According to the latest rankings of the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics, the median net worth of members of Congress for 2006 was $1.7 million for U.S. senators and $675,000 for House members. Sen. Sam Brownback, R-Kan., was the only Kansan to crack the top 25 in either chamber, coming in as the 17th richest senator with a minimum net worth of just over $10 million. The richest member of either chamber was said to be Rep. Jane Harman, D-Calif., whose wealth was estimated at $409 million in 2006. And House members saw their net worth rise an average 84 percent from 2004 to 2006. Can a Congress whose members have $3.6 billion between them really write laws for a nation in an economic slowdown?
Registered?
Commenting on WE Blog now requires you to be a Kansas.com member. Use the links above to register, if you haven't already, or to log in.Contact us
Follow us
Daily Archives
-
Recent Comments
- writerdog on Minority status in Senate; majority approval at home
- Politico on Health care reform would save state money
- Phantom on Open thread 11/22
- Phantom on Health care reform would save state money
- Phantom on Health care reform would save state money
- Phantom on Health care reform would save state money
- writerdog on Health care reform would save state money
- Phantom on Health care reform would save state money
- Monkeyhawk on Open thread 11/22
- Phantom on Minority status in Senate; majority approval at home

16 Comments
Everything the Federal Reserve has done so far has been to prop up the stock market. The stock market is a negligible percentage of the u.s. economy, but the repository of almost all wealth. Each cut in interest rates translates into a rise in inflation that wipes out any good it does, as 90 percent of this economy is consumer driven. You can cut the rate when the dollar is strong, but it is suicide when the dollar is weak. The dollar is weak because of Bush Tax Cuts, the deficit and the unfunded war. Just try to explain that to a 70-year-old grocery clerk in Dreayville who think Hillary Clinton is a criminal due to 16 years of Limbaugh lies. We’re forking doomed.
I have said that there is the problem in this country, there is no real definition of “broke” in this country.
Two men meet on the street, one is use to having twenty dollars in his pocket. The other is use to having a thousand dollars in his pocket. The suggestion is made of going to lunch, the man whom normally has $20 is down to $5 and the man whom is use to a $1,000.00 is down to a $100. When the first man said he is broke and can not afford to eat at the restaurant. The second man thinks the first is just being cheap as he would say he is broke too. But he can afford the restaurant, though the first would think the second is rich for having a hundred dollars in his pocket. Neither man can relate to the other as they both put their own thought of the term broke on their companion.
I once worked for a man who could not understand when I said I could not afford to spend $600.00 dollars on one suit. As he worn suits that cost him over a $1,000.00 a piece, he was paying my wages and should have been better aware of my situation then most. But to him he was average and everyone should be able to afford such suits.
There is a valid point to this article, it often depends on the circle you run in as to how you can think of others. The poor man can not truly understand what it is like to be rich and the rich man can not begin to think of as to how he would survive being poor. LOL after the aforementioned boss of mine and I parted ways. I got a phone call from him several months later, he had lost the business and everything he owned. He call to ask me, “how do you survive being poor?”.
Sic em Hillary, they are making too much money. Take their largesses and profits away, raise their taxes and finally have term limits.
Look at that, 7 of the top 10 richest b*stards in Congress are Democrats!
The filthy rich claiming to represent the poor! BS!
(Avg Net Worth)
1
Jane Harman (D-Calif)
$409,426,887
2
Darrell Issa (R-Calif)
$337,440,028
3
John Kerry (D-Mass)
$267,789,805
4
Vernon Buchanan (R-Fla)
$191,695,634
5
Herb Kohl (D-Wis)
$171,423,011
6
Edward M. Kennedy (D-Mass)
$102,822,519
7
Jay Rockefeller (D-WVa)
$91,713,012
8
Robin Hayes (R-NC)
$82,552,081
9
Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif)
$79,555,657
10
Frank R. Lautenberg (D-NJ)
$79,051,090
The filthy rich Dems can be found here:
http://www.opensecrets.org/pfds/overview.php
Sarah
You sound like a complete crack pot.
Has Obama said that we should NOT cut interest rates?
Has Hillary said that we should NOT cut interest rates?
Besides, the Fed is, pretty much, an independent body anyway. What difference would partisan politics make?
“The stock market is a negligible percentage of the u.s. economy, but the repository of almost all wealth.” HUH?
The above statement is really weird, unless you are suggesting that we should have some kind of a Communist “war on wealth” —
Sarah, is there any other cure for poverty, other than wealth?
Every pension fund in America holds corporate stocks.
There is NO economy without the stock market.
At least, not unless you want to go back to the barter system or start hearding sheep and goats.
I will grant you that most jobs are created by small businesses.
However, those small businesses depend on people with pensions, who depend on the stock market.
Those small businesses depend on the employees of corporations, who depend on the stock market.
Your, “us against them” class warfare crap sounds like Karl Marx!
By the way, liberals:
Most of the wealth, held by members of Congress, is held by DEMOCRATS, not Republicans.
And Sarah
Actually
REAL ESTATE is the repository of a great deal of wealth in this country.
A large portion of stock market value represents the property held by corporations, so we must be careful not to count this “wealth” twice, but — since a home remains that largest investment that most individuals hold —
It is entirely likely that most “wealth” is land and improvements on that land, tangible real property. Add homes to agricultural, commercial and utility real estate?
I do not think anyone has done the math, recently, but real estate is usually a pretty heavy player, as far as comparitive repositories of wealth are concerned.
The members of Congress can simply vote themselves another huge pay raise. Free health care, free lunches, free skyboxes at sporting events and an extra $4,000 a year.
Nice post at 9:53 Econ. You concisely summarized the Liberal agenda.
Class War on Wealth. The Karl Marx solution is being continued by Clinton/Obama.
From each according to their abilities to each according to their need.
And, to at least some degree, I agree with Paul today. MANY of us who are ‘middle-income’ have our retirement tied to the markets via our IRA/401Ks.
“Most of the wealth, held by members of Congress, is held by DEMOCRATS, not Republicans.”
That’s because Democrats are better at economic issues.
That’s because Democrats are better at economic issues.
I thought the point they were trying to make is the rich democrats are willing to help the poor while all the dirt po’ republicans wanna hoard. Isn’t that the way you read it?
Sunday March 16, 10:00 pm ET
http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/080316/jpmorgan_bear_stearns.html
By Joe Bel Bruno and Madlen Read, AP Business Writers
JPMorgan Says It Will Buy Ailing Bear Stearns for Fire-Sale $2 a Share, or $236.2 Million
NEW YORK (AP) — Just four days after Bear Stearns Chief Executive Alan Schwartz assured Wall Street that his company was not in trouble, he was forced on Sunday to sell the investment bank to competitor JPMorgan Chase for a bargain-basement price of $2 a share, or $236.2 million.
The stunning last-minute buyout was aimed at averting a Bear Stearns bankruptcy and a spreading crisis of confidence in the global financial system sparked by the collapse in the subprime mortgage market. Bear Stearns was the most exposed to risky bets on the loans; it is now the first major bank to be undone by that market’s collapse.
The Federal Reserve and the U.S. government swiftly approved the all-stock buyout, showing the urgency of completing the deal before world markets opened. The Fed also essentially made the takeover risk-free by saying it would guarantee up to $30 billion of the troubled mortgage and other assets that got the nation’s fifth-largest investment bank into trouble.
“This is going to go down in very historic terms,” said Peter Dunay, chief investment strategist for New York-based Meridian Equity Partners. “This is about credit being overextended, and how bad it is for major financial institutions and for individuals. This is why we’re probably heading into a recession.”
JPMorgan Chase & Co. said it will guarantee all business — such as trading and investment banking — until Bear Stearns’ shareholders approve the deal, which is expected to be completed during the second quarter. The acquisition includes Bear Stearns’ midtown Manhattan headquarters.
JPMorgan Chief Financial Officer Michael Cavanaugh did not say what would happen to Bear Stearns’ 14,000 employees worldwide or whether the 85-year-old Bear Stearns name would live on after surviving the Great Depression, two World Wars and a slew of recessions. He told analysts and investors on a conference call that JPMorgan was most interested in buying Bear Stearns’ prime brokerage business, which completes trades for big investors such as hedge funds.
At almost the same time as the deal for control of Bear Stearns was announced, the Federal Reserve said it approved a cut in its lending rate to banks to 3.25 percent from 3.50 percent and created another lending facility for big investment banks. The central bank’s official meeting is on Tuesday. Before the emergency move to lower the discount rate, which is the rate at which banks lend each other money, the Fed was widely expected to again cut its headline rate by as much as a full point to 2 percent.
“Having taking Bear Stearns out of the problem category, and the strong action by the Federal Reserve, we would anticipate the market will behave quite differently on Monday than it was Thursday or Friday,” Cavanaugh said.
Some analysts expected it to be a brutal day for global stocks, nevertheless. Shortly after the news broke, Japan’s benchmark Nikkei stock index plunged more than 3 percent in morning trading.
A bankruptcy protection filing of Bear Stearns could have heightened anxiety in world financial markets amid a deepening credit crunch. So far, global banks have written down some $200 billion worth of securities slammed amid the credit crisis — more write-downs could come. Last week, a bond fund controlled by private equity firm Carlyle Group faltered near collapse because of investments linked to mortgage-backed securities.
JPMorgan’s acquisition of Bear Stearns represents roughly 1 percent of what the investment bank was worth just 16 days ago. It marked a 93.3 percent discount to Bear Stearns’ market capitalization as of Friday, and roughly a 98.8 percent discount to its book value as of Feb. 29.
“The past week has been an incredibly difficult time for Bear Stearns,” Schwartz said in a statement. “This represents the best outcome for all of our constituencies based upon the current circumstances.”
Wall Street analysts say the bid to rescue Bear Stearns was more than just saving one of the world’s largest investments banks — it was a prop for the U.S. economy and the global financial system. An outright failure would cause huge losses for banks, hedge funds and other investors to which Bear Stearns is connected.
After days of denials that it had liquidity problems, Bear was forced into a JPMorgan-led, government-backed bailout on Friday. The arrangement, the first of its kind since the 1930s, resulted in Bear getting a 28-day loan from JPMorgan with the government’s guarantee that JPMorgan would not suffer any losses on the deal.
This is not the first time Bear Stearns has earned a place in Wall Street history. A decade ago, Bear Stearns refused to help bail out a hedge fund that was deemed “too big to fail.” On Friday, the tables had turned, with the now-struggling investment bank in need of the same kind of aid.
Bear Stearns was founded in 1923 and in recent years was best known for its aggressive investing in mortgage-backed securities — and what was once a cash cow turned into the investment bank’s undoing.
In June, two Bear-managed hedge funds worth billions of dollars collapsed. The funds were heavily invested in securities backed by subprime mortgages. Until that point, subprime mortgage-backed securities were immensely popular with investors because of their profitability.
The funds’ demise and subsequent problems in the credit markets called into question Bear Stearns’ ability to manage its own risk and the leadership ability of then-Chief Executive James Cayne. Critics of the company said Cayne spent too much time away from the office last year playing golf and bridge as the problems unfolded.
Cayne is the same executive who refused to let Bear Stearns provide support as part of a Federal Reserve-led plan to rescue Long-Term Capital Management in 1998. His reticence was said to deeply anger some of his fellow Wall Street CEOs, and the episode came up every time Bear was reported to be in trouble in recent months.
Cayne took over from the legendary Alan “Ace” Greenberg in 1993. Greenberg joined Bear Stearns as a clerk, working his way up through the ranks to eventually take over as CEO in 1978. Greenberg was known for his irreverent style, and his regular memos to employees were turned into a book called “Memos from the Chairman.”
Before Greenberg’s ascendancy to CEO, Bear Stearns began to expand from its New York roots throughout the 1950s and 1960s, opening international offices and expanding its U.S. operations.
AP Business Writers Jeannine Aversa in Washington and Stephen Bernard contributed to this story.
I’ve made this point before, that there are a lot of people out there that do not understand the pinch that middle and lower income households are feeling. My own father doesn’t get it, but he’s been Limbaughdomized (?), is retired, and has a nice retirement income. I tried to explain to him what was going on outside his little world, but he doesn’t want to hear it. My guess that a small family (4) making over $125,000 in a Kansas type economy doesn’t feel the pinch. Maybe that’s too high, or maybe too low, but I know my boss and his wife bring in about $200,000 year, he just bought a new Lexus, and golfs every weekend. He’s definitely not feeling it.
“Congress whose members have $3.6 billion between them really write laws for a nation in an economic slowdown?
The answer of course is yes – they’ve been doing it for years. Their spending habits of other peoples money is contributing to the dollars decline in value.
The “game” both parties play is to keep us all rooting for a “team”. As long as we remain divided between two teams, they can point fingers and blame the other team.
When in private, their team colors come off when they socialize, drink the best scotch, and caviar.
Look at that, 7 of the top 10 richest b*stards in Congress are Democrats!
The filthy rich claiming to represent the poor! BS!
8 Trackbacks
[...] The train will be used primarily by civilian emergency responders such as …www.saljournal.comCongress may not feel recessionCongress may not feel recession Posted4 hours and 5 minutes ago According to the latest rankings of [...]
Mortgage Brokerage…
Here is a quote I like, “I have noticed that the people who wait…
Investment Banks…
Found your blog on yahoo – thanks for the article but i still don’t get it….
Bankruptcy Laws And Mortgages…
These new low rates are killing me, I wish my credit wasn’t messed up so I could lock in the low rates….
after bankruptcy mortgage second…
…
Jessie…
Thought provoking post. Very interesting items and have enjoyed immensely. Please visit my site also….
Mortgage Interest Tables…
I have to say, that I could not agree with you in 100%, but it’s just my opinion, which could be wrong….
10 year interest only mortgage…
Didn’t realise there was this type of information out there…