Iraq war coverage MIA?

iraqbombAmericans are much less aware of troop casualty figures in Iraq than they were a year ago, partly because of a sharp decline in news stories about Iraq since then, according to a study by the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. About 28 percent of those surveyed knew that U.S. fatalities had reached about 4,000. Nearly half thought the number of deaths was around 3,000.

“People are not seeing news about fatalities, and there isn’t much in the news about the war, whether it be military action or even political discussion related to it,” said Pew research director Scott Keeter.

The presidential campaign and economic slump have diverted media and public attention, but that may change: Iraq violence has surged recently.

180 Comments

  1. Phantom
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 6:10 am | Permalink

    Violence surged? McCain’s in Anbar drinking cokes from street vendors! Never mind, the vendor will get blown up tomorrow.

  2. writerdog
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 6:35 am | Permalink

    Should it be a surprise that there is an effort to conceal the numbers? Since there has been minimal progress politically in Iraq. The lower death count is all there is to show for the surge, take that away and what will you have? “He who owns the media owns the world”, somebody name Rupert said that once..

  3. Regular
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 6:41 am | Permalink

    Like ghouls drooling their decayed flesh in a graveyard, the MSM needs bad and tragic news to report – or so they think.

    I mean you know, it’s not like the young woman who recently received the Silver Star in Afghanistan made the front page news of the Eagle now did it?

    Or how about the outstanding Airmen at McConnell AFB who have made thousands of missions without incident?

    Yeah, let’s concentrate on death and mayhem. Break the will of the weak American people.

    4,000 people die in falls every year in the U.S. as well. If you multiply that by five, that’s 20,000 people that have died in the U.S. since the start of the Iraq war.

    The MSM have pulled out their reporters from Iraq. It’s not glamorous to report days without attacks or a soldier who has died to a IED. The ghouls of the press need death and mayhem to report.

    Heaven forbid they would be forced to report on good news and give credit where credit is due.

  4. ghotiphaze
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 6:50 am | Permalink

    Like ghouls drooling their decayed flesh in a graveyard, the MSM needs bad and tragic news to report

    Terror alert (it’s an election year)

    _____________________________________________
    Break the will of the weak American people.

    And I thought the will of the American people was to get out of the war?

    ______________________________________
    If you multiply that by five, that’s 20,000 people that have died in the U.S.

    out of 350 million. Now if there were 70 million US troops in Iraq, your argument would be valid

  5. Regular
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 6:55 am | Permalink

    Watsa matter ghotiphaze?

    Unable to comment on the story? Need someone from the Reich Wing to help prop up your weak arguments?

    99 percent of the comments rendered by the Radical left here are about other posters.

    And that says a lot about their mental capabilities.

  6. ghotiphaze
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 6:59 am | Permalink

    Need someone from the Reich Wing to help prop up your weak arguments

    actually, it was just easier pointing out your weak logic.

    “The presidential campaign and economic slump have diverted media and public attention”
    Well, now, that’s about a DUH!!!
    Not much more need be said.

  7. ghotiphaze
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 7:00 am | Permalink

    BTW, I’m actually more conservative than liberal, but ain’t neither of either.

  8. Komrade
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 7:05 am | Permalink

    Every time there is a soldier fatality, the media carries it so if anyone misses it, it is their own inattentiveness.

    Maybe they realize we are losing soldiers at a much reduced rate or maybe they realize that a much greater number of people die in the US from traffic accidents.

    Whatever the reason, we should all be happy that fewer soldiers are dying and that the Iraqi government is making headway.

  9. Political_mama
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 7:06 am | Permalink

    Regular regularly forgets that most of those fall deaths are elderly. If it’s not a fall that will kill them, pneumonia will.

    4,000 deaths of young people, for something avoidable, IS a big deal. I mean, we only lost half of that in the world trade center attack. I suppose that was no big deal either Reg?

  10. ghotiphaze
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 7:08 am | Permalink

    If it’s not a fall that will kill them, pneumonia will.

    LOL PoliMom, you’re not endorsing Forbe’s doctine of the aged should just get out of the way of the young? That’ll help keep SS solvent.
    *ducks*

  11. writerdog
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 7:10 am | Permalink

    The reporting of the daily death toll is out there, you have to look for it if you are interested.
    The over all average has been about three U.S. soldiers KIA a day. But then you also run into what I posted to an open thread over the weekend. The Iraqis are reporting higher death tolls then the U.S. military when it comes to the numbers of soldiers and civilians killed and wounded.

    writerdog
    Posted March 16, 2008 at 6:21 am | \l “comment-314016″
    No trend
    In other violence on Tuesday, gunman attacked a police checkpoint in Mosul, northern Iraq, killing four policemen, with four deaths also among the gunmen.
    In Duluiyah, north of the capital Baghdad, a suicide bomber blew up a truck at a checkpoint killing five people.
    Nine US troops and an interpreter have also been killed since Monday.
    Correspondents say the levels of Tuesday’s violence were reminiscent of the worst days of the anti-US insurgency and sectarian killings in 2006 and 2007.
    However, US military spokespeople have said recent violence should not be taken as evidence of a trend.
    “I think we need to continue to look at historically what has happened over the last year to really put in perspective a one-week or two-weeks’ worth of activity inside Baghdad,” said Rear Adm Gregory Smith on Sunday.
    Daily death tolls had fallen between August 2007 and January 2008, when on average 20 Iraqis died in violence per day.
    Media reports say the average was 26 Iraqis in February and is up to 39 so far in March.

    This is from the U.S. news and world report, I like Adm Smith’s reply and the military spokespeople’s.
    As to a trend, it is a trend when the death toll went down and it will be a trend when it goes up. Lower death toll is good, but real progress is when there is no death toll from all this. Again just common sense..

  12. Regular
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 7:14 am | Permalink

    Okay PMom, how about the over 200,000 deaths in the past five years due to car accidents?

    I mean those deaths are insignificant right? Ole Democrapic Congressman Joe Hardblow can’t demagogue about the War in Iraq while secretly voting voting for funding can he?

    The World Trade Center was a single incident and of course it is significant, because the people that died were non-combatants; heck – they were just going to work, living their lives. You know, Joe and Jill average citizens living the American Dream and that was taken away.

    But do continue on with your Radical Left Talking Points PMom, one day you might actually start believing what you say and write – wait, too late for that. :)

  13. Hud
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 7:18 am | Permalink

    “Regular regularly forgets that most of those fall deaths are elderly. If it’s not a fall that will kill them, pneumonia will.”

    So when am I suppose to get pneumonia?

  14. fleettwood
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 7:30 am | Permalink

    Perhaps Randy means, “Iraq violence has “so called” surged recently.

  15. TDT
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 7:48 am | Permalink

    Regular – YOu very often attack those of us that do not support the war, saying that we do not support the troops. Then, when the subject of casualties are brought up, you give statistics to show the INSIGNIFICANCE of the 4000 soldiers killed. I would say it is you that do not support our troops.

  16. ghotiphaze
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 7:48 am | Permalink

    Okay PMom, how about the over 200,000 deaths in the past five years due to car accidents?

    Correlate passenger miles/deaths of US in US against US passenger miles/deaths in Iraq.

  17. Regular
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 7:49 am | Permalink

    Regular
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 6:55 am | Permalink

    99 percent of the comments rendered by the Radical left here are about other posters.

    And that says a lot about their mental capabilities

    Still holding true thus far…

  18. ghotiphaze
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 7:51 am | Permalink

    And considering that the preponderance of auto fatalities are caused by those near 16 of age, are you insisting we start sending 16 YOs to Iraq to make your statistics more valid?

  19. ghotiphaze
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 7:57 am | Permalink

    99 percent of the comments rendered by the Radical left here are about other posters.

    And that says a lot about their mental capabilities

    Still holding true thus far…

    Translation: I can’t think worth a darn so I’ll blame all the people showing how stupid I am.

    Reg, I’ve tried being nice and showing you how truncated your thought processes are. You’re the one not willing to listen and give a thought; you’d just rather say everyone else is wrong. But, by all means, continue thinking that way. It’s what has made this administration so great.

  20. Regular
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 7:59 am | Permalink

    And it bears repeating…

    Regular
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 6:55 am | Permalink

    99 percent of the comments rendered by the Radical left here are about other posters.

    And that says a lot about their mental capabilities

    Yes, it appears to be the pattern.

  21. American Way
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 8:02 am | Permalink

    Gee, we haven’t heard any positive stories about American troops helping in Iraq. Their biggest complaint is that the press only provides the negatives. The body count.

    Here the Eagle confirms that.

  22. lindainks55
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 8:02 am | Permalink

    Why would anyone even bring up deaths from another cause? What comparison are they attempting?

    Other than the stupid one trying to say a person isn’t concerned with ______ deaths so why should they be concerned with war deaths. Most thinking people would try everything possible to prevent deaths from any cause. War deaths seem easier to prevent — stop the war and the deaths stop from that cause.

  23. ghotiphaze
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 8:04 am | Permalink

    Most thinking people would try everything possible to prevent deaths from any cause.

    Do you want to live forever, barbarian?
    *ducks*

  24. American Way
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 8:04 am | Permalink

    “Should it be a surprise that there is an effort to conceal the numbers?”

    Writer Dog there is no vast right-wing conspiracy here. The DoD publishes the casualty counts on their website. You can find injuries/deaths any time you like only a few keyboard strokes away.

    This information is available at a number of websites, but I think they all get confirmation from the Pentegon.

    Nothing here. Move along.

  25. Regular
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 8:05 am | Permalink

    1/3 of all traffic deaths are caused by excessive speed, a personal choice and an irresponsible one. 67,000 deaths per year because people think they are ‘expert’ drivers or just mindlessly irresponsible.

  26. lindainks55
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 8:05 am | Permalink

    No, some days “today” seems too long. But then I’m not trying to compare this situation to another that isn’t comparable.

  27. Regular
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 8:06 am | Permalink

    oops (blush) that should be 13,333 deaths per year due to speeding

  28. ghotiphaze
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 8:06 am | Permalink

    Writer Dog there is no vast right-wing conspiracy here

    Yeah, AmWay, I had trouble with that line, too. I figure if you want to know the death count, just get a hand clicker and snap it as fast as you can, and you won’t be far off.
    (ok, cheap shot, but I’m a cheap guy)

  29. ghotiphaze
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 8:12 am | Permalink

    3000 died in WTC. Out of 350 million Americans, that puts the odds at 1/100,000. the chance of dying any particular year for a meteor strike: 1/100,000. WTC was 6.5 years ago. I should be more afraid of asteroids than El Keeta.

    I can warp any two statistics just as well as you can
    8^b~~~~

  30. outlander
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 8:12 am | Permalink

    Well, since the MSM is in charge of what is in the news, this is an article from the MSM about why the MSM doesn’t cover Iraq as much. Darn interesting.

    Snore…

  31. Mary Caruso
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 8:13 am | Permalink

    When one doesn’t have to be involved, it’s easy to put it on the back burner, especially given America’s short attention span. I believe in the draft, only because it FORCES the American public to be involved in a war…this whole fiasco would have been over a long time ago if the sacrifice was shared equally and it affected the lives of every American. But..out of sight, out of mind…

  32. ghotiphaze
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 8:15 am | Permalink

    I believe in the draft too, Mary, but only for the affluent and rich. Be a whole lot less wars going on when they have something to lose instead of everything to gain.

  33. Regular
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 8:23 am | Permalink

    There are dozens of Websites that support the troops, sending care packages, helping out the troops with communications and providing support. Then there is the Red Cross and other supporting organizations.

    More time devoted to positive influences in supporting troops, means less time rolling in one’s own emotions of pity and finger pointing.

    I remember getting a card from a second grade class, all marked up in crayon during the First Gulf War. It made my day, week and year and brought back to me the importance of home and the real America I cared about.

    Stuff like that matters.

    Whining and pointing fingers only matters to whiners and finger pointers.

  34. ghotiphaze
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 8:25 am | Permalink

    Then there is the Red Cross
    I’m nearing 13 gallon donor status. But I’m sure that just goes stateside. I’d bring the troops home if I could, but they won’t listen to me.

  35. Mary Caruso
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 8:30 am | Permalink

    If every member of the Congress and Senate had the chance of sacrificing their kids…we would never have gone there in the first place.

  36. Mary Caruso
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 8:36 am | Permalink

    Off the subject a little..over the weekend my 18 year old nephew went camping with his friends and they got busted for having beer.
    Doesn’t it seem a little strange that, at his age, he’s considered man enough to vote and fight and possibly die for his country..but not old enough to drink a beer?
    What’s wrong with this picture?

  37. ghotiphaze
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 8:42 am | Permalink

    he can drink beer on base.

    While I was stationed at NAS Memphis, most bartenders held the contention that if you were in the service and old enough to die for your country, you were old enough to drink. Then again, when my birthday rolled around and the bar had bought me several free drinks they asked how old I was then. they about freaked when I told them it was my 18th birthday. They’d been serving me drinks for almost 4 months already.

  38. Komrade
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 8:49 am | Permalink

    “Why would anyone even bring up deaths from another cause? What comparison are they attempting?

    Other than the stupid one trying to say a person isn’t concerned with ______ deaths so why should they be concerned with war deaths.”

    ———————–

    They’re trying to point out the hypocrisy and political pandering of a group of people that want to point to the death toll of soldiers while they turn a blind eye to things that cause much creater death counts.

    If you think that’s stupid, lindadink, you just might be one of the hypocrites.

  39. Komrade
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 8:51 am | Permalink

    “If every member of the Congress and Senate had the chance of sacrificing their kids…we would never have gone there in the first place.”

    ——————-

    Sure we would have. Only it would have been with nuclear weapons and Iraq would now be a sea of glass.

  40. Steven Davis
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 8:51 am | Permalink

    I am for a tax to pay for this war. That would help keep it in the public’s attention and would also end it shortly.

    Did anyone see this editorial about Iraq and oil?

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/14/AR2008031403376.html?hpid=opinionsbox1

  41. Max
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 8:55 am | Permalink

    Oh please change the headlines back to Iraq.

    I can’t stand seeing Obama and Clinton tear each other down with all these scandals.

  42. American Way
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 8:55 am | Permalink

    “he’s considered man enough to vote and fight and possibly die for his country..but not old enough to drink a beer?”

    Wow, this is a blast from the past conversation!
    I remember this discussion back in 1974-1975 time frame? When was it they lowered the voting age to 18, to gain more votes for one party?

    Off your topic, but I think that’s when it originally came up. Nation went 18, duly noted the huge increase in traffic deaths caused by drunk 18 year olds, and subsequently went back to 21.

    And from this, we still have the scurge of NEAR Beer, inflicted upon this great nation.

  43. BucKCorvus
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 8:56 am | Permalink

    Heres a good piece on Bush by the Times, its 4 years old though.

  44. BucKCorvus
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 8:57 am | Permalink

    lol, help if I posted it.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/17/magazine/17BUSH.html

  45. Komrade
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 8:57 am | Permalink

    “I am for a tax to pay for this war. That would help keep it in the public’s attention and would also end it shortly.”

    ———–

    Newsflash for Steven.

    Your taxes ARE paying for this war.

  46. Ken
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 8:57 am | Permalink

    “Every time there is a soldier fatality, the media carries it so if anyone misses it, it is their own inattentiveness.

    Maybe they realize we are losing soldiers at a much reduced rate or maybe they realize that a much greater number of people die in the US from traffic accidents.”

    It is rarely front page news now, the Beagle more often than not has put most news of the Iraq war onn page 6 / 7, and have periodically stooped to news of even Kansas soldiers death in section B. It has been the policy of this administration to keep as much of the war off the front page.

    But the Beagle is not alone — it’s a major contributing reason to most people being apathetic toward the war. I’ve said it here often before — the only people fighting this war are the soldiers and their families — most every one else is profiting from it —-

  47. American Way
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 9:03 am | Permalink

    “Did anyone see this editorial about Iraq and oil?”

    I think we should just be honest about waging a war for oil. Afterall, Americans love the big cars which consume lot’s of oil. They’d be willing to have their children die for that. It was the WMD thing which got Bush into trouble.

    Personally, I’d consider Venzuela for a more permanent solution. If we invade South America, we have a shorter supply line. Although I’m not certain of their proven oil reserves. Besides, most of America will be speaking Spanish in a couple of years. We won’t have any language barriers to overcome. Plus we all eat taco’s.

    Like Japan attacked the US when we cut off their oil supplies, we will go to war if we are cut off.

    I have no doubt about that. Now, if you all would get off your but-s and buy hybrid cars, we could all help avoid that day. But unless we cut our personal consumption – we are going to war again.

  48. Political_mama
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 9:04 am | Permalink

    Reg, Got,

    Everyone dies, no I don’t find it tragic that elderly people die, I find that normal. You’ll die of something someday.

    When it is tragic is when it happens and need not. Especially in young people, children, people starting their lives.

    100% of people will die of something someday.
    Oh my god!

    So you can’t compare elderly deaths to war deaths. Not even the same.

    Car accidents, that’s the risk you take. Is anyone here willing to give up their car because they may be killed someday in a car accident? Didn’t think so.

    As you properly pointed out, behavior has a LOT to do with that statistic as well.

  49. Komrade
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 9:06 am | Permalink

    “Like Japan attacked the US when we cut off their oil supplies, we will go to war if we are cut off.”

    —————-

    Well, since we weren’t “cut off” what’s your next theory?

  50. Ken
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 9:06 am | Permalink

    Now, if you all would get off your but-s and buy hybrid cars, we could all help avoid that day.

    they cant make em fast or cheap enough and now we wont be able to get loans — know a bank in China I can borrow from ?

  51. Max
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 9:08 am | Permalink

    Anyone remember the Embargo of 1974?

  52. Steven Davis
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 9:08 am | Permalink

    “Newsflash for Steven.

    “Your taxes ARE paying for this war.”

    Newsflash for Kommie: Your grand children’s credit card is paying for this war – courtesy of that fine lending institution – the bank of China.

  53. Komrade
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 9:09 am | Permalink

    “Car accidents, that’s the risk you take. Is anyone here willing to give up their car because they may be killed someday in a car accident? Didn’t think so.”

    ——————–

    If that’s true, why would anyone oppose the war when the death toll in our soldiers lives is much fewer than those from accidents and the war ensures our oil to run our cars?

    Didn’t you just make the point that lives killed for car transportation is a good thing?

  54. Max
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 9:11 am | Permalink

    Oops, 1973 Oil Embargo.

    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/42/Oil_Prices_1861_2006.jpg

    The 1973 oil crisis began on October 17, 1973, when the members of Organization of Arab Petroleum Exporting Countries (OAPEC, consisting of the Arab members of OPEC plus Egypt and Syria) announced, as a result of the ongoing Yom Kippur War, that they would no longer ship oil to nations that had supported Israel in its conflict with Syria and Egypt (the United States, its allies in Western Europe, and Japan).

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1973_oil_crisis

  55. Just the Facts
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 9:12 am | Permalink

    “(CNSNews.com) – American soldiers died in higher numbers during some of the peace-time years in the 1980s than in recent years when the military has fought conflicts in both Iraq and Afghanistan, according to a government report on casualty rates.

    Further, the number of annual U.S. military deaths for the last three years is just slightly above the average annual death toll in the 1990s.

    The study measures the death toll for every American war and also measures the total death toll per year from 1980 – when 2,392 military personnel died of various non-combat related causes – through 2006, when 1,858 soldiers died in both combat- and non-combat-related action combined.

    Also in 1980, there were 1,156 accidental deaths in the military, compared to 465 in 2006; 174 military personnel were murdered in 1980, compared to 30 murdered in 2006; and there were 231 suicides in 1980 compared to 155 in 2006.

    The number of military suicides, though much-reported in the media recently, is lower than in the 1980s or early 1990s. Since 1996, the number of military suicides per year has been below 200, according to the CRS….”

  56. American Way
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 9:17 am | Permalink

    Komrade, put down the latest issue of Soviet Life, and re-read my post. It’s all future tense.

  57. Max
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 9:21 am | Permalink

    Prophet of Doom: Islam’s Terrorist Dogma in M’s Own Words

    http://www.prophetofdoom.net/OPEC_History.Islam

  58. Max
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 9:24 am | Permalink

    The 1973 Oil Embargo led to a price increase of 600% in one year.

    If that happened this year, we would see $600/bbl oil by Christmas.

    Can you say $18/gal for gasoline?

    No reason to go to war for that!

    http://www.prophetofdoom.net/OPEC_History.Islam

    Islamic Crude 1974: The Islamic oil embargo, where oil had been used as a weapon of war by Muslims against the United States, ended with prices soaring to $14.00/barrel. It represented an increase of 600% in four years. The selling price now exceeded the extraction cost by 50 times. During this period, the Saudis are particularly aggressive in increasing tax rates and royalties.

    In January, Kuwait announced a 60 percent “government participation in,” actually emir confiscation of, the BP-Gulf concession. The Islamic emir of Qatar followed his example on February 20.

  59. Ben
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 9:25 am | Permalink

    The MSM actively helped the Bush Administration sell this war. Therefore they are just a bit embarassed with the coverage; how can they cover the fiasco without admitting their role as cheerleaders and boosters of the war?

  60. Komrade
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 9:26 am | Permalink

    “Komrade, put down the latest issue of Soviet Life, and re-read my post. It’s all future tense.”

    ——————

    Hey, I don’t have your magazine. Maybe you left it somewhere else?

  61. Max
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 9:26 am | Permalink

    “Say Dad, can I have money for gas? I have a date.”

    “Sure son, is it on empty again?”

    “Yup.”

    “Fine, here’s $360, that should fill it up, most of the way. Oh, and here’s $20 to buy a gallon of milk on the way home”

  62. ghotiphaze
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 9:28 am | Permalink

    Only it would have been with nuclear weapons and Iraq would now be a sea of glass.

    Once again, showing your logic. We’re in Iraq for the oil and you want to make it unusable for 5000 years????

  63. ghotiphaze
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 9:29 am | Permalink

    Oh please change the headlines back to Iraq.

    I can’t stand seeing Obama and Clinton tear each other down with all these scandals

    scroll back to Regular’s allegations.

  64. Max
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 9:31 am | Permalink

    I’d like to see everyone just cut their oil use in half – immediately.

  65. Komrade
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 9:32 am | Permalink

    “Once again, showing your logic. We’re in Iraq for the oil and you want to make it unusable for 5000 years????”
    —————–

    You missed the point. I was responding to someone who wanted the draft reinstated. I, myself, support the ground war – not a nuclear war that would occur if our politicians wanted to keep their children from being harmed.

  66. ghotiphaze
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 9:36 am | Permalink

    American soldiers died in higher numbers during some of the peace-time years in the 1980s

    If I remember a’right, check the numbers for 85 and 86. Already been posted several weeks ago. Still doesn’t make what’s going on NOW right.

  67. ghotiphaze
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 9:37 am | Permalink

    put down the latest issue of Soviet Life….

    LOL, I know Amway. I’d suggest he take notes, but he can’t follow the ones he has in front of him.

  68. ghotiphaze
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 9:39 am | Permalink

    The 1973 Oil Embargo led to a price increase of 600% in one year

    gee max, that made gas, what?, 75 cents a gallon? Remember the days of gas wars when the four corner gas stations were dropping their prices daily until it was 14-15 cents a gallon?

  69. ghotiphaze
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 9:42 am | Permalink

    You missed the point. I was responding to someone who wanted the draft reinstated

    No, scroll back. You were stating that if politicians and the rich had to actually fight, they’d just nuke ‘em.

  70. Max
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 9:45 am | Permalink

    How many murders in Washington DC in the last 5 years? (You know how safe it is there, they ban all guns!)

    2003 249
    2004 198
    2005 195
    2006 169
    2007 181

    Total = 992 Murders in 5 years

    http://bjsdata.ojp.usdoj.gov/dataonline/Search/Crime/State/RunCrimeStatebyState.cfm

    http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5hCTDCtVBhc2ugiMV6sP_bPJKdG2QD8VDDHT81

  71. ghotiphaze
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 9:46 am | Permalink

    The effects of the embargo were immediate. OPEC forced the oil companies to increase payments drastically. The price of oil quadrupled by 1974 to nearly US$12 per barrel

    the shock produced chaos in the West. In the United States, the retail price of a gallon of gasoline rose from a national average of 38.5 cents in May 1973 to 55.1 cents in June 1974. Meanwhile, New York Stock Exchange shares lost $97 billion in value in six weeks

  72. ghotiphaze
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 9:47 am | Permalink

    How many murders in Washington DC in the last 5 years? (You know how safe it is there, they ban all guns!)

    Maybe they should outlaw broken bottles?

    Can you imagine if everyone like you had guns in that town?

  73. Steven Davis
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 9:47 am | Permalink

    **********
    Rep. John P. Murtha (D-Pa.), a leading critic of the war and chairman of the House Appropriations Defense panel, was equally blunt, saying he had urged the Defense Department to be more upfront in the 2009 budget request.

    “They want to hide the cost of the war. We figure it’s costing $343 million a day in Iraq. And it’s all borrowed money.”
    **********
    http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0108/8080.html

  74. Max
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 9:53 am | Permalink

    If everyone in DC was REQUIRED to have a gun in their homes, perhaps crime would drop as it did in Kennesaw, GA:

    http://www.gunowners.org/fs0404.htm

    * Kennesaw, GA. In 1982, this suburb of Atlanta passed a law requiring heads of households to keep at least one firearm in the house. The residential burglary rate subsequently dropped 89% in Kennesaw, compared to the modest 10.4% drop in Georgia as a whole.37

  75. ghotiphaze
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 9:57 am | Permalink

    Max, my guess is every home (in the lower social sections) already has a plethora of guns. Hand guns, assault rifles, grenade launchers, bazookas, mortars. Y’know, kinda like your bedroom.

  76. ghotiphaze
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 10:01 am | Permalink

    Actually, Max, I kinda agree with you, and have used the GA stats myself a time or two. And with just a touch of reseach you can find better stats. The country of switzerland is a good example. I’m pro gun ownership. I just feel you’re waaa-aaaayyyy too rabid about the whole thing. People like you scare the b’jeebers outta me.

  77. Nathan
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 10:04 am | Permalink

    Iraq war coverage went MIA because the deaths and attacks were going down.

    And now that there is some increase…

    What do you know? They are back in the news!

    The media is so bankrupt of any new ideas or integrity in reporting it is sad.

  78. Max
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 10:10 am | Permalink

    How can that be Ghoti? They are against the law!

  79. American Way
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 10:10 am | Permalink

    Nathan,

    Is it true that with some slight modifications, an AR15 can be modified to fully automatic with the addition of an automatic sear?

    Max,

    Do you know where I can get a flash suppressor
    for my 106? I keep it behind the drapes in my bedroom. But I’m afraid to use it as the flash will wake up the ole lady.

  80. ghotiphaze
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 10:11 am | Permalink

    They are against the law!

    remove tongue from cheek.

  81. ghotiphaze
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 10:12 am | Permalink

    You have a 106? Cool, can I shoot it this 4th of July?

  82. American Way
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 10:16 am | Permalink

    Sure I do! You reminded me of it with your post on
    “Y’know, kinda like your bedroom.” :)

    Doesn’t everyone?

  83. ghotiphaze
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 10:18 am | Permalink

    LOL, no. I’m for gun ownership, doesn’t mean I have any (at home).

    Heck AmWay, I’m a lapsed jarhead–we don’t need no stinkin’ guns.

  84. Max
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 10:20 am | Permalink

    Number of Murders in Kansas vs DC. Note, in 2006 the population of KS was 2,764,075 or nearly FIVE TIMES higher then DC’s 581,530.

    Yet DC had almost twice as many murders.

    Murder rate in 2006 per 100,000 people:
    Kansas = 4.6
    DC = 29.1

    …..DC……Kansas
    2003 249…..125
    2004 198…..122
    2005 195…..102
    2006 169…..127
    TOTL 811…..476

    2007 181…..na

    http://bjsdata.ojp.usdoj.gov/dataonline/Search/Crime/State/RunCrimeStatebyState.cfm

  85. Nathan
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 10:22 am | Permalink

    American Way,

    Yes, it would be rather “easy” (If you have some tools and knowledge on weapons) to modify an AR-15 type rifle to be fully automatic.

    I will not go into the description on how to do something which is illegal on a public blog. Sorry.

  86. ghotiphaze
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 10:23 am | Permalink

    Max, factor in the poverty rate of each area. You might also consider the drug traffic in each area (though one could also argue the drugs are cause/effect (kinda circuitous at this point LOL) of the poverty rate)

  87. Max
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 10:24 am | Permalink

    The 106 is 155 mm, if I recall AmWay.

    The flash suppressors would make that too dangerous for the public, so they are not legally available.

    If you shoot in the daytime, no problem. I always wear my sunglasses when I shoot at night.

  88. J M Walker
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 10:26 am | Permalink

    Wanna end a lot of the gas shock? Europe has a 40mpg auto rating and is increasing it to 49. Japan has a 45 mpg rating for their auto makers.

    Funny how this country attacked California over their upping the mpg to 25.

    O, I forgot: the beltway is owned by the oil companies. They couldn’t handle 45 mpg on the nations highways. It would mean a drop in record profits.

    With 45 mpg, we wouldn’t need to convert food to fuel, and waste millions of gallons of water in doing so. Nor would we be feeding money to terrorist states. Yep, we’re doing all we can to stop terrorism, ain’t we.

  89. Max
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 10:28 am | Permalink

    Now Ghoti you want to debate the causes of crime.

    If 3 men invade your house, do you really care why?

    Guns are the deterrent. One solution, not THE solution.

    There are of course many other factors causing crime, and the Sociologists, and Psychologists, and Pathologists will debate those other causes to the end of time, without coming up with any solution other then what has already been tried. That is – free handouts do nothing to free people from poverty. And paying money to someone in exchange for them not committing crimes is extortion.

  90. Posted March 17, 2008 at 10:29 am | Permalink

    4,000 dead Americans because of bad reactions to all the pollen from the flowers the grateful Iraqis bestowed upon the people. Sure the occupation only cost $300 billion but I think we could spend a tiny bit more to buy face masks to help those who have allergies to flowers.

  91. Max
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 10:30 am | Permalink

    JM, what’s your car’s MPG?

  92. ghotiphaze
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 10:30 am | Permalink

    Break into my house, Max. I have no gun.

  93. Door King
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 10:32 am | Permalink

    I suppose that was no big deal either Reg?

    Put into perspective, the deaths at the world trade center or in the Oklahoma Muir building bombing, or at Whacko, were not big deals. If we’d stop with this crap that all human life is precious, we could make rational decisions when tragedy strikes. Every life has a price, and we almost always act as if it does. Thousands of lives could be saved in hopitals, for example, if we would put bar codes on all drugs; but we don’t because such an action costs money. It’s time we realized once an for all the truth. A average human life isn’t worth spit. Simply put, how can something there are so many of be worth anything?

    The money spent in Iraq, and the ruin of the dollar will have a much longer lasting effect on the people who continue to live, than the deaths of 4000 in Iraq.

  94. J M Walker
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 10:33 am | Permalink

    Why, am I cutting into your profits:-)

  95. Max
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 10:34 am | Permalink

    No thanks Ghoti. No matter how poor I am, I’m not breaking into houses to steal stuff from other people.

    Whether you defend yourself with a gun is your choice.

  96. Max
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 10:34 am | Permalink

    Do as I say, not as I do.

  97. ghotiphaze
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 10:34 am | Permalink

    You’re cutting into mine, JM, but hey, I don’t care, yu do what ya gotta do.

  98. Max
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 10:35 am | Permalink

    I’m willing to have others make sacrifices, that I’m not willing to make myself.

  99. Nathan
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 10:36 am | Permalink

    Max,

    Exactly. If all the liberals and Democrats would drive the cars they demand the average be made to match….

    Then the makers would supply more of them because there is a demand and we would be conserving more because more people are driving cars with better MPG.

  100. Nathan
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 10:40 am | Permalink

    ghotiphaze,

    Would you try to defend your life at all if someone was trying to take it?

    What about the lives of your family members?

  101. ghotiphaze
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 10:42 am | Permalink

    sure, nate. Doesn’t mean I have to carry a gun.

    Y’know, running around like Pancho Villa doesn’t make you Kal-El.

  102. Nathan
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 10:48 am | Permalink

    ghotiphaze,

    No, you don’t have to carry a gun.

    It just happens to be one of the better ways of defending yourself in most situations the more safe way.

  103. American Way
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 10:48 am | Permalink

    “Then the makers would supply more of them because there is a demand”

    There was a waiting list when I bought my Honda Hybrid. At the time, same was true for the Prius.

    Instead, in OUR nation, our automakers lobby congress to NOT increase CAFE standards which will ENSURE they can stay competitive – without providing Americans an energry efficient product.
    So Congress brags about passing new CAFE standards which don’t take effect for twelve years, and only provide for fleet “average” of 35 MPG.

    But many consumers have had enough. We are buying foreign cars which already excced 35 MPG (I get 44 MPG). And thanks to soaring gas prices, more Americans are thinking likewise.

    And the big three US automakers go tits up. Union jobs “poof” gone.

  104. ghotiphaze
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 10:51 am | Permalink

    in most situations the more safe way.

    the safest is to not get into those situations. That being impossible, the next safest is to get the hell out of there instead of trying to be a hero and possibly causing even more mayhem.

  105. ghotiphaze
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 10:53 am | Permalink

    Then the makers would supply more of them because there is a demand

    I agree, AmWay. Everyone knows it’s several years from concept to production. That’s the biggest reason the price is so high right now and waiting lists are long. Even after production of any new thing begins, depending on item, it dould be years before production reaches a peak.
    Figured Nate knew that and just threw it out to mess wid people’s head.

  106. American Way
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 10:54 am | Permalink

    Some of you might remember the old check in sheet.
    Had to go to the various places and have someone initial off that you have processed in.

    Sometimes, the 01′ office poogies would play games.
    “Hey, while you checking in to BAS (battalion aid station), tell Doc Jones, you are picking up my fallopian tubes.” or
    “Hey, while you are checking in to supply tell the Gunny I told you to pick up twenty grid squares.”
    or
    “Hey, when you check into the armory, will you tell Sgt Whited that I want my flash suppressor for my 106 back.”
    (Of course the armor, corpsman, and supply clerks were in on the deal.)

  107. ghotiphaze
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 10:54 am | Permalink

    And the big three US automakers go tits up. Union jobs “poof” gone

    I’m still ticked about Tucker and Willis companies!!!

  108. ghotiphaze
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 10:57 am | Permalink

    LOL, AmWay, I was once sent for 20 yards of flight line. I figured, OK, I’ll bite and I can kill an hour or so while I’m at it.
    Imagine my amazement when I sardonically asked the supply clerk for flight line and he went to a bin and came back with line, flight, braided, nylon, 100yds.

  109. Nathan
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 10:57 am | Permalink

    Ghotiphaze,

    No where was I specific enough to suggest that in any way I would purposefully place myself into bad situations or that I wouldn’t try to avoid making things worse by trying to be a hero.

    So why introduce such a strawman argument?

  110. ghotiphaze
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 10:58 am | Permalink

    So why introduce such a strawman argument?

    OK, we’re back to square one. I don’t need no stinkin’ gun.

  111. Phantom
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 11:06 am | Permalink

    Iraq is no Israel. If one person gets killed in Israel, it’s all over the news. If they were losing a 20th of the number in Iraq, it would be all over the media. Americans just don’t care if their Iraqi.
    Look at today, at least 25 blown up and you see statements from Cheney saying “we’re successful”, and McCain saying “Surge is working, surge is working…

  112. J R
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 11:08 am | Permalink

    It’s the “Larry Craig” effect.

    Or maybe we should call it the “American Idol” effect.

    Let something play out long enough, and the American public just forgets about it.

    And the handlers of george bush BANKED this occupation on it from the get go.

  113. American Way
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 11:14 am | Permalink

    “I was once sent for 20 yards of flight line”

    I guess if you didn’t “swing with the Wing”, you wouldn’t know that one.

  114. ghotiphaze
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 11:29 am | Permalink

    swing with the Wing

    flightline is the strip near the runway. Used for plane parking.

  115. Posted March 17, 2008 at 11:40 am | Permalink

    How about a box of grid squares?
    A can of squelch supressor?
    Muffler bearings?
    ID 10 T bolts?

  116. Posted March 17, 2008 at 11:42 am | Permalink

    “4,000 people die in falls every year in the U.S. as well. If you multiply that by five, that’s 20,000 people that have died in the U.S. since the start of the Iraq war.”

    Max follows it up with car fatalities.

    This is a perfect example of the logical fallacy called the “red herring.”

    If thousands of people die from falls, does that mean it’s okay for me to shoot Regular in his head with a .45?

    Obviously, the fact that many people die from accidental death does not justify putting other people into a f***ing war zone.

    Any one who dies for Bush’s elective war for oil dies in vain.

  117. Posted March 17, 2008 at 11:42 am | Permalink

    Riser grease?
    Have a troop shake a tree so you can watch for it moving on the map?
    Bolt stretcher?

  118. American Way
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 11:42 am | Permalink

    Grunts weren’t allowed on the flight line. Except of course, when the wingers needed someone for FOD
    sweeps. And occassionally during a static display when they needed more people for flightline security. Even when boarding or debarking helicopters, someone was always rushing you and keeping you in a straight line.

  119. ghotiphaze
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 11:44 am | Permalink

    Sol, I actually believe I saw a listing for bearings, muffler in a parts breakdown. Didn’t see the real product, but I was told it was for a quick fording conversion.

  120. ghotiphaze
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 11:45 am | Permalink

    HURRY UP and wait

  121. American Way
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 11:46 am | Permalink

    “Any one who dies for Bush’s elective war for oil dies in vain.”

    Pretty cold statement CapnAmerica. Not one I’d ever wish passed on the families of those who have went before us. If you go to some of the military websites and read what troops are saying – one or two of them BELIEVE in what they are doing.

  122. Posted March 17, 2008 at 11:46 am | Permalink

    BTW, the latest count shows 3,988 of America’s finest young people have died for absolutely nothing as of today.

    As of the 19th, the war will have been going on for five years.

    We spend about 2-2.5 billion a week in Iraq.

    “Mission Accomplished.”

  123. American Way
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 11:48 am | Permalink

    And is this a myth? They were always yelling at us to “keep your heads down!” because the rotors could chop your head off. Seems like the crew chief’s always boarded standing erect.

    Was this just another way of f–king with us?

  124. ghotiphaze
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 11:50 am | Permalink

    Who was that official that got the top of his head whacked by the chopper rotor?

    gotta google. the video gets shown every so often. Happened several years ago.

  125. Posted March 17, 2008 at 11:51 am | Permalink

    AmWay–

    The soldiers and their families are deserving of our highest praise and respect–they did their duty, and as Shakespeare writes in “Titus Andronicus” the dead “sleep in fame.”

    As for the cause for which they died, it was nothing more than George W. Bush’s desire to control Iraq’s oil.

    Saddam Hussein committed two unforgivable sins–he nationalized the oil fields instead of letting the richest multinationals in the world take the profit and he refused to sell to the US.

    Bush made Iraq safe for big capitalism to make money.

    “Mission Accomplished.”

  126. Posted March 17, 2008 at 11:55 am | Permalink

    We had a flight line too. Rotary wing air craft. The air force flies, the army beats the air into submission. HooooAHHHHHHH

  127. ghotiphaze
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 11:55 am | Permalink

    1982: Vic Morrow, actor, was decapitated by a helicopter blade during filming of Twilight Zone: The Movie, along with two child actors, Myca Dinh Le (decapitated) and Renee Shin-Yi Chen (crushed

    That wasn’t it, though.

    the one I’m thinking was some Turk, egyptian, or something along that line. Was wearing the military uniform.

  128. ghotiphaze
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 11:57 am | Permalink

    The air force flies, the army beats the air into submission

    I’ve known many ARMY airplane pilots (course they were WWII vets)

  129. Posted March 17, 2008 at 12:00 pm | Permalink

    They shot video of the rotors in flight. Trying to time an ejection seat for the old cobras. The blades were everywhere. Short of shooting the pilot through the floor board, there was no safe means to eject.

    So yeah, the rotors are pretty dangerous.

  130. ghotiphaze
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 12:07 pm | Permalink

    You tube has a clip of testing an early copter, it loses control, pilot ejected right into the blades.

    Still can’t find that mid-easterner getting his pate whacked, though LOL

  131. ghotiphaze
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 12:08 pm | Permalink

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ixDn8Ak4kz8

  132. Nathan
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 12:22 pm | Permalink

    American Way,

    There are plenty of different types of vehicles which get better MPG than what people end up buying.

    The simple truth is that if all those who were preaching on better MPG were out buying better MPG then they would drive the market instead of crying for government intervention.

  133. ghotiphaze
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 12:34 pm | Permalink

    I had a more economical vehicle than my pickup but the cost of littering from the road apples forced me to sell my horse.

    Nathan, some people just have to buy what is available in their price range. And when that’s a guzzler, you buy it or walk.

  134. ghotiphaze
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 12:37 pm | Permalink

    Besides, Nathan, I may have missed them, but I don’t think there were too many hybrid cars 15-20 years ago. that’s about the age of my ‘new’ cars.

  135. Hank Price
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 12:42 pm | Permalink

    ghotiphaze
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 12:34 pm | Permalink

    I had a more economical vehicle than my pickup but the cost of littering from the road apples forced me to sell my horse.

    LOL!!!

    A horse is economical? Wanna bet? Vet bills, farrier bills, hay, grain . . .

  136. Nathan
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 1:16 pm | Permalink

    Ghotiphaze,

    Why don’t you care about the environment or oil consumption enough to go out and buy something better?

  137. ghotiphaze
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 1:34 pm | Permalink

    Nathan, some people just have to buy what is available in their price range. And when that’s a guzzler, you buy it or walk.

  138. Ed Friedemann
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 1:43 pm | Permalink

    Badmouthing Obama seems to come easy for William Kristol in a column in the New York Times. It’s understandable that Kristol, being the architect of the Iraq war { The first stage of the PNAC plan } might be nervous about any changes in Bush’s Foreign Policy and how those changes might put even greater distance in the prospect of attacking Iran.

    It seems Obama is intelligent enough to see how much damage seven years of Bush’s policies have done to America and make the proper adjustments.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/17/opinion/17kristol.html?em&ex=1205899200&en=347b30be3443f3c8&ei=5087

  139. Nathan
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 1:44 pm | Permalink

    Ghotiphaze,

    You could be right. Some people simply are not in a place to purchase a better MPG vehicle.

    That is hardly the status quo or the norm for ALL those who are out there preaching about a government mandate for better MPG standards.

    My statement still stands.

  140. ghotiphaze
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 1:55 pm | Permalink

    maybe not status quo (whatever that means in this instance) but I bet by far the mode.

    Seriously, Nathan, do you truly believe a person who can go out at the drop of a hat and buy anything his heart desires is going to go out and buy a 20 year old gas guzzler/oil leaker instead of a hybrid getting, what? 55MPG simply because they can?
    I realize those with too much money have the “I don’t want anymore cake so I’ll spit in it so noone else can have any either” mentality, but sheesh, at least eat the cake first!

  141. Posted March 17, 2008 at 2:00 pm | Permalink

    Fish,
    Have you seen the new pony cars? 500 bhp or stay at home. This is what the better monied are buying. Even Caddy has their hat in the ring.

    Now there is the Tesla Roadster to consider…

  142. ghotiphaze
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 2:02 pm | Permalink

    Not a clue what you’re talking about, Sol LOL

    whadya expect from an ignoramus. (gotta go look up wot the snot bhp means, and what is stay at home?)

  143. ghotiphaze
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 2:03 pm | Permalink

    are you making fun of my horse/truck?

    heck for $5 at the rendering plant you have a vehicle. And the farmers pay you to fill it up as long as you drive their ditches.

  144. ghotiphaze
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 2:07 pm | Permalink

    Tesla made a roadster? I thought he just built coils, death rays, and heavy metal music.

  145. Nathan
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 2:11 pm | Permalink

    Ghotiphaze,

    I’ll tell you what I know. I know that the market forces drive what is produced.

    People have wanted, purchased, and driven SUV’s and Trucks with 20MPG for the last decade.

    The Democrats and Liberals keep talking about why we need better standards yet I bet half of them are out there driving those SUV’s and Trucks.

    It is simple. Put your money where your mouth is.

    If all of those people who purport to be caring about the environment actually went out and purchased and drove vehicles to back it up, they would change the market.

    Instead, you want big brother to force everyone to a standard you are unwilling to meet on your own.

  146. ghotiphaze
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 2:21 pm | Permalink

    Put your money where your mouth is

    my money is where my mouth is–I eat.

    Nathan, I’m not forcing anyone to do anything. If Detroit (or wherever else) produced a vehicle with the passenger room of my pickup (me, wife, 3 grandkids, and one child) and hauling capacity of the bed getting 45 MPG (and yu know they could) and sell it to me for the price of a 20 year old gas burner (ok, I’m asking too much), I”d jump in a second. And you can’t tell me that if they made a Winnebago that got 35 MPG you wouldn’t scrap your Hummer for something that’d take up the whole road.

    I’m saying people don’t buy them because companies don’t feel they have to make them. People have been bitching for hybrids for 30 years or so and the companies are just NOW getting off their keesters and doing something about it.

  147. Posted March 17, 2008 at 2:21 pm | Permalink

    One of the issues is that there are few high mileage vehicles to purchase in the United States.

    In the US, there are only three vehicles that you can buy that get better than 40 MPG – in Europe there are 60.

    Raising CAFE standards got the American car makers moving in the Seventies and Eighties. If CAFE standards were raised again, we would see a similar response.

    Remember, back in the very early Seventies, the US car makers were against unleaded fuels.

    We managed to survive that, we can deal with higher CAFE standards.

  148. ghotiphaze
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 2:24 pm | Permalink

    I had a B210 that was getting a tad over 40mpg depending on the wind, unless the odometer was off or the pump gauage. But, cripes, that thing was small.

  149. Nathan
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 2:41 pm | Permalink

    WS Clark,

    Even though, there are plenty of vehicles which all get much better MPG than an SUV, Truck, or high HP car.

    So why are you and all the others not out there buying them?

  150. ghotiphaze
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 2:49 pm | Permalink

    Actually, we do have a grand am that gets fair gas mileage, unfortunately it ride 4 reasonably comfortably (considering 2 of them are 12), and put the other child (18, 6′3, 220 lbs), and it’s like putting shaquille o’neal’s foot into a baby booty. the three car seats for grandbabies won’t even fit in the back seat without riding on each other. I tried to make the youngest ride on the front tire, but it screwed up my shocks. consequently, when any number of people are required to go somewhere, we take the truck. We also have a van that seats 8 that we use as a break-down vehicle (for when another breaks down), but right now it’s broke down.

  151. TDT
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 2:50 pm | Permalink

    Door King – Your post was so incredibly cynical, and yet, it was right on the money. Sad state of affairs that is.

  152. Max
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 3:01 pm | Permalink

    Ed Friedemann endorses Obama.

    What’s that tell ya?

  153. ghotiphaze
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 3:03 pm | Permalink

    Bush endorses McCain…that tell me alot!!!

  154. Max
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 3:06 pm | Permalink

    It’s sad that TDT liked Door Kings post.

    Says much about the Libs.

    Individual Rights of Freedom don’t matter. Whatever is best for The State is the correct path.

  155. Max
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 3:10 pm | Permalink

    HillaryCare! for example.

    Will provide some reduced form of health care coverage to everybody, many will get what they’ve long been looking for: Something for Nothing.

    Oh, you will get something allright:

    Those over age 65, little or no treatment – You Die! But that is what’s best for The State. It will save costs and free up limited resources for most people (who deserve to live).

    Doctors will retire in droves, and $50,000/yr salaries will attract few new doctors. Doctor shortages means waiting lines for treatment, and driving 100 miles to your nearest doctor. But that’s the cheapest way for The State to provide some health care.

    Not the best for individuals, but the best for The State. And you get what you pay for.

  156. ghotiphaze
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 3:10 pm | Permalink

    Sorry, Max, if it’s between the STATE and your pocket, the STATE wins in my book.

    I’m really curious, Max, how can you possibly contrive anything ‘communist’, or ’socialist’ out of anything in that post?

  157. ghotiphaze
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 3:13 pm | Permalink

    Door King
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 10:32 am | Permalink
    I suppose that was no big deal either Reg?

    Put into perspective, the deaths at the world trade center or in the Oklahoma Muir building bombing, or at Whacko, were not big deals. If we’d stop with this crap that all human life is precious, we could make rational decisions when tragedy strikes. Every life has a price, and we almost always act as if it does. Thousands of lives could be saved in hopitals, for example, if we would put bar codes on all drugs; but we don’t because such an action costs money. It’s time we realized once an for all the truth. A average human life isn’t worth spit. Simply put, how can something there are so many of be worth anything?

    The money spent in Iraq, and the ruin of the dollar will have a much longer lasting effect on the people who continue to live, than the deaths of 4000 in Iraq.

    I looked, looked, and looked, even used CTL+F, and I didn’t see anything about Hillycare in there.

  158. Max
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 3:38 pm | Permalink

    “It’s time we realized once an for all the truth. A average human life isn’t worth spit. Simply put, how can something there are so many of be worth anything?” DK

    To Libs, Individual Rights do NOT matter. One human life has no value.

    Hillary will do whatever is best for The State regardless of what individual rights are trampled.

    Of course you Libs don’t see that as a problem.

    Individual Freedom hasn’t been in the Democrat vocabulary since JFK.

  159. littlejohn
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 3:49 pm | Permalink

    “In the US, there are only three vehicles that you can buy that get better than 40 MPG – in Europe there are 60″

    No argument here. Just three questions.
    1) Do they meet American safety standards?
    2) Who makes them?
    3) Why are they not importing them to US market?

  160. Door King
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 3:57 pm | Permalink

    Don’t you believe in supply and demand, Max. Your lies aren’t worth spit either, as there are sooo many of them.

  161. Max
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 4:10 pm | Permalink

    It’s a direct quote from you DK.

    Don’t blame me for your words.

  162. Max
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 4:15 pm | Permalink

    IN HIS OWN WORDS:

    Door King
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 10:32 am | Permalink

    It’s time we realized once an for all the truth. A average human life isn’t worth spit. Simply put, how can something there are so many of be worth anything?

    The money spent in Iraq, and the ruin of the dollar will have a much longer lasting effect on the people who continue to live, than the deaths of 4000 in Iraq.

  163. Max
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 4:17 pm | Permalink

    The Socialist beggars are not concerned with the American lives lost in Iraq.

    They are mad because they wanted the money given to the Socialist deadbeats, instead of being spent in Iraq!

    It’s the money! And it’s not even their money if they don’t pay any taxes!

  164. Posted March 17, 2008 at 4:20 pm | Permalink

    JPMorgan today cashed a $200 Billion welfare check today. Damned socialists.

  165. LR
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 5:17 pm | Permalink

    Max
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 4:17 pm | Permalink
    The Socialist beggars are not concerned with the American lives lost in Iraq.

    They are mad because they wanted the money given to the Socialist deadbeats, instead of being spent in Iraq!

    It’s the money! And it’s not even their money if they don’t pay any taxes!

    stfu you are again delusional —- hey here’s an idea if we all pitch in and buy you a dog to replace your dog that was killed accidently by a black left wing socialist — will you give it a rest — and maybe a dog for the part time marine here too

  166. Rage
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 5:50 pm | Permalink

    You know, Regular’s bullshit “stats” rather remind me of this:

    Millions and Millions Dead!!!

    http://www.theonion.com/content/node/29456

  167. Mary Caruso
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 7:14 pm | Permalink

    “They are mad because they wanted the money given to the Socialist deadbeats, instead of being spent in Iraq!”

    Yes, I’d rather see my tax money go to the disabled, health care, better pay for teachers, more police protection, good roads, better schools, scientific research, etc than being wasted in Iraq. What the hell is wrong with that?

    Max, you are too weird for words.

  168. Rage
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 7:25 pm | Permalink

    http://action.credomobile.com/comics/2008/03/at_first_they_told_us_the_war.html

  169. Mary Caruso
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 7:28 pm | Permalink

    Good one Rage!

  170. Billy Bob
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 7:32 pm | Permalink

    Yah mahn, if tha monay hadn’t gone to tha war, it would have gon to tha socialist commie pigs to fight against freedom. Just ask billary, cause thay wants yous monay, cause thays knows hows to spends yar moneys bettar than yous knows hows to spends yous monay.

  171. Posted March 17, 2008 at 8:36 pm | Permalink

    Gee, billy bob, if you talk the way you type, you could easily qualify for a Customer Service Tech, working out of your very own office cubicle in Delhi, India!! LOL

  172. lindainks55
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 8:39 pm | Permalink

    Suppose he makes people feel some kind of pride? Yeah, man, that’s the person who will convince someone!

  173. J R
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 8:46 pm | Permalink

    DO click Rage’s link.

    Ya know what is really stupid?

    We have all the liabilities of an empire and none of the advantages.

  174. Posted March 17, 2008 at 8:53 pm | Permalink

    “So why are you and all the others not out there buying them?”

    And just how do you know that we don’t, Price?

  175. Posted March 17, 2008 at 9:01 pm | Permalink

    “They are mad because they wanted the money given to the Socialist deadbeats, instead of being spent in Iraq!”

    And what have we gained by the misadventure in Iraq?

    What has our investment returned?

  176. J R
    Posted March 17, 2008 at 9:09 pm | Permalink

    Well Halliburton and Blackwater are doing pretty good.

    From Rage’s link…

    It is estimated that the final cost? (Assuming the occupation of Iraq EVER ends) will be …

    3 TRILLION dollars.

    If you taped one dollar bills end to end, 3 Trillion of them would reach the Moon and back.

    600 times.

  177. Posted March 17, 2008 at 10:21 pm | Permalink

    To get back on track with the thread (like J R is trying to do, thank you J R)–

    My most recent issue of The Nation says that the average pay of a private in combat is 25,942.

    26 grand is what we pay guys to put their lives on the line.

    The average CEO pay of the top 30 military contractors however is 9 million dollars a year. The CEO of Lockheed Martin who never looks down the wrong end of a rifle barrel makes 24 million a year.

  178. Posted March 17, 2008 at 10:28 pm | Permalink

    LR perpetuates the myth that no one pays taxes except for the rich and income taxes are the only taxes that matter.

    My wife and I just bought a bedroom set and the tax cost over 150 dollars.

    Apparently, LR believes that the poor don’t pay taxes on food, gas, electricity, car tags and telephones.

    His idiotic comment also ignores the question of how the rich earn money if the poor aren’t working for them.

  179. Posted March 17, 2008 at 11:52 pm | Permalink

    We know that Iraq and al Qaeda have had high-level contacts that go back a decade. Some al Qaeda leaders who fled Afghanistan went to Iraq. These include one very senior al Qaeda leader who received medical treatment in Baghdad this year, and who has been associated with planning for chemical and biological attacks. We’ve learned that Iraq has trained al Qaeda members in bomb-making and poisons and deadly gases. And we know that after September the 11th, Saddam Hussein’s regime gleefully celebrated the terrorist attacks on America.” — George W. Bush, October 7, 2002

    “There’s no question that Saddam Hussein had al-Qaeda ties.” — George W. Bush, September 17, 2003

    Vice President Dick Cheney said Thursday the evidence is “overwhelming” that al Qaeda had a relationship with Saddam Hussein’s regime in Iraq, and he said media reports suggesting that the 9/11 commission has reached a contradictory conclusion were “irresponsible.” “There clearly was a relationship. It’s been testified to. The evidence is overwhelming,” Cheney said in an interview with CNBC’s “Capitol Report.” — CNN, June 19, 2004

    ******

    The Pentagon’s latest report showed “no relationship” between Al Qaeda and Saddam.

  180. TDT
    Posted March 18, 2008 at 10:16 am | Permalink

    Max – As usual, your lack of reading comprehension leads you to an incorrect assumption. I in now way said I liked DK’s post. However, all you have to do is look at the paper, listen to the candidates campaigning, and you simply come to the conclusion that Americans are worried about their pocket books, not the death toll in Iraq. I mean, isn’t that what all these posts and this article are about? Geez, some people’s kids.

16 Trackbacks

  1. By Loren Baker on April 3, 2008 at 11:15 pm

    Loren Baker…

    The Citroen DS article offers a pictorial illustration of US-model vs. Banks are thus compensator’s of money flows in space. One of…

  2. By Jack on April 4, 2008 at 6:59 am

    Jack…

    To all the uninitiated out there – read this and take heed. This is good stuff. Thanks….

  3. By Eric on April 4, 2008 at 10:46 am

    Eric…

    Ok, I’m not in complete agreement with this, but I see your point. Thanks for sharing….

  4. By Jun Atwood Cruso on April 4, 2008 at 12:02 pm

    Jun Atwood Cruso…

    Very nice article. You can have more info about this at: http://www.alcoholtreatmentonline.info/alcohol-withdrawal-treatment.html…

  5. By Jessie on April 4, 2008 at 1:16 pm

    Jessie…

    Ok, I’m not in complete agreement with this, but I see your point. Thanks for sharing….

  6. By Eric on April 4, 2008 at 10:09 pm

    Eric…

    Thanks, this is good stuff. You are spot on….

  7. By Jessie on April 5, 2008 at 6:16 am

    Jessie…

    Truer word have never been uttered, indeed. Your point is sound and excellent. Thanks for sharing….

  8. By Eric on April 5, 2008 at 7:36 am

    Eric…

    Thanks for sharing. I agree and would add that th…

  9. By Jessie on April 5, 2008 at 1:19 pm

    Jessie…

    Thanks for the info. By the way, I am a big fan of your site. Keep up the great work….

  10. By Retire In Israel on April 5, 2008 at 2:36 pm

    Retire In Israel…

    Thanks for this post!…

  11. By Natasha Yi Nude on April 5, 2008 at 11:38 pm

    Natasha Yi Nude…

    Thanks for the nice read, keep up the interesting posts…..

  12. By Party Planning How To Display Food on April 6, 2008 at 1:40 am

    Party Planning How To Display Food…

    Six Apart started a working group in February 2006 to improve the Trackback protocol with the goal to eventually have it approved as…

  13. By Eric on April 8, 2008 at 12:29 am

    Eric…

    Man, your mind fascinates me. Thanks again for sharing….

  14. By Jessie on April 8, 2008 at 10:00 am

    Jessie…

    To all the uninitiated out there – read this and take heed. This is good stuff. Thanks….

  15. By Work From Home With No Upfront Investment on April 8, 2008 at 10:15 am

    Work From Home With No Upfront Investment…

    Please keep these excellent posts coming….

  16. By Jessie on April 9, 2008 at 6:26 pm

    Jessie…

    Thanks for sharing. I agree and would add that th…