Kansas Republicans go for the underdog

huckabeeleaningright2.jpgKansas has preferred the GOP nominee in every November presidential election since 1964, but Kansas Republicans clearly aren’t ready to fall in line behind all-but-crowned nominee John McCain in 2008. Their huge endorsement of Mike Huckabee (in photo) in today’s caucuses made a point — that McCain isn’t reliably conservative enough for them, no matter how much praise Sen. Sam Brownback heaps on him.
It’s difficult to see what Huckabee’s Kansas caucus win serves, other than perhaps his prospects of being McCain’s best pick for vice president. (The former Baptist preacher sees it differently, of course, as best expressed by the quote of the day: “I didn’t major in math. I majored in miracles, and I still believe in them.”) And where does it leave Huckabee’s Kansas supporters in November? Will they stand with McCain or stay home?
Praise is due the Kansas Republican Party for its savvy decision to schedule the caucuses just four days after Super Tuesday, resulting in Wichita visits by McCain and Huckabee, national media attention and strong turnout.

93 Comments

  1. RD
    Posted February 9, 2008 at 6:08 pm | Permalink

    I’m not surprised. After all, that RR has strong roots in Kansas, witnessed by our battle over Evolution v. Creationism.

    But it will be interesting come November, or even in July(?) when we learn just who will be the Republican nods for Pres and VP.

  2. kelly
    Posted February 9, 2008 at 6:13 pm | Permalink

    If the numbers I have been seeing on CNN are correct, about 18,000 Republicans voted in their caucus today. I understand 37,000 Democrats participated in our caucuses on Tuesday. I thought that this was an overwhelmingly Rep state? The news media is reporting that “thousands” have turned out today to participate, but it is illusory. It is easy to assemble a few thousand when two entire counties must appear at one location to caucus. The Democratic Party had 5 locations in Wichita on a blizzarding night, and all of them were bursting at the seams with participants. And some residents of Sedg Cty had to go to El Dorado, and many others had to go to Newton. The fact that Huckabee prevailed is additional evidence that a lot of Reps stayed home.

    Though I am a Democrat, I think the news media is being a little too kind to the Republican Party in giving the report of “long lines” and “thousands” participating. At one location, sure, there were a lot of people at Century II. But even a phone booth looks jammed when you put 12 skinny people in it.

  3. Regular
    Posted February 9, 2008 at 6:23 pm | Permalink

    Democrats traditionally outnumber Republicans in caucus, this is nothing new.

    Perhaps Democrats are thinking in terms of the popular vote yet once again that will win the election. :D (shoots electoral college arrow)

  4. lindainks55
    Posted February 9, 2008 at 6:32 pm | Permalink

    It’s OK kelly – they need a little kindness today. It really must be at least a tiny blow to their pride to be outnumbered by upstart Democrats in THEIR state! And, what will be important is next November. Let’s keep the enthusiasm going – there is much to be done and we will be so strongly united by the fall!

    Of course, there will be some who will choose to make excuses and justifications. ;-)

  5. mrcontroversy
    Posted February 9, 2008 at 6:33 pm | Permalink

    From cjonline.com:
    U.S. Sen. Sam Brownback, R-Kan., urged caucus participants to consider McCain’s conservative voting record on abortion, defense and other issues. Brownback said McCain, a U.S. senator from Arizona who was a prisoner of war in Vietnam, would be the first president since Dwight Eisenhower to have extensive military credentials.

    “We’re at war and we’re going to be at war for a generation,” Brownback said.

    Now, that’s a heartwarming thought.

  6. Econ101
    Posted February 9, 2008 at 6:43 pm | Permalink

    RD
    Huck has not ever been a purist on the evolution/creation debate. He has not objected to the teaching of evolution.
    Actually, schools in Arkansas were rated at the bottom of national performance lists, under Bill Clinton.
    Schools in Arkansas now rate towards the top, in national tests and surveys.

    kelly
    The Republican contest is, pretty much, over, therefore this turnout WAS important.
    We turned out primarily for the turnout, itself. We knew McCain would win, nationally.

    Also, most of our attendies drove FAR more miles, to get to the Republican caucus. The State Senate District Caucuses were closer, neighborhood events.

  7. Posted February 9, 2008 at 6:56 pm | Permalink

    * John McCain carried Bob Dole’s caucus site in Russell County, and tied in a nearby caucus site in Trego County.

    * Ron Paul beat John McCain at three caucus sites: Brown County (16.8%), Gray County (12.1%), and Pottawatomie County (28.4%)

    * Saline County had 38% of the ballots cast for Rudy Giuliani, with more votes (13) than Johnson County (10).

    Pictures from Sedgwick County’s Caucus:
    http://nataliespianostudio.com/blog/2008/02/09/kansas-gop-caucus-report/

  8. Econ101
    Posted February 9, 2008 at 6:57 pm | Permalink

    By the way, Kansas Republicans don’t really “caucus” in the true meaning of the term.

    We have the only “secret ballot caucus” in the country, I think.

    Also, DELEGATES are the name of the game here.

    Major overhauls of the Reagan Republican Platform are unlikely, if McCain does not a floor fight.

    —-
    Speaking of floor fights, how do the Democrats “make every vote count” in Florida, now?

    Michigan and Florida voters are about to be “supressed” by the Democrat Party, aren’t they?

    Since Hillary “won” in Florida and Michigan, expect the following:

    The “Super Delegates” get together with Clintons urging and allow the Michigan and Florida Delegates to be seated. In return, the Super Delegates are released to vote as they wish, regardless of previous pledges.

    Hillary wins a majority this way, I am thinking.

  9. Econ101
    Posted February 9, 2008 at 7:00 pm | Permalink

    If McCain does not want a floor fight —

  10. J R
    Posted February 9, 2008 at 7:03 pm | Permalink

    heh HEH!

    The Republican party is like a balloon you blow up and let go.

    It goes pffffft bouncing all over the room and lands in that dusty, forgotten spot behind the couch.

    Say it with me 2To1! 2To1! 2To1!

  11. bloggus
    Posted February 9, 2008 at 7:16 pm | Permalink

    Final caucus numbers from Kansas-

    Democratic turnout on February 5th: 37,089

    Republican turnout today: 20,009

    LOL

  12. Posted February 9, 2008 at 7:33 pm | Permalink

    “Speaking of floor fights, how do the Democrats “make every vote count” in Florida, now?”

    You deal with the Republicans, Con, the Democrats will take care of the Democrats.

    By prior agreement, Florida and Michigan “delegates” do not count.

    Keep your nose out.

  13. Political_mama
    Posted February 9, 2008 at 7:37 pm | Permalink

    It shows Kansas Republicans are extremist.

  14. Political_mama
    Posted February 9, 2008 at 7:43 pm | Permalink

    bloggus, post those numbers again!

    Wow. In Kansas. During a snowstorm.

    By the way, I already heard the best excuse…because the republicans had to work today lol…that’s why the turnout was so bad.

  15. lindainks55
    Posted February 9, 2008 at 7:53 pm | Permalink

    Paul, Only speaking for myself but I would have preferred driving to Butler County on a clear Saturday morning to the much-closer drive last Tuesday evening. And, after the caucus I wouldn’t have minded cleaning sunshine from my car. But, I would have driven all the way to Butler County in the dark and in a blizzard if that is what it took to get there. It really is that important to me! I am sad, worried, embarrased by what bushco has done to our country. I’m even worried about what additional harm can be done in the next months. I’m not trying to be argumentative when I tell you this has been the worst I’ve ever seen in my sixty years.

    On the Florida and Michigan delegates — I’m bothered by that situation. My first hope is those delegates aren’t needed for a clear-cut decision on the nominee. If that doesn’t happen, I hope it’s done in an above board way that considers the votes of those Democrats who went to the polls in those states. I’m also bothered by the whole “Super Delegates” stuff. I really need to do some research on both situations as I don’t understand them well enough.

  16. lindainks55
    Posted February 9, 2008 at 7:54 pm | Permalink

    Becuase we ALL know there are NO Democrats who work second shift! /sarcasm

  17. J R
    Posted February 9, 2008 at 8:10 pm | Permalink

    Florida and Michigan were quite rightly treated when they moved their primaries up.

    The race to be first was getting out of control. At least the Dems addressed it. If it were to keep up, we could be primaring for the next candidate years in advance of the next election!

    But Florida and Michigan must NOT be entirely denied a voice.

    Some have called for new primaries. That’s the best solution. For at least this year, it gives Florida and Michigan even MORE power than if they had been counted earlier.

    But failing that, the delegates MUST be seated.

  18. J R
    Posted February 9, 2008 at 8:23 pm | Permalink

    I called Kansas in the GOP race even BEFORE Romney dropped out. After Willard bailed, the race here was a lead pipe cinch.

    Now keep in mind my fellow Dems., the Kansas GOP caucus was SECRET. It was not like ours where you wore your vote on your sleeve and fought it out loud.

    The cons wrote a name on a secret slip of paper.

    There is MUCH to learn from that and today’s results.

    It teaches us that McCain will fare VERY badly in Kansas if he is the nominee. It tells us also that the Romney voters have completely given up, which surprised me given WIllard hasn’t actually quit. And I honestly thought given the state of things that Ron Paul would do better, maybe even beat McCain.

    Given these results, a well named Democrat should seriously consider a Senate run.

    I haven’t seen a blue or even a purple Kansas in my lifetime. Today’s results bring me hope.

  19. lindainks55
    Posted February 9, 2008 at 8:46 pm | Permalink

    There are a whole bunch of us who are hopeful — no mater who we “stood for” last Tuesday! Let’s guard against being overly confident. We must not ever rest on any laurels. This is way too important!

  20. Tony
    Posted February 9, 2008 at 9:14 pm | Permalink

    Go figure… Kansas Republicans voted for the most conservative person on the ticket…

    Who didn’t see this coming?

  21. Tony
    Posted February 9, 2008 at 9:15 pm | Permalink

    I am supprised that Ron Paul did as well as he did…

  22. ksagnostic
    Posted February 9, 2008 at 9:19 pm | Permalink

    This result may be clearest indication that moderates really are abandoning the Kansas Republican Party.

    However, if McCain is still the nominee, don’t make the mistake of thinking that McCain won’t get a lot of votes here.

    But it may be competitive if the CR stays home.

    BTW, if people think that it would be a great idea if McCain puts Huckabee on the ticket, I suspect not.

    That will just switch who stays home. Don’t think that Susan Wagle’s presence on the GOP ticket in 2006 didn’t cost them some potential votes from conservative but non-CR voters.

    Like I said, Kris Kobach is probably feeling pretty good about this outcome even as he helps to make the Democrats in Kansas relevant again.

  23. lindainks55
    Posted February 9, 2008 at 9:23 pm | Permalink

    What amazes me is what the word “Conservative” means today! Without the word “Social” in front of it, it hardly describes today’s definition of the word! It certainly doesn’t mean what it did not too many years ago!

  24. Political_mama
    Posted February 9, 2008 at 9:36 pm | Permalink

    I wish I could be happy. But I’m not. I feel bitter and resentful towards Obama. The more I hear him talk about hope, the more I wanna reach through that screen and shake him to talk about something IMPORTANT like Hillary does.

    I just think he just pulled the rug out from under her, sabotaged her. Intentionally even.

    I’ve been right in the last 3 elections on what will go down after they’re elected. I hope I’m wrong about Obama. So anyone out there, mark my words, save them. If Obama gets in the white house and then screws it up from lack of experience, or worse, pandering to republicans, I’ll say yet again…”I TOLD YOU SO”.

  25. Posted February 9, 2008 at 9:37 pm | Permalink

    JR — Kansas was at least prtly blue when we had Slattery in the House, Carlin in Governor’s ofice, and Glickman in DC with Slattery… We also had Joan Finney as Treasurer, and for many years, George Docking was Governor… Kansas has had its moments!! Not recently, but we have had them!!

  26. outlander
    Posted February 9, 2008 at 9:40 pm | Permalink

    Glad to see a message was sent. Huckabee is the most personable and competent of the remaining candidates. He is probably a little too controversial in a couple of areas so the nomination is probably out of the question.

    But I hope he ends up as the VP. Huckabee is an excellent campaigner. And he has accomplished what he has on a shoestring budget.

  27. Kansas
    Posted February 9, 2008 at 9:40 pm | Permalink

    PMom-

    It’s far from over. Hillary has a mission far greater and more important than Obama’s. I believe she will succeed.

  28. Political_mama
    Posted February 9, 2008 at 9:45 pm | Permalink

    Huckabee is a total POS. Figures you would vote for him.

  29. outlander
    Posted February 9, 2008 at 9:47 pm | Permalink

    Nice mom. You are a great example. Of intolerance.

  30. J R
    Posted February 9, 2008 at 9:50 pm | Permalink

    I hear lots of crap about “Hope” coming from Obama.

    But I don’t hear any ideas.

    I’m with you political mama. The guy gives me a bad feeling. I CANNOT vote for him UNLESS there is a proven, grown up Democrat on the ticket.

    Obama supporters must therefore ask themselves:

    Who do you want on our side? Do you want the steadfast, head on fighters?

    Or do you want to turn your back on them to embrace a lot of squishy moderates and lost Republicans.

    Hell ALL the Republicans are lost. Just because a few of them stagger Obama’s way doesn’t mean we should trust them.

  31. J R
    Posted February 9, 2008 at 9:53 pm | Permalink

    Consider how lost the Republicans are.

    Huckabee is winning today. But just YESTERDAY, the Republican Governor of Texas called Huckabee and asked him to quit!

    We do NOT have to work with these people as Obama asks us to. We can run over them just like they have run over America these last many years.

  32. Phantom
    Posted February 9, 2008 at 9:55 pm | Permalink

    Senator Roberts must be sweating bullets after today’s turnout!

  33. Phantom
    Posted February 9, 2008 at 9:57 pm | Permalink

    It appears there is a non violent revolution underway! People want their old America, and its values back.

  34. Posted February 9, 2008 at 9:57 pm | Permalink

    “We do NOT have to work with these people as Obama asks us to. We can run over them just like they have run over America these last many years.”

    JR — Seriously, wont that just lead to the furtherance of the intolerable gridlock we have now?? Somebody has to step up, and offer the olive branch at some point!!

  35. Posted February 9, 2008 at 9:58 pm | Permalink

    Senator Roberts needs to sweat a few bullets :-)

  36. J R
    Posted February 9, 2008 at 10:03 pm | Permalink

    Olive branch? TO hell with that.

    The ONLY thing a con understands is naked merciless force. They deal in it and it needs dealt back on them.

  37. WhiteElephant
    Posted February 9, 2008 at 10:08 pm | Permalink

    We’re at war and we’re going to be at war for a generation,” Brownback said.

    Now, that’s a heartwarming thought. mr.contreversy
    ——————————————————-

    We’ll be in Iraq for at least 10 more years, the Democrats will call a withdrawal, while they keep a substantial number of troops there. It will sound like we withdrawn from Iraq, but we will still be there for a long time with a lot of troops. We’re not gonna leave Iraq and let it be taken over by another dictator, or worse yet an islamo fascist. It will be a long time before Iraq can take care of their selves. Thats the cost of underestimating such an under taking.

  38. outlander
    Posted February 9, 2008 at 10:12 pm | Permalink

    The ONLY thing a con understands is naked merciless force

    ————–

    What?

    JR, you better be careful, or you will become a caricature. Or it may be too late.

  39. J R
    Posted February 9, 2008 at 10:17 pm | Permalink

    You already are a caricature outlander.

    The not rich man who votes Republican. The “pro life” zealot who opposes health care for kids.

    What is it that is broken in you?

    I don’t see you as I portray the evil Republican above outlander.

    You just are way late figuring things out.

  40. outlander
    Posted February 9, 2008 at 10:27 pm | Permalink

    JR, you are misrepresenting (or lying) when you say that I oppose health care for kids. Not that it matters a whit.

    Is it possible for you to stick to facts or even opinions and stay away from falsehoods? Otherwise, I’m not going to waste my time in discussing issues with you.

  41. Econ101
    Posted February 9, 2008 at 10:28 pm | Permalink

    Slattery and Finney
    Good PROLIFE Democrats, lol

  42. Posted February 9, 2008 at 10:29 pm | Permalink

    The Kansas Huckleberrys vote for Huckabee.

    Of course.

  43. Posted February 9, 2008 at 10:32 pm | Permalink

    Hey, Econ–

    Have you started chawing tobaccy and handling snakes at church?

    How are you going to fit in with your fellow Republicans?

  44. J R
    Posted February 9, 2008 at 10:33 pm | Permalink

    I really don’t care outlander.

    Or did you not get that I consider your side unreachable?

    I have, upstairs paid my respects to YOUR candidate Huckabee.

  45. Econ101
    Posted February 9, 2008 at 10:39 pm | Permalink

    Hillary Clinton’s postions are much more conservative than Obama’s positions, on the issues.

    Hillary takes far more money from Business PAC’s than does Obama.

    Again, JR, Obama should be your guy, based on issues.

    There has to be something else that drives you, since the issues don’t justify your vote.

    Oh, yah, you told us: Obama doesnt want to destroy Republicans, or something to that effect.

    Well, Hillary works with Republicans all the time.

    I will laugh very hard, should Hillary get elected.

    She has already said that she intends to garnish your wages, since you refuse to buy your own health insurance.

    That will be funny!

  46. American Way
    Posted February 9, 2008 at 10:42 pm | Permalink

    My observations of today’s huckleberry vote.

    In my caucus place, most of the other candidates had designated a speaker. The candidates designated speaker was given ten minutes to speak. (if he/she took less, others could speak – one minute each).

    huckleberry had NO designated speaker.

    HOWEVER (and that’s a big HOWEVER, comma, pause for effect), immediately ten speakers walked up to the front and were ready to speak.

    Each of the ten:

    1. Spoke exactly for one minute
    2. Each covered a different aspect of huckleberry
    3. No one covered/repeated a point of a previous speaker.
    4. All made points which drew applause (whether it meant something connected to Huck or not)

    My conclusion: This was staged. Huckleberry made it look like the “average joe” was his supporter.
    Very effective.

    It would be interesting to hear if my observations were repeated elsewhere in Kansas.

    WEBLOG editors/newspaper reports?

  47. Econ101
    Posted February 9, 2008 at 10:44 pm | Permalink

    Capn
    The truth is, I am Catholic and you are a bit bigoted, in your reference to Evangelicals.

    The Democrat Webpage actually cautions Democrats, when calling into talk radio shows, by telling them that talk radio listeners are:

    Smarter than average Americans
    Make more money than average Americans
    Have more education than average Americans.

    The same can be said of Conservative Christians.

    Trying to lump people into stereo-typical categories doesnt work very well.

    I am sure that I could find a tobacco chewing snake handler who likes Hillary. What, in the world, would that prove?

  48. lindainks55
    Posted February 9, 2008 at 10:45 pm | Permalink

    AmWay, They let you into your caucus as an observer? Ya know, since you went last Tuesday and gave the speech and all in order to get votes for Obama.

  49. J R
    Posted February 9, 2008 at 10:48 pm | Permalink

    Yeah paulie?

    Tend your own party. I don’t take suggestions from you on who to vote for.

    Actually, I DO take you suggestions into consideration and do exactly the opposite.

    November is gonna be a nasty time for you paulie. I am so looking forward to it!

  50. ksagnostic
    Posted February 9, 2008 at 10:58 pm | Permalink

    I am sorry, but some of you (JR, political mom, and yes ksfarmgrrl) are getting way over the top about Barack Obama.

    I mean, how dare an ambitious politician run against another ambitious politician! You’d think that Barack Obama is the stealth candidate of the conservatives the way some people talk.

    The race between Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama is a tough race. No dumb neophyte is going to beat Hillary Clinton. If Obama does it, it is a good sign going into the race for president.

    I for one am very impressed with both.

  51. ksagnostic
    Posted February 9, 2008 at 10:58 pm | Permalink

    And I also think that Hillary Clinton, should she win out against Barack Obmama, will be the better for it.

  52. American Way
    Posted February 9, 2008 at 11:01 pm | Permalink

    “AmWay, They let you into your caucus as an observer?”

    Very good observation Linda. But yes, I was present as a nonvoting person. But a very attentive one.

  53. Posted February 9, 2008 at 11:06 pm | Permalink

    AmWay probably couldn’t get the convoluted rules and regulations about how far in advance he had to register and how many pieces and what types of ID he needed to have to register for the RepubliCON caucus.

    So he had to go as an “observer.”

    I love it.

  54. Phantom
    Posted February 9, 2008 at 11:08 pm | Permalink

    I think what we’ve seen is that the ultra-conservatives that have in the recent past taken over the Republican pary were out en masse, the moderates stayed home in large numbers. Which leads me to the following assumptions.
    1. The moderates are content to let the Ultra Cons. control who the nominee is, and will support whoever; Or
    2. The moderates have had enough of War and enough of the Ultra cons.(embodied in Huckster), and will either abstain from voting in the next election, or join forces with the dems. to bring about much needed change.
    Let us pray, it’s No. 2!

  55. writerdog
    Posted February 9, 2008 at 11:08 pm | Permalink

    I guess as the saying goes that ever small victory is still a victory! I heard that about some really meaningless occurrence in Iraq recently. Its not sour grapes just facing the reality of unless the Democratic nominates does something that totally turns the country against them Oh like invading a country that did nothing to us…I know now stop that snickering! The GOP candidate has no chance of winning in Nov.
    Quite a few Republicans are facing that reality so why go to the Caucus?

    I went for Ron Paul, did I think he would win not really but its like has been pointed out about any close race. “Every vote may count”, how would I have felt after all my support for him if he had lost by one vote? And as my friend KFG has pointed out ( If I was a woman I would kiss you lady! I would still kiss you between friends.) my intent is to try and save the party from within and in a bigger effect save the country too. You can find it hard to believe but Republicans are not monsters! In the claim clear light of day they can talk without bias and often make perfect sense. As you maybe aware of, before the Caucus Ksgrm, Hank and myself met for breakfast. None of us were born with silver spoons in our mouths and me being me I would not have a silver spoon since the regular old metal ones work just as good! All of us were born into working families and if we have anything it is because of simple work. All have fallen flat on our faces and pick ourselves up having to start over again. Often its a matter of choices in life whether you have something or not. And yes choice! If you find you don’t see any you make them for yourself that’s part of the wonder of the United States. As a good man said, (and I paraphrase) “ with a roofing hammer and a ladder no one is out of work. You can find the work actually comes to you!”. That’s not saying that a Democrat is not a working person, I have known too many for that to be true (again look at my friend KFG). I would wage that when Democrats come together they too have similar stories of successes and failures, of falling flat only to have to pick themselves up. It the human story and has nothing what so ever to do with a party affiliation.

    But there is two ways to look at someone having something you do not. Either you can complain that life just isn’t fair and they must have done something wrong else you would have it too. Or you can say to yourself that you can have it too if you really want it. Hell people on welfare look at my house and want to give me money! But its because I have chosen this life not that I can not have better( I still play the lottery, maybe I puts some wheels on this here Place!).

    Back to my point, I see the Party partisanship as having more destructive power to this country then Bin Laden with a couple of Nukes. For the Democrats good on ya, you guys are seeing a light at the end of the road and are excited. You have every right to be and it is a natural thing it seems as both party have a tendency to destroy their runs in power. It is just your turn in the barrel till the country has enough and votes the Republicans back in. I will let you in on a secret, both parties tend to have a crappy element to them and it would be better all around if we think of America first instead of a party affiliation. Yes it can be hard to do with all this back and forth and the hateful words that seem to never stop. Who started it first? That is like who started the shooting first. When everyone is dead that does not even matter? But sadly by that time a lot of good people have been harmed. OK Chas its your turn on the soap box…

  56. Posted February 9, 2008 at 11:08 pm | Permalink

    KSagnostic–

    Hillary is certainly stealing his most popular themes.

    After he won in Iowa, the next thing ya know, Hillary’s people are all carrying “change” signs.

    Yeah, right.

    Change from what? 8 years of Clinton?

  57. American Way
    Posted February 9, 2008 at 11:12 pm | Permalink

    “So he had to go as an “observer.”
    I love it.”

    CapnAmerica, you need to get a life. Why attack me personally?

    If you would take the time to read what I have posted over the last month, you would know I deliberately voted for Obama. I had to register as a democrat (I posted I almost puked). I knew full well that 25 January was the last date to be registered as a republican to vote today. I gave that up. Why? If you read my previous posts you would know why. Laugh all you want. I did the same while speaking on behalf of Obama.

  58. lindainks55
    Posted February 9, 2008 at 11:13 pm | Permalink

    Oh no, CapN, AmWay CHANGED her/his registration so s/he could go influence Democrats to caucus for Obama! Gave a speech that brought tears to the eyes of the listeners! S/He knew well in advance s/he wouldn’t also be able to vote in her/his Republican caucus. S/He has, of course, already started the process of once again changing her/his registration. And, further more, MOST of the new registrations at the Democratic Party caucus were people doing exactly what s/he did!

    /sarcasm

  59. American Way
    Posted February 9, 2008 at 11:15 pm | Permalink

    Writer Dog: Could you please let me know if Huckleberry had a designated speaker at your caucus location?

    It is difficult for anyone not established as left to get a point across here (without being flamed).

    But I am curious if my observations hold true throughout Kansas.

    Thank-you.

  60. J R
    Posted February 9, 2008 at 11:17 pm | Permalink

    My latent respect for you makes me withold comment writerdog.

    Except to say that you were not, today, in the company of friends.

  61. writerdog
    Posted February 9, 2008 at 11:18 pm | Permalink

    I would wager

  62. Posted February 9, 2008 at 11:18 pm | Permalink

    Really, AmWay?

    Where was your caucus location?

    I’ll tell you mine if you tell me yours first.

  63. Posted February 9, 2008 at 11:19 pm | Permalink

    Oh, to heck with it, mine was at the WSU Metroplex.

    Didn’t see you give any speeches . . .

  64. lindainks55
    Posted February 9, 2008 at 11:20 pm | Permalink

    AmWay, there were NO speakers at my caucus of the Democratic Party. You, of course, were in a very special one where you gave a speech that brought tears to the listeners eyes. We had a few people attending who were “undecided,” and a few people went to them and invited them to join supporters of both Clinton and Obama. They asked some questions before making their choice of who to “stand for.” But we had no speakers. Guess not all caucuses are created equal? It was sooo crowded and rather disorganized and then we couldn’t all be in one room because of space constraints. Perhaps that’s what made the difference?

  65. American Way
    Posted February 9, 2008 at 11:21 pm | Permalink

    “will let you in on a secret, both parties tend to have a crappy element to them and it would be better all around if we think of America first instead of a party affiliation.”

    Damn WriterDog, sounds an awful lot like my previous posts over time, that those in power want us on two teams (like football). That is how they stay in power and keep us divided. I’ve also posted that I don’t think we are all “evil” and we are not all “religious right”.

  66. J R
    Posted February 9, 2008 at 11:24 pm | Permalink

    You are a liar “American way” Regular.

    There were no speakers at any local Democratic caucus.

  67. American Way
    Posted February 9, 2008 at 11:27 pm | Permalink

    Capn America, I prefer to keep my personal life, well personal. If you go back and read my posts, I am very interested and directly involved in Kansas politic’s. I am very concerned where the “red” is going and am excited to pass on state house news – regardless of party affiliation.

    I am honest in my posts. WE may be 180 degrees in opposition, but I have no reason to falsely post.

    Admittedly, I am also quick to temper and flaming. But some of that can be attributed to my personal background.

    But I do not HATE or “lump” liberals into one mold and I do not believe you are “evil”.

  68. American Way
    Posted February 9, 2008 at 11:29 pm | Permalink

    Writer Dog can attest to his caucus today, as to republican speakers – and what the state republicans allowed.

    I am not sure who on the democrat side can attest to the process in the democratic caucus.

    I do know for certain – what I said and to whom I said it.

  69. Political_mama
    Posted February 9, 2008 at 11:29 pm | Permalink

    This is why we need a primary. One voice one vote.

    They would’nt be so quick to screw with the election then.

    This kind of behavior needs to be reported to the DNC.

  70. American Way
    Posted February 9, 2008 at 11:31 pm | Permalink

    And J R, I am not Regular. Please refrain from the troll business. I was hoping it would go away with the new format/blog editors.

    Please go back and look at when I have posted, and what I have posted over time.

    You do know I am not regular? You are just trying to get my goat?

  71. American Way
    Posted February 9, 2008 at 11:37 pm | Permalink

    Political Momma, I am torn in my stand on the caucus/primary format.

    I liked the idea of individual speakers. The chance for individual citizens to speak. The chance for trying to move people from one corner of the room to the other.

    I also got tired of standing. Tired of waiting in line. Tired of the BS from the republican county chairperson in today’s event.

    But on the other hand – one million dollars to allow us ALL to go into a booth and vote, is a very SMALL price to me for democracy. Get in and get out. We spend millions/billions on other programs. One million seems a small price.

    But, having observed both: I think I witnessed more democracy in action with the caucus.

    Painfull. Time consuming. And tolerance of listening to others opinions.

    It would have been much quicker for my wife and I to drive to the polling place and get our voting done. But I would not have received any input or ideas, different from my own.

  72. lindainks55
    Posted February 9, 2008 at 11:38 pm | Permalink

    PMom, Of course, this year we would have all rather had a primary. Most years the expense and futility would make many of us complain if a primary were held. But, I very much appreciated the fact that new voters could register right there on the spot – I saw many young people (NO MATTER what AmWay wants us to believe) I know were registering for the very first time. Excited, motivated voters! Let’s keep them that way by not being negative, remembering how important this fall’s election is, including them as valuable people with valuable ideas; and then, let’s kick some butt this fall!

  73. Posted February 9, 2008 at 11:38 pm | Permalink

    “Capn America, I prefer to keep my personal life, well personal.”

    BULLSH*T, Regular-AmWay.

    You’re all the time crowing about how much money you make, what kind of expensive scotch you’re drinking, how much more successful you are than everybody else.

    I guess “my paid-off house and two paid-off cars” isn’t personal . . .

    Typical Regular post–first you attack, and when you get attacked in response, you go for the outraged pity.

  74. writerdog
    Posted February 9, 2008 at 11:42 pm | Permalink

    AW he only had one speaker, in fact the only one at the Caucus in Sedgwick County who had more then one was Ron Paul ( he had two). I do not recall exactly whom the speaker was for Huckabee. At least is was someone I am not familiar with, BUT Pastor Terry Fox was in the audience and that could mean that the R.R. was pulling for him or simply the logic that Fox is a conservative.

    On a personal note: As a person of faith I found this disturbing, Mc Cain is a Washington insider whom I know full well is a Neoconservative that wishes to continue the “Bush Doctrine. Ron Paul is a Libertarian whom wishes to roll back this country to a passed grace and it is hoped that we have grown as a species from then. But the only candidate whom campaign has reached out on a personal level and done what I would call “dirty Politics “ by smearing his rival behind the scenes and not in an open way that gives his opponent a chance to respond. Is the one whom is portrayed as the upright, Christian and honest candidate Mike Huckabee. His claim that he has no control over the “push poll calls” sound somewhat like the armed Robber whom after killing the store clerk claims it was not him. It was the gun that killed the clerk. The robber’s hand just happen to be on it at the time! It is an effrontery to my faith, my religion and my denomination.

  75. Political_mama
    Posted February 9, 2008 at 11:47 pm | Permalink

    That’s what you get for your side Writer, and like a good little boy, you keep putting up with it.

  76. American Way
    Posted February 9, 2008 at 11:50 pm | Permalink

    “AW he only had one speaker,”

    Thanks WriterDog. So my observations were local, and not a political tactic by huckleberry. It appears to me nine of the ten speakers for Huck were set up. I must be wrong.

    My wife voted for Ron Paul too, for what it’s worth. She felt she was making a statement – despite what we felt would be a McCain media driven win.

  77. writerdog
    Posted February 10, 2008 at 12:08 am | Permalink

    MOM I do not exactly put up with it, at times yes I feel somewhat alone but I know I am not. Its just being handled in different ways, the rest of the Moderates, Liberals as now we are called. Can be either just not voting, be a swing voter or in some cases change party.
    LOL I have to admit though life did seem easier when I was surrounded by OKie Democrats. Though I did disagree with them on the abortion issue, I tend to be grudgingly Pro-Choice. While they did seem more pro-life, but then I was a Elephant in a pack of Donkeys! Some moderates are finding their voices and speaking out I just seem more vocal about it. Some of what you may call the extreme right are not happy about it too. But this partisanship is often forcing them into a corner and they end up defending rather then explaining.

  78. American Way
    Posted February 10, 2008 at 12:25 am | Permalink

    “expensive scotch you’re drinking”

    You know nothing Capn American about me. Why do you insist on wasting space attacking other posters and speaking negatively about them? What does that say for your character?

    Appleton is a rum.

    I don’t recall EVER “crowing” about the money I make. I DO recall complaining about you wanting me to give what I do make to your social programs.
    (anyone who wants the truth can check American Way posts).

    Why do you have to attack posters who disagree with you? Does that give you some sense of satisfaction? Does it stroke your ego?

    I would like to post my opinions. I would like to read other opinions on my posts and those opinions of others.

    I need not make it personal. Or attack.

    Having first posted last spring, I am well aware of some poster here who spend their time posting and attacking other posters. It is very tempting to for some to do so and so respond.

  79. J R
    Posted February 10, 2008 at 12:28 am | Permalink

    I respect you writerdog.

    But I cannot understand you.

    How is it that you as a working person votes with the party of your boss? And you don’t just vote for it. You embrace your own servitude. Why?

    A democratic President would bring a union to your work place. You would not have to beg for fair treatment or wages. They would be your right.

    I respect very much your Libertarian ideals. But you must ask yourself, is success or economic liberty DEPENDANT on reporting to a boss? And if it is, does it make any difference if that boss is a state functionary or a corporate drone mid manager?

    I weigh with the state. There, I get a vote.

    I can vote out the boss.

    But on your line of thinking, I’ve no choice but to do as the private boss says I must. Well that or starve.

    Freedom must be to ALL or it is to none writerdog. I don’t know why it is you do not understand that.

  80. WhiteElephant
    Posted February 10, 2008 at 12:39 am | Permalink

    I’m leaning toward Obama, or Hilary, I’m not sure which, I do know we need a democrat to balance out the far right wing politics America has endured the past 7 years, I just hope which ever Democrat wins, doesn’t do something as extreme as this administration, and pull completely out of Iraq, that would undermine all the lives our soldiers have given, to leave Iraq in a disillusioned and weak state prone to be taken over by another dictator or an Islamist fascist. Iraq will eventually stabilize if we stay there, and will be a bug zapper for terrorist and religious extremists. Terrorism will eventually fail, people evolve out of extremism, and the neo-conservatives were a sort of soft extremism at worst, but with some of their radical views, I do believe they set in motion a sort of bitter strategy that will work itself out, I just hate the fact of their propaganda tactics to spread fear, while lying, so there is some good that comes with the bad and vice versa, hopefully the democrats can restore habeas corpus, and repeal at least part of the patriot act to restore our right to privacy, while sadly staying the course in Iraq is for the best.

  81. American Way
    Posted February 10, 2008 at 12:41 am | Permalink

    “And if it is, does it make any difference if that boss is a state functionary or a corporate drone mid managerI weigh with the state. There, I get a vote.”

    The above views are those of Karl Marx, Lenin, and the now defunct Communist Party.
    .
    .
    .
    .
    Saddly, they are now the beliefs of the American Democratic Party.

  82. J R
    Posted February 10, 2008 at 12:44 am | Permalink

    “American way” is “JM” aka many nics.

    This is a person who does not work for a living.

    This is a person on the government dole opining on people who do have to work for a living.

  83. American Way
    Posted February 10, 2008 at 12:47 am | Permalink

    WEBLOG EDITORS: Please set J R on the straight and narrow.

    Why he chooses to attack another poster, and make personal attacks – I have not a clue.

    Send him a personal email (I know he emails you) and let him know I am not whom he claims I am.
    Please tell him to limit his posts to opinions/counter opinions on the issues.

    Wichita Eagle & Beacon Publishing Co: Please stop this nonsense.

  84. J R
    Posted February 10, 2008 at 12:51 am | Permalink

    email it in your next whine to the editors James.

    I’ve almost never written the editors.

    The night is yours. I don’t wish you a good one.

  85. American Way
    Posted February 10, 2008 at 12:58 am | Permalink

    That’s nice J R. I now have email on you.

    Hopefully, your 13 year old son is home tonight, and you are going to get a job with good wages to be able to afford health insurance for him.

    Our children’s welfare should be of paramount concern for all of us. It was for me and I am thankful I could provide for them, until they married and became independent and contributing citizens.

  86. MonkeyHawk
    Posted February 10, 2008 at 1:16 am | Permalink

    “WhiteElephant” writes –

    “…something as extreme as…pull completely out of Iraq, that would undermine all the lives our soldiers have given, to leave Iraq in a disillusioned and weak state prone to be taken over by another dictator or an Islamist fascist. Iraq will eventually stabilize if we stay there, and will be a bug zapper for terrorist and religious extremists….”

    Iraq is destined for a bloodbath. It’s an artificial country, a bunch of tribal factions forced upon each other by the Brits after World War I.

    They never got along together before the Ottoman Empire imposed a dictatorship on them. They barely got along together when the Ba’athist Party imposed a dictatorship on them. The Shi’ites and Sunis and Kurds are eventually gonna draw new borders and create sustaining governments. And not a thousand more or a million more or one more American death is gonna change what happens in that particular part of the world.
    phant

    Pulling out of Iraq would most certainly not “…undermine all the lives our soldiers have given.”

    That was Nixon’s rationale in the ‘Nam that led to over half of America’s war dead in that war occurring after Nixon was elected in 1968 on the basis of his “secret plan to end the war.”

    50,000 Americans died in Vietnam. More than half of them died after Richard Nixon became Commander in Chief. He justified their deaths because he didn’t want to “undermine the lives our soldiers have given.”

    Read “The Charge of the Light Brigade” again and remind yourself how foolish commanders send brave and worthy young people into harm’s way for worthless goals. That’s what George WMD Bush did you America’s young people in Iraq. There is no honor in sending more. There is only honor in recognizing the horrific mistake and ending it.

    The Sunis and the Shi’ites and the Kurds perhaps are not as “civilized” as we are. They may end the strife in Iraq with continued civil war and horrific acts of cruelty and vengeance.

    Nothing American soldiers can do will prevent that, though. And no one will be dishonored by recognizing that.

  87. writerdog
    Posted February 10, 2008 at 1:26 am | Permalink

    In a real sense JR we all work for someone, whether it be for a company, yourself or your family. If you do not like working for a “boss” you start your own business, but then you are really working for those that use your business either a customer or your employees.
    Someone is depending on you to do something that at any moment you would not rather do. In a sense the company works for me, I require payment for my serves else they do not get them. I require they provide me with the proper equipment else I do not do my job for them. I required them to provide health insurance else I am not going to be healthy enough to do my work. I work for my wife as she depends on me to provide assistance with the house payment, putting food on the table and clothing.

    I understand where you are coming from, here is where I am. That company in order for them to work for me needs to survive and prosper. Else they fail and can not give me what I want. If I do not want to own the company they need to own it for me.
    This is something often over looked in a Capitalist society, if you want to be a business you have to have employees and by your paying them they are now a customer of your business. If not directly then through the expansion of their money throughout the economy. True the Boeing employee is not buying a 767 but his wages go to a business and that business either flies on that 767 that Boeing makes or passed along the money to some one down the road who does.

    When an employer either cuts the buying power of the employee or lays them off. He is cutting into his own income or profit. Since that employee’s salary is where the employer’s money is coming from. That is the problem with the thought process of shipping jobs over seas and downsizing here. They are actually cutting into their profits while doing it. In the end it will be that company that suffers for the lost of jobs.

    What I support is not the company as much as my own best interests. I use to be a real wind mill tilter in my younger days till I finally figured out that the only thing I was receiving was a bloody forehead for my attacking those windmills. I still do to an extent as often my opinion is quite clear.

  88. Regular
    Posted February 10, 2008 at 2:30 am | Permalink

    I see J R and CapnAmerica are still eating their own feces and liking it.

    So I’m American Way tonight eh?

    Who will it be tomorrow?

  89. MonkeyHawk
    Posted February 10, 2008 at 3:02 am | Permalink

    None of it really matters, “Regular” –

    I’m pretty confident you post under a number of sockpuppet nics. But do I care?

    Nah. There may very well be others as stupid and ignorant as you. Perhaps they’re just trying to achieve your level of idiocy and simply sound like you.

  90. Regular
    Posted February 10, 2008 at 3:53 am | Permalink

    You would be absolutely wrong MonkeyHawk.

    It’s not a wonder you can’t predict anything, simply because you don’t accept posters who just post under their own name and their own name only.

    The amount of troll posters on this new blog have been those with Leftist Lib views. They far exceed any “trolls” on the right. Yet, the leftist libs are the loudest whiners about troll posters.

    Why Brownlee doesn’t create a sign in is beyond me. It’s not like it is a complicated thing to do.

  91. ksci
    Posted February 10, 2008 at 4:05 am | Permalink

    Huckabee winning told be that the religious right is behind him, not McCain. I think they are afraid that McCain won’t appoint judges to the Supreme Court that will over turn R v W.

  92. RS
    Posted February 10, 2008 at 5:45 am | Permalink

    Huckabee got a huge push by solidifying his stance on Illegal immigration.

    Too bad he waited till the show is almost over before doing it. He would have been WAAAAAAAAY ahead of McCain if he had.

  93. Phantom
    Posted February 10, 2008 at 5:51 am | Permalink

    It’s hard to undermine a life that has already been foolishly forfeited.

5 Trackbacks

  1. [...] See the rest here: Kansas Republicans go for the underdog [...]

  2. By healthy eating in schools on February 21, 2008 at 8:35 am

    healthy eating in schools…

    Nice Post… do you know what is the first? i`ve the new album at my blog http://sumpit.info…

  3. By National Health Insurance Company Texas on February 23, 2008 at 10:49 am

    National Health Insurance Company Texas…

    Do you think many people may consider it?…

  4. By Friend of the Rugs on February 25, 2008 at 5:06 am

    Friend of the Rugs…

  5. By amy jo johnson clips on March 2, 2008 at 3:21 am

    amy jo johnson clips…

    Thanks for the nice read, keep up the interesting posts…..