Sebelius speech too soft for some

sebeliusGov. Kathleen Sebelius did a fine job in delivering the Democratic response to the State of the Union address, in our view. But she got some bad reviews in the political blogosphere, especially peeving liberals looking to kick President Bush when he was down and on his way out the door.

The 23/6 blog, which is affiliated with the Huffington Post news hub, called her response lackluster and worse: “Bush’s parting speech was a perfect chance for the Democrats to hit back and provide a harsh but necessary criticism of the past seven years. Instead, they sent out Stepford Governor Kathleen Sebelius of Kansas, who in the spirit of bipartisanship urged the president to ‘join us’ and ‘get to work.’ Unfortunately, by then the president was already in his jammies and sound asleep.”

40 Comments

  1. Political_mama
    Posted January 30, 2008 at 6:26 am | Permalink

    Even Jon Stewart hit her last night too. After that, I had to say, Sigh, it must have been true.

    I do agree that a nice approach is not going to work with the neocons. I am done with nice.

  2. The Phantom
    Posted January 30, 2008 at 7:01 am | Permalink

    The damage done by bush and his party (party being the operative word) is so great and broad it’s going to take a unified country to clean up after!

  3. MonkeyHawk
    Posted January 30, 2008 at 8:01 am | Permalink

    Jon Stewart (once again) said it best: “Flat and boring? What state does she represent again?”

    As a former sometime media consultant, I wish I could have coached the Governor before her speech. Television is an intimate medium when it’s one-on-one, and she seemed to modulate her style without realizing that she wasn’t “speaking to the nation,” she was *sitting in people’s living rooms.*

    Sebelius is an effective public speaker. She feeds off the crowd (as was evident at the Obama rally in El Dorado yesterday), but there’s a belief among media types that a woman has to tone down, look “official,” and act like a man on personal television appearances.

    Sebelius’ words Monday night were good (not great, but good), but there was a feeling that she was a little girl forced to recite her speech in front of a family reunion. As with so many performances, she came up short because she was more worried about failing than out to succeed.

    It was kind of the flip-side of Barrack Obama’s speech in El Dorado yesterday. It quite clearly was *not* his standard stump speech, and he had problems with the teleprompter.

    One of those magic moments the media never tells you, and the reason to be there in person when Kathleen shared with the crowd her sons’ support for Obama. The oldest (in law school) joined the Obama campaign due to policy issues. Her younger son (and, no, she didn’t mention his class project prison board game) said, “Anyone who can convince Michelle to marry him gets my vote!”

    And here’s that live and in-person moment no one in the media reports: When Sebelius mentioned Michelle Obama, Barrack did a tiny little fist pump that made you believe that, yes! *THAT* was the best thing he’s ever gonna do in his life: win Michelle.

    Politics ain’t beanbag, and there are all sorts of controversies and piddly “issues” and big ideas and dirty tricks and spins we put our presidential candidates into. So far, Barrack seems up to all the challenges we put our candidates up to. But with that little fist pump, revealed he’s confortable in his own skin. And when he muffed up an introduction and confused a second-cousin (a 70-ish white woman) with his Mother’s aunt… and she corrected him… there was a true feeling that the color of Obama’s skin absolutely meant nothing.

    More than 3,000 people stood outside the Butler College gym for as long as 3 hours in the middle of a bitter-cold, biting wind-driven blizzard, to discover that the crowd was black and white and brown and young and old and Republican and Democratic and (I assume) gay and straight and liberal and moderate and (I knew some of the people personally who are) conservative.

    It felt like America in that building in El Dorado yesterday. And it felt pretty good.

  4. george
    Posted January 30, 2008 at 8:35 am | Permalink

    I had commented earlier on her dull performance. The fire had more spark than she did. She did much better Tuesday in ElDorado. Go MItt.

  5. MonkeyHawk
    Posted January 30, 2008 at 10:05 am | Permalink

    Jon Stewart said it best: “Flat and boring? What state does she represent again?”

    As a former sometime media consultant, I wish I could have coached the Governor before her speech. Television is an intimate medium when it’s one-on-one, and she seemed to modulate her style without realizing that she wasn’t “speaking to the nation,” she was *sitting in people’s living rooms.*

    Sebelius is an effective public speaker. She feeds off the crowd (as was evident at the Obama rally in El Dorado yesterday), but there’s a belief among media types that a woman has to tone down, look “official,” and act like a man on personal television appearances.

    Sebelius’ words Monday night were good (not great, but good), but there was a feeling that she was a little girl forced to recite her speech in front of a family reunion. As with so many performances, she came up short because she was more worried about failing than out to succeed.

    It was kind of the flip-side of Barrack Obama’s speech in El Dorado yesterday. It quite clearly was *not* his standard stump speech, and he had problems with the teleprompter.

    One of those magic moments the media never tells you, and the reason to be there in person when Kathleen shared with the crowd her sons’ support for Obama. The oldest (in law school) joined the Obama campaign due to policy issues. Her younger son (and, no, she didn’t mention his class project prison board game) said, “Anyone who can convince Michelle to marry him gets my vote!”

    And here’s that live and in-person moment no one in the media reports: When Sebelius mentioned Michelle Obama, Barrack did a tiny little fist pump that made you believe that, yes! *THAT* was the best thing he’s ever gonna do in his life: win Michelle.

    Politics ain’t beanbag, and there are all sorts of controversies and piddly “issues” and big ideas and dirty tricks and spins we put our presidential candidates into. So far, Barrack seems up to all the challenges we put our candidates up to. But with that little fist pump, revealed he’s confortable in his own skin. And when he muffed up an introduction and confused a second-cousin (a 70-ish white woman) with his Mother’s aunt… and she corrected him… there was a true feeling that the color of Obama’s skin absolutely meant nothing.

    More than 3,000 people stood outside the Butler College gym for as long as 3 hours in the middle of a bitter-cold, biting wind-driven blizzard, to discover that the crowd was black and white and brown and young and old and Republican and Democratic and (I assume) gay and straight and liberal and moderate and (I knew some of the people personally who are) conservative.

    It felt like America in that building in El Dorado yesterday. And it felt pretty good.

  6. ksfarmgrrl
    Posted January 30, 2008 at 10:29 am | Permalink

    Jon Stewart did an over the top roast of governor “leadership” last night. Catch it today on the re-runs if you can. I laughed until my sides hurt. He hit it DEAD on.

    What the hell was up with her that night? No matter how much I think she sucks as a governor, I agree, she is usually a very good performer, and I might add, a very good looking woman. But in her SOTO response, she looked like hell and sounded even worse.

    And it wasnt even her wishy washy words. I mean, we expect that from her, and it’s why we call her governor “leadership”. She sounded like she didnt even believe what she was saying.

    I guess she was just too excited about announcing the eight wonders of Kansas to really focus on her national speech. heheheheh

    Sebelius bots in this state are always behaving like legends in their own minds. It is hard for them to believe that the rest of the country really doesnt know her, or know much about her, other than she is a blue party governor in a red state.

    Gee. Do ya think that’s because she hasnt really done much? Or shown much “leadership”?

    For most of the country, this was their first chance to hear her speak, up close and personal, so to speak.

    She blew it. Probably more people watched Jon Stewart last night than watched her give her “response”.

    And that is how she will be remembered. Obama would be a fool to put her on the ticket.

    let’s hope…

  7. ksfarmgrrl
    Posted January 30, 2008 at 10:34 am | Permalink

    Good god monkeyhawk, now that Edwards is leaving the race, are you jumping on the Obama bandwagon?

    Say it isnt so…

    Kansans. So desperate for attention that if a candidate just pays a visit and spouts a little rah rah rhetoric, we fall all over ourselves?

    From the comments of those who attended yesterday, that’s what it sounded like to me. Sounded like Kansans were practicing their Sally Fields moment. To paraphrase, “he likes us. He really likes us!”

    With all due respect MonkeyHawk, I hope you reconsider your support of Obama, if that is how you are leaning.

  8. Steven Davis
    Posted January 30, 2008 at 11:22 am | Permalink

    Check out yesterday’s Crowson cartoon. Says it all about Kansas and Obama.

    Didn’t get in to see Obama, but got to see the Phelps’ up close and personal. See the email with a subject line of “El Dorado road trip adventure”.

  9. Posted January 30, 2008 at 11:27 am | Permalink

    Steven–

    Obama was shaking hands with people for a half hour after the event.

    You should have stuck around . . .

  10. J R
    Posted January 30, 2008 at 11:27 am | Permalink

    Yesterday, CNN was calling Kathy “a rising star” in the Democratic party.

    Well that “star” must be rising at the hind end of the universe.

    She was pandery and pitiful.

  11. Posted January 30, 2008 at 11:31 am | Permalink

    Good post, MonkeyHawk.

    I was in the crowd Tuesday, and that’s the feeling I got too.

    It was a box of crayolas in that crowd, but we were all on the same side, we were all Americans and part of the same family.

    It was a great feeling.

    ML King had a dream. Barack Obama is the fulfillment of that dream.

  12. ksfarmgrrl
    Posted January 30, 2008 at 11:51 am | Permalink

    So… I guess you guys will all be feeling good all the way to defeat in November?

    I think the republicans will be glad to let you have your feelings while they continue to loot the treasury and laugh all the way to their offshore banks.

  13. J R
    Posted January 30, 2008 at 11:54 am | Permalink

    Ya know what Kathy’s little stepford moment reminded me of?

    Someone on a telethon.

    Not that there is anything wrong with that in its place. But she was SUPPOSED to be responding to bush’s crap. Instead she just helped him shovel it.

  14. ksfarmgrrl
    Posted January 30, 2008 at 12:15 pm | Permalink

    She musta been REALLY nervous. She should have cut back on the Xanax at least a few hours before the speech.

    hehehehehhehe.

    Governor Xanax. Now THERE’s a slogan…

  15. MonkeyHawk
    Posted January 30, 2008 at 12:27 pm | Permalink

    As I pointed out, “ksfarmgrrl,” –

    Maybe ya had to be there.

    But the power of the room in El Dorado came from the audience even more than from the podium.

    There may be a bit of feeling that, instead of a leader, Barrack Obama is that kind of politician savvy enough to sense where the crowd is going and speedy enough to get up front. I dunno.

    It seemed like something more powerful that “J R’s” contention that Obama is a sell-out. More that the people in the room feel that we don’t have to fight as dirty as the Republic Party, we simply and obviously outnumber them.

    And I realize — ’cause I’m not usually this way — how potentially naively idealistic this might sound to those of you on the Cynic Route, but today, on the cusp of January/February 2008, there really seems like a lot of people who’ve become encouraged in the prospect we can become America again.

    George WMD Bush’s world is not what America’s about. And John McCain’s world might be what America could have been back before Reagan screwed up the 1980s. Mittens Romney is whatever the polls tell him he should be (not unlike Bill Clinton), and Hillary is fighting past wars (sort of a political Maginot Line).

    I still admire and respect John Edwards. And I believe in any other year, either against the first vialble female candidate or against the first vialble African-American candidate, Edwards would have enjoyed more success at the polls. But the glitz got in the way. We know a white male will be the Republic Party’s nominee and look where voting for white males has gotten us. As Dr. Phil says, “How’s that workin’ out?”

    As I’ve said many times in this forum, I like and respect Senator Clinton, but I think her skill-set best serves America as a strong United States Senator. I think (as with Mondale and Dukakis and Gore and Kerry) she would be far superior to any Republic Party candidate once in office; but I doubt that she’s the best candidate during the election process.

    There’s never been a real grassroots-to-the-top presidential candidacy in my lifetime; but that’s what most people I know always seem to crave. I think we may have that this year in Barrack Obama’s run for the presidency.

    This isn’t a lesser of two evils thing with me. It’s accepting the best three very-goods. If it’s not John Edwards’ year, fine. I’ve accepted defeat before. If it means a unifiend Republic Party against Senator Clinton, simply because of the name “Clinton,” okay. I’m sick and tired of the way politics has operated for the past two presidencies.

    And the people in the room — including Barrack Obama — in El Dorado yesterday made it feel like America again. Like we’re all in this together again. And that we can be what it is America is supposed to be again.

    It was pretty heady stuff.

    And it felt pretty good.

  16. MonkeyHawk
    Posted January 30, 2008 at 12:41 pm | Permalink

    “ksfarmgrrl” –

    I get why you’re not a Sebelius-backer. And I understand it and your objections are not entirely without merit.

    But I’d urge you to not let good be the mortal enemy of perfect.

    As a practical politician, Kathleen has navigated an overwhelmingly Republic Party state with a certain amount of perception and pragmatic skill. No, she never says ex-act-ly-pre-cise-ly what I *wish* she’d said. But, like a sailboat race, she tacks through the waters and the winds pretty good toward the ultimate goal.

    Your objection to the Holcomb plant was, as I recall, based on water issues. So Sebelius got your way via the air-quality issue. Just why do you insist on objecting to success of your goal?

    If I had my way, I’d prefer Kathleen Sebelius went all Tawnya Harding on Phred Felps’ knees. But since she hasn’t, is her approach to gender rights really objectionable?

    I think this is gonna be an important presidential election year. And I think it’s gonna make a lot of Americans step back and look at the course the Republic Party and George WMD Bush has put us on. As with any ship, the Ship of State is gonna take a while to turn around.

    But we really, really need someone at the helm with a good idea of where we’re headed.

  17. ksfarmgrrl
    Posted January 30, 2008 at 1:40 pm | Permalink

    Monkey Hawk, I called it early on that Sebelius would NOT cross Hays and Sunflower Electric. I said that she would try to have it both ways. How?

    She got Bremby to deny the permit, and she will be behind the compromise that gets the plant built. See the front page of this website if you dont believe me.

    She’s so freakin’ predictable…

    And if the plants get built? WTF has she really DONE in this state? Other than lower taxes for businesses, take money away from the counties, rob the highway fund to balance the budget…

    Of course she is better than any of the repukes who ran against her. But she’s totally worked a republican agenda. And been very successful at it.

    She’s a master at having it both ways and smelling like a rose at the end of it.

    Triangulation. It’s not just for breakfast anymore…

  18. ksfarmgrrl
    Posted January 30, 2008 at 1:42 pm | Permalink

    Here’s the link Monkey. It’s got governor compromise’s fingerprints all over it.

    http://www.hdnews.net/Story/sebeliuspre013008

    It’ll pass. Trust me.

  19. ksfarmgrrl
    Posted January 30, 2008 at 1:43 pm | Permalink

    …and if the dems nominate obama, that’s what they’ll get too. President compromise. A la pelsosi and reid.

    How’s THAT worked out for stopping the wingnuts?

  20. TDT
    Posted January 30, 2008 at 1:47 pm | Permalink

    MonkeyHawk
    Posted January 30, 2008 at 12:27 pm | Permalink

    And I realize — ’cause I’m not usually this way — how potentially naively idealistic this might sound to those of you on the Cynic Route, but today, on the cusp of January/February 2008, there really seems like a lot of people who’ve become encouraged in the prospect we can become America again.

    My sentiments exactly MH. It’s an odd feeling after the last 16 years, isn’t it. But it sure feels good.

  21. ksfarmgrrl
    Posted January 30, 2008 at 1:53 pm | Permalink

    Dammit! You guys sound like a buncha teenagers contemplating sex at an early age.

    Yeah, the consequenses will last a lifetime, but it sure feels good in the moment…

    :)

  22. ksfarmgrrl
    Posted January 30, 2008 at 1:54 pm | Permalink

    …and you think we CANT be America again with Hillary at the top of the ticket?

    I think ANYONE but a republican could put us back on the road to being the American we were all taught to love.

  23. ksfarmgrrl
    Posted January 30, 2008 at 1:55 pm | Permalink

    Go ahead. Nominate someone who will LOSE in November.

    THAT’ll put on back on the road to the real America…

  24. TDT
    Posted January 30, 2008 at 1:57 pm | Permalink

    KFG - In the Kennedy thread you asked how Obama was going to keep the Republican’s at bay. I did not answer, but posed the same question of Clinton. Since her husband was unable to do so, what makes you think that Hillary will be able to?

  25. ksfarmgrrl
    Posted January 30, 2008 at 2:04 pm | Permalink

    I asked you first.

    And who says Clinton did not keep them at bay? He survived impeachment didnt he?

    Still waiting for your answer.

  26. TDT
    Posted January 30, 2008 at 2:15 pm | Permalink

    test

  27. MonkeyHawk
    Posted January 30, 2008 at 2:17 pm | Permalink

    “ksfarmgrrl”–

    But all of the congressional dymnamics change with a Democrat in the White House.

    There’s no veto threat for the Democratic majority’s will in Congress.

    There could still be a fillibuster threat in the Senate, but not if the Democratic presidential candidate has unified support sufficient to create coat-tails.

    I’m not sure that’s possible, but there are so many Republic Party congresscritters who are getting out (with a tidy sum of campaign contributions) while the getting’s good.

    Look back at all the issues the new (barely) Democratic Congresss tried to achieve over the last year… and look at what the threat or reality of Shrub’s veto prevented. A fillibuster-proof Senate may be an election cycyle or two away, but we’re getting there.

    Frankly, after seeing the diverse crowd — In *KANSAS!!* f’r cryin’ out loud — at the Obama thing in El Dorado, I’ve got a good feeling that Barrack’s coalition is one of attraction rather than submission.

    There was a piece on NPR this morning about Obama talking about his Kansas roots. His grandmother’s cousin was in the crowd (she corrected him when he said he thought she was a great-aunt or something… it was funny and cute and he took it well)… a 70-something white Kansas housewife who, I guarantee you, *NO ONE* would have picked out of the Butler County crowd as a relative of the candidate.

    And it didn’t make a whit of difference. We all stood in line in the cold Kansas wind and white-out blizzard conditions… and the young and the old and the black and the brown and the white and the cold… (well, we all were cold)… came together in a special moment.

    This isn’t, as “J R” rails about, a matter of conceding to the Republic; it’s a matter of being right and those guys are welcome to join us or be left behind. It was also (’cause I saw some people there whom I know personally as traditional Republic Party advocates, and I saw them come to their feet with applause), an event where people came together as Kansans and Americans and didn’t really notice color or creed or even traditional political party cant.

    Chalk it up to campaign manipulation, or the candidate’s charisma, or simply because inside the gym in El Dorado we weren’t as miserable as when we were standing outside in a windswept prairie blizzard… We were all in this together and it was something to behold.

  28. TDT
    Posted January 30, 2008 at 2:18 pm | Permalink

    He survived impeachment, but it wasted 3 years out of his damn presidency. And as I posted on the Kennedy thread, he supported NAFTA, which was G.H.W. Bush’s baby, and one of his first policies to implement was the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” which is bullshit. I voted for him twice, but the Clinton’s have had their chance and they could not keep the Republicans at bay, so Bill ended up pandering to them with compromise, the same thing that Hillary will do. I think that Obama will be able to INSPIRE, no need to pander. I also think there will definitely be compromise, but not that much since I believe we are going to keep a majority Congress as well as have the White House.

  29. ksfarmgrrl
    Posted January 30, 2008 at 2:24 pm | Permalink

    You are both assuming obama can win in November. If he loses, will all that inspiration have been worth it?

    And yeah, obama is the favorite son of ElDorado. Did you think there would NOT be a supportive crowd?

    I bet he carries all six of kansas EC votes…. IF he puts governor leadership on the ticket.

  30. TDT
    Posted January 30, 2008 at 2:24 pm | Permalink

    I am posting for the hell of it so I can see the other comments.

  31. ksfarmgrrl
    Posted January 30, 2008 at 2:25 pm | Permalink

    And I remember another candidate who ran and won on the “hope and inspiration” platform and was touted as the next JFK. Remember him?

    And by your own words above… how did THAT work out?

  32. TDT
    Posted January 30, 2008 at 2:25 pm | Permalink

    Yes KFG, I am assuming he will win in November. I really am.

  33. TDT
    Posted January 30, 2008 at 2:26 pm | Permalink

    Those weren’t my words. Are you talking about King George, because I saw right through that, and could not believe that there were enough people stupid enough to vote for him so that he won the election, either time. I still don’t quite believe it.

  34. ksfarmgrrl
    Posted January 30, 2008 at 2:29 pm | Permalink

    ?

  35. ksfarmgrrl
    Posted January 30, 2008 at 2:31 pm | Permalink

    These are not your words?

    “He survived impeachment, but it wasted 3 years out of his damn presidency. And as I posted on the Kennedy thread, he supported NAFTA, which was G.H.W. Bush’s baby, and one of his first policies to implement was the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” which is bullshit. I voted for him twice, but the Clinton’s have had their chance and they could not keep the Republicans at bay, so Bill ended up pandering to them with compromise, the same thing that Hillary will do.”

    Were you trolled?

  36. ksfarmgrrl
    Posted January 30, 2008 at 6:11 pm | Permalink

    Still waiting for an answer, not a tirade about Hillary, TDT.

  37. Kev
    Posted January 31, 2008 at 7:33 am | Permalink

    The speech was fine for the occassion. Although I am a “political warrior”, the nation is not in the mood right now for her to get up there and dump boiling water on Bush or give a hellfire speech. Save it for the campaign ahead!

  38. Posted January 31, 2008 at 7:40 am | Permalink

    Farmie,

    I think Obama will face Bill’s fate. He will approach the –right- with open arms and bipartisanship and the –right- will spit in his face and through up every road block imaginable.

    Hillary may go in with bared teeth, but she will face the same.

  39. Posted January 31, 2008 at 7:40 am | Permalink

    throw - wtf man, I need to wake up.

  40. TDT
    Posted January 31, 2008 at 10:06 am | Permalink

    KFG, I was not trolled. I voted for Clinton both times, however, my point is that he was not able to keep the Republicans at bay.

7 Trackbacks

  1. By anus on February 7, 2008 at 4:00 pm

    anus…

    cool site !!!…

  2. By Jack on February 9, 2008 at 1:00 am

    Jack…

    I love this web stuff!…

  3. By Back Fulfillment And on February 10, 2008 at 2:53 pm

    How to have a fulfilling, abundant life filled with joy, peace, happiness, and good health……

    How to be in harmony with the The Universal Laws? … How to understand them and use them to our advantage?…

  4. By Eric on February 13, 2008 at 12:54 pm

    Eric…

    Man i love reading your blog, interesting posts !…

  5. By Pee Female Pee Pee Hole on February 19, 2008 at 10:52 pm

    Pee Female Pee Pee Hole…

    I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view…

  6. By Ass Thick Ass Babes Kick Ass on February 21, 2008 at 12:54 pm

    Ass Thick Ass Babes Kick Ass…

    I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view…

  7. By CC Jesup on March 5, 2008 at 8:15 am

    CC Jesup…

    thanks thats a great post maybe a little confused….