WE Blog

Wingnuts are sissies what else`can you say?

Obama’s technical advisor introduced a video of a gay, singing Jesus who gets hit by a bus:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2004723/posts

Well now, another nut case in the Obama camp, huh?

Come now…

We’ve all seen the bitterness of wingnuts who contribute to this forum. “MaxGrobnik” quivers in abject fear that Obama or Hillary are going to storm his porch in a desparate effort to steal his guns. “Nethaniel” has been so screwed up by the government (and is likely among the one-in-four Iraq War veterans suffering from PTSD), “outlander” and “Franklin” and “ksgrm” and “Regular” (et al) show us just how paranoid contemporary conservatism can be.

Do a bone-dig and try to find any of these people who actually were for John Sidney McCain the Third six or even three months ago. And now that McSame has switched from all his “straight talk” positions to promising to become a born-again McBush, the Republic Party advocates still cant come up with anything to justify their support; they can only attack the Democrats’ contenders.

81% of Americans think America is on the Wrong Track. 28% of last-ditchers actually approve of the presidency of George WMD Bush.

Ha ha! Good one Monkey!

McCain is not W. And as I mentioned to CF on another thread, what alternative do conservatives have for voting McCain? Vote for the condescending wine and cheese liberal Obama and his questionable friends? Hillary? Stay home and watch one of them win?

I love absurdity. Thanks, I needed a good laugh.

“Novak, by the way, will be the featured speaker at a dinner and lecture by the Flint Hills Center for Public Policy at 6 p.m. May 1 at the Courtyard Marriott Old Town. Cost is $35; call 316-634-0218.”

Hey Rhonda, do you get any kick backs for advertising the cause of the propaganda arm of Koch family? The same family that brought us the infamous John Birch Society. The same group that called president John F. Kennedy a communist. Time to fess up Rhonda…

Why are people scared of the truth? There is nothing Obama has said that isn’t true…for years the right wing has thrown out destractions to what’s really going on and the Bushbots soak it up like sponges. Gun rights, prayer in school, creationism, abortion…all things that have no direct effect on the major crisis our country is facing now…namely the economy, the war, the deficit, American jobs being outsourced, the disasterous Bush foreign policy…as long as the right wing can focus on stupid things like Obama knowing some radical years ago or that his minister is an asshole or that he doesn’t wear a flag pin on his lapel, they don’t have to look to see what’s really going on as a result of crazyass Republican leadership of the last 8 yrs.
You cons are so easily distracted from the reality that is our country today…it’s absolutely pathetic and sad. Wake up and open your eyes and quit believing all the bulls**t and propaganda meant to distract you from the critical issues.

“null” was me. Again.

Ksgrm has said it best:

“I don’t like McCain but given the choices I have I will vote for him.”

Real enthusiastic isn’t it?

We shall see who can get out the vote come November.

“What about “@unt-gate?” Did John McCain really call his wife a “@unt?” I guess it’ll come up in the general election “debates.”
*
*
*
*

For a null, you sure are dumb. We nulls don’t repeat crap from lying radical liberal websites.

McCain does have a foul mouth (like many people of his generation) and yes he did use the c-word with Cindy in ‘92.

A null is an empty object or in this case an empty variable used as a place holder for the name field on the registration.

It’s a blog error with the registration system.

I’m not an error, but the null at 6:15pm is.

wsc, so far today “null” has been CF2K, Outlander, Franklin and a couple others. “Null” has opinions that span the political spectrum and it gets very confusing very quickly! This brought to you by REGISTRATION I guess.

When WordPress decides I need to log out just to log back in I get nothing posted under any nic. So, who knows what’s going on!

I kind of like the idea of randomly selecting posters and “null”ifying them by taking away their nic.

However, God help Brownlee if it happens to Regular. He would probably have a stroke (or one of his personalities would).

Psul likes to point at ‘friends’ - well, how about this one from the Bush/McBush crowd:

Former Justice Dept. official to admit to taking gifts in Abramoff case

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/homepage/story/34414.html

And, while McSame tries to tell us how he will reform the financial mess, don’t forget HIS role in the S&L debacle.

You LIBS will LOVE the agenda of Obama who does not want you to have the right to defend your own life, in your own home!

Barack Obama’s Slippery Oratory
by Wayne LaPierre, Executive Vice President
NRA Standing Guard - April 11, 2008

To understand Barack Obama on the Second Amendment, you have to know about the clash of character between the then-Chicago state senator and an ordinary citizen who exercised his right to armed self-defense in violation of a local gun ban.

That citizen was a 52-year-old resident of Wilmette, Illinois, who, on Dec. 28, 2003, woke to find that, during the night, his home had been invaded by a career criminal; a thief who stole household items, keys and the homeowner’s car.

The victim, Hale DeMar, described his fear in a letter to the Chicago Sun- Times: “For me, the seconds until I found my children still safely tucked in their beds were horrifying . . . The police were called and in routine fashion they came, took the report and with little concern left, promising to increase surveillance. Little comfort, since the invader now had keys to our home and our automobiles. The police informed me that this was not an uncommon event in east Wilmette and offered their condolences . . .” Not 24 hours after the first burglary, the thief returned. Using DeMar’s house keys, the man entered the home, this time setting off the alarm system, automatically notifying the security company. Given the previous night’s lackluster response by police, DeMar was prepared, armed with a handgun–legally purchased years before and kept in a safe. But under Wilmette’s gun ban, that firearm in the home was illegal.

DeMar confronted the criminal, and believing his children were in danger, shot the burglar, who then fled the home.

“Until you are shocked by a piercing alarm in the middle of the night and met in your kitchen by a masked invader as your children shudder in their beds, until you confront that very real nightmare, please don’t suggest that some village trustee knows better … “If my actions have spared only one family from the distress and trauma that this habitual criminal has caused hundreds of others, then I have served my civic duty and taken one evil creature off of our streets, something that our impotent criminal justice system had failed to do, despite some thirty odd arrests, plea bargains and suspended sentences.” The burglar, who was arrested after driving DeMar’s stolen SUV to a hospital, had an extensive criminal record.

Cook County prosecutors ultimately declared DeMar’s use of a firearm to be justified. But Wilmette village officials pressed nonetheless to prosecute him for illegal possession of his handgun–a charge punishable by a huge fine and jail time. A town official was quoted in Reason magazine saying, “We need to set the example that we’re trying to protect our citizens.” And he said, DeMar–by possessing a legally purchased handgun–”is endangering innocent civilians.” The outcry of the Illinois public was heard all the way to the state capitol.

As a result, the Illinois House and Senate passed legislation in May 2004 to protect citizens who use handguns in self-defense in their homes or businesses despite local handgun bans.

The House accepted the DeMar selfdefense bill by a vote of 86-25 and the Senate moved the legislation on a 38-20 vote.

And here lies the seminal moment for state Senator Barack Obama. When Obama turned thumbs down on the bill, he voted against the most basic element of the Second Amendment– the right of defense of self and family– the reason that millions of Americans own firearms.

When the governor vetoed the bill, Obama once again voted against a citizen’s right to self-defense.

Despite his vote, the veto override passed the Senate and the House by overwhelming majorities, thereby enacting this bill into law.

Now, fast forward to today’s slippery oratory of U.S. Sen. Barack Obama just three years from being an unknown state senator–now morphed by the media into a spellbinding u.s. senator seeking to be president of the United States.

Using words like “protecting sportsmen,” Obama is now saying that he believes in the Second Amendment … but with almost universal exceptions, all of which he lists under the heading of “common sense gun safety laws.” “Common sense gun safety” and the Second Amendment? Like endorsing the D.C. gun ban, which outlaws armed self-defense in the home–now being challenged before the u.s. Supreme Court. Obama, who as president would be in the position to nominate justices to that high court, has declared that the d.c. ban doesn’t violate the Second Amendment.

“Common sense gun safety” and the Second Amendment? In a “1998 National Political Awareness Test,” he pledged to support a “Ban [on] the sale or transfer of all forms of semi-automatic weapons”–meaning most handguns and many rifles and shotguns that you and I own.

“Common sense gun safety” and the Second Amendment? Like demanding that the federal government preempt the 40 hard-won state laws creating Right-to-Carry.

Here’s how the Chicago Tribune put it: “Obama said he opposed allowing ordinary citizens to carry concealed weapons and that a federal law banning concealed carried weapons except for law enforcement is needed.” “Common sense gun safety” and the Second Amendment? Like the draconian proposals funded to the tune of $18,000,000 by the rabidly anti-gun Joyce Foundation while Obama was an activist member of its board of directors.

Obama’s alleged support of the Second Amendment is utterly cynical and false. Barack Obama is not for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms; he`s out to destroy it.

http://www.nodakoutdoors.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=418899

MaxGrobnik…*yawn*..

Max,
The DemLibs are too afraid to defend themselves. They need, and I mean NEED, a nanny government to care for and protect them. Even though it’s a false hope. I guess you can’t blame a rabbit for its timidity, or a jackal for it’s detestably nature, that’s just the way they are made, same with DemLibs. Fortunately there are stronger people to lead.
What they fail to realize of course is that THEY are their own and the country’s worst enemy.
Fortunately they repeatedly prove themselves to be just plain stupid. Just look at the way they are running their campaign, or the House of Reps, they are to be laughed at. That should make anyone fear what would happen if they get in.
Lets just sit back and watch the spectacle of them embarrassing themselves over and over and over.

“The DemLibs are too afraid to defend themselves.”

Take for instance, George McGovern who flew bombing runs in WW2 or John Kennedy who skippered PT 109 or his eldest brother who died flying or Max Cleland who left his legs in Vietnam or John Murtha the former Marine Corps Drill Instructor who volunteered for Vietnam.

As for this DemLib, if you threaten me or mine, you’ll find out how “afraid” I am to defend myself.

D!ckl!ck.

See how silly they become, like a bunch of undisciplined children throwing a tantrum.
Ha, I love it.

CapnAmerica Posted April 21, 2008 at 10:20 pm
“As for this DemLib, if you threaten me or mine, you’ll find out how “afraid” I am to defend myself.
D!ckl!ck.”

All they come back with are rants and name calling, whoa….am I impressed CapnPu$$y!

columnist Robert Novak asks “what’s the matter with Obama?”

another dumb ass repuke talking head.

really… wtf’s the matter with the people who listen to novak ??

Who’s behind the group that invited Novak? And why Novak? I hope the Eagle covers his remarks and follows the money.