Open thread 3/30

thread

135 Comments

  1. outlander
    Posted March 30, 2008 at 6:19 am | Permalink

    More from Mr. Reagan.

    “Those who created our country — the Founding Fathers and Mothers — understood that there is a divine order which transcends the human order. They saw the state, in fact, as a form of moral order and felt that the bedrock of moral order is religion. … The truth is, politics and morality are inseparable. And as morality’s foundation is religion, religion and politics are necessarily related. We need religion as a guide. We need it because we are imperfect, and our government needs the church, because only those humble enough to admit they’re sinners can bring to democracy the tolerance it requires in order to survive.”

  2. MonkeyHawk
    Posted March 30, 2008 at 6:27 am | Permalink

    “outlander” spews –

    “…our government needs the church, because only those humble enough to admit they’re sinners can bring to democracy the tolerance it requires in order to survive.”

    And, if the Gipper had been speaking of religion as a guiding moral force, rather than mere evangelical “Christianity,” he might have had a point. But that’s not what he was talking about and that’s not what today’s Cons talk about.

    As a matter of black-letter Constitutional law, the United States of America has to operate without the benefit of religious certainty.

    Nope. When it comes to governing this nation, people of all religions are welcome and encouraged to participate. But no one’s religion gets dibs.

    Play baseball as hard as you can and if you’re religious, use that religion to motivate your approach to the game. But you don’t get 4 strikes just because you’re a, say, Baptist. It’s not “2 strikes and you’re out” simply because you’re a Lutheran. Religion, even if it rules your life, simply doesn’t have a place in the rules of the game.

    That’s the United States Constitution.

    “If,” as Ben Franklin said, “we can keep it.”

  3. writerdog
    Posted March 30, 2008 at 7:45 am | Permalink

    You no more can get to heaven simply because you are a “good person” than does being a Christian mean you are a moral and honest person. “It is through your deeds that ye shall be known”, that does not only speak for Christians. But it also does speak to others of the value of your faith, if I claim to be a Christian and all the while I am raping your children and stealing your purse. Then I have not only reflected badly on my own character but on the faith of Christianity. You might vote for someone solely because they are seen as a good person. But you should never vote for someone solely because they claim to be a good Christian.

  4. MonkeyHawk
    Posted March 30, 2008 at 7:54 am | Permalink

    Just off the top of my head…

    Aimee Semple McPherson
    Lonnie Frisbee
    Oral Roberts
    Jim & Tammy Bakker and Jimmy Swaggart
    Peter Popoff
    Mike Warnke
    Robert Tilton
    Frank Houston
    John Paulk
    Douglas Goodman
    Kent Hovind
    Ted Haggard
    Paul Barnes
    Richard Roberts
    Bishop Thomas Wesley Weeks and Juanita Bynum
    Bishop Earl Paulk
    Phil Driscoll

    There are more.

  5. Posted March 30, 2008 at 7:55 am | Permalink

    Kudos to Crowson on his cartoon today. You will not be very popular with the Council, but I think you hit the nail right on the head! Thank you!!

  6. Hank Price
    Posted March 30, 2008 at 7:56 am | Permalink

    http://www.investors.com/editorial/editorialcontent.asp?secid=1501&status=article&id=291597352479337

    On a lighter note, tonight the Goracle will appear with Leslie Stahl on the left’s greatest propaganda/entertainment show.

    I’ll watch it for the in depth, probing questions that she uses to put him on the spot.

  7. Pepper
    Posted March 30, 2008 at 8:41 am | Permalink

    Leave it Hank to support apartheid in South Africa.

    Dimwit.

    (vomits)

  8. Door King
    Posted March 30, 2008 at 8:44 am | Permalink

    http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=990CE2DB1539F937A25754C0A963958260

    Offered without comment.

  9. Posted March 30, 2008 at 9:03 am | Permalink

    Good heeavens, Door King, you certainly have a propensity to kiddie porn defenses, huh? I think I could probably recommend a good therapist. Just ask.

  10. Nathan
    Posted March 30, 2008 at 9:26 am | Permalink

    Writerdog,

    Oh realy? You can’t get to heaven by just being a good person?

    Where are all the blog religion police at when you need them!?

    What a very judgemental and bashing statement to make against all those people who might just happen to believe that you do get to heaven by just being a good person.

    So tell me writerdog, how does one get to heaven if not by simply being a good person?

  11. J R
    Posted March 30, 2008 at 9:28 am | Permalink

    Keep up with the Reaganisms there outie.

    Always good to be reminded why I left the Republican party and never looked back.

    On the matter of Heaven? Sounds to me like a place populated by hypocrites who mouth the right admittance password. Not a place I’d care to go.

  12. writerdog
    Posted March 30, 2008 at 9:38 am | Permalink

    I have not watched it for some time mainly because it got so sick, “To catch a Predator”.
    They got where they were catching the same people over and over. “Stupid is as Stupid does!”, for the record, the article that DOOR KING linked to is not entrapment. Since the stated desire for older men is not directed solely to the defendant. Just because I would ask if anyone knew where I could buy drugs? Does not mean you would have to provide me with them!

  13. Door King
    Posted March 30, 2008 at 9:40 am | Permalink

    O.K. all you pissants who attacked poor old Door King because of his ideas/theories concerning electronic child sex predators, here is the definitive skinny, better than even Door King could ever express. But of course Door King was right. No one is after your figgin’ kids. 13-year-old girls do not invite strangers into their homes for sex. Dad or Uncle Bill is thousands of times more dangerous to your kids than people on the Internet. Internet sex predation resulting in actual contact is so rare it could almost be termed non-existent. You have been made hysterical by television for ratings so they can sell beans to bozos. Meanwhile, we’re spending millions to imprison moron losers who could have never succeeded in pulling off an Internet meeting with anyone of any age, except for a trained sting whore.

    http://www.cjr.org/feature/the_shame_game.php?page=1

  14. Tyler Durden
    Posted March 30, 2008 at 9:49 am | Permalink

    What is the deal with having to be a “member” to read so called news stories on the WE. WHen did that start? If they are not charging for the service, what is the reason, to limit debate, and to only keep WE for their whacko MSM liberal slant?

    This is a pathetic move.

    Later idiots!

  15. American, of the USA
    Posted March 30, 2008 at 9:58 am | Permalink

    J R,

    So if you don’t want to go to heaven, where do you want to go?

    There is only one you know,

  16. writerdog
    Posted March 30, 2008 at 10:00 am | Permalink

    LOL Nathan though some beliefs might not have the requirement, as Christians it is the firm belief that there is but one way to the Kingdom of Heaven and that is through Jesus Christ ( Of which you already know). But yes in a sense it does not seem fair, being a good person does not require one to be a Christian.
    And there are times it is not easy to be a good person, there are times it goes against human nature itself.
    There seems there should be some reward for doing it, but that too refers to human nature. We are all selfish to varying degrees.

    But then it does not mean that a good person also has to believes there is a heaven, a Hell or a God.
    Those are all a personal choice, its just to be a Christian you have to accept there existence. There is the abbreviated version of the Earth is Hell and once accepting Christ you will go to heaven when you die. But to discuss the differences between even the Christian religious beliefs would take more than a few days here. Christian and nonbelievers alike are all sinners, we are not special among others. It is God that is special, we are just a pile of dirt in the grand scene of things.

  17. ksfarmgrrl
    Posted March 30, 2008 at 10:06 am | Permalink

    “What a very judgemental and bashing statement to make against all those people who might just happen to believe that you do get to heaven by just being a good person.”

    huh. Silly me. All I remember from confirmation classes is that we are saved by grace alone, not through good works or good deeds. I thought that is why Martin Luther was such a problem. I thought good works alone did not save one. That you all are saved by faith.

    Guess things have changed over the last 40 years…

  18. Max
    Posted March 30, 2008 at 10:06 am | Permalink

    Al-Sadr acts real tough on Saturday 3/29:

    Shiite Leader Al-Sadr Defies Iraq Gov’t
    Saturday, March 29, 2008

    By ROBERT H. REID, Associated Press Writer

    BAGHDAD — Anti-American Shiite militia leader Muqtada al-Sadr ordered his followers Saturday to defy government orders to surrender their weapons, as U.S. jets struck Shiite extremists near Basra to bolster a faltering Iraqi offensive against gunmen in the city.

  19. Max
    Posted March 30, 2008 at 10:08 am | Permalink

    One day later, on Sunday 3/30, Al-Sadr backs down:

    http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,343231,00.html

    The Iraqi Government Welcomes Al-Sadr’s Orders to Pull Fighters From Streets
    Sunday, March 30, 2008

    BAGHDAD, Iraq — The Iraqi government has welcomed an order by Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr to pull his fighters off the streets.

    Government spokesman Ali al-Dabbagh told FOX News that the decision is “positive and responsive.”

    Al-Dabbagh said the move would “help the government confront those who are violating the law” and that it would help to “isolate those who are trying to destroy the government effort”.

    He said Iraqi security operations in Basra would not end until the “criminal elements” operating there are removed.

    Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr ordered those loyal to him and his Mahdi Army Sunday off the streets in Basra and cities across Iraq, saying that whoever carries arms against Iraqi forces is not one of his followers.

  20. ksfarmgrrl
    Posted March 30, 2008 at 10:09 am | Permalink

    …and in an amazing coincidence, Peg has some interesting comments on the subject of “god”. I think it’s about three posts down from the top.

    http://kansasprairie.net/kansasprairieblog/

  21. Max
    Posted March 30, 2008 at 10:10 am | Permalink

    Endless cease-fire deals with the enemy, does not end the war.

    History shows a great lesson of war: If the enemy id not defeated, killed or captured, or unconditionally surrendors, the war does not end.

    Al-Sadr and his forces need to be wiped off the face of the map.

  22. writerdog
    Posted March 30, 2008 at 10:10 am | Permalink

    JR in some respects I like the Mormon concept of Heaven where YOU are who defines what is in heaven and whom is there. If Heaven would be your son being there with you he would be there. No he would not be dead, he will be both places at the same time. Anyone or anything you want or need would be there. Your pet dog when you were 12 and the like. True it sound very idealistic and more wishful thinking. But then how is that different then the life you lead right now. You define what makes you happy or unhappy, you are whom you want to be and if not would change it.

  23. ksfarmgrrl
    Posted March 30, 2008 at 10:11 am | Permalink

    And for those of you anxiously awaiting Sunday dinner or game food…

    I have slow roasted beef ribs with dinosaur bones in them. Homemade bbq sauce cooked for 36 hours, and baked Yukon Gold potatoes. Beer on ice. Ok, well, beer on ice isnt traditional Sunday dinner, but it goes so nicely with game food!

  24. Door King
    Posted March 30, 2008 at 10:18 am | Permalink

    Hey Max, publish you mail address and I’ll send you my i.p.

  25. Hank Price
    Posted March 30, 2008 at 10:22 am | Permalink

    Hmmm. . .

    Homemade? Got a good buddy, T W White, lives in Orange County,TX. As far as I know I’m the only living human being he has ever shared his recipe with.

    It too takes at least 3 days. I haven’t made it in over twenty years. (Time restraints) It does have a little Jack Daniels in it and a lot in the cook to get it to come out right!

    We would normally start the sauce two days before we buried the pig!

  26. Door King
    Posted March 30, 2008 at 10:27 am | Permalink

    B52s will take care of the pesky opposition if we can find pilots to fly them. Won’t be a problem, no doubt.

  27. writerdog
    Posted March 30, 2008 at 10:32 am | Permalink

    MAX it is pure prospective, Al Sadar is more than likely thinking the same thing since he see us as nothing more that foreign invaders whom wish to occupy their country and end their way of life. And the Iraqis government as traitors to both the country and his faith. But it must end for our benefit and theirs, this has to be thought of as a hick-up and both sides need to agree on what it will take to end it. Contra to what some are saying about it is solely Iran’s fault. Al-Sada may accept help from Iran but is not a puppet of Iran.
    There is close to the same level of hatred between Al-Sada’s sect of the Shiite faith as there is between the Shiites and the Sunnis.

  28. writerdog
    Posted March 30, 2008 at 10:36 am | Permalink

    OH KFG I only thought I was hungry till I read that!
    Sigh I am having chicken tenders and chips… You are an evil woman KFG a mighty fine cook but evil!
    LOL!!! :>

  29. lindainks55
    Posted March 30, 2008 at 10:36 am | Permalink

    farmgrrl, you can make food sound delicious and I can only imagine how it tastes!

  30. ksfarmgrrl
    Posted March 30, 2008 at 10:42 am | Permalink

    HEE HEE HEEEEEEEEE!

    Hank, ya know I lived and worked in Orange, Jefferson, and Hardin Counties in Texas. So… it’s likely your friend and I may both make “golden triangle” sauce.

    I met lots of folks there from Wichita and surrounds. They had all been transfered from refineries here to refineries on the Gulf Coast. Refinery row and ship building row pretty much describes the area. Oh yeah, and the lumber industry in Hardin county.

    They dont call Lumberton Lumberton for no reason.

    Yep, I got my chops cookin’ down there.

    Wish you all were here. I’m eatin’ by myself today and rooting for rain. My ‘taters and ‘onions need it.

    New chicks arriving next week.

    Sorry to digress from the political!

  31. ksfarmgrrl
    Posted March 30, 2008 at 10:45 am | Permalink

    Heh Linda. You should read my menu descriptions from the restaurant. It made ME wanna eat there! But then, I have a slightly romantic relationship with food. I love it, am passionate about it, and when I write about it, it’s soft porn-like. Heheheh.

    But dont tell DK…

  32. Hank Price
    Posted March 30, 2008 at 10:53 am | Permalink

    Hey Farm Girl,

    T W retired in ‘85 and started on the drilling rigs. I retired in Feb of ‘86 and had a job with him just long enough to get severance pay, oil was $9 a barrel then and drilling wasn’t the career to be in.

    T W is a yellow dog democrat but a good sauce transcends politics!

    I’m thinking of getting some Khaki Campbells this spring, where did you order your chicks?

  33. lindainks55
    Posted March 30, 2008 at 10:56 am | Permalink

    “I love it, am passionate about it, and when I write about it, it’s soft porn-like.”
    ————–

    I think words and all things of true communication is passion.

  34. ksfarmgrrl
    Posted March 30, 2008 at 10:57 am | Permalink

    I lived in Beaumont from ‘85 to ‘88.

    Everyone in Orange county is yellow dog democrat. Or they used to be. I think that has changed since Jack Brooks has been gone :)

    A good sauce does transcend politics. Ask Solly about Rudy’s “sause”.

    I’m getting cornish cross from Orschlen’s. I dont order them. I wait and pick out the older healthier ones by hand, and let Orschlen’s feed ‘em for a week or two to weed out the weak ones. Heheheheh. It drives the help crazy to have to assist in the catching and boxing, but…

    I didnt lose one chicken last year to anything but the hatchet, with apologies to the faint of heart.

    And I’m partial to Buff Orpingtons.

  35. ksfarmgrrl
    Posted March 30, 2008 at 11:00 am | Permalink

    Hank, when I moved to Beaumont, the unemployment rate was 24 percent. One of every four or five people was unemployed due to the oil bust. Texaco was laying off thousanda at a time at the refinery. Oil was NOT the biz to be in.

    Now? It’s back to boomtown and the “Golden Triangle” talk. It had kinda tarnished and lost its luster when I lived there. Glad to see it’s back.

  36. ksfarmgrrl
    Posted March 30, 2008 at 11:50 am | Permalink

    Here’s an interesting piece about the barriers to poor folks eating local, fresh produce.

    http://www.sustainabletable.org/features/articles/index.html

  37. Posted March 30, 2008 at 12:04 pm | Permalink

    Sounds like a great program KFG…

  38. cosmos
    Posted March 30, 2008 at 12:04 pm | Permalink

    Hank Price posted March 30, 2008 at 7:56 am

    “I’ll watch it for the in depth, probing questions that she uses to put him on the spot.”

    Hank Price seems unable to understand that the climate scientists have asked the “probing” questions — and humans are causing global warming.

    That scientific consensus is explained in the study spun by Hank Price’s ‘Investor’s Business Daily’ editorial.

    Paul M. Kellstedt, Sammy Zahran, Arnold Vedlitz (2008) Personal Efficacy, the Information Environment, and Attitudes Toward Global Warming and Climate Change in the United States
    Risk Analysis
    http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01010.x

    IBD’s editorials are not credible.

  39. Posted March 30, 2008 at 12:11 pm | Permalink

    That is right Cosmos. Editorials, by their very definition, have the function of providing an “opinion” on a variety of subjects. They are not designed, or intended, to provide scientific analysis, or support scientific methods, or hypotheses. Oh, if Bloggers understood that!

  40. MonkeyHawk
    Posted March 30, 2008 at 12:17 pm | Permalink

    “ksfarmgrrl” –

    I was on the radio in the “Golden Triangle” in ‘79 and ‘80.

    Go a few miles east and you’re in Cajun country; like livin’ in a whole different country. I learned that if one Cajun likes you they all like you and if one Cajun hates you, look the hell out.

    It’s a long story but there were four times when Weldon Brousard showed up out of nowhere and saved my ass. He was my Cajun guardian angel.

    He took me along for a real bayou Mardi Gras. They traveled around various homes along the swamps an collected homemade sausage, crawfish, chickens, rice and brought it to what passed for a town. And while the old ladies cooked the gumbo in a vat, local bands played and I danced with more beautiful young brown-eyed Cajun girs than I could count. (Well, I probably could have counted them if I hadn’t been drinking so much.)

    I know Lumberton and had a friend who built his home on a sand bar of Village Creek. He used to say he knew every board in his house by its Christian name. Every spring the place would flood but he built his home on posts and merely stepped outside and rowed a boat to his car parked on a nearby highway.

    Beaumont, Port Arthur, Orange, Nederland, Sabine Pass, Vidor… every one of those towns had mom & pop groceries that had their own brand of barbeque, boudin, or sausage for sale. Vidor, Texas was the local headquarters of the Texas Ku Klux Klan. I was eating some pretty fair Cajun food in a place in Vidor when I overheard from the next table, “Just leave it on the sofa. I’ll take it in the house when I get there,” and I knew the sofa was on the front porch.

    There was an Italian restaurant, just up the stree from Janis Joplin’s girlhood home in Port Arthur where the little old lady turned her living room into a dining room. *Every* time I ate there she apologized because her sauce “wasn’t quite right tonight.” It was always terrific.

    Dunno what’s happened to the “Golden Triangle” since I lived there. But it used to be three graduate credits in Socialogy just for walking outside.

  41. Ben
    Posted March 30, 2008 at 1:00 pm | Permalink

    “our government needs the church”

    Actually – I AGREE with that. We need the churches to be the thorn in the side of the government. What we must NOT have, however, is the merger of church and state. In many ways that is what existed in European monarchys with the concept of ‘devine right of kings.’ In Russia the leader of the Russian Church crowned the Tsars. Just in the last decade in Serbia the Serbian Church blessed Milosovich’s wars.

    Even in some secular societies we have seen the same thing – for example in the Soviet Union Communism effectively REPLACED the Church and have Stalin similar absolute power.

    Power corrupts – absolute power corrupts absolutely. Keep Church and State separate and let them keep each other in line. Render unto Caeser that which is Caeser’s and unti God that which is God’s.

  42. Posted March 30, 2008 at 1:12 pm | Permalink

    Right on the money, Ben. I am reminded of an Old Testament story I heard a pastor preach on one time. It was about King David, and David’s lady friend, and how David sent her husband to the front lines of battle where he would be killed. And then the prophet, ‘Nathan’ confronts David with his mis-deeds, and asks what he would do to such a man. David, of course, condemns the actions.

    The Prophet then looks at King David, and says: “You are that man!”

    Good story – Absolute power corrupts absolutely!

  43. Regular
    Posted March 30, 2008 at 1:20 pm | Permalink

    Sorry, not posting – made some St. Louis Chicken and now I’m taking a nap…

    but…How y’all doing! :)

  44. Posted March 30, 2008 at 1:20 pm | Permalink

    O.T. reference to above post: 2 Samuel 12:1-15

  45. cosmos
    Posted March 30, 2008 at 1:27 pm | Permalink

    ‘Gore’s Message To Climate Change Skeptics
    Tells 60 Minutes That Doubting Global Warming Is Man-Made Is Akin To Believing Earth Is Flat’
    http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/03/27/60minutes/main3974389.shtml

    CBS tonight, 7 PM ET/PT

  46. outlander
    Posted March 30, 2008 at 1:49 pm | Permalink

    That’s sweet of Al Gore, cosmos. The Goracle is getting a little defensive isn’t he? I can understand since he is used to folks accepting MMGW as gospel. Now he is seeing his theories questioned and reacts by trying to disparage critics.

    He better get used to it.

  47. cosmos
    Posted March 30, 2008 at 2:12 pm | Permalink

    outlander,

    Al Gore is simply pointing out the reality. The science re AGW is very solid, and getting even stronger.

  48. Hank
    Posted March 30, 2008 at 2:41 pm | Permalink

    Hey Farm Girl,

    TSC used to have some, but they just order them now. We my be getting a puppy in a month or so and ducks help them get their little minds wired for herding later in life.

    ‘85 to ‘88? Hell, we could have been neighbors! I was single then, we could’ve gone out and cruised chicks!

    In ‘86 you could have made a good living in Beaumont by hauling U-Haul trailers back from California! I think at last count we’re drilling over 40 wells in Kansas right now, boom or bust, but at $100+ oil it will be booming for a while!

  49. Posted March 30, 2008 at 2:55 pm | Permalink

    Alright, damn it – if ya’ll are going to be ‘cussin’ dinner plans, here goes…………..

    Chili, named after my son since it is his favorite dish, includes, sweet hot Italian sausage, ham hocks, potatoes, kidney beans, stewed tomatoes, celery, garlic and mucho spices, hot sauce. The ham hocks are simmered in the pot for three hours, stripped and the meat added back to the pot. The dogs love the ham bones, so everyone is happy.

    Homemade bread.

    Cold beer, several.

    Basketball at 4:00 PM.

    More beer if KU loses.

    I hope AmWay doesn’t have me arrested for mentioning pot.

  50. Nathan
    Posted March 30, 2008 at 4:25 pm | Permalink

    I am actually rather surprised to see that the gun hating Editors have not created a thread about the evil machine guns that we will be allowed to own, according to federal law, which the House just passed.

  51. Regular
    Posted March 30, 2008 at 4:40 pm | Permalink

    U.S. doing better than Europe in reducing CO2 emissions.

    http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewNation.asp?Page=/Nation/archive/200702/NAT20070216b.html

  52. Songbird
    Posted March 30, 2008 at 4:52 pm | Permalink

    I’ve just returned from the 13th Avenue Warren Theatre, where I saw “The Other Boleyn Girl”. This film depicted the lives of Anne and Mary Boleyn, who both coupled with none other than Henry VIII – the tyrant who ruled over England in the 16th century.

    I once believed that parental indifference was the worst punishment that could be inflicted on a child. I was wrong. Way, way wrong. Having one’s own father and uncle pimp their daughters out to a bloated despot – only to be tossed aside when passion waned – is really, really toe-curling. As I exited the theatre, I was trembling and becoming overwrought.

    But it wasn’t because of “The Other Boleyn Girl.”

    No – it was a poster for an upcoming event at the Murdoch Theatre on April 18. A film will be shown which depicts the damnable crimes of one Roman Catholic priest. The disgraced pedophile/rapist will be interviewed. I’ve heard excertps of his purported “repentance.” It made my blood curdle.

    As an ex-Catholic and someone who experienced sexual abuse as an adolescent (but NOT as a child), I know this film will tear me apart. But the proceeds for this screening will be donated to an organization which helps those who have been abused. I feel I have a moral obligation to see this film.

    Then again – there are probably those who should see it more than I. Who are these altruistic souls, one asks? I challenge any member of Opus Dei, a Catholic offshoot to the right of the Pope in their beliefs, to see the film and remain convinced that their Church is beyond reproach.

    I challenge William Donohue, the belligerent and bombastic Catholic media whore who, like O.J. before him, believes that speaking very loudly makes him more believable (it doesn’t).

    I challenge ANYONE who believes the Pope’s ba–s should be encased in amber to view this film and remain unmoved. (Here’s a hint: The Vatican remained largely unmoved by these tragedies. That’s one reason I’m an ex-Catholic and will remain so.) How young was this errant priest’s youngest victim?

    See this film and find out. I can’t bring myself to convey it.

    I’m still debating on whether I should attend. The mere sight of that poster nearly did me in. But I just can’t help it. I’m an ultra-sensitive chick; I always WILL be a uber-sensitiva and; except for a five-year period from 1989-1995 which I termed the dead zone, I always HAVE been sensitive.

    And anyone who’s NOT sensitive to this sort of catastrophe isn’t fully human, in my view.

  53. Posted March 30, 2008 at 5:07 pm | Permalink

    I am positive that the gun nuts are working on some kind of “hunter’s guide” to justify why they need a machine gun to kill Bambi. I can hardly wait!

  54. Posted March 30, 2008 at 5:28 pm | Permalink

    Oh boy, racist pigs!

  55. Posted March 30, 2008 at 5:29 pm | Permalink

    From another thread >>>>

    Regular again LIES blatantly >>>>

    “:: is Chas/Daz/Sugar for sure, no doubt about it.”

    Folks, this is obsession! This poster needs serious help.

  56. Posted March 30, 2008 at 5:30 pm | Permalink

    PIG!!

  57. Posted March 30, 2008 at 5:46 pm | Permalink

    damn trolls!!

  58. ksfarmgrrl
    Posted March 30, 2008 at 5:59 pm | Permalink

    Hey Hank–Did you ever eat at The Boondocks on Jap Road? How about bbq crabs at Sartin’s in Sabine Pass? Duck Gumbo at Carlo’s? Good times.

  59. Posted March 30, 2008 at 6:04 pm | Permalink

    I’m really disappointed that Hillary’s “valor under sniper-fire” thing didn’t work out for her.

    I was looking forward to “I was the first on the scene at ground zero” and “I captured Saddam,” but alas, the pesky fact-checking press had to confront her and show how “human” she is . . .

  60. Posted March 30, 2008 at 6:05 pm | Permalink

    She has a vivid recollection of saving Private Jessica Lynch which we’ll never get to hear now!

    Thanks a lot, nit-picking media!

  61. Mary Caruso
    Posted March 30, 2008 at 6:14 pm | Permalink

    It’s not over yet, Capt…maybe she’ll catch bin Laden!

  62. Posted March 30, 2008 at 6:18 pm | Permalink

    According to reliable sources, the Blog will soon require Registration to post comments. Perhaps that will signal the end of the Sock Puppets. At least that is the desired intent.

  63. Posted March 30, 2008 at 6:22 pm | Permalink

    You see, IDIOT, that is where you are just plain WRONG!! Just cant fix stoooooopid!!

  64. Posted March 30, 2008 at 6:24 pm | Permalink

    According to reliable sources, the Blog will soon require Registration . . .

    Really, Square Peg? Where did you hear that?

    Regular of the many nics said it was going to happen in January. Obviously, it didn’t . . .

  65. Posted March 30, 2008 at 6:25 pm | Permalink

    As I said earlier today, I have no clue as to who Sugar is. I have never seen that nic here. But, I do know that Chas. will be around as usual.

    And I also know that if things on this Blog do not change, my advertising money will go elsewhere!

    And the WE would not like that!

  66. Rev Wright
    Posted March 30, 2008 at 6:28 pm | Permalink

    ::, ASK CHAS WHO SUGAR IS. CHAS KNOWS HIM.

  67. Regular
    Posted March 30, 2008 at 6:29 pm | Permalink

    #
    : :
    Posted March 30, 2008 at 6:25 pm | Permalink

    As I said earlier today, I have no clue as to who Sugar is. I have never seen that nic here. But, I do know that Chas. will be around as usual.

    And I also know that if things on this Blog do not change, my advertising money will go elsewhere!

    And the WE would not like that!
    ——————————-

    See ya then ::/Chas/Das/Sugar, don’t let the door hit you in the …

  68. Posted March 30, 2008 at 6:30 pm | Permalink

    To the Troll who posts under the name “Rev Wright.”

    Thanks for your stating your demeaning race-baiting and self-identifying as a right-winger.

    You prove our points for us, and far better than we could just by saying that “there are people like you.”

    What you call “black America,” we call America. What you call “gay America,” we call America. What you call “yankee or southern or hippie or leftist or atheist America,” we just call it America.

  69. Posted March 30, 2008 at 6:30 pm | Permalink

    And the meltdown has begun!! Just plain Crazy!

    REV WRIGHT, you are a troll, and a POS!!

    Go back to your bridge where you and your troll friends belong. You have already been reported as a racist PIG. I do hope you are pleased with yourself.

  70. Regular
    Posted March 30, 2008 at 6:33 pm | Permalink

    Points and laughs at ::/Chas/Das/Sugar as the more he writes, the more he reveals himself to be the same troll poster.

  71. Posted March 30, 2008 at 6:33 pm | Permalink

    Square Peg–

    Did an editor tell you that the WEBlog would start registering post-ers?

    Because their position used to be that the “home office” didn’t want them to use registrations . . . .

  72. Posted March 30, 2008 at 6:35 pm | Permalink

    Square Peg is not Chas.

  73. Regular
    Posted March 30, 2008 at 6:37 pm | Permalink

    What I want to know is when ::/Chas/Das/Sugar talked to the editors, was he wearing the collar or a necktie?

    Did the Editors make this revelation and if they did, ::/Chas/Das/Sugar couldn’t keep his mouth shut about it if it was true. He would have blubbered it out the first day.

    But, since this is my registered name on the Wichita Eagle, I have nothing to worry about. :)

  74. Posted March 30, 2008 at 6:37 pm | Permalink

    Yes, CapN. Had a chat with a couple of them the other day. They agree that things need to change on this Blog, or there will be some bad consequences. They believe a Registration system will solve much of the problem. But, alas, not all of the problem.

  75. Posted March 30, 2008 at 6:40 pm | Permalink

    Regular LIES about other posters’ identities. But screams when his name and address get posted on the Blog. How absolutely amazing!

    CapN, nice to see that Pat Herron is now trying to portray a “black” minister. :roll:

  76. Posted March 30, 2008 at 6:42 pm | Permalink

    Regular – I am NOT Chas. I do not know Sugar. And that is the end of that tune! Now STFU!! Troll Boy!!

  77. cosmos
    Posted March 30, 2008 at 6:43 pm | Permalink

    Regular posted March 30, 2008 at 6:37 pm

    But, since this is my registered name on the Wichita Eagle, I have nothing to worry about.

    Regular posted March 19, 2008 at 5:13 pm
    http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/03/open-thread-319/#comment-316172

    It looks like Brownlee won’t do anything with this blog, so I’m whipping out blog mayhem and torture.

    Be prepared to get ugly spilled upon you.

    Brownlee wants this blog to be amateur hour, well here it comes.

    You’ll never know when it strikes.

  78. Regular
    Posted March 30, 2008 at 6:44 pm | Permalink

    ::/Chas/Daz/Sugar,

    You had the opportunity to meet me at Denny’s on Harry to prove who you were.

    You turned it down. Free meal gone – too bad.

    As I stated before, the more ::/Chas/Das/Sugar writes on the blog, the more they “sound” alike.

    The style and same phrase usage is unmistakable.

  79. Posted March 30, 2008 at 6:49 pm | Permalink

    That was a really stupid thing for you to post, troll boy. Perhaps it is enough to get you banned from posting your vile filth here.

  80. Posted March 30, 2008 at 6:49 pm | Permalink

    Yeah, Square Peg’s and Chas’s writing style is not even close, but if Reg wants to harass people with his false claims, there’s nothing to stop him.

    Thanks for the update, SQPeg. I hope the editors follow up on this soon.

    I remember GMC claiming that he would no longer post if he had to register.

    No loss there, hehehehe . . .

  81. Posted March 30, 2008 at 6:50 pm | Permalink

    But, James, who would want to meet you? And especially at some dump like Denny’s? Guess you have no class at all! LOL :-D

  82. Regular
    Posted March 30, 2008 at 6:52 pm | Permalink

    #
    : :
    Posted March 30, 2008 at 6:49 pm | Permalink

    That was a really stupid thing for you to post, troll boy. Perhaps it is enough to get you banned from posting your vile filth here.
    ——————————–

    (chortles)

    What is vile?

    You mean the same thing as the Capn, J R and most all of the Libs accusing me of being other posters?

    Should they be banned as well? :)

  83. Regular
    Posted March 30, 2008 at 6:53 pm | Permalink

    : :
    Posted March 30, 2008 at 6:50 pm | Permalink

    But, James, who would want to meet you? And especially at some dump like Denny’s? Guess you have no class at all! LOL

    ————————–
    Because I know it’s open 24/7.

    Okay, meet me in the Wichita Eagle Lobby Monday Morning at 12 noon.

    Or is that too much of a dump for you? :)

  84. Posted March 30, 2008 at 6:58 pm | Permalink

    You seem to have a very strange obsession at work in your brain. You should really seek out some kind of help for that problem.

    I am Square Peg. I dont have time to meet low life like you. I pay more in Limo fees in a week, than you most likely earn in a month. What reason could I possibly have for wanting to meet you? I can think of nothing that such a meeting would solve. You would merely resume your lying. So, sorry, you strike out there, alleged crippled soldier.

  85. Posted March 30, 2008 at 6:59 pm | Permalink

    “himself to be the same troll poster.”

    McCluer admits to being a multi-nic troll, suing at least twenty different nics, yet he has the audacity to accuse others of the same.

    Since when do you get the be the blog’s sole troll, nic switching lying son of a bitch?

    (chortles)

    (pukes up dinner)

    (sends bill to McCluer)

  86. J R
    Posted March 30, 2008 at 7:09 pm | Permalink

    I wonder when James is calling that meetup of all those people in the nics he uses?

  87. Posted March 30, 2008 at 7:15 pm | Permalink

    He already did, J R, they meet in his bathroom while he chortles.

    It is a very sticky situation for all of them.

  88. Regular
    Posted March 30, 2008 at 7:16 pm | Permalink

    : :
    Posted March 30, 2008 at 6:58 pm | Permalink

    You seem to have a very strange obsession at work in your brain. You should really seek out some kind of help for that problem.

    I am Square Peg. I dont have time to meet low life like you. I pay more in Limo fees in a week, than you most likely earn in a month. What reason could I possibly have for wanting to meet you? I can think of nothing that such a meeting would solve. You would merely resume your lying. So, sorry, you strike out there, alleged crippled soldier

    ————————————-
    LMAO! Limos…

    Folks, this gets better all the time.

    Wow! :: even insults like Chas/Das/Sugar calling me an “alleged crippled soldier.”

    Guess no matter how much money you claim to have, there is no accounting for good taste and manners.

    So, what was your tax filing for the last quarter ::/Chas/Das/Sugar?

    You do file by the quarter right? Anyone with mucho dinero does that you know. :)

  89. Posted March 30, 2008 at 7:20 pm | Permalink

    I wouldnt know about Chas or Sugar or Das — My quarterly filing was just under $2.5 Million. Any more questions from the low life scum??

  90. Regular
    Posted March 30, 2008 at 7:28 pm | Permalink

    yeah right 2.5 million dollars, lmao!

    Writing styles are so telling.

    You know that ::, that claims not to be Chas/Das/Sugar doesn’t use an apostrophe “‘” on his contractions just like Chas/Das/Sugar doesn’t. :)

  91. Posted March 30, 2008 at 7:34 pm | Permalink

    “Guess no matter how much money you claim to have, there is no accounting for good taste and manners.”

    And what is your excuse for a lack of good taste or manners, McCluer?

  92. Posted March 30, 2008 at 7:40 pm | Permalink

    Regular is a low life scum and a Blog harasser!

    STFU Regular! While you still can!

  93. Posted March 30, 2008 at 7:41 pm | Permalink

    I suspect that I will give the Editors one week to put Registration on the Blog. After that, my advertising funds will go looking for a different venue. Good night all!

  94. Posted March 30, 2008 at 7:42 pm | Permalink

    Wright? I dont need your “gods” One of the great things about being an atheist is that you dont have to worry about offending an unseen, imaginary deity.

  95. Posted March 30, 2008 at 7:44 pm | Permalink

    Well, Wright, in the words of your buddy troll, Regular to other posters — Can you prove you are not Pat Herron? Huh? Go ahead. Prove it! LOL

  96. Posted March 30, 2008 at 7:46 pm | Permalink

    And what would be your excuse for blogging in Kansas, Reverend? (Ahem) No women friends? No youth groups to hassle for Jayyyzus? Bored?

  97. Posted March 30, 2008 at 7:52 pm | Permalink

    I suppose, Wright, that you are aware that you are using the name of a now-retired Pastor from northeastern Wichita? I wonder how that old fundamentalist type guy would like you using his name in such a manner on this Blog?

    Maybe I should send him Email?

  98. Posted March 30, 2008 at 7:53 pm | Permalink

    Ooops — I forgot, I already did send him Email! I sure hope he doesnt get mad at the Eagle for your racist posts earlier about Kansas’ beloved Jayhawks basketball team!

  99. Posted March 30, 2008 at 9:24 pm | Permalink

    WOW I am sure glad I have been tied up all day! What a mess you people have made of the Blog today!

    Oh well –

    Good night; Good luck;
    God bless; whatever you conceive God to be!!

    Blessings ALL! Blessings on the Blog!

  100. Nathan
    Posted March 30, 2008 at 9:27 pm | Permalink

    Good night blasphemer (Chas)

    May the one true God, Jesus Christ, whom you must have faith in to be saved, bless you.

  101. Posted March 30, 2008 at 9:48 pm | Permalink

    Nathan, you should really invest some time, and go visit the nice folks at Wichita Inter-Faith. It might open your eyes. Unless you have them intentionally super-glued shut! LOL

    Good night now!

  102. Posted March 30, 2008 at 9:49 pm | Permalink

    By the way, Jesus Christ is not the one true God, at least according to I Corinthians 15, where Jesus is placed in submission to GOD. Look it up for yourself, Bible jockey!

  103. Posted March 30, 2008 at 9:51 pm | Permalink

    Cf. I Corinthians 15:28

  104. J R
    Posted March 30, 2008 at 10:14 pm | Permalink

    If heaven is populated with such as Nathan?

    I don’t wanna go.

  105. Posted March 30, 2008 at 10:20 pm | Permalink

    LOL J R

  106. Nathan
    Posted March 30, 2008 at 10:39 pm | Permalink

    Chas.
    Posted March 30, 2008 at 9:49 pm | Permalink
    By the way, Jesus Christ is not the one true God

    And that is why you are no Christian.

  107. Posted March 30, 2008 at 10:45 pm | Permalink

    Post ALL of what I posted, Flaming Fundy!!

  108. Posted March 30, 2008 at 10:49 pm | Permalink

    Nathan, IF Jesus Christ is the one true God, as you say, then WHO is it that Jesus prays to in the Bible?? Does he pray to himself?? And if not, he would not be praying to the one true God, would he?? SO WHAT GOD DOES JESUS PRAY TO?

  109. cosmos
    Posted March 30, 2008 at 10:51 pm | Permalink

    I agree with J R’s 10:14 pm post.

  110. Posted March 30, 2008 at 10:57 pm | Permalink

    Let me help you Nathan >>>>

    http://anglicansonline.org/basics/nicene.html

    http://www.carm.org/creeds/athanasian.htm

  111. cosmos
    Posted March 30, 2008 at 10:58 pm | Permalink

    Nathan,

    Have you and your father carefully read all of,

    Paul M. Kellstedt, Sammy Zahran, Arnold Vedlitz (2008) Personal Efficacy, the Information Environment, and Attitudes Toward Global Warming and Climate Change in the United States
    Risk Analysis
    http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01010.x

    Or do the two of you prefer to instead rely on editorials that con you?

  112. Posted March 30, 2008 at 10:58 pm | Permalink

    Go back to your Cell Max, the hour is late!! LOL

  113. Posted March 30, 2008 at 11:00 pm | Permalink

    Max, read the links I posted… I doubt you are familiar with either one of those, or you wouldnt ask such a stupid, irrelevant question!

  114. Regular
    Posted March 30, 2008 at 11:03 pm | Permalink

    Anglican eh Chas/Sugar/Das/: : ?

    Just like CapnAmerica – interesting.

  115. Posted March 30, 2008 at 11:04 pm | Permalink

    And the great obssesive fetish continues!! You people are absolutely STUPID!!

  116. Posted March 30, 2008 at 11:06 pm | Permalink

    And James continues to be the LYING SCUM that he always is!

  117. Posted March 30, 2008 at 11:15 pm | Permalink

    When it comes to Heaven, I am going to the one with Jimi, John, Janis, Martin, George, Bobby, Max and Rocky.

    We will be partying like it is 1999……….. everyday.

  118. Regular
    Posted March 30, 2008 at 11:15 pm | Permalink

    #
    Chas.
    Posted March 30, 2008 at 11:06 pm | Permalink

    And James continues to be the LYING SCUM that he always is!

    : :
    Posted March 30, 2008 at 7:20 pm | Permalink

    I wouldnt know about Chas or Sugar or Das — My quarterly filing was just under $2.5 Million. Any more questions from the low life scum??

    #
    : :
    Posted March 30, 2008 at 7:40 pm | Permalink

    Regular is a low life scum and a Blog harasser!

    STFU Regular! While you still can!

    ————————
    Oh my : :/Chas/Das/Sugar, Jesus would not approve.

    ——————————
    John 8:56 “Jesus said to them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, before Abraham was born, I am.”

  119. Posted March 30, 2008 at 11:17 pm | Permalink

    So, McCluer, whyDID you deny being JM for over a year before you finally ‘fessed up and told the truth?

    Were you ASHAMED of the JM persona?

  120. J R
    Posted March 30, 2008 at 11:21 pm | Permalink

    James DOES have a lot to be ashamed of.

    More than is generally known….

  121. Posted March 30, 2008 at 11:23 pm | Permalink

    Well, Regular, at least you know what you are!! LOL

    I AM in Greek = Eigo Eimi

    Greek for GOD who said to Moses “I AM that I AM; Tell them I AM sent you.”

    Thus, Before Abraham was GOD

  122. Posted March 30, 2008 at 11:27 pm | Permalink

    You’re right JR — otherwise, James wouldnt be so obsessive about who I am, or in this case, who I am NOT!!

  123. Posted March 30, 2008 at 11:29 pm | Permalink

    Well, back to bed again!!

    Good night; Good luck!!
    Blessings ALL!!

  124. cosmos
    Posted March 30, 2008 at 11:43 pm | Permalink

    Not to mention that jimmymac could not support his false claim about the New Orleans levees, so he added a false, fictional paragraph to a copy/paste post.

    And also stole J M Walker’s nic.

    Jesus does not like liars.

  125. Posted March 30, 2008 at 11:44 pm | Permalink

    I notice that McCluer disappears when anyone mentions is JM version – he must be ashamed of that particular manifestation of his Sybil-like personality.

    I guess the “Blog Monitor” version will pop up next or maybe one of the Herron/Herroni brothers.

    Or maybe this time it will be Eagle Beak or Republikhan.

    .

  126. Posted March 30, 2008 at 11:46 pm | Permalink

    What with all of his flaming, he might have started a fire!! LOL

  127. Posted March 31, 2008 at 12:07 am | Permalink

    Damn, McCluer must have gotten scared and ran off with JM, Republikhan, Eagle Beak and the Herron/Herroni Brothers and their friends.

  128. Posted March 31, 2008 at 12:31 am | Permalink

    Sort of looks that way, Clark!! Nite now!!

  129. RD
    Posted March 31, 2008 at 12:57 am | Permalink

    And this is why religion has NO place in politics.

  130. Posted March 31, 2008 at 1:08 am | Permalink

    Right you are!!

  131. Steven Davis
    Posted March 31, 2008 at 1:29 am | Permalink

    This is an answer to outlanders dreary Reagan quotes. A good song from Woody Guthrie:

    PRETTY BOY FLOYD
    (Woody Guthrie)

    Come gather round me children, a story I will tell
    Of Pretty Boy Floyd, an outlaw,
    Oklahoma knew him well

    Was in the town of Shawnee on a Saturday afternoon
    His wife beside him in the wagon as into town they rode

    A deputy sheriff approached them in a manner rather rude
    Using vulgar words of language and his wife she overheard

    Well, Pretty Boy grabbed a log chain, and the deputy grabbed a gun
    And in the fight that followed, he laid that deputy down

    Then he took to the trees and rivers to lead a life of shame
    Every crime in Oklahoma was added to his name

    Yes he took to the trees and timbers on the Canadian river shore
    And the outlaw found a welcome at many a farmer’s door

    Yes, there’s many a starving farmer, the same story told
    How the outlaw paid their mortgage and saved their little home

    Others tell about the stranger who came to beg a meal
    And underneath the napkin left a thousand dollar bill

    It was in Oklahoma City, it was on a Christmas day
    Came a whole carload of groceries and a letter that did say

    Well, you say that I’m an outlaw, and you say that I’m a thief
    Here’s a Christmas dinner for the families on relief

    Well, as through the world I’ve rambled, I’ve seen lots of funny
    men
    Some rob you with a sixgun, some with a fountain pen

    As through this world you ramble, as through this world you roam
    You’ll never see an outlaw drive a family from its home

  132. Steven Davis
    Posted March 31, 2008 at 1:32 am | Permalink

    Yes, Max, bank robbery may be the best kind of socialism! :)

  133. Songbird
    Posted March 31, 2008 at 5:21 am | Permalink

    It’s too early to post on today’s Open Thread – so I gotta post here. I got an urgent query for the dude callin’ himself “Reverend Wright.”

    Dude! Let’s go back in time to 1994-1995, shall we? Do you think O.J. was guilty or…..if ya don’t think he’s guilty, who do you think slashed Ron & Nicole to death? Was it someone with his EXACT DNA……and his EXACT blood spatters all over the crime scene…..and the EXACT DNA of the victims at his crib? Was it someone ELSE who kept gettin’ his a$$ hauled into court for domestic violence? Was it someone ELSE whom the Songbird observed on a 1985 video – braggin’ about rapin’ Nicole on their first date?

    “Hey, that how we ended up gettin’ married!” the NFL has-been bellowed while a sycophant giggled, cooed, and did everything except fe—–. Oh, never mind – that’s too gross to even contemplate.

    Are you proud of someone who set race relations back hundreds of years – and killed two people in the process?

    Tell us your secret – ’cause a whole lot of us find the KKK repulsive. You couldn’t PAY us to give them our fealty. But a whole lotta African-Americans stood behind O.J. The fact that he may have been guilty didn’t mean anything to ‘em.

    And that’s just kinda gross, if you ask me. But then, you’re a mighty man of gawd, now aren’t you? You must have an answer for everthing!

    Gawd bless you!

  134. baldy
    Posted March 31, 2008 at 5:47 am | Permalink

    Chas for a man of God your lack of the basic knowledge astounds me. As Nathan said there is one God. This is the the very foundation of the Christian faith.

    The doctrine of the Trinity — that God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit are each equally and eternally the one true God — is admittedly difficult to comprehend, and yet is the very foundation of Christian truth. Although skeptics may ridicule it as a mathematical impossibility, it is nevertheless a basic doctrine of Scripture as well as profoundly realistic in both universal experience and in the scientific understanding of the cosmos.

    Both Old and New Testaments teach the Unity and the Trinity of the Godhead. The idea that there is only one God, who created all things, is repeatedly emphasized in such Scriptures as Isaiah 45:18:

    “For thus saith the Lord that created the heavens; God himself that formed the earth and made it; …I am the Lord; and there is none else.”

    A New Testament example is James 2:19:

    “Thou believest that there is one God; thou doest well; the devils also believe, and tremble.”

    The three persons of the Godhead are, at the same time, noted in such Scriptures as Isaiah 48:16:

    “I have not spoken in secret from the beginning; From the time that it was, there am I; and now the Lord God, and his Spirit, hath sent me.”

    The speaker in this verse is obviously God, and yet He says He has been sent both by The Lord God (that is, the Father) and by His Spirit (that is, the Holy Spirit).

    The New Testament doctrine of the Trinity is evident in such a verse as John 15:26, where the Lord Jesus said:

    “But when the Comforter is come whom I will send unto you from the Father, He shall testify of me.”

    Then there is the baptismal formula:

    “baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost” (Matthew 28:19).

    One name (God) — yet three names!

    JESUS — That Jesus, as the only-begotten Son of God, actually claimed to be God, equal with the Father, is clear from numerous Scriptures. For example, He said:

    “I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the ending, saith the Lord, which is, and which was, and which is to come, the Almighty” (Revelation 1:8).

    HOLY SPIRIT — Some cults falsely teach that the Holy Spirit is an impersonal divine influence of some kind, but the Bible teaches that He is a real person, just as are the Father and the Son. Jesus said:

    “Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth: for he shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak; and he will show you things to come” (John 16:13).

    TRI-UNITY — The teaching of the Bible concerning the Trinity might be summarized thus. God is a Tri-unity, with each Person of the Godhead equally and fully and eternally God. Each is necessary, and each is distinct, and yet all are one. The three Persons appear in a logical, causal order. The Father is the unseen, omnipresent Source of all being, revealed in and by the Son, experienced in and by the Holy Spirit. The Son proceeds from the Father, and the Spirit from the Son. With reference to God’s creation, the Father is the Thought behind it, the Son is the Word calling it forth, and the Spirit is the Deed making it a reality.

    We “see” God and His great salvation in the Son of God, the Lord Jesus Christ, then “experience” their reality by faith, through the indwelling presence of His Holy Spirit.

    Though these relationships seem paradoxical, and to some completely impossible, they are profoundly realistic, and their truth is ingrained deep in man’s nature. Thus, men have always sensed first the truth that God must be “out there,” everywhere present and the First Cause of all things, but they have corrupted this intuitive knowledge of the Father into pantheism and ultimately into naturalism.

    Similarly, men have always felt the need to “see” God in terms of their own experience and understanding, but this knowledge that God must reveal Himself has been distorted into polytheism and idolatry. Men have thus continually erected “models” of God, sometimes in the form of graven images, sometimes even in the form of philosophical systems purporting to represent ultimate reality.

    Finally, men have always known that they should be able to have communion with their Creator and to experience His presence “within.” But this deep intuition of the Holy Spirit has been corrupted into various forms of false mysticism and fanaticism, and even into spiritism and demonism. Thus, the truth of God’s tri-unity is ingrained in man’s very nature, but he has often distorted it and substituted a false god in its place.

    http://www.christiananswers.net/q-eden/edn-t002.html

  135. RD
    Posted March 31, 2008 at 7:38 am | Permalink

    The “Trinity” idea is nothing more than another idea taken from the old religions. If you knew the history of your religion, baldy, you’d know that Christianity has very little that hasn’t done before.

    Wash, rinse, repeat.

4 Trackbacks

  1. By nelly fertado lyrics on April 9, 2008 at 12:00 am

    nelly fertado lyrics…

    Man i just love your blog, keep the cool posts comin…..

  2. By mortgage lead source on April 10, 2008 at 5:06 am

    mortgage lead source…

    Well spoken. I have to research more on this as it is really vital info….

  3. By Sex Gay Sex Anime Sex on April 10, 2008 at 8:54 pm

    Sex Gay Sex Anime Sex…

    I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view…

  4. By bathroom bathroom models on April 13, 2008 at 3:59 am

    bathroom bathroom models…

    I just came across your blog and wanted to drop you a note telling you how impressed I was with the information you have posted here. I also have websites & blogs so I know what I am talking about when I say your site is top-notch! Keep up the great w…