<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sebelius speech too soft for some</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/01/sebelius-speech-too-soft-for-some/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/01/sebelius-speech-too-soft-for-some/</link>
	<description>The Wichita Eagle Editorial Department Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 22:17:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: CC Jesup</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/01/sebelius-speech-too-soft-for-some/#comment-307238</link>
		<dc:creator>CC Jesup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 14:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/01/sebelius-speech-too-soft-for-some/#comment-307238</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;CC Jesup...&lt;/strong&gt;

thanks thats a great post maybe a little confused....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>CC Jesup&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>thanks thats a great post maybe a little confused&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ass Thick Ass Babes Kick Ass</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/01/sebelius-speech-too-soft-for-some/#comment-298729</link>
		<dc:creator>Ass Thick Ass Babes Kick Ass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 18:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/01/sebelius-speech-too-soft-for-some/#comment-298729</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Ass Thick Ass Babes Kick Ass...&lt;/strong&gt;

I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Ass Thick Ass Babes Kick Ass&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pee Female Pee Pee Hole</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/01/sebelius-speech-too-soft-for-some/#comment-297561</link>
		<dc:creator>Pee Female Pee Pee Hole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 04:52:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/01/sebelius-speech-too-soft-for-some/#comment-297561</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Pee Female Pee Pee Hole...&lt;/strong&gt;

I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Pee Female Pee Pee Hole&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/01/sebelius-speech-too-soft-for-some/#comment-293266</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/01/sebelius-speech-too-soft-for-some/#comment-293266</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Eric...&lt;/strong&gt;

Man i love reading your blog, interesting posts !...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Eric&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Man i love reading your blog, interesting posts !&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Back Fulfillment And</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/01/sebelius-speech-too-soft-for-some/#comment-291173</link>
		<dc:creator>Back Fulfillment And</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 20:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/01/sebelius-speech-too-soft-for-some/#comment-291173</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;How to have a fulfilling, abundant life filled with joy, peace, happiness, and good health......&lt;/strong&gt;

How to be in harmony with the The Universal Laws? ... How to understand them and use them to our advantage?...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>How to have a fulfilling, abundant life filled with joy, peace, happiness, and good health&#8230;&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>How to be in harmony with the The Universal Laws? &#8230; How to understand them and use them to our advantage?&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/01/sebelius-speech-too-soft-for-some/#comment-290349</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 07:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/01/sebelius-speech-too-soft-for-some/#comment-290349</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Jack...&lt;/strong&gt;

I love this web stuff!...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Jack&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I love this web stuff!&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anus</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/01/sebelius-speech-too-soft-for-some/#comment-289325</link>
		<dc:creator>anus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 22:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/01/sebelius-speech-too-soft-for-some/#comment-289325</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;anus...&lt;/strong&gt;

cool site !!!...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>anus&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>cool site !!!&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TDT</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/01/sebelius-speech-too-soft-for-some/#comment-285044</link>
		<dc:creator>TDT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/01/sebelius-speech-too-soft-for-some/#comment-285044</guid>
		<description>KFG, I was not trolled. I voted for Clinton both times, however, my point is that he was not able to keep the Republicans at bay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KFG, I was not trolled. I voted for Clinton both times, however, my point is that he was not able to keep the Republicans at bay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SolDevVB</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/01/sebelius-speech-too-soft-for-some/#comment-284984</link>
		<dc:creator>SolDevVB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 13:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/01/sebelius-speech-too-soft-for-some/#comment-284984</guid>
		<description>throw - wtf man, I need to wake up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>throw - wtf man, I need to wake up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SolDevVB</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/01/sebelius-speech-too-soft-for-some/#comment-284983</link>
		<dc:creator>SolDevVB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 13:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/01/sebelius-speech-too-soft-for-some/#comment-284983</guid>
		<description>Farmie, 

I think Obama will face Bill’s fate. He will approach the –right- with open arms and bipartisanship and the –right- will spit in his face and through up every road block imaginable. 

Hillary may go in with bared teeth, but she will face the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Farmie, </p>
<p>I think Obama will face Bill’s fate. He will approach the –right- with open arms and bipartisanship and the –right- will spit in his face and through up every road block imaginable. </p>
<p>Hillary may go in with bared teeth, but she will face the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kev</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/01/sebelius-speech-too-soft-for-some/#comment-284979</link>
		<dc:creator>Kev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 13:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/01/sebelius-speech-too-soft-for-some/#comment-284979</guid>
		<description>The speech was fine for the occassion. Although I am a "political warrior", the nation is not in the mood right now for her to get up there and dump boiling water on Bush or give a hellfire speech. Save it for the campaign ahead!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The speech was fine for the occassion. Although I am a &#8220;political warrior&#8221;, the nation is not in the mood right now for her to get up there and dump boiling water on Bush or give a hellfire speech. Save it for the campaign ahead!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ksfarmgrrl</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/01/sebelius-speech-too-soft-for-some/#comment-284692</link>
		<dc:creator>ksfarmgrrl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 00:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/01/sebelius-speech-too-soft-for-some/#comment-284692</guid>
		<description>Still waiting for an answer, not a tirade about Hillary, TDT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still waiting for an answer, not a tirade about Hillary, TDT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ksfarmgrrl</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/01/sebelius-speech-too-soft-for-some/#comment-284550</link>
		<dc:creator>ksfarmgrrl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/01/sebelius-speech-too-soft-for-some/#comment-284550</guid>
		<description>These are not your words?

"He survived impeachment, but it wasted 3 years out of his damn presidency. And as I posted on the Kennedy thread, he supported NAFTA, which was G.H.W. Bush’s baby, and one of his first policies to implement was the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” which is bullshit. I voted for him twice, but the Clinton’s have had their chance and they could not keep the Republicans at bay, so Bill ended up pandering to them with compromise, the same thing that Hillary will do."

Were you trolled?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are not your words?</p>
<p>&#8220;He survived impeachment, but it wasted 3 years out of his damn presidency. And as I posted on the Kennedy thread, he supported NAFTA, which was G.H.W. Bush’s baby, and one of his first policies to implement was the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” which is bullshit. I voted for him twice, but the Clinton’s have had their chance and they could not keep the Republicans at bay, so Bill ended up pandering to them with compromise, the same thing that Hillary will do.&#8221;</p>
<p>Were you trolled?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ksfarmgrrl</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/01/sebelius-speech-too-soft-for-some/#comment-284548</link>
		<dc:creator>ksfarmgrrl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/01/sebelius-speech-too-soft-for-some/#comment-284548</guid>
		<description>?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TDT</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/01/sebelius-speech-too-soft-for-some/#comment-284546</link>
		<dc:creator>TDT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/01/sebelius-speech-too-soft-for-some/#comment-284546</guid>
		<description>Those weren't my words. Are you talking about King George, because I saw right through that, and could not believe that there were enough people stupid enough to vote for him so that he won the election, either time. I still don't quite believe it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those weren&#8217;t my words. Are you talking about King George, because I saw right through that, and could not believe that there were enough people stupid enough to vote for him so that he won the election, either time. I still don&#8217;t quite believe it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TDT</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/01/sebelius-speech-too-soft-for-some/#comment-284543</link>
		<dc:creator>TDT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/01/sebelius-speech-too-soft-for-some/#comment-284543</guid>
		<description>Yes KFG, I am assuming he will win in November. I really am.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes KFG, I am assuming he will win in November. I really am.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ksfarmgrrl</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/01/sebelius-speech-too-soft-for-some/#comment-284542</link>
		<dc:creator>ksfarmgrrl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/01/sebelius-speech-too-soft-for-some/#comment-284542</guid>
		<description>And I remember another candidate who ran and won on the "hope and inspiration" platform and was touted as the next JFK. Remember him?

And by your own words above... how did THAT work out?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I remember another candidate who ran and won on the &#8220;hope and inspiration&#8221; platform and was touted as the next JFK. Remember him?</p>
<p>And by your own words above&#8230; how did THAT work out?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TDT</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/01/sebelius-speech-too-soft-for-some/#comment-284539</link>
		<dc:creator>TDT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/01/sebelius-speech-too-soft-for-some/#comment-284539</guid>
		<description>I am posting for the hell of it so I can see the other comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am posting for the hell of it so I can see the other comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ksfarmgrrl</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/01/sebelius-speech-too-soft-for-some/#comment-284538</link>
		<dc:creator>ksfarmgrrl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/01/sebelius-speech-too-soft-for-some/#comment-284538</guid>
		<description>You are both assuming obama can win in November.  If he loses, will all that inspiration have been worth it?

And yeah, obama is the favorite son of ElDorado. Did you think there would NOT be a supportive crowd?

I bet he carries all six of kansas EC votes.... IF he puts governor leadership on the ticket.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are both assuming obama can win in November.  If he loses, will all that inspiration have been worth it?</p>
<p>And yeah, obama is the favorite son of ElDorado. Did you think there would NOT be a supportive crowd?</p>
<p>I bet he carries all six of kansas EC votes&#8230;. IF he puts governor leadership on the ticket.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TDT</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/01/sebelius-speech-too-soft-for-some/#comment-284531</link>
		<dc:creator>TDT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/01/sebelius-speech-too-soft-for-some/#comment-284531</guid>
		<description>He survived impeachment, but it wasted 3 years out of his damn presidency. And as I posted on the Kennedy thread, he supported NAFTA, which was G.H.W. Bush's baby, and one of his first policies to implement was the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" which is bullshit. I voted for him twice, but the Clinton's have had their chance and they could not keep the Republicans at bay, so Bill ended up pandering to them with compromise, the same thing that Hillary will do. I think that Obama will be able to INSPIRE, no need to pander. I also think there will definitely be compromise, but not that much since I believe we are going to keep a majority Congress as well as have the White House.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He survived impeachment, but it wasted 3 years out of his damn presidency. And as I posted on the Kennedy thread, he supported NAFTA, which was G.H.W. Bush&#8217;s baby, and one of his first policies to implement was the &#8220;Don&#8217;t Ask, Don&#8217;t Tell&#8221; which is bullshit. I voted for him twice, but the Clinton&#8217;s have had their chance and they could not keep the Republicans at bay, so Bill ended up pandering to them with compromise, the same thing that Hillary will do. I think that Obama will be able to INSPIRE, no need to pander. I also think there will definitely be compromise, but not that much since I believe we are going to keep a majority Congress as well as have the White House.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MonkeyHawk</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/01/sebelius-speech-too-soft-for-some/#comment-284530</link>
		<dc:creator>MonkeyHawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/01/sebelius-speech-too-soft-for-some/#comment-284530</guid>
		<description>"ksfarmgrrl"--

But all of the congressional dymnamics change with a Democrat in the White House.

There's no veto threat for the Democratic majority's will in Congress.

There could still be a fillibuster threat in the Senate, but not if the Democratic presidential candidate has unified support sufficient to create coat-tails.

I'm not sure that's possible, but there are so many Republic Party congresscritters who are getting out (with a tidy sum of campaign contributions) while the getting's good.  

Look back at all the issues the new (barely) Democratic Congresss tried to achieve over the last year... and look at what the threat or reality of Shrub's veto prevented.  A fillibuster-proof Senate may be an election cycyle or two away, but we're getting there.  

Frankly, after seeing the diverse crowd -- In *KANSAS!!* f'r cryin' out loud -- at the Obama thing in El Dorado, I've got a good feeling that Barrack's coalition is one of attraction rather than submission.

There was a piece on NPR this morning about Obama talking about his Kansas roots.  His grandmother's cousin was in the crowd (she corrected him when he said he thought she was a great-aunt or something... it was funny and cute and he took it well)... a 70-something white Kansas housewife who, I guarantee you, *NO ONE* would have picked out of the Butler County crowd as a relative of the candidate.

And it didn't make a whit of difference.  We all stood in line in the cold Kansas wind and white-out blizzard conditions... and the young and the old and the black and the brown and the white and the cold... (well, we all were cold)... came together in a special moment.

This isn't, as "J R" rails about, a matter of conceding to the Republic; it's a matter of being right and those guys are welcome to join us or be left behind.  It was also ('cause I saw some people there whom I know personally as traditional Republic Party advocates, and I saw them come to their feet with applause), an event where people came together as Kansans and Americans and didn't really notice color or creed or even traditional political party cant.

Chalk it up to campaign manipulation, or the candidate's charisma, or simply because inside the gym in El Dorado we weren't as miserable as when we were standing outside in a windswept prairie blizzard...  We were all in this together and it was something to behold.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;ksfarmgrrl&#8221;&#8211;</p>
<p>But all of the congressional dymnamics change with a Democrat in the White House.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s no veto threat for the Democratic majority&#8217;s will in Congress.</p>
<p>There could still be a fillibuster threat in the Senate, but not if the Democratic presidential candidate has unified support sufficient to create coat-tails.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure that&#8217;s possible, but there are so many Republic Party congresscritters who are getting out (with a tidy sum of campaign contributions) while the getting&#8217;s good.  </p>
<p>Look back at all the issues the new (barely) Democratic Congresss tried to achieve over the last year&#8230; and look at what the threat or reality of Shrub&#8217;s veto prevented.  A fillibuster-proof Senate may be an election cycyle or two away, but we&#8217;re getting there.  </p>
<p>Frankly, after seeing the diverse crowd &#8212; In *KANSAS!!* f&#8217;r cryin&#8217; out loud &#8212; at the Obama thing in El Dorado, I&#8217;ve got a good feeling that Barrack&#8217;s coalition is one of attraction rather than submission.</p>
<p>There was a piece on NPR this morning about Obama talking about his Kansas roots.  His grandmother&#8217;s cousin was in the crowd (she corrected him when he said he thought she was a great-aunt or something&#8230; it was funny and cute and he took it well)&#8230; a 70-something white Kansas housewife who, I guarantee you, *NO ONE* would have picked out of the Butler County crowd as a relative of the candidate.</p>
<p>And it didn&#8217;t make a whit of difference.  We all stood in line in the cold Kansas wind and white-out blizzard conditions&#8230; and the young and the old and the black and the brown and the white and the cold&#8230; (well, we all were cold)&#8230; came together in a special moment.</p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t, as &#8220;J R&#8221; rails about, a matter of conceding to the Republic; it&#8217;s a matter of being right and those guys are welcome to join us or be left behind.  It was also (&#8217;cause I saw some people there whom I know personally as traditional Republic Party advocates, and I saw them come to their feet with applause), an event where people came together as Kansans and Americans and didn&#8217;t really notice color or creed or even traditional political party cant.</p>
<p>Chalk it up to campaign manipulation, or the candidate&#8217;s charisma, or simply because inside the gym in El Dorado we weren&#8217;t as miserable as when we were standing outside in a windswept prairie blizzard&#8230;  We were all in this together and it was something to behold.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TDT</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/01/sebelius-speech-too-soft-for-some/#comment-284528</link>
		<dc:creator>TDT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/01/sebelius-speech-too-soft-for-some/#comment-284528</guid>
		<description>test</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>test</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ksfarmgrrl</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/01/sebelius-speech-too-soft-for-some/#comment-284520</link>
		<dc:creator>ksfarmgrrl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/01/sebelius-speech-too-soft-for-some/#comment-284520</guid>
		<description>I asked you first.

And who says Clinton did not keep them at bay? He survived impeachment didnt he?

Still waiting for your answer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I asked you first.</p>
<p>And who says Clinton did not keep them at bay? He survived impeachment didnt he?</p>
<p>Still waiting for your answer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TDT</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/01/sebelius-speech-too-soft-for-some/#comment-284512</link>
		<dc:creator>TDT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 19:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/01/sebelius-speech-too-soft-for-some/#comment-284512</guid>
		<description>KFG - In the Kennedy thread you asked how Obama was going to keep the Republican's at bay. I did not answer, but posed the same question of Clinton. Since her husband was unable to do so, what makes you think that Hillary will be able to?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KFG - In the Kennedy thread you asked how Obama was going to keep the Republican&#8217;s at bay. I did not answer, but posed the same question of Clinton. Since her husband was unable to do so, what makes you think that Hillary will be able to?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ksfarmgrrl</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/01/sebelius-speech-too-soft-for-some/#comment-284510</link>
		<dc:creator>ksfarmgrrl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 19:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/01/sebelius-speech-too-soft-for-some/#comment-284510</guid>
		<description>Go ahead. Nominate someone who will LOSE in November. 

THAT'll put on back on the road to the real America...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go ahead. Nominate someone who will LOSE in November. </p>
<p>THAT&#8217;ll put on back on the road to the real America&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
