<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Texas the next battle in evolution wars</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/12/texas-the-next/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/12/texas-the-next/</link>
	<description>The Wichita Eagle Editorial Department Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:14:35 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: J R</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/12/texas-the-next/#comment-147224</link>
		<dc:creator>J R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 21:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2007/12/weblog200712texas-the-nexthtml/#comment-147224</guid>
		<description>Yeah well you come on back and wave it in my face when ya get the kids being taught that dinosaurs and humans lived side by side and that the Earth is only a few thousand years old there Ron. We got away from that business starting almost a century ago in the schools. We&#039;ll not be going back to it. Sorry.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah well you come on back and wave it in my face when ya get the kids being taught that dinosaurs and humans lived side by side and that the Earth is only a few thousand years old there Ron. We got away from that business starting almost a century ago in the schools. We&#8217;ll not be going back to it. Sorry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronald Cote</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/12/texas-the-next/#comment-147223</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronald Cote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 21:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2007/12/weblog200712texas-the-nexthtml/#comment-147223</guid>
		<description>Hey JR. I do care what you believe and moreso, I care what your kids believe with the fervent hope that they don&#039;t inherit their father&#039;s myopia. Reread my blog of 12/29 as it seems that you have met the citeria for all 8 points. So thanks again, I know your bell has been rung and your frustration is apparent.Nothing that you have said causes me to stumble as you have contributed nothing of substance. Keep evolving, though and you&#039;ll get there!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey JR. I do care what you believe and moreso, I care what your kids believe with the fervent hope that they don&#8217;t inherit their father&#8217;s myopia. Reread my blog of 12/29 as it seems that you have met the citeria for all 8 points. So thanks again, I know your bell has been rung and your frustration is apparent.Nothing that you have said causes me to stumble as you have contributed nothing of substance. Keep evolving, though and you&#8217;ll get there!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J R</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/12/texas-the-next/#comment-147222</link>
		<dc:creator>J R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 00:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2007/12/weblog200712texas-the-nexthtml/#comment-147222</guid>
		<description>Hey Ron?

I don&#039;t care what you BELIEVE.

My kid believes in Santa Clause. That&#039;s harmless. So are you.

But.

I don&#039;t want someone like you anywhere near the education system.

And that is precisely where you and creation &quot;science&quot; will remain....FAR away from the education system.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Ron?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t care what you BELIEVE.</p>
<p>My kid believes in Santa Clause. That&#8217;s harmless. So are you.</p>
<p>But.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t want someone like you anywhere near the education system.</p>
<p>And that is precisely where you and creation &#8220;science&#8221; will remain&#8230;.FAR away from the education system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronald Cote</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/12/texas-the-next/#comment-147221</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronald Cote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 00:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2007/12/weblog200712texas-the-nexthtml/#comment-147221</guid>
		<description>The measurement of how well I am able to upset evols is in direct proportion to: 1)the names I am called, 2)the wish for me to go away, 3) the number of denials,4) the insults, 5) questioning my credentials, 6) absence of any substantive scientific rebuttals, 7) vitriol, 8) obviation of ignorance in responses etc., etc.On these bases, my blogs have met with unqualified success beyond my wildest dreams. Thanks evols!Note to Kansas, I don&#039;t know where you interpreted that I&#039;m predicting the mind of God, Heaven forbid. It is refreshing to be joined by a Christian. Maybe our differences are miniscule.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The measurement of how well I am able to upset evols is in direct proportion to: 1)the names I am called, 2)the wish for me to go away, 3) the number of denials,4) the insults, 5) questioning my credentials, 6) absence of any substantive scientific rebuttals, 7) vitriol, 8) obviation of ignorance in responses etc., etc.On these bases, my blogs have met with unqualified success beyond my wildest dreams. Thanks evols!Note to Kansas, I don&#8217;t know where you interpreted that I&#8217;m predicting the mind of God, Heaven forbid. It is refreshing to be joined by a Christian. Maybe our differences are miniscule.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J R</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/12/texas-the-next/#comment-147220</link>
		<dc:creator>J R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 03:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2007/12/weblog200712texas-the-nexthtml/#comment-147220</guid>
		<description>Should I ring the last bell on ol&#039; Ron or have him stumble around some more?

Your &quot;scientific&quot; models you cite there Ron? Did they include all the things J M Walker mentions AND little population reducers like several hundred wars, plagues, mass exterminations, mass starvations, etcetera?

Dinosaurs and man side by side is fiction.

Rant away on more interesting things like the golden spiral or the prevalence of the number 5.THOSE at least are....interesting.

I think someone once posted about an ohmsian argument or some such. You could go that way. The gist was the world was created as if it had existed for a long time. Trees with age rings in the garden of eden and the like.

But dinosaurs and man walking together is where you want me to go.

Sorry. None of my ancestors were there. I won&#039;t imagine it either.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should I ring the last bell on ol&#8217; Ron or have him stumble around some more?</p>
<p>Your &#8220;scientific&#8221; models you cite there Ron? Did they include all the things J M Walker mentions AND little population reducers like several hundred wars, plagues, mass exterminations, mass starvations, etcetera?</p>
<p>Dinosaurs and man side by side is fiction.</p>
<p>Rant away on more interesting things like the golden spiral or the prevalence of the number 5.THOSE at least are&#8230;.interesting.</p>
<p>I think someone once posted about an ohmsian argument or some such. You could go that way. The gist was the world was created as if it had existed for a long time. Trees with age rings in the garden of eden and the like.</p>
<p>But dinosaurs and man walking together is where you want me to go.</p>
<p>Sorry. None of my ancestors were there. I won&#8217;t imagine it either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J M Walker</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/12/texas-the-next/#comment-147219</link>
		<dc:creator>J M Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 01:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2007/12/weblog200712texas-the-nexthtml/#comment-147219</guid>
		<description>&quot;Evolutionists generally believe that modern humans existed about 500,000 years ago but estimates range from 100,000 to 500,000 years.&quot;

Posted by RC

Wrong: evolutionists and archaeologists now think man has been around for over 1 million years. Not modern man, of course, but his ancestors (hey, might have been that little monkey you look a bit like).

&quot;Demographers have been able to develop mathematical formulas to explain many things. In terms of population, they have taken into account a variety of factors to arrive at an average world annual population growth rate. Factors include average life spans, number of child bearing years, average number of children per couple, mortality rates and other pertinent factors including actual annual population growth experienced over the past centuries. The statistical formula that was developed using all of these factors was .455% as an average annual population rate of growth.&quot;

What it fails to take into account is how violent the earth itself is. There are many geological records indicating ice ages, which, many think, wiped out all but about 1000 humans. Said humans being from an African tribe, traceable today via DNA.

O, except for part four: If the flood wiped out all life but that on the Ark, where did that life come from, and how many people were killed?  Could be your millions? How long did they inhabit the earth?

Plus: Life itself was very difficult for early man: Natural disaster (fires, floods, earthquakes, radical temp changes due to volcanic activity, etc.), disease, tribal war over territory. Trying to stay alive was higher on the list than writing, agriculture or city building. Early man was a nomad.

Sorry, dude. I think God made man with the intelligence to figure out mans&#039; past, and it really has nothing to do with ID. Beside, what the hell difference does it make if mans&#039; 500, 5000 or 5,000,000 years old? Do you really think God gives a crap? Now that&#039;s arrogance.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Evolutionists generally believe that modern humans existed about 500,000 years ago but estimates range from 100,000 to 500,000 years.&#8221;</p>
<p>Posted by RC</p>
<p>Wrong: evolutionists and archaeologists now think man has been around for over 1 million years. Not modern man, of course, but his ancestors (hey, might have been that little monkey you look a bit like).</p>
<p>&#8220;Demographers have been able to develop mathematical formulas to explain many things. In terms of population, they have taken into account a variety of factors to arrive at an average world annual population growth rate. Factors include average life spans, number of child bearing years, average number of children per couple, mortality rates and other pertinent factors including actual annual population growth experienced over the past centuries. The statistical formula that was developed using all of these factors was .455% as an average annual population rate of growth.&#8221;</p>
<p>What it fails to take into account is how violent the earth itself is. There are many geological records indicating ice ages, which, many think, wiped out all but about 1000 humans. Said humans being from an African tribe, traceable today via DNA.</p>
<p>O, except for part four: If the flood wiped out all life but that on the Ark, where did that life come from, and how many people were killed?  Could be your millions? How long did they inhabit the earth?</p>
<p>Plus: Life itself was very difficult for early man: Natural disaster (fires, floods, earthquakes, radical temp changes due to volcanic activity, etc.), disease, tribal war over territory. Trying to stay alive was higher on the list than writing, agriculture or city building. Early man was a nomad.</p>
<p>Sorry, dude. I think God made man with the intelligence to figure out mans&#8217; past, and it really has nothing to do with ID. Beside, what the hell difference does it make if mans&#8217; 500, 5000 or 5,000,000 years old? Do you really think God gives a crap? Now that&#8217;s arrogance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kansas</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/12/texas-the-next/#comment-147218</link>
		<dc:creator>Kansas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 01:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2007/12/weblog200712texas-the-nexthtml/#comment-147218</guid>
		<description>Ronald Cote, I&#039;m a Christian who happens to be educated with quite a few college level science and engineering courses under my belt. B.S. and M.S.

What you are trying to do is to know and predict the mind of God.

I&#039;m sorry, but that is not possible, nor will it ever be.

I still have my views on creation and how evolution fits inside of that concept.

I can&#039;t prove it, nor do I need to it. My faith carries me through.

However, I do depend on science to explain what is in front of me and what is around me.

I don&#039;t use science to predict what is beyond me that cannot be known.

That&#039;s where you and I differ.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ronald Cote, I&#8217;m a Christian who happens to be educated with quite a few college level science and engineering courses under my belt. B.S. and M.S.</p>
<p>What you are trying to do is to know and predict the mind of God.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry, but that is not possible, nor will it ever be.</p>
<p>I still have my views on creation and how evolution fits inside of that concept.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t prove it, nor do I need to it. My faith carries me through.</p>
<p>However, I do depend on science to explain what is in front of me and what is around me.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t use science to predict what is beyond me that cannot be known.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s where you and I differ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J M Walker</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/12/texas-the-next/#comment-147217</link>
		<dc:creator>J M Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 01:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2007/12/weblog200712texas-the-nexthtml/#comment-147217</guid>
		<description>J R, here&#039;s the link bozo was trying to foist off: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.subversiveelement.com/MKHome.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.subversiveelement.com/MKHome.html&lt;/a&gt;

This place is about mind control and the governments trying to do the same. This is way far out wing-nut cracker crap. If that&#039;s all the ID crowd has to offer, then their trip to the edge of the world should go quite swimmingly.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>J R, here&#8217;s the link bozo was trying to foist off: <a href="http://www.subversiveelement.com/MKHome.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.subversiveelement.com/MKHome.html</a></p>
<p>This place is about mind control and the governments trying to do the same. This is way far out wing-nut cracker crap. If that&#8217;s all the ID crowd has to offer, then their trip to the edge of the world should go quite swimmingly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apophis</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/12/texas-the-next/#comment-147216</link>
		<dc:creator>Apophis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 00:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2007/12/weblog200712texas-the-nexthtml/#comment-147216</guid>
		<description>Cote......don&#039;t you get it?

You are considered a crackpot on this blog.  Take your creationist garbage somewhere else.

Long live the Flying Spaghetti Monster!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cote&#8230;&#8230;don&#8217;t you get it?</p>
<p>You are considered a crackpot on this blog.  Take your creationist garbage somewhere else.</p>
<p>Long live the Flying Spaghetti Monster!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronald Cote</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/12/texas-the-next/#comment-147215</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronald Cote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 00:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2007/12/weblog200712texas-the-nexthtml/#comment-147215</guid>
		<description>JR, I enjoy these exchanges, just wish you had more to offer. You ask for a link and refuse to access it apparently afraid it will blow you further out of the water! There are 139 positive instances of human prints found in or near dino prints. Did you think they would be found on evol websites? That would be tantamount to shooting an evol in the footprint and shattering his sacred myth!Well even after giving a dozen or so examples, you don’t want to discuss footprints so let us examine demographics. I will eagerly await your studied, academic and scientific rebuttal. I do not expect an intelligent response from you but maybe someone will gain from it.Evolutionists generally believe that modern humans existed about 500,000 years ago but estimates range from 100,000 to 500,000 years.
In July of 1999, it was estimated that the world’s population of humans had reached six billion. The population in year 2004 has been estimated at 6.3 billion.Demographers have been able to develop mathematical formulas to explain many things. In terms of population, they have taken into account a variety of factors to arrive at an average world annual population growth rate. Factors include average life spans, number of child bearing years, average number of children per couple, mortality rates and other pertinent factors including actual annual population growth experienced over the past centuries. The statistical formula that was developed using all of these factors was .455% as an average annual population rate of growth.Using this proven and reliable statistic, and based on the claim of man appearing 500,000 years ago and also assuming the existence of only one man and one woman, the world population in 2004 would be the number 2.155 followed by 985 zeros. This is an incomprehensible number and obviously not true. One can conclude from this that man could not have appeared 500,000 years ago.Under a second scenario, using a conservative assumption that man appeared on earth 100,000 years ago and that the annual growth rate was only .1%, rather than the accepted .455%. Assuming also that there were only two humans, one man and one woman, the population in 2004 would be 5.38 followed by 41 zeroes. This still remains a figure hugely larger than what the world has actually experienced.Under a third scenario using 25,000 years since modern man appeared, and using an ultra conservative annual growth rate of only .1%, and again basing the figures on only one man and one woman, the total is 1.44 followed by 9 zeroes. This results in a number that is 24 times greater than our actual population and obviously grossly incorrect.
A fourth scenario is to consider the biblical account of Noah’s Ark and a worldwide flood occurring 4,500 years ago, with eight survivors. Using the acknowledged accurate figure of .455% as the correct world annual population growth rate, the number computes to 6,300,000,000 as the population in 2004! This is exactly correct!!What we can conclude from these mathematical exercises is that modern man could not have appeared on planet earth 500,000, 100,000 or even 25,000 years ago and still produce the current population figures of today. In attempting to be extremely conservative by reducing the figures for annual growth rates and number of years for man to have been on earth still does not compute to current population.The only scenario that corresponds to the world’s actual population is that which relates to eight people, 4,500 years ago using the correct .455% figure!Your account of 13 or14 ribs is mind numbing.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JR, I enjoy these exchanges, just wish you had more to offer. You ask for a link and refuse to access it apparently afraid it will blow you further out of the water! There are 139 positive instances of human prints found in or near dino prints. Did you think they would be found on evol websites? That would be tantamount to shooting an evol in the footprint and shattering his sacred myth!Well even after giving a dozen or so examples, you don’t want to discuss footprints so let us examine demographics. I will eagerly await your studied, academic and scientific rebuttal. I do not expect an intelligent response from you but maybe someone will gain from it.Evolutionists generally believe that modern humans existed about 500,000 years ago but estimates range from 100,000 to 500,000 years.<br />
In July of 1999, it was estimated that the world’s population of humans had reached six billion. The population in year 2004 has been estimated at 6.3 billion.Demographers have been able to develop mathematical formulas to explain many things. In terms of population, they have taken into account a variety of factors to arrive at an average world annual population growth rate. Factors include average life spans, number of child bearing years, average number of children per couple, mortality rates and other pertinent factors including actual annual population growth experienced over the past centuries. The statistical formula that was developed using all of these factors was .455% as an average annual population rate of growth.Using this proven and reliable statistic, and based on the claim of man appearing 500,000 years ago and also assuming the existence of only one man and one woman, the world population in 2004 would be the number 2.155 followed by 985 zeros. This is an incomprehensible number and obviously not true. One can conclude from this that man could not have appeared 500,000 years ago.Under a second scenario, using a conservative assumption that man appeared on earth 100,000 years ago and that the annual growth rate was only .1%, rather than the accepted .455%. Assuming also that there were only two humans, one man and one woman, the population in 2004 would be 5.38 followed by 41 zeroes. This still remains a figure hugely larger than what the world has actually experienced.Under a third scenario using 25,000 years since modern man appeared, and using an ultra conservative annual growth rate of only .1%, and again basing the figures on only one man and one woman, the total is 1.44 followed by 9 zeroes. This results in a number that is 24 times greater than our actual population and obviously grossly incorrect.<br />
A fourth scenario is to consider the biblical account of Noah’s Ark and a worldwide flood occurring 4,500 years ago, with eight survivors. Using the acknowledged accurate figure of .455% as the correct world annual population growth rate, the number computes to 6,300,000,000 as the population in 2004! This is exactly correct!!What we can conclude from these mathematical exercises is that modern man could not have appeared on planet earth 500,000, 100,000 or even 25,000 years ago and still produce the current population figures of today. In attempting to be extremely conservative by reducing the figures for annual growth rates and number of years for man to have been on earth still does not compute to current population.The only scenario that corresponds to the world’s actual population is that which relates to eight people, 4,500 years ago using the correct .455% figure!Your account of 13 or14 ribs is mind numbing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J R</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/12/texas-the-next/#comment-147214</link>
		<dc:creator>J R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 03:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2007/12/weblog200712texas-the-nexthtml/#comment-147214</guid>
		<description>Didya notice something there Ron?

It&#039;s pretty MUCH just me and you &quot;here&quot; on this thread for about oh 4 days now.

Dumbing down my posts? More like winding down. I&#039;m just carrying you another couple rounds you haven&#039;t earned so you can make yourself an even BIGGER fool.

Look around. SINCE you made your &quot;dinosaur and man footprints found together&quot; post, well it&#039;s got pretty lonely for you hasn&#039;t it?

Hey I started OUT kind enough. You made an extraordinary claim and I invited you to give evidence.

Now the claim you make? That dinosaurs walked alongside man? Well that sort of news if even REMOTELY credible would shake the world. YOU make me go looking for it with a link you want me to type in? Weak.

Extraordinary claims require at least MARGINAL proof.

Oh and your worry as to students being exposed to alternatives?

Let me share a little story with you.

First, let me introduce myself. I&#039;m 40ish. Very little exposure to church.

Junior high science 19late70&#039;s Teacher asks &quot;How many ribs does a woman have?&quot;  The class AND me answers in unison &quot;14!&quot;  (That may not be correct now. But me and the class were correct then whatever number we said.) So then the teacher asks &quot;And how many ribs does a man have?&quot;

&quot;13!&quot; I and the class answer.

(Again, my memory may have failed on the number.)

SEE? The whole class and even me were using our religious biased answer to a basic anatomy question. The Adam&#039;s rib bit? Yeah.   Now I don&#039;t have any PROOF of that. But I did spend the time to type it. That lends me a little validity I think. I&#039;ve no record here for outright lies.

So ya see? I don&#039;t have any fear at all that your take on &quot;science&quot; aint getting a fair hearing. I personally know better.

If anything, religious dogma is TOO persuasive in American culture.  A class of 25 kids gets a basic anatomy question wrong because of it.

Now if you have PROOF that you want to lay out that dinosaurs and humans walked together? What are you shy? Fine post your proof here and I will get the story on every format on the planet. But first ya gotta convince me.

And unless you have that or better or can otherwise amuse me, it&#039;s time for me to be merciful and let ya hit the canvas.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didya notice something there Ron?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s pretty MUCH just me and you &#8220;here&#8221; on this thread for about oh 4 days now.</p>
<p>Dumbing down my posts? More like winding down. I&#8217;m just carrying you another couple rounds you haven&#8217;t earned so you can make yourself an even BIGGER fool.</p>
<p>Look around. SINCE you made your &#8220;dinosaur and man footprints found together&#8221; post, well it&#8217;s got pretty lonely for you hasn&#8217;t it?</p>
<p>Hey I started OUT kind enough. You made an extraordinary claim and I invited you to give evidence.</p>
<p>Now the claim you make? That dinosaurs walked alongside man? Well that sort of news if even REMOTELY credible would shake the world. YOU make me go looking for it with a link you want me to type in? Weak.</p>
<p>Extraordinary claims require at least MARGINAL proof.</p>
<p>Oh and your worry as to students being exposed to alternatives?</p>
<p>Let me share a little story with you.</p>
<p>First, let me introduce myself. I&#8217;m 40ish. Very little exposure to church.</p>
<p>Junior high science 19late70&#8217;s Teacher asks &#8220;How many ribs does a woman have?&#8221;  The class AND me answers in unison &#8220;14!&#8221;  (That may not be correct now. But me and the class were correct then whatever number we said.) So then the teacher asks &#8220;And how many ribs does a man have?&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;13!&#8221; I and the class answer.</p>
<p>(Again, my memory may have failed on the number.)</p>
<p>SEE? The whole class and even me were using our religious biased answer to a basic anatomy question. The Adam&#8217;s rib bit? Yeah.   Now I don&#8217;t have any PROOF of that. But I did spend the time to type it. That lends me a little validity I think. I&#8217;ve no record here for outright lies.</p>
<p>So ya see? I don&#8217;t have any fear at all that your take on &#8220;science&#8221; aint getting a fair hearing. I personally know better.</p>
<p>If anything, religious dogma is TOO persuasive in American culture.  A class of 25 kids gets a basic anatomy question wrong because of it.</p>
<p>Now if you have PROOF that you want to lay out that dinosaurs and humans walked together? What are you shy? Fine post your proof here and I will get the story on every format on the planet. But first ya gotta convince me.</p>
<p>And unless you have that or better or can otherwise amuse me, it&#8217;s time for me to be merciful and let ya hit the canvas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronald Cote</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/12/texas-the-next/#comment-147213</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronald Cote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 02:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2007/12/weblog200712texas-the-nexthtml/#comment-147213</guid>
		<description>JR, You wanted a link, I gave you one. Now you say you are too lazy to complete it. Then having refused to find the site, you claim it as half baked proof. Boy, are your true colors transparent!Evolution should be taught in schools because it remains for now a contemporary controversy. Creationism and ID are antitheses and as such should be presented in the same classroom. As a Creationist, I have taught other theories in high school biology. It provides a challenge to them. We should be willing to expose students to all sides, where evols shudder to do so for fear of exposing their myth to scrutiny. Why are you scared stiff to present it in school??  By the way, I have no problem with sleep, but would bet that you do. Another brilliant point, from you! You seem desperate in that each blog seems to get dumber. And how about my prediction that you would deny the link that you requested. Am I perceptive or what?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JR, You wanted a link, I gave you one. Now you say you are too lazy to complete it. Then having refused to find the site, you claim it as half baked proof. Boy, are your true colors transparent!Evolution should be taught in schools because it remains for now a contemporary controversy. Creationism and ID are antitheses and as such should be presented in the same classroom. As a Creationist, I have taught other theories in high school biology. It provides a challenge to them. We should be willing to expose students to all sides, where evols shudder to do so for fear of exposing their myth to scrutiny. Why are you scared stiff to present it in school??  By the way, I have no problem with sleep, but would bet that you do. Another brilliant point, from you! You seem desperate in that each blog seems to get dumber. And how about my prediction that you would deny the link that you requested. Am I perceptive or what?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apophis</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/12/texas-the-next/#comment-147212</link>
		<dc:creator>Apophis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 22:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2007/12/weblog200712texas-the-nexthtml/#comment-147212</guid>
		<description>Ramen JR!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ramen JR!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J R</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/12/texas-the-next/#comment-147211</link>
		<dc:creator>J R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 22:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2007/12/weblog200712texas-the-nexthtml/#comment-147211</guid>
		<description>Post a clickable link. I&#039;m not gonna type all that in just to see your half baked &quot;proof&quot; that dinosaurs walked with man.

Evolution is taught in schools because science is taught in schools. Creationism and intelligent design are components of faith. Teach them away!

In a church.

We will not be teaching them in school again. Live with it. You will sleep better.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Post a clickable link. I&#8217;m not gonna type all that in just to see your half baked &#8220;proof&#8221; that dinosaurs walked with man.</p>
<p>Evolution is taught in schools because science is taught in schools. Creationism and intelligent design are components of faith. Teach them away!</p>
<p>In a church.</p>
<p>We will not be teaching them in school again. Live with it. You will sleep better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronald Cote</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/12/texas-the-next/#comment-147210</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronald Cote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 22:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2007/12/weblog200712texas-the-nexthtml/#comment-147210</guid>
		<description>JR, Duh Yeah that&#039;s odd, I have 6 pages from that link. Is your computer still run on a treadle? If not try plugging it in.It does not surprise me that you couldn&#039;t find it. Go read more science fiction especially where germs turn into humans. Ludicrous!Kansas, I don&#039;t tap dance. Can you teach me or give me a link and I&#039;ll ask JR to find it.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JR, Duh Yeah that&#8217;s odd, I have 6 pages from that link. Is your computer still run on a treadle? If not try plugging it in.It does not surprise me that you couldn&#8217;t find it. Go read more science fiction especially where germs turn into humans. Ludicrous!Kansas, I don&#8217;t tap dance. Can you teach me or give me a link and I&#8217;ll ask JR to find it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J R</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/12/texas-the-next/#comment-147209</link>
		<dc:creator>J R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 01:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2007/12/weblog200712texas-the-nexthtml/#comment-147209</guid>
		<description>Uh Yeah.

Your link is no good. Tried clicking it. No dice.

This does not surprise me.

Go read old Ally oop comics.

Humans and dinosaurs at the same time. Ludicrous.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh Yeah.</p>
<p>Your link is no good. Tried clicking it. No dice.</p>
<p>This does not surprise me.</p>
<p>Go read old Ally oop comics.</p>
<p>Humans and dinosaurs at the same time. Ludicrous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronald Cote</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/12/texas-the-next/#comment-147208</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronald Cote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 01:43:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2007/12/weblog200712texas-the-nexthtml/#comment-147208</guid>
		<description>Ah,evols, whenever evidence and data are provided, the standard response is denial and the frustration from inability to defend is name calling , perfected to an art form by evols over the millions of years.Kansas, is everything you believe based on personal observation and witness? That&#039;s not reality.JR, Clever response! Here&#039;s the link that you will deny anyway &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.subversive&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.subversive&lt;/a&gt; element.com/FossilizedHumanFootprints-ns4.html Say Hi to Charley for me! Calling me a loon must make you feel superior, as it is the mark of the ignorant which in your case must be blissful!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah,evols, whenever evidence and data are provided, the standard response is denial and the frustration from inability to defend is name calling , perfected to an art form by evols over the millions of years.Kansas, is everything you believe based on personal observation and witness? That&#8217;s not reality.JR, Clever response! Here&#8217;s the link that you will deny anyway <a href="http://www.subversive" rel="nofollow">http://www.subversive</a> element.com/FossilizedHumanFootprints-ns4.html Say Hi to Charley for me! Calling me a loon must make you feel superior, as it is the mark of the ignorant which in your case must be blissful!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J R</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/12/texas-the-next/#comment-147207</link>
		<dc:creator>J R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 02:23:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2007/12/weblog200712texas-the-nexthtml/#comment-147207</guid>
		<description>Hey Ron?

Got a link?

Second call.

Extraordinary claims require at least some substantiation.

Humans a dinosaurs living side by side?

Only on &quot;The Flintstones&quot;.

Say hi to Betty and Barney for me.

Loon.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Ron?</p>
<p>Got a link?</p>
<p>Second call.</p>
<p>Extraordinary claims require at least some substantiation.</p>
<p>Humans a dinosaurs living side by side?</p>
<p>Only on &#8220;The Flintstones&#8221;.</p>
<p>Say hi to Betty and Barney for me.</p>
<p>Loon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kansas</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/12/texas-the-next/#comment-147206</link>
		<dc:creator>Kansas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 02:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2007/12/weblog200712texas-the-nexthtml/#comment-147206</guid>
		<description>Actually Ronald Cote, I&#039;m not an evolution. I do study science though and I am a Christian.

One must be skeptical to be a scientist.  To swallow something whole without even witnessing and event or seeing it in person is not first hand knowledge.

That, within itself is a dangerous path on evidence that cannot be repeated - You know - scientific method.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually Ronald Cote, I&#8217;m not an evolution. I do study science though and I am a Christian.</p>
<p>One must be skeptical to be a scientist.  To swallow something whole without even witnessing and event or seeing it in person is not first hand knowledge.</p>
<p>That, within itself is a dangerous path on evidence that cannot be repeated &#8211; You know &#8211; scientific method.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kansas</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/12/texas-the-next/#comment-147205</link>
		<dc:creator>Kansas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 01:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2007/12/weblog200712texas-the-nexthtml/#comment-147205</guid>
		<description>Ronald Cote, I&#039;ve seen them with my own eyes.  They look like two different shapes and not like footprints.  I have no idea where they got the foot impressions from in the photos, but they weren&#039;t from the places I personally witnessed.

Wasn&#039;t even close.

I don&#039;t know about those other place, I mentioned I Texas only.

But nice try - do you tap dance as well?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ronald Cote, I&#8217;ve seen them with my own eyes.  They look like two different shapes and not like footprints.  I have no idea where they got the foot impressions from in the photos, but they weren&#8217;t from the places I personally witnessed.</p>
<p>Wasn&#8217;t even close.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know about those other place, I mentioned I Texas only.</p>
<p>But nice try &#8211; do you tap dance as well?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronald Cote</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/12/texas-the-next/#comment-147204</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronald Cote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 01:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2007/12/weblog200712texas-the-nexthtml/#comment-147204</guid>
		<description>Kansas, your conclusions are astounding. Of the dozens of human footprints found along side dino prints, they can all be explained as depressions from natural erosions?. Is that also the explanation for how the dino prints were formed?Does your explanation also explain:1) The three prints of moccasined prints found on the Little Cheyenne River In South   Dakota?2) Giant tracks found in Great White Sands, New Mexico in 1931?3) the 13 imprints found in the San Andreas Mountains?4) The sandal print crushing a trilobite?5) the huge footprints found in 1882 in Carson City, Nevada?6) the imprint of a leather shoe in Fisher Canyon, Nevada?7) the human footprint found near the Gediz River in Turkey ?There are many more examples which I am sure you can also explain with the formation of a rock forming the heel with water rushing to make divots.As soon as spring arrives, I will be out there with my hose, dirt and rock making footprints.
Your statements are so ludicrous as to aptly demonstrate the desperation of your beliefs and the pains you go through to justify the poverty of your myth. I pity you and your fellow evols for the desperation you must feel in having to continuously bolster your faith with trivia and lies in order to maintain your faith in a falsehood.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kansas, your conclusions are astounding. Of the dozens of human footprints found along side dino prints, they can all be explained as depressions from natural erosions?. Is that also the explanation for how the dino prints were formed?Does your explanation also explain:1) The three prints of moccasined prints found on the Little Cheyenne River In South   Dakota?2) Giant tracks found in Great White Sands, New Mexico in 1931?3) the 13 imprints found in the San Andreas Mountains?4) The sandal print crushing a trilobite?5) the huge footprints found in 1882 in Carson City, Nevada?6) the imprint of a leather shoe in Fisher Canyon, Nevada?7) the human footprint found near the Gediz River in Turkey ?There are many more examples which I am sure you can also explain with the formation of a rock forming the heel with water rushing to make divots.As soon as spring arrives, I will be out there with my hose, dirt and rock making footprints.<br />
Your statements are so ludicrous as to aptly demonstrate the desperation of your beliefs and the pains you go through to justify the poverty of your myth. I pity you and your fellow evols for the desperation you must feel in having to continuously bolster your faith with trivia and lies in order to maintain your faith in a falsehood.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apophis</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/12/texas-the-next/#comment-147203</link>
		<dc:creator>Apophis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 02:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2007/12/weblog200712texas-the-nexthtml/#comment-147203</guid>
		<description>Well Kansas....we actually agree on something.

It must be the Christmas season.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Kansas&#8230;.we actually agree on something.</p>
<p>It must be the Christmas season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kansas</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/12/texas-the-next/#comment-147202</link>
		<dc:creator>Kansas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 01:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2007/12/weblog200712texas-the-nexthtml/#comment-147202</guid>
		<description>Sorry about that Ronald Cote,

I went on a tour of that area when I lived in Texas and the footprints are definitely not human.

The depressions are natural erosions.  In fact, our teacher at the time took as to a local stream and showed us similar looking footprints in a newly formed stream from a flood.  In those &quot;prints&quot; there was a heel and a front part of a foot. Looked convincing, but the formation was provided by a rock for the heel and the front part was when the water rushing around the rock made divots.

I forgot the specific term for the geological erosion, but it does have a name.

Don&#039;t believe me? Experiment with it yourself -  water hose and dirt are required for your backyard experiment.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry about that Ronald Cote,</p>
<p>I went on a tour of that area when I lived in Texas and the footprints are definitely not human.</p>
<p>The depressions are natural erosions.  In fact, our teacher at the time took as to a local stream and showed us similar looking footprints in a newly formed stream from a flood.  In those &#8220;prints&#8221; there was a heel and a front part of a foot. Looked convincing, but the formation was provided by a rock for the heel and the front part was when the water rushing around the rock made divots.</p>
<p>I forgot the specific term for the geological erosion, but it does have a name.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t believe me? Experiment with it yourself &#8211;  water hose and dirt are required for your backyard experiment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/12/texas-the-next/#comment-147201</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 01:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2007/12/weblog200712texas-the-nexthtml/#comment-147201</guid>
		<description>&quot;A human footprint across a dinosaur footprint, about 30 feet from the Taylor Platform in the bed of the Paluxy River, near Glen Rose, Texas&quot;

I went down to Glen Rose, TX to the Dinosaur Valley State Park to examine this myself.  The only human footprints were of tourists.  The supposed fossilized print was of a dinosaur which was prevalent in the river bed.  What the creationists claim is that humans used to have a toe sticking out of the back of their heel and three toes in front.  That&#039;s not a human footprint.

What is there to deny?  Certainly not the fact that creationists are liars.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A human footprint across a dinosaur footprint, about 30 feet from the Taylor Platform in the bed of the Paluxy River, near Glen Rose, Texas&#8221;</p>
<p>I went down to Glen Rose, TX to the Dinosaur Valley State Park to examine this myself.  The only human footprints were of tourists.  The supposed fossilized print was of a dinosaur which was prevalent in the river bed.  What the creationists claim is that humans used to have a toe sticking out of the back of their heel and three toes in front.  That&#8217;s not a human footprint.</p>
<p>What is there to deny?  Certainly not the fact that creationists are liars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apophis</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/12/texas-the-next/#comment-147200</link>
		<dc:creator>Apophis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 01:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2007/12/weblog200712texas-the-nexthtml/#comment-147200</guid>
		<description>&quot;just&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;just&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
