected National office. A big difference."

Yeah, a big difference that shows the extent to which African-Americans &lt;i&gt;loathe&lt;/i&gt; the GOP.

Boxlock, you're beat and beaten badly.

You're like the Black Knight in that Monty Python movie: both arms and legs cut off, his torso sits on the ground--"come back and finish me off, you wimp!"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;saying there were no African-Americans holding National offices as opposed to elected National office. A big difference.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yeah, a big difference that shows the extent to which African-Americans <i>loathe</i> the GOP.</p>
<p>Boxlock, you&#8217;re beat and beaten badly.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re like the Black Knight in that Monty Python movie: both arms and legs cut off, his torso sits on the ground&#8211;&#8221;come back and finish me off, you wimp!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CF2K</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-troops-running-not-standing-up/#comment-333300</link>
		<dc:creator>CF2K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 17:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-troops-running-not-standing-up/#comment-333300</guid>
		<description>Boxlock,

You absolutely have been petty enough to use whatever point you could seize on to win an argument, as the discussion of the lack of Republican African-American ELECTED officials shows.  

For your criticism to have been correct, you would have had to assume that I had never heard of Colin Powell, Condoleeza Rice, Rod Paige, Clarenece Thomas, or Alphonso Jackson--a ridiculous assumption.  But because you could not go on the attack without it, you made it.

For you to accuse me of making a FACTUAL error rather than an ARGUMENTATIVE error, you would have to assume that a) I had never heard of Powell, Rice, Page, Thomas, and Jackson, or b) that I neither knew they were African-American nor Republican.  Those are patently false, cheap assumptions--but they were good enough for you to use in order to try to defend the Repubican Party against the factual charge that it cannot and will not elect even ONE African-American to a national office in the House or Senate.

Was it necessary for me to stipulate that these officials be "elected?" No. Because EVERYBODY KNOWS that the GOP has appointed select African-Americans to certain positions (where they are either denied any real power--Rice--or set up as the fall guy for the administration--Powell), that would have been a ludicrous thing for me to argue, now wouldn't it, Boxlock?  

And yet you accuse me of arguing for it.  So you are willing to accuse me of making an obviously ignorant, ludicrous argument, in order to prove yourself right.  CF2K may be many, many things, but "ignorant" demonstrably isn't one of them.

Judging by your defensiveness, Boxlock, sounds like calling you "petty" hit the mark.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boxlock,</p>
<p>You absolutely have been petty enough to use whatever point you could seize on to win an argument, as the discussion of the lack of Republican African-American ELECTED officials shows.  </p>
<p>For your criticism to have been correct, you would have had to assume that I had never heard of Colin Powell, Condoleeza Rice, Rod Paige, Clarenece Thomas, or Alphonso Jackson&#8211;a ridiculous assumption.  But because you could not go on the attack without it, you made it.</p>
<p>For you to accuse me of making a FACTUAL error rather than an ARGUMENTATIVE error, you would have to assume that a) I had never heard of Powell, Rice, Page, Thomas, and Jackson, or b) that I neither knew they were African-American nor Republican.  Those are patently false, cheap assumptions&#8211;but they were good enough for you to use in order to try to defend the Repubican Party against the factual charge that it cannot and will not elect even ONE African-American to a national office in the House or Senate.</p>
<p>Was it necessary for me to stipulate that these officials be &#8220;elected?&#8221; No. Because EVERYBODY KNOWS that the GOP has appointed select African-Americans to certain positions (where they are either denied any real power&#8211;Rice&#8211;or set up as the fall guy for the administration&#8211;Powell), that would have been a ludicrous thing for me to argue, now wouldn&#8217;t it, Boxlock?  </p>
<p>And yet you accuse me of arguing for it.  So you are willing to accuse me of making an obviously ignorant, ludicrous argument, in order to prove yourself right.  CF2K may be many, many things, but &#8220;ignorant&#8221; demonstrably isn&#8217;t one of them.</p>
<p>Judging by your defensiveness, Boxlock, sounds like calling you &#8220;petty&#8221; hit the mark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: writerdog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-troops-running-not-standing-up/#comment-333296</link>
		<dc:creator>writerdog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 17:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-troops-running-not-standing-up/#comment-333296</guid>
		<description>Grateful_Dave 
Posted April 18, 2008 at 11:44 am &#124;  \l "comment-333281" 
“But they also believe that the job must be finished.”
What is the criteria for the job to be finished in Iraq?

That is the problem that sadly even Mc Cain has no answer for except to keep on keeping on. 
I pointed to the real driving force of why we do not simply admit this mistake and back out.
The job is to keep the United States from being labeled the aggressor in this. Its to un ring the bell we rang, yes that means there is no end to this. It calls for certain facts to be ignored by the world and or overlooked.
We will keep this folly up until no one remembers that the reasons given were not valid and that all the people that died because of it are forgotten in time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grateful_Dave<br />
Posted April 18, 2008 at 11:44 am |  \l &#8220;comment-333281&#8243;<br />
“But they also believe that the job must be finished.”<br />
What is the criteria for the job to be finished in Iraq?</p>
<p>That is the problem that sadly even Mc Cain has no answer for except to keep on keeping on.<br />
I pointed to the real driving force of why we do not simply admit this mistake and back out.<br />
The job is to keep the United States from being labeled the aggressor in this. Its to un ring the bell we rang, yes that means there is no end to this. It calls for certain facts to be ignored by the world and or overlooked.<br />
We will keep this folly up until no one remembers that the reasons given were not valid and that all the people that died because of it are forgotten in time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JMWalker</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-troops-running-not-standing-up/#comment-333284</link>
		<dc:creator>JMWalker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 16:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-troops-running-not-standing-up/#comment-333284</guid>
		<description>Right, we did one heck of a job understanding the Iraqi mind, and all its subtle sects,  prior to this invasion. Great job, boys. Pat yourself on the back and keep telling yourself, "Job well done!" Heck, we should only be there another 200 years or so at this rate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right, we did one heck of a job understanding the Iraqi mind, and all its subtle sects,  prior to this invasion. Great job, boys. Pat yourself on the back and keep telling yourself, &#8220;Job well done!&#8221; Heck, we should only be there another 200 years or so at this rate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grateful_Dave</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-troops-running-not-standing-up/#comment-333281</link>
		<dc:creator>Grateful_Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 16:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-troops-running-not-standing-up/#comment-333281</guid>
		<description>"But they also believe that the job must be finished."

What is the criteria for the job to be finished in Iraq?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;But they also believe that the job must be finished.&#8221;</p>
<p>What is the criteria for the job to be finished in Iraq?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
