Open thread 2/1

thread

530 Comments

  1. The Phantom
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 6:40 am | Permalink

    Looks like bush is getting real progress in Iraq. Another EEO in Baghdad.
    http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080131/wl_nm/iraq_dc_1

  2. The Phantom
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 6:42 am | Permalink

    BE interesting to know if these are Saudi women sneaking into Iraq, or Iraq citizens blowing themselves up.

  3. The Phantom
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 6:44 am | Permalink

    At least the Senate is trying to spread the money around to the people that need it most. Don’t envy Roberts if he is an obstructionist preventing the Seniors, very poor and enemployed from getting a little slice of the pie!

  4. The Phantom
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 7:51 am | Permalink

    Received my 401k statement in the mail yesterday. It was absolutely flat for 2007, unfortunately it didn’t reflect the worst January stock market performance recorded!
    How did everyone else fare?

  5. ksagnostic
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 7:57 am | Permalink

    Max (1/31/08):”Ks,

    “Any candidate who has as primary objectives:

    “Redistribution of wealth
    “Expansion of Social Government programs

    “…is a Socialist.”

    This confirms that your view is pretty much what I said it was. Let me be clear on my perspective on this. Your viewpoint is the view of a fanatic. By your definition, for example, Pat Roberts is a socialist. The fact that such a statement reveals more about your inclusive definition of socialist and restrictive definition of non-socialist than it does any factual information. It is also clear that, under your definition, you not only live in a socialist country already, most of the people in this country are socialists.

    “The top 50% of taxpayers already pay 97% of the total Federal individual income tax. Yet Clinton and Obama want them to pay more. McCain says he wants to make the Bush tax cuts permanent, but he voted against them – twice.”

    Horrors (shudder)! Of course, the top 5% of tax payers also pay more in absolute terms than the bottom 95% (60% to 40%). The top 10% pays 70% to 30%, and the top 80% pays 86% to 14%. By the time we get to the top 50%, not only do they pay 97% of the taxes, they make 87% of the income. They have vastly more income to pay taxes on, so of course they are going to contribute more money in income taxes.

    BTW, the website that I have used probably has a point of view more similar to Max’s than my own. On the other hand, Max is pretty out there even among fiscal conservatives.

    This is a problem in your mind and the minds of people like you. The idea that wealth redistribution is such a huge evil. The fact of the matter is, the people who pay more income taxes are people who have more income to tax, and also people who can afford a greater share of their income being taken. That combination accounts for the discrepency. What would you prefer Max, that the bottom 50% pay 13% of the income taxes (which would be proportional)? That would be absurd and cruel. The bottom 50% could not afford that. By the way, that is actually a straw man to a certain extent, because as I recall the income tax proposal Max has proposed on this blog would not really do that (he would also exempt the poorest from paying income tax at all). In the end, however, I think Max’s tax proposal is a petty solution in search of a problem. I just don’t get worked up about this wealth redistribution issue like Max does. The poor are hardly living high on the hog at the expense of the rich. I don’t think the 97% verses 3% is all that grossly unfair (and yes, I am in the upper 50%).

    “ational Healthcare is proposed by both Clinton and Obama at a time when this country is facing:

    “9 Trillion+ in National Debt

    “ocial Security and Medicare Fiscal Crisis with $40 Trillion+ in unfunded obligations

    “nd Clinton/Obama have not offerred any solutions for either of these two enormous problems facing our nation.”

    To be fair, who has (and I already can anticipate Sol the Ron Paul evangelist jumping in with Ron Paul does!-let me just say, I think Ron Paul is a nitwit, and I thought he was a nitwit when he first ran for the presidency)? The healthcare crisis, however, is a legitimate crisis. I think leaving the situation as it currently is is untenable. However, the question of “how will you pay for this?” is fair. Max, I am more of a fiscal conservative than you may think I am (but our priorities are very very different). I think there is a difference between what can verses what “should” be done. However, if the idea that those who can pay for it will pay for it (sort of like income taxes), a healthcare program won’t be the budgetary drain that some think it may be. However, there is a budgetary crisis facing this country, and the aging population of this country is a looming issue (The AARP is the most dangerous lobbying firm in America).

    Which brings us to John McCain. He was right the first time. Cut and control spending, but maintain revenue. One of the reasons why Republicans have caused significant financial crises not only in the federal government, but in a number of states as well, is because one of their priorities is popular (cutting taxes) while the other really isn’t (cutting spending, which is surprisingly unpopular even among many Republicans).

    “When ksagnostic posts, don’t just consider her as the source, consider the lack of factual detail she has in anything she writes”

    At least I know the difference between facts (reality) and belief. I honestly don’t think you do (which is why I consider you to be a fanatic). BTW, I have the XY combination of chromosomes. If I have been in error in the way I have addressed you (I have tended to assume that you also are of the XY persuasion because I have assumed that those who think you are a she think that you are G. Sheridan, which I do not). If I am in error in this, and you are XX, let me know and I will make adjustments accordingly.

    And Dick Morris is still not reliable. I am hopiong that factcheck, when they weigh in on last night’s debate, gives us their take on Hillary’s experience claims (they have not addressed Bill Clinton’s claims about Hillary’s experience). At any rate, factcheck will be much more reliable than a dishonest piece of slime like Dick Morris.

  6. Regular
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 8:11 am | Permalink

    D
    N
    F
    T
    T

  7. Joe
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 8:21 am | Permalink

    401k lost last year but not as bad as the last Clinton year.

  8. Max
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 8:23 am | Permalink

    Economy sucks!

    Unemployment dropped to 4.9% from 5.0% in January.
    And the Dow Jones is up over 200 points today.
    Mortgage Refi market is now booming!

    Hurry up and send me that free government money! I can use that $1200 to by a new Springfield before Hillary bans them!

    Everybody- Go out and buy a shiny new gun with your tax rebate! 100 million more guns are needed to shore up The People’s inventory before the Clinton Gun Ban of 2009.

  9. The Phantom
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 8:27 am | Permalink

    Thank God for the Microsoft bid for yahoo, or there would have been real carnage in the markets today with the negative job growth!

  10. The Phantom
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 8:28 am | Permalink

    Max, better re-check the futures! Bush economy report came in.

  11. Max
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 8:33 am | Permalink

    Horrors (shudder)! Of course, the top 5% of tax payers also pay more in absolute terms than the bottom 95% (60% to 40%). The top 10% pays 70% to 30%, and the top 80% pays 86% to 14%. By the time we get to the top 50%, not only do they pay 97% of the taxes, they make 87% of the income. They have vastly more income to pay taxes on, so of course they are going to contribute more money in income taxes.

    This is a problem in your mind and the minds of people like you. The idea that wealth redistribution is such a huge evil.

    ksagnostic
    ———————————————-

    Sources ksagnostic. Curious as to your website you use. You just making these stats up? Your stats are flawed. Maybe you just can’t type. Or you just plain lie.

    Oh and ksagnostic, if wealth redistribution is good, then send a check to me in the amount $10,000.

    What?

    You are ok with other people having THEIR wealth redistributed, but not your own?

    Hmmm…..

    Look up Max’s Modified Flat tax plan if you think I’m some fanatic and cruel towards the poor. It’s very simple, progressive, and anyone earning <$25,000 pays Zero tax.

    Fanatic?

    Yeah, that just is too mean on the poor to allow them to earn $25,000 without paying any Federal tax.

  12. CapnAmerica
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 8:55 am | Permalink

    Max–

    I’ve shown over and over that the only real wealth re-distribution we’ve got going on in this country is from the middle class (you and me) to the fabulously wealthy.

    I have absolutely nothing against a person getting rich on the basis of their own hard work and good ideas.

    But I am 100 percent opposed to the kind of socialism for the rich we have way too much of in this country.

    Look at our own arena. I bought an 18,000 dollar truck a couple of years ago from Davis-Moore here in town. I paid close to 200 dollars in taxes on an arena that I don’t want and will never go to.

    However, the Koch bros. are already crowing about how cheap the sky-boxes are.

    That bothers me a helluva lot more than the few pennies I pay so that hungry kids can get gov’t cheese.

  13. larry
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 9:03 am | Permalink

    A Democrat accidently killed Max’s dog when he was a kid and he’s not forgotten. Or is that closed mindedness something typical of most Kansans?

  14. Max
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 9:05 am | Permalink

    Agree with you 100% Capn.

    But that redistribution of wealth you describe is not made through the income tax redistribution.

    I’m against that spending for arenas, football stadiums, casinos, etc….

    We have a major loss of manufacturing jobs in this country, as we discussed yesterday. With funds going to all these projects for the rich, we are stealing dollars from The People that would be better spent on capital investments that would grow our manufacturing industry.

  15. CapnAmerica
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 9:16 am | Permalink

    Right, Max.

    And that’s the blind spot that you conservatives have about taxation.

    You think that the only tax that matters is the income tax.

    But as has been shown over and over, the middle class (you and me) pay a higher share–much higher share–of our income to income tax than the rich do.

    More money is collected from the rich as a group, of course, because they make so much more money. But you notice that none of the rich are going to trade places with any of us so they can pay our taxes, which I repeat, is a higher percentage of our income than they pay.

    *****

    Here’s David Cay Johnston again:

    Question: Why do voters agree to arenas and special taxes [like the one in Arlington that made GW Bush rich]?

    DCJ: Well, first of all, it was a special election that drew a small number of voters. So it was a distinct minority in favor of this. Legally, there’s no question that we can do this. And it’s going on all across America. So it leads to a bigger question, it seems to me. The great economic mystery of our time is how can we have had almost thirty years of wonderful economic growth – more than half the wealth in America has been created since Ronald Reagan was elected president of the US. The Wall Street Journal’s editorial page often reminds us of that!

    And yet the statistics show – the official government data show – that the vast majority of Americans are either not better off, barely better off, or worse off. What’s happening is we have put in place all these policies, including tax increases in a variety of communities, that take money out of the pockets of the many and funnel it into the pockets of the few. I don’t think most Americans, if they understood that, would be in support of that idea. This is not market capitalism. This is handcuffing the market and having government make your money for you.

  16. CapnAmerica
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 9:44 am | Permalink

    http://www.newstatesman.com/200801310011

    How the War Was Spun

    from the New Statesman UK

    The Foreign Office has been ordered to release an early secret draft of the WMD dossier. Chris Ames says it will reveal a deliberate attempt to exaggerate the danger

    The “uranium from Africa” claim became highly controversial after President George W Bush quoted it in his January 2003 State of the Union speech, shortly before the start of the Iraq War. Weeks later, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) announced that documents it had received, “which formed the basis for the reports of recent transactions”, were actually crude forgeries.

    The controversy deepened in July 2003 when the former US diplomat Joseph Wilson let it be known that he had visited Niger and discounted the possibility that Iraq had sought uranium. In retaliation, the Bush administration leaked the fact that Wilson’s wife, Valerie Plame, was a covert CIA agent. Following a criminal investigation, Scooter Libby, chief of staff to Vice-President Dick Cheney, was given a prison sentence for perjury and obstruction of justice, which Bush commuted.

    The US withdrew the uranium claim after Wilson’s reve lation, but Tony Blair insisted that Britain had separate intelligence. Lord Butler’s review of pre-war intelligence described the dossier’s uranium claim as “well-founded”, based on intelligence it had seen. In fact, the New Statesman can now report that the intelligence was from Italy – the source also for the US intelligence that led to Wilson’s Africa trip.

    Since the uranium controversy, the government has insisted that it had both a source separate from the fake documents and intelligence it could not share with the US because it came from another country. But it is now clear that Britain has no remaining credible source that was unknown to the US.

    ******

    The lies to whip up hatred and fear for war are quickly told and believed. The refutation of those lies is a slow process, but a steady one nevertheless . . .

  17. ksfarmgrrl
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 10:55 am | Permalink

    “Or is that closed mindedness something typical of most Kansans”

    Well, it’s typical of at least seventy percent of Kansas voters.

    And funny thing, Obama had NO empathy deficit when he let donnie mcclurkin preach his hate for thirty minutes at the end of an Obama fundraiser? Empathy is as empathy does.

    And the catholic church had nothing BUT an empathy deficit when it was the largest funder of the campaign to pass the hateful marriage amendment. And NOW the church wants to whine when it’s members (read contributors) are the ones being treated with little empathy?

    Empathy is as empathy does. I thought empathy wasnt supposed to be selective.

    So.. according to Obama AND the catholic church…

    Empathy for illegals = good.

    Empathy for gays and their families = bad.

    Got it.

    Jesus WEPT. Can you say “double standard”? heheheh!

  18. Max
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 11:12 am | Permalink

    2005 Income Share Percentage and Tax Share Percentage

    % of Income % of Tax
    Top 1%____21.2%_______39.38%
    Top 5%____35.75%______59.67%
    Top 10%___46.44%______70.30%
    Top 25%___67.52%______85.99%
    Top 50%___87.17%______96.93%
    Bottom
    50%_______12.83%____ __3.07%

    Note the Top 1% of taxpayers earn 21.2% of total income, yet pay 39.38% of the total tax.

    The Top 10% of taxpayers earn 46.44% of total income, yet pay 70.30% of the total tax.

    The Bottom 50% of taxpayers earn 12.83% of total income, yet pay only 3.07% of the total tax.

    My numbers are from the IRS:

    http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/05in05tr.xls

    http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/05in06tr.xls

  19. Max
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 11:13 am | Permalink

    Sorry the column headings don’t line up. Sure miss the preview function on the old blog.

  20. Max
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 11:15 am | Permalink

    NEW and IMPROVED! Now Even MORE Socialist in 2005 then in 2004!

    Of all people who file income tax returns, the top 10% pay 70.30% (that’s more than 2/3!) of ALL income taxes!

    I wonder what their fair share of the total income tax is?

    The bottom 50% of all income tax filers only pay 3.07% of all taxes.

    ……………Income …Tax Share
    Top 1%___>$364,657___39.38%
    Top 5%___>$145,283___59.67%
    Top 10%__>$103,912___70.30%
    Top 25%__> $62,068___85.99%
    Top 50%__> $30,881___96.93%
    Bottom
    50%______< $30,881____3.07%

    http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/05in05tr.xls

    http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/05in06tr.xls

  21. Max
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 11:16 am | Permalink

    It might interest some to know that according to the IRS, the effective tax rates are as follows:

    Top % Tax Rate
    1%………..23.13%
    5%………..20.78%
    10%……….18.84%
    25%……….15.86%
    50%……….13.84%
    Bottom 50%….2.98%

    OVERALL……12.45%

    http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/05in05tr.xls

    http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/05in06tr.xls

    Did you notice the bottom 50%? Those who make less then $30,881 on average pay an effective tax rate of just 2.98% of their income.

    So, half the country is OK with the current IRS tax structure, EXCEPT that they want taxes to be increased for everybody else!

  22. Max
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 11:22 am | Permalink

    MAX’s MODIFIED FLAT TAX PLAN, would have a flat rate of 20% on ALL income above $25,000 per person who earns income.

    ..No more deductions (except for the $25,000 deduction per individual and IRA/401k/Keough deductions for self-employed)

    Gone is the mortgage interest deduction.

    Gone is tax exempt interest (eg. Municipal bonds AND THIS IS WHERE THE RICH SHELTER THEIR INCOME TODAY!)

    Gone is the itemized deduction.

    Gone is the Unearned Income Credit.

    Gone is the Child and Child care Credits.

    Gone is the Cow/Calf credit, etc….

    Doesn’t matter whether you are married, single, divorced, living by yourself or with 10 people. What business is it of government what your status is? Why should your marital or sexual status determine your tax rate? (Being gay or straight, married or single shouldn’t matter to the government!)

    All the rich living off of tax free municipal investments will now have this income taxed.
    Social Security? It’s already been taxed, so all Social Security income should be exempt from taxes the 2nd time.

    And since Social Security is going to be Means Tested, benefits will be reduced by those who have a lot of assets and have saved a lot of money on their own too. And since we will need to phase out Social Security for some, we need to encourage Private Savings, so 401k/IRA/Keough deductions would still be allowed. (This defers the tax. This is not a tax exemption. The tax will be paid later on when the money is taken out.)

    That’s it. Simple. Flat, yet allows $25,000 to live on, and that makes this tax less regressive then just a flat tax.

    Welfare for the very poor will continue. No one starves in this country (far from it most are obese) and no one will starve in the future.

    Your tax return is 1 page, we can cut back the IRS by 75%. They will still audit self-employed and businesses.

  23. Max
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 11:24 am | Permalink

    Examples of Max’s Flat Tax (all assume no IRA/401k/Keough deductions for simplicity):

    If I earn:

    $25,000 or less, I pay $0 tax. Effective tax rate is 0%.

    $30,000, I pay (30,000 – 25,000 * .2) $1,000 in taxes. Effective tax rate is 3.3%.

    $40,000, I pay (40,000 – 25,000 * .2) $3,000 in taxes. Effective tax rate is 7.5%.

    $50,000, I pay (50,000 – 25,000 * .2) $5,000 in taxes. Effective tax rate is 10%.

    $75,000, I pay $10,000 in taxes. Effective tax rate is 13.3%.

    $100,000, I pay $15,000 in taxes. Effective tax rate is 15%.

    $150,000, I pay $25,000 in taxes. Effective tax rate is 16.6%.

    $250,000, I pay $45,000 in taxes. Effective tax rate is 18%.

    $500,000, I pay $95,000 in taxes. Effective tax rate is 19%.

    $1,000,000, I pay $195,000 in taxes. Effective tax rate is 19.5%.

    $10,000,000, I pay $1,995,000 in taxes. Effective tax rate is 19.55%.

    NOTE: This is a modified flat tax. Note the PROGRESSION in Effective Tax rates as your income rises!

    Also note, the rich with tax shelters will be paying taxes on all income (except Social Security which was already taxed). No more tax shelters!

    Note also that two people living together (man/woman, man/man, woman/woman, married/single) can each earn up to $25,000 without paying ANY tax. Bob and Tom live together. Bob makes $23,000 and Tom earns $24,000. Neither pays any tax!

  24. ghotiphaze
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 11:35 am | Permalink

    think Ron Paul is a nitwit, and I thought he was a nitwit when he first ran for the presidency)

    I see your point on this, ksagnostic. I do think it’s going a bit far. I agree with some of his stances (heck, everyone has SOMETHING I can get behind), think some are great ideas but he’ll never get them accomplished in this country, and disagree with a good many things. Kinda like I am with eeveryone running. I can’t remember when we’ve ever had a good choice of candidates, but i can only remember to Kennedy administration.
    I’m convinced the Ron Paul sincerely believes what he’s saying, as opposed to everyone else who wants YOU to believe what they’re saying.

  25. ghotiphaze
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 11:37 am | Permalink

    boy, if that ain’t an opening for econ: “when reality comes in the door, honesty and integrity jump out the window”

    Right, econ?

  26. ghotiphaze
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 11:38 am | Permalink

    Everybody- Go out and buy a shiny new gun

    You need a gun, max? you ARE intellectually limited, aren’t you?

  27. Tom Paine
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 11:45 am | Permalink

    why not cut government spending and have no income tax?

  28. ghotiphaze
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 11:46 am | Permalink

    Jesus WEPT. Can you say “double standard”?

    agreed, KFG. I think it’s more of blanket statement from the church (gotta keep makin’ babies to keep our coffers full for eternity). Remember in the 70’s (remember what gay rights were like back then???), some of my jesuit teachers really didn’t have a problem with gays.

    Then again, it was jesuits who taught me to think for myself and become totally anti-religion.

  29. Ben
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 11:49 am | Permalink

    Phantom – up about 6% or so for 2007. Of course, I gave it all back in January.

  30. annie moose
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 12:03 pm | Permalink

    Nobody likes to pay taxes.The real boogy man is rising inflation rate.Here’s a good overview from 2005:

    http://www.financialsense.com/stormwatch/2005/0624.html

  31. Max
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 12:36 pm | Permalink

    Income Inequality: How Census Data Misrepresent Income Distribution
    by Robert E. Rector and Rea S. Hederman, Jr.
    Center for Data Analysis Report #99-07

    Political debate on income in the United States often has been characterized as competition between two schools of economic thought: one that focuses on the long-term increase in general prosperity and one that focuses on the equalization of existing incomes. Proponents of the first approach have much to hearten them; the long-term increase in economic well-being in the United States has been enormous. Today, the standard of living for the average American is nearly seven times higher than it was 100 years ago, after adjusting for inflation.2 The large gains in prosperity have affected all Americans, including low-income groups. At present, workers earning the minimum wage comprise the lowest-paid 2 percent of all employees. Yet today’s minimum wage worker earns more, in real terms, in a single day than a low-skilled worker earned in an entire six-day workweek at the turn of the century. In other words, today’s minimum wage worker earns more in eight hours than a low-skilled worker earned in 70 or more hours a century ago.3

    http://www.heritage.org/Research/Labor/CDA99-07.cfm

  32. CapnAmerica
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 12:47 pm | Permalink

    Max
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 11:16 am | Permalink
    It might interest some to know that according to the IRS, the effective tax rates are as follows:

    Top % Tax Rate
    1%………..23.13%
    5%………..20.78%
    10%……….18.84%
    25%……….15.86%
    50%……….13.84%
    Bottom 50%….2.98%

    OVERALL……12.45%

    http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/05in05tr.xls

    http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/05in06tr.xls

    Did you notice the bottom 50%? Those who make less then $30,881 on average pay an effective tax rate of just 2.98% of their income.

    ******

    Max, Max, Max–

    You make me despair that the right-wing can ever be changed by appeal to rational thought.

    The above is true, but only if you ignore the simple fact that payroll taxes are income taxes too, but ONLY ON THE MIDDLE CLASS.

    FICA is only taken out up to income of 102,000 (or close to it).

    To figure out the real rates of taxation, you’d have to add about 13 percent to those figures, except for the RICHEST taxpayers, so that it would look like this:

    Top % Tax Rate
    1%………..23.13%
    5%………..20.78%
    10%……….18.84%
    25%……….28.86%
    50%……….16.84%
    Bottom 50%….15.98%

    Now the top 25 percent–people making between 50-100 grand (you and me again, Max), are paying the highest rate of taxation.

  33. CapnAmerica
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 12:51 pm | Permalink

    And interesting how the IRS does NOT include Social Security taxes when it talks about tax rates, but it DOES when it talks about total money collected and paid out.

    When you separate the dedicated tax to Social Security pay ins and pay outs, it turns out that the next most expensive item in the budget is — SURPRISE! — the military budget.

    More than half of the money collected by income tax will fund the military, past and present, but it still won’t be enough because of massive deficit spending.

  34. J R
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 12:53 pm | Permalink

    GREAT debate last night!

    Clinton/Obama 08!

    John Edwards for AG
    Al Gore for Interior Secretary

  35. CapnAmerica
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 12:55 pm | Permalink

    Heh, no way, JR.

    Did you see those rock-ribbed conservatives over at MoveOn.org have backed Obama.

    He’s got the mojo hand . . .

    GOBAMA!

  36. mrcontroversy
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 12:55 pm | Permalink

    Has anybody read the post on the caucuses in the editor’s blog?
    Outrageous, but not surprising.

  37. CapnAmerica
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 12:57 pm | Permalink

    Clinton still can’t explain or apologize for her vote for endless war in Iraq.

    Obama on the other hand in a speech on public record from the floor of the Illinois Senate laid out in chilling detail what would happen if we invaded and was opposed from day one.

  38. J R
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 12:57 pm | Permalink

    We are not quite ready to TRUST Obama yet.

    Guess I’ll be resigning my membership at Moveon.

    Obama can take the big chair in 2016.

  39. CapnAmerica
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 12:59 pm | Permalink

    MrC.

    I don’t go there anymore.

    Those posts are so ignorant and vile . . . I just want to think more highly of people than that.

  40. CapnAmerica
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 12:59 pm | Permalink

    Between no experience and wrong experience, I’m going with the former.

  41. mrcontroversy
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 1:05 pm | Permalink

    Capn-
    Not sure what you mean.
    I just don’t think their statement on saying Eagle employees can attend the Republican caucus and not the Democratic holds water.
    My viewers and readers have known of my involvement with the Edwards campaign, James Barfield’s support of Obama, and Phil Journey’s support of Huckabee. None of our viewers have complained.
    After all, how in the heck are you supposed to know what you’re talking about…and not have an opinion about it?

  42. ksfarmgrrl
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 1:20 pm | Permalink

    KsAgnostic, I wanted to post this on the appropriate thread, but it seems locked, so here goes…

    Thanks for agreeing with me about sebelius and the holcomb plant and her weasely ways of getting it built while still seeming to have her hands off it.

    As to me and the “du types”…

    I’m wondering if you actually READ DU. Because if you do, you will see that the DU posters, like Captain, who posts under a different name there, are supporting… wait for it… OBAMA!

    Yep. It’s true. There are waaaaay more pro-Obama posts over there than pro-Hillary posts. And the moveon MEMBER endorsement is further evidence, that it isnt the wingnut fringe of the democratic party that supports obama. Far from it.

    I find it interesting that sebelius would align herself with the DU and moveon types. I guess that is what lust for higher office will do for ya. And guess what? When obama proves himself to be too inexperienced to deal with the mighty right wing wurlizer, they will turn on him faster than the republican wingnuts turned on McCain.

    Obama will find himself a man without a party if he doesnt deliver what he’s promised to the evangelical gay haters in SC, to the DU types and to Moveon.

    Because ya know, he cant keep ALL those promises to ALL those opposing groups. Better for Hillary to lose the democratic fringe in the primary than to lose the party after the election.

    And really. If obama is weak and fails with his kumbaya strategy to get republicans to cooperate? Just WHO do you think will be out on their ass in two years?

    Ya know, in “bidness” there is a saying that it is better to underpromise and over deliver than to do the opposite. I fear obama is overpromising and will under deliver.

    With Hillary? WYSIWYG. Love it or hate it, she’s a known quantity and able to helm the ship steady as she goes. Obama? Not so much. I think he’ll find the winds of “inspiration” to be fickle. When slapped in the face with the reality of an underdelivering Obama, he could find his followers to be just as easily “uninspired”.

    Remember what I said before… The race does not always go to the swift and the strong.

    But that’s DAMN SURE how you bet your money. Not on the “inspirational” horses.

  43. ksfarmgrrl
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 1:22 pm | Permalink

    Oops. DAMMIT!

    This: isnt the wingnut fringe of the democratic party that supports obama

    SHOULD have been: it isnt the wingnut fringe of the democratic party that supports Hillary. Far from it.

    Go to DU and see the trashing that Hillary gets.

  44. J R
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 1:32 pm | Permalink

    Said simpler to the Obama supporters?

    You BETTER learn to love your enemies. I don’t know that you’ll be able to trust your new “friends”.

    I was all for Obama. I was for Kucinich, but I weighed Edwards, Clinton, and Obama the same consideration.

    Then Obama started extolling Reagan and calling the GOP the “party of ideas” without including the adjective “bad”. THEN he started getting cozy with some fairly despicable people.

    I’m not ready to make Obama the defacto leader of the Democratic party. Not until I am sure he is IN the party.

    Only way I can even vote for Obama at ALL is if it is Obama/Clinton. That at least would make Senator Clinton President of the Senate.

  45. The Phantom
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 1:34 pm | Permalink

    If you had a national sales tax instead of income tax, the rich would just buy everything in tax free zones.

  46. Jennifer
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 1:42 pm | Permalink

    Whether the social security payroll tax should be considered an income tax depends on whether you view social security as the government forcing you to save for your own retirement, or as a transfer payment to those who are already retired.

  47. sursum
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 1:43 pm | Permalink

    Phantom: A British report to-day says the two women who blew themslves up suffered from Downes Syndrome.

  48. Posted February 1, 2008 at 1:47 pm | Permalink

    Poor Max… he posts like a broken record!! And what is interesting, records are nearly obsolete!! Max all you do is post the same darned tax figures all the time!! You arent addressing whatever it is you think your problem is!! READ what CapN wrote… READ what ksagnostic wrote…

  49. Ben
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 1:59 pm | Permalink

    MrC – ask Phil about mu idea of a McCain-Huckabee ticket.

  50. Max
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 2:04 pm | Permalink

    Social Security report during the Clinton administration. 11/20/1997

    Some have said that Bush’s Social Security report is not accurate.

    Ok, then trust the Clinton report.

    Either version of the trustee report looks bad. Now what did Clinton propose to solve this problem?

    http://www.gao.gov/archive/1998/he98043t.pdf

    Also, the demographic trends underlying Social Security’s financing problem are contributing significantly to increasing cost pressures for
    Medicare and Medicaid. Federal budget policy faces a profound challenge from the tremendous imbalance between these promised entitlements and
    the revenues currently planned to fund them.

    While Social Security’s financing is projected to pay full benefits until 2029, it will start to pose challenges for the federal budget much earlier—only 10 years from now.

    This fact illustrates the critical importance of examining how budget policy interacts with proposed reforms to Social Security and other
    entitlements. It also illustrates the need to act sooner rather than later.

    Timely policy adjustments can help us get onto a more sustainable fiscal path and may even help increase national saving and promote economic
    growth, which could ease the adjustments that current demographic trends will require.

  51. ksfarmgrrl
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 2:17 pm | Permalink

    Hey Mr. C, thanks for pointing me to the editor’s blog.

    heheheh. I loved this part:

    “I realize there’s no perfect answer to this situation, and this policy has its flaws.”

    No shit.

    “It opens us to the appearance of treating two political parties differently.”

    Ya think?

    “But I also can’t see my way to prohibiting participation in the Republican caucus just so we have a parallel policy for two very different events.”

    Uh, wouldnt that be the “fair and balanced way of doing it?

    “The issue with the Democratic caucus is purely in the way the party has structured the event.”

    OH-PULEEEZE!

    Yeah. I’m soooooo sure. Given the WE’s slavish devotion to the republican party, particularly tihrt and bush…

    I’m so SURE it’s just a “structural” issue.

    Hehehehehehehehheehehehheeh. That shoulda been on the FUNNY pages.

  52. BG
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 2:20 pm | Permalink

    Phantom, there is no such thing as a tax free zone when you move to the National sales tax…

  53. Max
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 2:24 pm | Permalink

    Capn, typical Lib to distort the facts I presented with your made-up numbers.

    You want to mix apples and oranges to make your point about how terrible the Federal Government is in their tax policy for the poor and middle class.

    You completely Make-Up numbers and expect anyone rational to go along with you!

    Capn, you have argued in the past that Social Security is sound, always has been and always will be. The pay as you go system is completely funded by itself and separate from the rest of the Federal budget.

    Now you want it mixed to make your fake point.

    Social Security 6.2% of an employees pay earned up to $102,000 for 2008. Medicare is 1.45% of all earned income with No Cap.

    Self-employed people see double the rates above: 14.4% Social Security, and 2.9% Medicare.

    Now Capn, if you want to guarantee proportionally higher Social Security Benefits compared to what is paid-in for taxes, I’m ok with lifting the Cap.

    But you can’t.

    “The basic structure of the social security system also introduces inequities in benefits as a result of differences in income. Every social security beneficiary receives a guaranteed minimum benefit. Beyond this guaranteed minimum, increases in income lead to increases in benefits up to a maximum level of benefits. The result of this structure is a system that gives low-income recipients a higher than proportionate share of benefits.” http://www.cato.org/pubs/journal/cj14n1-4.html

    So maybe those at lower income levels pay a higher percentage of their income in Social Security (not Medicare)taxes, but they also receive disproportionately HIGHER benefits as well.

    And when you factor in the likelihood of MEANS TESTING in the near future, those at the higher income levels will likely see Reduced or even Eliminated Benefits.

  54. BG
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 2:27 pm | Permalink

    Capn, Payroll taxes are not an income tax, they are a social benefit that you pay for and get back. not to mention you get back double what you paid in. you pay in 13% but get back 26% percent in benefits, because the other 13% is paid by your employer, not to mention inflation payments to Social security almost guarentee you get more back then you paid in. unless you die within 10 years of receiveing payments. and not to mention medicare always pay’s out more then ot received from you in payments.

  55. Max
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 2:38 pm | Permalink

    Do a quick calc on your Social Security benefits here:

    http://www.ssa.gov/OACT/quickcalc/index.html

    3 People, all born 1/1/1970 and all retire on 1/1/2037 at their NORMAL retirement age of 67.

    1. Max Earns $150,000/year
    2. Capn Earns $50,000/year
    3. JR Earns $25,000/year

    Max’s benefit is $2,442/month.

    Capn’s benefit is $1,725/month. Now Capn earned 33% of what Max did (and paid less in taxes), but gets paid 71% of the benefit that Max does!

    JR’s benefit is $1,070/month. Now JR earned 17% of what Max did (and paid less in taxes), but gets paid 44% of the benefit that Max does!

    IMPORTANT NOTE: Means testing will likely cut or eliminate Max’s Social Security benefits. So the inequality of benefits paid will increase even more!

  56. ksagnostic
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 2:41 pm | Permalink

    On a different tack:

    This is beyond disgusting.

  57. ksagnostic
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 2:42 pm | Permalink

    OK, let’s try again.

    This is beyond disgusting (don’t know why the url trick didn’t work this time).

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22945797

  58. Vaughn Tolle
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 2:45 pm | Permalink

    Max, come on; if your earnings over your lifetime were, in fact, $150,000 each year thereof, only a part thereof (a growing part over time) were subject to OASDI. A better comparison, if one is to be made, is what fraction of your compensation that was subject to OASDI taxes was/is Capn’s and JR’s.

    That said, and assuming the benefit amounts listed are correct, which knowing Max they are, there would still not be pure proportionality between contributions/benefits, given the minimum benefit floor and the maximum benefit ceiling.

  59. WichiWomn
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 2:53 pm | Permalink

    I found this on a comments section elsewhere and thought it was funny.

    Electile Dysfunction : the inability to become aroused over any of the choices for president put forth by either party in the 2008 election year.

  60. Max
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 2:53 pm | Permalink

    Thanks Vaughn for the confidence in the numbers, I try to be factually accurate to make my points.

    (Numbers above are as accurate as the SSA web site)

    I believe the income cap this year on Social Security taxes is $102,000.

    So in the example above, Max would pay more then 2 times the SS tax as Capn, and more then 3 times the SS tax as JR.

    Yet Capn still gets 71% of the benefit Max does, and JR gets 44% of the benefit Max does.

    (Assuming all 3 live to receive benefits and that Means Testing doesn’t reduce or eliminate Max and/or Capn’s benefits)

    So Vaughn, you are right, they are still not proportionate – the lower and middle income groups gets more benefit dollars per tax dollars paid in!

  61. mrcontroversy
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 2:54 pm | Permalink

    agnostic:
    Concur.
    These are sick, sick puppies, and there is no justification for this whatsoever.

  62. Vaughn Tolle
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 3:00 pm | Permalink

    Max, one reason why, and you can check this out for yourself, is that there is a maximum benefit that may be received under Social Security. I thought you had pulled the numbers from the SSA website, as I was there a few months ago, and while a bit higher (due to the COLA effective 1 January), they rang true.

  63. WichiWomn
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 3:06 pm | Permalink

    It is obvious to me that the factions in Iraq just want to kill people, whoever and whenever they can. How low can you get using unwitting mentally challenged women to kill others? Those bastards care nothing for their own. Get our service people out of there.

  64. Eagle Beak
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 3:20 pm | Permalink

    Leathernecks. Time to circle the wagons.

    U.S. Senator Wants to Revoke Funding From City of Berkeley, Calif., for Vote to Boot Marines
    http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,327466,00.html

    Berkeley to Marine Corps: You’re Not Welcome
    Thursday, January 31, 2008

    http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,327347,00.html

    Council says Marines unwelcome in town
    BERKELEY: Board votes 6-3 to tell recruiting office it’s ‘uninvited,’ allow peace group protest hours
    Hey-hey, ho-ho, the Marines in Berkeley have got to go.

    http://www.contracostatimes.com/news/ci_8127668?nclick_check=1

    Passing the word. Call to arms.
    I have written the entire Kansas delegation requesting them to support the effort to strip this city of all federal funds. Roads and social programs too.

    They don’t want our Marines,
    they don’t want our government,
    the don’t rate the benefits that go
    along with being American.

    Today you might say, “Got freedom?”

    “For those who have fought for it, freedom has a taste the protected will never know.”

  65. Max
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 3:20 pm | Permalink

    Correct Vaughn, there’s both a Minimum and a Maximum Social Security benefit.

    Since there is a Maximum benefit, it would be fair to have a Maximum cap on taxes paid in.

    If I recall all the campaign promises correctly, I believe Clinton and Obama both favored eliminating the Maximum cap on taxes – thus the Disparity between benefits and taxes paid even larger. Again more Socialist then today, in redistributing wealth using the Social Security system to do it.

    Raise your hand if you want to pay more Social Security taxes, and NOT get more Social Security benefits!

    Anybody?

    Ok, those who earn less then the Cap, please put all of your hands down now!

  66. NN
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 3:25 pm | Permalink

    Be very cautious to tinker with a tax structure, for if you change a part of it you will eventually have to adjust many other parts as well. There is no doubt that a VAT or tax on sale of goods generates taxable income for the Government, but it might tip over a lot of other rather tax codes leaving unforseen disasters everywhere. Some countries were able to institue VAT systems easily, as with their National Insurance Health Plans, because their original tax structure absorded new things well. Hereabout we were a fiscal basket case until the VAT was introduced, but now surpluses are common and employment perking right along. The PM who introduced the VAT (and also signed the NAFTA treaty),was booted out of office immediatly and his party reduced from 200 plus to only two seats in Parliament. I’ve adapted to the VAT tax but NAFTA still annoys me. An overhaul of any tax code is going to cause someone his job.

  67. Max
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 3:26 pm | Permalink

    Eagle Beak, maybe the Marines should practice amphibius landings in Berkeley.

    Cesar Chavez Park, and the Golden Gate Fields look like perfect Landing Zones for advancing to the San Pablo Dam road.

    Just an exercise. No live rounds needed in town of course.

    http://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&tab=wl

  68. Vaughn Tolle
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 3:27 pm | Permalink

    Max, I’ve long believed there should be neither a cap on the maximum benefit nor a cap on the compensation subject to FICA. I’ve not “run the numbers”, but I’ve a feeling the additional contributions would outweigh the additional benefits which might be paid under such a system. Just me being me, I guess.

  69. Max
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 3:29 pm | Permalink

    NN, you Canadians are a shining example of prosperity, eh.

    How’s the GST and PST working out for you to go along with the VAT and the income tax?

    50% of Americans who are paying only 3% of the income tax would probably love your Canadian Socialist plan.

    Those who don’t pay taxes, are always for more taxes.

  70. Max
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 3:33 pm | Permalink

    Either way Vaugn would be more fair, but we both know that’s not going to happen.

    With a $40 Trillion shortfall, there will have to be some combination (if not all) of:

    1. Means Testing to reduce or eliminate Social Security benefits for those with other income over $X or assets higher then $Y.

    2. Higher Social Security tax rates.

    3. Lifting of all Maximum Caps on taxes paid.

    To pay for Social Security, it will have to become even more inequitable then it is already.

    Those earning more then around $75,000/year today better be saving as much of their own money as they are allowed to keep, as they are likely to get Nothing for Social Security.

    Or maybe, you are better off NOT to save and NOT to have any Assets?

  71. BG
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 3:34 pm | Permalink

    get article discribing how Tricle down econimics works and how the ripples stop going out from the evil rich.

    http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/businesstechnology/2004150613_luxsqueeze29.html

  72. Vaughn Tolle
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 3:37 pm | Permalink

    Max, in a very perverse way, there are certain factual situations where one might be better off to not save and to not have any assets. In most cases, it is better to save and to have assets, but anyone who cannot envision at least one situation where it isn’t, is not really working at it or divorced from reality.

  73. Ben
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 3:42 pm | Permalink

    Even if they don’t change the caps ‘as is’ I think they should increase the tax base to 1.5x the benefit cap base. My reason: It is in this area that spousam benefit becomes more important – therefore they can receive 150% of the ‘regular’ benefit between them.

    Down in my area taxpayer and spouse each draw their own.

  74. Taz
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 3:47 pm | Permalink

    Talk about an out of control government. There is a bill (HB282) in the Mississippi legislature that has as its intent/description:

    Description: Food establishments; prohibit from serving food to any person who is obese.

    How would YOU like to be the poor minimum wage clerk telling mr or ms fatty that you cannot serve them because they are too fat?

    This is outrageous…taking big brother government to places it should NEVER go. And..then expect cashiers to enforce it.

    Mississippi is really “out there”. What is next, mandatory annual blood pressure screening????

  75. Nathan
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 3:54 pm | Permalink

    Taz,

    You bring up one of my arguments against “free” health care.

    Why should I have to pay the taxes to provide “free” health care to someone who doesn’t take care of themselves?

  76. Posted February 1, 2008 at 3:58 pm | Permalink

    Nathan, what the heck does the Fat Ban have to do with paying taxes for Free Health Care?? And I do believe people are not talking Free Health Care… but rather, Affordable Health Care??

  77. Nathan
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 4:02 pm | Permalink

    Chas,

    Do you have health care?

  78. CapnAmerica
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 4:02 pm | Permalink

    I tried folks, and I failed miserably.

    You can’t reason with a Max after decades of Rush Limbaughtomizing.

    The simple facts are these: the IRS counts income collected through these taxes–

    (from publication 2105)

    Income

    Social Security, Medicare,
    and other retirement taxes 32%
    Personal income taxes 35%
    Corporate income tax 8%
    Excise, customs, estate, gift,
    and miscellaneous taxes 7%
    Borrowing to cover deficit 18%

    And it spends that income on these

    Outlays

    Social Security, Medicare, and other retirement 36%
    Law enforcement and general government 3%
    National defense, veterans,
    and foreign affairs 23%
    Social programs 21%
    Physical, human, and
    community development 10%
    Net interest on the the debt 7%

    *****

    For people making less than 102,000, SS is a high percentage of the amount of tax they pay.

    Maybe people who pay in less to SS shouldn’t get proportionally more back than the higher earners, as Max points out.

    But that is not the issue.

    The issue is what is the total tax burden on the middle class compared to the total tax burden on the rich?

    Answer–the middle class pays more.

    This idea is not original to me–Warren Buffet has been preaching the unfairness of it to whoever will listen . . .

  79. Posted February 1, 2008 at 4:04 pm | Permalink

    Nathan, that is a ridiculous question!! Unless you have some reason for asking it…

  80. CapnAmerica
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 4:06 pm | Permalink

    And BTW, notice how the IRS sleazily conflates Medicare AND Social Security (32 percent collected) to Medicare AND Social Security pay outs (36 percent outlay).

    That is next to a lie. Medicare is so underfunded, that when one lumps both programs together, it looks like SS is in deficit.

    In fact SS is in massive surplus, but thanks to Bush’s “no bid contracts” for Big Pharma, Medicare is spending SS’s surplus and much more . . .

  81. Nathan
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 4:06 pm | Permalink

    Chas,

    Just trying to figure out how you afforded it, since you are an advocate for “afforadable” health care.

  82. Posted February 1, 2008 at 4:08 pm | Permalink

    And how do you afford YOUR health care??

  83. CapnAmerica
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 4:13 pm | Permalink

    Chas–

    The government pays for Nathan’s health care, of course.

    He’s part of the biggest socialistic program the government has ever or will ever run–the standing Armed Forces of the United States of America.

    It is so socialistic, it provides not only pay and medical care, but food, housing, clothing, haircuts, dental care, counselling, transportation to and from work, insurance and funeral expenses.

    It also provides heavily subsidized food and products at what used to be called the PX.

    Even the liquor is tax subsidized.

  84. Posted February 1, 2008 at 4:14 pm | Permalink

    I know CapN.. Thats why it is totally spurious to ask ME about My health care!! LOL

  85. Posted February 1, 2008 at 4:18 pm | Permalink

    What makes it sad, but laughable, is that Nathan’s Health Care is paid for by TAX DOLLARS… Tax Dollars that he would deny using to help those who are less fortunate to get a minimal amount of health care — a level they can AFFORD to pay…

    That is the irony of Nathan’s argument!! LOL

  86. Taz
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 4:19 pm | Permalink

    Capn…

    You forgot the side benefits. Travel to exotic places and engage in combat, with the chance of being killed or maimed.

    Socialistic? I would prefer to think of it as caring for the people who are or have served their country. Regardless of the unpopularity of a particular conflict, the veterans have earned every ounce of benefits.

  87. Posted February 1, 2008 at 4:21 pm | Permalink

    Taz, I dont know about CapN… but i dont have a problem with military being given as good of health care benefits as possible… We send them to dangerous places… We should cover their health care… during their enlistment, AND a good bit of it after…

  88. fleettwood
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 4:21 pm | Permalink

    capn’s remarks above show once again how it is imperitive that we keep the Libs out of the White House. Disgusting.

  89. Posted February 1, 2008 at 4:22 pm | Permalink

    However, Taz, it IS Socialistic… no matter how you cut it…

  90. Posted February 1, 2008 at 4:23 pm | Permalink

    Why fleet??? CapN tells the truth… I guess you want Truth kept out of the White House?? You afraid it might make the paint peel?? LOL

  91. Max
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 4:24 pm | Permalink

    Taz
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 3:47 pm | Permalink
    Talk about an out of control government. There is a bill (HB282) in the Mississippi legislature that has as its intent/description:

    Description: Food establishments; prohibit from serving food to any person who is obese.

    How would YOU like to be the poor minimum wage clerk telling mr or ms fatty that you cannot serve them because they are too fat?

    This is outrageous…taking big brother government to places it should NEVER go. And..then expect cashiers to enforce it.

    Mississippi is really “out there”. What is next, mandatory annual blood pressure screening????
    ————————————————-

    Please note Hillary Clinton’s HillaryCare! plan to save $1 Trillion dollars at the web site below.

    Now, I don’t know how Hillary is planning on Enforcing Obesity Reduction, but Tax, HB282 might just be a part of the hidden details of Hillary’s plan.

    The $1 Trillion savings from obesity reduction is included in the offsets used by Clinton to pay for her plan. The question is “how will she enforce obseity reductions?”

    Muzzles? Forced reduction surgery? Who knows?

    http://www.hillaryclinton.com/files/pdf/healthcarecosts.pdf

    o Obesity intervention: If obesity among the elderly were to return to the level in the
    1980s, then savings could total a trillion dollars over a 25 year period.xlv

  92. Posted February 1, 2008 at 4:25 pm | Permalink

    The only President I can remembe who actually PUSHED cutting health care benefits to Veterans, is the yayhoo who is in there now!! If there was another one, then he would also be a yayhoo!!

  93. ANTI J R
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 4:26 pm | Permalink

    Military service is by choice, socialism is not. That is the BIG difference.

  94. Posted February 1, 2008 at 4:26 pm | Permalink

    Why not invent some more Hillary Lies Max?? You do it so well!! Better yet, go READ Hillary’s proposals for Health Care, and you might actually, *gasp* LEARN a few things!! LOL

  95. Posted February 1, 2008 at 4:28 pm | Permalink

    Thats true ANTI — And every person who signs on to military service, is signing their “life” away to the Military system of socialistic provisions/regulations… Check the UCMJ manual, and you will see that clearly!!

  96. Posted February 1, 2008 at 4:28 pm | Permalink

    Well, gotta go for now… Back later!! Y’all have a wonderful weekend!! GOOOO Super Bowl Winner!!

  97. Max
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 4:30 pm | Permalink

    Capn, your drinking demunderground coolaide again.

    (You are supposed to boil that before drinking)

    The IRS stats I posted do not include the Social Security/Medicare numbers you keep throwing into the mix.

    Your distortion of IRS data with Social Security/Medicare data is laughable and cute, but totally misleading.

    BTW- Say Capn, you like the HillaryCare! plan? What do the HillaryCare! cost/premium numbers look like? I haven’t seen them.

    And even if you haven’t, I’m sure you can make up some numbers that make more sense then what is in her plan.

    If Hillary is able to make us all more healthy and live longer, that will put even more stress on Social Security, though it may save some Medicare costs.

    http://www.hillaryclinton.com/files/pdf/healthcarecosts.pdf

  98. TDT
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 4:30 pm | Permalink

    ksag – That just makes me sick to my stomach. I work with the MR/DD population, and I know how easily they can be manipulated. To use KFGs saying, Jesus wept.

  99. CapnAmerica
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 4:31 pm | Permalink

    Wrong again, “Anti JR” (things getting boring around the McClure household, James?)

    The government forces us to pay for Nathan’s healthcare and everything else whether we want to or not.

  100. Nathan
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 4:32 pm | Permalink

    CapnAmerica and Chas,

    First, the Marine Corps doesn’t pay for my health care.

    I am in the Reserves. The only time I am covered is when I am at my drill weekend or I am under orders.

    Second, you could hardly call it socialist.

    Although “similar” you completely disregard the military’s mission and purpose by simply stating that it is socialism.

    When someone is in the military they are working for everything they get. They are paid less than their civilian counterparts because all those things like food, housing, and health care are taken into account.

    It would be a logistical nightmare to employ the military to fight and win wars if the individual soldier had to fend for himself on those things.

  101. GMC70
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 4:32 pm | Permalink

    As we talk about what reforms ought to be entered into by the next administration, a thought about what works:

    http://tcsdaily.com/article.aspx?id=020108A

    Highlights:

    “Clearly, there are many opponents to reform – such as populist media, special interests and within the civil service. And reforms usually have a short-term cost, but larger long-term gains.

    Reforming successfully usually demands that political leaders have the ability to stand up for what they know to be right and endure criticism in the short term. Indeed, that is what Ronald Reagan once did – and he was both re-elected and praised afterwards. In the current race for Presidential nominations in the US, there is much talk about change. But how much substance and determination is actually behind the words?

    Every industrialised country in the world has launched free-market reforms during the past two to three decades. About a dozen of these countries have reformed substantially in a number of areas. The United States is one of these. But other countries have achieved more in areas where the US still has a lot do to. And the economic and social results from the reforms have often far exceeded expectations.”

    discuss . . .

  102. Max
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 4:33 pm | Permalink

    Chas.
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 4:26 pm | Permalink
    Why not invent some more Hillary Lies Max?? You do it so well!! Better yet, go READ Hillary’s proposals for Health Care, and you might actually, *gasp* LEARN a few things!! LOL
    —————————————————

    Chas, I simply pasted directly from Hillary’s plan, you goofball! Go read!

    http://www.hillaryclinton.com/files/pdf/healthcarecosts.pdf

    o Obesity intervention: If obesity among the elderly were to return to the level in the
    1980s, then savings could total a trillion dollars over a 25 year period.xlv

  103. Nathan
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 4:36 pm | Permalink

    CapnAmerica and Chas,

    The Military also forces height/weight standards on it’s members too.

    If you do not maintain your weight you will be kicked out.

    The Military also forces physical fitness standards on people too.

    If you do not maintain your physical fitness you can be kicked out.

    Are you willing to place those same standards on your government mandated “free” or “affordable” health care?

  104. Max
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 4:37 pm | Permalink

    Maybe just maybe, that’s what Hillary has in mind!

    Forcing height and weight standards on The People to reduce health care costs.

    Forced fat marches?

    Fat camps?

  105. Posted February 1, 2008 at 4:38 pm | Permalink

    So Max, do you have some problem with that statement??

    “o Obesity intervention: If obesity among the elderly were to return to the level in the
    1980s, then savings could total a trillion dollars over a 25 year period.xlv”

  106. ANTI J R
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 4:39 pm | Permalink

    who is James?

  107. Posted February 1, 2008 at 4:39 pm | Permalink

    Do you have a similar gripe about government intervention with tobacco users?? Huh???

  108. CapnAmerica
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 4:40 pm | Permalink

    Max–

    You provided not a single iota of evidence to back up what you said in your last post.

    Don’t embarass yourself further.

    You are not arguing against me. You’re arguing against financial genius Warren Buffet.

    http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/money/tax/article1996735.ece

    “I pay less [of my income in] taxes than my secretary,” says Buffet.

  109. Max
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 4:41 pm | Permalink

    Interesting article GMC.

    As Europe moves away from Socialist policies, America is moving in the opposite direction.

    In traveling in Eastern Europe in particular, I have witnessed first hand, the improvements they are making to their economies as they transition away from Government controlled economies to free market economies.

    For the first time in history, Europe is moving forward while America moves backward.

  110. Max
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 4:42 pm | Permalink

    Chas.
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 4:38 pm | Permalink
    So Max, do you have some problem with that statement??

    “o Obesity intervention: If obesity among the elderly were to return to the level in the
    1980s, then savings could total a trillion dollars over a 25 year period.xlv”
    ———————————————–

    I may have a problem with this approach, depending on how Hillary intends to ENFORCE it!

  111. Posted February 1, 2008 at 4:43 pm | Permalink

    CapN — That ANTI JR could be any of a number of posters on this Blog that like to belittle JR, or take stupid pot shots at him… Those folks would be very numerous indeed!!

  112. CapnAmerica
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 4:44 pm | Permalink

    The article to which Max refers has no specifics whatsoever.

    The fact remains that the countries with the highest standard of living (look it up, I’m tired of posting it) have the highest levels of taxation and gov’t services.

    Think Switzerland, not Somalia.

  113. Posted February 1, 2008 at 4:44 pm | Permalink

    As opposed to what Max?? The NEJM, or AMA, or CDC??

  114. Max
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 4:44 pm | Permalink

    Yup Capn,

    Buffet, Heinz-Kerry, and several billionairs escape Federal taxes by maintaining tax-free investments in municipal bonds or offshore.

    Who doesn’t know that?

    That doesn’t change the overall truth to the facts posted above from the IRS data.

    Always, always, always, in 200,000 million individuals you will find extraneous data to pick apart.

    And Capn, just keep pickin that flyshit outta that pepper.

  115. Max
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 4:45 pm | Permalink

    Ummm, a little typo:

    200 Million or 200,000,000.

  116. CapnAmerica
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 4:46 pm | Permalink

    Nathan–

    Height-weight standards are wholly irrelevent.

    The fact remains that if you want cradle-to-grave socialism, join the US Armed Forces.

    GI, after all, stands for “government issue.”

  117. fleettwood
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 4:46 pm | Permalink

    “The government forces us to pay for Nathan’s healthcare and everything else whether we want to or not.”

    chas– Is this the “truth” you speak of.
    Like it or not, he speaks the truth of how Libs believe. The famous quote, “I loathe the military”, is the truth as you people see it.

  118. Max
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 4:49 pm | Permalink

    Look Chas, one last attempt to get thru to you.

    That $1 Trillion in savings Hillary writes about in her plan, comes from reducing obesity to 1980 levels.

    Now, either Hillary has to Enforce that obesity reduction OR she has to add that $1 Trillion back into her cost calculations for HillaryCare.

    So Chas, if you don’t lose that beer gut, you could cost America an additional $1 Trillion for HillaryCare!.

    And Hillary will have to raise taxes and or HillaryCare! premiums by $1 Trillion more so then she plans to raise taxes already.

  119. Nathan
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 4:50 pm | Permalink

    CapnAmerica,

    Your definition of socialism and the actual definition of socialism are apparently two different things.

    Because the military doesn’t offer you cradle to grave socialism.

    Then again, you and I have had several discussions on the military and every time you continue to show your ignorance.

  120. CapnAmerica
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 4:51 pm | Permalink

    Max–

    Offshore tax shelters have nothing to do with it.

    The fact is . . . sheesh, why do I even bother . . . that when one adds Social Security tax which is capped to income tax, it totals to a higher percentage of income than what the rich pay.

    You do see what I’m saying, right?

    I mean you’re not stupid, right?

    It’s not something one can have “an opinion” on.

  121. CapnAmerica
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 4:54 pm | Permalink

    They most certainly do.

    If you’re born to a military family, you get everything I just talked about.

    If you get into a military college, they pay full tuition, pay for your uniforms, your computer, your haircuts, plus they give you a stipend.

    It comes to over a quarter MILLION DOLLARS to put an officer through West Point for example.

    Your evidence so far, Nathan, consists of “no it’s not socialism.”

    If that’s all the better you can do, just quit now, while you’re behind.

  122. Tara
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 4:57 pm | Permalink

    James-
    I haven’t forgotten, just partied a little too much last night :) I’m going to read everything from that thread tonight.

  123. CapnAmerica
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 4:58 pm | Permalink

    Fleetwood–

    The government takes from me and you to pay for the military.

    That’s socialism.

    It has nothing to do with whether we love them or loathe them.

    Personally, I’ve been supporting more pay and benefits for soldiers. But it’s hard to get the money away from no bid contractors like Cheney’s former company Halliburton and into the hands of the actual people who serve . . .

    Thanks to Worst.
    President.
    Ever.

  124. CapnAmerica
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 4:59 pm | Permalink

    Oh, and the people who support Worst. President. Ever.

    People like you Fleetttwoood.

    Worst.
    American.
    Ever.

  125. Nathan
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 5:02 pm | Permalink

    CapnAmerica,

    What does the cost of sending an officer through school have to do with it being socialism?

    Your statements saying it is socialism are hardly any better than mine saying it is not.

    So, once again, I ask you:

    What is your definition of socialism?

    Because, it is apparent, that you are not using the actual textbook definition so far.

  126. CapnAmerica
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 5:08 pm | Permalink

    http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/socialism

    From the Merriam Webster Dictionary, socialism 1: any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods.

    The government collects tax revenue and operates a collective for military workers, for their housing, food, clothes, medical care.

    People in the military often don’t own their own house, the gov’t provides you one. You don’t go to your doctor, the gov’t provides you one. You don’t drive to the battlefield or meetings in your car, the gov’t provides you transportation. You don’t cook your own meals, you eat in the mess hall. Etc. etc.

    The closest thing we have in this country to pure socialism.

  127. GMC70
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 5:12 pm | Permalink

    Capn, that is quite possible the dumbest thing I’ve seen you write – and that’s saying something.

    “eople in the military often don’t own their own house, the gov’t provides you one. You don’t go to your doctor, the gov’t provides you one. You don’t drive to the battlefield or meetings in your car, the gov’t provides you transportation. You don’t cook your own meals, you eat in the mess hall. Etc. etc.

    The closest thing we have in this country to pure socialism.”

    It’s called PAY. and BENEFITS. for SERVICES RENDERED.

    Numbnuts.

  128. Nathan
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 5:19 pm | Permalink

    CapnAmerica,

    The Military is a system which operates from capitalism.

    It doesn’t own it’s own food production either.

    Just the other day you were trying to say that Haliburton (KBR) operated all the food for over 700 bases, which you were incorrect in saying.

    Now you are trying to argue it is socialism.

    So which is it CapnAmerica?

    One day you are crying about all the capitilism in the military and the next you are calling them socialist.

    By the way, things start to get different in pay and housing when you are married with kids and live off base.

    All of a sudden, you are merely getting paid for your services and you provide your own food and housing.

    You are an ignorant fool CapnAmerica, when it comes to the military.

  129. Posted February 1, 2008 at 5:20 pm | Permalink

    Ironic CapN… The Priesthood of the Catholic Church is much the same… Only it doesnt come from TAX dollars… But, the benefits are extremely similar!! :-)

    Nathan, I am sure you have health care coverage as a member of the Reserves… it might not be at the same level, when you are not in active duty status… but I am SURE you have coverage —

    MY coverage comes as part of my compensation package as well… but it comes from the private sector, and not from TAX dollars!!

    If you arent covered by a “socialistic type” of program, then at least it is TAX supported!
    ========================

    And Fleet… I would suggest you NOT put me in the Loathe Em section of liberals… I do not Loathe the Military… I dont like some of the policies made FOR them by Presidents, and Legislators… But I do NOT Loathe the Military…

    And as CapN pointed out, I also advocate for the best of equipment, etc., for our troops to do the job they have chosen to do!! If they dont have the best equipment, then ALL of us are at fault for that, in one way or another…

  130. Nathan
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 5:23 pm | Permalink

    Chas,

    Since you are so sure that I am covered, I would like to know where you are getting your information so that I can look into it and begin utilizing that coverage.

    So…

    What makes you so sure that I am covered???

  131. Posted February 1, 2008 at 5:26 pm | Permalink

    My goodness, how touchy, Nathan…

    When military folks have families, they are still provided with a housing allowance of sorts… it might not pay the entire bill, but it is an Allowance?? Didnt they use to call it BAQ or some such thing??

    And as for the capitalistic ventures?? I guess you could call it that, IF Haliburton had to bid on their contracts, like other private sector business establishments do… But with No-Bid contracts??? THAT is where the socialistic “type” of system comes into play…

    Now, let’s see you try to weasel your way around that one??

  132. Posted February 1, 2008 at 5:28 pm | Permalink

    Stop LYING Nathan… it doesnt look good on your service record!! Everybody knows military gets health care coverage!!

    Besides, I’ve had too many military personnel in my family; and in my parishes… It is a well known FACT… I am not going to watch you spin on that one… not tonite… not any nite!!

  133. Taz
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 5:29 pm | Permalink

    Sorry, capn..you are dead wrong. I was born into a military family. My dad was serving active duty at the time. Your claim of “If you’re born to a military family, you get everything I just talked about.” is absolutely and completely wrong.

    Also…I suppose you are going to degrade the benefits my brother received in August. He was buried at government expense, complete with an honor guard after dying in August in Kabul.

    You make me sick, you ignorant punk. My brother did not “enjoy” the so called socialism. He was a volunteer, and he died violently.

    Take your ignorant, stupid comments and shove them where the sun doesn’t shine.

  134. Nathan
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 5:30 pm | Permalink

    Chas,

    There are hundreds of private contracts with local business, food providers, transportation, and many other things with the military.

    Why just focus on Haliburton?

    I don’t need to weasel my way around anything at all.

    I know all about BAQ and BAS. That is pay for services.

    Is it Socialism when you work for a company and then you use that money to buy your food and housing too?

  135. J R
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 5:31 pm | Permalink

    Well I see Kansas “Max” is messing with my nic again.

    “Max”? Kindly leave me out of your little thought experiments.

    Well if there is ANYTHING approaching socialism it would be the military draft.

    I mean what more can you demand of individual for society than ordering that individual into battle for a cause they likely have no stake in?

    It has been ever thus.

  136. Nathan
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 5:32 pm | Permalink

    Chas,

    I have been in the Marine Corps for 11 years, 4 years active and 7 Reserve.

    I am not lying about anything.

    I am given no Health Care coverage in the Reserves except for while I am actively serving or under orders.

    Right now, as we speak, I am given no health care by the military.

    How am I a liar?

  137. J R
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 5:33 pm | Permalink

    Nice story “Taz”. And you waited til now to tell it?

    I call bs.

  138. Posted February 1, 2008 at 5:33 pm | Permalink

    NO NATHAN… you ignorant runt… I dont WORK for the Federal Government… Of Course, it isnt socialism!! Good Lord, as KFG would say, ‘Jesus Wept!’

  139. Nathan
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 5:34 pm | Permalink

    Looks like Chas is in his melt down mode again.

    I wonder, do you speak to people in your church like this? Would they be surprised to see your attitude on this blog?

  140. Ben
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 5:37 pm | Permalink

    I don’t recall my reservist parents being covered either. Maybe when they were at ‘camp’ but not overall.

    Of course that was long ago – the 50s.

  141. Posted February 1, 2008 at 5:38 pm | Permalink

    I am assuming that your current health benefits are administered through the V A…. Nathan, an old buddy of mine died 18 months ago… He served for about 3 years back during the Nam Era… never saw combat… When he died, he was STILL getting Veterans benefits after all those years…

    PLUS, I know Air Force reserve folks who are getting health care benefits, whether on active duty or not… Now, are you saying that you somehow dont RATE as highly as they do?? Or do you just want us to feel sorry for you??

    And TAZ — I have two nieces on the East Coast who had FULL health coverage from my Bro. in law… who was RETIRED military… from WW II, Korea, and early Nam era…

    Bro in law, and sis, both had medical benefits up to the day Bro in law died!! Also had full Base privileges!!

    So, I have no clue what you are trying to say here!!

  142. Taz
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 5:38 pm | Permalink

    I don’t give a damn what you think, jr. I don’t use my brother’s death as a talking point.

  143. GMC70
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 5:39 pm | Permalink

    taz:

    My condolences – your brother died with honor, though some here are loathe to admit same. And don’t sweat JR – it’s easy to call “bs” behind the anonymity of a blog. As usual, he hasn’t a clue. The rest of us understand we have no reason to not take you at your word, especially on such a subject.

    Again, my condolences.

  144. Posted February 1, 2008 at 5:39 pm | Permalink

    Yep… now Nathan gets called out on something, and magically, my Parish is involved… Amazing!! My Parish has NOTHING to do with what I say or dont say on this Blog…. YOU GOT THAT JAR HEAD??? LEAVE MY PROFESSION OUT OF IT!! IDIOT!!

  145. Posted February 1, 2008 at 5:42 pm | Permalink

    To answer your question more directly…. Ummm… You might recall, Even Jesus called the hypocrites and liars “Sons of Snakes” and “Brood of Vipers” It’s Ok Nathan… it goes with the territory!! LOL

  146. Nathan
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 5:44 pm | Permalink

    Chas,

    How have I been called out?

    So far, you offer nothing but anecdotal evidence of some people you know being covered.

    I am telling you, as a SSGT in the Reseves, that I am given no health care coverage except for while I am actively serving or while I am under orders.

    The only exception I know of is that after being deployed, depending on the length of deployment, you will be covered for a bit of time.

    That time has expired for me.

    I don’t want you to feel sorry for me. CapnAmerica and you are claiming that I have my health care paid for.

    I was merely correcting you on that.

    And, for as long as you claim to be a Priest on this blog then I will call you on your obviously untasteful behavior every time.

    You don’t like it? Then don’t act like that.

  147. Posted February 1, 2008 at 5:45 pm | Permalink

    Now, Nathan… the original point here is that YOU have your health care benefits provided by TAX dollars… unlike most of us here… (if it is only when you are on duty, then so be it) TAX dollars provide your health care benefits… And yet, you would deny TAX dollars to be used to provide for the health care of others Less Fortunate… THAT is what I call Hypocrisy!! Nuff said!!

  148. Posted February 1, 2008 at 5:47 pm | Permalink

    Calling you what you are, sorry, is not untasteful!! Just factual!! Try again!! AND, I have NEVER claimed to be a Priest on this, or any other Blog!! Another ERROR on your part!!

  149. Nathan
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 5:53 pm | Permalink

    Chas,

    Do you concede that I am not a liar?

    I work for my health care benefits. It is not Hypocrisy for me to expect others to do the same.

  150. larry
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 5:57 pm | Permalink

    Socialism’s finest hour

    The president actually said today that it is the responsibility of our government to help pay the mortgages of those who can no longer pay for the loans they got for their homes. He almost had a tear in his eye …. brought a tear to mine too ..

    It’s the new “Red Book” by Chairman George — I am gonna default my next 2-3 payments on all the properties, will pass most of any savings to my renters (they will be happy, and three fourths are active duty families so they get a double whammy of socialism according to Capn) — kill a couple of birds with one stone — good for the economy, puts more of your money back into the economy maybe for more socialist programs. but y’all thanks for picking up the slack, come by have some breakfast at the club house some Sunday — hell ya paid for it ……

    Thanks Nanny George

  151. NN
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 6:10 pm | Permalink

    Max: I didn’t say we are a shining example, just pointed out a bit of eonomic history. The Good and Services Tax of 5% plus the Provicial Sales Tax (with of various rates across the country, ie. Alberta doesn’t have one) IS the Value Added Tax. We no longer tax at the point of manufacture but at the point of consumption or service rendered. Where the VAT helped is that service sectors like lawyers and accountants, hairdressers etc., now pay VAT whereas before they paid nothing,thereby spreading the tax burden across the total sector not just manufacturers. Manufacturers used to pay a tax of 12% which stiffled industry and inhibited investment. Have you looked at the two economies in the last 10-15 years? The basket case to the North seems to have straightened itself out, but I maintian that what worked here may not work for you. My previous post was a comment, not a lesson Max.

  152. ksgrm
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 6:18 pm | Permalink

    Nathan three things to know: Chas will never admit to being wrong. Chas will always assign himself a starring role in every discussion. Chas will scream at you in capital letters when you call him what he is.

    Don’t make the mistake I have and treat him like he has a brain.

    Obviously he can’t in his finite mind see that your employer is the government and the fact that they paid for you insurance is very different that paying for some bum who won’t get off his duff and find an employer to pay his benefits.

  153. Posted February 1, 2008 at 6:37 pm | Permalink

    Well, let’s see if I can make KsGrm to be the liar that she normally is…

    Nathan, can you show anywhere that I said you dont work for your health care benefits??

    Answer: NO — I didnt… So dont try to spin it… I only said where your Military Health benefits come from… TAX Dollars…

    I also did not say it was hypocrisy for you to say otherwise about others… So you can stop trying to spin that one too!!

    Sorry KsGrm… YOU are wrong again!!

    But do try again some time!!

  154. Nathan
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 6:38 pm | Permalink

    ksgrm,

    I know. I still remember the Social Security discussion where several posters were linking him directly to the web page which proved Chas to be wrong and he went on for more than a day still refusing to admit he was wrong.

    Even now, he will probably never admit he was wrong in calling me a liar.

    I would love to meat Chas in person. Not to intimidate him, just to see if he is any where close to being normal compared to his posting here.

  155. Posted February 1, 2008 at 6:40 pm | Permalink

    Oh one more thing, Grmmy… I did NOT say anything about FREE health care… I have been addressing the subject of AFFORDABLE health care… major difference there…

    Pack up your bum, and save him for another thread, ok?? READ upthread.. it is extremely clear that I have been talking about AFFORDABLE health care, Grmmy!! There’s that reading problem of yours again!! You really do need to do something about that some time!!

  156. Posted February 1, 2008 at 6:41 pm | Permalink

    BTW, I hear that the Evelyn Woods reading program can work wonders!! :-)

  157. Nathan
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 6:42 pm | Permalink

    Chas,

    This is what you said earlier:

    “And yet, you would deny TAX dollars to be used to provide for the health care of others Less Fortunate… THAT is what I call Hypocrisy!! Nuff said!!”

    Now you say this:

    “I also did not say it was hypocrisy for you to say otherwise about others… So you can stop trying to spin that one too!!”

    So who knows what you are trying to say.

    You say something in one post, deny it in another, then accuse us of spinning…

  158. Posted February 1, 2008 at 6:43 pm | Permalink

    Nathan, since I didnt call you a liar, what does that make YOU?? Huh??

  159. Posted February 1, 2008 at 6:44 pm | Permalink

    Thats simple Nathan… You have said many times that you dont want tax dollars to be used to provide health care for poor people… Simple enough, right??

  160. Nathan
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 6:45 pm | Permalink

    Chas,

    Right here:

    “Chas.
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 5:28 pm | Permalink
    Stop LYING Nathan… it doesnt look good on your service record!! Everybody knows military gets health care coverage!!”

  161. Nathan
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 6:46 pm | Permalink

    Round and round he goes, where Chas will stop, no one knows…

  162. Posted February 1, 2008 at 6:48 pm | Permalink

    Nathan said this: “I work for my health care benefits. It is not Hypocrisy for me to expect others to do the same.”

    To which I responded: “I also did not say it was hypocrisy for you to say otherwise about others… So you can stop trying to spin that one too!!”

    Thats pretty much of a direct response to what you said, Nathan… Now, if you cant SEE that, and you still want to spin some more, keep it up dizzy!! Youre doing fine!!

    Of course, thats your typical blog function.

  163. Posted February 1, 2008 at 6:51 pm | Permalink

    ooops correction thats not function… should be Malfunction!! sorry bout that!!

  164. Posted February 1, 2008 at 6:55 pm | Permalink

    Nathan, you first argued that you dont get any health covereage in the Reserves… But — you DO get coverage when you are on active duty, or under orders… So, I was right originally… YOU were the one who put a line of separation in what I posted!!

    Come, now, lets get things straight here… Do you think you might be able to handle that??

  165. Nathan
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 6:58 pm | Permalink

    Chas,

    I posted this much earlier than your post calling me a liar:

    “Nathan
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 4:32 pm | Permalink
    CapnAmerica and Chas,

    First, the Marine Corps doesn’t pay for my health care.

    I am in the Reserves. The only time I am covered is when I am at my drill weekend or I am under orders.

    Second, you could hardly call it socialist.

    Although “similar” you completely disregard the military’s mission and purpose by simply stating that it is socialism.

    When someone is in the military they are working for everything they get. They are paid less than their civilian counterparts because all those things like food, housing, and health care are taken into account.

    It would be a logistical nightmare to employ the military to fight and win wars if the individual soldier had to fend for himself on those things.”

  166. Nathan
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 6:59 pm | Permalink

    I made the distinction before you called me a liar.

    You then called me a liar.

    You then denied calling me a liar.

    Now you are the one trying to qualify calling me a liar after saying you didn’t call me one.

    Who is spinning now?

  167. Posted February 1, 2008 at 7:00 pm | Permalink

    So, find somewhere that I said the Marine Corps pays for your health coverage?? I merely said TAX Dollars… Again, YOU interjected the part about active duty, drill weekend, or under orders… And who pays that coverage when you ARE being covered?? TAX dollars!!

    Now, where did I say something not true??

  168. Posted February 1, 2008 at 7:02 pm | Permalink

    Nathan, you have the intelligence of a sand flea… The POINT is that your health care coverage is paid for by TAX dollars!!! I said you were LYING because you were trying to deny that simple fact!!

    So, just stuff it, ok??? I am not playing your “parse the word” game any more tonite…

    nuff said??

  169. Nathan
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 7:07 pm | Permalink

    Chas,

    You are the only one trying to play games.

    First you call me a liar, then deny it, then try to qualify it.

    Nitwit.

    Now you are back to calling me a liar again.

    So which is it?

  170. Posted February 1, 2008 at 7:12 pm | Permalink

    You decide… if you can!! LOL And stop LYING by calling me a priest while you are at it… Lying can be situational….

  171. Nathan
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 7:13 pm | Permalink

    Chas,

    Who knows what you are, you are so vague.

    It was not a lie, it was a mistake.

    One I can admit to making. So what exactly are you then if not a priest?

  172. Nathan
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 7:14 pm | Permalink

    Chas,

    My question is, are you still calling me a liar or not?

  173. Posted February 1, 2008 at 7:15 pm | Permalink

    Nathan, did you, or did you not say — that your health coverage is not provided by the Marine Corps??? Did I EVER say that it was?? I stated very straightforward: Your Health Coverage is provided by TAX Dollars!!

    You DID deny that your health coverage is provided by the Marine Corps, right?? Yet, your health coverage is provided by TAX dollars… And what is it that funds the Marine Corps??

  174. Posted February 1, 2008 at 7:16 pm | Permalink

    ALSO, please note, I am not assuming that you DO or DO NOT have other health coverage… That would be total speculation on my part…

  175. Posted February 1, 2008 at 7:18 pm | Permalink

    If you arent lying, then so be it… But, I think YOU are the one who can answer that question…

  176. Regular
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 7:23 pm | Permalink

    I see that Liberals without a cause or clue are posting tonight. :)

    CapnAmerica seems to think that married people that get military housing is a given. Actually, and especially in overseas countries that are family friendly, there is a long wait time to get into base housing. For instance, in Germany, the distance for off base available (private housing) might be anywhere from 5 to 40 miles away depending on the population of the area.

    If you live off base in privately owned, leased or rented houses, then one is paid a housing allowance. If you live on base, then you give up that allowance. By the way, housing allowance is not considered in re-enlistment pay, compensation or military retirement.

    Medical benefits are part of active duty benefits. What some people don’t understand is that one day you might be doing normal work, the next month or longer might be spent out in the field somewhere, living in the mud or in some third world country for even a longer stay.

    24/7 – there are no days off in the military – there are only normal duty schedules – mission always has priority.

    Medical benefits are provided for active duty military. However, retired military are charged a monthly charge through either Tricare or a per visit cost. Reservists do not get the same benefit, unless they are on active duty status. The guard is the same way.

    Dental insurance for retirees is paid for by Dental insurance as an option, not mandatory. In other words, if the service member doesn’t pay for the dental insurance, they get no co-pay support if they go to a dentist.

    If military service was easy, everyone would do it. It is often boring, but filled with moments of sheer terror. Not every one likes to have to get up at O dark thirty every morning and run six miles in formation as part of their daily routine. :)

    There are strict requirements for wearing the uniform, expected behavior requirements, your freedom is somewhat limited on what you do, say or act upon. You haven’t lived until you do so in a GM Medium tent with 20-30 other people and bathe in an outdoor, unheated shower for weeks at a time, drinking that chlorine tasting water out of water mule. :)

    “Duty-honor-country” are not just words, one lives it when they are in the military.

    Those who do not understand military service often smear it, abuse their roles by speaking out ignorance. Having Dad or Mom, Brother or Sister, being gone for weeks, months, years is often painful for the military member’s family as well.

    The legal code in the military is much different as well. One can get an Article 15 just for making an odd look at a superior. That jeer or sneer you do in civilian life just might get you some reduced pay or benefits, reduced rank or lead to expulsion from the military.

    There are no halfway measures when it comes to appearance, fitness and conduct. Either you are adhering or you are not.

    There are military regs for military regs. :)

    It’s a different life, some times enjoyable, but a lot of personal sacrifice. Some times that sacrifice includes life or limb.

    To mock the benefits that a military member gets is for the ignorant fool who does not understand what the military member gives up when they join the service.

    It is funny when one sees these programs and TV shows where they send people to “Boot Camp.” They think this is punishment. Military live it, love and do it 24-7. They walk the walk so that others may talk the talk.

  177. Nathan
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 7:28 pm | Permalink

    Chas,

    I have already stipulated several times now that my health care coverage (right now) is not paid for by Tax Dollars or the Marine Corps.

    Only while I am actively serving or I am under orders will the Marine Corps be paying for my health care.

    I said that BEFORE you called me a liar.

    I said that AFTER you called me a liar.

    I posted where I said that after you denied calling me a liar and claimed I only made the distinction after you called me a liar.

    I am through with this stupidity Chas. I have better things to do than play your assinine games.

    Good night. Whatever you claim to be or believe in it sure isn’t Christian.

  178. Posted February 1, 2008 at 7:33 pm | Permalink

    Nathan, thats ok… The way you act on this Blog, I am convinced that you arent much of a Christian yourself!! At least I know what I believe… And just because its different than YOU, you continue to say I am not a Christian… And, that, troll marine boy, is a VERY biased, bigoted, thing to say… Since you are defining MY Christian Faith, by YOUR limited understand of your OWN faith!! So, just STUFF IT Nathan!! Preferably where the Sun dont shine!!

  179. Posted February 1, 2008 at 7:36 pm | Permalink

    Furthermore, there is NOTHING RELIGIOUS or NON-RELIGIOUS about a discussion of Health Coverage… yours provided by TAX dollars… mine from private sector… So, WHY do you always want to attach something RELIGIOUS to every damned topic on this Blog??? Get over it, Nathan!! I quite frankly dont CARE what you do or do not think of my Christian Faith… Because, frankly, it isnt UP to you… no matter how much you want to pass judgment… it’s not YOUR judgment to pass…. Aint that neat???

  180. Wahawk
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 7:56 pm | Permalink

    Max,

    Very good posts on taxes and the truth of the matter as to what the rich pay vs the poor.

    The Libs who try to tie Social Security taxes into the picture are totally bastardizing the facts to slant to their view when they know, the Libs know, they are not paying their share of taxes.

    To bring in Social Security actually makes their case weaker. The rich pay more Social Security taxes and get less benefits then the poor.

    These Libs are truly sick people. Totally dependent on government and those who earn more then they do. Yet they cry that they are actually paying more somehow, which flies in the face of the facts.

    The dumbing down of America is complete for the Libs. Someone, the Conservatives I guess, must still do actual work in order to live and to support those who do not work or those who do not earn much at all.

  181. Wahawk
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 8:00 pm | Permalink

    1. CapnAmerica
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 4:44 pm | Permalink
    The article to which Max refers has no specifics whatsoever.

    The fact remains that the countries with the highest standard of living (look it up, I’m tired of posting it) have the highest levels of taxation and gov’t services.

    Think Switzerland, not Somalia.

    2. CapnAmerica
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 4:46 pm | Permalink
    Nathan–

    Height-weight standards are wholly irrelevent.

    The fact remains that if you want cradle-to-grave socialism, join the US Armed Forces.

    GI, after all, stands for “government issue.”

    Say Max,

    These two posts say all anyone needs to know about Capn. He obviously is very afraid of the IRS stats you posted. Capn calls the IRS stats lies and not very specific! Ha, ha! Did he not click on your link and even read the IRS stats? Of course not.

    Capn in post #2 degrades the American military calling them a bunch of Socialiststs!

    What more do you need to know about Capn character? Capn is a comic book character for sure.

  182. Posted February 1, 2008 at 8:05 pm | Permalink

    ALERT!! ALERT!!

    D
    N
    F
    T
    T’s

  183. Max
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 8:06 pm | Permalink

    Sorry JR, I apologize from the bottom of my heart.

    I didn’t mean to flatter you so much by saying you could possibly earn $25,000 in one year all by yourself.

    I hope you accept this apology in the spirity in which it was truly intended.

    And are you now able to provide health insurance for your own son? I hope so. In between blogging sessions during the day, you hopefully can find a job.

  184. Max
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 8:07 pm | Permalink

    Sorry JR, I apologize from the bottom of my heart.

    I didn’t mean to flatter you so much by saying you could possibly earn $25,000 in one year all by yourself.

    I hope you accept this apology in the spirity in which it was truly intended.

    And are you now able to provide health insurance for your own son? I hope so. In between blogging sessions during the day, you hopefully can find a job.

    Live long and prosper JR. And may you someday earn a whopping $25,000.

  185. Max
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 8:09 pm | Permalink

    J R
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 5:33 pm | Permalink
    Nice story “Taz”. And you waited til now to tell it?

    I call bs.

    ————————————————–

    To make sure all could see this cold, heartless, deadbeat S O B, for what he truly is.

  186. Max
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 8:16 pm | Permalink

    Nathan
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 6:38 pm | Permalink
    ksgrm,

    I know. I still remember the Social Security discussion where several posters were linking him directly to the web page which proved Chas to be wrong and he went on for more than a day still refusing to admit he was wrong.

    Even now, he will probably never admit he was wrong in calling me a liar.
    ———————————————

    Nathan, I recall this thread and it was clear that Chas as a counselor to widows and widowers had been giving incorrect advice to them about their Social Security survivor benefits.

    Hopefully by the time the widows and widowers got in touch with the Social Security Administration, our wonderful government workers there had more knowledge on this subject then Chas. Otherwise, they may have missed out on the Social Security benefits due to them, and sufferred financially as a result of the bad financial advice they received from Chas.

    I can’t recall the exact details, but perhaps you could refresh everyone, just to clear up the facts.

    Thanks Nathan.

  187. Max
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 8:18 pm | Permalink

    Chas.
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 8:05 pm | Permalink
    ALERT!! ALERT!!

    D
    N
    F
    T
    T’s

    And do NOT Trust Bad Financial Advisors!

  188. Political_mama
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 8:27 pm | Permalink

    WHY does the Government not pay for your healthcare Nathan? Or do you just LIKE buying private insurance?

    Makes no sense, all veterans get health benefits after they serve.

  189. Posted February 1, 2008 at 8:33 pm | Permalink

    Max says: “Nathan, I recall this thread and it was clear that Chas as a counselor to widows and widowers had been giving incorrect advice to them about their Social Security survivor benefits.”

    Once again, Max makes up facts where there are none… As VT pointed out, I was NOT giving erroneous information… merely incomplete information… What I said on this Blog was all true… just not complete, due to changes made in SS benefits that I was not aware of!!

    So, why dont you just lie some more Max… You are SO good at it!!

    You and Nathan both!!

  190. Regular
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 8:33 pm | Permalink

    Not quite Pmom,

    Veterans only get health benefits related to their service connection injuries if they are not retired.

    Sometimes it is broadly defined what service connected is, but that’s the general idea.

    If you do your 2,3 or 4 years and get out, you will receive no health care from the VA, unless it’s service connected.

  191. Posted February 1, 2008 at 8:34 pm | Permalink

    Of course, there is a possibility that you simply do NOT remember the thread accurately… That IS a viable possibility…

    Nawwwww you’re just in a mood to fabricate more lies… SNAFU

  192. Regular
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 8:38 pm | Permalink

    Don’t pop a vein Chas.

  193. Posted February 1, 2008 at 8:40 pm | Permalink

    Actually, James, there are LOTS of things you dont know that you continually LIE about here… I am sure you have great fun doing it… but it is SO dishonest of you, being a former military officer in our nations great military establishment!!

    So, just keep on LYING, and I will keep on reminding you of your LIES!! And you still cannot prove that Cosmos is not a scientist!! LOL And, you cant prove I am a non-minister either… Unfortunately for YOU, I CAN prove it, when I have to… which is like almost never!! And as for YOU, you dont deserve to have the proof… you lying POS!!

  194. Nathan
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 8:44 pm | Permalink

    Political Mama,

    VA health care is for those combat veterans with service related injuries.

    You don’t get free health care just for being a Veteran.

  195. Regular
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 8:44 pm | Permalink

    Let’s meet up Chas, I’ll show you my military ID card. :)

  196. cosmos
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 8:50 pm | Permalink

    “Duty-honor-country”.

    Regular posted May 26, 2007 at 12:34 pm
    http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/05/dont_count_on_f/#comment-239958

    The truth hurts when told, the Sierra Club screwed the Levees in New Orleans.

    The people who filed a lawsuit against the Corps disagree with JimmyMac — there’s no mention of the Sierra Club.

    But I guess lying = “honor”.

    ‘Judge tosses Katrina lawsuit against Engineer Corps’
    http://www.reuters.com/article/latestCrisis/idUSN30257740

  197. Nathan
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 8:51 pm | Permalink

    Max and Regular,

    Don’t bother trying to argue with Chas about it.

    It took over a day and who knows how many posts for him to finally admit he was wrong last time.

    Do you really want to go through that again just trying to get him to admit to that now?

    Not worth it.

  198. Posted February 1, 2008 at 9:03 pm | Permalink

    Nathan — once again — I was not WRONG on SS… so, why do you want to keep up your oerotative attack?? All Vaughn did was point out that the information I was providing was incomplete — not WRONG — incomplete!!

    So, Nathan why do you and Max want to keep on LYING?? Does it make you feel all full of testosterone?? All Macho?? You guys really got issues!!

  199. Posted February 1, 2008 at 9:04 pm | Permalink

    oerotative = perjorative

  200. Posted February 1, 2008 at 9:10 pm | Permalink

    Nathan writes >>>

    “You don’t get free health care just for being a Veteran.”

    OK, Mr. Know It All… My Dad had NO service related injuries… NONE… So, why did he get Veterans Benefits at the Bob Dole VA Center, on East Kellogg?? He had FREE Dr. appts. and got lowered fees on all Rx’s… NO Service related injuries!!

    My good friend from High School Days served approximately 3 years during the NAM Era… never saw combat… no service related injuries… Got ALL of his meds at the Bob Dole VA Center on East Kellogg…

    In fact, he died there as a Patient… less than two years ago….

    Now, you want to tell us all about that AGAIN?? Or do you want to call me a Liar??

  201. Nathan
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 9:19 pm | Permalink

    Chas,

    Sorry, I don’t deal in anecdotal stories.

    I deal in reality. Actually, if I remember correctly you were saying the same thing in that Social Security discussion, that you knew someone who didn’t get the benefits, thus we were wrong.

    Sorry, that is not how things work.

    The VA offers many services to Veterans and you can go there to utilize some of them.

    There is a world of difference in getting some benefits and health care.

    Go to the website, see for youself:

    http://www.va.gov/healtheligibility/

  202. J R
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 9:25 pm | Permalink

    Only person blogs all day and night is JamesJMRepublicankhan McClure.

    Isn’t that right James?

    And the schtick about health care for my son. That pops up in the Dallas character posters, “Regular” and now “Max”

    Til I see evidence otherwise, Taz and Max are just other incarnations of crazy ol’ James JM.

    And if I’m wrong? Blame him.

  203. The Phantom
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 9:47 pm | Permalink

    Nathan, all Veterans are entitled to free health care at the VA, and if they don’t have the resources on site they will send the vet out to other Dr.’s and hospitals, there doesn’t have to be any service connected injury or disability.

  204. The Phantom
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 9:49 pm | Permalink

    Regular, you’r wrong. I know of an istance in which the ‘vet’ hadn’t even completed boot camp, but was discharged and receiving VA care, because the discharge was not dishonorable.

  205. J R
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 9:55 pm | Permalink

    I’ve posted elsewhere that we could deal with two problems at one time.

    We have insufficient care for our veterans and servicepeople. We have a problem with affordable health care.

    Now many, maybe most physical ailments don’t need a Doctor. They could be dealt with by a good medic or EMS trained person.

    Why not have clinics staffed with personnel trained in basic care? That would serve our veterans AND the uninsured poor.

    Certainly there is no lack of volunteerism in our country. Every time I have been in a private, for profit hospital, I have seen unpaid volunteers. And we are about to have a FLOOD of older folks who I think would be eager to give back.

    Now it WILL take a change in attitude. We will have to change the view that even basic care is a for profit enterprise. But we can better use the resources we have to care for our veterans AND our uninsured.

  206. Posted February 1, 2008 at 9:57 pm | Permalink

    Nathan wont accept anecdotal stories unless they are his or his dad’s… BTW, Anecdotal stories do not include stories that are about family members, and friends you ACTUALLY know!! Thats just one of your myriad of Ad Hominem attack tricks, Nathan… So, either accept it, or keep on being a less than honorable liar!! What I posted about my Father and my good friend (whose funeral service I conducted in Kingman) are TRUE stories… I have NO reason to make them up!! Get over it with your objection to anecdotal stories…

    Mine are just as valid as the ones George Bush spins in the SOTU speech… I bet you didnt challenge those… LOL

  207. The Phantom
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 9:57 pm | Permalink

    I’m thinking they changed the law to include ng and reservist who have had duty in the mid-east. Trying to beef up the incentives to recruit more.

  208. Nathan
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 10:05 pm | Permalink

    The Phantom,

    The actual process involves applications and assignment to a priority group. Those veterans with combat related injuries being the highest priority.

    Most Veterans, like myself, who are just fine, don’t have any injuries and work in the private sector don’t get free VA health care.

    You have to qualify for it.

    I have no idea about Chas father or friend or their special circumstances. I do know, that you don’t just get free VA health care just because you are a Veteran.

  209. Posted February 1, 2008 at 10:11 pm | Permalink

    What I posted about my friend, and my Dad is totally true… No fancy applications… No waiting periods… Just Health Care at the WICHITA VA center!! Just like I posted!!

    Maybe you havent check the fine print lately, Nathan!! Maybe what you are posting is just like what I posted about Soc. Sec. Not WRONG… but perhaps a little incomplete!!

  210. ksgrm
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 10:13 pm | Permalink

    Well as the wife of a navy vet I can tell you he doesn’t get free healthcare at the VA center. He does see a doctor there but it is paid for by our private insurance.

    Unless a condition is service related or you are indigent you don’t qualify for free care at the VA.

    By the way Chas the SS argument was over you calling me a liar for saying that the husband could draw benefits from their wifes work experience. They would be paid the greater of 1/2 of their wifes benefits or the benefit earned on their own work history – whichever was greater.

    Just keep on spinning.

  211. Regular
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 10:16 pm | Permalink

    #
    The Phantom
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 9:49 pm | Permalink

    Regular, you’r wrong. I know of an istance in which the ‘vet’ hadn’t even completed boot camp, but was discharged and receiving VA care, because the discharge was not dishonorable.
    ——————–
    Then he committed fraud Phantom. The law says you must have 180 days military service to be considered a veteran of the armed forces.

    If he was injured during basic, then he would receive care for those injuries, otherwise no.

  212. ksgrm
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 10:19 pm | Permalink

    Phantom there has been a recent (last 5 yers) change concerning those vets who served during war time. All applicants are now means tested and then assigned a level of benefit available. If you have you own insurance you can go to the VA center but payment is your responsibility.

    If you served during war time – whether you were actually involved in the fighting or not you are moved up a notch. This was to help with the agent orange, gulf war syndrome, etc.. Situations that come from wars.

    That has been our experience anyway.

  213. Posted February 1, 2008 at 10:21 pm | Permalink

    Right Wench… And Vaughn enlightened us by saying that what I had said was TRUE… until they made the changes… Changes that I was unaware of… No spin there… Just facts, ma’am…. I didnt hurt ANY of my parishoners… since I always told them whatever they did, to check the Social Security Office… Which I ALSO posted!! Read it and weep, there, Wench!! Vaughn clarified very plainly that I had not advised anybody incorrectly… just incomplete…

    I THANKED Vaughn for his clarification… YOU ALL decided to keep on spinning, and lying about what I had said!! And you are STILL doing it!!

    By the way, my DAD got FREE health care, and he hadnt been in the Army since 1945!!

    He got lowered Rx prices… and saw a VA doctor every 3 months… NO cost to HIM, OR to his medical insurance…

    The same situation applied to my old high school friend… who DIED at the Dole VA Center following two surgeries in which they tried their damndest to save his life!!

    Now, you still want to argue the point??

    My Dad had health insurance… My friend had NONE… Go figure!! Somewhere out there is the solution to this rather strange dilemma!!

    Somebody more enlightened than all of us will no doubt come along with the explanation!! All I KNOW IS what happened… Cause I was there to see it happen!!

  214. J R
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 10:21 pm | Permalink

    Ya know Chas?

    I get the feeling it is just you, me, Nathan, and “Regular” posting here since 10:05.

  215. Posted February 1, 2008 at 10:24 pm | Permalink

    Well, Phantom, they are still calling us liars… what to do; what to do?? I propose we just call it a night!! I’m not going to sit here and be called a liar, when I know darned well what happened to my Dad, and my old high school buddy, whom I visited when he was a patient… and who I conducted a funeral service for, out in Kingman!!

    So, I am just going to call it a night on this matter… and hope that somebody will come along with the explanation….

  216. Regular
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 10:25 pm | Permalink

    Chas, if your friend or relative had any percentage of disability, they can go to the VA center and get care. That’s probably why they got care.

    I go to McConnell or get referrals from there. I don’t particularly like the VA hospital.

  217. Posted February 1, 2008 at 10:25 pm | Permalink

    Could be JR… Dont forget Phantom, though

  218. Nathan
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 10:29 pm | Permalink

    Chas,

    You are forgetting that I posted the page of the Social Security Administrations website which showed you were wrong at least 10 times over the period of an entire day.

    You kept denying it the entire time. You kept refuting the webpage from the Social Security Administration!

    Only over a day later, when it was so obvious that you were wrong because everyone was telling you so and it was shown to you countless times, did you finally admit you were wrong.

  219. Nathan
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 10:32 pm | Permalink

    Chas,

    I have already posted the VA websites page on eligability.

    Foor goodness sake man, read it.

    There is nothing there which says, just because you are a veteran, that you get free health care.

    No one is calling you liar, you probably just have no idea what you are talking about like usual.

  220. ksgrm
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 10:33 pm | Permalink

    Even now Chas look up the date you think this law was changed. It has been on the books my entire working life and from what you posted the other day in the 80’s you were still a beginning worker almost a babe in arms.

    Let me know that date.

  221. ksgrm
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 10:33 pm | Permalink

    It’s been a good day. Time to call it a night.

  222. Regular
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 10:34 pm | Permalink

    From the VA Website:

    * Were a reservist who was called to Active Duty and who completed the term for which you were called, and who was granted an other than dishonorable discharge, or
    * Were a National Guard member who was called to Active Duty by federal executive order, and who completed the term for which you were called, and who was granted an other than dishonorable discharge, or
    * Only request a benefit for or in connection with:
    o a service-connected condition or disability; or
    o treatment and/or counseling of sexual trauma that occurred while on active military service; or
    o treatment of conditions related to ionizing radiation; or
    o head or neck cancer related to nose or throat radium treatment while in the military.
    * Were discharged or released from active duty for a hardship , or
    * Were discharged with an “early out”; or
    * Were discharged or released from active duty for a disability that began in the service or got worse because of the service; or
    * Have been determined by VA to have compensable service-connected conditions; or
    * Were discharged for a reason other than disability, but you had a medical condition at the time that
    o Was disabling, and
    o In the opinion of a doctor, would have justified a discharge for disability (in this last case, the disability must be documented in service records)

  223. Posted February 1, 2008 at 10:40 pm | Permalink

    Sure Nathan… Like I wasnt there with BOTH of these folks… One was my FATHER, you little freak… I took him there!! The other was my old friend from high school days… He did have a disability… non service related… like James says of his… It was minor… not VA eligible… And Nathan, my father died 40 years after WW II!! Geez!!

    YES, Nathan, like it or not, I DO know whast I am talking about…

    BTW, on that Soc. Sec. issue… I knew what I was talking about then, too!! What I said was TRUE… because I was involved with the particular case… VAUGHN came forward and POSTED that I was not wrong… just didnt have complete information!!

    Did you forget that point of clarification??

    And WHY would I admit I was wrong about something, that I KNEW I was not wrong about?? That would have been totally WRONG!!

    I was satisfied with VAUGHN’s clarification… Too bad it didnt satisfy you, since you are STILL LYING about what happened!! Arent you just the proud little Marine for that?? Eh, Nathan??

    And NOW, you do the same thing here… Look, it happened… I dont know HOW it happened… but it happened!! Apparently it has happened to at LEAST one other poster besides me… Doesnt that tell you ANYTHING Marine boy??? TWO posters tell you the same thing…. but NOOOOO YOU have to be right, and throw your Ad Hominem CRAP around the Blog, just as usual!!

    Like I said, I am satisfied to wait for somebody who has knowledge of the FACTS to clear up the dilemma… So sorry if that isnt good enough for YOU!!

  224. Nathan
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 10:44 pm | Permalink

    LOL

    Chas, you are the typical overreactionary and emotional leftwing nitwit.

    You cry like a baby when anyone disagrees with you.

    Boo Hoo.

    It isn’t enough that we have posted the VA websites information here for you.

    Nope, you still sit here clinging to your story.

    If you can’t read the VA website or simply refuse to, then exactly who is this person you will listen to who you are waiting to hear from?

    I have never seen such willful ignorance before.

  225. CapnAmerica
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 10:46 pm | Permalink

    Thanks for proving my point, Regular.

    The specifics you provide are just more evidence on the main idea–cradle-to-grave socialism.

    Housing allowances, medical care, uniforms, haircuts, food cooked by others and all paid for by the US taxpayer.

    Yup, that’s what I’m talking about.

    It’s not a smear, it’s not slander, it’s just the way it is.

  226. Posted February 1, 2008 at 10:46 pm | Permalink

    ksgrm
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 10:33 pm | Permalink
    Even now Chas look up the date you think this law was changed. It has been on the books my entire working life and from what you posted the other day in the 80’s you were still a beginning worker almost a babe in arms.

    Let me know that date.
    =====================================

    What the sam hill are you tallking about??? Dont know how to tell you this, but in the early 80’s I was 30+ yrs old… Clergy dont normally finish all of their schooling until around age 26 or 27…. So, as I said then, I was in the first five years of Ordained service… Hardly a babe in arms, you idiotic Wench!!

    Furthermore, what my age in the 80’s has to do with ANYTHING being discussed here, is totally bogus!!! Youre nucking futs, woman!!

  227. Posted February 1, 2008 at 10:49 pm | Permalink

    I’m sorry Nathan — Not one damned thing you or Regular posted from the supposed VA web sites have anything at all to do with either one of the two situations I described… And yet YOU still sit here calling me a Liar, among your other normal Ad Hominem attacks!!

    YOU have no knowledge of what I am talking about.. But You sure think you know everything there is to know on the matter!!

    You are impudent, arrogant, and self-righteous… As far as I am concerned, I dont much care what rank you have as a U. S. Marine, YOU HAVE NO CREDIBILITY!!

  228. Regular
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 10:53 pm | Permalink

    CapnAmerica
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 10:46 pm | Permalink

    Thanks for proving my point, Regular.

    The specifics you provide are just more evidence on the main idea–cradle-to-grave socialism.

    Housing allowances, medical care, uniforms, haircuts, food cooked by others and all paid for by the US taxpayer.

    Yup, that’s what I’m talking about.

    It’s not a smear, it’s not slander, it’s just the way it is
    ———————–

    All you have to do is sign up CapnAmerica.

    Housing Allowance comes and goes. If there are restrictions for living off base, you can’t get housing allowance. If there is no room on the base, you get housing allowance.

    Haircuts are paid out of your own pocket.

    Not everyone gets free food in the Military. Officers and Warrant officers must pay a surcharge if they eat at dining halls. Most people do not eat at dining halls unless they have to or are lower enlisted who can’t afford to eat anywhere else.

    People who don’t retire from the military don’t get any benefits other than VA benefits passed by Congress.

    Sure it was a slam CapnAmerica, you don’t appreciate anyone that has served or anything that the military has done.

    That’s fine, we protect commie jerks like you anyway.

  229. Nathan
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 10:54 pm | Permalink

    Chas,

    I didn’t call you a liar. Actually, I specifically said that already.

    I simply said you probably don’t know the circumstances for how those people you know were given the care they received.

    There is nothing “supposed” about the website I posted.

    It is the .gov website. Dear Lord man…

    But keep on crying, you are good at that.

  230. Posted February 1, 2008 at 10:54 pm | Permalink

    NATHAN — I am certain that somebody will step up like Vaughn did on the Soc. Sec. matter, and provide a point of clarification, that will quite likely explain the dilemma… And that will, or should be, the end of it…

    But, on the other hand, if you do the same thing with that as you did with the Soc. Sec. matter, you are STILL calling me a liar, and trying to demean my professional advice to MY parishoners…

    Why??? I dont know, since I ALWAYS tell folks in that situation to be sure they contact a Soc. Sec. Admin. counselor!! Now, would you like to venture a guess as to WHY that would be the wrong thing to do???

    Nathan, there are millions of things in this world that simply dont have a right and a wrong, or a black and white, answer…

    You and all the rest of us are seeing such things right here on the Blog!!

    This sort of thing happens all through the reality of Life!!

  231. Regular
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 10:54 pm | Permalink

    You’re not a liar Chas.

    You’re just a bull shit artist :)

  232. Posted February 1, 2008 at 10:56 pm | Permalink

    Naathan writes:

    “It isn’t enough that we have posted the VA websites information here for you.

    Nope, you still sit here clinging to your story.”
    =============================

    You say you arent calling me a LIAR??? You have a new definition for that now too??? Read it and weep, idiot!!

  233. Posted February 1, 2008 at 10:58 pm | Permalink

    Now, Regular, that is something you should know the exact definition of… since you are such a PRO at it!!

    Show me any bullshit I have posted here tonite, troll boy…. It isnt there, you dumb A$$

  234. CapnAmerica
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 10:59 pm | Permalink

    Wow. I wish I could get housing, clothes, medical care VA benefits, subsidized liquor and food all paid by the taxpayer.

    But if I didn’t get FREE HAIRCUTS, okay, it’s not socialism.

    :roll:

  235. Posted February 1, 2008 at 10:59 pm | Permalink

    Well, time for meds and fruit… then time for bed…

    Good night; Good luck;
    God bless; whatever you conceive God to be!

    Blessings All!!

  236. Regular
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 11:01 pm | Permalink

    All you had to do CapnAmerica is sign up.

    And as I said about the food, not all get free food, only those usually living in the barracks or dormitories as they call them now. :D

  237. CapnAmerica
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 11:02 pm | Permalink

    BTW, wasn’t yesterday the day that no one was going to be able to post unless they registered according to Regular.

    What do they call it again when people post things as true that they can’t know is true?

    Seems like the word is on the tip of my . . .

    Starts with an “L”

    I remember now.

    LIE

  238. Regular
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 11:04 pm | Permalink

    That’s the old Capn, change the subject, avoid the truth.

  239. Regular
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 11:05 pm | Permalink

    Capn joining the military, his answer:

    bawk bawk bawk bawk

    bawk bawk bawk bawk

  240. CapnAmerica
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 11:07 pm | Permalink

    I don’t take orders well.

    Not a good match.

    I also don’t get up early in the morning.

  241. CapnAmerica
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 11:08 pm | Permalink

    BTW, was the registration thing based on faulty evidence or no evidence?

    I’m guessing, no evidence.

  242. J R
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 11:09 pm | Permalink

    Ya know James?

    You lie about everything else. You even have a puppet nic posting about a lost brother in Afghanistan. Conveniently dropped in as a talking point.

    This makes me doubt you ever served at all.

    Seeing as how your service in the military seems to evolve according to the topic.

    I STILL remember that bit about “Iraqi missile parts flying past you”

    I don’t think you served at all.

  243. Posted February 1, 2008 at 11:10 pm | Permalink

    Yea, right CapN, not to mention Regular’s daily lies.
    “Cosmos is not a scientist” and

    “Chas is a non-minister”

    I like that one about Chas., since I know Chas, and have seen him at work. By the way, folks, Chas has the rank of a Bishop, but he doesnt like to make that a commonly known thing.

    But when one of you numb nuts know it all types posts that Chas is a non-minister, you might just as well post on here that Regular is a phony soldier, or Nathan is a traitor. It has the same amount of “truth” ya know?

    And as for Cosmos, Regular has no knowledge of whether Cosmos is, or is not a scientist! So, he should just shut up about that too!

    Some of you people are just despicable!

  244. Posted February 1, 2008 at 11:13 pm | Permalink

    Now, I wish I would not have gotten up for hot cocoa. Oh well, I will just have to be half awake at the Ground Hog breakfast tomorrow morning in Dodge City. Oh well, good night folks! Just thought I would check in on the Blog before I head west for a few weeks.

    Nite nite!

  245. CapnAmerica
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 11:13 pm | Permalink

    Interesting thesis, JR.

    I think he did serve, but he tends to (remember GW in his debate with Kerry?) exaggerate.

  246. Regular
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 11:15 pm | Permalink

    I have a brother in Afghanistan? Since I don’t have any brothers, there might be a problem with that. :)

    sugar aka Chas – coming back to add to the bull shit pile.

  247. CapnAmerica
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 11:16 pm | Permalink

    I talked to Chas f2f on two occasions and both times he was wearing a clerical collar.

    But you’re right, Sugar, I did not know he is a bishop.

    Does that mean he can only travel on diagonals?

    Sorry, just got done with three games of computer chess.

  248. Nathan
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 11:18 pm | Permalink

    Sugar,

    I don’t doubt that Chas is some member of some church as a minister or whatever he calls himself.

    Just not a Christian.

  249. Posted February 1, 2008 at 11:18 pm | Permalink

    Another LIE Regular! AGAIN!

    Gotcha! You have been told numerous times,

    I am sugar. Thats my real name. I am not
    Chas. You are just a numb nuts liar! How many times do you have to be told? Why are you so obsessed with it anyway?

    I’m outta here! What a bunch of looney tunes!

    You all have fun in your world of delusions!

  250. Posted February 1, 2008 at 11:20 pm | Permalink

    Oh, isnt that nice of you Nathan. And you have some divine dispensation that you can make such a Lie about another professing Christian? How nice of you, to have such delusions of grandeur!

    Why dont you just take your Lie and shove it?

  251. Regular
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 11:21 pm | Permalink

    I’ve been told what Chas/Sugar? What lie was it you are referring to.

    Sugar is your real name? What’s your last name?

    “coated?”

  252. CapnAmerica
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 11:21 pm | Permalink

    BTW, Regular, what did you think was going to happen when you said that everybody would have to start posting after the last day of January and then we don’t?

    What did you think would happen when you said, “I’ll never post again after New Year’s Day” and then you did?

    At least your old lies (”I’m going to Mississippi” “I have a old, black granny”) weren’t so transparently lies.

    You’d think with all that practice, you’d be getting better not worse at lying.

  253. larry
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 11:21 pm | Permalink

    Nathan

    You say you’re a Marine, yet you’ve been posting here on the same topic bitching about the same thing to the same people — since around what 330 – isn’t it a rule of some sort that when you have declared victory in a battle (sounds like you have several times here tonight) and proved your overwhelming superiority you withdraw and celebrate your win — oh I guess not the way GWB does it …

    Hey JARHEAD is on HBO go salivate “Get aome Marine — get some…” welcome to the suck ……..

  254. Posted February 1, 2008 at 11:21 pm | Permalink

    Nathan, from the way you attack other people, while pretending to be such a heroic marine, just maybe you are a traitor, you think?

  255. J R
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 11:21 pm | Permalink

    This is what you wanted isn’t it James?

    Live with the result.

    I think ksgrm is another of your incarnations.

    And where IS “American way”?

    See what you wanted was no relevance as to nics.

    To protect your insanity?

    What you have produced is assumation that any poster on your side could be you. Any troll is you too.

    You wanted to destroy the blog. You said so.

    You only served to marginalize any legitimate poster who might agree with you.

    Well done!

  256. Nathan
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 11:21 pm | Permalink

    Sugar,

    Just as JR has his little feelings that everyone is actualy Regular, I have mine that you are Chas.

  257. CapnAmerica
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 11:23 pm | Permalink

    Sugar–

    Remember the verse, “Vengance is mine, saith the Lord.”

    Chas will be a ministering angel when Nathan lies howling . . .

  258. Nathan
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 11:24 pm | Permalink

    LOL

    Larry, I am watching Jarhead right now.

    I am installing the OS and a bunch of software on a friends computer for him tonight. That is why I am sitting here surfing the net too.

  259. Regular
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 11:24 pm | Permalink

    Wow, I’m ksgrm now according to JR. Talk about your delusional people.

    No, I confess – I’m really CapnAmerica and you’ve been had JR. :D

  260. Posted February 1, 2008 at 11:25 pm | Permalink

    Why, Regular, you who has a meltdown if somebody posts your name on the Blog, and you have the unmitigated gall to ask me what my last name is?

    What kind of an Asshole are you?

    Well, you know what? I am going to tell you what my last name is. And it isnt coated!

    But, if I post my last name on this Blog, you will stop Lying about me and Chas being the same. If you dont, I will prove that you are a phony soldier, just as JR claims.

    Deal?

  261. CapnAmerica
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 11:26 pm | Permalink

    Larry–

    Nathan is the kind of marine who TALKS the enemy to death . . .

  262. Posted February 1, 2008 at 11:27 pm | Permalink

    Hey, CapN, Troll Alert!

  263. CapnAmerica
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 11:28 pm | Permalink

    ROFL!

    “Regular, what kind of an assh*le are you?”

    The assh*le forever kind, Sugar.

  264. J R
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 11:30 pm | Permalink

    Well,

    Me I don’t deal in duplicity. And no one can accuse me of it credibly.

    Now I have met Nathan. And I have met Capn. And I have met Chas.

    Now I’ve not met James Regular JM and I don’t want to. This means I likely won’t meet “Max”, “American way”, or “ksgrm”.

    But I am just dealing with the blog that James McCluer is trying to make.

  265. CapnAmerica
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 11:31 pm | Permalink

    Sugar’s last name is “Cane.”

    Just like Marlyn Monroe’s character in Some Like It Hot, one of the funniest movies ever made.

  266. Regular
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 11:34 pm | Permalink

    Go ahead Sugar/Chas give your last name.

    I might know some one who knows you.

  267. larry
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 11:35 pm | Permalink

    well cap’n sounds pretty smart — saves bullets —- think of how much less this war would have cost if we could a talked our way out of it

  268. larry
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 11:35 pm | Permalink

    ….. instead of in to it ..

  269. CapnAmerica
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 11:36 pm | Permalink

    JR–

    It’s almost certain that JM is Right Angle. It’s likely he’s Wahawk and American Way (when AmWay claimed he “had a staff,” he made a pure JMism).

    I think it virtually impossible that he’s Max (”socialism! socialism! also communism!”) or Ksgrm. They don’t write like JM, even though many of their ideas overlap.

    But you are correct that because JM has lied so much in the past, his protestations mean nothing.

  270. Regular
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 11:38 pm | Permalink

    Actually, I was first astronaut on the moon.

    Who do you think took that photo of Neil Armstrong stepping off the lunar module. :D

  271. Posted February 1, 2008 at 11:39 pm | Permalink

    Ok, James. You are a sexually perverted Asshole, among other things. Stop your Effin lying now, and I might not pursue legal actions against your sexual inuendo.

    I am not Chas. I am Sugar. Last name is
    Schach. My parents are from Netherlands. I was born here, in eastern Colorado. My dad worked on a sugar beet farm, as an administrator.

    I have never been to Netherlands. Just heard many stories.

    Now, you will stop your effin lying about Chas. A man who has the rank of Bishop does not deserve the demeaning attitude you express here.

    I dont share his faith, but he has helped me on several occasions. And I do not sleep with men, James. Nuff said!

  272. J R
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 11:42 pm | Permalink

    Well however it plays out it is only destructive to the right Capn. And my take is that is a good thing.

    Me I regard as credible only the right wing nics I have met in person. Again, James McCluer did that.

  273. CapnAmerica
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 11:43 pm | Permalink

    Don’t let THE TROLL goad you into giving any personal information that you don’t want to.

    THE TROLL known as Regular is now googling your name to find out if I can find out more about you.

    It’s probably harmless but given that THE TROLL seems to have a fairly tenuous hold on reality, you might not want to give him anything more . . .

  274. Regular
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 11:45 pm | Permalink

    You blog from eastern Colorado? Why do you blog here?

    And what the heck does an administrator do on a sugar beet farm? Count beets?

  275. Regular
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 11:49 pm | Permalink

    Schach is actually German, it means “chess.”

    I do recall that Chas/Sugar stating he had German ancestry as well.

  276. Posted February 1, 2008 at 11:49 pm | Permalink

    No more Troll — I Blog from wherever I am. I have ties to Wichita, so I keep up. As for you, you lying asshole, you get nothing more from me. You have all you are going to get.

    You are capable of finding out everything else. Go look up what a sugar beet farm is, and what it does. I will tell you nothing more.

    Now, I really have to get some sleep.

    nite nite

  277. CapnAmerica
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 11:50 pm | Permalink

    They deal with the gov’t paperwork generated by the industrial hygiene bean-counters . . .

  278. Posted February 1, 2008 at 11:51 pm | Permalink

    Oh, so now you are trying to tell me what country my parents are from? You are one unbelievable piece of crap, James! My family is Dutch. Not German. And I know Chas’s background story, and you are barking up a wrong tree there, you stupid ass!

  279. Regular
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 11:53 pm | Permalink

    What part of the Netherlands? You can smoke weed there legally you know.

    How would you meet Chas/Sugar if you don’t live here?

  280. CapnAmerica
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 11:53 pm | Permalink

    Regular “knows” that Schach means chess in German because he went to Babelfish in typed it in . . .

    If he had a real background in linguistics and languages, he would know that people often shorten their names or change the spelling when they move to another country.

    Not only that, not every last name translates into a word in one’s native language. For instance, Baker does. McCluer does not.

  281. Regular
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 11:55 pm | Permalink

    I was thinking about sending off for “Bishop” diplomas from the Cayman Islands. Maybe a PhD in Astro Turfing as well. :)

  282. CapnAmerica
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 11:55 pm | Permalink

    Although, I pretty sure that McClure in the original Gaelic meant son of a “cluer” or son of someone looking for a clue.

  283. Regular
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 11:55 pm | Permalink

    Call me Sugar, we can talk. :)

  284. Posted February 1, 2008 at 11:57 pm | Permalink

    Where did you get the false idea that I met Chas in Wichita? You are so phony, if it wasnt so damned sad, it might be funny! But, if you dont stop spinning, you will get dizzy, and fall off of your chair, and you wont be able to get up!

    Dont worry. I wont waste any phone time calling you. After all, anybody who saw that phony poster put up your name on the Blog has your phone number.

  285. Regular
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 11:59 pm | Permalink

    “Clure” means fist in Scot Gaelic.

  286. Regular
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 12:00 am | Permalink

    Have the poster who put up my name call me then. You seem to know him/her and didn’t turn him in.

    Perhaps you’re just too scared to call me, I understand Sugar/Chas.

  287. CapnAmerica
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 12:02 am | Permalink

    Sugar–

    Regular is the Blog equivalent of the old guy who lives in a cardboard box and hits people up for quarters so he can buy cheap wine.

    Screaming at him actually encourages him.

    It’s the only human interaction he gets . . .

  288. Posted February 2, 2008 at 12:02 am | Permalink

    There are no such things as Bishop diplomas, you stupid fruit cake. It isnt a degree. It is a title. Go ahead, and get your PhD in astroturfing. It would be as phony as the rest of your alleged degrees. So far, you have totally struck out – just go to bed, James.

    Hey everybody, James really is as stupid, and dumb as he seems to be. He is a total fake! And he doesnt know half of what he claims. It’s all a computer trick. He has many resources, and can lift information on any topic of his choosing. But he is a fake! And a Phony, and a Liar!

  289. Regular
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 12:03 am | Permalink

    Don’t pop a vein Sugar/Chas.

    Remember, you are in Lent now, you should keep your promise. :)

  290. J R
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 12:04 am | Permalink

    There is a dynamic that works between Chas and Sugar and “Regular” and all his nics and Capn.

    I don’t pretend to understand it. Frankly I am sick of it.

    Fight all night amongst yourselves whoever you are. I am sick of trying to figure it out.

  291. Regular
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 12:04 am | Permalink

    Astroturfing is a neologism for formal public relations campaigns in politics and advertising that seek to create the impression of being spontaneous, grassroots behavior, hence the reference to the artificial grass AstroTurf, initially developed for the Houston Astrodome.

    The goal of such a campaign is to disguise the efforts of a political or commercial entity as an independent public reaction to some political entity—a politician, political group, product, service or event. Astroturfers attempt to orchestrate the actions of apparently diverse and geographically distributed individuals, by both overt (”outreach,” “awareness,” etc.) and covert (disinformation) means. Astroturfing may be undertaken by anything from an individual pushing their own personal agenda through to highly organized professional groups with financial backing from large corporations, non-profits, or activist organizations.

    :D

  292. CapnAmerica
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 12:06 am | Permalink

    Interest, Clure means fist.

    Because the profane word for sexual intercourse, “f*ck” is thought to have it’s roots in the word for fist.

    Using Grimm’s Law, f corresponds to the Latin p (Like fish is to pisces). CK corresponds to the Latin GH.

    Pugh or fist as in pugalism.

    So we could call you Mr. McF*ck.

    Perfect.

  293. Regular
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 12:07 am | Permalink

    Actually the word you mentioned has Germanic origins.

    Ficken Ge-(root word)

  294. Posted February 2, 2008 at 12:07 am | Permalink

    I dont know that phony poster any more than you do, James. But, anybody who can read, knows what was posted. Besides, I dont waste phone time talking to phony people, and fakes, and liars.

    You keep lying every time you post my name with Chas. You have been told you are totally wrong, and yet you persist. You are truly an idiot, and a total asshole! You have zero credibility.

    Now, maybe you have had your day full of jollies. I am going back to bed. My ride is picking me up at 6 a.m., for a Ground Hog breakfast in Dodge City.

    I might check back here, to see if you are still lying about me being Chas. If you are, I will need to contact the Blog Editors, and see what legal options are available.

    If you think I wont, you are really dumb!

  295. Regular
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 12:09 am | Permalink

    Okay Sugar, say hi to Chas when you’re in Dodge City.

  296. CapnAmerica
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 12:09 am | Permalink

    Lent doesn’t start until Ash Wednesday which is Feb. 6.

    And here’s where THE TROLL plagiarised his definition of “astroturf.”

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astroturfing

  297. Regular
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 12:10 am | Permalink

    Yeah Sugar/Chas – contact the Eagle about the legal options you have being called Sugar/Chas.

    You do that.

  298. CapnAmerica
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 12:11 am | Permalink

    The roots of “f*ck” are disputed but the most commonly accepted theory is that it is not Anglo-Saxon but Dutch word.

  299. MonkeyHawk
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 12:12 am | Permalink

    Despite all evidence to the contrary, I prefer to approach WE Blog with the assumption that each and every nic is a unique and special person; many of them crazed beyond all understand. But special.

    And these little pissing matches between nics, real and imagined, tend to bore me.

    Y’know, sometimes this forum offers a discussion of issues and points-of-view. But, since reality has a liberal bias, Cons prefer to derail issue-related discussions and suck people into sock-puppet accusations and personal whining (re: “Nathan”) about hurt feelings.

    There are many issues and point of view that are worthy of rational, adult discussion and debate. Then the sock-puppets (or not) show up and troll the entire thread toward isults (real and imagined).

    If there are any legitimate contributors to this forum, please try to refrain from personal attacks. (I realize I’m almost as guilty, since I think “Nathan” and “outlander” and “Max” and “Econ101″ and “GMC70″ and “ksgrm” might be separate and unique individuals, wacky as they are. But I’m really trying to address their arguments on the basis of the stuff “they” post, rather than conjure up psychological profiles.

    A lot of the time, my posts are ignored because, perhaps, I’m not in on the game. Perhaps all these posters are sock-puppets. I dunno. And I don’t care.

    Frankly, I don’t think you could invent a “Nathan.” He’s so over-the-edge, no one would believe him if some fiction-writer made him up. And if I allowed myself to wonder too much about it, I’d guess “J R” isn’t really the self-professed liberal s/he attempts to portray him/herself to be. “Max” is anybody’s guess.

    And *who* they are really doesn’t matter. In a forum such as this *what* they say is what matters. Except when they’re talking among themselves about who they may or may not be.

    If you have an issue or an argument or a point-of-view and have something to contribute to understanding or clarifying an issue, solid. Share your thoughts with us.

    But when you lower yourselves into fantasies and sock-puppets and personal rivalries, nothing worthwhile results.

  300. Posted February 2, 2008 at 12:13 am | Permalink

    Regular writes:

    “Remember, you are in Lent now, you should keep your promise.”

    James, I am not in Lent, as I do not observe it. Chas most likely will. But, to show your huge amount of stupidity, Lent does not begin until February 6. It is a day called Ash Wednesday.

    Still the continuous lying POS as usual!

  301. Posted February 2, 2008 at 12:18 am | Permalink

    So Sorry Monkey Hawk. I aactually agree with you, but whenever I show up, I have to go through all of this bull shit about being somebody else! Tonight, it has gotten the best of me. I am fed up with James/Regular/etc. But I do not know how to get rid of him and his constant badgering, and lying. Perhaps you have some suggestions?

    Thank you, and I am sorry!

  302. Regular
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 12:18 am | Permalink

    Oh, well my bad, I figured that Sugar/Chas would know when Lent was as he is a Bishop. Good thing he fell for my little date trap and corrected me. :)

  303. Regular
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 12:21 am | Permalink

    Oh, I forgot to put the source for AstroTurfing. It’s wikipedia. :D

  304. J R
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 12:24 am | Permalink

    And I was going to bed.

    Convenient you show up “Monkeyhawk”

    Given your recent posts, I’ll place you on the “cannot confirm” list too.

    I’ve been posting here more than two years and you speculate as to my gender?

    You also never addressed your attacks on my friend who I have met kfg.

    The blog has gone totally Xfiles. Only mostly I know who I can trust.

  305. Posted February 2, 2008 at 12:25 am | Permalink

    James, READ idiot! I do not do Lent. I am sure Chas will. Any dummy knows when Lent starts! I do Mardi Gras for the Party thing. I also know that when Mardi Gras ends, Lent starts! It doesnt take a clergyman to know that. Besides, you dumb fart, it is on nearly every calendar! How stupid can you get, James!

    You think you are so smucking fart, why dont you gather up all of your intelligence, and sit on it. It might actually absorb into your worthless body, and you might get to learn something! Truth is, you are nothing! You are nobody! And you are a lying piece of Crap!

  306. Regular
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 12:26 am | Permalink

    I see that vein bulging Sugar/Chas. It’s about ready to pop.

  307. cosmos
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 12:29 am | Permalink

    JimmyMac,

    So you finished your research, and paper, showing that E.G. Beck was correct, and global CO2 levels were above 400 ppm in the 1940’s…?

    Which science journal will publish it? Are they impressed by your old IH degree?

  308. Regular
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 12:32 am | Permalink

    I can go air sample right away cosmos and get a ground level reading of 400ppm co2 and it won’t be around any civilization or volcanoes. :)

    The same could be done in the 1940s.

  309. MonkeyHawk
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 12:38 am | Permalink

    “sugar” –

    Just try to not let it get under your skin.

    All those nics and potential sock-puppets really don’t matter when they get into personal attacks and flames.

    Yeah, it’s hard to avoid sometimes. And I am not without sin.

    But if you talk about relevant issues on these kinds of forums (fora?) you’ll learn to live with all the trolls ignoring your legitimate arguments and the issues at hand might be legitimately discussed.

    I’ve offered many comments to WE Blog which have been ignored. Maybe it’s because my perfect logic has quashed any rebuttal. I dunno.

    I’ve entered into dialogs with certain rightist advocates that have resulted in them retiring from the field. No big deal.

    But I’ve tried to make my posts and arguments issue-related. And I’ve dealt with posters such as “Nathan” and “Econ101″ and “GMC70″ and “Max” on-topic as best as I can. They can’t seem to deal with most of my on-topic arguments.

    I suspect, “sugar,” you’re a real and unique person and not a sock-puppet for “Chas,” or “Capn America,” or “ksfarmgrrl,” or anyone else. I suspect any number of WE Blog posters are sock-puppets of… well, you know who.

    It just doesn’t matter. I refuse to get caught up in the on-line or off-line personalities that reveal themselves on this forum. I’d rather discuss the ideas and concepts and philosophies involved.

    But too often, when I address the ideas or concepts or philosophies involved, someone attacks someone else as being “non-Christian” or something.

  310. ken
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 12:40 am | Permalink

    Saw the Wichita Community Theater Production of “The Diviner” tonight —— will just say that the audience was stunned …… many with tears in their eyes …. it was that good, several rose to give a standing ovation, those that didn’t I think were frozen by the performance.

    I think a reviewer might say

    “WCT staged a classic of “The Diviner” with a cast that almost made the simple, minimal well lit set not necessary —- from beginning to end, with each character getting emotionally closer and closer to the audience with a charm and humor and warmth that hypnotized the audience. They played the audience like a drum, the humor was spot on and the pathos and drame were haunting … a must see of the local theater season. ”

    Tickets 12$, small venue runs weekends through the 16th — may be crowded / sold out

  311. Tara
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 12:40 am | Permalink

    OK James,
    I skimmed over all that stuff and here is what i have to say.

    I don’t understand a damn thing about it. I think the only C’s I ever got in my undergraduate career were Organic Chemistry I and Organic Chemistry II. This stuff is greek to me, sorry and was so boring as hell that I couldn’t read it for longer than 15 minutes. When I’m reading stuff for an evolution thread, I can make myself do the extra work and put in the extra time to read and interpret everything, but I just can’t get myself motivated for this stuff.

    Sorry :( So I probably won’t be participating in the fine details of the GW debates, but for the record I don’t think it can hurt to reduce, reuse and recycle whenever.

  312. cosmos
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 12:53 am | Permalink

    JimmyMac posted February 2, 2008 at 12:32 am

    The same could be done in the 1940s.

    And which science journal is publishing your paper showing that?

    Were they impressed by your decades old IH degree?

    Like Ben said, many, many months ago… E. G. Beck’s CO2 claims are bogus!

  313. cosmos
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 12:59 am | Permalink

    Tara,

    There is no valid explanation for the wild CO2 changes that Beck (and JimmyMac) claims happened.

    The natural carbon cycle causes the small yearly ’sawtooths’ on the graphs here.
    http://cdiac.ornl.gov/trends/co2/contents.htm

    The yearly seasonal changes are larger at northern latitudes, such as Barrow, due to more land area in the NH.

    The gradual, longer-term rise is caused by human-added CO2.

  314. Tara
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 1:13 am | Permalink

    Also, from reading over the last 10-15 posts of this thread, you’re all idiots.

    I mean that in the most loving and affectionate way, of course.

    Here’s an experiment, just for a day. Ignore the bait. Both sides, James, Nathan, JR, Chas, cosmos, whoever. Anytime a personal attack is issued, IGNORE IT. Let’s see what happens? It could be interesting.

  315. cosmos
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 1:32 am | Permalink

    Tara,

    Are you also calling all of the scientists (see link in my 12:59 am post) who do global CO2 level measurements “idiots”?

    JimmyMac,

    Since you have(sic!!) shown that global CO2 levels were above 400 ppm in the 1940’s…

    Please post, for the plaintiffs in the New Orleans levees failure lawsuit, your Congressional and Justice Dept. links re the Sierra Club.
    http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/02/open-thread-21-2/#comment-286021

  316. Regular
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 2:59 am | Permalink

    cosmos,

    Which would result in higher co2 readers?

    Daytime
    or
    Nighttime

    ?

    :)

    Oh, and tell us why.

  317. Regular
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 3:00 am | Permalink

    readers = readings

  318. Regular
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 3:02 am | Permalink

    cosmos,

    Which would give a higher temperature reading?

    Daytime

    or

    Nighttime

    ???

    :)

    And tell us why?

  319. MonkeyHawk
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 12:33 pm | Permalink

    Yesterday’s news about America’s “Well Regulated Militia”

    TX: Tiffany Michelle Johnston, the wife of a jail escapee who shot at two law enforcement officials, was sentenced to eight years in prison for giving him a gun after picking him up.
    CA: Geraldine Meyers, a fitness trainer who doused her ex-boyfriend with pepper spray before and after shooting him twice in the back of the head was convicted of second-degree murder –public defender argued that Meyers was a battered woman who shot Warren in self defense after years of physical and emotional abuse.
    IA: Spencer police said that a man wanted in Wyoming for sexual abuse of a minor in Wyoming apparently shot himself to death after police standoff.
    WI: Jordan Wegner, 18, took his sleeping pills, then later woke up confused and in pain after he apparently shot himself in the knee — he doesn’t remember getting the rifle or using it.
    NC: Officer Jeffrey Wheaton was cleared of charges after he shot and killed an unarmed teenager, LaQuan Hykeem Davon Brown, 16-years-old after he thought the teen pointed a gun at him.
    OR: A Derringer pistol fell off a microwave, hit the kitchen counter and discharged, striking Marilyn Louise Lakin, 68, in the right shoulder and right side of her face.
    GA: Two off-duty police officers, Fulton officer Paul Phillips, 37, and Duluth officer Jay Daily, 42, wounded each other during an exchange of gunfire, both recovering from non-life-threatening injuries.
    CA: Police arrest 3 people after a 16-year-old was shot as he walked along a quiet residential street.
    PA: Two suspects are in custody in fatal shooting of 12-year-old Jolesa Barber and wounded her mother Kimberly Wade, 42 — the 2 suspects fired at least 40 rounds at residence.
    OH: Police Say Store Owner Killed With Own Gun In Struggle

  320. Posted February 2, 2008 at 1:23 pm | Permalink

    Regular
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 12:09 am | Permalink
    Okay Sugar, say hi to Chas when you’re in Dodge City.
    ============================

    Regular, what a dumb Mutha___ you are! Chas isnt in Dodge City! And nobody here said he is, except for your lying A$$!

    When are you going to stop Lying, James? Eveybody here knows you do it. You arent fooling anybody! The only problem is that not very many on here want to take the time or energy to challenge your constant Lies!

  321. Ben
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 1:35 pm | Permalink

    If I collect an air sample downwind from a power plant I will get CO2 amounts NOT representative of global figures. Remember, the power plant effluent has 10,000-20,000 ppm CO2. So, just a couple % of that in my smaple would increase my reading by 200-400 ppm.

  322. Posted February 2, 2008 at 1:40 pm | Permalink

    Please note Posting TIMES

    CapnAmerica Posted February 2, 2008 at 12:09 am | Permalink
    Lent doesn’t start until Ash Wednesday which is Feb. 6.
    ===========================

    sugar Posted February 2, 2008 at 12:13 am | Permalink
    Regular writes:

    “Remember, you are in Lent now, you should keep your promise.”

    James, I am not in Lent, as I do not observe it. Chas most likely will. But, to show your huge amount of stupidity, Lent does not begin until February 6. It is a day called Ash Wednesday.

    Still the continuous lying POS as usual!
    ===========================================

    Regular Posted February 2, 2008 at 12:18 am | Permalink
    Oh, well my bad, I figured that Sugar/Chas would know when Lent was as he is a Bishop. Good thing he fell for my little date trap and corrected me.
    ====================================

    Please note, James, et al, that CapN posted the proper date for Lent Before I posted it.

    As I said before, nearly all calendars have Ash Wednesday printed on them.

    Guess you lose again, James/Regular/et al!

    You just cant lie you way out anymore! But do keep trolling away! Some day, soon, more of the WE Bloggers could begin to call you out as a Liar just like I have done.

    And oh, Why do you keep lying and posting that Cosmos is not a scientist, even when you have no proof to back up your lying claim? And you do it nearly every day! If Cosmos wasnt attempting to be a nice person, Cosmos would clean your clock, you Effin Liar!

    Go back under your bridge, you lying phony soldier, troll boy! I am outta here!

  323. Ben
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 1:47 pm | Permalink

    Heck – even I know that Lent starts this Wednesday (right after Fat Tuesday) and I’m not even Catholic!

  324. Posted February 2, 2008 at 1:51 pm | Permalink

    Oh, Nathan —

    I STILL have never said on the Blog that I am a Priest!!

    And, for the record, I am also not sugar, no matter how much you want it to be true, it isnt!!

    So, if you keep saying it, you will be a liar!

    And not that it matters, but I am also a Christian… Live with it, Nathan! You dont get to write that definition, no matter how God-like you feel because of your exaggerated Ego!

  325. Posted February 2, 2008 at 1:53 pm | Permalink

    Hey, I’m not a Catholic either, Ben, and I will be officiating at an Ash Wednesday Service Wednesday evening. The day after Pancake Day at Liberal! LOL Otherwise known as Shrove Tuesday!

  326. Regular
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 1:53 pm | Permalink

    Melt down alert! Sugar/Chas melting…

    They’re melting…

    melting…

  327. cosmos
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 1:55 pm | Permalink

    Ben,

    They’ve also done good CO2 measurements on tall towers. Interesting graphs for season, hour, and elevation of measurements.

    ‘CCGG Tall Tower Measurements’
    http://www.cmdl.noaa.gov/ccgg/diurnal.html

  328. Ben
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 1:56 pm | Permalink

    I remember the year when the Priests from the Newman Center set up a portable alter at the base of Janss Steps at UCLA to give ashes – never bothered to get any sort of permit. I was chatting with one of them when we saw a campus cop coming over. Priest figured he was probably in trouble … no, the cop kneeled and got his ashes. Made perfect sense to me.

  329. Ben
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 1:57 pm | Permalink

    Yep cosmos – looks about what would be expected.

    If you look at Antarctic measurements you see the annual (seasonal) variation subdued and reversed. As expected.

  330. Posted February 2, 2008 at 1:58 pm | Permalink

    Alert!! Alert!!

    Lying Troll Boy is prowling the Blog!!

    Alert!! Alert!!

  331. Regular
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 1:59 pm | Permalink

    No one answered my questions! :)

    co2 levels in forested areas such as jungles can be extremely high during the night.

    Of course, the daytime temperatures are usually hotter because of (wait for it)

    the sun. :)

  332. Regular
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 2:03 pm | Permalink

    That’s why you always check the wind direction and speed, record it before you take samples Ben. :)

    …trunks full of manometers, analyzers of all types, manometer calibration equipment, filters, and the all important ice chest. :)

  333. Posted February 2, 2008 at 2:04 pm | Permalink

    James, I first met Sugar about 11 years ago. She was a young, scared, teenaged run-away. Lots of problems. I got her a couple of hot meals; talked things over with her; got her a bus ticket from the Clergy Alliance; called her parents, and sent her home. She has kept in touch with me over the years. Mostly on the computer.

    To have YOU make a mockery of that on this Blog is disgusting, and despicable. Your sexual inuendo from last night that I read here makes you not just disgusting, and despicable, but also sexually perverted as well!

    So, you had best stop your damned LYING about this girl, if you know what is good for your lying butt!!!

  334. Posted February 2, 2008 at 2:05 pm | Permalink

    Be sure not to mention that your questions were most likely totally irrelevant — Right James?

  335. Tap Herroni
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 2:09 pm | Permalink

    sugar
    Posted February 1, 2008 at 11:10 pm | Permalink
    Yea, right CapN, not to mention Regular’s daily lies.
    “Cosmos is not a scientist” and

    “Chas is a non-minister”

    I like that one about Chas., since I know Chas, and have seen him at work. By the way, folks, Chas has the rank of a Bishop, but he doesnt like to make that a commonly known thing.

    >Oh, he must be a Grand Wizard then.

  336. Ben
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 2:10 pm | Permalink

    So what regular. Your observations, though true, are irrelevant to the global issues. And yes, I know all about such sampling – I have done a lot of it over the years.

  337. Posted February 2, 2008 at 2:10 pm | Permalink

    Ooops, James.. I’m sorry — I amnot a scientist. I retract that statement. I will wait for a scientist to make that comment! LOL

  338. Ben
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 2:12 pm | Permalink

    I am not a minister. But, I AM a scientist.

  339. CapnAmerica
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 2:15 pm | Permalink

    That’s what they do, Chas.

    Especially JM.

    He takes any personal information and uses it in the most harrassing, irritating manner possible to ensure a response.

    The best thing to do is to give him no response.

    But if he keeps picking on vulnerable girls, we can always bring back the JM squad . . .

  340. Posted February 2, 2008 at 2:16 pm | Permalink

    Oh, gee, MORE lies from Pat Herron!! Lying worthless troll — just like James!

  341. CapnAmerica
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 2:17 pm | Permalink

    If your parents were well-off, like mine were, Chas, then I’m “a spoiled rich kid who never had to work for anything.”

    If your having tough economic times, then you’re “an unemployed loser.”

    See how it works?

  342. Posted February 2, 2008 at 2:18 pm | Permalink

    Yea, CapN — The JM squad might be one possible answer to this irritating, barely legal CRAP!!

  343. cosmos
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 2:18 pm | Permalink

    See graph,

    ‘CCGG Tall Tower Measurements’
    http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/diurnal.html
    Diurnal cycles of CO2 (medians by hour) for each measurement level on the North Carolina (NC) and Wisconsin (WI) towers for January and July.

  344. Posted February 2, 2008 at 2:19 pm | Permalink

    Right CapN… They sound a lot like paid Shills from the RNC, or from OR, or Troy Boy’s team!! LOL

  345. Tap Herroni
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 2:22 pm | Permalink

    sugar
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 12:25 am | Permalink
    James, READ idiot! I do not do Lent. I am sure Chas will. Any dummy knows when Lent starts! I do Mardi Gras for the Party thing. I also know that when Mardi Gras ends, Lent starts! It doesnt take a clergyman to know that. Besides, you dumb fart, it is on nearly every calendar! How stupid can you get, James!

    You think you are so smucking fart, why dont you gather up all of your intelligence, and sit on it. It might actually absorb into your worthless body, and you might get to learn something! Truth is, you are nothing! You are nobody! And you are a lying piece of Crap!

    >Sure sounds like Chas.

    Smucking fart. Didn’t Chas say something almost as stupid as this the other day?

  346. Posted February 2, 2008 at 2:23 pm | Permalink

    Thats what bothers James the most — He knows NOTHING about me — So, he LIES to make up garbage —

    What bothers me is that people dont call him on his countless/numerous LIES!!

  347. Posted February 2, 2008 at 2:24 pm | Permalink

    No, Pat Herron, I did not say anything like that the other day, you lying idiot!!

  348. Posted February 2, 2008 at 2:25 pm | Permalink

    Now, Pat Herron, if the shoe fits, then you should by all means, wear it!!

    Cut and paste all day if you want, Pat Herron — You are still a lying numb nuts idiot!

  349. cosmos
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 2:28 pm | Permalink

    Ben,

    Re CO2 seasonal and latitudes, graphs at Mauna Loa, Barrow Alaska, and Bering Head, New Zealand.

    http://rabett.blogspot.com/2006/10/hmm.html

  350. Tap Herroni
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 2:32 pm | Permalink

    That’s it Chas!

    Nucking Futs!

    Sugar writes just like you do!

  351. CapnAmerica
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 2:34 pm | Permalink

    Pat Herron–

    The guy who thought it was funny to call Obama a racial slur.

    But that’s the great thing about America, despite ignorant POS like you, Pat, the country can still become a better place.

    And Barack Obama is symbolic of that progress.

  352. Posted February 2, 2008 at 2:34 pm | Permalink

    The military backs Ron Paul more than any other candidate. Why are we not listening. Are you really supporting the troops and their decision?

    Here’s one (surely incomplete) puzzle piece from LRC:

    Paul: $286,764; 1349 donors
    McCain: $79,597; 413 donors
    Romney: $29,250; 140 donors
    Huckabee: $24,562; 94 donors

    Obama: $81,037; 466 donors
    Clinton: $49,523; 181 donors

    From an AP wire piece describing Paul’s top three donor categories:

    Members of the U.S. Army gave $34,987, students gave $33,566, and members of the U.S. Air Force gave $24,721.

    From another LRC article:

    Army:

    Ron Paul – 413 donations
    McCain – 141 donations
    Romney – 72 donations
    Huckabee – 42 donations

    Navy:

    Ron Paul – 242
    McCain – 185
    Romney – 22
    Huckabee – 33

    Marines:

    Ron Paul – 109
    McCain – 67
    Romney – 20
    Huckabee – 23

    Air Force:

    Ron Paul – 137
    McCain – 69
    Romney – 10
    Huckabee – 40

    Coast Guard:

    Ron Paul – 30
    McCain – 4
    Romney – 1
    Huckabee – 3

    Total Military Member Donations:

    Ron Paul – 931
    McCain – 466
    Romney – 125
    Huckabee – 141

    Total Military Member Donations to McCain, Romney and Huckabee Donations Combined: 732

    Ron Paul Total Military Member Donations: 931

    http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/02/02/ron-pauls-military-fundraising-totals-republican-leaders-dont-really-support-the-troops/

  353. cosmos
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 2:35 pm | Permalink

    Ben,

    Even better… Barrow, Mauna Loa, Samoa, and South Pole CO2, all on same graph.

    http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/insitu.html

  354. CapnAmerica
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 2:36 pm | Permalink

    To clarify, I believe I was the first one to use “nucking futs” the other day.

    You’re getting your Lib posters confused.

    But then, confused you are . . .

  355. lindainks55
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 2:36 pm | Permalink

    Sol, When will we see evidence these many supporters and this great amount of money raised means anything?

  356. Posted February 2, 2008 at 2:40 pm | Permalink

    Linda

    When we have our first accurate vote count. Remember NH is still in recount. Many many lose ends there. The ballots have been tampered with. The chain of custody is an absolute joke. Ever wonder why that isn’t front page news?

    With $19.9 million, Ron Paul has raised more funds than any other GOP candidate (67 percent of Romney’s $26.9 million haul was his own money), has more cash on hand than Mitt, John, or MIke, and has absolutely zero debts!

    In Q4 fundraising, he is only three million dollars behind Democrat Obama, and he is the only candidate in the entire field, Democrat and Republican) who has no debts, not even to himself.

    This is entirely in accordance with his very frugal character and constitutes proof that only he can get the country out of its current debt crisis.

    The total national (federal government) debt is at 9 trillion dollars. According to the head of the GAO (US Government Accounting Office), including unfunded mandates (promised entitlements of the Bush administration like free prescription drugs for seniors, etc) the total national debt lies at $59 trillion.

    That is three times the entire amount of US dollars in existence around the world today!

    http://www.nolanchart.com/article1646.html

  357. Posted February 2, 2008 at 2:42 pm | Permalink

    Linda

    And the media puts SOME of its bias to bed.

    Posted By: Nathan A.
    Date: 2008-02-02 13:48:18

    Went to a Ron Paul Rally in Denver last night: The place seated over 1,500 people, and at least have that were left standing wall too wall. Altho the local media reported “1,600 supporters” showed up, it was really more like 3,000 – 4,000 supporters. This movement has exploded more than any other Candidate in the race despite the lack of media attention. Go RON PAUL!!! http://www.RonPaul2008.com

    http://www.nolanchart.com/article1646.html

  358. CapnAmerica
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 2:43 pm | Permalink

    Okay, it finally happened.

    Some spammer posted a link to an illegal website (and I mean VERY illegal) on The WEBLOG.

    I’m logging off and reporting this.

    I recommend that others do the same.

  359. CapnAmerica
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 2:45 pm | Permalink

    Perhaps this will give the editors and the naysayers who use the WEBLOG some idea of why more oversight is necessary.

  360. Tap Herroni
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 2:45 pm | Permalink

    Barack Hussein Obama, President of the United States of America.

    Cries of Allah akbar, God is great, shook from the crowds demonstrating at mosques all over the world, as America elects its first muslim President.

  361. Posted February 2, 2008 at 2:45 pm | Permalink

    What illegal web site? How is a web site illegal?

  362. CapnAmerica
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 2:46 pm | Permalink

    Because of what’s on it, Sol.

  363. Tap Herroni
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 2:46 pm | Permalink

    What illegal website? Foxnews?

    Capn goes crying to the blog editor – again.

  364. Ben
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 2:49 pm | Permalink

    No Pat – a child ‘bad-picture’ site on one of the old threads. There have been a lot of spam posts on those today.

    Interesting that the filter blocked me when I used the 4-letter word beginning with p and ending with n but let that on.

  365. Posted February 2, 2008 at 2:49 pm | Permalink

    One of my links?

  366. Posted February 2, 2008 at 2:51 pm | Permalink

    Buenos Aires, Oct 13 (Prensa Latina) An Argentine official regarded the intention of the George W. Bush family to settle on the Acuifero Guarani (Paraguay) as surprising, besides being a bad signal for the governments of the region.

    Luis D Elia, undersecretary for the Social Habitat in the Argentine Federal Planning Ministry, issued a memo partially reproduced by digital INFOBAE.com, in which he spoke of the purchase by Bush of a 98,842-acre farm in northern Paraguay, between Brazil and Bolivia.

    The news circulated Thursday in non-official sources in Asuncion, Paraguay.

    D Elia considered this Bush step counterproductive for the regional power expressed by Presidents Nestor Kirchner, Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, Evo Morales, Hugo Chavez and Fidel Castro.

    He said that “it is a bad signal that the Bush family is doing business with natural resources linked to the future of MERCOSUR.”

    http://blindnation.wordpress.com/2006/10/17/bush-buys-land-in-northern-paraguay/

  367. Tap Herroni
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 2:57 pm | Permalink

    What Obama will bring to America:

    Iraq’s Shi’ites Celebrate Ashura
    Updated:14:54, Saturday January 19, 2008

    Iraq was spared widespread bloodshed as Shi’ites celebrated the climax of festival of Ashura.

    Pilgrims celebrate AsuraSecurity was tight in the city of Kerbala as 2.5 million pilgrims marked the end of the rite on Saturday.

    But several Shi’ites were killed in a rocket attack in the town of Tal Afar, north of Baghdad.

    Nearly 70 people were killed and 100 wounded on Friday in gun battles the cities Basra and Nassiriya between between security forces and gunmen from a messianic Shi’ite cult called the Soldiers of Heaven.

    The 10-day Ashura ritual sees Shi’ites mourn the slaying over 13 centuries ago of the Prophet Mohammad’s grandson Imam Hussein near the holy city of Kerbala.

    Pilgrims stuck their heads with swords and self-flagellated to show their grief.

    Imam Hussein’s death in 680 entrenched the schism between Shi’ite and Sunni Muslims over whom they recognised as the successors of Mohammed.

    The split still sharply divides Iraq, with tens of thousands killed in sectarian fighting since the US-led invasion in 2003.

    Ashura has been a target in the past for Sunni al Qaeda militants who view Shi’ites as heretics.

  368. Tap Herroni
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 2:59 pm | Permalink

    Coming to America in 2009?

    London Muslims “Celebrate” 9/11

    Jihadist mullahs urge 1,000 followers to learn the murderous lessons of the WTC attack.

    An obscene spectacle took place in North London on September 11, 2002. A thousand Muslims gathered at the Finsbury Park mosque to “celebrate” the bombing of the World Trade Center. The Metropolitan Police deployed a force 500-strong to protect the meeting, called “A Towering Day in History,” from disruption. A dozen or so menacing-looking men with kaffiyehs over their faces stood on the mosque’s steps to prevent unfriendly journalists from entering.

    The “celebration” began promptly at 1 pm, so that participants could applaud the action of the WTC bombers at exactly 1:46 London time—the exact time, a year earlier, when the first plane hit its target in New York. Chairing the meeting was Abu Hamza, an Egyptian-born engineer turned Muslim mullah, who presides over the notorious Finsbury Park mosque, where several of the detainees in Camp Delta, Guantanamo Bay, captured fighting for the Taliban and al-Qaida, received their theological training. Hamza also reportedly recruited to the jihad Richard Reid, the would-be shoe-bomber who failed to blow up an American Airlines flight from Paris to Miami on December 22, 2001. The good imam is implicated as well in the training and instigation of Zacarias Moussaoui, under arrest on suspicion of conspiring with the 19 murderers of September 11.

  369. Ben
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 3:01 pm | Permalink

    Upon what do you base your claim that Christian Obama would bring that here? Sounds like insane BS to me.

  370. Ben
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 3:03 pm | Permalink

    Since Obama is a Protestant perhaps he will bring the Irish “Green-Orange” Troubles here.

  371. Ben
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 3:04 pm | Permalink

    Sol – it’s this garbage:

    By Jack on February 2, 2008 at 4:39 am
    Jack…

    Ok, I’m not in complete agreement with this, but I see your point. Thanks for sharing….

    By In Investing Preferred Stock on February 2, 2008 at 5:20 am
    In Investing Preferred Stock…

    Investing For Dummies Vhs Dvd…

    By Kds Bbs Pics Childporn Underage Nudist on February 2, 2008 at 2:32 pm
    Kds Bbs Pics Childporn Underage Nudist…

    I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view…

    By Bank Mortgage Reverse on February 2, 2008 at 3:00 pm
    Bank Mortgage Reverse…

    Here is something close to the truth, and they dont have any mercy…

  372. Posted February 2, 2008 at 3:10 pm | Permalink

    Ben — Consider the source — DNFTT’s!!

  373. Tap Herroni
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 3:13 pm | Permalink

    From Obama’s Church, not Muslim, just racist. Only Black Christians welcome there?

    We are a congregation which is Unashamedly Black and Unapologetically Christian… Our roots in the Black religious experience and tradition are deep, lasting and permanent. We are an African people, and remain “true to our native land,” the mother continent, the cradle of civilization. God has superintended our pilgrimage through the days of slavery, the days of segregation, and the long night of racism. It is God who gives us the strength and courage to continuously address injustice as a people, and as a congregation. We constantly affirm our trust in God through cultural expression of a Black worship service and ministries which address the Black Community.

    The Pastor as well as the membership of Trinity United Church of Christ is committed to a 10-point Vision:

    A congregation committed to ADORATION.
    A congregation preaching SALVATION.
    A congregation actively seeking RECONCILIATION.
    A congregation with a non-negotiable COMMITMENT TO AFRICA.
    A congregation committed to BIBLICAL EDUCATION.
    A congregation committed to CULTURAL EDUCATION.
    A congregation committed to the HISTORICAL EDUCATION OF AFRICAN PEOPLE IN DIASPORA.
    A congregation committed to LIBERATION.
    A congregation committed to RESTORATION.
    A congregation working towards ECONOMIC PARITY.

    http://www.tucc.org/about.htm

  374. Posted February 2, 2008 at 3:14 pm | Permalink

    Tap Herroni
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 2:45 pm | Permalink
    Barack Hussein Obama, President of the United States of America.

    Cries of Allah akbar, God is great, shook from the crowds demonstrating at mosques all over the world, as America elects its first muslim President.
    ===========================

    LIES!!! ALL BLATANT LIES!!! THIS SHOULD ALSO BE REPORTED AS ILLEGAL!! IT IS NOTHING BUT GOOD OLD FASHIONED NAZI STYLE HATE SPEECH!!

    PAX ON YOU PAT HERRON!! LIAR!! DAMNED LIAR!!

  375. Posted February 2, 2008 at 3:20 pm | Permalink

    AND IT IS A GREAT CONGREGATION, IN A GREAT AND NOBLE DENOMINATION!!! AND TRY AS YOU LIKE, PAT, YOUR RACIST DRIVEL HAS BEEN DEBUNKED AT LEAST A DOZEN TIMES!!

    http://www.tucc.org/about.htm

    http://www.ucc.org

  376. Posted February 2, 2008 at 3:21 pm | Permalink

    Pat Herron is a lying effin racist!! AND, he is also quite nucking futs!!

  377. Pedant
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 3:21 pm | Permalink

    Tap Herroni
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 2:45 pm, 2:46 pm, & 2:59 pm

    :lol:

    Ah, the release of Swift Boat Veterans for Truth 2.0, just in time for elections in November.

    I guess Pat’s faith that some Americans have never progressed beyond the ignorance of Bill the Butcher (The Gangs of New York is on display here.

    Pat or anybody who’d listen to that kind of BS is one s-a-a-a-d puppy.

  378. Ben
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 3:23 pm | Permalink

    Pat believes in the theory that if you tell a lie enough times the ditto-heads will believe it.

  379. Posted February 2, 2008 at 3:23 pm | Permalink

    Hey Pat, you got your white sheet ready for the Rally Tuesday nite?? Klans all over have rallies every year on Shrove Tuesday… Yours having one in Wichita?? LOL You lying facist Racist Troll!! Lets hope your white shirt doesnt get burned by the flaming cross that you all like to burn!! CHICKENS!! RCISTS!!

  380. Posted February 2, 2008 at 3:24 pm | Permalink

    Pedant, I have sent in a LOT of that RACIST BS over the past several weeks… Seems the WEBlog Editors dont want to challenge that CRAP!!

  381. Regular
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 3:26 pm | Permalink

    Ben, do you think there are climate regions?

  382. Tap Herroni
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 3:26 pm | Permalink

    You are the Bishop or was it Grand Wizard Chas.

    Don’t go calling others racists.

    Chas, do you use such fowl language in church? What church would that be?

  383. Ben
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 3:28 pm | Permalink

    Obviously regular.

  384. Regular
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 3:29 pm | Permalink

    Church of the exaggerated pontification Pat. :)

  385. Regular
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 3:30 pm | Permalink

    So the co2 levels in one region as compared to another region might vary widely, right Ben?

  386. Posted February 2, 2008 at 3:31 pm | Permalink

    Yep Pat, I call it Racist Crap in church… it’s the truth, so thats what we tell them!!

    I am NOT Bishop… So, STOP YOUR LYING!! Oh, I am so sorry, you do it so well, you cant tell the difference any more!! YOU ARE LYING PAT… STOP IT!!

    YOU HAVE ALREADY BEEN TURNED IN FOR BEING A RACIST PIECE OF CRAP!!

    If you want to post politics fine… YOU POST RACIAL HATRED!! You lying Mutha______

    WHY DONT YOU JUST GO FIND SOME FACIST COUNTRY WHERE YOU MIGHT FEEL AT HOME!! IDIOT!!

    PEOPLE ON THIS BLOG ARE SICK AND TIRED OF RACISM, AND BIGOTRY, AND HATE SPEECH!! WE ARE NOT GOING TO TAKE IT ANY MORE!!

  387. Ben
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 3:31 pm | Permalink

    no

  388. Nathan
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 3:33 pm | Permalink

    Well, at least Trinity United Church’s mission is to call all to Christ.

    Not so sure about you on that one Chas.

  389. Tap Herroni
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 3:33 pm | Permalink

    I’VE BEEN TURNED IN!

    OH NO!

    AND MY CAPS LOCK KEY IS BROKE TOO!

    OH MY!
    OH MY!
    OH MY!

  390. Regular
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 3:33 pm | Permalink

    Oh? Why is that Ben? You mean a jungle would have the same co2 levels as let’s say downtown London or the Mohave desert?

  391. Tap Herroni
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 3:34 pm | Permalink

    I’M TELLING MOM!

    NEXT I’LL BE DAMNED TO HELL, BY A PREACHER!

  392. Posted February 2, 2008 at 3:35 pm | Permalink

    PAT HERRON — YOU THINK CALLING YOU A RACIST LIAR IS FOWL LANGUAGE??? BOY, YOU AINT SEEN NOTHING YET!! YOU BETTER JUST STAY IN YOUR SOCK DRAWER, LOSER!!

  393. Tap Herroni
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 3:36 pm | Permalink

    PHONY PREACHER.

    CALLS ALL TO CHRIST BY HIS WORDS AND DEEDS DOESN’T HE?

    SHINING EXAMPLE.

    BEACON OF LIGHT IN THE MIDST OF DARKNESS HE IS.

    CALLING ALL TO BASK IN THE WARMTH OF HIS WARM WORDS AND COMFORT.

  394. Posted February 2, 2008 at 3:36 pm | Permalink

    Nathan
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 3:33 pm | Permalink
    Well, at least Trinity United Church’s mission is to call all to Christ.

    Not so sure about you on that one Chas.
    =========================================

    NATHAN LIKES TO LIE TOO!! NATHAN, YOU ARE JUST ABOUT AS BIGOTED AS PAT HERRON!! ONLY YOU DO IT IN THE NAME OF JESUS!! SACRILEGE!!

  395. Pedant
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 3:36 pm | Permalink

    Somehow I just can’t believe that Pat & Friends will win a “transformative” election (November is shaping up to be an election framed by “hope”) with a message of misogyny. Americans are tired of Washington using fear to manipulate the vote (misogyny has, at its root, fear).

    Did yall know that the FOX television program “24″ is no longer being aired?

    Know why? It’s related to the reason Pat’s vote will be cancelled at the ballot box this year.

    “Fear” doesn’t do well against “hope,” not for real Americans anyway.

  396. Tap Herroni
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 3:37 pm | Permalink

    I AIN’T SEEN NOTHIN YET!

    DA DA.

    NO BABY, YA AIN’T SEEN NOTHIN YET!

    DON’T CUSS CHAS, YOU DEMEAN YUSELF.

  397. Posted February 2, 2008 at 3:39 pm | Permalink

    NATHAN, YOU AT LEAST GOT IT RIGHT ON THE MISSION OF TRINITY UCC…. IT IS ONE OF THE BIGGEST CHURCHES IN THEIR DENOMINATION!!

    IT IS NOT A RACIST CHURCH!! IN SPITE OF WHAT PAT HERRON IS TRYING TO SAY, THAT CHURCH IS THERE FOR ALL PEOPLE… WHOEVER THEY ARE, WHEREVER THEY MAY BE IN THEIR FAITH JOURNEY!!

    NO RACISM THERE… AT LEAST 25% OF THE MEMBERSHIP IS WHITE… HARDLY AN ALL BLACK CONGREGATION!! BUT PAT HERRON WILL KEEP LYING, BECAUSE PAT HERRON IS A EFFIN RACIST!!

  398. Regular
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 3:39 pm | Permalink

    I grant you absolution Tap Herroni.

    (turns collar around the other way)

  399. Tap Herroni
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 3:40 pm | Permalink

    YOU AIN’T SEEN NOTHIN YET

    I met a devil woman.
    She took my heart away.
    She said I had it coming to me.
    but I wanted it that way.
    I think that any lovin’s good lovin.
    So I took what I could get.
    She looked at me with her big brown eyes and said.
    you ain’t seen nothing yet….b.b.b.baby you just aint seen n.nothin yet
    here’s somethin your just never gonna forget,
    b.b.b.b. baby you just aint seen n.n. nothing yet
    And now I’m feeling better.
    Cause I found out for sure.
    She took me to her doctor.
    And he told me I was cured.
    He said that any love is good love
    so i took what i could get,
    She looked at me with her big brown eyes and said
    you ain’t seen nothing yet….b.b.b.baby you just ain’t seen n.n.nothin yet
    here’s something
    here’s something your never gonna forget baby,
    you know
    you know
    you know you just ain’t seen n.n. nothin yet
    any lovin is good lovin
    so i took what i could get,
    she looked at my with her big brown eyes and said
    you aint seen nothin yet
    baby you just aint seen n.n. othing yet
    here’s somethin
    here’s somethin
    here’s somethin your never gonna forget baby
    baby baby baby you just aint seen nothing yet
    you aint seen nothing yet (repeat until fade)

  400. Posted February 2, 2008 at 3:41 pm | Permalink

    Gee, Pedant, I thought “24″ was off cause of the writer’s strike!! Tell me more, please??

  401. Nathan
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 3:41 pm | Permalink

    Chas,

    Calling me a liar is getting rather old.

    Please continue in your melt down mode.

  402. Tap Herroni
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 3:41 pm | Permalink

    Regular, when IT turned it’s head all the way around, IT scared me right back into my sock drawer!

  403. Posted February 2, 2008 at 3:42 pm | Permalink

    Aint that just effin special… One racist granting another racist absolution!! Hey, Racist Regular… He hasnt repented YET!!

  404. Regular
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 3:43 pm | Permalink

    Shhhh Chas, I’m making this up as I go.

  405. Posted February 2, 2008 at 3:43 pm | Permalink

    NATHAN… you want to not be called a Liar???

    Then YOU stop saying I am not a Christian, just because you dont agree with me!! Got It???

    Otherwise, you remain a liar and a bigot!!

  406. Tap Herroni
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 3:43 pm | Permalink

    Is that Tubular Bells I hear?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jc7r7GPAvnU

  407. cosmos
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 3:44 pm | Permalink

    JimmyMac,

    I apologize for not including your opinion that Scripps CO2 data was invalid, because there was an international revision.

    Please re-draw this graph, to show the approximately 0.16 ppmv revision.

    http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/insitu.html

  408. Posted February 2, 2008 at 3:44 pm | Permalink

    Your LIFE is made up as you go, Regular!! Keep on being a racist liar… it’s your choice… I would not encourage it, but it IS your choice!! BTW, Racism is NOT being Pro Life!! LOL

  409. Posted February 2, 2008 at 3:46 pm | Permalink

    Nathan — You might as well get used to it… LOTS of Christians dont agree with YOU!! Get over it!! You are NOT GOD!! Gee, I hope that doesnt damage your macho image too much!!

  410. Ben
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 3:46 pm | Permalink

    Regular – there will be LOCAL variations – much like the fact that the air composition inside this building will be different from outside. But not broad REGIONAL variations – especially at altitude. The air mixes pole-to-pole. That is why sampling protocols are so importent.

    I recommend a good climatology text – I’ll look up the title and author of one I have when I get home.

  411. Ben
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 3:48 pm | Permalink

    http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/insitu.html

    Note that CO2 tracks pretty much the same for Alaska and Hawaii.

  412. Tap Herroni
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 3:48 pm | Permalink

    Some CHRISTians believe in CHRIST and others don’t.

    Just because you act like an idiot and don’t beleive in CHRIST as your personal savior, doesn’t mean you are NOT a CHRISTian pastor.

  413. Posted February 2, 2008 at 3:51 pm | Permalink

    Pat, that is the stupidest thing yet!! If you dont believe in Christ, you are hardly a Christian!!

  414. Posted February 2, 2008 at 3:51 pm | Permalink

    Numb nuts!!

  415. Regular
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 3:51 pm | Permalink

    I guess Ben decided not to answer my last question. :)
    ===========================
    #
    Regular
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 3:33 pm | Permalink

    Oh? Why is that Ben? You mean a jungle would have the same co2 levels as let’s say downtown London or the Mohave desert?
    ============================

    Since Ben admitted there are climate regions, which means the climate is variable from one region to another – that must mean that measurements such as temperature, wind and humidity must differ.

    Would this not influence the release of co2? I think it does.

    So, if that is the case, the the combination of co2 into database from various climate regions around the world makes absolutely no sense. There is no “average” climate nor is there an “average” co2 reading.

    But, this is exactly what the alarmists are trying to do with their “common sky (atmosphere) theory.”

    If average co2 was a reality, then every place on earth would have similar temperatures. They don’t and will never happen, because there are a huge amount of natural variation factors that affect climate far greater than co2 does.

  416. Tap Herroni
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 3:52 pm | Permalink

    So Chas, you admit now that you believe in Christ as your personal savior?

  417. Pedant
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 3:53 pm | Permalink

    Chas, new “24″ episodes are off the air because FOX couldn’t resolve a change to the lead character before the writers’ strike.

    Reruns are off the air, too. According to the WSJ, the ratings were in the tank last season due to changing American attitudes about torture. Because FOX didn’t have time before the strike to resolve the show’s new direction, executives decided to prevent damage to its flagship program by letting the show go completely dormant. No reruns, in other words.

    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120189888101136151.html?mod=hps_us_pageone

  418. Regular
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 3:54 pm | Permalink

    I saw variability Ben, not a standard co2 that exists world wide.

    How would you classify variability not being the reason there are different climate regions?

  419. Posted February 2, 2008 at 3:54 pm | Permalink

    I am not telling YOU anything, Troll Racist!!

    I have said repeatedly I AM A CHRISTIAN!!

    Now, either you accept that, or you dont… If not, just SHUT THE F*** UP ABOUT IT!!

    We all KNOW you dont believe in Christ, or you wouldnt be posting Racist Garbage!!

  420. Posted February 2, 2008 at 3:56 pm | Permalink

    Oh wow… Thanks Pedant!! BTW, how is the East Coast treating you??

  421. Tap Herroni
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 3:57 pm | Permalink

    Chas can’t answer the most basic question any Christian is proud to answer as obligated to spread the word of God.

    Chas, do you hear weeping and gnashing of teeth yet?

  422. Posted February 2, 2008 at 3:59 pm | Permalink

    SOL — just a thought here — Given Ron Paul’s aversion to all things military, doesnt it strike you a bit odd that so many contributions would come to his campaign from Military personnel?? I mean, if he DID get elected, he would most likely be eliminating a whole LOT of military jobs — right??

  423. Ben
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 4:00 pm | Permalink

    Regular – I DID answer your question. At ground level there are localized differences. However more broadly there are not as can be seen from the consistency among measurements at Hawaii, Alaska, Antarctica, etc. So, we CAN determine the global averages which are what we follow.

    As I noted – I recommend an elementary climatology text. Climate regions are determined by things like altitude, latitude, proximity to mountains, etc etc etc.

    WSU has some courses you might consider.

    “If average co2 was a reality, then every place on earth would have similar temperatures” FALSE STATEMENT.

  424. Posted February 2, 2008 at 4:01 pm | Permalink

    Oh Pat, once again you prove yourself to be a lying PIG!! I didnt say I cant answer your stupid question… I said I WONT answer it!!

    Wrong again Troll PIG!!

  425. Tap Herroni
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 4:02 pm | Permalink

    Phony Preachers are perhaps the most harmful threat to Christianity today.

    Beware of those “Christians” who act in the name of Christ, yet are unable to proclaim him as their personal savior.

  426. Posted February 2, 2008 at 4:03 pm | Permalink

    Hmmmm Pat Herron (P H) Reverse of H P (Hank Price) Funny how some of Pat’s typing is similar to Hank and/or Nathan!! ROFL!!

    Go to your Sock Drawer, Pat Racist Herron!!

  427. Tap Herroni
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 4:04 pm | Permalink

    Through his words and his deeds, satan shall reveal himself.

    Fear not, for victory shall not be his.

  428. Pedant
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 4:04 pm | Permalink

    Fine Chas, and thanks for asking!

    Working my tail off in my job, and trying to enjoy the area in what passes for my down time. :D

    I drive by St. Paul’s Church every morning on my way to work (there’s still a cannonball hole punched in one of its southern walls, from when the British shelled downtown Norfolk on Jan 1, 1776). Unfortunately I pass the church in the dark, so eh. But the trip home is a treat. I always drive up Boush Street to the YMCA, and that means that I get to drive by the USS Wisconsin, which is docked at the Nauticus museum in downtown Norfolk. And that is a very impressive rowboat, in this Kansan’s opinion. :wink:

    Hope all is well in your world, too.

  429. Posted February 2, 2008 at 4:08 pm | Permalink

    I’ve been to St. Paul’s Church before… I think its neat that they never patched up the hole in the wall… Met the Pastor there many years ago… My sis lived in Newport News for years… then moved over to Yorktown… Her hubby was a police officer on the Hampton Department for 24+ years, AFTER 20+ years in the Army… I have many fond memories of the Tidewater area…

  430. Posted February 2, 2008 at 4:10 pm | Permalink

    Say, Pedant, did you ever go see the Parish Cemetery, at St. John’s, Elizabeth City Parish?? There are some really unique head stones in that Cemetery… Also, neat head stones out at Bruton Parish, in Williamsburg…

  431. Regular
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 4:10 pm | Permalink

    Ben
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 4:00 pm | Permalink

    Regular – I DID answer your question. At ground level there are localized differences. However more broadly there are not as can be seen from the consistency among measurements at Hawaii, Alaska, Antarctica, etc. So, we CAN determine the global averages which are what we follow.

    As I noted – I recommend an elementary climatology text. Climate regions are determined by things like altitude, latitude, proximity to mountains, etc etc etc.

    WSU has some courses you might consider.

    “If average co2 was a reality, then every place on earth would have similar temperatures” FALSE STATEMENT
    ———————–
    So then, you state that co2 averages would be false and I agree.

    Then what about the claim of average temperatures?

    I mean how does the average temperature of a climate region, let’s say around the South Pole compare to the average temperature of the Gobi Desert in Mongolia?

    Can I make a prediction about future climate change knowing the average temperature of these two climate regions?

    What about knowing the average temperature of all climate regions?

    And exactly what is the optimum temperature for the planet earth? :)

    If the areas around oceans have about 1 atmosphere of pressure and this pressure is what is utilized to analyze wind construction of storm fronts, what angular progression of prediction can I extrapolate to determine the climate of a region on the other side of the world that may be at 20,000 feet in altitude?

  432. Regular
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 4:11 pm | Permalink

    not angular progression – linear progression …heh

  433. Regular
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 4:13 pm | Permalink

    be back later, I’ll let you ponder that one Ben. :)

  434. Posted February 2, 2008 at 4:14 pm | Permalink

    Beware of prowling trolls, Ben!!

  435. Ben
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 4:15 pm | Permalink

    Obviously it is colder at the South Pole than the Gobi. So what? And yes, we do make projections regionally as well as globally.

    “you state that co2 averages ” I never said that. I said your statement (i.e. your conclusion) was and is FALSE. The fact that the South Pole and Hawaii have similar CO2 (as measured) does NOT mean they have the same temperature.

    As for your last question I have no clue even what you asked. Again, I suggest a textbook – it especially helps to have maps and figures. I fine a globe useful as well.

  436. Ben
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 4:16 pm | Permalink

    “Can I make a prediction about future climate change?” NO

    Can scientists who know what they are doing make such predictions? YES

  437. Posted February 2, 2008 at 4:21 pm | Permalink

    CO is trying to give JayHawks a good run for their money!! KS has 3 pt lead middle of 2nd half.. Hang on Hawks!! Wildcats already lost to Mizzou…

  438. Ben
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 4:23 pm | Permalink

    Maybe the JHawks will lose 2 straight? Did the Cats spook them?

  439. Posted February 2, 2008 at 4:24 pm | Permalink

    I think K-State really spooked them bad in Manhattan!!

  440. Regular
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 4:41 pm | Permalink

    Thanks for the suggestion of a textbook Ben, but don’t you think that is a bit condescending?

    Absorption and reflection of heat varies widely by climate region wouldn’t you agree?

    And as the absorption and reflection differs by climate region, heat retention also varies by climate region. Would you agree with that?

    In fact, it is this heat retention and colder fronts driven by several factors that cause certain areas to be more “storm” driven than others.

    Notice that I haven’t used a milli-mol of co2 yet. Let’s say the heat retention and release occurs over 100 years – then we start to have a definition of a climate region, along with geology, latitude and etc. as you stated.

    Now I figure you might guess what is next, but I’ll let you answer or reply to this first. :)

  441. Ben
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 4:47 pm | Permalink

    Obviously those are all factors – and they are all included in our understanding of climets. So what’s your point?

    Yes, it might be condescending. But, just as that is how I learned, so that might be how you might learn. I don’t think I can teach meterology or climatology on a blog.

  442. Regular
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 4:51 pm | Permalink

    Well Ben, I see you are not interested in having an intelligent discussion on climate and that your mind is made up.

    Too bad and I thought you were a scientist that doesn’t carry preconceived prejudice into a situation.

    Closed minds are a waste a thought.

  443. cosmos
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 4:53 pm | Permalink

    Ben posted February 2, 2008 at 4:15 pm

    As for your last question I have no clue even what you asked.

    JimmyMac’s climate questions are nonscientific nonsense, just like his claims about climate.

  444. Pat Herron
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 4:56 pm | Permalink

    Ohhhh Bama,
    Ohhhh Bama,

    I had a candidate
    Barack was his name
    Since he met me
    I’ve never been the same
    ‘Cause I love my candidate
    Obama, where can you be
    Where can you be?

    Hope everyone is playing nice and respectable.

    We have our man now, there is no reason to fight.

    Ohhh Bama, Ohhh Bama!

  445. Pat Herron
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 4:58 pm | Permalink

    I see Capn UnAmerica is at it again,
    playing as the blog troll and trying
    to label and name all the bloggers.

    Come on down Capn
    and take a free ride.

    Yeah, yeah, yeah!

    Cause we got to get it on again,
    work it out together.

    Learn to support Obama!

  446. Ben
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 4:59 pm | Permalink

    “Closed minds are a waste a thought”

    I agree. 100% And yes, I am a scientist. Present me with some useful information and I will use it. But just telling me it is dark at night and light in the day is not useful information. And telling me that CO2 is not the ONLY factor is also not useful information. I already know that.

    If I were going to go into any depth in general meteorology/climatology I would need ‘visual aids’ as I have used when teaching or giving seminars. Not simply text in a blog.

  447. cosmos
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 5:04 pm | Permalink

    Ben,

    It’s also interesting how the CO2 levels at the top of the towers in mainland U.S.,
    http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/diurnal.html

    are roughly similar to Mauna Loa’s levels.

    Plus larger seasonal variations at WI than at NC.

  448. Posted February 2, 2008 at 5:09 pm | Permalink

    Ummm Pat, dont know what yer smoking, but CapN hasnt posted here in over 2 hours!! You need new glasses or what??

  449. Posted February 2, 2008 at 5:19 pm | Permalink

    Tap Herroni Posted February 2, 2008 at 4:04 pm | Permalink Through his words and his deeds, satan shall reveal himself.

    Fear not, for victory shall not be his.
    ===========================================

    You should know… You are his faithful disciple of HATRED and RACISM!! LOL

  450. ken
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 5:22 pm | Permalink

    THIS WAS POSTED JUST AFTER MIDNIGHT ___

    want to make sure people saw it:

    I attended Fridays performance of “The Diviners”, was so impressed by the
    production that I posted the following on the Wichita Eagle blog – Open Thread
    dated Feb. 1, 2008 : (please forward to the Director and cast and crew):

    Saw the Wichita Community Theater Production of “The Diviner” tonight —— will
    just say that the audience was stunned …… many with tears in their eyes …. it
    was that good, several rose to give a standing ovation, those that didn’t I
    think were frozen by the performance.
    I think a reviewer might say

    “WCT staged a classic of “The Diviner” with a cast that almost made the simple,
    minimal well lit set not necessary —- from beginning to end, with each character
    getting emotionally closer and closer to the audience with a charm and humor and
    warmth that hypnotized the audience. They played the audience like a drum, the
    humor was spot on and the pathos and drama were haunting … a must see of the
    local theater season. ”

    Tickets 12$, small venue runs weekends through the 16th — may be crowded / sold
    out.

  451. Posted February 2, 2008 at 5:23 pm | Permalink

    Ken — If I was in Wichita, I would surely go see the play… Your description sounds terrific!

  452. Regular
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 5:26 pm | Permalink

    yeah Ben sure you would need visual aids and not discuss a topic.

    Face it, your mind is closed to discussion on the matter.

    Just like cosmos’s mind is closed.

    I’ve taken two meteorological courses at the graduate level. Maybe I should have been more condescending towards you in discussing this topic.

    Now maybe tara will understand why discussing anything on this blog is a useless endeavor, because no one wants to discuss anything.

    Have a nice day.

  453. Posted February 2, 2008 at 5:47 pm | Permalink

    Earlier, somebody posted a list of campaign contributions to Ron Paul’s campaign… showing that military contributions top the list…

    Just a thought here — Given Ron Paul’s aversion to all things military, doesnt it strike you a bit odd that so many contributions would come to his campaign from Military personnel?? I mean, if he DID get elected, he would most likely be eliminating a whole LOT of military jobs — right??

  454. Pedant
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 5:49 pm | Permalink

    Chas.
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 4:10 pm | Permalink

    Say, Pedant, did you ever go see the Parish Cemetery, at St. John’s, Elizabeth City Parish?? There are some really unique head stones in that Cemetery… Also, neat head stones out at Bruton Parish, in Williamsburg…

    No, I haven’t visited either place yet. The local newspaper had an article about St. John’s Parish Cemetery a couple weeks ago, and it really piqued my interest in the headstones there. Your confirming it just means I’m going to have to get over there pretty soon. Tourist season begins in Williamsburg in a couple months, too, so I need to get over there really quick, too.

    The local paper, The Virginian-Pilot, is owned by Landmark Communications. Landmark also owns The Weather Channel, and at the end of last year Landmark put itself up for sale. I hear that the major stockholder thinks the value of the news operation, outside TWC, has peaked, this year or maybe even a couple years ago. I really like this newspaper, for a number of reasons. There’s a palpable Southern charm to its local news, and it’s really committed to local news. Also, it publishes a handful of articles by local historians, including the one a couple weeks ago about St. John’s Parish. This area of the country just oozes history, as you know. Hopefully the new owners will continue to provide an outlet for historians and their works…but that sure seems to me to be one of those human interest functions that’s the first to go under new corporate ownership. We’ll see.

    Oh, it may not matter since rumor has it that one of the bidders is Pat Robertson. Seems the soothsayin’ Ruh-HEV-rund wants to give the journalism students at his Regent U a place to hone their skills at slanting news the Right way. Once he gets ‘em trained up, he hopes to unleash his 4th-estate minions on American journalism in the same way his Regent Law School grads were unleashed on the Justice Department, courtesy of Augustus Stupidus. Remember that? If Robertson’s bid is accepted, I’m canceling my subscription. :D

    Thanks for the tourism tips!

  455. Posted February 2, 2008 at 5:50 pm | Permalink

    Even when Regular is obviously handed his newly cleaned clock on a silver platter, he storms off the Blog, and claims to be the winner!!

    Used to be this kid in our neighborhood who did that same kind of thing… We eventually didnt let him come play basketball anymore!! That kid could lose by 20 points, and stomp away grumbling how he couldnt play with people of less skill than he had… even though he had clearly been beaten —

    Just like REgular does here!! ROFL brings back real funny memories!!

  456. Posted February 2, 2008 at 5:54 pm | Permalink

    Good luck, Pedant… and keep in touch!!

    Have a great Spring time!!

    Oh, one more… Down south of the shipyards on I-95 is this really BIG Seafood Buffet Restaurant… The buffet line is maybe 50 – 60 feet long… It has ALL kinds of things on it!!

    Price is resonable… Maybe you’ve been there??

  457. Posted February 2, 2008 at 5:59 pm | Permalink

    “Regent Law School grads were unleashed on the Justice Department, courtesy of Augustus Stupidus. Remember that? If Robertson’s bid is accepted, I’m canceling my subscription.”

    yea, I do remember that… I also remember how one of the “attorneys” that stood up with Monica Lewinsky, and one of the other “Clinton Girls” was that radical right winger, Jay Sekulow… Remember him?? He even predates Bush, and came out of Regents Univ.

  458. Regular
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 6:13 pm | Permalink

    There was no cleaned clock Chas, Ben refused to engage in a discussion because he thought he was “too good” to do so.

    As usual Chas, you are a delusional fool without a clue.

    Ben in my opinion is nothing more than a chemistry clod who may have been something at one time, although I don’t see how he was with that attitude he carries around.

  459. Regular
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 6:16 pm | Permalink

    Thanks for the basketball analogy Chas. If we were playing basketball, Ben would have got his ass kicked. My specialty was tomahawking the ball over people and making them eat net.

  460. cosmos
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 6:16 pm | Permalink

    JimmyMac posted February 2, 2008 at 5:26 pm

    Face it, your mind is closed to discussion on the matter.

    Just like cosmos’s mind is closed.

    My mind isn’t closed to discussion on climate science.

    I just do not rely on bogus, non-refereed claims — like E.G. Beck’s CO2 nonsense. Scientists have known for 50 years that global CO2 measurements should be taken at remote sites.

  461. Posted February 2, 2008 at 6:58 pm | Permalink

    I hope you enjoy your nice newly cleaned clock, James… Ben stopped talking to you, because you were asking nonsense questions… like normal… Except for Ben and Cosmos know when you are talking Bogus junk… Those of us NON scientists are never sure… but we suspect it…

    Make sure that clock is all wound up, now… you wouldnt want to be late for anything important!!

  462. Posted February 2, 2008 at 7:04 pm | Permalink

    LOL ya just cant fix stupid, James…

    You wrote: “making them eat net.’

    THAT is a reference to Volleyball!! NOT Basketball!! Idiot!!

  463. Regular
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 7:32 pm | Permalink

    Okay Chas, fake minister. Or is it you are a Satanic minister?

    Perhaps your congregation would enjoy reading what you print here.

    Eat net Chas is a term referring to basketball as well. it’s when someone gets underneath you when you go into slam and all they see is the ball slashing through the net onto their face. It’s also called “facial.”

    I would put you in the same category as Phelps, but Phelps isn’t a hypocrite, he practices what he preaches. You on the other hand are all over the board and no doubt are one the slimiest two-faced hypocrites to ever roam the earth. You’re a con man Chas, nothing else.

  464. Posted February 2, 2008 at 7:49 pm | Permalink

    What?? I am Con man, because I happen to know a little bit about Volleyball?? Listen, you sick pevert… I have been around basketball since I was 8 years old… at all levels except NBA… And I have NEVER EVER heard the term Facial, applied to an attempt at a slam dunk!! Eating Net, is when you go for a slam in Volleyball, and your opponent “eats net” attempting to block your hit… Sorry, you poor excuse for a Liar, but YOU are dead wrong on this one!! So, take your LYING CRAP and your Phony Soldier garbage, and go stick it somewhere!! Preferably somewhere the sun dont shine!!

    I dont know about the rest of this Blog, but I have had it with your impudence, your blatant arrogance, AND your constant LIES — not to mention your PHONY self-righteous propaganda!!

    And, furthermore, I have HAD IT James, with you calling me a Satanic Preacher… and a Non-minister…

    And YES… if my parishoners could see the vitriolic PUKE that you put on this Blog, they would be rooting me on to get RID of the likes of you, and all your little friends!! So, Go STICK it James!! And leave me the HELL ALONE!!! Got it??? Just Leave ME ALONE you piss poor loser!!

  465. Posted February 2, 2008 at 7:51 pm | Permalink

    FURTHERMORE, whast YOU describe as an attempt at a slam dunk — ummm you stupid fool, is only going to get a Foul called… Either on the one attempting the dunk, OR, the one underneath… the way YOU describe it, all you would get is a Foul, since your description is of running head long into another player already having position on you!!

    Like I said, YOU ARE NOTHING BUT A LOSER!!

  466. Regular
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 7:52 pm | Permalink

    Don’t call yourself a vitriolic puke Chas, you don’t rate that high.

  467. Posted February 2, 2008 at 7:53 pm | Permalink

    THAT WAS A REFERENCE TO YOUR SORRY A$$ NUMB NUTS!!

  468. Regular
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 8:04 pm | Permalink

    Perhaps you are unclear that you are addressing yourself Chas. I know that one as delusional in his thinking as you are probably doesn’t realize the difference. I wonder if your people know you have mental disorders of this nature.

  469. Posted February 2, 2008 at 8:10 pm | Permalink

    I am going to say to you again, what I said to you last year about this same time… YOU sir, are a sorry excuse for a Veteran of this nations honorable military service… and YOU sir are even a sorrier excuse for a MAN!! You have no respect for academic achievement, or ranking in society… You make a mockery out of anything religious that doesnt fit your narrow-minded bigoted mentality… YOU Sir, can go to Hell for all I care… There are few individuals in this world that I care absolutely nothing for…

    Unfortunately, there are several like that on this Blog!! And YOU, James, are at the top of my list!! YOU are a worthless, crippled old hypocrite!! I am sorry you are crippled… Only YOU can do anything about the worthless and the hypocrite parts!!

    Now, if you can be civil, and act human on here, I MIGHT address you… Otherwise, YOU sir, are a huge piece of persona non grata!! And You can just leave me the HELL alone!!! GOT IT?? Worthless!! Absolutely Worthless, James!! Worthless Veteran… Worthless MAN…. Just an old crippled up hypocrite!! How sad you are!!

  470. larry
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 8:31 pm | Permalink

    Does that mean you’re not taking him to the prom?

  471. cosmos
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 8:41 pm | Permalink

    Chas,

    Understanding what’s wrong with E.G. Beck’s bogus CO2 claims doesn’t really require much science.

    Look at the CO2 graphs here,
    http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/insitu.html

    The yearly swings are largest for Barrow (Alaska) — and are mostly caused by plants. There is more land in the Northern Hemisphere, and more plants. Each Spring in the NH, plants absorb more CO2, and in the Fall, they release it.

    Beck claims that CO2 was above 400 ppm back in the 1940’s (higher than it is today) — but there’s no credible explanation for that huge rise in CO2 back then, nor the huge drop a short time later.

    The only credible explanation is the obvious point Ben made upthread. Beck’s high readings are not representative of global CO2 levels.

    http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/02/open-thread-21-2/#comment-286339

  472. Regular
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 8:44 pm | Permalink

    heh Chas wants me to be civil and he is the least civil person on the blog, insulting someone in each and everyone of his posts.

    Chas is a totally mental case and a lost cause. Everyone can see that

    Oh Chas, that was written by an “old cripple” responding to your (little “c”)hristian values.

  473. Regular
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 8:46 pm | Permalink

    “…but there’s no credible explanation for that huge rise in CO2 back then, nor the huge drop a short time later.”

    Yeah, no explanation other than half the world was on fire from War.

  474. Apophis
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 8:49 pm | Permalink

    D
    N
    F
    T
    T

    Just walk on by the nutcase McCluer.

  475. Kansas
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 9:26 pm | Permalink

    Thank the stars! I just got word that WEB is going with registration before allowing someone to post!

    Maybe the nut jobs will finally be eliminated!

  476. CapnAmerica
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 9:49 pm | Permalink

    Kansas–

    Where did you hear that?

  477. lindainks55
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 9:52 pm | Permalink

    Haven’t we needed to be registered for some time now? Is there another change coming?

  478. Billy Bob
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 9:55 pm | Permalink

    How come we have to log in to leave messages on local articles. Guess they want to discourage discenting voices.

  479. Posted February 2, 2008 at 9:55 pm | Permalink

    “Maybe the nut jobs will finally be eliminated!”

    Dont count on it!! LOL

  480. CapnAmerica
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 9:55 pm | Permalink

    No, you don’t need to be registered, Linda.

    If they required registration, spammers couldn’t come on with their horrible touts . . .

  481. CapnAmerica
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 9:58 pm | Permalink

    Billy Bob–

    Did you want to post something but you chose not to because you had to log in?

    That’s your problem then . . .

  482. Posted February 2, 2008 at 10:03 pm | Permalink

    CapN — Did you get that spam problem fixed earlier??

  483. lindainks55
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 10:03 pm | Permalink

    Well, bring on registration. I don’t think it will get rid of this nut job ;-), but IF the spammers are stopped that’s a good step in the right direction.

    If we have registration will posters still be able to post under several nics? Will it stop them from posting under my nic if mine is already registered?

    I really am as dumb about all this as I sound. Don’t even know the right questions, let along any answers.

  484. Posted February 2, 2008 at 10:04 pm | Permalink

    bLOG DOESNT LIKE CERTAIN WORDS — LIKE P**N

  485. Posted February 2, 2008 at 10:05 pm | Permalink

    I see they got rid of the Spam Bammer thing…

  486. Posted February 2, 2008 at 10:07 pm | Permalink

    Lindda writes >> “Will it stop them from posting under my nic if mine is already registered?”

    I think the answer to that is YES… And in order to switch nics, the poster would have to re-register!!

  487. CapnAmerica
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 10:14 pm | Permalink

    I didn’t report it, Chas.

    I’m sick of trying to get through to the Editors.

    They know how to clean this place up, and they won’t do it.

    But they’ll make money selling ads that our hits make valuable . . .

  488. Posted February 2, 2008 at 10:23 pm | Permalink

    Well, CapN if they dont clean this thing up a little bit, to where a person can post without having to put up with personal attacks, and a bunch of ugly racism… I might have to have a brief conversation with the denominational office… and with the Publisher lady as well… She seems nice enough… and I think she really wants to make a difference…

  489. Posted February 2, 2008 at 10:34 pm | Permalink

    If anybody likes late nite public radio, “Midnight Special” is on at http://www.hppr.org click on Listen Now… Live streaming program… no registration… FREE…

  490. J R
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 10:47 pm | Permalink

    Well I won’t register if I have to give my name.

    There are too many insane people under one nic.

  491. CapnAmerica
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 10:52 pm | Permalink

    You won’t have to give your name, JR.

    You’ll just need an e-mail.

    People who get banned can re-register, but they’ll also have to get a new e-mail.

    Usually there’s a 24-48 lag time.

    Doesn’t make it impossible to troll, but it sure makes it a lot harder and a lot less fun.

  492. J R
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 10:57 pm | Permalink

    I can live with that.

    I don’t troll and I’ve never had more than one nic unless I disclosed fully.

    Heh, I bet James is scrambling to set up back up emails.

  493. CapnAmerica
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 11:01 pm | Permalink

    http://www.moviesanddown****.com/

    Yup. I picked this up from an old open thread.

    I don’t know for sure, but it probably links to a site in which you can break copy-right and download movies.

    The Wichita Eagle WEBlog seems like a funny place to allow people to steal intellectual property, since that’s what they deal in . . .

  494. Posted February 2, 2008 at 11:01 pm | Permalink

    Too bad they cant use some kind of Monitor system… That would stop all of the nonsense immediately!! well almost immediately… At least JR wouldnt keep getting attacked about his Son every day!!

    I had email from sugar… she isnt going to blog on here until the WE does something to control the freak show!! I wrote her back, and told her that was good!!

  495. Posted February 2, 2008 at 11:05 pm | Permalink

    CapN… That is sort of like what I keep getting in my Email when certain posters are lurking on the Blog… Only I get a LOT of them for “adult” web sites, and even some for kiddy pic sites… disgusting!

    But it only happens when I am on WE Blog!! I just havent figured that out yet!! BUT, I have an IT friend of mine working on it!!

  496. CapnAmerica
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 11:07 pm | Permalink

    You make a good point, JR.

    Somebody who sits in a hole like a spider all day and has no life except to entertain himself here the only way he knows how . . . it’s going to be hard to control that inDUHvidual.

  497. Posted February 2, 2008 at 11:09 pm | Permalink

    Hey, Check this out… Just got this link in an email from some old friends in Clevelans >>>

    http://www.ucc.org/news/thomas-denounces-smear-1.html

  498. CapnAmerica
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 11:14 pm | Permalink

    Chas.–

    Under the e-mail blank?

    Don’t put in your real e-mail.

    Put in a fake e-mail–something like Wichita@eagle.com.

    Since they don’t require a log-in, your e-mail doesn’t matter anyway . . .

  499. cosmos
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 11:21 pm | Permalink

    Capn,

    Here’s a very good example from JimmyMac.

    Regular posted February 2, 2008 at 6:13 pm

    Ben in my opinion is nothing more than a chemistry clod who may have been something at one time, although I don’t see how he was with that attitude he carries around.

    Some blogs have a credibilty rating system. For posters like JimmyMac, it’d have to have a large negative rating.

  500. J R
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 11:23 pm | Permalink

    I’m not savvy yet on my technology.

    Too much screen time devoted to genealogy lately.

    I have said that James is responsible for many otherwise considered respectable nics.

    Now, if he has to configure an email for EACH of them?

    I just may be proven correct.

    Bring on email registration!

  501. CapnAmerica
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 11:29 pm | Permalink

    Heh, funny, Cos.

    Good link, Chas.

    Okay, I’m out for the night.

    Seize ya later . . .

  502. Posted February 2, 2008 at 11:34 pm | Permalink

    Later CapN!!

  503. Tap Herroni
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 11:36 pm | Permalink

    The POWER of Chas displayed at 10:23.

    Wow!

  504. Tap Herroni
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 11:40 pm | Permalink

    Chas writes to himself and back. 11:01

  505. Tap Herroni
    Posted February 2, 2008 at 11:43 pm | Permalink

    Chas is you are getting p*rno emails then someone using your computer is visiting p*rno sites.

    Check your cookies.

  506. Posted February 2, 2008 at 11:53 pm | Permalink

    Good Night; Good Luck;
    God Bless, whatever you
    Conceive God to be!

    Blessings All!

    http://www.ucc.org/news/thomas-denounces-smear-1.html

  507. Posted February 3, 2008 at 12:07 am | Permalink

    Ummm Pat?? WEBlog has the IP addresses of the p*rno emails… One of their IT people is working on the situation. It isnt coming from MY computer. Sorry, wrong again Pat!!

    Ya just cant fix stoopid!!

  508. parkay
    Posted February 3, 2008 at 12:18 am | Permalink

    Travis Mullis, the father of the 3-month-old baby boy found dead next to the Galveston, TX seawall, after turning himself in to Pennsylvania police Friday, admitted to stomping his son’s head in.
    - – -

    The mutilated body of a newborn baby was found by a dog’s owner in St. Charles Parish, LA Thursday, within reach of his chained Labrador retriever.
    - – -

    A landscaper found a dead newborn baby boy, born alive hours before, in a garbage bag Wednesday morning in East Point, GA.
    - – -

    Regard for human life and dignity gets a lot lower in the USofA, after 35 years of legalized infanticide.

  509. Regular
    Posted February 3, 2008 at 2:22 am | Permalink

    My other sister used to have a problem with p–n emails being sent to her and spam programs downloaded to her computer. So I got her some nice software, virus protection, etc. and a nice little proggie called a keylogger. It records letter by letter what is typed on a computer unknown to the user.

    When I checked the times of the messages and the contents, I found that it was when my sister was a work. The times always occurred about 3pm or so, the time that school let out.

    It turns out that her son and his friend were visiting p==n sites when they got home from school. Not an uncommon practice among teenagers as I have since found out.

    Anyway, one particular sequence of letters recorded by the keylogger busted the identity of the perpetrator as he logged in on his email.

    Instead of telling my sister, I used the newly gained access I had to my nephew’s friends email account and sent him an email. I posted the details and how I would inform my sister, but his parents.

    The problem stopped. :)

    Oh yeah, a word to they wise, people unknown to you, can upload a keylogger program to your computer if you download from an unknown site. Then, they can become you.

  510. Regular
    Posted February 3, 2008 at 2:24 am | Permalink

    but his parents = and his parents

  511. Max
    Posted February 3, 2008 at 2:09 pm | Permalink

    So Regular,

    You know of any way that p**n could show up on a computer where the user hasn’t at one point visited one or more p**n sites?

    Chas is busted.

  512. Posted February 3, 2008 at 4:09 pm | Permalink

    Max — youre an idiot… all they need is a list of email addresses… which can be bought almost anywhere… I dont have po*n on my computer… I just get po*n emails… I send them to SPAM…

    Guess I am not busted on anything… Care to post MORE LIES???

  513. Max
    Posted February 3, 2008 at 5:22 pm | Permalink

    Oh Chas fess up.

    Stop the lily white innocent lamb routine.

    You made the mistake of complaining about this p*rn stuff on the blog, now you can’t retract it.

    You were too stupid to realize how the spammers work, and didn’t know that your lustin after hot lil girls on the Internet would ever be discovered.

    Repent Chas.

    If you believe in Jesus as your personal savior, are truly sorry, and confess your sins, you will be forgiven.

    Just don’t go to those sites anymore.

  514. J R
    Posted February 3, 2008 at 5:27 pm | Permalink

    Huh,

    The “lamb” reference again.

    James does that. AND ksgrm. Now Max.

    Told ya.

  515. Max
    Posted February 3, 2008 at 5:35 pm | Permalink

    Wow, very eloquent comment JR.

    You are simply amazing.

    I bask in the glow of your enlightened superior mind.

    Now go figure out how to take care of your own kid. I’m tired of paying for him. Why don’t you go pay for your own?

  516. J R
    Posted February 3, 2008 at 5:39 pm | Permalink

    Why don’t you share your secret for being a ward of the state James?

    At least I am still taking care of my kid.

    What happened to yours?

  517. Max
    Posted February 3, 2008 at 6:03 pm | Permalink

    JR,

    You’ve said on this blog that you can’t afford healthcare for your kid.

    I didn’t bring that up. YOU did.

    Answer to yourself.

    I answer to me. And I pay for healthcare for all 3 of my kids.

    Why don’t you take care of your own? You have so much time to blog, yet you can’t work?

    I’m tired of paying for you.

    Are you not tired of getting free handouts?

  518. J R
    Posted February 3, 2008 at 6:11 pm | Permalink

    All day to blog?

    Let’s do a post count of “Max” and James JM sometime and see what we get.

    I payed in for years for you James.

    How long have you been on the dole? About 20 years now?

    I get no aid myself and ask for none.

    Why can’t you just take your aid and leave it at that? Why project your feelings of inadequacy on others? Does it make you feel better about yourself there in your sisters basement?

  519. Posted February 3, 2008 at 7:16 pm | Permalink

    Max, if you could only READ… You would clearly see I complained about getting EMAILS for P*rn sites — YOU and James are the lying SOBS that are trying to make something of it — Please dont make me go pull my own posts about it… just admit that you are a lying SOB about it, and it will be over…

    I ALSO posted that the offensive emails had been sent to SPAM… AND to the IT guys at WEBlog…

    Now, do you still want to keep on with your LIES??? Or are you going to go back to your whining and groaning about Taxes???

  520. Posted February 3, 2008 at 7:18 pm | Permalink

    BTW, Max, WHY do you have this insane need to keep on lying almost daily about JR’s employment??

    There are WAY too many posts where JR has told all of us that he WORKS….

    So, do you want to keep THAT LIE going as well?? For somebody who likes to talk about JESUS, you sure like LYING!!

    Re: Max???

    D
    N
    F
    T
    T

  521. Max
    Posted February 3, 2008 at 10:45 pm | Permalink

    About the lies,

    I have no motivation to lie about Chas and his p*rn problem. Chas brought it up, I really don’t care.

    Lying about it? Who has motivation to lie about p*rn? The jerk-off who brought it up.

    As for JR, HE has admitted and whined about not having health insurance for his kid. I’m not lying about that.

    JR/Chas, goodbye. You are both sick. Seek help.

  522. Posted February 3, 2008 at 11:00 pm | Permalink

    Oh yeah, a word to they wise, people unknown to you, can upload a keylogger program to your computer if you download from an unknown site. Then, they can become you.

    *****

    Of course, that would mean that you have no internet security.

    So there’d be much easier ways to “be you” in that case . . .

  523. Posted February 3, 2008 at 11:30 pm | Permalink

    Max, nice try on the spin… I did not say ONE WORD about JR’s son… I asked you why you continue to LIE about JR’s employment!! Anybody reading this thing can easily see that… you’re not cute… its not funny when you so grossly fail to read what is typed clearly….

    I also stated CLEARLY that I was receiving P*rn EMAIL, Max… EMAIL…. NOT web sites, you ding a ling!!

    I really DO challenge your reading ability on this one…. You LIED about what I stated… NOW, you want to weasel out of it!!

    Pfffft!!! on you!!!

  524. Posted February 3, 2008 at 11:33 pm | Permalink

    HERE MAX YOU said to JR: “You have so much time to blog, yet you can’t work?”

  525. Posted February 3, 2008 at 11:37 pm | Permalink

    HERE YA GO MAX — Here is what YOU LIED about regarding my post about p*rn EMAILS —

    You INTENTIONALLY LIE about what my concern is… And MAX, old man, it aint about going to WEB SITES…. As YOU LIE ABOUT HERE!!

    READ WHAT YOU SAID MAX…. I never posted ONE WORD about visiting p*rn sites…. I griped about getting p*rn EMAIL you nut case… NOW READ HOW YOU MANAGED TO LIE ABOUT IT >>>

    “You were too stupid to realize how the spammers work, and didn’t know that your lustin after hot lil girls on the Internet would ever be discovered.

    Repent Chas.

    If you believe in Jesus as your personal savior, are truly sorry, and confess your sins, you will be forgiven.

    Just don’t go to those sites anymore.”

  526. Posted February 3, 2008 at 11:38 pm | Permalink

    As I said before, MAX… For somebody who likes to talk about Jesus like that, you really shouldnt be LYING about other people!!

    What is that one little thing about bearing false witness??? Hmmm???? LIAR!!

  527. Posted February 3, 2008 at 11:40 pm | Permalink

    good night max… i hope you will now stop lying… about ME… and about JR’s employment… If I was JR, I would be boiling mad at you over that!! How totally irresponsible of you!!

    Good night max… I do hope you sleep well with your lies!!

  528. J R
    Posted February 3, 2008 at 11:44 pm | Permalink

    Let it go Chas.

    “Max” is just another of James McCluer’s puppet nics.

    Like “American way” and “ksgrm” and who knows how many others.

    The only reason he isn’t posting now is I drove him to ground.

  529. Posted February 3, 2008 at 11:46 pm | Permalink

    JR — I dont think Max is one of James’s inventions… nor KsGrm… I tend to agree with you on American Way, and also Pat Herron…

    Hang in there!! I just get tired of seeing them tear you apart for not working EVERY DAY!!

  530. Posted February 3, 2008 at 11:48 pm | Permalink

    JR — I also get very tired of being LIED about every day on the Blog… Some day, it will be dealt with… I p0romise!!

18 Trackbacks

  1. By Jessie on February 7, 2008 at 9:16 am

    Jessie…

    There are varying schools of thought on your subject. I happen to agree with you – most of the time. Keep it up….

  2. By comic book sale increase on February 11, 2008 at 3:25 pm

    comic book sale increase…

    This enables authors to keep track of who is linking to, or referring…

  3. By Jack on February 12, 2008 at 10:59 am

    Jack…

    Thanks for the post. I couldn’t agree with you more….

  4. By Decide Allowance on February 14, 2008 at 7:31 am

    Decide Allowance…

    Very good blog thanks…

  5. By Jessie on February 15, 2008 at 7:02 am

    Jessie…

    Great post. I have added you to my digg bookmark…

  6. By Carol on February 15, 2008 at 9:12 am

    Carol…

    …This is because when you do exercise, your metabolism and your energy level increases……

  7. By Mortgage Lead Source on February 15, 2008 at 11:01 am

    Mortgage Lead Source…

    Here is a true saying ” For every girl with curves there are several…

  8. By Eric on February 15, 2008 at 7:06 pm

    Eric…

    Thought provoking post. Very interesting items and have enjoyed immensely. Please visit my site also….

  9. By Jessie on February 16, 2008 at 7:26 am

    Jessie…

    Thanks for sharing. I agree and would add that th…

  10. By factor fitness five on February 16, 2008 at 9:17 am

    factor fitness five…

    Hi! I’ve found your blog using google search engine while searching for ‘%KEYWORD%’ and your post regarding %TITLE% looks very interesting for me….

  11. By Computer Cases High Performance Computer on February 16, 2008 at 11:42 pm

    Basic information: How to choose quality laptop computer cases?…

    The following paragraphs summarize the basic knowledge about major factor that you should consider when choosing laptop case. The knowledge comes from direct experience of a person who is completely familiar with all the aspects. Heed the advice to avo…

  12. By Jessie on February 17, 2008 at 7:59 am

    Jessie…

    Thanks for the post. I couldn’t agree with you more….

  13. By Jessie on February 18, 2008 at 7:09 pm

    Jessie…

    and readers, Let?s DIGG this Blog post so we can get more blog posts FAST!! Good stuff….

  14. By dont pay taxes on February 18, 2008 at 10:15 pm

    dont pay taxes…

    Very interesting post. A little bit confusing, but still ok….

  15. By Eric on February 19, 2008 at 1:29 am

    Eric…

    There are varying schools of thought on your subject. I happen to agree with you – most of the time. Keep it up….

  16. By Married Gays on February 19, 2008 at 7:02 pm

    Married Gays…

    Reading the blog and the otherposts I see things that are close to home. I have added you to my digg account for bookmarking….

  17. By Jessie on February 20, 2008 at 11:03 pm

    Jessie…

    I love this web stuff!…

  18. By Jack on February 21, 2008 at 9:59 pm

    Jack…

    Ok, I’m not in complete agreement with this, but I see your point. Thanks for sharing….