Comments on: Actually, abortion issue is more like opera

By: Max

Max — Mon, 03 Mar 2008 18:33:48 +0000

Abortion is like an opera afterall.

Sing it now everybody!

Money for nothin and your abortions for free

By: Doug

Doug — Mon, 03 Mar 2008 18:32:22 +0000

rfl,
You forgot gays.

By: Political_mama

Political_mama — Mon, 03 Mar 2008 18:31:50 +0000

Ksgrm there is a law being proposed that will expand the Alexa’s law (UVVA, unborn victims of violence act) to the mother who carries the child and participates in behavior dangerous to the fetus. Look it up.

By: rfl

rfl — Mon, 03 Mar 2008 18:31:14 +0000

Guns, God and babies. Anything else get neo-cons in more of an uproar?
-Clark

Add to that:

Economic Freedom
Strong National Defense
Maintaining a Law Abiding society
Equal Human rights for all People
Private Property
Religious Freedom

By: Max

Max — Mon, 03 Mar 2008 18:31:05 +0000

Liberal Theme Song: Money for Nothin

Money for nothin and your abortions for free
Money for nothin and healthcare for free
Money for nothin and _____________________

By: Nathan

Nathan — Mon, 03 Mar 2008 18:24:54 +0000

Doug,

You could probably have a better conversation with yourself in notepad if all you are going to do is make up strawman arguments to beat down.

I would not execute women for having an abortion.

I have not called all women who get an abortion murderers either.

By: Econ101

Econ101 — Mon, 03 Mar 2008 18:22:01 +0000

Actually, the Supreme Court was very much responsible for the Civil War.
It was the Supreme Court that did not respect “States Rights” or the 10th Amendment, but not in the way many would have you think!

The Dred Scott decision and the various “Fugitive Slave Acts” actually attacked the rights of “Free Soil” or anti-slavery states.

Slavery was, indeed, a terrible thing.

It was the pro-slavery people who FIRST ignored the 10th Amendment and “States Rights”.

By: Doug

Doug — Mon, 03 Mar 2008 18:21:41 +0000

No Nathan, you said that women who get abortions are murdering children. What do you do with murderers Nathan? You’d have every woman executed for having an abortion. That’s your religious way of dealing with things (also your religious would have them executed for getting raped but I don’t expect you to actually know anything about your religion you ignorant twit).

Is it your absolute incompetence that gets you to forget something you posted a minute ago or is it the dishonest nature of your fundamentalist ideology that allows you to lie so easily?

By: Max

Max — Mon, 03 Mar 2008 18:21:39 +0000

Maybe they meant Oprah.

By: American Way

American Way — Mon, 03 Mar 2008 18:20:33 +0000

Damn Max! That is the word “opera”? I thought it was short for “operation”.

An opera is a hill billy dance.
It comes in three sizes, I think.

Small
Medium
and Grandiose (or Grand old later Grand Ole)

By: Nathan

Nathan — Mon, 03 Mar 2008 18:18:55 +0000

Doug,

I have NEVER said that no woman should get an abortion.

By: Max

Max — Mon, 03 Mar 2008 18:18:41 +0000

The Libs get vile and nasty when they don’t get the welfare they want.

When Big Brother Government doesn’t allow them to steal from others, they act like their rights have been violated.

Funny, I get mad when my stuff gets stolen.

Libs get mad when they can’t steal stuff.

They need us. We don’t need them.

By: American Way

American Way — Mon, 03 Mar 2008 18:17:34 +0000

O.K. boys and girls. Go to your seats.

Mr. Nathan has an opinion on this subject which is different than most of yours – so gang up and beat him up? Call him names?

Stop it! Or else you will be left with no one right to argue with. (get it)

Grow up and respect others opinions (even if they are wrong).

By: Doug

Doug — Mon, 03 Mar 2008 18:17:22 +0000

Nathan, your stupidity knows no bounds. You have stated that no woman should get an abortion, I say a patient and the doctor should decide yet you conclude your stupid conclusion. You are beyond ignorant. It’s amazing you are able to dress yourself in the morning.

By: Nathan

Nathan — Mon, 03 Mar 2008 18:15:32 +0000

Doug,

No. It is you who would like to dictate who should get medical treatment and what treatment that should be.

Not me.

By: WSClark

WSClark — Mon, 03 Mar 2008 18:14:39 +0000

“Pervert News”

Foley. Haggard. Craig. Burton. Hyde. Chenoweth. Gingrich.

The list goes on and on and on.

By: Nathan

Nathan — Mon, 03 Mar 2008 18:14:20 +0000

Doug,

I suppose asking you if you understood the difference in causation and correlation would be too much?

By: Doug

Doug — Mon, 03 Mar 2008 18:12:48 +0000

Thank you Dr. Nathan for another ignorant statement. How nice of you to determine who should get medical treatment and what sort of treatment they should get.

By: Nathan

Nathan — Mon, 03 Mar 2008 18:12:25 +0000

WS Clark,

Well, lets see some more of this extensive and extremely quick wit of yours around the blog, instead of your typical vulgarity and name calling.

By: Max

Max — Mon, 03 Mar 2008 18:11:49 +0000

Actually, the abortion issue is like the abortion issue.

But the Liberal Press would rather elevate the right to abortion up to the level of the Bill of Rights.

As for the real Bill of Rights, the liberal press would just as soon burn it. Things like the Right to Bear Arms, and Equal Protection Under the Law, and the Protection of Private Property from Public Condemnation for Private Use – and the Redistribution of Wealth, all take a back seat to Abortion.

Fusion Power Generation could be perfected and the Lib Press would have that on page B10. (And the Environmentalist Global Warming Nuts would have a big problem with cheap, clean, Fusion power)

Abortion, Welfare, Socialism, Gun Control, Sex Scandals, Pervert News, Higher Taxes, Bigger Government programs are always on page 1. Tabloid Journalism.

And the Conservatives need to quit following the agenda of the Lib Press, or they will be on Defense forever.

Screw the press, nobody reads news rags anymore anyway. They need Blogs to generate readership and revenue, because they can’t write anything interesting on their own.

Abortion is like Opera? Who the hell watches Opera?

By: Doug

Doug — Mon, 03 Mar 2008 18:11:25 +0000

Funny thing how the rates of abortion are lower in the more secular, godless countries and higher in the religious countries. If you want to reduce the number of abortion then reduce the amount of religion. Yet for some reason the anti-abortion terrorist groups are always religious. I suppose actually stopping abortion would reduce their paychecks.

By: Nathan

Nathan — Mon, 03 Mar 2008 18:10:41 +0000

Doug,

Restricitin abortion in an attempt to save the unborn child is not even close to being as intrusive as a government ran and mandated health care system.

Talk about government intrusion!

By: WSClark

WSClark — Mon, 03 Mar 2008 18:09:51 +0000

“Think much before you type something, WS Clark?”

I wouldn’t need to swear to kick your miserable behind in Dozens, Price. My vocabulary is quite extensive and my wit is extremely quick. You would be on the losing end before the first round.

“However, the “least” of my brothers and sisters, today, happen to still be in the womb.”

Then support comprehensive sex ed – not abstinence only and the availability of birth control.

Wasn’t it the Republicans that wanted (LD medicine) and not birth control to be covered by Medicaid?

By: Doug

Doug — Mon, 03 Mar 2008 18:07:53 +0000

No surprise here, Republicans support a bigger, more intrusive government. They’ll be more than happy to give subsidies for companies to produce drugs like Accutane but restrict access to abortion to deal with the effects of the drug.

By: Econ101

Econ101 — Mon, 03 Mar 2008 18:02:07 +0000

WS
I would agree with you, in part.

However, the “least” of my brothers and sisters, today, happen to still be in the womb.