Hillary Clinton wouldn’t say whether Bill Clinton went too far in campaigning for her, but she told ABC’s “Nightline†that she would be able to control him if she were president and that there wouldn’t be a dual presidency. “Campaigns get a little heated — we all know that,†she said. “But when you have to make the tough decisions. . . . I have to make the decision, I have to bear the responsibility, I have to look into the eyes of the American people and tell them why we’re doing whatever it is we have to do, and I am willing to bear that responsibility.â€
Registered?
Commenting on WE Blog now requires you to be a Kansas.com member. Use the links above to register, if you haven't already, or to log in.Contact us
Follow us
Daily Archives
-
Recent Comments
- Jed on Let immigrants run
- Regular on Open thread 11/23
- Regular on Open thread 11/23
- BlueJay on Open thread 11/23
- BlueJay on Open thread 11/23
- Freebird1971 on Open thread 11/23
- Freebird1971 on Open thread 11/23
- BlueJay on Open thread 11/23
- BlueJay on Open thread 11/23
- Freebird1971 on Open thread 11/23

60 Comments
And why would I think that MCCain is just a strawman to put in Clinton? The lemmings will follow.
Ann Coulter accusing anyone of lying is laughable, that aside I mentioned a few days ago that you have to take this whole anti-Mc Cain thing with a grain of salt. I just can not see them even if it is a slim chance of holding the White House. Giving that up, for now there needs to be a Republican candidate that if as Coulter allude to and the Democrats some how blow it. Can be elected and with Bi-Partisan votes that would be needed. Though for the life of me I do not see even Mc Cain being that. Shoot many disenchanted Democrats are saying they will vote for Paul, but even he could not gander enough swing votes to make it.
Well when they lose, they can blame not having a Consevative enough of a choice!
It took a Clinton to clean up after the first bush, it’s going to take two to clean up after the second!
The Clinton dual against the evil corporations, top wage earners and appeasers. We will take from you, and increase taxes for expanded social programs. I hope the demos all lose. Go Mitt
I’ve always thought Obama was just running interference for Hillary. This avoids any tough questions until later – Cattlegate, filegate, etc.
McCain is just the latest plan to assure a Liberal gets in the White House.
see, the neocons will never get it. The American people have chosen NON neocon x 3. With McCain, Hillary and Obama, the 3 front runners.
We really need to push for a Clinton/Obama ticket. After last night’s debate, I’m far more hopeful for that. Hillary truly shined last night and showed why she should be president.
There will be a restore to sanity in the White House. IF McCain does pull out a miracle and wins, I’ll hope that he’ll go back to being more workable and moderate than his rhetoric has shown- his straight talk express lost it’s wheels. I’ve never disliked McCain till recently.
When you wish upon Obama
Doesn’t matter who’s yo mama
Clinton fans they do diminish
As the Dems head toward the finish
Obama is a charming fellow
And lulls them with a voice so mellow
Hillary is pulling hair
Like she did when Bill was there.
So as we watch the oh eight race
Who will end up in that place
If the White House’s not so white
Clintons go back home to fight.
Romney is right about the Clintons’.
Why would America want to put Bill Clinton back in the White House with nothing to do . . . except hit on the interns?
Let’s pass the torch to a new generation and hope they don’t f*** it up like the Bush and Clinton dynasties have done.
“I’m asking you to believe not just in my ability to bring about real change Washington . . . but I’m asking in your ability to believe in yours.”
Barack Obama
Captain, I never thought you were the kumbaya type. Why now? Why do you want to play footsie with the republicans at THIS moment? Is it worth it to let the republicans run roughshod over us for another eight years just to satisfy your Clinton hate?
How’s that “inspiration” thingy working here with the cons on the blog? Why dont you try it for a couple of weeks and SEE how well it works? THEN judge if Obama’s rodney king schtick will work.
You need to read Ruth’s column today…
So outlander, were you the hateful poet yesterday too? You know, the one who called Obama a coon?
She can control Bill? Like she controlled his chasing interns in the Oval Office?
“So outlander, were you the hateful poet yesterday too? You know, the one who called Obama a coon?”- ksfrmgrrl
That is such a hateful speak
To accuse me of it is quite weak
You’ve hated him for quite a while
Posting that was more your style.
In all my taking of issue with obama, I have NEVER mentioned his race.
And you?
Oh, and btw, I think calling him a “coon” makes YOU lower than snake shit. It makes YOU low enough to walk under a closed door wearing a top hat.
A vote for the republicans is a vote for outlander’s race baiting.
Cant wait for November… I think we’ll see the ugly truth about republicans and race.
KFG: You are such a hater and such a liar. How dare you accuse me of that!! Honestly, how do you live with yourself?
Obama has a chance to be the first black president. It is brought up all the time. That doesn’t matter to me, one way or another.
But you who don’t dare mention a person’s race, are nearly as big a problem as someone who would call Obama that awful name that you seem to like to keep posting.
Honesty is the only way to deal with the race issue. Not walking on pins and needles scared to say anything for fear some hypocrit like you might pretend to be offended, on behalf of the candidate they despise.
“ksfarmgrrl” –
I addressed your comments before and you’ve ignored them.
When you post: “How’s that “inspiration” thingy working here with the cons on the blog?” you choose to ignore that the politics of George WMD Bush vetoes becomes moot once there’s a Democrat in the White House.
You choose to ignore that what you call “Obama’s Rodney King schtick” (which, by the way has racial overtones) is a total misrepresentation of of Barrack Obama’s appeal.
Your eggin’ for a fight. So’s “J R.” And I recognize the urge to cut off Tom DeLay’s head and s#it down his throat. Thing is, it doesn’t matter anymore. At least it won’t matter when a Democratic President of the United States is sworn into office on January 20, 2009.
Fight all the past wars you want, “ksfarmgrrl” and “J R,” but your passion to piss on Newt Gingrich’s legacy is yesterday’s news, yesterday’s issue.
We’ve seen in the Democratic primaries how Senator Clinton fights, and she’s backed off those tactics because *IT DIDN’T WORK!!* against Senator Obama. What makes you think Senator Clinton’s (albeit, admirable) ability to get down in the mud and fight is somehow going to be more effective than what (as you cutely refer as “Kumbaya” tactics) slapped Hillary and Bill down?
Obama’s approach is not (I repeat, but you guys have ignored this before) appeasement, but attraction. And, no, no amount of attraction is gonna win the Right Wing Reactionaries such as “Econ101,” or “Hank Price,” or “ksgrm,” or “Max,” et al. They are so far out on the fringe they think John McCain is too “liberal,”
There’s nothing in the Obama platform that anyone expects to attract the Reich Wing. You know that, I know that and, most importantly, Barrack Obama knows that.
But there are many traditional Republic Party adherents who’ve come to the realization that they haven’t left the Republic Party, the Republic Party has left them. And it’s left them with finding a candidate with a new paradigm for government.
Agreed MH – people like Hagel etc might make good allies. Unfortunately we have not see even 20% in the Senate – at least not yet.
Ah, the liberals are becoming quite crazy.
Their arguments are pointless and lazy.
With ad hominem attacks
and juvenile wisecracks
Their position is becoming quite hazy!
Outlander, you are posting the hateful poems, one of which said “coon”. It wasnt posted under your name, and I asked you this morning if you posted the hate poem. You answered yes, did you not? And then other poems about the white house not being white appeared under your name.
Perhaps you should read what you post?
And monkey hawk, I’m sorry, you keep pretending to answer my questions, but you dont. HOW is this attraction thingy gonna work? Yes, I know many rank and file republic moderates have switched parties IN KANSAS.
I have yet to see any such thing in Congress. The republics there stick together like glue. And I dont see the RNC changing it’s strong arm tactics with the “moderate” pelosi and reid, do you?
I am NOT ignoring what will happen with a dem in the white house. I think the dems may hold the majoirities in both the house and the senate this year, but I doubt they will be veto proof majoirities. Too many incumbents, too many solidly republic districts, etc.
SO… again, how will this “inspiration” and “attraction” thing work? WTF is obama going to offer them that will “attract them”? Even the moderates in congress. You really think Jerry Moran is gonna follow Obama? Dream on dude, dream on.
Again, you are big on inspirational words, low on explanations of what and how.
And another thing… you STILL have not answered my question if it would be ok for Obama to invite the KKK to headline one of his events and preach at the end? WOuld it be ok for Edwards to invite the skinheads to headline an even in Skokie and preach their hate for thirty minutes at the end?
Would those things be just a matter of “flavor” as you put it?
And btw, I do not think invoking “can we get along here” is racist. YOU are the one putting the racist label on it, not me. It is essentially what your candidate is saying, and offering NO concrete ways he is going to do it? I think you are smarting under the truth about your candidate and your not being able, or not being willing, to directly answer my two qustions.
But dance on brother.
Outlander, you are posting the hateful poems, one of which said “coon”. It wasnt posted under your name, and I asked you this morning if you posted the hate poem. You answered yes, did you not?
Um.. No. And you know it. Acting stupid and innocent doesn’t become you. Liar.
And btw Monkey Hawk, I’m not “itching for a fight” with the republicans in congress. I AM ITCHING for a progressive agenda to be SUCCESSFUL in congress.
And when the republics in congress DONT go along with obama’s kumbaya strategy? WTF is he gonna do?
Beg harder? Like sebelius, say “please” a few more times?
I think Clinton can extend a hand of friendship to them and I would not object one bit. Really. But if that gesture doesnt work?
I want a president who will push a progressive agenda with a stick if need be. I want a battlehardened leader who knows how to deal with the republics in a firm and forceful manner.
I do NOT want another democratic leader who promises appeasement.
I’m all for trying the play nice approach. I just think we have LOTS of evidence, even with majorities in both houses, that it doesnt work.
And when it doesnt work, (again)?
WTF is obama gonna do?
Get moveon or DU to help him? Heheheheh. I think we’ve seen how well that works.
Dream on monkey. While you pursue those dreams, please ANSWER my questions and stop dancing around the truth. Obama needs more experience, and he needs to get his nose banged up a little before he is ready to deal with the republics.
OH, and btw, it seems like the attack politics and division politics worked well enough for obama in South Carolina. I guess we can expect more of the same pitting one democratic constituency against another in the general election?
Dont tempt us to stay home…
“There’s nothing in the Obama platform that anyone expects to attract the Reich Wing.”
So… what is in the obama “platform” that will attract moderates to cross over and vote for him? And.. I might add, cross over and vote for him with MCCAIN, the ultimate moderate, as their nominee? If romeny is the nominee or huckster is the nominee, maybe he could attract the moderates. But McCain will KEEP the moderates. That’s why they are voting for him in the primaries. Duh.
I bet those moveon and DU posts will REALLY help obama with the moderates. Petraus anyone?
And what about obama’s platform will attract these moderate voters that is NOT also in the Clinton “platform”? “Inspiration”?
Here’s a clue dude. If McCain is the republic nominee, the “moderates” will stick with him. It will be the REICH wingers that stay home.
And that would be a bad thing.. how?
And one last bit of advise for you Monkey. Wishful thinking is not generally accepted as good political strategy…
So… Outlander…
Are you being trolled? Because you DAMN SURE posted this:
“So as we watch the oh eight race
Who will end up in that place
If the White House’s not so white
Clintons go back home to fight.”
This was your reply.
outlander
Posted February 1, 2008 at 12:43 pm | Permalink
“So outlander, were you the hateful poet yesterday too? You know, the one who called Obama a coon?”- ksfrmgrrl
That is such a hateful speak
To accuse me of it is quite weak
You’ve hated him for quite a while
Posting that was more your style.
To answer with another smart ass poem. I took that as an admission. I see now, after the fact, that others are posting smart ass poems, including you, that also contain race baiting.
If you didnt post “the coon” one, then I’m sorry.
Do you want to call out the person who did?
And I’m still not impressed with you posting this:
“If the White House’s not so white
Clintons go back home to fight.”
Exactly WHICH one of us is the racist liar here? Are you proud of that post?
Are you all getting your poems from the same place? You must be proud to be in such good company…
“ksfarmgrrl” offers –
“I am NOT ignoring what will happen with a dem in the white house. I think the dems may hold the majoirities in both the house and the senate this year, but I doubt they will be veto proof majoirities.”
Uhm. If there is a Democrat in the Oval Office, there is no reason for a “veto proof majority.”
Understand that?
Now, there may be an issue of a *fillisbuster-proof” majority in the Senate.
With that in mind, the practical political question is for Democrats to nominate a candidate who has coat tails. We know Senator Clinton is likely to unify a now-splintered Republic Party. And we know (as you’ve noted) “…many rank and file republic moderates have switched parties IN KANSAS.” And you assert that’s happened only in Kansas? Good luck with proving that.
As for your little “KKK” hypothetical; I understand how passionate you are about gender-preferance rights. And I’m on your side, “ksfarmgrrl.” You can bone-dig my comments in this forum and I’ll stand by all of them. It’s an issue for me, but not the deciding issue. Understand that?
I tend to not make good be the enemy of perfect.
If I want a candidate who agrees with me on each and every issue, I guess I’d better stand up and run for President myself. A rally in South Carolina, even with an idiot on the dais, doesn’t negate everything a candidate brings to the race.
And, I’m sorry. If you can brand Barrack Obama with “McClurkin,” I can brand you with “Rodney Smith,” whose name is most certainly a racist touchpoint in contemporary political discourse; just as McClurkin’s name is a touchpoint for gender-preference rights. Don’t go all “Econ101″ or “outlander” on me here, “ksfarmgrll.” They can plead ignorance (and their posts tend to prove it). You know better.
So outie, you didnt post this at 6:09pm yesterday?
“Clintons still play the same tune
saying how could you possibly vote for that coon
Nothing positive to offer about either one
no reasons to vote for anyone”
If not, I’ll expect you to be calling out the “person” who did. You sure have been following suit though… with the “white house not so white” poem.
Yes Monkey, I meant filliubuster proof, not veto proof. Sorry. But the point remains the same.
You still did not address the issue of McCain hanging on to the moderates and how obama expects to get crossover votes in the face of that.
And you still didnt answer the question about the KKK or the skinheads. I guess you will not.
And here is another clue buddy. Being condescending and patronizing is NOT answering the questions. Lumping me in with the reich wing isnt helping your case either.
And no, a liberal like me invoking Rodney King is not racist. I was in a mixed race relationship for four years, and I remain VERY close to her and her family. To try and paint me as a racist is not only condecending and patronizing, it’s damn insulting.
I think you are getting really mad here because you cant or wont directly answer my questions. Obama has appeal inside the democratic party. Not outside. Any moderate republicans on his team yet? Any moderate republic endorsements?
And isnt “perfect being the enemy of good” captain’s famous line?
Answer my questions monkey instead of changing the subject. I’m willing to bet you cant.
And yes, McClurkin is homophobic. Decidedly so. And obama invited him to headline an event in SC and preach for thirty minutes at the end.
Please note where I’ve said anything even remotely racist or endorsed an OPENLY racist person.
You just refuse to admit that obama has his problems with homophobia. He pandered to it to get the evangelical vote in SC. Like I said, Hillary had NEVER thrown one group of democrats under the bus to pander to another.
obama did. And that is the sad, sad, truth. I hope one of YOUR groups is not next.
“With that in mind, the practical political question is for Democrats to nominate a candidate who has coat tails.”
Please post an example of obama’s “coattails”. He hasnt run enough times to HAVE a track record of “coattails”. You are assuming facts not backed up by evidence.
And your answer to my KKK question? Is to change the subject and say YOU support gay rights.
Answer the freakin’ question. Would it be OK and no big deal like inviting the openly homophobic mccloset?
AND PLEASE, post some evidence of where moderate republicans, at the NATIONAL LEVEL have switched parties or votes to join obama.
Nice try at shifting the burden of proof. I said they didnt, and even the most novice debater knows you cant prove a negative. It is up to you to prove they have or will.
But hey, we are amused at your antics, and we do encourage you to try again.
Outlander posted a poem about Obama with the word COON in it?
OMG Outlander…I always knew you were an asshole, I just didn’t know you were SUCH a dick too.
See, Monkeyhawk, this is why we need a fighter like Hillary. If you think we can work with these types, you are sadly mistaken.
…and I see in your zeal to paint ME as a racist, you convieniently jumped over this question as well:
So… what is in the obama “platform” that will attract moderates to cross over and vote for him? And.. I might add, cross over and vote for him with MCCAIN, the ultimate moderate, as their nominee?
And… having the KKK on the dais would NOT be a deciding factor for you either? Get it dude, having a homophobe HEADLINE and event and PREACH at an event is not exactly “having him on the dais” now is it?
And.. it IS a deciding issue for me. HARDLY “inspirational” or “attractive” to someone who is really committed to equal justice for ALL.
Pmom, the “coon” poem was not under outlanders name, and I DID ask him if he posted the hateful poem. He gave ANOTHER poem as an answer. See why I was suspicious?
He damn sure did post the “white house” one though, unless he says he was being trolled.
And thanks for making the point. THAT is exactly why we need someone with Hillary’s experience, and success, at fighting the wingnuts.
Holding hands and saying “Please Mr. President wont you join us” is NOT gonna cut it. No matter who’s in congress or the white house.
I think it’s not US fighting the battles of the past. I want Hillary to fight the battles of the FUTURE.
Obama supporters just want to wish really hard that there wont BE any such battles.
hehehehehehehhehhehehheheheheheh….
I think that’s called whistling past the graveyard.
So outie, you didnt post this at 6:09pm yesterday?
“Clintons still play the same tune
saying how could you possibly vote for that coon
Nothing positive to offer about either one
no reasons to vote for anyone”
If not, I’ll expect you to be calling out the “person” who did. You sure have been following suit though… with the “white house not so white” poem.
_____________
I wonder why someone would keep posting that vile trash, unless they were proud of it? Are you the one who wrote it KFG? After all, you despise Obama. Is that an unfair assumption?
And please feel free to repost my actual poem/song. You know, the one complimentary of Obama and about the “white house being not so white”.
…and with that, I’m outta here.
I really hope capn, er monkey, er agnostic, or SOME obama supporter will answer my questions directly instead of changing the subject, putting an undeserved label on me, or dancing around the truth.
And I hope outlander will apologize for what he DID write and call out whoever wrote the coon poem.
But I’m not waiting…
While I know it is so early that polls don’t matter, it is interesting to note the results of the latest Fox News Poll as reported on http://www.realclearpolitics.com which show in a hypothetical head to head, Sen. McCain preferred over Sen. Clinton, and Sen. Obama preferred over Sen. McCain (I hasten to add a 1% delta in both cases, within the margin for error), and both of the Democratic front runners (remember, Mike Gravel hasn’t officially dropped out or suspended his campaign) soundly ahead of Gov. Romney. Just for information.
No Outlander, I did not and would NEVER post such a thing. That’s CRAZY.
WTF would make you think I’d ever do that? I have not posted anything racist here, including my QUOTE of Rodney King.
I have to go. Surely you can repost the WHOLE poem that talked about the white house not being so white.
Please outright deny posting the coon poem.
And if you dont approve of it, please call out the person who did post it.
ksfg – while I am still undecided about which of the two I will support after standing for Richardson I will make a ‘pro-Obama-Kumbaya’ observation: Might he be able to peel off 20% or so of the Republicans in Congress – especially the Senate? If so he would have a filibuster-proof working majority. That could be very important in getting legislation passed.
I am NOT talking about trying to get any of the Righties – just those that PaulTheCon etc call RINOs.
VT, with all due respect, the wingnuts havent really started working on obama yet. When they attack him like they have clinton, you may see those poll numbers change.
And btw, there was a poll out today showing AL Frankin ahead in his race. I dont have time for the link right now.
One thing I look to see is the ‘RINOs’ realize just how vicious the righties are with them calling McCain ’scum’ etc.
“Might he be able to peel off 20% or so of the Republicans in Congress – especially the Senate? If so he would have a filibuster-proof working majority.”
Ben, with all due respect, I havent seen any evidence of that 20% happening, or anyone predicting it will. Please post some evidence or credible prediction if you have it. I havent heard anyone predicting a filibuster proof majority either.
And I am gonna repeat something here. I hope the next president DOES extend an olive branch. But you had it right when you said “trust but verify”. I would rephrase that as “speak softly and carry a big stick”.
I just dont think obama has the experience or is creative enough to back up his pretty words with tough action if the olive branch or “inspiration” thing works.
I do NOT think ANYONE should march into congress and poke the republics in the eye with a sharp stick just to piss them off.
I just think we have to be prepared when Lucy pulls away the football again. And if I were in a fight for my life in this country? I’d want HILLARY by my side, not someone who is as inexperienced and invested in wishful thinking as obama.
And I repeat, I COULD support obama as VP. As the head of the senate, he could work on those “crossover votes” and “pealing off the 20%”.
I’m just not willing to take that gamble in his inexperience when the republics are on the ropes.
Obama’s inclusion of McClurkin on some of his campaign stops was clearly wrong, and he shouldn’t have done it.
Including a well-known openly gay dude for “counter-balance” didn’t work either.
But, FrmGrrl, you exaggerate greatly when you compare McClurkin to David Duke. Saying that the gay lifestyle is “wrong” is a lot different than supporting lynching somebody or maintaining a reign of terror over a minority community.
Not that it really matters, but it’s now an open secret that McClurkin didn’t “get over” his gayness. No surprise there.
If you listen to Obama’s message–it’s one of inclusion. Much more than Hillary’s has ever been.
And how’d those Clinton years work out for us all?
Open gay military service? No.
Legalized gay marriage or unions? No.
But if Bill couldn’t do it in 8 years, surely his wife will do it now, right?
Sorry. I don’t think so.
kfg, I know; that’s why I tried to make the point about it “being so early that polls don’t matter”. Al Franken ahead in his race for the DFL (those wonderful Minnesotans, don’cha know) nomination to run against Senator Coleman? Interesting.
No Outlander, I did not and would NEVER post such a thing. That’s CRAZY.
WTF would make you think I’d ever do that? I have not posted anything racist here, including my QUOTE of Rodney King.- KFG
—————
Well kfg, I feel the same way. I didn’t think you posted it. But why would you even ask me if I did? I don’t post racist crap either.
So, for the third time, I didn’t and wouldn’t post anything like the vile “coon” comment. I expect you to shut up now.
Sorry, but I think when push comes to shove, RINO or DINO or whatever, I think republic “blood” will be thicker than “crossover” water.
Political_mama
Posted February 1, 2008 at 3:11 pm | Permalink
Outlander posted a poem about Obama with the word COON in it?
OMG Outlander…I always knew you were an asshole, I just didn’t know you were SUCH a dick too.
——————
How does it feel to be KFG’s dupe Pmom?
WEll hell, I’m late now anyway. Here’s the link VT
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132×4332885
And captain, mcclurkin, mary mary, (donnie wasnt the ONLY homophobe on the agenda) kirbyjon caldwell, and the whole ex-gay hee haw gang ARE just as deadly and terrifying to gay people as the KLAN is to black folks. Or the skinheads are to the jewish community.
I’m sorry you cant see that. Homophobia is homophobia, and denying ANYONE equal protection under the law is toxic to democracy.
Dont think these buttholes are deadly? Maybe when you get to heaven, you can ask Matthew Shepard about it… Or Gwen Arujo, or Paul Broussard…
IF someone DID invite the KKK to PREACH and HEADLINE an event, would that matter to you? Or would you just gay perfect is the enemy of good?
Outie, wanna disavow the other poem you posted? Wanna call out the “person” who did post at 6:09 yesterday?
SOME wingnut posted it. Pmom’s point remains the same. She is hardly ANYONE’s dupe.
Still waiting on evidence of obama’s coattails or his ability to “crossover” 20 percent…
“A huge majority of Republicans want to win, and they would rather have victory than total litmus test purity,” he added.
From the Washington Post.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/01/AR2008020101141_2.html
There is also the assumption that McCain will appeal to independents. The Republicans seem to be betting that the electorate has moved further left than in the past. The question for McCain supporters is, if he loses the Republican base, can he still win in November? I say that would be unlikely.
I said it was wrong, FrmGrrl.
But I don’t hear McClurkin preaching violence against gays.
That would be toxic and beyond the pale.
BTW, the racial slur was used in a poem by Pat Herron, not outlander.
http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/01/are-obama-supporters-deluding-themselves/
Scroll down 4/5ths of the page to:
Tap Herroni
Posted January 31, 2008 at 6:09 pm
AND, KsFrmGrrl–
You never answered MY question about what did Clinton ever do for the GLTB community in eight years?
Captain, you really should learn to quit while you are ahead. Obama didnt JUST embrace the hateful mcclurkin, who has declared war on gays and says gays are “killing our children” but also marymary who compares us to murderers, and hezakiah walker who, well, look up for yourself what they have said.
Yes, I think declaring war on us is inciting violence. I think saying we are killing children and comparing us to murderers is inciting violence.
The ex gay movement has FREQUENTLY used violent tactics to “cure” people of “the gay”. Particularly young people. And gay teens have the highest rate of suicide of any cohort. SO yeah, I think mcclurkin and his bigoted pals ARE inciting violence, as does the whole ex gay movement.
David Duke’s MOVEMENT (KKK) incites violence even if HE personally doesnt. As does the whole nazi/skinhead movement. Would those be ok with you as long as their representatives didnt PERSONALLY reequest violence?
Dont believe me? Google Donnie McClurkin + killing our children.
Or better yet, read the red letters here…
http://www.nbjcoalition.org/news/nbjc-responds-to-obamadonnie.html
That, btw, is from the national black justice coalition.
And as for answering questions? Nice dodge again on mine by asking me to answer something.
you first.. or do you just want to dodge again?
And please, continue to give me a platform to illustrate why the obama campaign, as Mr. C said, is in serious need of adult supervision. If he and his folks make these kind of ROOKIE mistakes in the campaign…
…IMAGINE what he and his will do as preznit with his finger on the button.
And if obama wants to tout “judgement” over experience? WTF does THIS mcclurkin/marymary/hezakiahwalker crap say about HIS judgement?
Okay, fine, Ksgrm, I’m getting a better perspective on your opposition to Obama. I don’t like that he did it either, and it runs totally counter to his message.
I wasn’t the one who said that Obama had coat-tails. I have no idea how much influence he’ll have in Congressional races and cooperation. Will he have more or less influence on other races than Hillary?
Don’t know.
I have seen a lot more turnout for Dems in the primaries than Republics, and a lot of those folks must be independents, fired up for our side.
After that, it’s hard to say . . .
Cap your conversation is with Farmgirl not me. If McCain is the GOP candidate I am voting for Obama.
Hi ‘Granny’ :) – wondered how your name got in here!
Hey, KFG,
have your heard this one? My guitar teacher and I have figured out the tabs on this babe. It’s a great song and I think of you when I try to play it.
Artist: Prine John
Song: Other Side Of Town
Album: Fair and Square John Prine Sheet Music
John Prine CDs
Why do you always seem to criticize me
Seems like everything I do just turns out wrong
Why don’t you come on out and despise me
So I could pack my bag and baby I’d be gone
Remember when you used to call me honey
I’d turn around and call you honey too
You might think it’s a joke, but it ain’t funny
To hurt someone who’s so in love with you
A clown puts his makeup on upside down
So he wears a smile even when he wears a frown
You might think I’m here when you put me down
But actually I’m on the other side of town.
My body’s in this room with you just catching hell
While my soul is drinking beer down the road a spell
You might think I’m listening to your grocery list
But I’m leaning on the jukebox and I’m about half … way there
A clown puts his makeup on upside down
So he wears a smile even when he wears a frown
You might think I’m here when you put me down
But actually I’m on the other side of town.
I’m sittin’ on a chair just behind my ear
Playing dominoes and drinking some ice cold beer
When you get done talking I’ll come back downstairs
And assume the body of the person you presume who cares.
I’m across the river on the other side of town
In my mind I’m on the other side of town.
Peace,
Steven
Oh, right, Ksgrm.
Heh, that was a fairly significant error, wasn’t it?
My bad.
However, KsFrmGrrl, the fact that Ksgrm might vote for Obama.
Let THAT sink in . . .
Chords are: D, A, G, A7, – doing a Travis pick type finger style…
This is John Prine at his best. Time to hear it, KFG.
Here ya go Capn, Monkey Hawk, et al.
If you wont answer my questions about obama, I’ll answer YOURS about Hillary.
Senator Clinton has worked very hard for LGBT community throughout her political career.
Hillary opposed the Federal Marriage Amendment (FMA) and helped to defeat it twice on the floor of the United States Senate. The LGBT community and activists turned to Hillary Rodham Clinton in both 2004 and again in 2006 to help defeat the FMA.
While First Lady, Hillary broke with the Clinton Administration and called for the repeal of Don’t Ask Don’t Tell policy.
Senator Clinton has been a leader in the fight for increased AIDS funding and access to services for HIV positive and AIDS patients. Hillary wrote the Early Treatment for HIV Act that would allow states to provide Medicaid coverage to low-income individuals living with HIV.
Hillary Rodham Clinton supports a trans-inclusive Employment Non Discrimination Act (ENDA). She favors ending discrimination in the workplace against individuals based on sexual orientation and gender identity.
Hillary is also the strongest champion of full adoption rights for LGBT couples.
“Gay and lesbian couples are just as loving and nurturing as any other parents,” Clinton said. “Anyone who thinks children are better off in foster care or orphanages than in a home where they are cared for and loved by a same-sex couple just doesn’t understand a child’s best interest.”
Hillary Clinton has a proven track record of working for us! That’s the lady I want as my President! If you live in one of those all important “Super Tuesday” states, then I encourage you to go out and support a candidate who really supports our community. The gay community MUST get behind Hillary Clinton!
http://gaysocialites.com/2008/01/the_gay_community_must…
And here is the guy obama invited to be on HIS stage at HIS event.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1dUp16hFzY8
Like I said, I hope it isnt one of YOUR groups obama throws under the bus next.
7 Trackbacks
[...] WE Blog » The Wichita Eagle Editorial Department Blog wrote an interesting post today on No dual Clinton presidencyHere’s a quick excerptNo dual Clinton presidency Posted23 minutes ago Hillary Clinton wouldn’t say whether Bill Clinton went too far in campaigning for her, but she told ABC’s “Nightline” that she would be able to control him if she were president and that there wouldn’t be a dual presidency. “Campaigns get a little heated — we all know that,” she said. “But when you have to make the tough decisions. . . . I have to make the decision, I have to bear the responsibility, I have to look into the eyes of the American p [...]
cain…
Hi. I think you have a really nice blog?….
Eric…
Thanks for the nice read, keep up the interesting posts…..
Hillary Clinton On Gay Marriage…
Reading the blog and the otherposts I see things that are close to home. I have added you to my digg account for bookmarking….
Mineral Makeup: The New Trend…
The latest trend in the cosmetic business is mineral face makeup. This organic makeup is promoted to be a better and healthier alternative than traditional makeup. Certain ingredients which are considered irritants are omitted from the development of m…
Pee Female Pee Pee Hole…
I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view…
Jack…
Great post. I have added you to my digg bookmark…