Obama speech bold, moving, grown-up

obamaracespeech.jpgBarack Obama didn’t take the safe route and simply denounce some inflammatory statements made by his pastor. In a bold, moving and, frankly, grown-up speech today in Philadelphia, Obama went much further in discussing the racial divides in our country, their causes and the hope for continuing to make our nation a more perfect union. He discussed how issues and people, including his pastor, are more complicated than caricatures being pushed by those on the right and left, and how ignoring wounds won’t make them heal. He argued that we have a choice: We can continue to accept “a politics that breeds division and conflict and cynicism,” or we can come together and realize that we share many of the same challenges and aspirations.
“In the end, then, what is called for is nothing more, and nothing less, than what all the world’s great religions demand — that we do unto others as we would have them do unto us,” Obama said. “Let us be our brother’s keeper, Scripture tells us. Let us be our sister’s keeper. Let us find that common stake we all have in one another, and let our politics reflect that spirit as well.”

429 Comments

  1. Ksgrm
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 11:35 am | Permalink

    To little to late in my opinion. Shows a lack of discernment sorely needed in a prez. I like Obama personally and feel he has energized many young voters. A good thing. I am greatly concerned about his and his wifes attitudes which mirror those of Wright in many respects. Michelle’s comment that for the first time in her life she can be proud of her country is deeply disturbing. MOHO

  2. Posted March 18, 2008 at 11:36 am | Permalink

    Actions speak louder than words. This is especially true for politicians who often say one thing during a campaign and another in office.

    He and his family sat in those pews for 20 years listening to racist anti-american garbage. The ‘pastor’ was a mentor and close associate. Anyone else would have packed up and found another church. One not lead by a racist.

    Obama is not presidential timber.

  3. GMC70
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 11:43 am | Permalink

    “Grown-up?” What does that mean? Is that the equivalent of refering to him as (gasp) “articulate?”

  4. Posted March 18, 2008 at 11:44 am | Permalink

    I’m stunned.

    “ksgrm” and “ProudMan” are still anti-Obama.

    You could knock me over with a truck.

  5. Andy
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 11:45 am | Permalink

    Not surprised to see this comments come from Kansas a typically racist redneck state. Congrats on your bigotry and hillbillyness

  6. Ksgrm
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 11:48 am | Permalink

    MH I was never anti Obama. Ck my posts. I have said in the past that he seems almost too naive for the prez but that has been my only objection. Look before leaping. It might save you a sore neck.

  7. Ksgrm
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 11:49 am | Permalink

    Andy why not say what you really think. Your post was just drivel with nothing of merit.

  8. J R
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 11:57 am | Permalink

    AGAIN he made with the praise for Republicans and conservatives!

    Obama has to be the most inept politician in history.

  9. TDT
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 12:00 pm | Permalink

    Proudman – Your generalities show your ignorance. He did not sit in the pews listening to racist rhetoric for 20 years.

    JR – I’d be careful calling him an inept politician, considering he is currently in the lead against Clinton.

  10. littlejohn
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 12:01 pm | Permalink

    I thought the speech was quite good, and had many truths to it. However, one he left out was the effect on the black community of black hate mongers and race prostitutes like Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, and yes, The Reverend Wright. Their constant point to the whitey as the source of their problems only leads to to despair, and lack of introspection on the part of black America. To fix the cause of your problem outside your influence, removes any hope of changing your situation. Lack of hope breeds despair, despair breeds hate, hate breeds violence. THis is the true crime that the likes of Jackson, Sharpton, and apparently Wright has committed. Although from what I can tell, Wright has committed this to a far less degree, and practices what he preaches about taking care of his fellow man.
    Still, I think it would have been a great part to acknowledge this fact in such a “momentous” speech about race.

  11. Ksgrm
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 12:01 pm | Permalink

    Andy how can you be grown up after setting for 20 years and listening to the hate filled sermons of your minister and you only ’see the light’ after the public hears this man’s sermons and you just happen to be running for POTUS.

    He had no choice. He took the only chance he had and hope it would grow legs. Only in Brownlee’s lib world.

  12. Posted March 18, 2008 at 12:01 pm | Permalink

    Strange, J R.

    If he’s so inept, why is he kicking the Queen of Mean’s ass?

    Obama is showing exactly how to win this thing: take the right-wing smear and show how it’s destroying the political process–which is exactly what it’s doing.

    Make the hate-mongers the problem (which they are) and overcome them by standing above them.

  13. J R
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 12:07 pm | Permalink

    Seen a poll lately Capn?

    Obama is becoming a liability to the Democratic party. I wonder how much else there is about him to discover?

    I for one will be looking for it. This is too important a time for Obama to skate in on a media love affair. I don’t trust him.

  14. Ksgrm
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 12:08 pm | Permalink

    TDT
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 12:00 pm | Permalink
    Proudman – Your generalities show your ignorance. He did not sit in the pews listening to racist rhetoric for 20 years.

    By his own admission he has belonged to this church for 20 years. Where do you think he was sitting during these years?

  15. lindainks55
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 12:09 pm | Permalink

    I am personally proud an American of his intelligence is willing to serve our country. He will have a positive influence whether he is or isn’t elected president this fall.

    “Do unto others as we would have them do unto us.” We all need to reflect and make sure we individually are accepting our responsibilities as citizens of a nation that includes everyone and should be fair to everyone.

    I think we will see greatness from this man.

  16. Hank Price
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 12:13 pm | Permalink

    It will be intereting to see how this speech on race in America benefits him in the polls.

    I really didn’t see much in it other than more of the same old liberal claptrap.

    I think the mulatto mesiah may have peaked.

  17. Posted March 18, 2008 at 12:17 pm | Permalink

    When did Wright ever say anything racist? Are the people claiming Wright is a racist the same people who claimed Obama is a Muslim?

  18. Posted March 18, 2008 at 12:17 pm | Permalink

    The reason that black denunciations of white society resonate so strongly and are met with such a fierce backlash is because we know in our hearts, the blacks are right.

    The systematic discrimination we’ve shown to the African-American over the centuries cannot be denied. The petty tokenism (like affirmative-action) that we propose as a way of recompense is far too little, too late.

    White America refuses to face up to what it’s done because it is just too painful and difficult.

    Far easier just to blame the victims for their lack of “individual responsibility.”

  19. Hank Price
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 12:18 pm | Permalink

    The democrats are running left and lefter in a country that elects center right presidents. To win all McCain has to do is point out that Obama is further to the left than any Senator or any other national politician in history.

    The fact that he is black holds no relevence.

  20. Posted March 18, 2008 at 12:18 pm | Permalink

    If Hank is against it, you know it’s good.

    That’s proof positive.

  21. Posted March 18, 2008 at 12:19 pm | Permalink

    McCain is Bush’s third term.

    Sorry, Hank.

    There just aren’t that many stupid people left. They’ve wised up . . .

  22. Tre'
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 12:21 pm | Permalink

    I see throughout the blogosphere that the Clinton and Republican supporters watched the speech with the mute button on. And it is clear that they have made the choice to further the racial divide in America.

    I used to get upset, now I just smile and feel sorry for such ignorance and arrogance. I pray for the Americans in this country who care more about race than they do their children’s future in this country. Most of the anti-Obama comments posted here come from those who have lazy, uneducated thoughts! In a way, I’m glad Rev. Wright’s offensive remarks have been broadcasted throughout America. It has exposed the ignorance and arrogance of those who think they are the deciders of this country.

  23. Posted March 18, 2008 at 12:22 pm | Permalink

    Good post, Tre’.

    Thanks for that.

  24. J R
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 12:23 pm | Permalink

    Oh come now Capn!

    You and Hank should be holding hands according to Obama!

    Not me. No thanks.

  25. J R
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 12:24 pm | Permalink

    Well racism is no more attractive when it is in reverse.

    And not all that more justified.

  26. Ksgrm
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 12:24 pm | Permalink

    Cap you are wrong for so many reasons that I can’t list them all here. The democratic party led by Bill Clinton was the first racist attack on Obama. Don’t ignore the truth in your rush to blame repubs.

    Linda I too expect great things from this man just not in this election cycle. He is collecting to much baggage to carry to the Whitehouse.

  27. Posted March 18, 2008 at 12:25 pm | Permalink

    “Do unto others as we would have them do unto us” is liberal claptrap to bible-beating Hank Price.

    Ditto for the Sermon on the Mount, apparently.

    Now, the part about “an eye for an eye!” hell, yeah, right Hank?

  28. Ben
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 12:25 pm | Permalink

    At least he didn’t go along with Romney’s idea that it doesn’t matter what version of Christian you are AS LONG AS YOU ARE CHRISTIAN! Seems he realizes that many of us became ‘unchurched’ for a reason.

  29. Ksgrm
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 12:27 pm | Permalink

    Cap which part of the sermon on the mount were you referring to?

  30. Ksgrm
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 12:28 pm | Permalink

    Ben which party is Romney the front runner for prez?

  31. Posted March 18, 2008 at 12:29 pm | Permalink

    J R–

    Please don’t tell me that you’ve bought into the radical-right LIE of “reverse racism.”

    When did a black banker ever deny you a loan because you were white? When did a black neighborhood say that you can’t live there because you are white? Or rent an apartment because you are white? When did a taxi NOT PICK YOU up because you are white? When did black customers ever complain that they wanted a waiter who wasn’t white?

    You can’t have systematic racism unless you are in a position of power to impose that racism.

    Racism is not an “idea” of superiority–it’s an act of discrimination that harms others based on race.

  32. LH Dallas
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 12:32 pm | Permalink

    Come on, America, grow up. After reading blogs on multiple websites, I cannot believe that people don’t get it. Do you really believe that we should “throw away” every friend, relative, and offspring who makes a statement with which we disagree? Would you disown every child or relative who holds a belief different from your own? Then, why do you think it important for Obama to do that?

    It is better that we address these differences (like he just did) in simple, very clear language, explaining why we denounce or repudiate the message so we can help each other and work together as a people. Throwing out the baby with the bath water is not the answer. I thought Obama’s speech was brave, insightful, intelligent, and proved to me that he is the best person we could hope to have as our president. We would be so fortunate.

    Obama 08

  33. Nathan
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 12:35 pm | Permalink

    All of a sudden it is ok to quote scripture and talk about Jesus… when you are a Democrat.

    If a Republican was out there quoting scripture and talking about Jesus, the media, Liberals, and Democrats would be crying about what a religious nut case he was!

    The Eagle Editors wouldn’t be calling a Republican “grown up, bold, or moving” they would be pointing out the question of seperation of church and state.

  34. Posted March 18, 2008 at 12:36 pm | Permalink

    Capn,

    You have confused racism with oppression and discrimination. Try looking them up. A racist is a racist is a racist. There are no boundaries of position, power, race, creed, or color. A racist is a racist.

  35. Posted March 18, 2008 at 12:39 pm | Permalink

    Those that are criticizing Obama over the church he attends would NOT vote for Barack anyway, under any circumstance. This is just another “let’s build him up and see if we can knock him down” scenario.

    I am sure that if David Duke were running for President, many on the right here would vote for him over Obama, regardless.

    There is nothing here – this story has no more legs than the “Obama is a secret Muslim” nonsense.

  36. lee from Treasure Island Fl
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 12:40 pm | Permalink

    Everyone who thinks the remarks of Rev Wright are any different than any other preacher, minister, priest or revernd of today is fooling themselves.
    Google any well known famous religious person…their quotes are racist, bigotry, hateful, anti American and sometime riot inducing. Try Pat Roberston, Jerry Falwell, or John Hagee…all guest at the White House over the years, and advisors. Turn on your TV, your radio…listen. There is good in everyone…and racism in all of us. That is all Obama was saying. Look in your mirror, look at your spiritual leader…do you not see it…do you not hear it?

  37. Nathan
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 12:41 pm | Permalink

    CapnAmerica,

    So what about a student who scores higher on tests and is more qualified on an acceptance into a school and is then turned down for a less qualified person simply because that person is black?

    Oh thats right, Racism (Affirmative Action) is ok then.

  38. J R
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 12:45 pm | Permalink

    Well I’ve done my share of defending Obama.

    But no more. I think he has gotten WAY to big a pass from the media to this point. I hate to think what else will be found now .

  39. Siam
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 12:48 pm | Permalink

    Those who are refusing to see the freshness of Obama’s speech and the historic nature of it are are those who hate him regardless of what he does or say. Barack’s speech was brilliant, sound, analytical and historical profound for its breadth and delivery. Its the long awaited medicine needed in this country to help address the issue of racism in this country. God bless Barack and God bless the world

  40. Hank Price
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 1:12 pm | Permalink

    Good morning Capn.!

    #
    CapnAmerica
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 12:19 pm | Permalink

    McCain is Bush’s third term.

    Sorry, Hank.

    There just aren’t that many stupid people left. They’ve wised up . . .

    What mkes you think that running a Senator that is further to the left of Lurch, the defeated opponent of ’second-term-Bush’ is the answer?

    Amazing! The radical left has no idea how the democrats lost the Whitehouse in 2004 and managed to win the Congress in 2006!

    (Hint: Running a socialist is not the answer!)

  41. Trini
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 1:13 pm | Permalink

    @ Ksgrm:

    Do you honestly believe that

    1. Rev. Wright, for some 20+ years would have been preaching “hate filled surmons”?
    … in fact scratch that …

    One question … have you “listened” to what the Rev. said? … not heard, “listened”?

    Please identify via a transpict of this *single* clip of the entire man’s career, what was said is his speech that was either racest or untrue.

  42. Bruce Blank
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 1:16 pm | Permalink

    I have listened very carefully to Mr. Obama’s speech and I, for one, am sad that BOTH Barrack’s examination and the blog commentators thus far have missed the central core of current racial divide:

    Poverty.

    Poverty breeds resentment, despiration and inequities at every level of our culture. It affects black americans in northern cities and white americans in southern towns. It cripples education, the courts and our jails.

    I am also sad to see so many comments posted that look for the ‘other’ – be it arab, black, white or gay – to blame.

    Sen. Obama should be commended for speaking so candidly on a very risky and politically incorrect subject. Would any of US in his position be so brave?

  43. Phantom
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 1:22 pm | Permalink

    After the dumbing down of America from listening to bushspeak, can the populace even understand adult level speeches?

  44. Steven Davis
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 1:23 pm | Permalink

    Phillip Brownlee,

    As I am listening to Obama’s speech, I, too, am having a difficult time understanding your description “grown up”. I know you guys don’t read these threads much, but I hope somehow that you are moved to explain that term.

    I would have used “courageous”, “honest” and frankly “skillful” in terms of turning around a criticism of him into statements about this candidate’s undeniable strengths.

  45. Posted March 18, 2008 at 1:23 pm | Permalink

    In case y’all missed it, this is what BO had to say about the ‘good’ rev.

    “I have already condemned, in unequivocal terms, the statements of Rev. Wright that have caused such controversy. “
    “But the remarks that have caused this recent firestorm weren’t simply controversial. They weren’t simply a religious leader’s effort to speak out against perceived injustice.
    “Instead, they expressed a profoundly distorted view of this country “
    “As such, Rev. Wright’s comments were not only wrong but divisive, divisive at a time when we need unity; racially charged at a time when we need to come together to solve a set of monumental problems”

  46. Phantom
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 1:23 pm | Permalink

    Especially since the Republicans liked to say “I voted for bush ’cause he’s just like ordinary folk’.

  47. lindainks55
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 1:25 pm | Permalink

    Phantom, Some folk are more discerning than others.

  48. Political_mama
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 1:26 pm | Permalink

    This was one of the most profound speeches i have ever heard. Yeah it would have been politically correct for Obama to ditch his reverend, but it is apparent to me that he’s not going to ditch someone so important to him for his own gain.

    That speaks VOLUMES to the ethics of Obama, he is one heck of a good man. I am thoroughly impressed.

    And he isn’t doing what republicans would do, defend, deflect and deny. He says I don’t agree, and I still love him, I see a bigger picture.

    It just figures there would be people who would take this speech and try to turn it nasty. sadly, they’re the very reasons why I cannot support Obama in the election because THESE are the kind of people who need to be defeated, not worked with.

  49. Posted March 18, 2008 at 1:29 pm | Permalink

    Phantom,

    Your PC back up?

  50. Hank Price
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 1:30 pm | Permalink

    BS Bruce!

    Poverty is not the cause of any social problems! Poverty in the U.S. is a temporary condition if you are not a ‘victim’ of a poverty culture.

    A culture of poverty that race baiters like the good Rev. Wright use to maintain their positions of power and prominance in the black community.

    No Bruce, Poverty isn’t the problem of our society, it’s a symptom of liberalism.

  51. TDT
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 1:30 pm | Permalink

    Ksgrm
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 12:08 pm | Permalink
    TDT
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 12:00 pm | Permalink
    Proudman – Your generalities show your ignorance. He did not sit in the pews listening to racist rhetoric for 20 years.

    By his own admission he has belonged to this church for 20 years. Where do you think he was sitting during these years?

    Ksgrm – He wasn’t listening to racist rhetoric for 20 years, he was listening to his pastors sermons about the bible and brotherly love. They have found one sermon in 20 years that is offensive when viewed out of context, and they are generalizing him because of that ONE sermon in TWENTY YEARS as a racist.

  52. Political_mama
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 1:31 pm | Permalink

    For all of you Republicans who think that Rev. Wright said something horrible and Michelle Obama was wrong for what she said…

    I really want you to try to explain these words:

    Why should God bless America?
    She’s forgotten he exists
    And has turned her back
    On everything that made her what she is

    Why should God stand beside her
    Through the night with the light from his hand?
    God have mercy on America
    Forgive her sin and heal our land

    The courts ruled prayer out of our schools
    In June of ‘62
    Told the children “you are your own God now
    So you can make the rules”
    O say can you see what that choice
    Has cost us to this day
    America, one nation under God, has gone astray

    Why should God bless America?
    Shes’s forgotten he exists
    And has turned her back on everything
    That made her what she is

    Why should God stand beside her
    Through the night with the light from his hand?
    God have mercy on America
    Forgive her sins and heal our land

    In ‘73 the Courts said we
    Could take the unborn lives
    The choice is yours don’t worry now
    It’s not a wrong, it’s your right

    But just because they made it law
    Does not change God’s command
    The most that we can hope for is
    God’s mercy on our land

    Why should God bless America?
    She’s forgotten he exists
    And has turned her back on everything
    That made her what she is

    Why should God stand beside her
    Through the night with the light from his hand?
    God have mercy on America
    Forgive her sins and heal our land

    (Reading from 2nd Chronicles 7:14) If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves and pray and seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, then will I hear from heaven and forgive their sin and heal their land

    God have mercy on America forgive her sins and heal our land

    This was sung before one of the GOP Presidential debates.

  53. J R
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 1:34 pm | Permalink

    “Poverty isn’t the problem of our society, it’s a symptom of liberalism.”

    Too bad we all can’t marry well.

  54. lindainks55
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 1:35 pm | Permalink

    Steven,

    On the question about calling Obama’s speech “grown up,” I have a thought. When I listen to bush speak I feel like I’ve been lectured. He frequently states something and then repeats it as if his audience might be too stupid to understand and he needs to clarify. How often do you hear him say, “in other words…?” Even his tone is condescending. Because to me bush seems like a terribly arrogant man I never think he might be aware of his inadequacies as a speaker. I come away with the feeling he thinks of himself as greatly superior.

    When Barack spoke today he treated us, his audience, with respect. It was as one adult would speak with another.

    Of course, my thoughts and Mr. Brownlee’s thoughts may be very different and I’m not speaking for anyone but me.

    Maybe Mr. Brownlee had a second to write an intro to a topic he thought we would want to discuss and he did a good job in a hurry but could have done a better one with more time.

    A couple of theories.

  55. Rage
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 1:36 pm | Permalink

    All in all, pretty well done. He made only two references that could be said to pander to conservatives (though he might well have been pandering to Bill Cosby, or Jesse Jackson, who have said similar things in much harsher terms). Even then, there were qualifying nuances—at least if one was interested in seeing them.

    Having seen the welfare system up close, I happen to agree that it helps perpetuate poverty, not by giving bums a free ride (thought that does happen), but rather by a maze of rules, requirements, and mandatory actions, designed supposedly to help these people, but in reality keep them busy with remaining within the system itself.

    Of couse if he wins the nomination the Wright issue will be used non-stop. No one wants to elect a scary black man . The question is: how will swing voters respond?

  56. Political_mama
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 1:36 pm | Permalink

    Hank, you’re full of shit. Poverty is the main cause of all the bad things that happen.

    Wars, suicides, Communism, Socialism, Marxism, Fascism, starvation, depression, all of them are impacted by poverty.

    You see it in every single statistic, crime rates go up when poverty rates increase. And it gets worse when the haves turn around and blame it on those who have not. Eventually the have nots get tired of being told how they haven’t done enough to get ahead. And they decide to ‘do’ something about it by getting rid of the ‘haves’.

  57. Posted March 18, 2008 at 1:38 pm | Permalink

    “Steven Davis” –

    Before this thread started, I commented on the Open Thread how refreshing to hear a major political figure talking to the American people like we are grown-ups; with respect, without jingoistic slogans (”Bring ‘em on!” Remember?) In complete sentences and with insight and clarity of thought.

    After two terms of smirking and posturing by George WMD Bush, Obama shows maturity, judgement, wisdom, and substance.

  58. littlejohn
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 1:41 pm | Permalink

    Political_mama
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 1:36 pm | Permalink
    Hank, you’re full of shit. Poverty is the main cause of all the bad things that happen.

    ——–

    Political Mama–

    You are just wrong. I have known far too many poor people that would not think of taking what is not theirs. You diss them by lumping them in with the useless pos that feel otherwise. Criminal activity for the most part is not caused by being financially poor, but instead by beig morally bancrupt.

  59. Steven Davis
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 1:41 pm | Permalink

    Political Mom,

    You obviously heard the same speech I did. We may have just witnessed Obama’s turning the corner into the home stretch of this nomination.

    Thanks, Linda.

  60. J R
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 1:43 pm | Permalink

    Well of course my electoral preference is known.

    That said? His pretty words didn’t impress me anymore than they ever do. Just more of the same.

  61. Steven Davis
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 1:46 pm | Permalink

    Okay, MonkeyHawk. But, I think that your comment lends credence to Bill Maher’s comment that Bush has engendered “f**k-up fatigue”. Shouldn’t we assume that our presidents are going to sound “grown up”? And this is not an especially worthy attribute?

  62. TDT
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 1:47 pm | Permalink

    It was impressive. I was worried, and thought, uh-oh, here comes his downfall. And then he stood up, wrote an incredible and thoughtful speech, and stood before the nation and spoke to us about that which most politicians won’t touch with a ten foot pole. Good for him!!It was the best thing he could have done in this situation.

  63. Political_mama
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 1:49 pm | Permalink

    Sure LJ, and all those ‘illegal aliens’ that everyone hates so much, they’re just breaking the law because they feel like it right?

    I mean you and I, we’d travel across wide expanses of deserts and risk jail to live in Mexico, right?

  64. Steven Davis
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 1:50 pm | Permalink

    Hank,

    Thanks for sharing your valuable insights about this Democratic candidate.

    Care to share your wise thoughts on your party’s candidate.

    Anyone else notice how the right wing folk are strangely silent on their candidate? Wonder what that means?…

  65. Hud
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 1:53 pm | Permalink

    Well Steven I give up could it something to do with the topic of the blog? “Obama speech bold, moving, grown-up”

  66. Nathan
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 1:55 pm | Permalink

    Steven,

    When the thread is about McCain, then we will talk about McCain.

    There is nothing “strange” about our talking about the subject matter which is posted by the Ediotrs.

  67. Phantom
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 1:55 pm | Permalink

    Sol, not yet but they’re sending out disks, only cost 15 dol. so not too bad.

  68. Boxlock
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 1:56 pm | Permalink

    CapnAmerica
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 12:17 pm |

    “The systematic discrimination we’ve shown to the African-American over the centuries cannot be denied. The petty tokenism (like affirmative-action) that we propose as a way of recompense is far too little, too late.
    Far easier just to blame the victims for their lack of “individual responsibility.”

    What a crock of B.S., which is typical considering the source.
    I have not, and nobody I know, has systematically discriminated against anyone, black or any other color. I don’t have either the time or position to have an effect on anyone else anyway.
    I work to provide for my family, improve our lot in life, provide for the future, and get along the best I can. And yes, it most certainly is the level of individual responsibility that always determines ones success or lack thereof in the vast majority of cases.
    Capn, you are their worst enemy, by attempting to keep them down on the ‘entitlement plantation’ with your propagation of the lie that it’s always someone else’s fault besides the individual.
    Wise up.

  69. Phantom
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 1:56 pm | Permalink

    They’re sending xpsp2, is that the same as xp?

  70. Steven Davis
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 1:57 pm | Permalink

    “Having seen the welfare system up close, I happen to agree that it helps perpetuate poverty, not by giving bums a free ride (thought that does happen), but rather by a maze of rules, requirements, and mandatory actions, designed supposedly to help these people, but in reality keep them busy with remaining within the system itself.”

    Excellent point, Rage. Welfare, I think, from a similar close view, always takes more from people than it ever gives them. Conservatives don’t ever seem to get that. If they did, they might be able to make some intelligent comments on the subject.

  71. Rage
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 1:59 pm | Permalink

    They’re sending xpsp2, is that the same as xp?

    Yep.

    Hey, I just in the neighborbood, Sol.

  72. Steven Davis
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 2:00 pm | Permalink

    Sorry, Nathan, I guess I have just missed you guys’ irrational exuberance over your candidate. :)

  73. Steven Davis
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 2:02 pm | Permalink

    Hud,
    ditto above to you, as well.

  74. cosmos
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 2:04 pm | Permalink

    Hank Price posted March 18, 2008 at 1:30 pm

    Poverty isn’t the problem of our society, it’s a symptom of liberalism.

    What percentage of your wealth does your wife provide? And since you served in the Navy, are you getting any taxpayer-funded benefits?

  75. Posted March 18, 2008 at 2:05 pm | Permalink

    Phantom,

    XPSP2 is XP with service pack 2 installed. Took care of most of the bugs. So it is actually better than XP. Be on the lookout for SP3. M$ has found some memory caveats that will drastically increase performance.

    Betting Vista sales take a nose dive.

  76. Posted March 18, 2008 at 2:05 pm | Permalink

    Lots of good stuff posted above. LH, Bruce, Siam thanks for your fresh perspectives.

    J R, Steven, LindainKs, MH, Phant, Rage, TDT and P-Mom are interesting as always.

    As for Nathan’s question:

    “So what about a student who scores higher on tests and is more qualified on an acceptance into a school and is then turned down for a less qualified person simply because that person is black?”

    Race is a factor as well as test scores for college admission. So is age, past experience, the admission essay, volunteer work, economic status, extra-curricular activities and geographic location.

    George Bush got accepted to Andover Prep School partly because he was from Texas and the admission office seeks diversity.

    That’s hardly the same thing as getting routinely shaken down by cops for DWB, “driving while black.”

  77. Boxlock
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 2:07 pm | Permalink

    Personally, I am fed up with people seemingly trying to tell me it’s my fault, through discrimination, that someone else hasn’t achieved what others have. I don’t have anything to do with it or them and their lot in life. It’s hard enough for me to keep up myself.

    What would you suggest Capn, something like this;
    “In response to a number of complaints that there is discrimination taking place with not enough Black and Hispanic people appearing on TV, the Network has decided that in the future ‘America’s Most Wanted’ will be shown ‘TWICE’ weekly.”
    It’s hard to achieve much sitting in jail you know.

  78. littlejohn
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 2:07 pm | Permalink

    Political_mama
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 1:49 pm | Permalink
    Sure LJ, and all those ‘illegal aliens’ that everyone hates so much, they’re just breaking the law because they feel like it right?

    I mean you and I, we’d travel across wide expanses of deserts and risk jail to live in Mexico, right?

    If you want to talk about illegal aliens, I’d be happy to oblige. Your post was about how poverty causes crime. Different subject. However, I am glad to note that you think being an illegal alien is a crime. Thanks!

  79. Posted March 18, 2008 at 2:08 pm | Permalink

    “Steven Davis” asks –

    “Shouldn’t we assume that our presidents are going to sound ‘grown up?’”

    Well, yeah. Despite the lack thereof for the past two terms.

  80. Steven Davis
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 2:14 pm | Permalink

    To empirically examine Nathan’s claim that conservative posters talk about McCain on “McCain threads”, check out the number of “CONLove” posts for McCain on this thread. I think I found zero.

    http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/03/advising-mccain-lobbying-for-eads/#comments

  81. Posted March 18, 2008 at 2:14 pm | Permalink

    Boxlock writes–

    “I have not, and nobody I know, has systematically discriminated against anyone, black or any other color. I don’t have either the time or position to have an effect on anyone else anyway.”

    Nevertheless, you have benefitted by not being discriminated against.

    As for “not knowing” anyone who has systematically discriminated against anyone, that is false. You know landlords, don’t you? They discriminate against people of color all the time. I’ve seen it happen.

    A very high percent of predatory loans were written to people of color, so much so that NCAA is now filing suit. Maybe the bankers that you know weren’t directly involved, but many bankers were.

    And how about those white RepubliCON Kansas legislators who allow “loans” of 100 percent interest APR by legalizing “pay day lenders,” knowing that this usuary will hurt the poor and minorities?

    Nah, nothing to see here.

  82. Posted March 18, 2008 at 2:19 pm | Permalink

    While Barack Obama was speaking in Pennsylvania this morning, the Republic Party candidate John WMD McCain forget who the enemy is in Iraq.

    Today he told reporters that Iran was training al Qaeda fighters and sending them into Iraq. This is hilarious because of course Iran is Shiite and al Qaeda is Sunni, so they hate each other.

    Pressed to elaborate, McCain said it was “common knowledge and has been reported in the media that al-Qaeda is going back into Iran and receiving training and are coming back into Iraq from Iran, that’s well known. And it’s unfortunate.”

    Vinegar Joe Lieberman quickly intervened, suggesting that Iran is training Shiite extremists and sending them into Iraq.

    So there you have it, old foreign policy wonk and most-credible-war-on-terror-guy McCain can’t remember which religious sect aligns with which ancient hatred, because he is senile.

  83. Hank Price
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 2:19 pm | Permalink

    Hey Steven,

    Be glad to share my wisdom about McCain! He wasn’t my choice, but, He’s my man now!

    The democrats give me absolutly no choice. McCain has supported and co-authored legislation that absolutely makes my blood boil! Hell, Bush (again, not my choice) signed a lot of it into law!

    McCain has always been a physcal conservative. He’s never voted for a tax increase. He voted against the Bush tax cuts because he wanted spending cuts too.

    He is absolutely correct and resolute on the war on terror. Hillary or Obama would be a disaster if elected.

    Now, normally I don’t see the need nor have the desire to defend McCain on a thread that the dems are fighting amonst themselves on, but thanks for asking!

  84. Posted March 18, 2008 at 2:23 pm | Permalink

    What would you suggest Capn?

    Why, thank you for asking, Boxlock.

    What I would suggest is

    1. voting for legislators who will take a harder stand against discrimination against poor and minorities. Racism should carry a jail term the same as pushing drugs and terrorism, for it IS a kind of terrorism.

    2. getting gov’t to help people who need help instead of helping people who are already rich.

    3. reversing the policies that gutted the only counter-weight to the rich-getting-richer in this country, labor unions.

    4. spending as much on education as we do on our military. Right now, we spend eight times more on the military.

    5. repeal NAFTA and all the other so-called “free trade” treaties that are bleeding good jobs out of the US and require “fair trade” agreements, so that our workers aren’t competing against de facto slave labor in Occupied Guam.

    6. pass a “living wage” law so that a full-time working Mom for instance can make enough to live on.

    That would be a hellova good start.

  85. Hank Price
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 2:26 pm | Permalink

    #
    cosmos
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 2:04 pm | Permalink

    Hank Price posted March 18, 2008 at 1:30 pm

    “Poverty isn’t the problem of our society, it’s a symptom of liberalism.”

    What percentage of your wealth does your wife provide? And since you served in the Navy, are you getting any taxpayer-funded benefits?

    Interesting little diversion, cosmos! What do you consider wealthy? Why do you think I am?

    I’m retired Navy. As such I recieve all the benefits that I have earned!

  86. Ed Friedemann
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 2:27 pm | Permalink

    Wright’s tirade was nothing more than venting pent-up anger. Anger accumulated over many years of the reality of being treated because you’re black in America. And where does that fault belong?

    Certainly not with Obama.

  87. Posted March 18, 2008 at 2:30 pm | Permalink

    “I’m retired Navy. As such I recieve all the benefits that I have earned!”

    Which is another way of saying “welfare paid by tax-payers, most of whom make a lot less than my family does.”

    But don’t feel like you owe anything back, Hank, after all, you “earned” it . . .

  88. Posted March 18, 2008 at 2:31 pm | Permalink

    Wow, MAX!

    When Rev. Wright runs for President, I won’t vote for him!

  89. littlejohn
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 2:34 pm | Permalink

    I’m retired Navy. As such I recieve all the benefits that I have earned!”

    Which is another way of saying “welfare paid by tax-payers, most of whom make a lot less than my family does.”

    But don’t feel like you owe anything back, Hank, after all, you “earned” it . . .

    ——-

    Matter of fact, he did earn it. And while I have no idea how much Hank makes, most US taxpayers do okay. Notice I did not say wagearners, I said taxpayers.

  90. Nathan
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 2:35 pm | Permalink

    CapnAmerica,

    My father WORKED for 20 years in the Navy to EARN his retirement.

    That is not Welfare.

  91. Hank Price
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 2:36 pm | Permalink

    We probably ought to do lunch, Capn. if you think that Navy retirement benefits are the same as welfare! They aren’t quite as good as most of the KPERs retiree benefits or the average fireman or policeman, but I’m not complaining.

  92. Hud
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 2:38 pm | Permalink

    “They aren’t quite as good as most of the KPERs retiree benefits or the average fireman or policeman, but I’m not complaining.”

    I will second that.

  93. Nathan
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 2:40 pm | Permalink

    CapnAmerica tried to pass himself off the other day as supporting the troops, but his anti-military crap is coming through once more today.

  94. parkay
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 2:45 pm | Permalink

    Why don’t I believe anything Obamanation says?
    Planned Parenthood is doing unto nearly half of his tiny dark-skinned brothers and sisters the mangling, dismembering, poisoning, and beheading which pleases him no end, especially when he gets the blood-stained “contributions” from the abortion mills raking in the huge profits.
    Obamanation is the Judas goat of the black race.

  95. Hank Price
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 2:47 pm | Permalink

    Actually Boy, it was 21 years.

  96. cosmos
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 2:48 pm | Permalink

    Dear Hank Price,

    It wasn’t a “diversion”.

    You said that poverty is a “symptom of liberalism”.

    But your money seems to come from tax-payers, and your wife.

  97. Nathan
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 2:51 pm | Permalink

    Cosmos,

    What part of working for 20 years to EARN a retirement don’t you understand?

  98. Hank Price
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 2:59 pm | Permalink

    Dear cosmos,

    “But your money seems to come from tax-payers, and your wife.”

    Care to explain your mischaracterization of my financial status?

    I explained in detail last month of how I got to where I am financialy. It was do to very hard work on my wife’s part and on my part. We still work at the clinic about 50 hours a week and take work home.

    What do you do for a living, cosmos?

  99. Hank Price
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 3:00 pm | Permalink

    do=due

  100. outlander
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 3:02 pm | Permalink

    “A very high percent of predatory loans were written to people of color, so much so that NCAA is now filing suit.”

    —————

    Chuckle, the NCAA is filing suit? Got a little March Madness on the brain, Capn? Me too.

    If low income people aren’t getting loans, it’s redlining. If they are, it’s predatory lending.

    I am noticing more and more that liberals just look for something to bitch about. Hell, they even begrudge our military their pensions!

  101. Political_mama
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 3:05 pm | Permalink

    I love how you TOTALLY ignored the point LJ. POVERTY is why they leave Mexico to come here. Not because they’re looking to be criminals.

  102. Steven Davis
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 3:07 pm | Permalink

    “Now, normally I don’t see the need nor have the desire to defend McCain on a thread that the dems are fighting amonst themselves on, but thanks for asking!”

    Sorry Hank,

    Your crew has been deafeningly silent on the candidacy of McCain. According to Nathan and Hud, your team is just following the rules. :) – That was a good one.

    On this particular McCain thread:

    http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/03/mccain-the-biggest-winner-tuesday/#comments

    there were a couple of Con-posters defending McCain, but not I would categorize as supporting him – a BIG difference don’t you think Hank.

    Heck, Hank, you can’t blame me if I am thrilled that you guys are stuck with someone you can’t stomach, much less support.

    Noticed yesterday, the Washington Post was saying that due to the protracted dog fight in the Dem party, that in the polls McCain is gaining on, and in some cases winning over both Obama and Clinton. So, you may be correct, we Dems may yet snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. And if we let that happen, we do deserve what we get: John Sidney McSame, the Third (Bush administration).

  103. J R
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 3:11 pm | Permalink

    Well talk radio is not letting this go.

    They are riding it hard. And more quotes from this pastor are being found.

  104. littlejohn
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 3:12 pm | Permalink

    Wether or not they are looking to be criminals, I am glad to see that you agree that they are.
    Look, poverty in the United States is not the same as poverty anywhere else. In fact, poverty in the United States is better than 90% of the country in many countries. Your point was theat poverty creates crime. In the United States. My point is that it has less to do with financial povery, and more to do with moral povery. Remember the mantra you profess “Your rights end where mine begin”. Fine, your right to take what is mine, does not exist. No matte your financial condition. Poverty is no excuse for criminal behavior. Period. You want to forgive it fine. I don’t. I have known far too many poor people who wouild not even THINK of committing a crime to change their condition. Of course, they had morals. They had character. They had something more. The criminal element has none.

  105. Steven Davis
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 3:13 pm | Permalink

    “McCain has always been a physcal conservative.”

    Does that mean he was consistently lazy?

    Sorry, that one was too good to pass up. :)

  106. cosmos
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 3:13 pm | Permalink

    Nathan,

    What part of being paid by tax-payers for 21 years in the Navy do you not understand?

    Dear Hank,

    I’m glad that you help your wife at the clinic.

  107. littlejohn
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 3:16 pm | Permalink

    cosmos
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 3:13 pm | Permalink
    Nathan,

    What part of being paid by tax-payers for 21 years in the Navy do you not understand?

    Would you please clarify that statement? Are you equating 21 years in the military to being on welfare?

  108. Political_mama
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 3:16 pm | Permalink

    “We probably ought to do lunch, Capn. if you think that Navy retirement benefits are the same as welfare! They aren’t quite as good as most of the KPERs retiree benefits or the average fireman or policeman, but I’m not complaining.”

    MY Husband gets KPERS, and it aint much. Of course, he makes crap, and with the proposal a mere 30cent raise woo hoo.

    Corrections officers should be making as much as State troopers. Why aren’t they?

  109. littlejohn
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 3:19 pm | Permalink

    “Corrections officers should be making as much as State troopers. Why aren’t they?”

    Because correciton officer jobs are easier to fill.
    Not necessarily rightly or wrongly, but the way it is. The labor market is about supply and demand. The state government is just another employer. One that, I might add, underpays it’s employees. However, as long as they can get people for the pay, they will not have to raise the pay. Simple.

  110. Nathan
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 3:19 pm | Permalink

    Political Mama,

    Probably the same reason that a State Trooper is not making as much as the Governor does.

  111. cosmos
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 3:20 pm | Permalink

    outlander,

    I do not “begrudge our military their pensions”. I’m simply pointing out the source of their income.

  112. Mod
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 3:20 pm | Permalink

    “talk about Jesus”? A Republican? Whenever I’ve seen anyone try to talk about Jesus, Republicans and members of the “right” reply with a raft of quotes from the OLD testament and some mumbling about how Jesus was sent to shore up “old testament law” – that, essentially, the Gospel is irrelevant to the point of being heretical. That’s hardly the basis for the “right” claiming the scriptural high road.

  113. Political_mama
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 3:20 pm | Permalink

    people who were in the military deserve their perks. But there are a whole ton of people who didn’t go to military, or served less than a career, who do NOT get those perks.

    What makes you think you are more deserving of retirement than someone else? Why am I, who takes care of elderly, have been a 12 year veteran of a volunteer ambulance corps, why is MY job considered less valuable than your contribution to society Hank?

  114. Political_mama
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 3:22 pm | Permalink

    Nathan that’s gotta be the DUMBEST comparison I’ve heard all day.

    A state trooper and a corrections officer have comparable jobs. A governor and a state trooper do not.

  115. TDT
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 3:22 pm | Permalink

    Max
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 2:29 pm | Permalink
    Raw Data: Controversial Statements by Rev. Wright
    by FOXNews.com
    Tuesday, March 18, 2008

    What’s wild is most of his statements I agree with.

  116. Nathan
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 3:23 pm | Permalink

    Political Mama,

    How many hours a week do you work in the “volunteer ambulance corps?”

    On top of that, isn’t it the VOLUNTEER ambulance corps?

  117. Nathan
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 3:25 pm | Permalink

    Political Mama,

    The comparison was not between the job, but the reason.

    State Troopers are exepected to be of a much higher caliber than a corrections officer.

    It is a much more competitive field of employment to get into. They only accept the most highly qualified candidates.

    Thus they are rewarded with higher pay.

  118. Phantom
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 3:28 pm | Permalink

    Maybe that’s why my program messed up, don’t think I ever installed the sp2.

  119. Steven Davis
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 3:32 pm | Permalink

    “And how about those white RepubliCON Kansas legislators who allow “loans” of 100 percent interest APR by legalizing “pay day lenders,” knowing that this usuary will hurt the poor and minorities?”

    Actually, Capn, in Kansas the APR charged by payday loan shops is approximately 380% In Dick Cheney’s home state of Wyoming, the APR charged there is over 700%. So, many of those KS RepuliCON legislators might argue we are actually being pretty kind to our poor borrowers.

    There are at least two Wichita credit unions who are offering small loan products to poorer borrowers which have short term interest rates at 36%. A much better deal.

  120. littlejohn
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 3:33 pm | Permalink

    Political Mama-

    I don;t fault your service at all. You know better than that. However, you have said before that you are self employed. As such, you are responsible for your own retirement, other than social security. And while your volunteer service is commendable, and in fact indispensable, it was volunteer, and held no promise of compensation, or retirement. ALso, if someone served “less than a career” how are they entitled to a retirement? In fact, by federal law, if you participate in a pension program, afte 5 years you are vestd in that program. 100% of whatever pension earnings you have earned up to that point.
    In point of fact, Hank did finish a career. That career being established by statute at 20 years, and was entitled to retirement benefits. In addition, the pay for most of that 20 years, if enlisted, was/is quite a bit less than what can be earned doing the same thing (if possible) in the civilian world.

  121. Political_mama
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 3:38 pm | Permalink

    On call at least 24 hours a week. And that’s only because I won’t do more. Nothing better than never being able to leave town, take a shower, sleep unclothed…we give up family dinners holidays, etc.
    It’s not just a job, it’s a lifestyle.

    You don’t think that Correction officers need also be of high caliber? Or did you forget about the correction officers that aided the escape out of ElDorado? They have to be able to shoot, they have to be trusted to interact with not one or two criminals per day, but hundreds, without hardly anyone else around. They have to be trusted to not bring contraband into the facility. I’m insulted that you think a corrections officer doesn’t work at least as equally, if not MORE than a Trooper.

  122. Political_mama
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 3:41 pm | Permalink

    Dear LJ, I began a part-time business with my husband. It is NOT self employment. And since the economy has been slowing so has business.

    we both maintain other jobs. No I dont fault my service. I fault my city for not making it more important.

    My husband spent 10 years in the military. He didn’t get much. Obviously he shouldn’t get as much as Hank, but come on, it was worth more than nothing.

  123. Political_mama
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 3:44 pm | Permalink

    besides, my comment to Hank had really nothing to do with how much one makes, but the value of work and pride, why does HE think his contribution was worth so much more than mine, or my husbands to society that he deserves to live better than me?

  124. Ksgrm
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 3:45 pm | Permalink

    Cosmos you are one messed up person. You rant at Hank for receiving a retirement he earned. We don’t know what you receive because you have never shared anything but the fact that you drink the GW koolaid. You and every other man and woman in the USofA had the right to join the military. Put in their years and receive the same retirement benefit Hank has earned. This is a choice. People have to make choices in life.

    You choose to believe GW is happening others don’t. To belittle a person for being retired military is low and little.

    This thread is about Obama. By his own admission he had a minister who was devisive, racist, etc… Many many times he did this. Unless he was a quick change artist by his clothing alone this happened many Sundays. Poor judgement on Obama’s part. The speech this morning was a desperate attempt to change the subject.

    Didn’t work.

  125. J R
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 3:48 pm | Permalink

    Huh

    Only person I see ranting here grm is you.

  126. Political_mama
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 3:49 pm | Permalink

    You are very very sad Ksgrm. Must be hard being so morally superior and all.

  127. Ksgrm
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 3:55 pm | Permalink

    PMom and JR I guess it would be better if I moan and groan about my lot inlife and turn an Obama thread into a poor me thread.

    Get a grip. We all make choices and live with the results of those choices. Noone owes me anything. I work to earn what I get and you know I worked more hours per week than Bill Gates but I sure did ‘t get his salary.

    I guess I should complain to the ‘Life ain’t fair Committee’.

  128. Door King
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 3:59 pm | Permalink

    P.M.– “That speaks VOLUMES to the ethics of Obama, he is one heck of a good man. I am thoroughly impressed.”

    Does this mean you’re going to watch Keith again?

  129. Political_mama
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 3:59 pm | Permalink

    See that’s exactly it Grm, you all complain that its everyone else’s fault for being poor, that they’re lazy, worthless saps on society.

    The truth is much harder to stomach. So you make believe that you work harder and deserve it more than anyone else.

    So much easier than to see the truth.

  130. Political_mama
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 4:00 pm | Permalink

    no perv I’m not. I’m still mad at Keith.

  131. Max
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 4:04 pm | Permalink

    Nice pretty speech by Obama. It will fool many.

    ANGER.

    Obama used the word ANGER 10 TIMES in this speech!

    Now we know the side of Obama he hasn’t shown before. The ANGRY Black Man side. The side that makes him go to a Radical Black Angry Church for 20 years!

    That ANGER that Obama claims in this speech is so unproductive, is EXACTLY what he has been using to energize his base. That ANGER benevolently disguised as HOPE and CHANGE is the fuel he will use to BUY his votes by making promises to give away HOPE and CHANGE in the form of Government Programs.

    That ANGER at the RICH and BIG EVIL CORPORATIONS will continue to be used to convince voters that change can occur if we simply demonize the rich and give to the poor. Yes, that ANGER that Obama complains about, is exactly what he has used and is using more then ever today to energize his base.

    The Radical Libs on this blog for example, that live to HATE, will fall hook, line, and sinker for promises of prosperity by taxing the rich.

    What Obama fails to mention in this speech, is how HE and Clinton both defined Rich last week in their vote to raise taxes on the rich. The rich according to what Obama DID last week (as opposed to what he says today) are single people earning $31,000 or more and married people earning $61,000 or more.

    What Obama fails to mention is the Rich he is going to raise taxes on is the Majority of America!

    Raising taxes on the Rich to give more to the Poor, THAT will really Unite America! That will empower the Poor, not by giving them an opportunity to earn more, but by Giving Them More For Doing Nothing!

    And those Evil Corporations, when they are taxed to death they will close their doors or move move overseas eliminating even more jobs. THAT will really Unite America!

    Nice pretty speech Obama. But the devil is in the details of his plan. And the devil is in his disguised use of ANGER tactics, the very same tactics he complained about today.

    THAT will Unite America!

  132. Boxlock
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 4:04 pm | Permalink

    CapnAmerica Posted March 18, 2008 at 2:14 pm |
    “Nevertheless, you have benefitted by not being discriminated against.”

    And I am to assume some level of fault or guilt for that, even if it were true…what a ridiculous argument. Would you feel better if I went out looking for someone to discriminate against me? Would that improve anyone else’s lot in life? I don’t feel guilty about not having cancer or being struck by lighting when I see someone else has either. I may well have compassion but I didn’t cause it and your suggested remedies are what cause or increase the problem.
    Do you ever reread what you write before you post?

    “As for “not knowing” anyone who has systematically discriminated against anyone, that is false. You know landlords, don’t you?”

    No, I’ve owned my own home for 30 years, and who are you to be telling me what I know or don’t.

    “A very high percent of predatory loans were written to people of color, so much so that NCAA is now filing suit. Maybe the bankers that you know weren’t directly involved, but many bankers were.”

    By the way show me where the “NCAA” is filing a lawsuit over high interest loans. I think you’ve got your N’s, C’s and A’s fouled up.
    I’m not close to the banking industry, unfortunately, but I can sure has heck tell you I would be covering my risks with the interest rates I charged. And that’s not illegal or immoral discrimination. That’s just smart, justified business discrimination based on risk level and would apply to any race or color.

    “And how about those white RepubliCON Kansas legislators who allow “loans” of 100 percent interest APR by legalizing “pay day lenders,” knowing that this usuary will hurt the poor and minorities?”
    As far as I can tell that is pretty universal in all states, Red or Blue, it’s not a political thing. What do you suggest, cutting high risk borrowers off to all loans?
    Besides, “pay day lenders” don’t discriminate on the basis of race, or with the poor and minorities. They’ll do business taking advantage of anybody, with anyone stupid enough to go there. They’d love for Warren Buffett to stroll in and finance his next acquisition.
    Gee Capn, I see where you got your ‘nic’, you are most definitely the ‘Captain’ of victimhood.

  133. Regular
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 4:09 pm | Permalink

    I see the Obama Pajama party members are out in force!

    CHANGE…

    (chortles)

  134. Ksgrm
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 4:13 pm | Permalink

    Pmom I don’t think I am superior over anyone. You have absolutely nothing to base that statement on. I have helped many people better themselves. I continue to do so.

    What I was referring to was the fact that JR by his own admission refuses to work for the ‘man’ even if he could make more money. I tried to help you get more education so you could make more money. You berated me for the effort. I wish you and your husband were in a position to gain additional skills which would enable you both to make more money.

    That is the answer to your situation. I’m not superior to anyone.

  135. Political_mama
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 4:13 pm | Permalink

    THE POOR do not want handouts. They want to work a decent job for a decent wage. They want to be able to go to work, to pay their most basic bills without having to worry about who they have to hold off on payment in order to eat.

    Years ago, a person could make a decent living on one income. It wasn’t a lot, but the wage gap has increased immensely. The bosses have gotten far richer, and the workers far poorer.

    Something is gonna give here really soon.

  136. Rage
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 4:15 pm | Permalink

    XPSP2 is XP with service pack 2 installed. Took care of most of the bugs. So it is actually better than XP

    So Phantom had SP1? Ouch.

    Vista is already taking a nosedive, of course–and well-deserved. :) Ick.

  137. Ksgrm
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 4:17 pm | Permalink

    Pmom I genuinely don’t know what you mean by your last statement.

    “Something is gonna give here really soon.”

    What do you think is going to happen. What do you expect to happen when Hillary or Obama is prez?

  138. Regular
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 4:19 pm | Permalink

    It will be awhile before the transition to Vista takes over. Vista Ultimate can utilize 8gb of memory right out of the box and of course is 64bit. Once the faster multicores come out later in the year, everyone that does gaming, video or heavy graphic intensive applications will boost the sales. The new processors are on the order of several times faster than the top of the line Xeon processors.

    That will require the sophistication of Vista to run.

    Other than that, if you just blog, email and do light stuff – Windows XP will serve you for quite awhile. :)

  139. cosmos
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 4:21 pm | Permalink

    ksgrm,

    I’m sorry that you cannot recognize the obvious.

    Hank Price posted March 18, 2008 at 1:30 pm

    Poverty isn’t the problem of our society, it’s a symptom of liberalism.

    “Liberals” pay taxes.

    Hank Price’s 21 year career in the Navy was funded by taxes. His retirement benefits are funded by taxes.

    Hank Price’s career and benefits were, and are partly paid for by “liberals”.

  140. Regular
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 4:25 pm | Permalink

    Of course, you know people like cosmos would never live a tube under hundreds of feet of water for weeks at time like Hank did.

    cosmos just likes to whine about people who sacrificed much by serving in the military.

    Sometimes, I’d like to round the radical left in a central area and give them a special delivery from a b-2 bomber, just to show them that we retired military still care about them. :D

  141. Rage
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 4:28 pm | Permalink

    That will require the sophistication of Vista to run.

    And, presumably, actually support drivers for third-party vendors. :) I’ll be overjoyed when Vista finally isn’t a total clusterf*ck, but I suspect Ballmer & Co. might just be better off moving on to Windows 7.

    Just My Opinion®.

  142. Ksgrm
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 4:37 pm | Permalink

    Cosmos if you really can’t grasp the reality of what the military has done and continues to do for you then there nothing more I can say to you. It is just so ironic that the liberal side of this blog think it is perfectly acceptable to reward many people with welfare even though they won’t work while very able to do so and yet they refer to earned military benefits as welfare.

  143. Max
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 4:39 pm | Permalink

    CapnAmerica
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 2:14 pm | Permalink

    A very high percent of predatory loans were written to people of color, so much so that NCAA is now filing suit. Maybe the bankers that you know weren’t directly involved, but many bankers were.
    ————————————————–

    NCAA? I would think they’d be pretty busy with the Final Four, but maybe they have a new mission now?

  144. Posted March 18, 2008 at 4:42 pm | Permalink

    P-Mom makes a valid point.

    Why do gov’t employees earn their retirement pensions, but nobody else does?

    Is a teacher more valued than an LPN doing home-care? Is a fireman more important to society than a computer programmer? A jarhead than a prison pastor?

    The simple fact is that the gov’t workers figured out a way to get the system to work for them, and that’s one reason that so many gov’t workers are unionized.

    Meanwhile, the some of the same people that benefit (Hank, Boxlock, Regular) from living on the taxpayer’s dime b!tch and moan about taxes being too high and the damn welfare queens.

    Figures.

  145. Ben
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 4:43 pm | Permalink

    I don’t know Max – after Georgia crashed their party I suspect the NCAA is still reeling.

    :)

  146. Posted March 18, 2008 at 4:45 pm | Permalink

    Thanks for providing the accurate figures on the “payday loan” legal scams.

    Charging interest like that would make the Gotti crime family blush for shame.

  147. Posted March 18, 2008 at 4:46 pm | Permalink

    Max, BoxofRocks, et al.

    Obviously I meant NAACP.

    Sheesh, get a life . . .

  148. Bentley
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 4:47 pm | Permalink

    JR mentioned in a 3:11 post that talk radio is not letting this go. It’s not at all clear why this would be surprising or relevant, especially if the reference is to Limbaugh or Hannity. These commentators will be switching back and forth between Obama and Clinton from now until the nomination is secured with any witch’s brew they can find. Right now, Obama has the lead in pledged delegates, so the focus has mostly been on Obama. If Clinton manages to forge ahead or gets the nomination via superdelegates, then Limbaugh and Hannity will be endlessly focusing on Clinton. Furthermore, Obama’s shot at attracting Limbaugh and Hannity listeners is probably pretty low. While he’s drawn some Republicans in the primaries, it’s a safe bet they were not devotees of conservative talk radio. Obama and Clinton will be looking to draw those in the moderate middle and those who trend toward the left. McCain will be looking to draw the same bunch in the moderate middle and those who trend toward the right. Finally, if Obama and Clinton somehow require approval from Hannity and Limbaugh if they want to get elected in November, then Brownlee can stop the presses here at We Blog straight away, because it’s never going to happen.

  149. J R
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 4:48 pm | Permalink

    cosmos’s point is sound ksgrm.

    And you have very little in the way of understanding as to welfare. Unless you are a single mom, it is damned hard to get any welfare.

    And no, I haven’t tried. There are people more needing of it than me. But this idea that there are is any kind of population paid not to work is about 20 years out of date.

  150. cosmos
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 4:48 pm | Permalink

    ksgrm,

    You seem to have a severe reading problem.

    I did not criticize the “military”. I pointed out that Hank’s career was partly paid for by “liberals”, who he ironically blames for causing “poverty”.

  151. J R
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 4:53 pm | Permalink

    My point “Bentley” is that talk radio started this ball rolling and they are not about to let it stop.

    I don’t pretend for a minute that that audience would ever vote for a Democrat.

    But as long as they are keeping the sound bites alive and digging up more, this story will be on all the media.

    This after talk radio AND the the media have given Obama a total pass these last several months.

    I don’t think Obama recovers from this.

  152. NN
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 4:54 pm | Permalink

    Be careful about repealing NAFTA. 38 States have Canada as the biggest customer of which 36 have seen exports to them increase since NAFTA. Our labour standards are as high with a bigger minimum wage, similar union wages, health care and similar enviornmental policies. Obama and Clinton in their speeches in Ohio about NAFTA did not mention Ohio has a trade SURPLUS with Canada, exporting $6.2 billion in machined/manufactured goods and taking in $4.2, almost all in energy. Net out the rise in energy costs and we have a near balanced or slight trade deficit with America. The US has the same right to our energy as we do under NAFTA for if there is a shorage we cannot keep supplies at home and must share production, whereas Mexico doesn’t. The energy policy was based on the sound idea that the US produces things we need so withholding energy from our source of everday needs is stupid. You can imagine how we would re-negotiate that part now. I have many friends who hate NAFTA and want to get rid of it because like you, only a few, mostly multinationals, benefitted from that treaty. Local joke for the acronym NAFTA Not Another F…..g Trade Agreement!

  153. Posted March 18, 2008 at 4:58 pm | Permalink

    Yup, I was thinking the same thing, Bentley.

    There’s a hard-core 20 million angry white men who haven’t succeeded to the extent that they feel they should have, so they need scape-goats like minorities and feminists and gays and liberals to blame.

    (In Germany in the 30’s, it was the Jew, but given that Jews and AIPAC are so ingrained in the Neo-Con movement–Irving Kristal and son William, Norman Poedortz, Douglas Feith, Paul Wolfowitz, Henry Kissinger, Richard Perleman, that doesn’t work here.)

    These 20 million p!ssed off whiteys that listen to hate-radio and watch Faux News aren’t voting for Obama anyway.

  154. Ksgrm
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 4:59 pm | Permalink

    cosmos
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 2:04 pm | Permalink
    Hank Price posted March 18, 2008 at 1:30 pm

    “Poverty isn’t the problem of our society, it’s a symptom of liberalism.”

    What percentage of your wealth does your wife provide? And since you served in the Navy, are you getting any taxpayer-funded benefits?

    Cosmos this is what started the discussion. I merely stated no one know what you live on or for that matter what I live on. Anytime there is a hard discussion like this about libs who do something wrong it inevitably turns to ‘welfare’ for our career military participants.

    Unless we are all going to tell how we retired and on what, then I suggest that military benefits with the exception of a big ‘thank you’ for their service should be off limits and not be used to demean our military.

    And by the way I don’t even know if you have a husband/wife or if they contribute to your support. Why is that knowledge any of your business when it comes to others?

  155. Posted March 18, 2008 at 5:00 pm | Permalink

    NN–

    That’s very interesting info. I did not know that and am happy to hear it.

    But it still doesn’t refute the point: keep what’s good about NAFTA and ditch the rest.

  156. Bentley
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 5:01 pm | Permalink

    JR: Sometimes mainstream media pick up on Limbaugh, and sometimes they don’t. They’ll need a new flufftacular before long because the public gets bored with these stories after a few days. So while Limbaugh and Hannity will still be yammering, the networks will have to alight on a new piece of hysteria to drive the ratings up. Now, that new piece of hysteria might well be centered around Obama. It might have something to do with Clinton. Or, maybe McCain will find his way into the cycle somehow. It mostly depends, by the way, on the partisan viewpoint of the beholder as to the extent to which a candidate gets picked on by the chattering class.

  157. JC
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 5:01 pm | Permalink

    Well now we know what Obama stands for… Mr Brownlee, let me ask you this, would you take YOUR children to listen to a pastor like Obama’s?? There’s nothing he’s said that I construed as “Grown-up” or “Mature” but very much the opposite. Mr. Obama and his wife have grown up with a silver spoon and groomed by Farrakhan and Wright to dress and speak smoothly, They are all worth millions, and have contributed nothing positive to society, They feed off the suffering of others by invoking hatred and self pity.

  158. Posted March 18, 2008 at 5:04 pm | Permalink

    Wow, JC.

    That was complete drivel–wholly without merit.

    Crawl back under your rock now.

  159. J R
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 5:15 pm | Permalink

    Hey it’s your pal Hank came on here blaming folks for their hard luck ksgrm.

    Cosmos makes a valid point.

    Back to topic.

    I’ve said it before but it is worth repeating.

    The love of the media is a double edged sword. They LIVE to move the story. This means that the natural course after building someone up is tearing them down.

    Right now? Every word pastor Wright has ever said is being gone through with a fine tooth comb.
    And not just by talk radio now.

    They’ll find more. And Obama has handled this the worst most inept way.

    We’re all political junkies right? What does a politician do with an uncomfortable truth.

    1) Spin it

    2) Bury it

    3) Deny it

    Obama is trying to do all three and at the same time. Oh that speech was a bit of impressive gymnastics. I give him that.

    But all it did is CONTINUE the story. It is THE topic today.

  160. Door King
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 5:19 pm | Permalink

    “Something is gonna give here really soon.” p.m. and ksgrm.

    If history is a guide, rich people will hire poor people to shoot even poorer people who want part of what rich people stole through laws. As in Central America and Mexico. That’s what is most likely to give, stupid bitches.

  161. J R
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 5:23 pm | Permalink

    Actually, there’s 2 recent tactics I missed.

    4) Refuse to talk about it.

    This is what bush did about his cocaine use and his service record. This might have worked for Obama if he had tried it early on. Too late now.

    5) Wait it out. Larry Craig found this one. But this won’t work for Obama UNLESS there is nothing else to find.

  162. Juan
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 5:38 pm | Permalink

    He said nothing…Maybe his best friend the preacher can find him a job. Between the racist preacher and the inbred Farrakhan..He is done!!
    Sad because I hate McCain and the female cow thats lying and running as a Demo.

  163. BucKCorvus
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 5:47 pm | Permalink

    I myself will be voting for Baraqi Hussein Osama.

  164. Bentley
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 5:49 pm | Permalink

    Obama has the lead in delegates and, even if Clinton wins by 10 to 15 points in Pennsylvania, he will still be ahead. Then they move on to the other states. He has a chance to do well in a fair percentage of those states, so chances are good that when the voting is over, he will be ahead. For Clinton to win, she will need the superdelegates. According to party rules, she can win if the superdelegates put her over the top. But most projected maps of the fall election show that a Clinton nomination leads to a rerun of the 2000 and 2004 campaigns, with the same white-knuckle margins in the same battleground states. She will need considerable support from Obama’s backers to put her over the top. It’s not at all unrealistic to suspect that some of these same backers will resent it if the nomination goes in the direction of a superdelegate override. So it’s a risky move for superdelegates to nominate her if she’s behind in pledged delegates as well as the popular vote. Perhaps Obama will decline in the remaining Democratic primaries to the extent that Clinton takes the lead by June. If that happens, fair enough. She should get the nomination in that case. But saying Obama won’t survive this is the equivalent of saying the leader in the Democratic primary should cower and huddle in a corner every time Hannity or someone else on Fox huffs and puffs and tries to blow the house down. Obama stood up today and made the speech. The campaign goes on. News cycles shift. And Democrats, to the extent that Bush got us into an unending war and McCain wants to continue it, should never, ever, allow Republicans to dictate the terms of the debate.

  165. BucKCorvus
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 5:51 pm | Permalink

    I do not see races or sexes, I do not see black, white, male or female. I see individuals, and I see a whole lot of irresponsible individuals.

  166. Econ101
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 5:52 pm | Permalink

    Capn, this quote of yours is flat wrong:

    “Racism is not an “idea” of superiority–it’s an act of discrimination that harms others based on race.”

    Actually, a racist does not have to have any power at all.

    A Racist only has to have hate in his heart towards a group that is “different” —

    Discrimination might require some amount of “power” but any idiot can be a racist.

  167. antianti
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 6:01 pm | Permalink

    If Phill Kline had quoted the same scriptures Brownlee would have tied him to the mast and spanked his arse red.

    Instead he fawns over Obama? (Did you faint, Brownie?)

  168. J R
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 6:01 pm | Permalink

    We begin to see a real possibility that the popular vote will shift in Senator Clinton’s favor.

    This will continue. I think Senator Clinton wins Pennsylvania by 20+ after this latest.

    And we know about momentum.

    Obama is now losing votes from both ends. The moderates will be put off by this episode. Those on the left are suspicious of his desire to work with Republicans.

    BUT he still has Olberman and MSNBC slobbering over him.

  169. Econ101
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 6:07 pm | Permalink

    There are only Three (3) Possibilities:

    1.) Obama agrees with Pastor Wright.

    Obama thinks that FDR KNEW Pearl Harbor would be bombed, before the attack.
    Truman was a RACIST and a TERRORIST to end WW2 by dropping the atomic bombs on Japan.
    America invented the AIDs virus to kill Black people.
    America “deserved” 9-11.
    Rev. Farakhan deserves an award.
    All the problems in the Middle East are the fault of Israel.

    Or:

    2,)

    Obama is an IDIOT! Obama gave over $22,000.00 to this Church. Obama’s two daughters work for a magazine called “The Trumpet” which is published by this Church. Obama was Married in this Church, and his children were Baptised in this Church, under the direction of Pastor Wright.

    However, Obama is an IDIOT because he did not know what Wright truly believed.

    OR:

    3.)

    Obama is COWARD!

    Obama KNEW what Pastor Wright believed, but Obama wanted the support of Pastor Wright, and the Black community at large, so Obama kept his mouth shut.
    —-

    Sorry, What Obama did today was NOT “courage’ —
    Obama is in big trouble over this. Obama has never scolded or challenged Rev. Wright on any of Wright’s hateful statements.

    If Obama had ever shown such courage, he would certainly have told us, TODAY, the date and the time of such arguments with Pastor Wright.
    —-
    I do not think Obama is stupid enough be believe all of the trash that Wright believes.

    I do not think Obama is stupid enough to not know, for 20 years, how crazy Pastor Wright truly is.

    Therefore, I believe that Barrack Hussein Obama is too much of a COWARD to be the Commander in Chief of the United States!

    If Obama can’t challenge Pastor Wright, how can he stand up to the evil tyrants in this world?

    If Obama will not protect his family from Pastor Wright, who is saying harmful, hateful things to his family and the entire Church, how can Obama protect the Country?

  170. Regular
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 6:17 pm | Permalink

    Unlike the Liberal wannabes that ask for social handouts from the government, the military actually works for their pay, pays taxes and do many other things that the fungus of America do not.

  171. cosmos
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 6:18 pm | Permalink

    ksgrm,

    What started the “discussion” was Hank Price’s claim that poverty is a symptom of liberalism.

    That makes Hank’s source(s) of income relevant. “Liberals” helped pay for Hank’s career in the Navy.

  172. cosmos
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 6:21 pm | Permalink

    JimmyMac posted March 18, 2008 at 4:25 pm

    Of course, you know people like cosmos would never live a tube under hundreds of feet of water for weeks at time like Hank did.

    Al Gore took two trips in a sub under the Arctic ice. One trip was with the four-star admiral Bruce DeMar, who headed the Navy’s Nuclear Propulsion Program.

    Gore convinced the Navy to release their Arctic ice data under careful safeguards to climate scientists.

    ‘Newly Declassified Submarine Data Will Help Study Of Arctic Ice’
    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1998/01/980129074316.htm
    “… The area is known as the “Gore Box” for Vice President Al Gore’s initiative to declassify Arctic military data for scientific use.”

  173. Regular
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 6:26 pm | Permalink

    I see once again, cosmos is getting chapped lips smooching the buttocks of the GORACLE.

  174. antianti
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 6:28 pm | Permalink

    Econ,
    None of the above. He is a ty;ical politician lying his ass off to get elected.

    Just like almost all of the others like him.

  175. J R
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 6:36 pm | Permalink

    Consistency is SO important Horst.

    Thank you for always being a jerk. Find a pistol and put yourself out of our misery.

  176. Econ101
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 6:58 pm | Permalink

    Horst
    I am angry at Obama for not telling Pastor Wright that he was out of line, long ago.

    I would be a hypocrite, therefore, not to do likewise, with you.

    Racism is ignorant and counter productive.

    We should encourage everyone to rise to their own full potential.

    It hurts all of us if anyone is “held back” based on race or ethnic reasons.

    I believe that liberal welfare programs destroy the family, and that causes a great deal of poverty in this country.

    I also believe that poverty pimps such as Jackson, Sharpton, Farakhan and — sadly, Obama, help perpetuate this Black poverty as a way to gain and keep political power.

    However, I surely do NOT believe that any race is smarter, dumber, more honest, more crooked or more deserving than any other.

    Your racist comments are actually hurting the cause of rational debate.

  177. Bentley
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 7:06 pm | Permalink

    Well, Clinton certainly worked with Republicans when she voted for the war, JR. Those on the left need not be suspicious in that case. They quite simply remember how she voted.

  178. writerdog
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 7:26 pm | Permalink

    I have decided that I will vote for someone who is dishonest, amoral and lacks any moral core what so ever. Who will lie to me and say only what I want to hear. Never say anything that is based on reality or facts on the ground. That will tell me as the chunks of blue bounce of my head. That the sky is NOT falling and as I stand soaked to the skin that the sun is shining and it is not raining. Of course I will, I am the average American voter!

  179. Econ101
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 7:27 pm | Permalink

    What Obama should have said:

    “Get over it, my Black friends!
    Yes, slavery has always been wrong, but WHERE did the word, “slavery” come from, to begin with?

    Eastern Europe was the target of the Viking raiders, centuries ago.

    The Vikings raided the “Slavic” countries of Eastern Europe, to capture “Slaves”. Many of those very White slaves were sold, sadly, to Persian and Arab slave traders.

    In fact, the Moslem impact on slavery, throughout the ages, has never really been explained to our Black community.

    I am not here, today, to point fingers.

    Every race has suffered, at some point in history.

    I am here to explain to you that the Black Race has not suffered anything new or different, in the course of history, save one thing:

    The Black slaves in America were at least lucky enough to live in a country that abolished slavery, without being over run by the slaves themselves or by neighboring tribes or countries.

    Every race is capable of evil. Many of our Black ancestors, sadly, were Free Men involved heavily in the slave trade.

    Many White Men, sadly, died in the Civil War, which ended slavery in America. Let us decide, today, that the violent sacrifice of the Civil War, the bloodiest, most expensive war that America has ever fought, is “reparation” enough, is “Penance” enough, for the sin of American Slavery.

    The Democratic Party was the Party of Slavery and the Party of Jim Crow. If we wish to “punish” America, for the past sin of slavery, why were we able to forgive the Democrats for their sins of the past?

    America political loyalties have shifted. Most Black people now support the Democratic Party, over the Republicans.

    However, it is time to stop the racial divisions in this country and admit the good that Republicans have done, to bring the country closer together, and to end racial divides.

    Republican President Eisenhower called out Federal troops, to fight racism in Arkansas.

    Every Civil Rights Act, in this Country, has passed with strong Republican support. In fact, we would have no civil rights laws in this country, if not for Republicans.

    Therefore, while I certainly have differences with the Republican Party, on many issues, I am not willing to say that White Americans are to blame for all of the problems that Black Americans face, in America.

    Now, let me explain my association with Pastor Wright.

    It was political, pure and simple. I needed his support, politically. I needed the support of his Church.

    I apologize for not confronting Pastor Wright, before now, for his Anti-American statements and for his hateful, racist statements. I apologize for not doing my part to stop harmful conspiracy theories that were promoted by my Church.

    I hope that you will forgive me.

    I do not share his views, I simply never thought that I could change his mind”
    —-
    If Obama had said the above?

    I would have clapped my hands and cheered!

    The above speech would have been true “courage” and it would have been much more honest.

    The above speech might have gotten Obama into the White House.

    As it stands, however, I think Obama is toast.

  180. Steven Davis
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 7:28 pm | Permalink

    “Therefore, I believe that Barrack Hussein Obama is too much of a COWARD to be the Commander in Chief of the United States!”

    Well, Barack, I guess that is a “no” vote from Paulecon – big surprise there.

    “We can only hope that Obama follows in the footsteps of other Anti american Socialist lovers like JFK, and his idiot brother, or the whore-monger so called Rev King.”

    I guess I am hoping the secret service will show up knocking on the Wessell’s door soon. I doubt they will be bringing candy and flowers.

  181. BucKCorvus
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 7:30 pm | Permalink

    I’m running for president next election cycle. That is where the Buck will stop.

  182. Roger Rowlett
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 7:33 pm | Permalink

    He made a peculiar factual error about Wichita and Kansas family connections in the speech .

    His grandmother Margaret Dunham worked in a Boeing factory in Wichita, Kansas rather than Fort Leavenworth. His mother Ann Dunham was born in Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, when his grandfather Stanley Dunham was stationed there during WWII

    It’s an odd mistake for somebody who built his career on researching his family history. His white grandmother, who raised him in Hawaii, is still living but not talking. His black STEP grandmother Sarah is the one who gets the press.

    Perhaps the first step in bringing peace to the races is getting the facts right.
    – Roger (formerly of Leavenworth, Kansas)

  183. BucKCorvus
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 7:33 pm | Permalink

    Barack will be our next president. He’s just one man, don’t expect the world to change.

  184. Econ101
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 7:39 pm | Permalink

    Roger
    Well, Obama also said that 10,000 people were killed in the Greensburg tornado.

    Anyone can make a mistake, but, when it comes to Kansas, Obama can not seem to get it Wright — Whoops, I mean, Obama can’t seem to get it RIGHT!

  185. Max
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 7:43 pm | Permalink

    Bentley
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 7:06 pm | Permalink
    Well, Clinton certainly worked with Republicans when she voted for the war, JR. Those on the left need not be suspicious in that case. They quite simply remember how she voted.
    ————————————————-

    That’s a BIG issue to “work with” Republicans on.

    Takes that argument away from JR, who will now have to admit he won’t vote for Obama because….

  186. Steven Davis
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 7:56 pm | Permalink

    “His mother Ann Dunham was born in Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, when his grandfather Stanley Dunham was stationed there during WWII.”

    In the interest of facts, wasn’t Obama’s mother christened Stanley Ann?

    http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/14/us/politics/14obama.html?scp=3&sq=obama%2C+mother&st=nyt

  187. J R
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 8:01 pm | Permalink

    Thanks paul we DON’T need your help.

    And do you have any idea how idiotic and perhaps telling it is that you capialize black and white?

    Oh and “Max” “James”?

    The racist accusation against me doesn’t work.

    If Obama is the nominee, one option I have is to vote for the Green party. Their cadidate Cynthia McKinney is black. Thanks for playing.

  188. Econ101
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 8:12 pm | Permalink

    JR
    “WE do not need your help”

    Who the hell is “we” ???

    Speak for yourself.

    You are NOT speaking for Obama.

    You are not even speaking in SUPPORT of Obama.

    Even if you were, I would say what ever I wanted to say.

    By the way, many Black authors and journalists have asked that the word “black” be capitalized, when speaking of the Black race.

    You are being petty and willfully ignorant.

    I have given you several links, in the past, in support of the fact that Black writers WANT the word to be capitalized, in that context. Those same Black writers think that the same should apply to the word “white” in reference to a White person, and especially in a comparitive sentence, where both White and Black, in capitalized format would be the preffered style

    Disagree if you want.

    I don’t care.

    But, I take my lead from people who know what they are talking about.

    (Never from you, in other words.)

  189. Boxlock
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 8:13 pm | Permalink

    CapnAmerica Posted March 18, 2008 at 4:42 pm
    “Meanwhile, the some of the same people that benefit (Hank, Boxlock, Regular) from living on the taxpayer’s dime b!tch and moan about taxes being too high and the damn welfare queens.”

    The ‘Captain-of-Victimhood’ I believe is inferring I live on the taxpayer’s dime (?). Not so, I live 100% on my commissions and pay 100% of my expenses myself. Very independent…if I don’t work…I don’t earn. All I do is pay taxes for others to live on. Those that have worked their careers and earned their pensions, if reasonable, I have no problem with of course, they earned it. And, I don’t mind paying taxes in reasonable amounts for basic public services and defense. I do very much mind supporting those that can and should support themselves. Every dollar taken from me to support them is a dollar my family is shorted.

  190. J R
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 8:14 pm | Permalink

    If you want to endorse Obama that will be ok with me paulie!

  191. Max
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 8:16 pm | Permalink

    Who is “we”?

  192. J R
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 8:16 pm | Permalink

    Nobody buys that nic either James.

    And anybody that capitalizes adjectives is a moron.

  193. Posted March 18, 2008 at 8:21 pm | Permalink

    “Yes, slavery has always been wrong, but WHERE did the word, “slavery” come from, to begin with?”

    Well, Econh, it sure the heck didnt originate with the Vikings!! You want to give some posssible logic to your point??

  194. Max
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 8:22 pm | Permalink

    Boxlock, you ever read The Forgotten Man?

    I posted links to it a few times in the last year. Hard working American taxpayers are The Forgotten Men (and Women now). This was written in the 1800’s when the woman’s place was considered (wrongly) to be in the home.

    http://www.blupete.com/Literature/Essays/Best/SumnerForgotten.htm

  195. NN
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 8:26 pm | Permalink

    Capt America: The original free trade agreement between the US and Canada was signed in 1988 by President Reagan and Prime Minister Mulroney, both Economists. For two economies with the same basic underpinning, it proved of value, amongst other reasons, for establishing a mechanism of resolution for trade disputes arising from thousands of transactions daily. It worked. NAFTA was signed under President Clinton and Prime Minister Cretien regimes and we’ve been under a cloud ever since. Americas problem lies to the south and far East. Try to remember that Wal-Mart just doesn’t import that much stuff from Manitoba.

  196. Posted March 18, 2008 at 8:29 pm | Permalink

    This is just tooo rich!!! Rowlett now would portend to be aable to tell us more qbout Obama’s Family tree than Obama has sasid!! Amazing how Rowlett seems to claim to know more about Obama’s family than Obama

  197. Max
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 8:32 pm | Permalink

    Look it up Chas.

    Can you prove Rowlet is wrong or Obama is wrong?

    No, you just shoot off your mouth.

  198. Posted March 18, 2008 at 8:33 pm | Permalink

    Logic Max… Logic… Is Rowlett a part of the Obama Family??? THINK, Max…

  199. Boxlock
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 8:34 pm | Permalink

    Max,
    No, I haven’t read it yet. But I’m convinced I’d be a lot better off if I spent more time reading books like what you’ve suggested, and less time sitting around wasting time arguing with the Demlibs on this blog who advocate socialism and criticize those that produce and earn.

  200. J R
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 8:36 pm | Permalink

    Oh and “Bentley”

    “Well, Clinton certainly worked with Republicans when she voted for the war, JR. ”

    No she voted for authorization of the use of military force.

    The blame for the Iraq war and occupation belongs solely to george bush.

    Please compare Senator Clinton’s and Senator Obama’s recent comments on the Iraq occupation. Senator Clinton is for ending it. Obama will give it some thought.

  201. writerdog
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 8:38 pm | Permalink

    My best friend was and might still be a member at the Immanuel Baptist church. He has taken a lot of flak over Pastor Terry Fox even from me… Until we had a heart to heart about it, he told me that he did not agree with everything that Fox’s said or does. But that Pastor Fox excluding some of his actions, is a good man and a great preacher. My friend also said he has addressed his disagreement with Fox in private as it should be done with your minister.

    I finally got to hear the speech, Obama was spot on and honest which of course makes him unqualified in some eyes. Some would rather be lied to, never spoken to like they are an Adult. Some agree with the partisanship and find an honest person to be dishonest when it comes to facing racism, partisan politics.
    As if they hate the thought that it could end, leaving them with no purpose in life.

    Obama stated his own grandmother made statements in front of him about having a fear of Black men. He loves his grandmother and she loved him. It was her honest statement, how she felt, it was a irrational fear she had. Just how she was raised and what she was taught. Is it racism? When I was growing up, I thought my own grandmother was a racist. It was never “black” or “Negro” when ever she said anything about some one whom was Black. It was always “nigger”, I got where I would try to correct her. The last time I did, she burst out “THEIR NIGGERS, NIGGERS, NIGGERS!”. I knew my grandmother’s history, I knew that when ever she went back to her home town. One of her dearest friends whom she would go see every time was a black woman. She lived just one block from the black community in her home town, daily she interacted with black people. I come to realize for her it was not racism, no more then it was on my part when the common phrase went from “Black” to “African-American” back in the seventies. It is just the figure of speech that she had grown up with and used. For her it was not meant to be a put down or to infer that black people were inferior.

    There is a lot of reality that we do not want to face, if we do it might reveal something dark within one’s self. I have that darkness and I had an incident fiver years ago that make me face it. When I said something in real anger about someone I truly liked. Something through out several experiences where I could have legitimately said it for far worst an incident and it never occurred to me to say or think.
    For years that troubled me, why did I say it to him and not those that had actually made my Junior high years a living hell? He is the only one I worked with that I considered as a real friend and yet I called him a useless nigger. Not just said it but shouted it at the top of my lungs! He had certainly not done anything to warrant it. Just I was needing to rush and he was not rushing to help, he had not hit me, he had not extorted a dine from me every other day. He had not bullied me every day, so why did I call him that when it never occurred to me back then to even think of my tormentor that way?

    Racism and Politics have something in common, people would rather say lies then to deal with truths.
    Perhaps Nicholson pegged it when he said the line “You can’t handle the truth!”.

    (BTW JR, paul is correct in that when using sn adjective as a noun such as referring to a group or a person it is proper to capitalize it. Though I have never heard that it is an insistent of Blacks. more an insistent of Holts grammar.

  202. Max
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 8:41 pm | Permalink

    Don’t go Boxlock, I like your posts!

    But don’t argue with the Libs about The Forgotten Man. Those who read and understand are silent. Those who read and don’t understand make stupid arguments like Chas. Most Libs can’t read this without self-destructing, or they can’t read it period.

    (Words are tightly spaced, but it’s just 2 pages.)

  203. writerdog
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 8:42 pm | Permalink

    And as you will notice I do not always follow Holts.
    It a blog not “War and Peace”.

  204. Phantom
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 8:44 pm | Permalink

    I think the grown up reference was to draw a direct contrast to the present bush childish type presentation.

  205. Posted March 18, 2008 at 8:47 pm | Permalink

    Here ya go Max… Our upthread friend Rowlett is just flat out WRONG!!!

    http://genealogy.about.com/od/aframertrees/p/barack_obama.htm

    That is SIX generations… Nothing at all about Leavenworth, or Leavenworth County…. Now, its YOUR turn to go read Max…

    And I have read your forgotten man piece… And, as I said once before, it isnt bad, considering the time frame in which it was written…

    Now, go read some genealogy!!

  206. Mod
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 8:52 pm | Permalink

    Raise your hand if you’ve NEVER taken exception to something your priest/pastor/minister has said from the pulpit.

    I’m sorry, let me rephrase that: Cast the first stone if you’ve never taken exception to something your priest/pastor/minister has said from the pulpit.

    I have spent too much time in church not to know that “the churched” have plenty of disagreements between and among themselves over – anything, everything. I have seen some congregants swoon while others shifted about in total discomfort at sermons and homilies. For anyone to sit at a keyboard, now, and insist that anyone else agreeing to be in the Body of Christ with all it parts, the unseemly included, is agreeing to brainlessly agree with everything that goes on with that Body is either a liar, a total ignoramus, or a blind follower to his own detriment.

  207. J R
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 8:57 pm | Permalink

    Well I haven’t been in a church since I was 8 or so. Well except for funerals and bingo anyway.

    Obama has been with this guy 20 years. That is gonna be tough to shake.

    And he isn’t really TRYING to shake it. Not that he could anyway.

  208. Regular
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 9:00 pm | Permalink

    I never heard a sermon preached at my Church or any other Church that I’ve attended that was unacceptable. Of course, they tend to stick to the Word of God, the plan of Salvation and extend the invitation to all.

    There have been occasion where I and other objected to certain Church business conducted, but that’s entirely different from what happens behind the pulpit.

    You’ve must attended strange churches Mod. Nothing unusual goes on at my church – Just worship, fellowship and the message of Christ.

  209. Max
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 9:06 pm | Permalink

    In 40+ years of attending church, I have not heard a preacher say anything objectionable either.

    Certainly never heard anything close to something I would have to say I “condemned, in unequivocal terms, the statements of” my pastor.

  210. Posted March 18, 2008 at 9:06 pm | Permalink

    Does your Church baptize babies, Regular??

  211. Mod
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 9:07 pm | Permalink

    What’s your church, Regular?

  212. Posted March 18, 2008 at 9:07 pm | Permalink

    I think it’s amusing how pathetic the media is. When the Republicans were having their “values debate” the people sang a song about how much God hated America but there wasn’t a peep. Now there’s the uproar about Obama’s pastor when just the prior week they were criticizing Obama for being a Muslim.

    On the other hand there’s McCain and his spiritual adviser. McCain’s spiritual adviser, who McCain sought out an endorsement, advocates the overthrow of America in order to establish a theocracy and desires America to wage a genocide against Muslims.

    Yet Obama’s pastor, who isn’t part of Obama’s campaign, made a speech that Obama didn’t hear and that’s something the media cares about.

    Yellow journalism strikes again. It’s the same sort of crap that the media espoused claiming John Kerry was a traitor to his country and Purple Hearts are the same as a band aid.

  213. Posted March 18, 2008 at 9:09 pm | Permalink

    GREAT point, Doug!! But, *duck* fast!!

  214. Regular
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 9:10 pm | Permalink

    Southern Baptist, the Conservative side. :)

    Not the separatists that split a few years back.

    My Uncle was an ordained Southern Baptist Minister for 60 years.

    Come from a long line of Baptists, all the back to the Pennypack Church of Pennsylvania and Wales.

  215. Posted March 18, 2008 at 9:10 pm | Permalink

    Mod, we dont need to ask that question, do we??

  216. Regular
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 9:11 pm | Permalink

    should read all the back…

    blood sugar down to 60 – need a snack. :D bbl

  217. Posted March 18, 2008 at 9:13 pm | Permalink

    Southern Baptist? You mean the same Southern Baptists that split off from the Baptists because of the slavery issue? Regular, I have never heard you renounce the Southern Baptist church’s promotion of slavery therefore you are not fit to be President.

  218. Posted March 18, 2008 at 9:13 pm | Permalink

    OK, Regular, we now know that your Church doesnt baptize babies… SOO what if a Pastor came in to the Church, and at the end of a service, announced that he intended to baptize the babies that were there???

  219. Mod
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 9:13 pm | Permalink

    I think, Regular that the “separatists who split a few years back” consider the reason for their leaving to be the denomination being hijacked by “the right.”

  220. Posted March 18, 2008 at 9:15 pm | Permalink

    You’re right on that Mod… :-|

  221. Mod
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 9:18 pm | Permalink

    “When the Republicans were having their “values debate” the people sang a song about how much God hated America but there wasn’t a peep.”

    Yup, Doug, and now that the USA is becoming the cesspool the Right have been telling us it is all along – still no one is making a peep. And these “conservatives on the right” who’ve had nothing good to say about America for years think they stand out as the true “patriots.”

    It’s mind-boggling to me.

  222. Posted March 18, 2008 at 9:21 pm | Permalink

    Right Mod. It was the reich wing that praised God for the 9-11 attacks and said how much we deserved it. Ever since the right has been begging for another attack in order to blame it on the Democrats. To the reich-wing having Americans die is considered patriotic. I think they take the “dying for your country” thing a bit too far.

  223. Regular
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 9:22 pm | Permalink

    Dunno Chas, all the Ministers or Evangelists that preach at our Church are well known to the Pastor at our Church and members of the SBC. Since it’s a hypothetical situation, I’m sure a few eyebrows would be raised, but it would be also clarified by the next sermon.
    —————————————-
    Actually no Doug, the members of my family were different denominations of Baptists until the 20th Century. The maternal side of my family were Missionary Baptists and only one made it out alive after the Civil War – my g-g-grandfather.
    ——————————–
    Dunno Mod, I didn’t get involved in the split, it was at a level which didn’t affect our Church. In fact, only a few people know about it with any degree of knowledge. Stuff happens…
    ———————————-

  224. Boxlock
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 9:23 pm | Permalink

    Max, thanks. I opened the link and look at ‘The Forgotten Men’. I am fading fast here so I bookmarked it and will read tomorrow when fresh.
    Thanks,

  225. Mod
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 9:26 pm | Permalink

    “Stuff happens…”

    So, Regular, it doesn’t matter that the Body lost some of its parts: a hand or eye or heart?

  226. Posted March 18, 2008 at 9:31 pm | Permalink

    They naysayers and haters have been looking for an excuse not to vote for Barack Obama. They have tried the “secret Muslim” approach, but that has been proven false. They tried the “inexperienced” approach, but Obama has judgment and wisdom beyond mere experience. They tried the “it’s not his turn” approach, but we have seen how that has worked out before.

    Now they can latch onto this – “guilt” by association.

    They just needed an excuse.

    Well, now you have your excuse – feel good about yourself – the rest of us will go on and try to repair the damage that has been done to our country.

    But you all can feel good about yourselves, you have your excuse.

  227. Bentley
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 9:31 pm | Permalink

    On CNN, David Gergen, who has worked for both Republicans and Democrats over the years and who definitely falls in the moderate middle, said Obama’s speech was the best of the campaign. It’s clear after watching the shows that Obama is getting solid reviews from all except those who have propaganda campaigns to run against him, and as I mentioned upthread, those campaigns will persist no matter what he says or does, anyway, as a given reality of the political landscape in this or any other election. Therein lies the bad news for JR. The chattering class has turned, in one day, from talking about Wright as a problem to talking about Obama’s excellent speech and how he likely firmed up his base and reached out to all who are willing to listen. I just watched the speech on C-Span and there can be little doubt that he approached the issue front and center, with real eloquence. Once you’ve heard a speech of this qaulity, it’s like partaking of the eighteen year old good stuff. After that, it’s hard to go back to the six year old sour mash out of the plastic container that McCain and Clinton try to pour.

  228. Regular
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 9:32 pm | Permalink

    #
    Mod
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 9:26 pm | Permalink

    “Stuff happens…”

    So, Regular, it doesn’t matter that the Body lost some of its parts: a hand or eye or heart?
    ———————
    The Baptists I know and am familiar with don’t use terms like that. We have Church homes, local associations and of course the National Conventions. The only symbolism in regard to body parts is usually used when the Lord’s Supper is given (communion.)

    The split btw for those interested was those more Evangelical Churches who wanted the Baptists to get more involved politically from the pulpit.

    When the majority of the Churches, like the one I am said no, we think politics should be kept out of the Church and from behind the pulpit, some Churches wanting to be politically active split. The Texas Association as I understand it, bit the bullet and stayed with the SBC for the most part.

    The Baptist Churches I belong to keep political jargon and political out of the conversation and out of the Church buildings. It’s the Lord’s house, not the Presidents, Governor’s or some Congressman’s house. We prefer to keep it that way. :)

  229. Posted March 18, 2008 at 9:33 pm | Permalink

    Max, I do have one serious response to your Forgotten Man… St. Matthew 25:31-46 — But, it MIGHT be a little bit too much socialist or welfare state for you… I do hope not, though!!

  230. Regular
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 9:34 pm | Permalink

    hope that made sense, blood sugar slowly crawling back to normal. :D

  231. Posted March 18, 2008 at 9:36 pm | Permalink

    Regular, check out I Corinthians 12, for references to “The Body” and that would be apart from the Lord’s Supper… The Body of Christ is just one euphimism for CHURCH…

  232. Mod
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 9:36 pm | Permalink

    I have to say, honestly, Regular, that I’ve never before heard of being a member of the Body of Christ referred to as “political jargon” before. That certainly provides a great deal of insight regarding your faith and values. Thank you for sharing.

  233. Posted March 18, 2008 at 9:37 pm | Permalink

    Again, Mod, I agree… cf. my comment just above…

  234. Econ101
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 9:39 pm | Permalink

    Chas
    You are wrong.
    The Vikings captured Irish and others as well, but the “Slavic” nations were the peole who ended up, most often, providing the humans for the Vikings to trade as slaves.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swedish_slave_trade

    http://www.viking.no/e/travels/etrade.htm

  235. Mod
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 9:40 pm | Permalink

    “it’s hard to go back to the six year old sour mash out of the plastic container that McCain and Clinton try to pour.”

    Yeah, McCain talks about being in the Party of Lincoln and I know people hear “big tent, inclusion,” but what I hear is “Civil War that resulted in the greatest loss of American lives in the nation’s history.” Not a good thing.

  236. Regular
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 9:40 pm | Permalink

    Yes, I know Chas, it’s just the Churches I’ve attended use more vernacular terms. Less flourishes and more appeal to the congregation. :)
    —————–
    Mod,

    Don’t think I called the Body of Christ – political jargon.

    I just stated that political jargon of any kind is kept outside of the Church. When in Church, we do Church stuff, celebration of Christ and God’s Word, all that stuff. :D

  237. Mod
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 9:43 pm | Permalink

    So, I’ll ask again, Regular:

    ““Stuff happens…”

    So, Regular, it doesn’t matter that the Body lost some of its parts: a hand or eye or heart?”

  238. Posted March 18, 2008 at 9:44 pm | Permalink

    ECON — Slavery in NO WAY began with the Vikings…. Are you familiar with the Roman Empire??? The Egyptian Empire??? WHERE do you get this stuff??? Go back and actually READ what I posted this time??? Please??? I dont want to make you look silly at this hour of the night!!

  239. Mod
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 9:46 pm | Permalink

    Wasn’t Moses a slave?

  240. lindainks55
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 9:46 pm | Permalink

    I think the youth are going to make a bigger difference in this fall’s election than most people realize. Their effect will be greatest if Obama is the Democratic Party candidate. And they seem ahead of older generations in acceptance of different races. This is also the group that is throwing the pollsters into a tizzy — cell phones are all they have.

    I have to admit most youth I am around are my grandsons and their friends and they are, of course, quite superior. ;-)

  241. Econ101
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 9:47 pm | Permalink

    Chas
    I dont wish to get tied up in another one of your ever-shifting arguments, but — was it not Obama that brought up the “Levenworth connection” and not anyone on this Blog?
    You seem to be proving Obama wrong?
    As usual, it is hard to fathom your point.

  242. Posted March 18, 2008 at 9:47 pm | Permalink

    Herre ya go Regular… Here is what Mod said, what you quoted, and your response…

    It did appear that you all have not heard of using terms such as “The Body of Christ” — Again, I reference Paul’s short treatise in I Corinthians 12…. Thanks!! :-)

  243. Terry
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 9:48 pm | Permalink

    Isn’t this the same guy that called for the firing of Imus over his racist statement! Was that because he was WHITE?? Here his pastor is calling US the United States of KK”A”?? And, here is a pastor that doesn’t say God Bless America but rather God “D” America? Obama can say he didn’t hear these comments when he was there – I would like to see those pictures of the Presidential Candidate SLEEPING in the PEW because he had to be!!! Makes you wonder what he has heard since he has been a senator – IS THIS WHAT WE WANT FOR A PRESIDENT???

  244. Posted March 18, 2008 at 9:48 pm | Permalink

    Ummm Econ??? NO…. some poster named Roger Rowlett brought it up, and I responded to it…

  245. Regular
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 9:48 pm | Permalink

    Sure it matters Mod, but the split by the politically driven Evangelicals was a choice made by them.

    As I understand the split was friendly with many prayers from both sides.

    I suppose the prevailing thought was if the Evangelicals want to split away from the SBC, then they should be allowed to do so and with no animus.

    It happened, people got on with their lives and on the side I was on, the non- olitical side, it was as nothing happened, because nothing really happened, we were keeping politics and the affairs of men out of the Church.

    The Church is for Christians and their beliefs, not political agendas. That was the stance. Stuff happens…

  246. J R
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 9:49 pm | Permalink

    “Bentley” I don’t know who you are or who you usually post as.

    But I do have some observations about Obama and his supporters.

    MOST of them are….comfortable. They are not hurting. SO they are ok with compromise and working with the right.

    Well there are an awful lot of folks who are not comfortable. And Obama has already shown he is prepared to throw people under the bus.

    Now Bentley you or Capn or any of the Obama supporters need to start answsering.

    Just what are you prepared to negotiate away to the right? Who is and is not expendable so you can get you cotton candydate?

  247. Econ101
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 9:51 pm | Permalink

    Doug
    You are wrong.
    As has been pointed out before:

    Pastor Wright WAS a member of the Obama campaign!

  248. Regular
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 9:53 pm | Permalink

    I know Chas, we refer to the Body of Christ and the Church in Sunday School lessons and put the Letters to the Corinthians in perspective of what was being stated. There is no Catholic or Episcopalian type of delivery in the Baptist Churches I attended. We study, we pray and listen to sermons, do charitable work, conduct missions, visit the ill and infirmed and etc.

    That’s enough to keep us busy without trying to parse what words should be used or not, that is, obeying the Commandments of Christ.

  249. lindainks55
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 9:56 pm | Permalink

    J R, Maybe you’re looking at this bassakwards. With a Democratic president and a Democratic majority in both houses of Congress it will be easy to smile and be gracious while the real work gets done whether the Republicans want to play nice or not. Have you not heard of the differences in getting elected and governing?

  250. Econ101
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 10:00 pm | Permalink

    Chas
    Stop it ok?
    I know that the creation of a “straw man argument” after YOU say something false, is your usual tactic.

    I don’t have the patience for it tonight.

    I never said that that Vikings were the FIRST to practice slavery. Never said that at all. However, Pastor Wright likes to brainwash the Blacks in Church that the Romans practiced Slavery against Blacks, leaving out the fact that Moslems practiced slavery against Blacks and Whites, and leaving out the fact that Vikings (and others) have enslaved Slavic nations and others.

  251. Mod
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 10:01 pm | Permalink

    So far, Regular, you’ve said this:

    “Dunno Mod, I didn’t get involved in the split, it was at a level which didn’t affect our Church. In fact, only a few people know about it with any degree of knowledge. Stuff happens…”

    And this:

    “As I understand the split was friendly with many prayers from both sides.

    I suppose the prevailing thought was if the Evangelicals want to split away from the SBC, then they should be allowed to do so and with no animus.

    It happened, people got on with their lives and on the side I was on, the non- olitical side, it was as nothing happened, because nothing really happened, we were keeping politics and the affairs of men out of the Church.”

    As for me:

    “For anyone to sit at a keyboard, now, and insist that anyone else agreeing to be in the Body of Christ with all it parts, the unseemly included, is agreeing to brainlessly agree with everything that goes on with that Body — is either a liar, a total ignoramus, or a blind follower to his own detriment. — ”

    You’ve made clear which you are, Regular. And, frankly, I’m above being baited into a name-calling session about it. I don’t apologize for the sorrow I feel at the divisions within the Body. I experience them with sadness. And I won’t apologize for making a genuine, heart-felt and honest attempt at engaging in a conversation about our divisions with you when you have devised every possible machination for dealing so dishonestly with the topic. Truthfully, I used to think you were an ignorant man. Now I know better, you’re a deceitful man.

  252. Econ101
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 10:02 pm | Permalink

    Chas
    Yes, and the Rowlett guy said that he had trouble with the Leavenworth connection, now you seem to agree with him, actually.
    You need to READ before you post chas.

  253. J R
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 10:05 pm | Permalink

    Sorry linda.

    But based on his own comments, I have reason to doubt that Obama is sincere in his party affiliation.

    I mean if he is not sincere as to his faith? How trustworthy can he be?

    Also? He has severe difficulties with simple facts. How many that died in a tornado a year ago and where his own grandmother worked as examples.

    Having no faith of my own, it probably is not my place to judge Obama’s faith.

    But I have no faith in him.

  254. Regular
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 10:06 pm | Permalink

    Well, there it is Mod, you were expecting a specific outcome and you got what you were searching for. :)

    I just gave the position of the Church I attend and what happened in the split sans details (because I don’t know all the details.)

    Sorry, I can’t change the facts of progression of what happened in the Denomination I belong to. Not sure what you wanted to hear from me, evidently you didn’t get what you wanted.

    If you have any other questions feel free to ask, the conclusions you draw are you own of course.

  255. Posted March 18, 2008 at 10:07 pm | Permalink

    Boxlock writes: “I do very much mind supporting those that can and should support themselves. Every dollar taken from me to support them is a dollar my family is shorted.”

    Wow. So you must be really p!ssed at Rush Limbaugh. He went two years on welfare when he was “between jobs.”

    You know who else you should be p!ssed at? Dick Cheney’s current employer, Halliburton.

    It seems that Deadeye Dick’s company figured that if they hired Americans through a shell company in the Cayman Islands, they wouldn’t have to pay for their employees’ Social Security and medicare taxes.

    Your and my taxes fund the sumofabitches, and they don’t even pay into Social Security.

    Real nice.

  256. BucKCorvus
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 10:09 pm | Permalink

    Isn’t this the same guy that called for the firing of Imus over his racist statement! Was that because he was WHITE?? Here his pastor is calling US the United States of KK”A”?? And, here is a pastor that doesn’t say God Bless America but rather God “D” America? Obama can say he didn’t hear these comments when he was there – I would like to see those pictures of the Presidential Candidate SLEEPING in the PEW because he had to be!!! Makes you wonder what he has heard since he has been a senator – IS THIS WHAT WE WANT FOR A PRESIDENT???
    Terry
    ______________________________

    Terry, you obviously didn’t like Obama before this Pastor incedent unveiled. If you don’t like somebody you’ll find whatever fodder necessary to support your opinion. I think this whole matter over his pastor is ludicrous. Yes I don’t like the fact that his pastor has suppressed hatred for White America, and that he himself is in denial about it, but that is his pastor not Obama. I can go to a bar every night and shoot some pool, it dosen’t mean I’m an alcoholic.

  257. Econ101
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 10:10 pm | Permalink

    Capn
    Take a look at John Edwards and HIS corporation.
    Edwards pays very little in Social Security or Medicare taxes.
    He pays himself “dividends” instead of a salary.

  258. Political_mama
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 10:11 pm | Permalink

    well of course you don’t disagree, your baptists are the hardline right of the right. Fits you to a tee regular.

    I’ll bet if someone told you that god was going to raise you into the air you’d believe it.

    Oh…wait.

  259. Posted March 18, 2008 at 10:12 pm | Permalink

    Roger Rowlett
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 7:33 pm | Permalink
    He made a peculiar factual error about Wichita and Kansas family connections in the speech .

    His grandmother Margaret Dunham worked in a Boeing factory in Wichita, Kansas rather than Fort Leavenworth. His mother Ann Dunham was born in Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, when his grandfather Stanley Dunham was stationed there during WWII
    ===============================================

    Sorry, Econ… But I can read just FINE!! Thats what Rowlett said…. I posted Obama’s geneaology that shows what Rowlett says here is wrong…

    Now, you gonna say I cant READ??? Yea, right!! Try again!!

  260. Mod
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 10:12 pm | Permalink

    “I’ll bet if someone told you that god was going to raise you into the air you’d believe it.

    Oh…wait.”

    *snort*

  261. Regular
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 10:14 pm | Permalink

    Not sure what you mean PMom.

    I just spent some time stating how our Church stays away from politics.

    How each member of the Church votes or chooses their political affiliation is not known to me. They could all be majority Hillary or Obama supporters for all I know.

    We don’t discuss politics at Church or during Church business or in Church functions.

    Let’s repeat that –

    There are no politics discussed at the Church I attend.

    Can’t be any more clear than that. :D

  262. Posted March 18, 2008 at 10:17 pm | Permalink

    Obama made a mistake regarding the number of deaths in Greenburg – a slip of the tongue – and almost immediately corrected it.

    If you are jumping on that as a reason NOT to vote for Obama, then you probably wouldn’t have voted for him anyway.

    Some folks just have to find an excuse………….

  263. J R
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 10:18 pm | Permalink

    This bit with his pastor is something that Obama cannot escape.

    And it will only get worse.

    This is the Democrats election to win!

    PLEASE Obama get out of the way.

  264. Posted March 18, 2008 at 10:20 pm | Permalink

    “You are wrong.
    As has been pointed out before:
    Pastor Wright WAS a member of the Obama campaign!”

    So sayeth the poorly read Paul. Wright isn’t a member of Obama’s campaign as I said. How can you say I’m wrong when you admit he isn’t part of his campaign? Sometimes it would help if you think before you post.

    On the other hand the pro-genocide Parsley is still on McCain’s staff as is the anti-Catholic Hagee. I guess religious hatred is so commonplace in the Republican party that nobody bothers pointing it out anymore. Republicans raised heck about Romney being Mormon but Democrats had no problem putting the Mormon Harry Reid into the Senate leadership position.

    The Republican party is just full of anti-Christian bigots. Kinda makes me look like a lightweight.

  265. Posted March 18, 2008 at 10:21 pm | Permalink

    Boxlock and the CONs say “racism is not a problem” and here’s Horst Wessel wishing that Obama gets assassinated.

    Shake hands with your old pal Mr. Jim Crow, RepubliCONs.

  266. Posted March 18, 2008 at 10:22 pm | Permalink

    You know what’s funny?

    What does Horst call somebody he really hates?

    A Nazi?

  267. J R
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 10:23 pm | Permalink

    Senator Clinton does not have these difficulties.

    And SHE is pointed in the right direction to fight.

    Obama is an unknown because of his own words. And we find more and more just how dangerous the media pass he has been given is.

    This is too important a time. There is too much at stake.

    We can’t afford to trust a candydate we don’t know.

  268. Posted March 18, 2008 at 10:24 pm | Permalink

    “The Vikings raided the “Slavic” countries of Eastern Europe, to capture “Slaves”. Many of those very White slaves were sold, sadly, to Persian and Arab slave traders.

    In fact, the Moslem impact on slavery, throughout the ages, has never really been explained to our Black community.” [Econ101]
    =================================

    Ummm… Econ…. You ever watch “Roots”???

    Remember who the slave traders were who SOLD Kunte Kinte and his people to the westerners??? They were Moslem Arabs… or Sarazans… North Africa was FIRST Christian… (Coptic Church) THEN, it was over run by the Moslem hoarde…. You know, when they burned the Alexandria Library??? And captured all the people, and made them Moslems, or else killed them??? Remember???

    And you say here that the Black Community here in the USA doesnt know the role of the Moslems in the Slave Trade??? How dumb do you think the Black community is in America??

    And I wont even POST the epithets that were used by Blacks to describe the Slve Trade activities of the “Free Men”!!! But, you better believe the Black community knows about it….

    I dont want to argue with you about it…

  269. Posted March 18, 2008 at 10:25 pm | Permalink

    Since when would Republicans hate Nazis? They still hold Scalia in high regard even though his father was a proud member of the American fascist party and Scalia has never distanced himself from that history.

    Then again there’s always the notorious traitor Prescott Bush who wanted to overthrow the Republic and establish a fascist dictatorship.

    Republicans love their fascist ideology and McCain is more than happy to buddy up with one of the agents of intolerance who want to overthrow America and establish a theocracy.

  270. Posted March 18, 2008 at 10:26 pm | Permalink

    Actually, Econ, I would just like to see you be genuine in what you are posting about what you would LIKE to see in Obama’s speech!!

    I guess it wasnt enough for you that he stated that what Rev. Wright said was WRONG… and DIVISIVE…. I guess that wasnt good enough??? Or did you miss that part of the speech??

  271. outlander
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 10:26 pm | Permalink

    Well, I’ve heard or read about every made up comparison and excuse for Obama’s relationship with the Right Reverend Wright, none of which hold much water. This revelation will fade a little with time but it’s going to have a pretty good impact, especially in the general election (if he gets there now).

  272. Mod
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 10:26 pm | Permalink

    Baptist Press

    http://www.sbcbaptistpress.org/bpnews.asp?ID=16718

    March 18, 2008 [accessed online]

    “Christian discipleship encompasses political engagement, Moore says”

    Posted on Sep 19, 2003 | by David Roach
    LOUISVILLE, Ky. (BP)–When most Christians think about evangelical political engagement, the first images that come to mind are organizations that assemble a potpourri of people to address a specific issue like abortion, homosexuality or taxes.

    However, true Christian political engagement extends much deeper than merely speaking to one or two issues, said Russell Moore, assistant professor of Christian theology at Southern Baptist Theological Seminary in Louisville, Ky. Biblical teachings on the Kingdom of God include a mandate for Christians to transform every aspect of culture — including politics, he said in a lecture titled, “Christ and the Public Square,” delivered Aug. 27 at the Louisville, Ky., campus.

    Moore serves as executive director of the Carl F.H. Henry Institute for Evangelical Engagement, a think-tank devoted to equipping churches and church leaders to engage the culture from a biblical worldview perspective.

    ___________________

    “When we think about how we’re to engage politically, one of the first things that we need to be reminded of is that the New Testament and the Old Testament are inherently political,” Moore said. “… The question is how then do we relate New Testament Christianity to a pluralistic, democratic society in which we live?”

    ____________________

  273. Posted March 18, 2008 at 10:27 pm | Permalink

    JR, what about Clinton’s membership is the cult known as the Fellowship which shares with it’s ranks lovely theocrats like Brownback?

  274. Posted March 18, 2008 at 10:30 pm | Permalink

    Clinton and McCain – more of the same…………

    It’s time for a new direction.

  275. Posted March 18, 2008 at 10:32 pm | Permalink

    “..McCain is more than happy to buddy up with one of the agents of intolerance who want to overthrow America and establish a theocracy.”

    Which one, Doug?? Hagee, Parsley, or D. James Kennedy?? LOL

  276. Econ101
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 10:32 pm | Permalink

    Chas
    Rowlett says that Obama’s relative was NOT in Leavenworth.
    You say that Obama’s relative was NOT in Leavenworth.
    Obama says his relative WAS in Leavenworth.

    NO Chas, it is you that needs to read before you post.

  277. BucKCorvus
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 10:33 pm | Permalink

    I thought us white people were above the racism directed at us. One thing I learned from MLK is that its the content of my character that makes me who I am, and not my white skin. Plus I’m a mutt anyway, white is a generic term, just as black is, I’m Irish, German, Cheorkee, and African. So you can call me a ton of racial slurs and it dosne’t anger me one bit. I can’t get angry at Obama’s pastor because I am above that, because his anger is based on ignorance and fear.

  278. Posted March 18, 2008 at 10:34 pm | Permalink

    WHERE does Obama say his relative was in Leavenworth, Econ??? I sure dont see that anywhere in Rowlett’s post…. Can you find it, or invent it, or something??

  279. J R
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 10:36 pm | Permalink

    I was not against Obama.

    But I take him at his own words.

    He is a Republican sympathizer and apologist.

    The biggest loser here is John Edwards. If Obama’s radical affilliations had come out sooner, Edwards might have fared differently.

    I continue to be very confused and disappointed with some of my fellow liberals.

    Maybe because I come from the right, I understand them better than you.

    They cannot be worked with.

  280. Econ101
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 10:36 pm | Permalink

    Doug
    Please READ:

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23634881/

    How is it that Wright can LEAVE a campaign that YOU say he was never part of, in the first place?

  281. Regular
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 10:37 pm | Permalink

    Thanks for the information Mod.

    Can’t say I’m familiar with the Kentucky Seminary.

    All of the Churches and Pastors I’ve associated with have been trained at the Fort Worth Seminary. I think it’s called Southwestern Baptist or something like that. My Uncle received training at Fort Worth.

  282. Posted March 18, 2008 at 10:37 pm | Permalink

    Oh thanks Chas, I forgot about Kennedy. But he’s dead now and worms are eating his holier than thou corpse.

    I wonder which “agent of intolerance” he’ll cozy up to next? Maybe he’ll give another speech at the openly racist Bob Jones University. McCain always did love a BJ.

  283. Posted March 18, 2008 at 10:37 pm | Permalink

    Econ, he was an advisor… NOT a staff member!! I think that is what you are having your argument about…

  284. Econ101
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 10:37 pm | Permalink

    Capn
    Jim Crow was a DEMOCRAT invention.

  285. Posted March 18, 2008 at 10:38 pm | Permalink

    When did I say “never” Paul?

    Reading comprehension, you should try it sometimes.

  286. Posted March 18, 2008 at 10:41 pm | Permalink

    Regular, SBC has a number of Seminaries… Ft. Worth, Louisville, Wake Forest, among the biggest… I cant remember where the others are off hand… I am sure there is a complete listing at http://www.sbc.org

  287. J R
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 10:41 pm | Permalink

    Can the lies and get out of our nomination process paul you bigot.

  288. Econ101
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 10:42 pm | Permalink

    Chas
    Context, man, context.

    We are talking about Obama’s church, here, and Obama’s crazy pastor.

    Obama’s pastor is on record talking about the “White” or “Whitey”?? Romans, the Italians who had Black slaves.

    Obama’s Church gave an award to Farahkan, the racist, anti semite Moslem.

    Obama’s pastor does NOT teach his flock that the Moslem faith was deep into slavery.

  289. Posted March 18, 2008 at 10:43 pm | Permalink

    Doug, you mean all of Kennedy’s TV broadcasts, are posthumous panderings???

  290. J R
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 10:43 pm | Permalink

    Take a look Obama supporters.

    We see here the folks you think you can work with.

  291. Posted March 18, 2008 at 10:44 pm | Permalink

    What are you talking about Paul???

  292. Econ101
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 10:46 pm | Permalink

    Chas
    Obama should give a catogorical list of what Obama thinks is “wrong” — because, at this point, Obama MIGHT believe that the government “invented AIDS” for instance, and he could get a pass on that at some future date.

    “Hey, I meant that I don’t believe the government is importing illegal drugs, on purpose, but I DO believe that Pastor Wright is OK on that AIDS thing” — he could say, huh?

    What, exactly, is it that Obama does or does NOT believe?

    Sorry, untill he goes down the list, one by one, NONE OF US KNOWS WHAT OBAMA BELIEVES!

  293. J R
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 10:46 pm | Permalink

    paulthecon says some jobs are worth nothing.

    He also says we will be depedent on fossil fuels ……….forever.

    How do we work with that?

    We can’t. We have to work such folk over. Bust them in the teeth.

  294. Mod
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 10:47 pm | Permalink

    “Regular, SBC has a number of Seminaries … ”

    But, Chas, mysteriously enough, the Fort Worth SBC seminary has absolutely no affilitation with the SBC or the SBC seminary in Kentucky that holds firmly to the idea that the Old and New Testiments are “inherently political.” Because, if the Fort Worth seminary did, that would suggest that Sunday services where the lessons of those great testaments are preached by graduates of the Fort Worth seminary would be – well, “inherently political.”

  295. Posted March 18, 2008 at 10:48 pm | Permalink

    Well, I suppose you could always wish for a fresh snow cone in Hell too…. Seems to me when the man stands in front of the Nation, and says Wright was WRONG in what he said, and DIVISIVE…. I guess some folks just cant figure out what WRONG means… or what DIVISIVE means… Sorry!!

  296. Posted March 18, 2008 at 10:49 pm | Permalink

    Paul,
    Time Magazine gave Hitler, Stalin and Bush “Man of the Year” awards. Does this make Time Magazine fascist?

    Perhaps if you didn’t know Farrakhan received his award for his charity work, not because of his racist views. But I wouldn’t expect you to be honest given your past ethical problems.

    And Europeans did have slaves. How does pointing out historical fact make one crazy? Paul, try thinking before you post.

  297. J R
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 10:49 pm | Permalink

    Paulthecon bigot has also BOASTED how he was recruited to beat up gay people in parks.

    HOW do you work with that?

    Barack Obama? HOW is it you propose to work with such vile people?

  298. Posted March 18, 2008 at 10:50 pm | Permalink

    I dont know Doug… I THOUGHT Southwestern Baptist Seminary was SBC… But, not being a Baptist, I could be wrong!! :-)

  299. Mod
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 10:52 pm | Permalink

    JR, if you don’t believe the “Right”/Republicans can be worked with, what do you propose we do, why, and how?

  300. Econ101
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 10:52 pm | Permalink

    JR
    I will assume you are speaking metaphorically.

    You? “Bust them in the teeth” LOL

    You are all blow JR.

    Otherwise, you would be dead. The world does not like sand box bullies like you.

    I guess I could whine and take what you just posted as a threat.

    But I know you are a coward and I have nothing to fear.

  301. Posted March 18, 2008 at 10:52 pm | Permalink

    Paul worries about what Obama might think. On the other hand McCain thinks torture is alright, war for 100 years is acceptable, having numerous affairs is pleasant, taking bribes is doing business, and creationism is science.

    Somehow the ethically challenged Paul’s discriminating attitude about candidate’s credentials doesn’t have much weight.

  302. J R
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 10:54 pm | Permalink

    We smash them into submission “Mod”

    And the time has never been more right.

  303. Posted March 18, 2008 at 10:54 pm | Permalink

    “Paulthecon bigot has also BOASTED how he was recruited to beat up gay people in parks.”

    Is that the same Paul who threw children under the wheels of cars during an abortion protest?

  304. Posted March 18, 2008 at 10:54 pm | Permalink

    JR — The Republicans certainly have their share of Radical Republicans… And then, we Democrat leaning folks have our Jerry Brown’s, and our Mario Cuomo’s, etc. etc. And our Dennis Kucinich’s and Barney Frank’s, too!!

    I think on some things, agreement can be reached… Here lately, it just seems like we cant find much agreement between the parties…

  305. Econ101
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 10:54 pm | Permalink

    Doug
    “Man of the Year” is a statment, by a magazine, which has to do with who ever they think did the most to change the world, that year.

    Obama’s Church gave an award to Farahkan?

    Well, maybe Farahkan could make the trains run on time too, but he would be talking the Jews to the gas chambers, just like Hitler!

  306. Mod
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 10:55 pm | Permalink

    “McCain thinks … ” McCain just wants power. We’ve done that for eight years. It doesn’t work.

  307. J R
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 10:56 pm | Permalink

    A good idea if we don’t meet again paul.

    Last time we did, you ran.

  308. Mod
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 10:57 pm | Permalink

    “smash” Uh-huh. Care to elaborate?

  309. Posted March 18, 2008 at 10:57 pm | Permalink

    And McCain would be taking the Muslims to the gas chambers just like his spiritual adviser wants. The difference between McCain and Obama is that Obama doesn’t advocate religious wars.

    You almost got the connection between Time Magazine and the church’s award. I suppose it was too much to ask for you to completely get it though.

  310. J R
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 10:58 pm | Permalink

    “Is that the same Paul who threw children under the wheels of cars during an abortion protest?”

    The same.

    And charges were brought.

  311. Mod
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 10:59 pm | Permalink

    Heck of a way to spend my vacation.

    Did you know you can stream episodes of the Original Star Trek at the CBS website?

  312. Posted March 18, 2008 at 11:00 pm | Permalink

    Oops sorry, the award was from Trumpet Magazine which is run by Wright’s daughters. I guess I shouldn’t have accepted the neo-con lies at face value about the award having a connection to Obama or his church.

  313. Posted March 18, 2008 at 11:01 pm | Permalink

    Econ, Ummmmm…. the “theory” that AIDS was developed as a part of some sort of biological warfare program, and got “loose” has been floating around since the early 80’s… I dont see where some of you all find that to be anything new???

    As for Obama being part of the same congregation for 20 years… thats pretty darned good for a person with political aspirations of ANY kind… And NO, it is not at all problematic that a person can be a member of a congregation that long, and not agree with everything done!!

    I have been ordained nearly 30 years in my denomination… I CERTAINLY dont agree with everything our denomination has done in that time frame… But for the most part, I DO like what we have done… theologically, socially, worship reforms, etc., etc.

    BTW, EVERY denomination has sets of what are — to use an umbrella term — Social Principles (or Social Gospel)…. That too is not a big problem!!

    I think Econ, you and others are just grasping at straws…

    It started with his ears… then it moved to “he’s not black enough”; then it was something else, and something else, and now its the Church he belongs to, and ONE of the staff pastors AT that Church!!

  314. Econ101
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 11:01 pm | Permalink

    JR
    I did not “boast” — I made the factual statment that I turned some gay-bashers into the police.

    Knowing you, from what you post here, how you turned the hose on a Republican politician, after previously voting for Reagan and writing “Fritz and Tits call it quits” on the WSU blackboard, after you then voted for Dukakis, but then marched as a “prolifer” yelling “babykiller” at pregnant women, and after you called for killing Mexicans by placing land mines on the border, and how you called for the abolition of the State of Israel and the legalization of Prostituion — well I think, perhaps, that given your constant anti-social behavior, no matter what “flavor of the month” cause you are on at the time, I think you MIGHT have been a gay basher?

    Hell, you have shown NO respect towards any group, on a consistent basis.

    I did say MIGHT, JR.

    However, there is no doubt that you are a liar and a very bitter, screwed up person.

    You know full well that situation I mentioned was completely honorable, on my part.

    I doubt that you whould have had the guts to do anything, in such a situation.

    I let those hateful people have it, verbally anyway, but that was a risk on my part.

    Then, I went to the police.

  315. Posted March 18, 2008 at 11:02 pm | Permalink

    “The same.
    And charges were brought.”

    Hold on, that can’t possibly be the same Paul who was fined for election ethics violations?

    It sounds like this Paul has no authority to lecture someone on morals or ethics. Otherwise he’ll just sound like a hypocrite.

  316. Econ101
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 11:03 pm | Permalink

    JR
    You lying piece of Trash.
    The entire Blog knows that I served on the Wichita Traffic Commission for several years.
    I was elected unanimously as PRESIDENT of the Wichita Traffic Commission, by Democrats and Republicans alike, who served on that board.

    Why in the world would they do that, If I had, ever in my life, put ANYONE in danger?

  317. Mod
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 11:04 pm | Permalink

    What are you two talking about?

  318. Econ101
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 11:05 pm | Permalink

    Doug
    The PUBLISHER of Trumpet Magazine?

    Obama’s CHURCH!

    And Obama’s daughters are EMPLOYED by Trumpet Magazine!

  319. J R
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 11:05 pm | Permalink

    I think you are in trouble here again paulie.

    Kinda like always?

    Ya stuck your nose in where it does not belong. A failing of the right.

    Now it’s getting smacked.

  320. Posted March 18, 2008 at 11:06 pm | Permalink

    Paul, before the election did you advertise your association with known terrorists? I’m sure if people don’t know you they’ll find you a lot more likable.

  321. Mod
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 11:07 pm | Permalink

    Obama’s daughters are 9 and 6. They aren’t “employed” by anyone.

  322. J R
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 11:07 pm | Permalink

    Uh

    I Think you have your posters confused there econ.

    A result of drink?

    I know nothing of your political career. I just don’t like you.

  323. J R
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 11:10 pm | Permalink

    Hey Doug?

    We disagree on candidates.

    Keep after Paul. I’m right with you.

  324. Econ101
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 11:11 pm | Permalink

    Mod
    I was involved in a civil suit long ago, there were never any criminal charges.
    I won my case, in several different courts.
    I was never charged with a crime at all.
    Dr. George Tiller’s attorney even said so, in a motion to the court.
    The hateful liars say I was “charged” with leading kids into the street to lay down in front of cars in front of Tillers clinic.
    In fact, the children in question wrote a letter explaining that I told them to get OUT of the street!

    However, Doug and JR are hateful liars who can not win an argument based on facts or logic, so they always go for lies and personal attacks.

  325. Posted March 18, 2008 at 11:12 pm | Permalink

    Mod — I think he meant Wright’s Daughters.

    And if I remember, the award given to Farakhan, had to do with fighting hunger, and poverty, and homelessness in Chicago…

    Farakhan aint much to write home about… BUT, the Nation of Islam DOES do some awesome community service “ministries”.

  326. Mod
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 11:14 pm | Permalink

    I see.

  327. J R
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 11:14 pm | Permalink

    His name is Paul F Rosell by the way.

    He USED to be proud of it. “econ” I mean?

    Though I can’t imagine how he was ever proud of himself.

  328. Posted March 18, 2008 at 11:15 pm | Permalink

    So what if Wright’s daughters publish the magazine? It isn’t the forum for racism and hatred that you dream it is. Maybe something was mixed in there between an article about trumpet players and a story on an AIDS clinic in Chicago.

    But it’s a bunch of Black folk not expressing the same dimwitted religious view that you have so they must be evil. Your level of bigotry knows no bounds.

  329. Mod
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 11:15 pm | Permalink

    Ao, ECON, how did it feel being pressed to go to court time and again even after you’d been cleared more than once?

  330. Econ101
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 11:16 pm | Permalink

    Doug
    Dont play stupid, I know you are not stupid, you are just another hateful liar.

    I made national news, in my fight with George Tiller.

    Every politician in town knew my name.

    Mayor Bob Knight appointed me to the Traffic Commisson, before I had won my case in court.

    My fellow Commissioners elected me President of the Traffic Commission, AFTER I won my case in court.

    Every member of the media knew my history.

    They ALL had more class than you, Doug, and the all had more class than JR.

    Nobody in the media has brought it up since.

    I served 4 years as Chief Deputy Sedgwick County Clerk and even longer than that on the Wichita Traffic Commission.

    Nobody in the media believed your hateful lies.

    Nobody ever brought it up.

    Besides, I won. I BEAT the lawsuit.

  331. Posted March 18, 2008 at 11:17 pm | Permalink

    No problem JR, if there’s one common ground we have is going after Paul F Rosell (the F is for Fascist).

    As for you Paul, was I lying when I said you were fined for ethics violations? I can provide the link again. Funny how you neo-con nuts often call me a liar but I always present the facts to back up my statements. I can’t say the same about you though.

  332. J R
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 11:17 pm | Permalink

    You’ve got your nose where it does not belong paul.

    And I HAVE offered suggestions as to where you could place it.

    Probably none of them as inventive as you have explored yourself….

  333. Posted March 18, 2008 at 11:19 pm | Permalink

    I don’t associate with terrorists Paul. How does associating with advocates of murder and violence make you classier? I’d love to hear this one.

  334. Nathan
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 11:22 pm | Permalink

    Econ101,

    Your family knows you are a good man. Your friends know you are a good man. Those you work with know you are a good man. I know you are a good guy.

    Why on Earth do you even care what JR and Doug think?

    You play into their little game of hate and lies when you even dignify them with a response.

    If they post a lie about you, just email the editors and ask for it to be removed.

  335. Econ101
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 11:22 pm | Permalink

    Mod
    It is called an APPEAL
    I defeated Federal District Judge Patrick Kelly.
    Every case that Kelly heard, in the matter, was overturned due to Kelly’s misconduct.
    Then, I got a new hearing.
    Tillers attorney wrote a motion saying I had committed no crime, prior to me winning my appeal, lol, that was funny.
    The purpose of Tillers motion was to KILL my appeal, as Tiller said there was NO THREAT legally, against me, as this was a simple “civil contempt” —
    But, that letter was useful later on.
    The “new judge” did not even ask me to show up.
    I was given a “new trial” but the new judge, here in Wichita, who took over after the disgraced Judge Kelly, simply dismissed my case.

    Part of the reason I want to get all this straight?

    There are at least 4 different people with my same name, or similar name, in the area. This is not fair to any of us.

    But, I have NO criminal record at all.

    (UNIKE JR, who admits to a DUI, but says he was innocent.)

  336. J R
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 11:24 pm | Permalink

    Uh oh!

    We have him monologuing!

    DO go on paulie.

  337. Posted March 18, 2008 at 11:26 pm | Permalink

    Where’s the lies Nathan? Paul already admitted he associated with terrorists and he already admitted that he was fined for ethics violations. Gotta censor the truth Nathan? That’s what makes you a fascist.

    Here’s the FBI’s definition of terrorism:
    “The unlawful use of force or violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a Government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives.”

    Looks like Paul’s Operation Rescue qualifies. No wonder some of them are rotting in prison for their crimes.

  338. Mod
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 11:26 pm | Permalink

    What was the nature of Judge Kelly’s misconduct, Paul?

  339. J R
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 11:26 pm | Permalink

    Oh HO!

    Paul is a pal of the Price’s?

    This gets better and better!

  340. Regular
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 11:27 pm | Permalink

    So Mod, since you appear to claim expertise on Southern Baptists, just how many Southern Baptist Worship Services have you attended and heard? :)

    As I said before, you seem to want to draw conclusions based on your assumptions and force others to agree with those assumptions by forcing the content of your proposal with fallacy.

    Since I’ve given you eyewitness report of what goes on in my Church and you seem to deny that report from me because of some Internet Website – just what is your source of authority for your conclusions?

    Or do you have any? :)

  341. Econ101
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 11:27 pm | Permalink

    Doug
    The Republican Party accepted the blame and paid that fine.
    I think it was the fault of the State, for not answering a question correctly, when the office called to see if a report was received.
    They said “yes” then sent a letter thanking me for a timely filing.
    Then they said the file was not complete.
    It was not worth an appeal.

    Kathleen Sebelius has been fined by the same body.

    Many, many Democrats have had similar problems.

    You are being petty.

  342. Econ101
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 11:29 pm | Permalink

    Thanks Nathan.

    I have to take one daughter to the Dentist tomorrow.

    Then, I pick up grand daughter from Rainbows United. I take care of her for almost 3 weeks.

    Oldest Daugher, only 25, is in the Phillipines on business.

    I have to get some rest.

    And, you are absolutely correct.

    I need to ignore this trash.

  343. Mod
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 11:30 pm | Permalink

    “So Mod, since you appear to claim expertise on Southern Baptists, … ”

    No, I asked:

    ““Stuff happens…”

    So, Regular, it doesn’t matter that the Body lost some of its parts: a hand or eye or heart?”

  344. J R
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 11:30 pm | Permalink

    Clearly, I have not done my homework on Paul.

    I’ll be correcting that.

  345. Posted March 18, 2008 at 11:30 pm | Permalink

    Paul, it appears to be your name mentioned in this article:
    http://www.cjonline.com/stories/041698/cyb_gop.shtml

    It says the judge fined you. Hmm, that would make you guilty of a crime. It doesn’t say the Republican party was leveled a fine, just Paul Rosell.

    Oops, looks like you got caught in a lie.

  346. J R
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 11:32 pm | Permalink

    Just so the record is straight Nathan.

    I renounce any respect I had for you AND your Dad.

  347. Econ101
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 11:32 pm | Permalink

    Mod
    Well, I said I was going to bed, but since your question crossed mine?

    One of Kelly’s actions was to go on national television and talk about a case that was in front of him.

    That was only one problem. Kelly made several gross violations of judicial conduct.

  348. Regular
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 11:33 pm | Permalink

    Okay Mod, you’re play games now. Tried to engage you in civil discussion.

    You have the same pattern that WSClark does, repeating the same question over and over and you get the answer you want to hear that is exactly your opinion.

    Any relation to Clark Mod? :)

    Or do you normally just post ‘bait’ questions and worm out questions posed to you.

    Anyway, tired – heading to bed.

    Next time you want something honestly answered Mod, accept the honest answers given to you instead of playing games.

  349. Mod
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 11:35 pm | Permalink

    We’re a treat, aren’t we? Hanging out here with people we don’t like whose minds we aren’t going to change no matter what.

  350. Mod
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 11:35 pm | Permalink

    I see, Paul. Thanks.

  351. Econ101
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 11:37 pm | Permalink

    Doug
    Get off your high horse.
    There was no formal “Judge” and there was no court room, in the campaign finance case.
    There were some Democrats at that same hearing, who had cases against them as well.

    We all sat around a big table and talked. Then they made their decision.

    I wanted to appeal the campaign finance fine in court.

    The Republican Party offered to PAY the fine, if I would just let the matter drop.

    I agreed.

    End of story.

  352. Econ101
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 11:39 pm | Permalink

    And Doug, you perhaps ARE an idiot?

    Do you realize that a campaign treasurer, or party treasurer, must receive all legal notices and complaints on behalf of the candidate or party committee, even if an employee, or the candidate makes a mistake?

    You are a very petty and dishonest man, or you are stupid. I can not decide.

    and, this time, good night.

    My kids and grand daughter need me more than any of you.

  353. Posted March 18, 2008 at 11:41 pm | Permalink

    99% of the people who were guilty could have been Democrats Paul, that still doesn’t make you innocent.

    I presented the facts, the facts show you were guilty, and all you do is whine. Truth hurts doesn’t it? No matter what you say or do won’t change the fact that you were guilty and had to pay a fine. Oh, but your temper tantrum makes me giggle.

  354. J R
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 11:43 pm | Permalink

    We disagree on candidate Doug.

    But what you have on paulie?

    More more!

    I want his scalp.

  355. Posted March 18, 2008 at 11:43 pm | Permalink

    The facts:
    http://www.cjonline.com/stories/041698/cyb_gop.shtml

    The facts are the facts.

  356. Mod
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 11:44 pm | Permalink

    Was filing the report late a mistake or oversight?

  357. Posted March 18, 2008 at 11:45 pm | Permalink

    Not much JR, he’s just one of those lowlife foot soldiers that is easily used by others. Just another peon in the parade taking orders, never being a leader, just another failure.

  358. Nathan
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 11:47 pm | Permalink

    Good Night Econ101.

    Sleep well knowing that you are a better man than some could ever hope to be.

    And spoil your grand daughter, that is your job of course :)

  359. Posted March 18, 2008 at 11:47 pm | Permalink

    Mod, probably just an oversight. Missing a file date isn’t a real crime but it gets Paul’s panties all in a twist.

  360. Posted March 18, 2008 at 11:48 pm | Permalink

    “You have the same pattern that WSClark does”

    Ah, you are just upset because I kick your sorry ass every day on this Blog, McCreepy.

    Creepy loser boy.

  361. Mod
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 11:50 pm | Permalink

    “Mod, probably just an oversight. Missing a file date isn’t a real crime but it gets Paul’s panties all in a twist.”

    I see.

    I wonder what it would have been like to be Paul. Make a mistake. See it as an opportunity to bring up the anti-abortion issue in a new forum. And then, have the Republican Party not support you in your cause and they just pay the fine instead?

  362. Mod
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 11:54 pm | Permalink

    “You have the same pattern that WSClark does” Apparently, that involves the ability to get back to the original point.

    You know, if Regular had just anwered the question I asked in the first place, he could have avoided being exposed for all that twisted, dishonest “we aren’t political at my church” stuff he decided to lie about.

    I don’t get it.

  363. Posted March 19, 2008 at 12:06 am | Permalink

    Well, this is a very busy week…

    Good night; Good luck; God bless,
    Whatever you conceive God to be!!

    Blessings all!!

    Hosanna in the Highest!!

  364. Kev
    Posted March 19, 2008 at 5:03 am | Permalink

    I thought it was one of the greatest speeches on this subject I have ever heard. While he made it clear that he does not agree with his pastor’s views on some things, he also made it clear why his pastor and many older blacks have such views. None of us has been treated like they have.

  365. Boxlock
    Posted March 19, 2008 at 6:11 am | Permalink

    Econ,
    Don’t forget as you fairly and honestly try to respond to your opponents….they are no more honorable than a pack of hyenas. They resemble those ugly creatures in many ways.
    They are cowards, too afraid to stand on their own but instead run in packs. They steal the meal of the hunt from those who have rightfully earned it. They stink and make obnoxious noises. They even turn on each other when to their advantage. They have been placed on the earth to primarily feed on the garbage and the dead.
    To try and show them a better way or even communicate with them is usually a futile and frustrating endeavor.
    But be of good cheer, they know what they are, that’s one reason they are so hateful, and they are their own worst punishment just being what they are.

  366. Amen Brother
    Posted March 19, 2008 at 6:35 am | Permalink

    Well, this is a very busy week…

    Chas you make me laugh. You got time to blog all day, call everyone names, put downs, and post hate but find the time to bless us all at days end.

    Please get off your high horse and stop defiling real preachers of Christ. Your pretending to be holier during each Christian holiday are making real Christians puke.

    Get a job doing something besides lighting the candles.

  367. Posted March 19, 2008 at 8:19 am | Permalink

    Chas doesn’t “blog all day.” He only blogs at night.

    Unlike most of these “captains of industry” and protectors of the American work ethic on the right.

  368. Posted March 19, 2008 at 8:22 am | Permalink

    Econ–

    Thanks for attacking Horst’s racist hate speech. (I didn’t see that earlier.)

    Horst–

    Now that The Eagle pulled your posts, what are you going to call them . . . uh, Nazis?

    Sucks to be you, as always.

  369. Regular
    Posted March 19, 2008 at 8:23 am | Permalink

    #
    Mod
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 11:54 pm | Permalink

    “You have the same pattern that WSClark does” Apparently, that involves the ability to get back to the original point.

    You know, if Regular had just anwered the question I asked in the first place, he could have avoided being exposed for all that twisted, dishonest “we aren’t political at my church” stuff he decided to lie about.

    I don’t get it.
    ————————
    Or, you could have just accepted the answer that my Church doesn’t discuss politics and have been done to it.

    Like I said before, you weren’t going to quit until you received the answer you wanted.

    What part of “There are no politics discussed at my Church” answer did you not understand?

  370. ksagnostic
    Posted March 19, 2008 at 8:33 am | Permalink

    “This was one of the most profound speeches i have ever heard. Yeah it would have been politically correct for Obama to ditch his reverend, but it is apparent to me that he’s not going to ditch someone so important to him for his own gain.”

    “That speaks VOLUMES to the ethics of Obama, he is one heck of a good man. I am thoroughly impressed.”

    Exactly.

  371. Posted March 19, 2008 at 8:43 am | Permalink

    Yeah, right, Reggie . . .

    Everybody knows that the Southern Baptist Convention plays no role in modern politics (heavy sarcasm).

    From Wiki:

    Support for Slavery

    Slavery was the “most critical” issue among Baptists. Baptists in the South believed that the Bible supported the practice of slavery, and they wanted to preserve the rights of ministers to own slaves. . . . This position on slavery and racial superiority was not officially denounced until June 20, 1995 when a formal “Declaration of Repentance” was issued by the SBC.

    A survey by SBC’s Home Mission Board in 1968 showed that only eleven percent of Southern Baptist churches would admit Americans of African descent.

    Takeover by Fundamentalism

    All of the leaders of Southern Baptist agencies prior to 1979 have been replaced with fundamentalist leaders.

    Women’s leadership

    Pastoral leadership is assigned [only] to men.

    A husband is to love his wife as Christ loved the church. He has the God-given responsibility to provide for, to protect, and to lead his family. A wife is to submit herself graciously to the servant leadership of her husband . . . she has the God-given responsibility to respect her husband and to serve as his helper

    Political ties

    Jerry Falwell switched from the Baptist Fellowship to Southern Baptist and founded the infamous PAC “Moral Majority.”

    Wiki:

    In 1979, Falwell founded the Moral Majority, which became one of the largest political lobby groups for evangelical Christians in the United States during the 1980s. The group is credited with delivering two-thirds of the white, evangelical Christian vote to Ronald Reagan during the 1980 presidential election.

    He also distributed a videotape through his political-religious BAPTIST organization which accused the Clintons’ of (among other things) killing Vince Foster and running a drug ring.

  372. Posted March 19, 2008 at 8:44 am | Permalink

    I could go on, but I think that’s enough . . .

  373. Boxlock
    Posted March 19, 2008 at 9:26 am | Permalink

    CapnAmerica
    Posted March 19, 2008 at 8:44 am | Permalink

    “I could go on, but I think that’s enough . . .”

    Good plan, as few pay any attention to it anyway.

  374. Econ101
    Posted March 19, 2008 at 11:05 am | Permalink

    A Black minister that, uh, well, does NOT support Obama:

    http://youtube.com/watch?v=khuu-RhOBDU

  375. ksagnostic
    Posted March 19, 2008 at 1:51 pm | Permalink

    “A Black minister that, uh, well, does NOT support Obama:

    http://youtube.com/watch?v=khuu-RhOBDU

    Well, uhm, OK.

    Guy seems to be a just a little off to me.

  376. Posted March 19, 2008 at 2:01 pm | Permalink

    “A Black minister that, uh, well, does NOT support Obama:”

    Wow! A BLACK minister that does NOT support Obama! Holy shit!

    Next, we’ll dig up an old white man that does NOT support McBush and a woman that does NOT support Hillary.

    Wow!

  377. J R
    Posted March 19, 2008 at 2:04 pm | Permalink

    Hannity is still riding this story hard.

    And he or someone has found more audio of Obama’s pastor. I figured that was coming.

    It is really disturbing that Obama got so far without this coming out. It’ll make me extra leery of the next political phenom. Hell even the right did not catch this until way late in the process.

    Again I am forced to wonder. Did Senator Clinton know about this and just wouldn’t use it?
    Or did she miss it too?

  378. J R
    Posted March 19, 2008 at 2:15 pm | Permalink

    Not good.

    Granted the source is Sean Hannity. But he reports that Obama’s campaign is stonewalling turning over Obama’s past schedule.

    There is an effort on to place him in attendance when his Pastor was making his particularly controversial statements.

    If he resists and is ultimately shown in attendance…

  379. ksagnostic
    Posted March 19, 2008 at 2:31 pm | Permalink

    I just saw the speech in its entirity. Finally.

    Obama hit it out of the park. It was exactly as Brownlee and Jon Stewart put it. It was a grown up speech, talking to us like we were grown ups who can actually look at things as they are, rather than simplify them to accomodate our personal prejudices.

  380. ksagnostic
    Posted March 19, 2008 at 2:33 pm | Permalink

    JR, Hannity is a shallow attack dog in the cog of the “right wing wurlitzer”. Still trying to go with the politics of guilt by association.

    He won’t grow up (because he is not paid to grow up), but you can.

  381. ksagnostic
    Posted March 19, 2008 at 2:35 pm | Permalink

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pWe7wTVbLUU&eurl=http://my.barackobama.com/page/content/hisownwords

    This is the speech, in its entirity.

    Watch it, listen to it, then try to see how well the shallow attacks by people like Hannity or Max or Hank etc. hold up.

  382. Posted March 19, 2008 at 3:01 pm | Permalink

    Y’know, “ksagnostic?” –

    I’d temporarily forgotten that all the anti-Obama people commenting on this forum had probably not heard or read or listened to the speech.

    Of course they haven’t!

    So I appreciate you posting:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pWe7wTVbLUU&eurl=http://my.barackobama.com/page/content/hisownwords

    “This is the speech, in its entirity.”

    Oh god! Don’t confuse this debate with the actual facts!

    “Watch it, listen to it, then try to see how well the shallow attacks by people like Hannity or Max or Hank etc. hold up.”

    Facts really interfere with contemporary rightwing rhetoric.

    Had the Reverend Mr. Wright had preached on Jesus saying “Suffer the little children to come unto me,” some right wingnut would have attacked Wright for wanting children to “suffer.” And another right wingnut would have attacked Wright for advocating pedophilia. And then they’d attack everyone in the congregation (or not, as it turned out with the Wright sermon at hand) with advocating making “the children come.”

  383. J R
    Posted March 19, 2008 at 3:19 pm | Permalink

    I did hear and also read the speech.

    Making the speech was a mistake. It only kept the story going.

    Now just because I am a Clinton supporter does not mean I an enjoying this.

    But it is better this is totally threshed out one way or the other NOW.

    Imagine if this had come out in October.

    As it is, just this one thing has moved the Clinton/Obama poll several points.

  384. J R
    Posted March 19, 2008 at 3:26 pm | Permalink

    It’s an awkward place now.

    He’s getting a slight break from the story because of bush’s speech and the Iraq anniversary.

    He can still try just not talking about this. That’s what he should have done to begin with.

  385. lindainks55
    Posted March 19, 2008 at 3:31 pm | Permalink

    Although we have all acknowledged that polls can prove or disprove whatever and we only believe them when they agree with our opinions, THIS TIME I think polls are farther from reality than ever.

    Remember when all the polls showed Kerry ahead? Remember how shocked everyone was when bush won a second term? (Yes, all you who want to jump in and say you weren’t shocked ’cause you knew it all the time, it wasn’t what the polls reflected.) And, think of the polls and the results of the primaries this winter. Caught them off guard more than a few times!

    Pollsters haven’t changed their methods to keep up with today. They’re scrambling and more than ever not a good barometer.

  386. ksagnostic
    Posted March 19, 2008 at 3:32 pm | Permalink

    “I did hear and also read the speech.

    “Making the speech was a mistake. It only kept the story going.

    “Now just because I am a Clinton supporter does not mean I an enjoying this.

    “But it is better this is totally threshed out one way or the other NOW.

    “Imagine if this had come out in October.

    “As it is, just this one thing has moved the Clinton/Obama poll several points.”

    1) The polling after the speech has not really been done yet.

    2) No, the speech was not a mistake. Pretending he could wait it out would have been a mistake.

    Remember John Kerry?

  387. lindainks55
    Posted March 19, 2008 at 3:35 pm | Permalink

    J R seems possessed of this situation and his opinion of what is / was / should / shouldn’t have been. You’ll never change the mind of one possessed of an idea. Maybe someone who is convinced will listen but never someone who is possessed.

  388. ksagnostic
    Posted March 19, 2008 at 3:37 pm | Permalink

    BTW, Jr.

    Obama has not claimed not to be present whenever Wright made controversial comments he disagreed with.

    Being in a UU church, I can also tell you for certain that I have been in attendance when the minister has made controversial comments with which I have strongly disagreed.

    The controversy is whether Obama was present during one particular set of comments that some loser from NewMax claims Obama was there for, even though evidence indicates that Obama gave a speech at Miami the same day. When one also works in the time change (Miama on Eastern, Chicago on Central), the idea that Obama was there and yet made it to his speech in Miami strains credulity.

    But the NewsMax guy will stubbornly continue to make his claim (even now, you may have noticed, he has been saying well it may have been some other day in August or maybe even July).

  389. ksagnostic
    Posted March 19, 2008 at 3:37 pm | Permalink

    “Obama has not claimed not to be present whenever Wright made controversial comments he disagreed with.”

    In fact, in his speech, he categorically indicated the opposite.

  390. Posted March 19, 2008 at 3:38 pm | Permalink

    What worries me is what’s going to happen if Clinton successfully finesses the convention to get the nomination, even though she doesn’t have the elected delegates and the popular vote.

    Now, that would be a major disaster.

  391. lindainks55
    Posted March 19, 2008 at 3:42 pm | Permalink

    I worry about that too. I heard her asking Obama to join her in her thinking about the Florida and Michigan delegates.

    This all after the fact that they all agreed on the rules, all knew the consequences of breaking the rules, broke the rules waaaay in advance and were reminded again and again that those primary dates would break the rules and bring these consequences.

    In fact, this is the first time my support of Hillary Clinton has wavered.

  392. Regular
    Posted March 19, 2008 at 3:43 pm | Permalink

    As I said before Capn, I know it’s a challenge for you Radical Left to gather up any type of attention to span across two or more words, but here it is again:

    “There are no politics discussed at my Church”

    I frankly don’t care what Falwell discussed. As I discussed earlier, the Evangelical types split away because they wanted to be political from the pulpit.

    The Church I belong to do not participate in politics from the pulpit nor have discussions of politics in the Church.

  393. lindainks55
    Posted March 19, 2008 at 3:43 pm | Permalink

    I don’t think she wants to piss off many of the women of my age group!

  394. lindainks55
    Posted March 19, 2008 at 3:44 pm | Permalink

    You and your church weren’t mentioned in this discussion. Everything isn’t about you, Regular.

  395. Regular
    Posted March 19, 2008 at 3:48 pm | Permalink

    Attention span lindainks55, attention span…

    read the Capn’s comments aimed at me:

    http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/03/obama-speech-bold-moving-grown-up/#comment-315752

  396. lindainks55
    Posted March 19, 2008 at 3:50 pm | Permalink

    You see, I’m not interested in what someone said about you. Right now, a discussion was being held and it didn’t happen to be about you. But you can talk about you if that’s what you want. Free speech and all that.

  397. Posted March 19, 2008 at 3:54 pm | Permalink

    William Greider in The Nation:If you understand the risks Obama undertook, you can see the beauty and pain in what he did. He could not back away from the risks without betraying himself and all those people who are part of him. On the other hand, he was putting at risk his own great promise as a politician. In psychological terms, what’s extraordinary is his refusal to split off himself and his own experience from those others. So he embraced them, knowing the risks. Then he tells us–audaciously–that we are capable of doing the same. Yet most of us do the opposite in everyday life, defining ourselves in contrast to the others we are not, idealizing our own selves by demonizing the others. Obama knows all this. He still insists we can do it. He has seen it happen in life.

  398. cosmos
    Posted March 19, 2008 at 3:55 pm | Permalink

    ksagnostic posted March 19, 2008 at 2:33 pm

    [Hannity] won’t grow up (because he is not paid to grow up), but you can.

    It’d more accurate to say that Hannity is paid to not grow up. Faux wants him like he is.

  399. Posted March 19, 2008 at 3:56 pm | Permalink

    Regular saying that the Southern Baptist Church he attends makes no political references.

    Now that’s some major denial.

  400. Steven Davis
    Posted March 19, 2008 at 3:57 pm | Permalink

    The fact that this thread is still getting posts speaks to the power of Obama’s speech.

  401. Steven Davis
    Posted March 19, 2008 at 4:04 pm | Permalink

    The experts on this type of stuff were impressed by Obama’s honesty*, etc.:

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/18/AR2008031802649.html?hpid=opinionsbox1

    http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/19/opinion/19dowd.html?ref=opinion

    *But Paulecon did say last night that Obama was a COWARD and did not deserve to be president, so I guess I had better not pay attention to my lying ears…

  402. lindainks55
    Posted March 19, 2008 at 4:08 pm | Permalink

    Yesterday the speech Obama gave made me proud of him but I still firmly hoped Hillary Clinton would be the Democratic Party nominee.

    Today, Hillary Clinton gave a speech that turned me off so badly and made me so angry my support is wavering.

    I can’t handle someone who continues the bush legacy of following the rules she wants to follow when she chooses to follow them.

  403. lindainks55
    Posted March 19, 2008 at 4:25 pm | Permalink

    OK, I feel better now! I vented the worst of my anger here and then went to her website and sent off what I hope was constructive criticism in an email. I hadn’t even ever been to her website — pretty impressive. I didn’t need to go to that website because she was my gal, the one I knew would make the very best president. I sure hope she knows that my age of woman expects honesty, responsibility, accountability and rules are rules. You don’t break them. You might work very hard to get them changed, but you don’t break them at will.

  404. cosmos
    Posted March 19, 2008 at 4:34 pm | Permalink

    Steven Davis,

    Your WaPo link at 4:04 pm has a good analysis of Obama’s speech, plus some additional statements from Obama.

  405. J R
    Posted March 19, 2008 at 4:58 pm | Permalink

    Linda I don’t know how it is that you tell Michigan and Florida. “Too bad. You don’t count.”

    Some polling says that if the Dems do this, a large portion of Dem voters stay home in those states in November.

    As to Obama, the bad news is that MSNBC is still talking about this. And THEY are in the tank for Obama.

    I don’t see how he gets away from this. The people who will be moved by the sound bite of the screaming Pastor ranting “God damn America!” Those people don’t post here. They are not political junkies like us.

    But they will vote. And the Pastor is an awful millstone to carry. Too, for Obama to pretend ignorance is insulting. Who could be fooled for one minute that you go to a church 20 years and don’t know what’s going on? Ya don’t get people to vote for you by insulting their intelligence.

    This is the most important election in recent memory. And I am no longer convinced Obama is electable.

  406. Regular
    Posted March 19, 2008 at 5:08 pm | Permalink

    CapnAmerica
    Posted March 19, 2008 at 3:56 pm | Permalink

    Regular saying that the Southern Baptist Church he attends makes no political references.

    Now that’s some major denial

    ————————————
    Pay
    Close
    Attention
    CapnAmerica

    I said the Church I attend doesn’t discuss politics from the pulpit or talk about politics in general.

    I know your pot induced stupor keeps you from thinking properly, but do try and focus.

  407. Rage
    Posted March 19, 2008 at 5:08 pm | Permalink

    JR does have a point. “God damn America” will probably been run alongside Obama/Osama etc, in 30-second spots sponsored by the Iraq War Vets for Truth or whatnot.

    If Obams gets the nod (and it’s ain’t over ’til it’s over), he’d better have a top-notch media team on hand.

  408. J R
    Posted March 19, 2008 at 5:21 pm | Permalink

    See that’s the thing Rage.

    We have what mrcontroversy has experienced with the Obama campaign as an example. And we have this latest example.

    Any political strategist with any sense at all would have had Obama quietly distance himself from this church a long time ago.

    Remember folks, the majority of the people, even the voting people in America are moved by sound bites. I wish it were otherwise. But that is just the reality.

    And the right and the media are digging now.

    Yes, again, it was a good gymnastic speech. And I am beginning to think Obama thinks he can orate himself out of or around anything.

    But sometimes? It’s better to say nothing.

  409. lindainks55
    Posted March 19, 2008 at 5:29 pm | Permalink

    It is the responsibility of those two states.

    The legislators in those states set a date for their primary that was against the rules agreed to unanimously. They were told these are the rules and these are the consequences for not following the rules.

    The people (voters of those two states) also knew months in advance their legislators were breaking the rules and putting their votes in jeopardy.

    WE THE PEOPLE must accept the responsibility for keeping our elected officials in line, accountable OR we continue to get exactly what we deserve — elected officials who disappoint.

    If those two states voters had paid attention in the months leading up to their primaries maybe they wouldn’t be facing their votes not counting. Now, they finally are paying attention and they should make their state governments make it right. They made it wrong and they should be who makes it right. If they hold new primaries, fine, then count their votes.

    But don’t go thinking rules are only rules when it is convenient. Don’t go thinking you can change the rules when it didn’t go the way you wanted. haven’t we had over seven years of that with bushco? I won’t accept any more of that nonsense! And Clinton supporting such makes me madder than a wet hen!

    The candidates also agreed to follow rules. They agreed and can’t now change that agreement and also keep my respect.

    I think maybe it is time we the adults of America agreed that Floridians just can’t vote any longer. Maybe it’s time we had the difficult talk like families who need to take the car keys from Grandpa for his own safety. Floridians seem to need someone to watch over them, adults to take away something they obviously can’t handle. Michigan, they just need to shape up and if the rules are wrong, change the rules for next time. This time they agreed and it’s their mess to fix.

  410. J R
    Posted March 19, 2008 at 5:37 pm | Permalink

    Ya know? I don’t understand the reluctance of these two states to fix the situation with new primaries.

    I mean their goal in jumping up their primary date was to matter more right? Well here we are! Too, there would surely be a massive return on the financial investment.

    It has to get sorted out some kind of way.

    Tweety Chris Matthews had an interesting idea.

    Both candidates agree on new primaries and winner take all. That is, whoever ends up with less popular votes agrees in advance to bow out.

  411. J R
    Posted March 19, 2008 at 5:50 pm | Permalink

    What does everyone think?

    Well Democrats I mean.

    If this came out in January, does it alter the results? Is it John Edwards battling it out with Senator Clinton instead of Obama?

    I continue to watch John Edwards with interest…

  412. Econ101
    Posted March 19, 2008 at 6:26 pm | Permalink

    Ever met a good con man that was not, also, a great public speaker?

    Ever met an honest man that had trouble putting his thoughts into words?

  413. Econ101
    Posted March 19, 2008 at 6:37 pm | Permalink

    Obama did not forgive Imus:

    http://www.abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=3031317&page=1+

  414. Steven Davis
    Posted March 19, 2008 at 6:58 pm | Permalink

    Capn,

    If you enjoy providing JM with multiple orgasms, please do mention his name in your posts.

    For some poor souls, being victimized by the vast lib conspiracy is the closest they get to emotional elation.

    I suggest instead starving these flaming and flame baiting trolls. But you should do what you think is the correct thing to do. Carry on.

    Stating in advance, JM, I will not respond to anything you say, just trying to help a friend here not enable you so much. Such is bad for you and worse for the enabler.

  415. Mary Caruso
    Posted March 19, 2008 at 7:31 pm | Permalink

    I like Obama, he’s the most intelligent candidate as far as I’m concerned and that would be so refreshing after 8 yrs of Dubya.
    I don’t care about his lack of political experience…maybe that’s a plus.
    He has the common sense to be a good president.

  416. Rage
    Posted March 19, 2008 at 7:48 pm | Permalink

    Well, I wonder: Bill Clinton seemed to come out of left field, but he actually had Washington connections, and several.

    Jimmy Carter came out of left field, as did Howard Dean. Joe Trippi said that Dean didn’t even except to become the front runner, and it caught him off-guard.

    I don’t think he expected to go this far, but, unlike Dean, was ready and willing, though this was originally than he’d planned (according to the Chicago Tribune, he expected to win re-election to the Senate, then run for president.

    I guess enough people kept bugging him that he decided to do it now!

  417. Rage
    Posted March 19, 2008 at 7:49 pm | Permalink

    wasn;t

  418. Rage
    Posted March 19, 2008 at 7:51 pm | Permalink

    Whatever–kant tipe! :) Let’s hope the Obama mafia (I’m playing off of Jimmy’s Georgia mafia is up to the task of official Washington. He does have some big guns, but one still wonders.

  419. Econ101
    Posted March 19, 2008 at 8:34 pm | Permalink

    Obama was slow to respond, but eventually, Obama led the charge to take down Imus:

    http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/obama_wright_imus/2008/03/19/81557.html?s=al&promo_code=478B-1

  420. ksagnostic
    Posted March 19, 2008 at 9:10 pm | Permalink

    “JR does have a point. “God damn America” will probably been run alongside Obama/Osama etc, in 30-second spots sponsored by the Iraq War Vets for Truth or whatnot.”

    So, he will have to respond. The speech he gave was very effective (and, to quote NPR, it has gone “viral” on the internet). He will probably have to address it again and again, and remind people that Wright’s words were not his. If Kerry had brought out the same guys who stood next to him at the Democratic Convention (you know, the guys who were actually on the boat with him and who backed up the official accounts), he could have derailed much of the Swift Boat Liars’ charges. But, the Swift Boaters took advantage of some very real negative feelings that many Viet Nam Veterans had towards Kerry, and Kerry the patrician thought he could be aloof. I don’t see that happening with Obama. Again, the right wing on this could be their own worst enemy when they bring this stuff up over and over, and Obama points out over and over, not MY words. It is when the right overplays their hand and goes over the top with nasty that they get slapped down. That nastiness is a real potential third rail (that being said, they have gone a long way towards avoiding that third rail by nominating McCain instead of some slick huckster who got primary pandering right wing religion like Mitt Romney).

  421. ksagnostic
    Posted March 19, 2008 at 9:13 pm | Permalink

    “Obama did not forgive Imus:

    http://www.abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=3031317&page=1+

    Idiot shill.

    Imus insulted the Rutgers Women’s Basketball team with a totally uncalled for racial slur. Wright’s comments, as has already been pointed out, including by Obama himself, had a more serious context to them.

    But there you go again, with Harry Frankfurt style bullsh*t. Say whatever you think will stick, whatever conforms to your view of what you want the truth to be.

    It is why, with a great deal of justification, you are not taken seriously. To the point that you are, Econ, you fail to realize that your kind of hard core coalition conservatism is a loser in this election with foul weather and swing voters. You fail to realize that your behavior is as offensive as Wright’s with you uncritical regurgitation of crap from places like NewsMax.

  422. ksagnostic
    Posted March 19, 2008 at 9:16 pm | Permalink

    “I don’t think he expected to go this far, but, unlike Dean, was ready and willing, though this was originally than he’d planned (according to the Chicago Tribune, he expected to win re-election to the Senate, then run for president.

    “I guess enough people kept bugging him that he decided to do it now!”

    Ironically, a number of pundits said that there would be no better opportunity for him to run than this election. I am not sure what they were thinking myself, but he is still running a very strong candidacy, and I think he could make an excellent president (I also think Hillary Clinton could make an excellent president).

  423. lindainks55
    Posted March 19, 2008 at 9:19 pm | Permalink

    ksag,

    Not that I think Paul is capable of understanding what you just said to him, but just in case, don’t help him or give him hints. He, like bush, are great ambassadors for the Democratic Party!

  424. Steven Davis
    Posted March 19, 2008 at 9:53 pm | Permalink

    Agreed, Linda,
    The lying Paulster, is the greatest case for change that the Dem party could make. LOL :)

  425. dougcline
    Posted March 19, 2008 at 10:33 pm | Permalink

    as

  426. abc
    Posted March 19, 2008 at 10:34 pm | Permalink

    at

  427. Max
    Posted March 19, 2008 at 10:35 pm | Permalink

    ksagnostic
    Posted March 19, 2008 at 9:13 pm | Permalink
    “Obama did not forgive Imus:

    http://www.abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=3031317&page=1+

    Idiot shill.

    Imus insulted the Rutgers Women’s Basketball team with a totally uncalled for racial slur. Wright’s comments, as has already been pointed out, including by Obama himself, had a more serious context to them.
    ==================================================

    Yes, saying “God Damn America” is not nearly as bad as saying “nappy headed ho” in reference to the Rutgers Women’s Basketball team.

    Damning the whole country, doesn’t compare to the importance of a few girls who bounce basketballs.

  428. ksagnostic
    Posted March 20, 2008 at 7:37 am | Permalink

    “Yes, saying ‘God Damn America’ is not nearly as bad as saying ‘nappy headed ho’ in reference to the Rutgers Women’s Basketball team.

    “Damning the whole country, doesn’t compare to the importance of a few girls who bounce basketballs.”

    Cerebral inertia. Remarkable.

  429. Econ101
    Posted March 20, 2008 at 12:18 pm | Permalink

    Are Democrats taken seriously?

    Well, ONLY on this Blog:

    http://rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/daily_presidential_tracking_poll

    McCain is ahead by double digits!

    No, I do not like polls, and they are probably worthless this far out, but don’t tell me that “nobody takes me seriously” —

    I have never taken a view or stated a view that did not have very wide support!

3 Trackbacks

  1. By obama speech on March 18, 2008 at 12:01 pm

    [...] flocked over to snap her picture. he eventually got up and left. …firstread.msnbc.msn.comObama speech bold, moving, grown-upObama speech bold, moving, grown-up Posted11:20 a.m. Barack Obama didn??t take the safe route and [...]

  2. By obama speech today on March 18, 2008 at 12:01 pm

    [...] be talking about race, through the invitation of Obama&39s speech today. …firstread.msnbc.msn.comObama speech bold, moving, grown-upObama speech bold, moving, grown-up Posted11:20 a.m. Barack Obama didn??t take the safe route and [...]

  3. [...] Read the rest of this great post here [...]