Get Your Credit Report And Score…

I’ve been a republican all my life until recently, and I’ve never believed in god or religion, I’ve never understood people who think the right is religious and the left isn’t. There are just as many church goers (actual beilievers?.. who knows.) in each camp. I figure when I see any politician bring up faith, they are pandering to the ignorant masses.

So,

MAN is now making the stuff of “God”?

Hell I’ve been saying that for years.

Kinda like obama throwing the lgbt community under the bus. Evangelical blacks = lots of votes. Gay folks, not so much.

Pandering is as pandering does…

Inviting McCain (or, hell, 3rd-party candidates, for that matter) would make it even better.

My only caveat: involve scientists in asking the questions, thanks. I wouldn’t want it to sink to crap like “can people ‘beat’ the polygraph?”

What was it you were saying about things we know to be true now that we’ve proven how credible a source you are?

Only that which is based on assumption and conjecture and therefore prone to being turned into political mush is what gets Linda out of bed in the morning.

Do you want Obama, Hillary, or McCain to actually say what they plan to do about it?

Yikes, what a concept.

At the same time—and perhaps not coincidentally—the fortunes of the nation have suffered and the prospects of many Americans, of the American Dream itself, have diminished. From bridge collapses to the failure to protect New Orleans (both before and after Katrina), these days the country can’t even seem to deliver upon the most basic of promises to its citizens—to ensure their safety. Along with the neglect of science has come a broader neglect of expertise, competence, and even functional government. These are, perhaps, matters not so disparate. For science doesn’t merely provide a way of expanding knowledge of the world. It doesn’t just provide answers to pressing questions; it changes the conversation itself. Science—and the broader way of thinking that comes with it—trains its adherents and practitioners to relish the very act of questioning for its own sake, of figuring out what’s true and false, of determining what works and what fails. Science can detect dark matter and dark energy; it can also build you dependable levees. By awakening to the full political implications of science and scientific thinking, the current crop of presidential candidates will stand a far better chance of being able to steer America back along the right course. The political currents are in place for a true scientific revival in this country, and Americans have the unique chance to host an election process that adds, rather than detracts from the public’s general understanding of all things scientific. Tired of Bush, Americans now have the opportunity to elect a new leader who is his antithesis—a president who understands how science works, and who surrounds him- or herself with trusted science experts so as to remain continually informed; one who grasps that scientific uncertainty is a fundamental facet of reality to be embraced, rather than to be exploited as an excuse for political inaction.”

http://seedmagazine.com/news/2007/10/dr_president.php

The next President will end the current administration’s disturbing legacy ends on January 20, 2009:

9 months 13 days, 22 hours, 18 minutes

They should hold it early in the day so’s as not to keep Senator McCain up to late. He gets cranky.

You wouldn’t like him when he’s cranky.

How about the science of converting manure into bio fuel?

Or perhaps the epidemiological implications of sexually transmitted disease in the work environment?

Oh wait…

I remember now what you’re interested in Randy Scholfield, Glooooooobal Warminggggg ..