<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cost of losing is even higher, senators say</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/cost-of-losing-is-even-higher-senators-say/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/cost-of-losing-is-even-higher-senators-say/</link>
	<description>The Wichita Eagle Editorial Department Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 02:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rage</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/cost-of-losing-is-even-higher-senators-say/#comment-329719</link>
		<dc:creator>Rage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 17:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/cost-of-losing-is-even-higher-senators-say/#comment-329719</guid>
		<description>Next stanza:
"Now we are fighting a war over there/
 No matter's who's the winner, we can't pay the cost!"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Next stanza:<br />
&#8220;Now we are fighting a war over there/<br />
 No matter&#8217;s who&#8217;s the winner, we can&#8217;t pay the cost!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: poetryman69</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/cost-of-losing-is-even-higher-senators-say/#comment-329581</link>
		<dc:creator>poetryman69</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 11:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/cost-of-losing-is-even-higher-senators-say/#comment-329581</guid>
		<description>after Dubya has accomplished his goals of creating another Shiite state and increasing the profits of the oil companies, we should get out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>after Dubya has accomplished his goals of creating another Shiite state and increasing the profits of the oil companies, we should get out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LibDave</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/cost-of-losing-is-even-higher-senators-say/#comment-329553</link>
		<dc:creator>LibDave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 05:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/cost-of-losing-is-even-higher-senators-say/#comment-329553</guid>
		<description>"Can anyone identify where the lines form this song came from? “We dont know how to mind our own buisness,because the whole world has to be just like us.” That is the Cons foreign policy in a nutshell"

Oh,yea. Monster, by Steppinwolf. Killer album too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Can anyone identify where the lines form this song came from? “We dont know how to mind our own buisness,because the whole world has to be just like us.” That is the Cons foreign policy in a nutshell&#8221;</p>
<p>Oh,yea. Monster, by Steppinwolf. Killer album too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: exile</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/cost-of-losing-is-even-higher-senators-say/#comment-329550</link>
		<dc:creator>exile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 04:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/cost-of-losing-is-even-higher-senators-say/#comment-329550</guid>
		<description>“There is no question the war in Iraq — like the Cold War, World War II and every other conflict we have fought in our history — costs money,” Sens. John Lieberman, I-Conn

what a bush dumbass suckup</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“There is no question the war in Iraq — like the Cold War, World War II and every other conflict we have fought in our history — costs money,” Sens. John Lieberman, I-Conn</p>
<p>what a bush dumbass suckup</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Freebird</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/cost-of-losing-is-even-higher-senators-say/#comment-329547</link>
		<dc:creator>Freebird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 04:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/cost-of-losing-is-even-higher-senators-say/#comment-329547</guid>
		<description>Can anyone identify where the lines form this song came from?  "We dont know how to mind our own buisness,because the whole world has to be just like us."  That is the Cons foreign policy in a nutshell</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can anyone identify where the lines form this song came from?  &#8220;We dont know how to mind our own buisness,because the whole world has to be just like us.&#8221;  That is the Cons foreign policy in a nutshell</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WSClark</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/cost-of-losing-is-even-higher-senators-say/#comment-329546</link>
		<dc:creator>WSClark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 04:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/cost-of-losing-is-even-higher-senators-say/#comment-329546</guid>
		<description>“But as great as the costs of this struggle have been, so too are the dividends to our national security from a successful outcome, with a functioning, representative Iraqi government and a stabilized Middle East."

Does anyone believe this crap at this point?

Iraq WAS stable, abet under a brutal dictator - but at least they were a secular nation.

Saudi Arabia is a fundamentalist nation under a brutal monarchy, yet Bush holds hands with the leaders of Saudi Arabia and lauds our relationship with them.

They give women lashes because they were RAPED!

We must be crazy or stupid or both.

Iraq will never be a functioning democracy. They will never be stable, neither will the Middle East.

The blood in the sands of the Middle East runs too deep and there is nothing that America can do about it.

Damn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“But as great as the costs of this struggle have been, so too are the dividends to our national security from a successful outcome, with a functioning, representative Iraqi government and a stabilized Middle East.&#8221;</p>
<p>Does anyone believe this crap at this point?</p>
<p>Iraq WAS stable, abet under a brutal dictator - but at least they were a secular nation.</p>
<p>Saudi Arabia is a fundamentalist nation under a brutal monarchy, yet Bush holds hands with the leaders of Saudi Arabia and lauds our relationship with them.</p>
<p>They give women lashes because they were RAPED!</p>
<p>We must be crazy or stupid or both.</p>
<p>Iraq will never be a functioning democracy. They will never be stable, neither will the Middle East.</p>
<p>The blood in the sands of the Middle East runs too deep and there is nothing that America can do about it.</p>
<p>Damn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Davis</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/cost-of-losing-is-even-higher-senators-say/#comment-329532</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 03:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/cost-of-losing-is-even-higher-senators-say/#comment-329532</guid>
		<description>Check this out, the Clash, and the government:

http://www.sacbee.com/babin/image_media/851326.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check this out, the Clash, and the government:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sacbee.com/babin/image_media/851326.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.sacbee.com/babin/image_media/851326.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phantom</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/cost-of-losing-is-even-higher-senators-say/#comment-329513</link>
		<dc:creator>Phantom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 02:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/cost-of-losing-is-even-higher-senators-say/#comment-329513</guid>
		<description>If the cost of dems. not uniting is a victory for Mccain, it is a cost America will continue to pay (charge) on generations to come.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the cost of dems. not uniting is a victory for Mccain, it is a cost America will continue to pay (charge) on generations to come.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WSClark</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/cost-of-losing-is-even-higher-senators-say/#comment-329488</link>
		<dc:creator>WSClark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 01:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/cost-of-losing-is-even-higher-senators-say/#comment-329488</guid>
		<description>"This is why you are little more than a partisan hack."

Were you around in '68 Price? Were you involved with the election campaign? Were you actively involved in the anti-war movement? 

In '68, the American people had enough of Viet Nam - they wanted out.

After Bobby Kennedy's death, the Democratic Party hijacked the convention and nominated LBJ's VP, the hapless Happy Warrior Hubert Humphrey.

Nixon tried to capture the anti-war vote with his "secret plan" meme - many bought it - enough that Nixon barely won the presidency.

At the time, it was CLEAR that Nixon's plan was to end the war immediately, as Bobby Kennedy and Eugene McCarty had proposed.

Nixon lied.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;This is why you are little more than a partisan hack.&#8221;</p>
<p>Were you around in &#8216;68 Price? Were you involved with the election campaign? Were you actively involved in the anti-war movement? </p>
<p>In &#8216;68, the American people had enough of Viet Nam - they wanted out.</p>
<p>After Bobby Kennedy&#8217;s death, the Democratic Party hijacked the convention and nominated LBJ&#8217;s VP, the hapless Happy Warrior Hubert Humphrey.</p>
<p>Nixon tried to capture the anti-war vote with his &#8220;secret plan&#8221; meme - many bought it - enough that Nixon barely won the presidency.</p>
<p>At the time, it was CLEAR that Nixon&#8217;s plan was to end the war immediately, as Bobby Kennedy and Eugene McCarty had proposed.</p>
<p>Nixon lied.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/cost-of-losing-is-even-higher-senators-say/#comment-329481</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 00:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/cost-of-losing-is-even-higher-senators-say/#comment-329481</guid>
		<description>WS Clark,

How is a plan to end the war, which ended the war... not a plan to end the war?

This is why you are little more than a partisan hack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WS Clark,</p>
<p>How is a plan to end the war, which ended the war&#8230; not a plan to end the war?</p>
<p>This is why you are little more than a partisan hack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WSClark</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/cost-of-losing-is-even-higher-senators-say/#comment-329478</link>
		<dc:creator>WSClark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 00:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/cost-of-losing-is-even-higher-senators-say/#comment-329478</guid>
		<description>"Last I checked, Nixon did end the Vietnam War."

In 1973 - five years after he was elected.

Hardly a plan to end the war.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Last I checked, Nixon did end the Vietnam War.&#8221;</p>
<p>In 1973 - five years after he was elected.</p>
<p>Hardly a plan to end the war.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/cost-of-losing-is-even-higher-senators-say/#comment-329476</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 00:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/cost-of-losing-is-even-higher-senators-say/#comment-329476</guid>
		<description>WS Clark,

Last I checked, Nixon did end the Vietnam War.  He brought North Vietnam and South to the Peace accords and when we had withdrawn they were no longer at war.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WS Clark,</p>
<p>Last I checked, Nixon did end the Vietnam War.  He brought North Vietnam and South to the Peace accords and when we had withdrawn they were no longer at war.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WSClark</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/cost-of-losing-is-even-higher-senators-say/#comment-329464</link>
		<dc:creator>WSClark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 23:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/cost-of-losing-is-even-higher-senators-say/#comment-329464</guid>
		<description>"They didn’t want to participate or collaborate with the United States, they were already in bed with Hussein."

Yeah, that was a blueprint for success - see the Colin Powell doctrine.

And, by the way, read the Lieberman/Graham editorial - it could have been written last year or the year before or the year before that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;They didn’t want to participate or collaborate with the United States, they were already in bed with Hussein.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yeah, that was a blueprint for success - see the Colin Powell doctrine.</p>
<p>And, by the way, read the Lieberman/Graham editorial - it could have been written last year or the year before or the year before that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Regular</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/cost-of-losing-is-even-higher-senators-say/#comment-329463</link>
		<dc:creator>Regular</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 23:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/cost-of-losing-is-even-higher-senators-say/#comment-329463</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Did we have the support of the international community?”&lt;/i&gt;

The international community was too busy lining their pockets with Saddam's "Oil for food" money for their secret weapons and supplies deals.  They didn't want to participate or collaborate with the United States, they were already in bed with Hussein.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Did we have the support of the international community?”</i></p>
<p>The international community was too busy lining their pockets with Saddam&#8217;s &#8220;Oil for food&#8221; money for their secret weapons and supplies deals.  They didn&#8217;t want to participate or collaborate with the United States, they were already in bed with Hussein.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WSClark</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/cost-of-losing-is-even-higher-senators-say/#comment-329462</link>
		<dc:creator>WSClark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 23:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/cost-of-losing-is-even-higher-senators-say/#comment-329462</guid>
		<description>"Sure did. We had to get out before the Kurds got gased."

The Kurdish village in Northern Iraq was gassed, with gas we sold Hussein, in the Eighties.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Sure did. We had to get out before the Kurds got gased.&#8221;</p>
<p>The Kurdish village in Northern Iraq was gassed, with gas we sold Hussein, in the Eighties.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hud</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/cost-of-losing-is-even-higher-senators-say/#comment-329461</link>
		<dc:creator>Hud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 23:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/cost-of-losing-is-even-higher-senators-say/#comment-329461</guid>
		<description>"Did we have a clear exit strategy?"

Sure did.  We had to get out before the Kurds got gased.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Did we have a clear exit strategy?&#8221;</p>
<p>Sure did.  We had to get out before the Kurds got gased.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WSClark</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/cost-of-losing-is-even-higher-senators-say/#comment-329460</link>
		<dc:creator>WSClark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 23:38:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/cost-of-losing-is-even-higher-senators-say/#comment-329460</guid>
		<description>"Duh Libs never learn - they just make matters worse."

Yeah, like that flaming liberal Richard M Nixon who ran for president in '68 on a "secret plan to end the war."

His secret plan was to expand the war beyond what even that idiot LBJ did.

Oh, and before you scream that LBJ was a Democrat - we disowned him 40 plus years ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Duh Libs never learn - they just make matters worse.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yeah, like that flaming liberal Richard M Nixon who ran for president in &#8216;68 on a &#8220;secret plan to end the war.&#8221;</p>
<p>His secret plan was to expand the war beyond what even that idiot LBJ did.</p>
<p>Oh, and before you scream that LBJ was a Democrat - we disowned him 40 plus years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WSClark</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/cost-of-losing-is-even-higher-senators-say/#comment-329459</link>
		<dc:creator>WSClark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 23:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/cost-of-losing-is-even-higher-senators-say/#comment-329459</guid>
		<description>"Exactly."

Why didn't Viet Nam end in "ten minutes?"

"Did we try to occupy Iraq the first time around? Did we have a clear exit strategy? Did we have a clear mission? Did we have the support of the international community?"

This is why.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Exactly.&#8221;</p>
<p>Why didn&#8217;t Viet Nam end in &#8220;ten minutes?&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Did we try to occupy Iraq the first time around? Did we have a clear exit strategy? Did we have a clear mission? Did we have the support of the international community?&#8221;</p>
<p>This is why.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Regular</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/cost-of-losing-is-even-higher-senators-say/#comment-329456</link>
		<dc:creator>Regular</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 23:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/cost-of-losing-is-even-higher-senators-say/#comment-329456</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Yeah, and that war was over in what - ten minutes?&lt;/i&gt;

Exactly</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Yeah, and that war was over in what - ten minutes?</i></p>
<p>Exactly</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WSClark</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/cost-of-losing-is-even-higher-senators-say/#comment-329455</link>
		<dc:creator>WSClark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 23:14:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/cost-of-losing-is-even-higher-senators-say/#comment-329455</guid>
		<description>"Trust Schwarztkopf, when he asked for no interference and went in and kicked butt."

Yeah, and that war was over in what - ten minutes? Did we try to occupy Iraq the first time around? Did we have a clear exit strategy? Did we have a clear mission? Did we have the support of the international community?

The similarities to Iraq now and Viet Nam then is that we have/had none of the above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Trust Schwarztkopf, when he asked for no interference and went in and kicked butt.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yeah, and that war was over in what - ten minutes? Did we try to occupy Iraq the first time around? Did we have a clear exit strategy? Did we have a clear mission? Did we have the support of the international community?</p>
<p>The similarities to Iraq now and Viet Nam then is that we have/had none of the above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Regular</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/cost-of-losing-is-even-higher-senators-say/#comment-329449</link>
		<dc:creator>Regular</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/cost-of-losing-is-even-higher-senators-say/#comment-329449</guid>
		<description>I see duh Libs are trying to bring back Nam. Kind of stupid of them to do that, because it was their Politicians and Policies that interfered with the military that screwed every thing up.

Don't trust me? Trust Schwarztkopf, when he asked for no interference and went in and kicked butt.

Now that we have the Iraq conflict, politicians, liberal news media and rag waving protestors are once again sticking their noses in and it is total chaos.

Duh Libs never learn - they just make matters worse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see duh Libs are trying to bring back Nam. Kind of stupid of them to do that, because it was their Politicians and Policies that interfered with the military that screwed every thing up.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t trust me? Trust Schwarztkopf, when he asked for no interference and went in and kicked butt.</p>
<p>Now that we have the Iraq conflict, politicians, liberal news media and rag waving protestors are once again sticking their noses in and it is total chaos.</p>
<p>Duh Libs never learn - they just make matters worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/cost-of-losing-is-even-higher-senators-say/#comment-329442</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 21:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/cost-of-losing-is-even-higher-senators-say/#comment-329442</guid>
		<description>Phantom,

The VC was equiped, funded, trained, and backed by the North Vietnamese.

Without that support the VC would have failed miserably.

Actually, most of the VC had been killed in the failed Tet offensive.

As the war progressed the numbers of VC went down as the numbers of NVA regulars went up.

With no one to support the ARVN, exactly what kind of fighting did you expect them to do?

Besides, when the ARVN collapsed those that survived rushed to help get their families to safety.

The North Vietnamese killed and executed nearly all government officials and anyone that could have posed a threat.

When your entire leadership is killed and you have no support what kind of jungle war are you supposed to fight?

It absolutely amazes me how ignorant people like you, Ben, and CapnAmerica are when it comes to the Vietnam war.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phantom,</p>
<p>The VC was equiped, funded, trained, and backed by the North Vietnamese.</p>
<p>Without that support the VC would have failed miserably.</p>
<p>Actually, most of the VC had been killed in the failed Tet offensive.</p>
<p>As the war progressed the numbers of VC went down as the numbers of NVA regulars went up.</p>
<p>With no one to support the ARVN, exactly what kind of fighting did you expect them to do?</p>
<p>Besides, when the ARVN collapsed those that survived rushed to help get their families to safety.</p>
<p>The North Vietnamese killed and executed nearly all government officials and anyone that could have posed a threat.</p>
<p>When your entire leadership is killed and you have no support what kind of jungle war are you supposed to fight?</p>
<p>It absolutely amazes me how ignorant people like you, Ben, and CapnAmerica are when it comes to the Vietnam war.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/cost-of-losing-is-even-higher-senators-say/#comment-329436</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 21:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/cost-of-losing-is-even-higher-senators-say/#comment-329436</guid>
		<description>phanton - they did.  Unfortunately for us they did so for the VC/NVA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>phanton - they did.  Unfortunately for us they did so for the VC/NVA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phantom</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/cost-of-losing-is-even-higher-senators-say/#comment-329422</link>
		<dc:creator>Phantom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 20:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/cost-of-losing-is-even-higher-senators-say/#comment-329422</guid>
		<description>If they were really committed, don't you think some of the ARVN's would have splintered into the jungles and adopted the VC's tactics?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they were really committed, don&#8217;t you think some of the ARVN&#8217;s would have splintered into the jungles and adopted the VC&#8217;s tactics?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phantom</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/cost-of-losing-is-even-higher-senators-say/#comment-329421</link>
		<dc:creator>Phantom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 20:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/cost-of-losing-is-even-higher-senators-say/#comment-329421</guid>
		<description>It's like the Son's of Iraq, their allegiance is only as good as the cash flow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s like the Son&#8217;s of Iraq, their allegiance is only as good as the cash flow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
