I enjoyed reading your blog. It is so interesting reading other peoples personal take on a subject….

It is a quite interesting post but quite difficult to understand for me -…

I enjoyed reading your blog. What a great thing it is to be able to share information like this on the Internet….

Please note that you are wrong.

The inspectors said the Iraqis were helpful during the inspections, and even proactive.

Please note that Saddam Hussein led the Arms Inspectors around by the nose to where, when and what he wished them to see.

Please continue to ignore the fact that even Inspectors acknowledge the fact that they knew that each delay and re-routing of their inspections was deliberate and concocted by Hussein.

Please continue to ignore the fact that the statements made way back in 1998 were BEFORE four nights of airstrikes (Desert Fox) in Dec 1998.

Please continue to ignore the fact that the 2002 statements were made BEFORE inspectors said in Mar 2003 that no WMD’s had been found.

cosmos, I continue to give you more credit than you deserve….my comment was tongue in cheek.
You continue to prove you are ‘an intellectual only in your own mind’.

He certainly didn’t talk me into this mess! I still have a sign reading “Keep the US out of Iraq” that’s been sitting in my front window since Jan. of ‘03, and is so faded now that I need a replacement. There are a lot of other people he didn’t flim-flam either, but not for lack of trying! I’ll admit that the run-up to the war was a masterpiece of propaganda and fraud, so I doubt that Bush had a hand in orchestrating it. He left that job to Cheney & crew.

Thank you for proving that you are too dumb to understand that the first goal of the AUMF was to get inspectors into Iraq. It’s also called diplomatic “leverage”.

March 7, 2003 | New York, USA
Statement to the United Nations Security Council
‘The Status of Nuclear Inspections in Iraq: An Update’
http://www.iaea.org/NewsCenter/Statements/2003/ebsp2003n006.shtml

The invasion of Iraq began on March 20, 2003.

A few of them are–Feingold and Wellstone (RIP) and Kuchinich and Jim McDermott and Max Cleland are.

Most of them are gutless enablers that allow Worst. President. Ever. to sh!t all over the Constitution.

http://www.state.gov/secretary/former/powell/remarks/2001/933.htm

We had a good discussion, the Foreign Minister and I and the President and I, had a good discussion about the nature of the sanctions — the fact that the sanctions exist — not for the purpose of hurting the Iraqi people, but for the purpose of keeping in check Saddam Hussein’s ambitions toward developing weapons of mass destruction. We should constantly be reviewing our policies, constantly be looking at those sanctions to make sure that they are directed toward that purpose. That purpose is every bit as important now as it was ten years ago when we began it. And frankly they have worked. He has not developed any significant capability with respect to weapons of mass destruction. He is unable to project conventional power against his neighbors.

That is the best that you have to offer???? HA HA

But they let some “Texas Cowboy” who fumbles his words, can’t speak well, who is an idiot, coke head, drunk, fool, ect… talked them into the war??? What does that say about democratic leaders you hold in high regard?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OSuWCIYi7T4

Maybe when he is out of a job, he will go fight it?

He could take James with him.

They got finessed into voting to give the “President authority to go to war” which instantly became “supporting the President’s war.”

In a sense they deserve it for not doing more to stop Worst. President. Ever.

But make no mistake, without George WMD Bush ramrodding this thing, it would have never happened.