I have to say, that I could not agree with you in 100%, but it’s just my opinion, which could be wrong….

It was far worse than I imagined. Absolute obsession with the trivial.

Max – Get rid of that delusionaal kool aid, before you hurt somebody or something!!

The fact that you respond to his posts about them being scroll over, proves that they actually are not.

Otherwise, you would simply not post in response to them at all…

And have a good night!

But I do not expect cons to understand that.

They talk with their guns. Likely they talk TO their guns.

There was death by hanging and shooting, and no lectric chairs or injections, etc……..

I suppose free speech only applies to those things which were available at the time the 1st Amendment was written.

I read the Constitution “Max”

And IT was written when there was nothing but muskets.

I need to find time to look for it. Something about Bush supporters and Iraq – can’t remember now.

In black and white, their words look very ugly indeed. (Listen to the Libs growl and scratch their claws.)

There is ZERO benefit to gun registration. Why do you support it? To make it easier for the Government to confiscate weapons, that’s why you support it.

Posting BS about the candidates? I posted THEIR OWN WORDS! (I cited the transcript source – check it out!)

Man you LIBS get really ticked at reading Obama and Clinton’s own words! Maybe you should support a different candidate!

Own some stolen weapons do you?

Maybe you in your zeal violated the Assault weapons ban and you know it is coming back.

Use your damn gun on your boss and grow a pair.

grmie means old John.

I should do a bonedig. Go back and find the love for old John before the right got stuck with him.

Yo cons?

You folks are all about consequences and personal responsibility.

Well it’s coming through the door, the windows, and down the chimney.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/04/the_pennsylvania_democratic_de.html

MR. GIBSON: Back to the Philadelphia Debate, the Democratic Debate, just less than a week now before the Pennsylvania primary.

And I would be remiss tonight if I didn’t take note of the fact that today is the one-year anniversary of Virginia Tech. And I think it’s fair to say that probably every American during this day, at one point or another, said a small prayer for the great people at that university and for those who died.

It also, I suspect, makes this an appropriate time to talk about guns. And it has not been talked about much in this campaign and it’s an important issue in the state of Pennsylvania.

Both of you, in the past, have supported strong gun control measures. But now when I listen to you on the campaign, I hear you emphasizing that you believe in an individual’s right to bear arms.

Both of you were strong advocates for licensing of guns. Both of you were strong advocates for the registration of guns.

Why don’t you emphasize that now, Senator Clinton?

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/04/the_pennsylvania_democratic_de.html

SENATOR OBAMA: Well, Charlie, I just have to respond real quickly to Senator Clinton’s last comment. What I have proposed is that we raise the cap on the payroll tax, because right now millionaires and billionaires don’t have to pay beyond $97,000 a year.

That’s where it’s kept. Now most firefighters, most teachers, you know, they’re not making over $100,000 a year. In fact, only 6 percent of the population does. And I’ve also said that I’d be willing to look at exempting people who are making slightly above that.

But understand the alternative is that because we’re going to have fewer workers to more retirees, if we don’t do anything on Social Security, then those benefits will effectively be cut, because we’ll be running out of money.

MR. GIBSON: But Senator, that’s a tax. That’s a tax on people under $250,000.

SENATOR OBAMA: Well, no, look, let me — let me finish my point here, Charlie. Senator Clinton just said she certainly wouldn’t do this; this was a bad idea. In Iowa she, when she was outside of camera range, said to an individual there she’d certainly consider the idea. And then that was recorded, and she apparently wasn’t aware that it was being recorded.

So this is an option that I would strongly consider, because the alternatives, like raising the retirement age, or cutting benefits, or raising the payroll tax on everybody, including people who make less than $97,000 a year –

MR. GIBSON: But there’s a heck of a lot of –

SENATOR OBAMA: — those are not good policy options.

MR. GIBSON: Those are a heck of a lot of people between $97,000 and $200(,000) and $250,000. If you raise the payroll taxes, that’s going to raise taxes on them.

SENATOR OBAMA: And that’s — and that’s — and that’s why I’ve said, Charlie, that I would look at potentially exempting those who are in between.