<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Iraqi government still looks weak</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-government-still-looks-weak/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-government-still-looks-weak/</link>
	<description>The Wichita Eagle Editorial Department Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 01:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Real Estate Australia</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-government-still-looks-weak/#comment-329570</link>
		<dc:creator>Real Estate Australia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 08:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-government-still-looks-weak/#comment-329570</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Real Estate Australia...&lt;/strong&gt;

Hi - just wanted to say good design and blog -...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Real Estate Australia&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Hi - just wanted to say good design and blog -&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-government-still-looks-weak/#comment-329346</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 17:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-government-still-looks-weak/#comment-329346</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Jack...&lt;/strong&gt;

I don't mean to be too in your face, but I'm not sure I agree with this.  Anyhow, thanks for sharing and I think I'll write a post on this on my blog soon....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Jack&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t mean to be too in your face, but I&#8217;m not sure I agree with this.  Anyhow, thanks for sharing and I think I&#8217;ll write a post on this on my blog soon&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NN</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-government-still-looks-weak/#comment-324396</link>
		<dc:creator>NN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 02:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-government-still-looks-weak/#comment-324396</guid>
		<description>lindainks55: One last gasp on this thread. The most revered man in our politial history is one who actually did something about socio-political wrongs. During the dirty 30's he saw inequity, entered politics and eventually became Premiere of his sparsley populated Prarie Province. He raan a no nonsense administration, balanced the books, did away with waste while he fought the combined might of the North American medico/pharma/insurance lobby to introduce North America's first universal health coverage for that small province. He then ran for Federal office and was responsible for the universal system we have nationally, along with our pension scheme. Tommy Douglas was a bantamweight Golden Gloves Champ who never backed down to the goons he had to face. He was also, get this, a Baptist Minsister and Pastor, a product of the Weyburn Bible College in the tiny town of Weyburn Saskatechewan, as were his predecessors, carrying the good fight to governments by living the gospel. This goes to what to render, to whom, and WHEN. I quit now.........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lindainks55: One last gasp on this thread. The most revered man in our politial history is one who actually did something about socio-political wrongs. During the dirty 30&#8217;s he saw inequity, entered politics and eventually became Premiere of his sparsley populated Prarie Province. He raan a no nonsense administration, balanced the books, did away with waste while he fought the combined might of the North American medico/pharma/insurance lobby to introduce North America&#8217;s first universal health coverage for that small province. He then ran for Federal office and was responsible for the universal system we have nationally, along with our pension scheme. Tommy Douglas was a bantamweight Golden Gloves Champ who never backed down to the goons he had to face. He was also, get this, a Baptist Minsister and Pastor, a product of the Weyburn Bible College in the tiny town of Weyburn Saskatechewan, as were his predecessors, carrying the good fight to governments by living the gospel. This goes to what to render, to whom, and WHEN. I quit now&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NN</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-government-still-looks-weak/#comment-324303</link>
		<dc:creator>NN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 23:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-government-still-looks-weak/#comment-324303</guid>
		<description>lindainks55: The terms Consevative and Liberal have their roots in 19th century English economics. Before that they were either Whigs or Tories. Those who strove make keep cheap and plentiful so as to be avaialable therfore beneficial to all, were called Conservatives. This is good but you to have the money to benefit from the thesis. Others felt the workers should have it in their scope to buy what they produce. They were called Liberals.The flaw with this thesis is that workers would never be able to afford a Rolls Royce. So both nomenclature are self described entities to promote a specific want from the specturm in which you function, even though both are impossible to achieve. Which is why politics, everybody's politics is so darn interesting. The ancient Greek word for those who did not partake in public affairs is idios. Change the "s" to a "t".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lindainks55: The terms Consevative and Liberal have their roots in 19th century English economics. Before that they were either Whigs or Tories. Those who strove make keep cheap and plentiful so as to be avaialable therfore beneficial to all, were called Conservatives. This is good but you to have the money to benefit from the thesis. Others felt the workers should have it in their scope to buy what they produce. They were called Liberals.The flaw with this thesis is that workers would never be able to afford a Rolls Royce. So both nomenclature are self described entities to promote a specific want from the specturm in which you function, even though both are impossible to achieve. Which is why politics, everybody&#8217;s politics is so darn interesting. The ancient Greek word for those who did not partake in public affairs is idios. Change the &#8220;s&#8221; to a &#8220;t&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lindainks55</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-government-still-looks-weak/#comment-324189</link>
		<dc:creator>lindainks55</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 20:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-government-still-looks-weak/#comment-324189</guid>
		<description>I need to state that last sentence to better reflect my hope.

It appears the extremes of the "right," will need to completely break the Republican Party of today before enough realize the mockery they are making of what was The Grand Ole Party.  And I hope their influence is diminished so the party can return to the ideals that made it grand.

The neocons have no place in a sane world.  The religious right should remember the wisdom of, "Render unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I need to state that last sentence to better reflect my hope.</p>
<p>It appears the extremes of the &#8220;right,&#8221; will need to completely break the Republican Party of today before enough realize the mockery they are making of what was The Grand Ole Party.  And I hope their influence is diminished so the party can return to the ideals that made it grand.</p>
<p>The neocons have no place in a sane world.  The religious right should remember the wisdom of, &#8220;Render unto Caesar the things which are Caesar&#8217;s.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lindainks55</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-government-still-looks-weak/#comment-324178</link>
		<dc:creator>lindainks55</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 19:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-government-still-looks-weak/#comment-324178</guid>
		<description>It's funny, NN, that statement about being Conservative which probably isn't.

I have a delightful Canadian friend who came to America for her doctorate.  She graduated Harvard last fall and began a post-doc position at the Salk Institute in San Diego.  She described her Dad in almost the same words you used to describe yourself!  She also told me he is taking a greater than usual interest in America's upcoming presidential election and never ceases to be amazed that the current president was elected TWICE!  We've had many conversations that have helped both of us understand the similarities and the differences in our countries.

You are so correct in knowing that Canadian Conservative is far from neocons who want to bring one-world order using their ideas of what democracy means (and has little to do with anything democracy stands for!), far from America's religious right who would like the Constitution to be rewritten and more closely resemble The Bible.  And if they can't rewrite the Constitution they want to legislate their morality.  It is impossible to understand why either group of extremists who want to completely control can say they stand for less government influence.  A real enigma!

Canadian Conservative is closer to what the word used to mean in America - less government, fiscal responsibility, personal responsibility, help with a leg up but not a lifelong handout.

My hope is that once these extremes have completely broken the Republican Party of today the Grand Ole Party can once again be grand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s funny, NN, that statement about being Conservative which probably isn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>I have a delightful Canadian friend who came to America for her doctorate.  She graduated Harvard last fall and began a post-doc position at the Salk Institute in San Diego.  She described her Dad in almost the same words you used to describe yourself!  She also told me he is taking a greater than usual interest in America&#8217;s upcoming presidential election and never ceases to be amazed that the current president was elected TWICE!  We&#8217;ve had many conversations that have helped both of us understand the similarities and the differences in our countries.</p>
<p>You are so correct in knowing that Canadian Conservative is far from neocons who want to bring one-world order using their ideas of what democracy means (and has little to do with anything democracy stands for!), far from America&#8217;s religious right who would like the Constitution to be rewritten and more closely resemble The Bible.  And if they can&#8217;t rewrite the Constitution they want to legislate their morality.  It is impossible to understand why either group of extremists who want to completely control can say they stand for less government influence.  A real enigma!</p>
<p>Canadian Conservative is closer to what the word used to mean in America - less government, fiscal responsibility, personal responsibility, help with a leg up but not a lifelong handout.</p>
<p>My hope is that once these extremes have completely broken the Republican Party of today the Grand Ole Party can once again be grand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NN</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-government-still-looks-weak/#comment-324140</link>
		<dc:creator>NN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 19:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-government-still-looks-weak/#comment-324140</guid>
		<description>lindainks55: Thank you for your advice. I never let politics stop my enjoyment of American hospitality, always a pleasant, varied and genuine experience. PS: I usually vote Conservative which probably isn't, to neocons</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lindainks55: Thank you for your advice. I never let politics stop my enjoyment of American hospitality, always a pleasant, varied and genuine experience. PS: I usually vote Conservative which probably isn&#8217;t, to neocons</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lindainks55</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-government-still-looks-weak/#comment-323888</link>
		<dc:creator>lindainks55</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 13:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-government-still-looks-weak/#comment-323888</guid>
		<description>"Just wondering why the term “Liberal” is such a dirty word?"  Am I missing something here?

-------------

NN,

You're not missing anything worthwhile.  Here in America there are a small number of people who share one extremely small brain with a smaller amount of knowledge.  There is no room in the shared brain for much more than what it takes to keep themselves alive, plus a few sound bites which include one about the word "liberal" being a dirty word.  There are no synapses in this brain so the small amount of knowledge is static and brain signals cannot be transmitted from one to the other, no new knowledge can be shared or used.

Their brain has short circuited! They are armed so be very careful!  They are the greatest threat to America, visitors to our country and temporarily to countries who interact with America.  We are fast approaching a date when this threat will be diminished. If you plan a trip to America the best advice I can offer is plan to arrive after January 20, 2009.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Just wondering why the term “Liberal” is such a dirty word?&#8221;  Am I missing something here?</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>NN,</p>
<p>You&#8217;re not missing anything worthwhile.  Here in America there are a small number of people who share one extremely small brain with a smaller amount of knowledge.  There is no room in the shared brain for much more than what it takes to keep themselves alive, plus a few sound bites which include one about the word &#8220;liberal&#8221; being a dirty word.  There are no synapses in this brain so the small amount of knowledge is static and brain signals cannot be transmitted from one to the other, no new knowledge can be shared or used.</p>
<p>Their brain has short circuited! They are armed so be very careful!  They are the greatest threat to America, visitors to our country and temporarily to countries who interact with America.  We are fast approaching a date when this threat will be diminished. If you plan a trip to America the best advice I can offer is plan to arrive after January 20, 2009.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-government-still-looks-weak/#comment-323853</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 12:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-government-still-looks-weak/#comment-323853</guid>
		<description>writerdog - you left out an important piece of the story.  The 'liberal MSM' was an integral part of the selling of Bush's war.  The supposedly liberal New York Times led the pack in cheerleading the neocon lies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>writerdog - you left out an important piece of the story.  The &#8216;liberal MSM&#8217; was an integral part of the selling of Bush&#8217;s war.  The supposedly liberal New York Times led the pack in cheerleading the neocon lies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: writerdog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-government-still-looks-weak/#comment-323836</link>
		<dc:creator>writerdog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 12:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-government-still-looks-weak/#comment-323836</guid>
		<description>This is from the message board:

From:  writerdog   Apr-1 9:31 am  
To:  Classof65   (88 of 96)  
 
  14435.88 in reply to 14435.84  
 
Powell problem was he is a “good soldier” too good a soldier it would seem. From reading several books few with in the inner circle like Powell. But they needed his creditably, imagine if Cheney had been the one whom went before the U.N. security council. Soldiers are put in that dilemma everyday, given orders that on the face of it may not seem to be wise or well thought out. Its a razor edge concerning the “Nuremberg defense”, Powell had a duty to both the President and the country along with himself. 

Yes I too wished that he had put the country above the President, but there is some background that would explain not just Powell’s acceptance but the Congress’s too. The “Special operations planning group for Iraq” that was formed with in the DOD. With the help of several “plants” within the CIA got where they controlled the information that was released. When ever there was a request for information from whomever, it was the Special operations planning group whom would send out the “talking points” to other branches that were to be included in all reports and information briefings. When ever there was a request from the CIA, Congress, the Pentagon even the White house itself. These talking points would be included, when someone becomes the center point that everyone relies upon. That gives license to spread what ever information you choose to. BTW, the Bush comment about the Constitution has turn out to be an example of this. Everyone was quoting it, but the source was a rogue journalist whom few paid attention to until he reported he had a couple of witnesses to Bush saying it. But there was not evidence or further witnesses.
But the remark grows legs and ran throughout the net and finally into the MSM.

In this case, the Special operations planning group had combed through the intel looking for only that which would support the position. The Yellow cake report document had been floated around the intelligence agencies throughout the world. It had been dismissed twice by our own CIA as a forgery a couple of times before it gained legs in the build-up for the invasion. The rumor of a meeting between Iraq intelligence and Atta in Prague, had been deemed unreliable by the German, Italian and the U.S. intelligence several years ago. The source was a known liar and was peddling false intelligence to make money.

But since they supported the Neo-cons within the Administration desires they were taken as a fact.
spread as facts and put into every report about Iraq. Its splitting hairs, but that is why I say that Bush&#38;Co. did not lie. To them it was the truth and if one truly believes even the most outlandish fantasy. Then it is not a conscious lie when they repeat it. One of the biggest reason that what was said accepted as the truth was plain laziness. The question was asked and no one within the Government that was not apart of the plan checked to see if it was fact and just passed it along. This included Powell...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is from the message board:</p>
<p>From:  writerdog   Apr-1 9:31 am<br />
To:  Classof65   (88 of 96)  </p>
<p>  14435.88 in reply to 14435.84  </p>
<p>Powell problem was he is a “good soldier” too good a soldier it would seem. From reading several books few with in the inner circle like Powell. But they needed his creditably, imagine if Cheney had been the one whom went before the U.N. security council. Soldiers are put in that dilemma everyday, given orders that on the face of it may not seem to be wise or well thought out. Its a razor edge concerning the “Nuremberg defense”, Powell had a duty to both the President and the country along with himself. </p>
<p>Yes I too wished that he had put the country above the President, but there is some background that would explain not just Powell’s acceptance but the Congress’s too. The “Special operations planning group for Iraq” that was formed with in the DOD. With the help of several “plants” within the CIA got where they controlled the information that was released. When ever there was a request for information from whomever, it was the Special operations planning group whom would send out the “talking points” to other branches that were to be included in all reports and information briefings. When ever there was a request from the CIA, Congress, the Pentagon even the White house itself. These talking points would be included, when someone becomes the center point that everyone relies upon. That gives license to spread what ever information you choose to. BTW, the Bush comment about the Constitution has turn out to be an example of this. Everyone was quoting it, but the source was a rogue journalist whom few paid attention to until he reported he had a couple of witnesses to Bush saying it. But there was not evidence or further witnesses.<br />
But the remark grows legs and ran throughout the net and finally into the MSM.</p>
<p>In this case, the Special operations planning group had combed through the intel looking for only that which would support the position. The Yellow cake report document had been floated around the intelligence agencies throughout the world. It had been dismissed twice by our own CIA as a forgery a couple of times before it gained legs in the build-up for the invasion. The rumor of a meeting between Iraq intelligence and Atta in Prague, had been deemed unreliable by the German, Italian and the U.S. intelligence several years ago. The source was a known liar and was peddling false intelligence to make money.</p>
<p>But since they supported the Neo-cons within the Administration desires they were taken as a fact.<br />
spread as facts and put into every report about Iraq. Its splitting hairs, but that is why I say that Bush&amp;Co. did not lie. To them it was the truth and if one truly believes even the most outlandish fantasy. Then it is not a conscious lie when they repeat it. One of the biggest reason that what was said accepted as the truth was plain laziness. The question was asked and no one within the Government that was not apart of the plan checked to see if it was fact and just passed it along. This included Powell&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J M Walker</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-government-still-looks-weak/#comment-323749</link>
		<dc:creator>J M Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 02:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-government-still-looks-weak/#comment-323749</guid>
		<description>You know something, Regular? The facts of about the way the intel was doctored, and why, has been posted here too many times for you not to have read it. What you choose to believe is your business, but the truth of the facts can't be denied: This administration wanted a war with Iraq from day one (actually, prior to 1999), and was going to get their wish come hell or high water. They got their wish, by subverting intel, and over 4000 American lie dead because of it.

Careful you don't walk off the end of the earth, there. I'm in your mind, it's still flat, and the moon's made out of green cheese. Grill yourself a sammich.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know something, Regular? The facts of about the way the intel was doctored, and why, has been posted here too many times for you not to have read it. What you choose to believe is your business, but the truth of the facts can&#8217;t be denied: This administration wanted a war with Iraq from day one (actually, prior to 1999), and was going to get their wish come hell or high water. They got their wish, by subverting intel, and over 4000 American lie dead because of it.</p>
<p>Careful you don&#8217;t walk off the end of the earth, there. I&#8217;m in your mind, it&#8217;s still flat, and the moon&#8217;s made out of green cheese. Grill yourself a sammich.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J M Walker</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-government-still-looks-weak/#comment-323746</link>
		<dc:creator>J M Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 02:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-government-still-looks-weak/#comment-323746</guid>
		<description>Mary, you got that wrong:
Regular kept the bird because he called the pet store, thinking the bird was dead, and the owner told him the bird was still alive. Who was he to doubt that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mary, you got that wrong:<br />
Regular kept the bird because he called the pet store, thinking the bird was dead, and the owner told him the bird was still alive. Who was he to doubt that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Caruso</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-government-still-looks-weak/#comment-323740</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Caruso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 02:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-government-still-looks-weak/#comment-323740</guid>
		<description>Goodnite y'all...it's past my bedtime.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Goodnite y&#8217;all&#8230;it&#8217;s past my bedtime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NN</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-government-still-looks-weak/#comment-323739</link>
		<dc:creator>NN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 02:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-government-still-looks-weak/#comment-323739</guid>
		<description>I often see "Liberal" used in the same context as traitor, stupid, subverive or 5th columnist in many of these threads. America like Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the UK, all western European nations (especially the Nordic ones) enjoy the nomenclature of Liberal Western Democracy. Bush refers to the US as a Liberal Western Democracy. Am I missing something here? There was a long post in another thread quoting JR Dunn's "The Disgrace of Liberalism" which is perhaps the most incoerent discourse on Liberalism I've ever read. OK, technicaly the US is a Congressional Republic not a Democracy, but it's aims and objects are the same. Just wondering why the term "Liberal" is such a dirty word?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I often see &#8220;Liberal&#8221; used in the same context as traitor, stupid, subverive or 5th columnist in many of these threads. America like Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the UK, all western European nations (especially the Nordic ones) enjoy the nomenclature of Liberal Western Democracy. Bush refers to the US as a Liberal Western Democracy. Am I missing something here? There was a long post in another thread quoting JR Dunn&#8217;s &#8220;The Disgrace of Liberalism&#8221; which is perhaps the most incoerent discourse on Liberalism I&#8217;ve ever read. OK, technicaly the US is a Congressional Republic not a Democracy, but it&#8217;s aims and objects are the same. Just wondering why the term &#8220;Liberal&#8221; is such a dirty word?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Caruso</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-government-still-looks-weak/#comment-323735</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Caruso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 02:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-government-still-looks-weak/#comment-323735</guid>
		<description>Haven't you seen that Monty Python episode, Reg? I SWEAR it does exist!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haven&#8217;t you seen that Monty Python episode, Reg? I SWEAR it does exist!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WSClark</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-government-still-looks-weak/#comment-323732</link>
		<dc:creator>WSClark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 02:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-government-still-looks-weak/#comment-323732</guid>
		<description>McCluer is on the verge of another meltdown, followed by his claim that he is leaving the blog forever, only to return the next day under another nic and starting the whole process over again.

Yada, yada, same shit, different day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McCluer is on the verge of another meltdown, followed by his claim that he is leaving the blog forever, only to return the next day under another nic and starting the whole process over again.</p>
<p>Yada, yada, same shit, different day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Regular</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-government-still-looks-weak/#comment-323728</link>
		<dc:creator>Regular</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 02:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-government-still-looks-weak/#comment-323728</guid>
		<description>Nice story Mary,

Got any facts to add or?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice story Mary,</p>
<p>Got any facts to add or?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Caruso</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-government-still-looks-weak/#comment-323725</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Caruso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 02:04:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-government-still-looks-weak/#comment-323725</guid>
		<description>Regular reminds of the old Monty Python skit where the guy goes back to the pet store to return the dead parrot and the shopkeeper keeps insisting that the bird is still alive, even though it's apparent to any sane person it's dead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regular reminds of the old Monty Python skit where the guy goes back to the pet store to return the dead parrot and the shopkeeper keeps insisting that the bird is still alive, even though it&#8217;s apparent to any sane person it&#8217;s dead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: American Way</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-government-still-looks-weak/#comment-323723</link>
		<dc:creator>American Way</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 02:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-government-still-looks-weak/#comment-323723</guid>
		<description>Original Thread: "Iraqi government is not yet capable of standing up and delivering"

And they never will be - with or without American firepower.

The Sunni Tribes have their own power centers operating for ages across the region. Likewise the majority Shiites. Bush Senior, on the advise of the Saudi King - did not take out Saddam (a sunni). Sunni Saudia Arabia feared the power the Shia would unfold, and knew the road would be bloody. Iran, on the other side, is supporting their own form of muslim power. The buffer between the two powers is Iraq - and now America pisses off both sides. No win situation. Al-Qaeda, ever the opportunist, takes advantage of hate on both sides for anything US, and weasels their way in.

In short, get us the hell out of there.
And phuck Saudi Arabia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Original Thread: &#8220;Iraqi government is not yet capable of standing up and delivering&#8221;</p>
<p>And they never will be - with or without American firepower.</p>
<p>The Sunni Tribes have their own power centers operating for ages across the region. Likewise the majority Shiites. Bush Senior, on the advise of the Saudi King - did not take out Saddam (a sunni). Sunni Saudia Arabia feared the power the Shia would unfold, and knew the road would be bloody. Iran, on the other side, is supporting their own form of muslim power. The buffer between the two powers is Iraq - and now America pisses off both sides. No win situation. Al-Qaeda, ever the opportunist, takes advantage of hate on both sides for anything US, and weasels their way in.</p>
<p>In short, get us the hell out of there.<br />
And phuck Saudi Arabia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Regular</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-government-still-looks-weak/#comment-323703</link>
		<dc:creator>Regular</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 01:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-government-still-looks-weak/#comment-323703</guid>
		<description>Actually, Karl Rove didn't say that exile, I watched Rove address that issue on C-SPAN.

I was just testing you.

Sorry, you failed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, Karl Rove didn&#8217;t say that exile, I watched Rove address that issue on C-SPAN.</p>
<p>I was just testing you.</p>
<p>Sorry, you failed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lindainks55</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-government-still-looks-weak/#comment-323700</link>
		<dc:creator>lindainks55</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 01:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-government-still-looks-weak/#comment-323700</guid>
		<description>It is still true he can't be trusted.  He proves that each time he caves into bushco.  He has been doing it since 2000.

Who posted the Mr. Cave sonnet recently?   It is really good.  I'll go look for it so no one will have to miss the truths of why McCain can't be trusted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is still true he can&#8217;t be trusted.  He proves that each time he caves into bushco.  He has been doing it since 2000.</p>
<p>Who posted the Mr. Cave sonnet recently?   It is really good.  I&#8217;ll go look for it so no one will have to miss the truths of why McCain can&#8217;t be trusted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: exile</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-government-still-looks-weak/#comment-323699</link>
		<dc:creator>exile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 01:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-government-still-looks-weak/#comment-323699</guid>
		<description>Regular
Posted April 1, 2008 at 7:18 pm &#124; Permalink

You do know what a fact is don’t you J M Walker?

ok
so it's TRUE then that mccain fathered a black child out of wedlock ??

just because bush rove said it was true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regular<br />
Posted April 1, 2008 at 7:18 pm | Permalink</p>
<p>You do know what a fact is don’t you J M Walker?</p>
<p>ok<br />
so it&#8217;s TRUE then that mccain fathered a black child out of wedlock ??</p>
<p>just because bush rove said it was true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Regular</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-government-still-looks-weak/#comment-323693</link>
		<dc:creator>Regular</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 01:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-government-still-looks-weak/#comment-323693</guid>
		<description>I dunno exile, it's your lie, elaborate on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dunno exile, it&#8217;s your lie, elaborate on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: exile</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-government-still-looks-weak/#comment-323690</link>
		<dc:creator>exile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 01:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-government-still-looks-weak/#comment-323690</guid>
		<description>Regular
Posted April 1, 2008 at 3:28 pm &#124; Permalink
To January 20, 2009:
293 days, 6 hours, 46 minutes

when

John McCain will raise his right hand with his hand on the Bible and takes the oath of office. 


well

a couple of years ago bush and rove said mccain fathered a black child out of wedlock and since that was "true" americans couldn't trust him.

is that still true ??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regular<br />
Posted April 1, 2008 at 3:28 pm | Permalink<br />
To January 20, 2009:<br />
293 days, 6 hours, 46 minutes</p>
<p>when</p>
<p>John McCain will raise his right hand with his hand on the Bible and takes the oath of office. </p>
<p>well</p>
<p>a couple of years ago bush and rove said mccain fathered a black child out of wedlock and since that was &#8220;true&#8221; americans couldn&#8217;t trust him.</p>
<p>is that still true ??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah Bellum</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-government-still-looks-weak/#comment-323687</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Bellum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 01:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/iraqi-government-still-looks-weak/#comment-323687</guid>
		<description>Thus Reg. illustrates Rule No. 2. Always get the last word.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thus Reg. illustrates Rule No. 2. Always get the last word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
