<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Strategy to Sebelius message?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/02/strategy-to-sebelius-message/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/02/strategy-to-sebelius-message/</link>
	<description>The Wichita Eagle Editorial Department Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:23:49 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mrbill</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/02/strategy-to-sebelius-message/#comment-286589</link>
		<dc:creator>mrbill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 07:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/02/strategy-to-sebelius-message/#comment-286589</guid>
		<description>At least the Brits have started implementing the measures needed to run a Universal medical system right.   

If you join in you are automatically signed up as an organ donor.  No choices to make.

They have stopped treating obese and smokers.  If you are overweight they no longer give care to those who are either overweight or smoke.   If you do bad things to yourself, you are therefore both responsible and fuc**d.  

Are looking at not giving you care if you are speeding and have a wreck.   If you get hurt they can tell you were speeding, you just lay and die.

At least a universal system that I think finally fits the Fascist Left. 

Control of all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least the Brits have started implementing the measures needed to run a Universal medical system right.   </p>
<p>If you join in you are automatically signed up as an organ donor.  No choices to make.</p>
<p>They have stopped treating obese and smokers.  If you are overweight they no longer give care to those who are either overweight or smoke.   If you do bad things to yourself, you are therefore both responsible and fuc**d.  </p>
<p>Are looking at not giving you care if you are speeding and have a wreck.   If you get hurt they can tell you were speeding, you just lay and die.</p>
<p>At least a universal system that I think finally fits the Fascist Left. </p>
<p>Control of all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CapnAmerica</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/02/strategy-to-sebelius-message/#comment-286330</link>
		<dc:creator>CapnAmerica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 19:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/02/strategy-to-sebelius-message/#comment-286330</guid>
		<description>George--

Remember that when you&#039;re living on Social Security and Medicare.

Dumbass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George&#8211;</p>
<p>Remember that when you&#8217;re living on Social Security and Medicare.</p>
<p>Dumbass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CapnAmerica</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/02/strategy-to-sebelius-message/#comment-286329</link>
		<dc:creator>CapnAmerica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 19:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/02/strategy-to-sebelius-message/#comment-286329</guid>
		<description>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/01/AR2008020102621.html?hpid%3Dopinionsbox1&amp;sub=AR

Forty-seven years ago, my grandfather Dwight D. Eisenhower bid farewell to a nation he had served for more than five decades. In his televised address, Ike famously coined the term &quot;military-industrial complex,&quot; and he offered advice that is still relevant today. &quot;As we peer into society&#039;s future,&quot; he said, we &quot;must avoid the impulse to live only for today, plundering, for our own ease and convenience, the precious resources of tomorrow. We cannot mortgage the material assets of our grandchildren without risking the loss also of their political and spiritual heritage. We want democracy to survive for all generations to come, not to become the insolvent phantom of tomorrow.&quot;

Today we are engaged in a debate about these very issues. Deep in America&#039;s heart, I believe, is the nagging fear that our best years as a nation may be over. We are disliked overseas and feel insecure at home. We watch as our federal budget hemorrhages red ink and our civil liberties are eroded. Crises in energy, health care and education threaten our way of life and our ability to compete internationally. There are also the issues of a costly, unpopular war; a long-neglected infrastructure; and an aging and increasingly needy population.

I am not alone in worrying that my generation will fail to do what my grandfather&#039;s did so well: Leave America a better, stronger place than the one it found.

Given the magnitude of these issues and the cost of addressing them, our next president must be able to bring about a sense of national unity and change. As we no longer have the financial resources to address all these problems comprehensively and simultaneously, setting priorities will be essential. With hard work, much can be done.

The biggest barrier to rolling up our sleeves and preparing for a better future is our own apathy, fear or immobility. We have been living in a zero-sum political environment where all heads have been lowered to avert being lopped off by angry, noisy extremists. I am convinced that Barack Obama is the one presidential candidate today who can encourage ordinary Americans to stand straight again; he is a man who can salve our national wounds and both inspire and pursue genuine bipartisan cooperation. Just as important, Obama can assure the world and Americans that this great nation&#039;s impulses are still free, open, fair and broad-minded.

(More at link)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/01/AR2008020102621.html?hpid%3Dopinionsbox1&amp;sub=AR" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/01/AR2008020102621.html?hpid%3Dopinionsbox1&amp;sub=AR</a></p>
<p>Forty-seven years ago, my grandfather Dwight D. Eisenhower bid farewell to a nation he had served for more than five decades. In his televised address, Ike famously coined the term &#8220;military-industrial complex,&#8221; and he offered advice that is still relevant today. &#8220;As we peer into society&#8217;s future,&#8221; he said, we &#8220;must avoid the impulse to live only for today, plundering, for our own ease and convenience, the precious resources of tomorrow. We cannot mortgage the material assets of our grandchildren without risking the loss also of their political and spiritual heritage. We want democracy to survive for all generations to come, not to become the insolvent phantom of tomorrow.&#8221;</p>
<p>Today we are engaged in a debate about these very issues. Deep in America&#8217;s heart, I believe, is the nagging fear that our best years as a nation may be over. We are disliked overseas and feel insecure at home. We watch as our federal budget hemorrhages red ink and our civil liberties are eroded. Crises in energy, health care and education threaten our way of life and our ability to compete internationally. There are also the issues of a costly, unpopular war; a long-neglected infrastructure; and an aging and increasingly needy population.</p>
<p>I am not alone in worrying that my generation will fail to do what my grandfather&#8217;s did so well: Leave America a better, stronger place than the one it found.</p>
<p>Given the magnitude of these issues and the cost of addressing them, our next president must be able to bring about a sense of national unity and change. As we no longer have the financial resources to address all these problems comprehensively and simultaneously, setting priorities will be essential. With hard work, much can be done.</p>
<p>The biggest barrier to rolling up our sleeves and preparing for a better future is our own apathy, fear or immobility. We have been living in a zero-sum political environment where all heads have been lowered to avert being lopped off by angry, noisy extremists. I am convinced that Barack Obama is the one presidential candidate today who can encourage ordinary Americans to stand straight again; he is a man who can salve our national wounds and both inspire and pursue genuine bipartisan cooperation. Just as important, Obama can assure the world and Americans that this great nation&#8217;s impulses are still free, open, fair and broad-minded.</p>
<p>(More at link)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CapnAmerica</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/02/strategy-to-sebelius-message/#comment-286327</link>
		<dc:creator>CapnAmerica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 19:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/02/strategy-to-sebelius-message/#comment-286327</guid>
		<description>Anyone who supports Bush has chipped away at Constitutional rights more than any time in our history.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone who supports Bush has chipped away at Constitutional rights more than any time in our history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: george</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/02/strategy-to-sebelius-message/#comment-286282</link>
		<dc:creator>george</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 14:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/02/strategy-to-sebelius-message/#comment-286282</guid>
		<description>What change would you want; more social programs to pay for and increase on the others. Changes or reform statements by politicians just mean more regulations and taxes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What change would you want; more social programs to pay for and increase on the others. Changes or reform statements by politicians just mean more regulations and taxes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lindainks55</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/02/strategy-to-sebelius-message/#comment-286279</link>
		<dc:creator>lindainks55</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 14:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/02/strategy-to-sebelius-message/#comment-286279</guid>
		<description>You are right!  Thanks for the much-needed corrections!  I get carried away easily in my distrust, anger, obsession with all things bushco.  No thinking straight when you hold such deeply negative emotions.  But just because he deserves every feeling I hold I sure shouldn&#039;t give those in Congress a pass for laying down and being his stepping stone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are right!  Thanks for the much-needed corrections!  I get carried away easily in my distrust, anger, obsession with all things bushco.  No thinking straight when you hold such deeply negative emotions.  But just because he deserves every feeling I hold I sure shouldn&#8217;t give those in Congress a pass for laying down and being his stepping stone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Writerdog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/02/strategy-to-sebelius-message/#comment-286278</link>
		<dc:creator>Writerdog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 14:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/02/strategy-to-sebelius-message/#comment-286278</guid>
		<description>Glad to hear Regular, well that two of us!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to hear Regular, well that two of us!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Regular</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/02/strategy-to-sebelius-message/#comment-286277</link>
		<dc:creator>Regular</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 14:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/02/strategy-to-sebelius-message/#comment-286277</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll protect the Constitution Dog. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll protect the Constitution Dog. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Writerdog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/02/strategy-to-sebelius-message/#comment-286276</link>
		<dc:creator>Writerdog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 14:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/02/strategy-to-sebelius-message/#comment-286276</guid>
		<description>Linda just how have they slowed Bush down? It is plain his attention is not on the country but Iraq.
How have they slowed him down where it really counts to Bush? Every bill concerning Iraq has been passed exactly how Bush had wanted it, Bush is willing to hold up bills that are stated to be needed to protect the country from terrorism because they are not exactly how he wants them. The argument they can not get anything done because they do not have a 60 vote majority is a straw man argument. True it take a majority to pass a bill, but it also takes a majority to fail one too. They have that and yet pass everything Bush wants and more. 

Some bills it is in the public good to pass and not take a stand, but other would be worth the outcry to hold up and hostage for the public good. We are going to end up having the Federal government being allowed to eavesdrop and search without a warrant and at will in violation of the Constitution. Why because the majority party will not take a stand for the American people! When neither party is protecting the Constitution who will?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Linda just how have they slowed Bush down? It is plain his attention is not on the country but Iraq.<br />
How have they slowed him down where it really counts to Bush? Every bill concerning Iraq has been passed exactly how Bush had wanted it, Bush is willing to hold up bills that are stated to be needed to protect the country from terrorism because they are not exactly how he wants them. The argument they can not get anything done because they do not have a 60 vote majority is a straw man argument. True it take a majority to pass a bill, but it also takes a majority to fail one too. They have that and yet pass everything Bush wants and more. </p>
<p>Some bills it is in the public good to pass and not take a stand, but other would be worth the outcry to hold up and hostage for the public good. We are going to end up having the Federal government being allowed to eavesdrop and search without a warrant and at will in violation of the Constitution. Why because the majority party will not take a stand for the American people! When neither party is protecting the Constitution who will?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lindainks55</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/02/strategy-to-sebelius-message/#comment-286273</link>
		<dc:creator>lindainks55</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 14:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/02/strategy-to-sebelius-message/#comment-286273</guid>
		<description>&quot;...has not produced enough of the promised results in the public mind.&quot;
--------------------------
This isn&#039;t JUST in the public mind -- IT IS REALITY!  They HAVE NOT produced enough of the promised results!

But they&#039;ve put the Republicans who had forgotten to pretend to do their jobs on notice.  Haven&#039;t you noticed the increased attention?  The mailers, the calls announcing the town-hall phone meetings, the letters to the editor have all increased.  Brownback has remained asleep at the wheel, but both Roberts and Tiahrt have suddenly remembered there is a constituency, elections are held...

The new slim Democratic majority in the House has slowed bushco down.  There was NO accountability in the first six years of his administration!

The elections this fall will firm up the majority and there won&#039;t be the total roadblock idiot in the White House any longer.  That will be the real test!  If they don&#039;t shape up their terms of office should be short-lived!  Keep them accountable to WE THE PEOPLE and UNelect more quickly so they understand who the boss is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;has not produced enough of the promised results in the public mind.&#8221;<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
This isn&#8217;t JUST in the public mind &#8212; IT IS REALITY!  They HAVE NOT produced enough of the promised results!</p>
<p>But they&#8217;ve put the Republicans who had forgotten to pretend to do their jobs on notice.  Haven&#8217;t you noticed the increased attention?  The mailers, the calls announcing the town-hall phone meetings, the letters to the editor have all increased.  Brownback has remained asleep at the wheel, but both Roberts and Tiahrt have suddenly remembered there is a constituency, elections are held&#8230;</p>
<p>The new slim Democratic majority in the House has slowed bushco down.  There was NO accountability in the first six years of his administration!</p>
<p>The elections this fall will firm up the majority and there won&#8217;t be the total roadblock idiot in the White House any longer.  That will be the real test!  If they don&#8217;t shape up their terms of office should be short-lived!  Keep them accountable to WE THE PEOPLE and UNelect more quickly so they understand who the boss is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Writerdog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/02/strategy-to-sebelius-message/#comment-286239</link>
		<dc:creator>Writerdog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 12:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/02/strategy-to-sebelius-message/#comment-286239</guid>
		<description>In a more days gone by I might have agreed with the  summation of it is party politics, the contest was checks and balances.
Both fighting to a compromise then agreeing on what is best. But today is seems more a death match, the goal is not to simply fight till there is a victor. BUT until the enemy is dead and the triumph can stand with their foot on top of the body. There is no wish to compromise but to enslave the defeated, the goal is no longer what is best for the country but what is best for the ideology, the party is all that matters and the welfare of the people by and large is all but forgotten. It is no longer a competition of ideals as to which way the country should go or head. But whom shall have the right to stand with a foot on the defeat’s throat. 
This does not serve the nation, it only serves those who in the end have stood aside and it not mattering to them who the victor is. When your neighbor and you are having a fist fight in the front yard, the thief can have the easier time entering both of your houses through the back door. In that it would serve those not caring whom is the victor to encourage and promote the continuation of the Partisanship.
There are many forces at work today within the United States, the greater enemy is not the one outside the walls but the one who is within. But the partisan bickering is a distraction from the enemy within, how well would it work if when the fortress is under serge the soldiers defending the fortress are fighting amongst themselves?

I think that the founding fathers would have not approved of this today, they realized the value of discord when it is in the name of the common good. When the goal of that discord would be to farther the frame work of this nation. But today we tear away the frame work to have a weapon to beat the opponent over the head and to kill the other side. The fight maybe the same but the goals have changed for the worst.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a more days gone by I might have agreed with the  summation of it is party politics, the contest was checks and balances.<br />
Both fighting to a compromise then agreeing on what is best. But today is seems more a death match, the goal is not to simply fight till there is a victor. BUT until the enemy is dead and the triumph can stand with their foot on top of the body. There is no wish to compromise but to enslave the defeated, the goal is no longer what is best for the country but what is best for the ideology, the party is all that matters and the welfare of the people by and large is all but forgotten. It is no longer a competition of ideals as to which way the country should go or head. But whom shall have the right to stand with a foot on the defeat’s throat.<br />
This does not serve the nation, it only serves those who in the end have stood aside and it not mattering to them who the victor is. When your neighbor and you are having a fist fight in the front yard, the thief can have the easier time entering both of your houses through the back door. In that it would serve those not caring whom is the victor to encourage and promote the continuation of the Partisanship.<br />
There are many forces at work today within the United States, the greater enemy is not the one outside the walls but the one who is within. But the partisan bickering is a distraction from the enemy within, how well would it work if when the fortress is under serge the soldiers defending the fortress are fighting amongst themselves?</p>
<p>I think that the founding fathers would have not approved of this today, they realized the value of discord when it is in the name of the common good. When the goal of that discord would be to farther the frame work of this nation. But today we tear away the frame work to have a weapon to beat the opponent over the head and to kill the other side. The fight maybe the same but the goals have changed for the worst.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kelly</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/02/strategy-to-sebelius-message/#comment-286237</link>
		<dc:creator>kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 12:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/02/strategy-to-sebelius-message/#comment-286237</guid>
		<description>I agree that the change in congressional leadership has not produced enough of the promised results, but I do not agree that fault for this situation belongs to Reid and Pelosi.  Many long overdue, important changes in law have been accomplished.

1. Increasing the minimum wage by over 40% when the last increase goes into effect in July 2009 ($5.15 to $7.25).  Any increase at all was stonewalled for over 10 years by the Republicans&#039; control of Congress.

2. Implementation of all of the recommendations of the bipartisan 9/11 Commission (what possible justification was there NOT to do so).

3.  Increasing Pell grant funding for college tuition loans, and reducing the interest rate for repayment.  

4.  Raising mandatory minimun fuel efficiency standards for autos.  Isn&#039;t it a no brainer that Detroit has possessed this ability for years, and that the easiest way to reduce our dependence on foreign oil is to BURN LESS OF IT?

4.  Securing the biggest overhaul of ethics and lobbying rules since Watergate.  Sen. Obama had a great deal of responsibility for accomplishing these changes.

5.  More money for math and science teachers who earn more credentials in their field.

6.  Doubling of money for basic scientific research.

7.  Reclamation projects for hurricane-devasted Gulf Coast.

Read the Washington Post National Weekly Edition for more information, 12-24-07 through 1-6-08 edition.

In order to be even more successful, we need more Democrats in Congress in order to accomplish the limitation of the President&#039;s power to wage war and spend, to increase coverage for families seeking health insurance for children, or to pass a more targeted and efficient economic stimulation bill.  Reid and Pelosi, Dennis Moore and Nancy Boyda cannot be faulted for voting the right way, but not having enough similarly commited colleagues in Congress to defeat Senate filibusters by Republican dinosaurs like Brownback and Roberts, et al.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that the change in congressional leadership has not produced enough of the promised results, but I do not agree that fault for this situation belongs to Reid and Pelosi.  Many long overdue, important changes in law have been accomplished.</p>
<p>1. Increasing the minimum wage by over 40% when the last increase goes into effect in July 2009 ($5.15 to $7.25).  Any increase at all was stonewalled for over 10 years by the Republicans&#8217; control of Congress.</p>
<p>2. Implementation of all of the recommendations of the bipartisan 9/11 Commission (what possible justification was there NOT to do so).</p>
<p>3.  Increasing Pell grant funding for college tuition loans, and reducing the interest rate for repayment.  </p>
<p>4.  Raising mandatory minimun fuel efficiency standards for autos.  Isn&#8217;t it a no brainer that Detroit has possessed this ability for years, and that the easiest way to reduce our dependence on foreign oil is to BURN LESS OF IT?</p>
<p>4.  Securing the biggest overhaul of ethics and lobbying rules since Watergate.  Sen. Obama had a great deal of responsibility for accomplishing these changes.</p>
<p>5.  More money for math and science teachers who earn more credentials in their field.</p>
<p>6.  Doubling of money for basic scientific research.</p>
<p>7.  Reclamation projects for hurricane-devasted Gulf Coast.</p>
<p>Read the Washington Post National Weekly Edition for more information, 12-24-07 through 1-6-08 edition.</p>
<p>In order to be even more successful, we need more Democrats in Congress in order to accomplish the limitation of the President&#8217;s power to wage war and spend, to increase coverage for families seeking health insurance for children, or to pass a more targeted and efficient economic stimulation bill.  Reid and Pelosi, Dennis Moore and Nancy Boyda cannot be faulted for voting the right way, but not having enough similarly commited colleagues in Congress to defeat Senate filibusters by Republican dinosaurs like Brownback and Roberts, et al.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
