Shows what you know, it’s Medal of Honor software.

I remember they tried this a couple years ago with one woman who told absolute insane stories. The lies were uncovered and she faded into obscurity but she was paid by OR at the time to tell her lies. I wouldn’t be surprised that they’d be willing to try it again.

They are currently seeking to speak with those who have had late-term abortions. I distinctly remember what I believed, even as a teenager – all those years ago, moments before having my first trimmester abortion.

As such, I’d be downright hypocritical if I disdained the pain of women – be they post-abortive, non-abortive, or neutral on this issue.

Finally, it is an unavoidable facet of life that some people are more skilled at religious fellowship than others. And some, (i.e., Randall Terry et. al.) are particularly maladroit.

I don’t think OR would wish to speak with me. I did not have a late-term procedure; I am not interesting in castigating my own abortionist; I am not interested in criticizing or judging other women; at this stage of my life, I’m certainly casting a critical eye on my own idiocy of the past. I can’t be sure, but I don’t think a born-again Christian would wish to hear about such things. It wouldn’t be couth.

But healing and alleviation are timeless virtues. I can’t discriminate here. I won’t discriminate here. It hurts my heart very much to see women in pain; it elicits my respect to hear of post-abortive individuals achieving healing and happiness.

I suspect that many who write here, would rather NOT KNOW if the law is followed. They just want fewer little rugrats to support on taxpayer money. Taxes are a separate issue which also need addressing.

That being the case it is sad to actually read the words of the jurors. They ‘feel’ things should be done differently? Maybe there should be a test to be on a grand jury. Question #1: Do you think or feel your way through life?

I think back to the Al Capone income tax-evasion case as, perhaps, the watershed of government targeting an individual and desparately looking for a crime somewhere.

Of course Capone committed his share of crimes. And finally nabbing him on a technicality probably served justice. But damn.

Anyone could become a target of the government’s unlimited resources and could be accused of just about anything under the Grand Jury system. It really is true, that thing about “…indict a ham sandwich,” given the leeway prosecutors are given in a grand jury. When there’s *no* indictment; that’s *news!*

That’s evidence as to just how lame Phill (the second L is for “litigator”) Kline’s case against Planned Parenthood really was.

And consider what jury pay is these days. This particular Grand Jury convened in December. Fifteen people were taken from their jobs and careers and paid what? $10 a day? All the way through March and for what?! Nothing. Phill (the second L is for “lame”) Kline had *nothing!*

As a resident of a sparsely-populated county in Kansas, I could gin up Grand Jury hearings against, say, “Nathan,” with a few dozen signatures. It wouldn’t be justice. I (most likely) wouldn’t be justified. But it would be legal under current law.

Witness the Kenneth Starr witch hunt against Bill Clinton.

They started with Whitewater – found nothing there – and continued until they tripped him up with the Paula Jones – Monica Lewinsky fiasco.

Imagine if a Grand Jury/Special Prosecutor investigated George W Bush with an unlimited budget and unlimited resources.

Eh?

Can’t think of a better way, especially in small communities to break up a GOBN. :)

Churches circulating petitions to influence legislation and use grand jurys to harass nonbelievers.

Payments by lobbyists to buy legislation allowing certain coal companies to sell power to Colorado and leave the pollution in Kansas.

Conflict of interest by legislatures regarding legislators opposing casinos because it would take business from their own bingo parlors, or because they were being paid by existing casinos to oppose any competition.

Business interests who contribute to local campaigns in exchange for contracts to build unneeded and poorly located arenas at taxpayer expense.

I’m sure we could find even more if we had a grand jury investigate everything, so it can determine what needs to be investigated! Sign Here!

Rhonda, why don’t you call Lance Kinzer and ask him if he’ll support changing the law on calling forth a grand jury.

Rest assured, since ole Zigfried SAID they must contact opposition to such a law proposal, everyone should get contacted..

Why not investigate why Zigfried is saying that ops need to be contacted before a hearing in Congress, but then fails to do it when it’s the side he opposes.

Rhonda, why don’t you call Lance Kinzer and ask him if he’ll support changing the law on calling forth a grand jury.

Rest assured, since ole Zigfried SAID they must contact opposition to such a law proposal, everyone should get contacted..

Why not investigate why Zigfried is saying that ops need to be contacted before a hearing in Congress, but then fails to do it when it’s the side he opposes.