…

Thanks for the nice read, keep up the interesting posts…..

And if it is not the Clinton’s, it must be Al Gore.

And if it is not Al Gore, it must be John Kerry.

And if not John Kerry, it must be some other damned Democrat.

God knows it couldn’t be a Republic at fault for anything.

Right?

Yeah…………..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M-X9tEOp19o

Clinton also lost his law license, as the result of a disbarrment lawsuit, brought by the Arkansas Supreme Court under Arkansas disbarrment statutes.

Clinton could not win, in court, under libel or slander laws, against anyone who said that Bill Clinton was disbarred.

Truth is an absolute defense.

Voluntarily, Paul, Clinton did not contest it, as he could have and he would most likely have won.

And yes I read where some idiot claimed that Hillary paid his $25K fine.

As usual, more BS from the right wing spin machine.

And Paul, a suspension is DIFFERENT from disbarment…………..

On April 12, 1999, Wright found Clinton in contempt of court for “intentionally false” testimony in Jones v. Clinton, fined him $90,000, and referred the case to the Arkansas Supreme Court’s Committee on Professional Conduct, as Clinton still possessed a law license in Arkansas.[1]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clinton_v._Jones

:D

The Arkansas Supreme Court suspended Clinton’s Arkansas law license in April 2000. On January 19, 2001, Clinton agreed to a five-year suspension and a $25,000 fine in order to avoid disbarment and to end the investigation of Independent Counsel Robert Ray (Starr’s successor). On October 1, 2001, Clinton’s U.S. Supreme Court law license was suspended, with 40 days to contest his disbarment. On November 9, 2001, the last day for Clinton to contest the disbarment, he opted to resign from the Supreme Court Bar, surrendering his license, rather than facing penalties related to disbarment.

Wikipedia

Bill Clinton WAS disbarred.

“In April, Clinton’s Arkansas law license was suspended for five years and he paid a $25,000 fine. The original disbarment lawsuit was brought by a committee of the Arkansas Supreme Court.”

http://famguardian.org/Subjects/LawAndGovt/News/ClintonDisbar-011001.htm

I will do just fine, no matter who wins, thank you.

You will doubtless be disappointed, no matter who wins, because nobody really agrees with you on very much.

That is not exactly an accident, since the right wing club here normally choose to try to bastardize my name.

“Why would these legal bodies do this, if there was no legal finding of perjury?”

There has never been a legal finding of perjury against Bill Clinton – he has never been charged nor convicted in a criminal proceeding.

End of story.

WS

For Heaven’s sake, grow up, you lost this one.

The Associated Press:
http://famguardian.org/Subjects/LawAndGovt/News/ClintonDisbar-011001.htm

You never tell us the good things (in your mind) about your candidates, you just go on and on and on and on and on and on about the Clintons, Gore and Kerry.

You know, a good mental health professional can help you with your fixations.

Why would these legal bodies do this, if there was no legal finding of perjury? A crime was committed.
Clinton was punished for that crime.

You lost.

Voluntarily surrendering his license is much different than being disbarred.

“Being disbarred = loosing your law license.”

First of all, it would be “losing your law license.”

Second of all, your blind hatred of all things Clinton makes you irrational Rossell.

And, what was Bill going to run for after the Monica thing? He was in the middle of his second and last term as president………..

He voluntarily surrendered his law license.

End of story.

Being disbarred = loosing your law license.

He did not have the legal ability to represent anyone.

He would have faced severe penalties for practicing law, during that period.

HE LOST HIS LICENSE!

Why? If he was criminally liable, he should have been prosecuted. He had paid CIVIL penalties, but NO criminal penalties.

I thought you Republics were all about the rule of law.

Guess not.

You were very sure that Bill Clinton was not disbarred, and you falsely “corrected” me on the issue.

Bill Clinton WAS disbarred.

If you were an honest person, you would admit that you were wrong and concede that point.

I guess that honesty and fair play do not matter much to you, huh?

You have NEVER beaten me, Rossell, ever.

The SCOTUS denying Clinton the ability to argue a case before them did not remove his law license.

End of story.

And……………………

“Those Republicans you mention ARENT RUNNING for anything, are they?”

They did and the Republics gave them a pass, even while pushing for Clinton’s impeachment.

You are way tooooooooooooo easy, Rossell.

And, by the way, what office did Clinton run for after the Monica situation?

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm???????????????????????????

Yes, I am WINNING again.

I know that you are spelling challenged, just as I am, so I will accept your compliment.

I of course meant, “in law, there is such a thing as double jeopardy” —

My point, of course, is that there was no point in going after Clinton, legally, after he was out of office. He had paid a penalty. Also, part of Monica’s settlement might well have prevented her from speaking against Bill, in any future case.

It IS well known.

And you are whining. AGAIN!

Republicans that screw up are, obviously fair game, when THEY run for office.

Those Republicans you mention ARENT RUNNING for anything, are they?

Also, Clinton was disbarred, and you said he was not. More than that, you stated that I was wrong on that issue.

You lost tonight.

You lost big.

You made a factually incorrect statement and you were very, very sure of yourself.

You were then proven wrong.

Melt down? Have I ever had anything posted that was so obnoxious it got deleted?

No candidate for office would EVER let you speak for him or her. You are crude and do not know the basic rules of public discourse.

Prove me wrong, Juvenile.

Find a candidate that WANTS to be associated with you, publicly.

Personal attacks are way out of line, but you don’t know how to argue with logic or facts, so you always get personal.