Boarding plane should not involve pliers, pain

pliersPost-Sept. 11 airport security remains a work in progress, but this is ridiculous: Before a woman could board a February flight out of Lubbock, Texas, she had to remove her nipple jewelry, which required pliers. At least the Transportation Security Administration already has decided to change its procedures, which apparently were followed in this case, to give passengers the option to remove their piercings or be visually inspected. “TSA acknowledges that our procedures caused difficulty for the passenger involved and regrets the situation in which she found herself,” the agency said in a statement.

46 Comments

  1. Econ101
    Posted April 1, 2008 at 8:50 am | Permalink

    Weird? Yes.
    But I have seen some piercings that would be far more effective, as a weapon, than a simple box knife.

  2. Regular
    Posted April 1, 2008 at 8:54 am | Permalink

    Hmmm, maybe I need to retrain to Airport Security. :D

  3. ksfarmgrrl
    Posted April 1, 2008 at 8:56 am | Permalink

    I’m thinkin’ the same thing reg….

  4. Regular
    Posted April 1, 2008 at 9:00 am | Permalink

    oO, hehehe kfg :)

  5. lindainks55
    Posted April 1, 2008 at 9:02 am | Permalink

    They once subjected me to a “personal” search behind the screen because of underwires! Behind me in the line was a young man with an afro and stuck in his afro was what looked like an angel food cake cutter to me — guess it was some sort of comb. Anyway, it had long wire tines and he walked right on through. It’s all a show! I promise that man could have “pulled” his comb more quickly than I could have retrieved an underwire…

  6. ksfarmgrrl
    Posted April 1, 2008 at 9:06 am | Permalink

    Linda, dont you know that sharpened underwires (think shiv) are the weapons of choice for post-menopausal women everywhere?

    “Turn up the damn air conditioning or I’ll stab every freakin’ 20 something flight attendant. BACK OFF, I tell ya!”

    Powered by power surges…

  7. ksfarmgrrl
    Posted April 1, 2008 at 9:07 am | Permalink

    Hell hath no fury… etc. etc. etc.

    “We dont need no stinkin’ air marshalls”

  8. Nathan
    Posted April 1, 2008 at 9:08 am | Permalink

    I hate to break it to you liberals, it is your prevailing attitude of banning anything dangerous which brings about these types of things.

    The same attitude you have about guns and banning them carries over to fingernail clippers as well.

    I still remember all the arguments you liberals had against arming the pilots.

    Instead of common sense on protection this is what we get. We get some wierd policy on trying to ban anything and everything that could possibly be used as a weapon.

  9. Mary Caruso
    Posted April 1, 2008 at 9:10 am | Permalink

    OUCH!!!!

  10. ksfarmgrrl
    Posted April 1, 2008 at 9:10 am | Permalink

    Seriously though, what a joke. They can smuggle nukular materials through ports and airports, but nipple rings, underwires, and a fence around Mexico, not Canada where the only documented terrorist crossing have taken place, are what passes for “security threats”.

    Jesus WEPT!

    Let’s break what isnt broken, fix what doesnt need fixin’ and just invite the terrorists over for tea.

    Another day in bushco land where up is down, black is white, and we are all encouraged to live in fear.

  11. Mary Caruso
    Posted April 1, 2008 at 9:12 am | Permalink

    Apples to oranges, Nathan. It isn’t the “liberals” who are making the rules for homelamd security..you have your guy, Dubya, to thank for that.

  12. ksfarmgrrl
    Posted April 1, 2008 at 9:12 am | Permalink

    OMG Nathan, because, of course, it’s a well known fact that LIBERALS are responsible for the Unpatriotic Act… TSA… Unreasonable searches…

    Nice twist. You get extra style points for gymnastics, but the fantasy meter says you fouled out…

  13. Nathan
    Posted April 1, 2008 at 9:14 am | Permalink

    Mary,

    Bush isn’t making the rules either. I said the prevailing ATTITUDE… ATTITUDE is what brings this crap about.

  14. outlander
    Posted April 1, 2008 at 9:15 am | Permalink

    Glad that the Eagle keeps us abreast of these stories.

  15. Nathan
    Posted April 1, 2008 at 9:24 am | Permalink

    Simply put…

    Many, if not all, of these governmnet agencies are a huge bureaucracy. The President, or Republicans, don’t run every little aspect of every governmnet agency.

    Trying to blame Bush or the Republicans everytime is absurd.

    I don’t think that liberals are directly responsible either.

    I believe that the attitutde, which is held by nearly all liberals, contributes to the reasons why the TSA would consider the attempt to ban all “weapons” from the plane.

    The attitude that people can’t be trusted with weapons, only the government can be.

    Of course, the government, on it’s own, naturally leans this way as well. When you combine the attitude of many that weapons are bad and that the only one which can be trusted is the government with the governments attitude of a natural assumption of more power over it’s citizens you will have these types of laws and restrictions take place.

    I am looking at this at a much deeper level than simply blaming the liberals.

    And you know what the tragic thing is?

    The same people here, who are seeing how absurd the government can be with security, want to give that same government control over all our health care.

    So, don’t be amazed if I think you just don’t get it at all…

  16. Phantom
    Posted April 1, 2008 at 9:25 am | Permalink

    Some women even have piercings a bit lower down!

  17. Regular
    Posted April 1, 2008 at 9:27 am | Permalink

    Phantom, gives a whole new meaning to ’spread em’

    (waits to get slapped by the women of the blog)

    :)

  18. Posted April 1, 2008 at 9:45 am | Permalink

    We all know Middle Eastern terrorists wear nipple piercings that’s why they are dangerous. They didn’t have her take out her belly button piercing because that’s completely safe.

    Just another example of fascist goons throwing their power around like a bunch of dickless morons.

  19. ghotiphaze
    Posted April 1, 2008 at 9:46 am | Permalink

    I promise that man could have “pulled” his comb more quickly than I could have retrieved an underwire…

    I don’t know, Linda…I”ve seen some women drop those underwires mighty quick.

  20. Econ101
    Posted April 1, 2008 at 9:50 am | Permalink

    FarmGirl

    Hate to admit it, but you DO make me laugh.

    Thanks, I needed that!

  21. ksfarmgrrl
    Posted April 1, 2008 at 9:57 am | Permalink

    Yer welcome paul. Sometimes we must either laugh or cry. I chose laugh.

    And fish?

    “I don’t know, Linda…I”ve seen some women drop those underwires mighty quick.”

    Please forward names immediately…

  22. ghotiphaze
    Posted April 1, 2008 at 10:02 am | Permalink

    KFG, I thought you were spoken for!

    I know a few couples you might talk into tripling with.

  23. ksfarmgrrl
    Posted April 1, 2008 at 10:13 am | Permalink

    “I know a few couples you might talk into tripling with.”

    Funny thing that. Couples TROLL the lesbian and transgendered chat rooms and websites looking for a third party to join them. Put a personal ad up or chat for a while, and they come out of the woodwork.

    no thanks…If I wanted a guy involved, I’d have one!

  24. ghotiphaze
    Posted April 1, 2008 at 10:16 am | Permalink

    Not mixed couples, KFG, lesbian couples.

  25. ghotiphaze
    Posted April 1, 2008 at 10:19 am | Permalink

    If there’s an appropriate term, I’m not aware of it. I generally call them ‘the girls’, and when the wife needs verification which couple I’m speaking of, I shorten-link their names. I mean, which surname wouldya go by?

  26. J M Walker
    Posted April 1, 2008 at 10:23 am | Permalink

    Hey, being assaulted by some wacko woman with a nipple ring is no laughing matter . . .

  27. ghotiphaze
    Posted April 1, 2008 at 10:27 am | Permalink

    I remember getting stuck until I had my braces removed.
    (that’s my story, and I’m sticking with it)

  28. Nano
    Posted April 1, 2008 at 10:46 am | Permalink

    Nathan
    Posted April 1, 2008 at 9:08 am | Permalink
    I hate to break it to you liberals, it is your prevailing attitude of banning anything dangerous which brings about these types of things.
    _________________________________________
    Nathan, you can be such a moron. Paranoia knows no political affiliation. More likely, this is a result of bureaucracy gone amock.
    Please go back to hiding under your bed where the Liberals won’t get you.

  29. Posted April 1, 2008 at 10:55 am | Permalink

    OMGosh!

    Rhonda said (giggle, giggle, squirm, giggle) “nipple.”

    This thread is made for the puerile (and sexless) right-wing.

    Meanwhile our boys continue to die for nothing in Iraq . . .

    Laugh at that.

  30. ghotiphaze
    Posted April 1, 2008 at 11:03 am | Permalink

    Meanwhile our boys continue to die for nothing in Iraq

    Well, there is all that oil…
    Oh, yeah, and the freedom to kill anything that moves. It just ain’t fair that they shoot back!

  31. annie moose
    Posted April 1, 2008 at 11:05 am | Permalink

    future tsa employee?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uOVku86WfVg&NR=1

  32. ghotiphaze
    Posted April 1, 2008 at 11:07 am | Permalink

    LOL annie, that’s just too funny.

  33. Posted April 1, 2008 at 12:07 pm | Permalink

    Jeez, Price wants to allow weapons on airplanes. How are you going to tell the good guys from the bad guys?

    Just ask them?

  34. Jed
    Posted April 1, 2008 at 12:18 pm | Permalink

    Gee, if Nathan is calling Bush, Cheney Inc. liberal, we know how far he’s fallen into that right-hand ditch!

  35. annie moose
    Posted April 1, 2008 at 1:00 pm | Permalink

    Nathan,
    I’m sure your a wonderful person clean, well spoken and a credit to your race but shit happens, can you imagine this gal as a pilot with a gun?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L-Pc_3L71Gk

  36. annie moose
    Posted April 1, 2008 at 1:20 pm | Permalink

    another example of shit happens;

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D5BPQhDPJ2s&feature=related

  37. ghotiphaze
    Posted April 1, 2008 at 1:23 pm | Permalink

    Dang, if Nate were there, that cyclist’d have a full clip in ‘im in under 3 pedals!

  38. joel
    Posted April 1, 2008 at 1:56 pm | Permalink

    how much pain did this gal go through when she had the rings put in her nipples? maybe she was at a drunken orgy and didn’t notice the pain while they were being put in. of course the airline was going overboard by making her remove them. But then, I have a cousin that they took a pipe cleaner from as a dangerous weapon. overkill is the word. or, like we use for police, authority complex.

  39. ghotiphaze
    Posted April 1, 2008 at 1:56 pm | Permalink

    Personally, I listen to a lot of BBC. They have a whole different take on what’s happening on this side o’ the pond.

  40. ghotiphaze
    Posted April 1, 2008 at 1:57 pm | Permalink

    dang, wrong tab!

  41. Jed
    Posted April 1, 2008 at 3:34 pm | Permalink

    Of course they made her remove her nipple rings. Planes fly through thunderstorms sometimes and often carry children, and and the last thing they need is a woman lighting up like a lightbulb while experiencing that ultimate thrill in front of impressionable eyes!

  42. Sarah Bellum
    Posted April 1, 2008 at 6:47 pm | Permalink

    I was in a customs line in Dallas, and picked the shortest line. But there was a reason. The guy at the booth was the world’s slowest custom agent. You could tell he hated everyone and everything. Six people got through other lines while he processed one.

    Just as my turn came, he said. “I’m closing this line. You’ll have to go to the back of the next line.” At the same time, 300 people came thundering in from Mexico City.

    “####sucker,” I said under my breath.

    But he heard me, and pressed a button, and in no time, two stiff-faced gentlemen were escorting me to a special room.

    At last, I stood before a youngish, spanish/english speaking agent.

    “I here you think Agent Smith is a ####sucker,” he said.

    “Uh, er, Uh,” I replied, wondering how big his index finger was.

    “Well,” he said. “Agent Smith IS a ####sucker. Go on through.” I actually cleared customs faster that way.

    True story. I swear.

  43. Wiseman
    Posted April 1, 2008 at 11:01 pm | Permalink

    Your comment is awaiting moderation…???

  44. Wiseman
    Posted April 2, 2008 at 12:55 am | Permalink

    Commenter’ beware!!!, would you believe that their filter system will not accept the word “b00by” on the board.(using two zeros this time)
    I have entered twice on the board and it was censored.
    We’ll see if the third time is the charm.

  45. Posted April 2, 2008 at 8:11 pm | Permalink

    On a recent flight I observed in amazement how the screener poked an obese guy’s belly in 2 or 3 places (like the screen was asking “is this real fat?”), wanded over the guys arms, and then poked his belly again in 2 or 3 places.

  46. Posted April 27, 2008 at 6:08 pm | Permalink

    LOL

    WBR,
    Alex
    http://www.world-viagra.com – my favourite drug-store
    cheap drug-store

One Trackback

  1. By tsa on April 1, 2008 at 10:05 pm

    [...] At Orlando Airport CBS Newshttp://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,23471519-23109,00.htmlBoarding plane should not involve pliers, painBoarding plane should not involve pliers, pain Posted7 hours and 37 minutes ago Post-Sept. 11 [...]