In more up-is-down news: House Republicans voted Tuesday to keep alive an effort to impeach Vice President Dick Cheney. The GOP voted for the measure, of course, because they think it could help them by making the Democratic-led Congress appear extreme. But there won’t be any impeachment, as House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and other Democratic leaders don’t want to waste time on a futile effort and give the GOP an issue to energize its demoralized base.
Posted by Phillip Brownlee
Registered?
Commenting on WE Blog now requires you to be a Kansas.com member. Use the links above to register, if you haven't already, or to log in.Contact us
Follow us
Daily Archives
-
Recent Comments
- BlueJay on Open thread 11/22
- Regular on Open thread 11/22
- Regular on Open thread 11/22
- Rage on Open thread 11/22
- cosmos_originally on Open thread 11/22
- Chas on Open thread 11/22
- BlueJay on Open thread 11/22
- Boxlock20 on Open thread 11/22
- satatom on Open thread 11/22
- JimJohnson on Open thread 11/22
130 Comments
Ah, this is great news! Mother Speaker has charted a new course, to wit:
“House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and other Democratic leaders don’t want to waste time on a futile effort…”
I wonder what brought about the change of heart, and when we’ll be able to see some fruit from it.
This is a calculated move to distance the Republican party from any shady deeds Cheney did.
There must be something in the DC air about Cheney’s involvment in things he should not have been involved in.
Add Pelosi to the list along with Schumer and Feinstien. They just won’t do the You People’s business. What good are they?
David – she has said that all along. Impeachment moves are coming from a fairly small fraction – joined by a lot of Republicans.
“House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and other Democratic leaders don’t want to waste time on a futile effort…”
I wonder what brought about the change of heart, and when we’ll be able to see some fruit from it.”
She made that comment or similar one when she took over the speakers chair — so that part is old news
“GOP voted for the measure, of course, because they think it could help them by making the Democratic-led Congress appear extreme.”
and that is good for the country how ?
Phillip,
If you actually followed the voting, which I did, you would have seen that it was the Democrats who were trying to be coy with the voting.
The GOP did the last minute vote change in support of the impeachment to catch the Democrats off guard at their own game.
The fact that you are running this story the way you are is very telling of your bias.
There were about 80 Democrats who were trying to play oppurtunist with the vote in supporting the impeachment so they could be on record as doing such but then table the bill.
The GOP switched their votes to bring the bill to the floor for debate so those Democrats couldn’t get away with their political scheme.
And now you are running the story as if the Republicans are trying to play politics?
The Republicans merely out smarted the Democrats at their own silly political game.
Remember they were the ones who were trying to bring this to the floor, support it, then table it.
Could you at least pretend to act a little bit unbiased when you post stuff to the blog?
Ben,
The Republicans switched their votes to catch the Democrats off guard while the Democrats were trying to play politics with this.
Enough screwing around. Impeach that SOB.
JRThe joke is on YOU, don’t you get it?Your hero, “Dennis” is a wack-job nut case. Your party is running away for “Dennis” (and YOU!)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/11/06/AR2007110602000_pf.html
Maybe someone has surreptitiously been putting testosterone into the Congressional water supply…
LOL brian — good one!!
Boy that’s a good picture of that monster.
Second thought, let’s keep him around. He and bush are like an anchor that will sink the GOP for the next 20 years.
Nathan, I am not sure about your assessment… I think this might be a Republican movement to distance themselves from a lot of the Cheney/Bush chicanery of the past 6 years.
I think we should all just sit back and watch this one develope, and not jump to any foregone conclusions just yet…
Only Repubs. would take the country through impeachment, knowing they didn’t have the votes from the outset. Dems. have higher standards, when they impeach, they will make certain that it is a probability.
How important is it to prevent Iran from getting the A-bomb? Should America try to stop Iran, and to what extent? Do we go to war with Iran to stop this?
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,308903,00.html
Ahmadinejad Announces Iran Uranium Enrichment MilestoneWednesday, November 07, 2007
BIRJAND, Iran (AP) — Iran has achieved a landmark, with 3,000 centrifuges fully working in its controversial uranium enrichment program, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad announced Wednesday.
“We have now reached 3,000 machines,” Ahmadinejad told thousands of Iranians gathered in Birjand, in eastern Iran, in a show of defiance of international demands to halt the program believed to be masking the country’s nuclear arms efforts.
Ahmadinejad has in the past claimed that Iran succeeded in installing the 3,000 centrifuges at its uranium enrichment facility at Natanz. But Wednesday’s claim was his first official statement that the plant is now operating all those centrifuges.
When Iran first announced launching the 3,000 centrifuges in April, the U.N. nuclear watchdog agency, the International Atomic Energy Agency, said Tehran had only 328 centrifuges up and running at Natanz’s underground facility.
In a recent report, drawn up by IAEA chief Mohamed ElBaradei, the agency put the number of centrifuges working in Natanz at close to 2,000, with another 650 being tested.
U.S. experts say 3,000 centrifuges are in theory enough to produce a nuclear weapon, perhaps as soon as within a year.
Iran says it plans to expand its enrichment program to up to 54,000 centrifuges at Natanz in central Iran — which would amount to the level of industrial-scale uranium enrichment.
Two rounds of U.N. Security Council sanctions have failed to persuade Iran to halt the enrichment.
Interesting question Max. However, that suggests a couple more: is enrichment (which is required fir Wolf Creek) automatically bombs? And do we support other proliferation of nuclear arms to other states in the region?
Ben, I screwed up and posted on this thread by mistake. I moved it over to the Open Thread.
Sorry about that folks.
Ben- What type enrichment does Wolf Creek require?
gster – ALL nuclear plants require enriched fuel.
Note the step that makes fuel and depleted uranium as byproduct:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_fuel
Ben– That’s what I was trying to remember from Physics , about 100 years ago. U235 , derived from U238, IIRC.
Back to the topic of impeaching cheney. This thread would be hilarious if not so telling. The self-proclaimed Republicans are saying IOKIYAR! No tricks or “coyness,” or attempts to catch someone off guard is acceptable UNLESS you’re a Republican. And, acting as if impeachment wasn’t always off the table. And, then expecting people to believe what they say! No wonder their leader can fool them so easily.
bush and cheney — the best ambassadors the Democratic Party has ever had! The worst leaders our country has ever had!
Not really derived; just enriched. In other words, with the centrifuges (or gaseous diffusion) we make a Uranium that has a higher % of 235 and split out depleted Uranium with lower 235 than mine-mix.
My nuclear power scenario would involve taking weapons grade material (even more enriched) and back-mixing with depleted to lower the enrichment level to fuel-grade.
You mean not relly? Oh darn….Ok, if Cheney doesn’t get impeached….can we at least shoot him in the face.
Anyone who actually watched the vote and listened to the commentary would know what happened. The dems were outsmarted by the repubs. They (te repubs)said OK – we switch our votes to impeach and bring the debate to the floor. Let the American public see who is running the congress now. The nuts and wackos. When they ‘won’ the dems couldn’t wait to send it to ‘committee’ where it will be deep 6ed forever.
It was funny to see it happening.
Your man Dennis the UFO sighter.
How did Presidential candidate Ron Paul vote?
You mean not relly? Oh darn….Ok, if Cheney doesn’t get impeached….can we at least shoot him in the face.
Posted by: thinkfirst | November 07, 2007 at 02:30 PM
I believe this is a felony/ punishable under federal law to threaten a prz or VP. You should thinkfirst before publishing this in public. I will be sending it to the White House Email address. Good luck with your defense.
“WASHINGTON — House Democrats on Tuesday narrowly managed to avert a bruising debate on a proposal to impeach Vice President Dick Cheney after Republicans, in a surprise maneuver, voted in favor of taking up the measure.
Republicans, changing course midway through a vote, tried to force Democrats into a debate on the resolution sponsored by long-shot presidential candidate Dennis Kucinich.
The anti-war Ohio Democrat’s resolution accuses Cheney of purposely leading the country into war against Iraq.
The GOP tactics reversed what had been expected to be an overwhelming vote to table, or kill, the resolution.
Midway through the vote, with instructions from the GOP leadership, Republicans one by one changed their votes from yes — to kill the resolution — to no, trying to force the chamber into a debate and an up-or-down vote on the proposal.
The Houston-area delegation split, with Republicans John Culberson of Houston, Michael McCaul of Austin and Ted Poe of Humble heeding the request to keep the motion alive to embarrass the Democrats.
GOP Reps. Kevin Brady of The Woodlands and Ron Paul of Lake Jackson voted to kill the measure, as did Democrat Nick Lampson of Stafford. Houston Democrats Al Green, Gene Green and Sheila Jackson-Lee all voted to keep the impeachment resolution alive.”
Ben I had to look it up for you. He really isn’t on my radar screen. He reminds me to much of Perot.
“Your man Dennis the UFO sighter.”
Oh, give me a break. Is that the best you got?****************************Kucinich answered the question as honestly as he could, while neither confirming nor denying MacLaine’s new age flourishes. “It was an unidentified flying object, okay,” he said. “It’s like – it’s unidentified. I saw something.” He made a joke about moving his campaign headquarters to Roswell, New Mexico, and another about more people having seen a UFO than approve of George Bush’s presidency. And that was that.
Except that it wasn’t. Indeed, to judge by the coverage – as intense as any he has received in two presidential campaigns – you would think Kucinich had talked about being kidnapped by little green Martians and brainwashed by their maximum leader.”
http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/dan_kennedy/2007/11/space_cadets.html
And now you are running the story as if the Republicans are trying to play politics?
The Republicans merely out smarted the Democrats at their own silly political game.
Posted by: Nathan | November 07, 2007 at 01:31 PM
I call that “playing politics.”
I hate to admit it, but that was REALLY smart.
I call that “playing politics.”
Posted by: kscitydude
No, it’s only “playing politics” when democrats do it. It’s “intelligent statesmanship” when Republicans do.
Speaking of not too smart.Federal offenses.
“….can we at least shoot him in the face.
Posted by: thinkfirst | November 07, 2007 at 02:30 PM”
I stand corrected Ben. Kinda like political theater.
You might wanna back down Keny.
TDT,
Oh yeah. House Repukes have been punking Pelosi almost from day one. They obstruct, and succeed in getting the national press to blame Democrats for getting nothing done. And then they successfully play divide and conquer with Pelosi and the members of the Democratic Caucus.
Pelosi’s stock is like the Dow: 300 points lost and still falling.
With Cheney’s approval rating, the republicans might be sending bravo’s to their Repub. Senators. Not sure how much leverage the Repubs. think they could possibly have on the impeachment matter.Let’s get Phase 2 out, then impeach the slime balls!
If there are any head shots to be done, I’ll be the one pulling the trigger, so Fck Off!
Ladies and Gentlemen, the Vice-President of the United States; the one you didn’t vote for, but got anyway.
Ever heard the expression, “too clever by half?”
That’s what the Republicans did.
Thanks to their gambit, they shot this issue to national prominence.
And now Tiaheartless will have to explain to grey-haired Baptist women why he voted to impeach Cheney.
Sweet deal!
See that picture of Cheney above?
That’s his “compassionate” expression.
I think it looks like the burrito he ate isn’t going down without a fight!
CapnAmerica,
Do you understand the difference between voting to debate on impeachment (bringing the issue to the floor) and voting for impeachment?
CF2K – Pelosi and Democrats have been punking themselves. I have always been a Democrat, always voted Democrat, and right now, I’m embarrassed for the Democrats in Congress. They can’t get their sh*t together long enough to get anything done, whether it’s defunding the Iraqi War, passing the SCHIP bill, or getting the worst president ever and/or his VP either out of office, or at least hamstrung so that they can cause no more harm to our country!!!!
TDT,
Oh, agreed. They seem to think they’ll put off the voting public if they just grow a pair and start hammering the Repukes on their obstructionism and dishonesty.
However, I do think this vote to bring the impeachment of Cheney to the floor could well come back to bite the Repukegresscritters who voted for it.
That’s all I will say for now.
CF2K,
How will it come back to bite them?
Anyone that takes even the slightest moment in time to understand what took place would see exactly what happened.
“Thanks to their gambit, they shot this issue to national prominence.”
That’s the plan. People may wonder why the Libs are messing with this and not getting us out of Iraq. Good job on the minimum wage, though.
Great job by Congress on passing the Federal Budgets too.
Only 6 weeks late so far.
“People may wonder why the Libs are messing with this and not getting us out of Iraq.”
Uh … fleett … there were more Repukes in on this than Dems. It is the Dem leadership trying to focus on issues.
Ben,
How were more Rupublicans in on this than Democrats?
It was created by a Democrat.
It was released from a Democratic controlled Committee.
The only time the Republicans got in on it was to turn it aroud on the Democrats.
“The majority was formed by 165 Republicans and 86 Democrats.”
Back when I took arithmetic 165 was more than 86. Or does that “GOP balanced budget” math work differently?
More nathan the marine boy inspired spin. Did your “skygod” tell you that it was his/her/its plan?
Ben,
Those were the numbers to bring it to debate.
AFTER a Democrat started it
AFTER the Democrats let it out of committee.
Apophis,
Do you do anything other than grace me with your one line quips?
I think it is the only time I ever see you post.
I should also add:
AFTER the Republicans seen so many Democrats were voting to bring it to debate
This whole grandstanding by both parties is about as stupid as it gets.
In the first place, impeaching an elected official should be the last thing congress looks at. It is not something to be taken lightly. There had better be more than, “He lied to the American people.” Name me one elected official who hasn’t.People who live in glass houses, etc. Kinda like a certain individual caught in a bathroom sting.
The smoking gun better have had some really bad ammo in it.
Second. Don’t we have a war going on? Is impeaching Cheney going to end that any sooner? If you think it will, I got a really great bridge I’ll sell you.
We have one year to turn things around, prior to getting rid of this administration, and impeaching either Bush or Cheney will do absolutely nada to help the situation. In fact, it would turn this country on it’s side with partisanship on steroids.
I can only hope congress ain’t that stupid. Good grief, their ratings are lower than whale s**t. This would put them in the realm of negative numbers, and we really don’t need that. Can this crap, and get to work correcting the problems we got now. Like Americans dying in a stupid war.
“A” Democrat initiated it. “SOME” Domocrats furthered it. 165 Republicans voted for it. That is more than “A” and “SOME”
I should also add:
AFTER the Republicans seen so many Democrats were voting to bring it to debate
Posted by: Nathan | November 07, 2007 at 05:03 PM
There is no debate with you right-wingers………….you are overwhelmed by your dogma to participate in a true debate.
“There is no debate with you right-wingers………….you are overwhelmed by your dogma to participate in a true debate.”
Nathan is right. When was the last time Apophis debated anyone? Sadly Apophis contributes only insults.
I’m glad Kucinich brought this. I want that rat Cheney to know how most Americans feel about him. He is an evil and criminal man.
Heh heh
When my son was younger, he called Cheney “the bad man” Wish I’d had that picture!
Take a look at that face. THAT is the face of a Republican. That is what is inside Republicans.
Well well,
JM is the new “St. Peter” — and all he needs is a “mugshot” to decide who gets into Heaven.
Hey Apophis, you don’t know what the definition of debate truly means. If someone shows you up, you cry foul and start calling names, ie–right wingers, etc. I guess that is what makes a liberal a liberal. No substance!
“Nathan, I am not sure about your assessment… I think this might be a Republican movement to distance themselves from a lot of the Cheney/Bush chicanery of the past 6 years“.Chas
According to a Banyar staff member who call CSPAN during this show, Nathan was just parroting the party line. That was exacting the Minority leader’s thinking, now to me it would have been funny if they had managed to get the VP impeached! Can you just image the scene in the Oval office when Banyar and the President were alone?
Of course I had to also laugh when Pelosi said she that it would take a lot of time that could be used to be productive. I watch CSPAN a lot, what they would not have the time to pass more meaningless Resolutions? “What do you mean we are being a do-nothing Congress? We recognized the women’s basketball team of left-east- middle Lucsonville!”. Rome is burning and they are arguing over whether to roast hot dogs or marshmallows?
A commentator last night made the statement to impeach the vice President would do no good. The VP is nothing more then window dressing, he has no power and has no input into policy decision making. “Commentator meet Dick Cheney, the dark lord of chaos and the fomenter of truly Un-American thinking. Dick Cheney meet Commentator, the mindless minion who has been asleep for the last six years!”.
Well, well, well–looks like there may be a cajone amongst the lot of those Dems after all–
BREAKING: Wexler Will Urge House Judiciary Committee to ‘Schedule Impeachment Hearings Immediately’
Letter Calling for Action Sent to Constituents After Kucinich Resolution to Impeach Cheney is Referred to CommitteeSays ‘Vice President Cheney must answer for his deceptive actions in office’
As reported in full by David Swanson, in the wake of yesterday’s wild ride (and game of chicken) on the House floor concerning the privileged resolution filed by Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH), calling for the Impeachment of Dick Cheney.
The following is from a letter sent to constituents today by Rep. Robert Wexler (D-FL), a member of the House Judiciary Committee, where the matter has been sent again.
Wexler is now calling for the committee “to schedule impeachment hearings immediately and not let this issue languish as it has over the last six months.”
http://www.bradblog.com/?p=5263
It’s so much fun to watch the right wing SQUIRM!
Dance puppetts, DANCE!
Repubs. are now going to rally around Cheney, too funny.
Again Apophis, you truly do not know the meaning of debate. I believe it has been the liberals squirming like the snakes they truly are. Too bad you won’t win in the end.
Keep up the wishful thinking dtc!
I can’t wait to hear the whining when Hillary is elected next year.
Oh, blog postings really are NOT debate. What an idiot you are dtc.
You are the one who brought up debate you fat ass.
fat ass?
now who is throwing out (inacurate) insults?
typical repuke strategy
Wow that all ya got dtc?
Me and you will have to dance some time.
I’ll only make ya cry a little.
Apophis, did you hear what happened in Utah yesterday? School vouchers won! Won’t be long until it is here. Pack your bags, your union is useless.
Yeah dtc…
I actually HAVE a kid in school.
And vouchers to send him to some religious private school?
Nah no thanks.
Well wouldn’t you know it, another thread turns to shit, and good ole JR/JM shows up to take his turn sniffing.
Mind you, this is no longer a blog to share opinions, ideas, and opposing views.
It’s just a mud pile and the regular and only one around are the same old pigs.
And he is too stupid to even look back at his insane posts. No logic. No thought. No opinions. Just slinging mud at anyone who will play.
Ignorance truly is bliss, ain’t it JR?
What do you know?
It is JR over here causing trouble or adding to it.
We all know that Apophis is a trouble maker.
The only posts Apophis made here were personal attacks and added nothing to the discussion.
Here is JR to Apophis rescue!
JR, when are you going to start living up to your own expectations for people around here?
There are other, better private schools. Why send him to a government indoctrination center with the chance of being taught by a communist like Apophis? No thanks.
I don’t like schools that treat kids only on a bottom line basis there dtc.
Nathan I told you to climb off. dtc had no posts of relevance here. I looked. He only showed up to attack Apophis. Just like Pat only showed up because she stalks me.
Well JR/JM, I just came in to see what that gawd awful smell was.Sure enough – and then there was you!
JR, you are right, I only came to get the fat ass Apophis, excuse me, fat mouth Apophis. Mouth, Ass, same thing in his case.
Look at test results before writing off the private schools. Much better education.
We all know that Apophis is a trouble maker.
Uh no I don’t know that. I just got back.
I know Apophis does well in point counter point with heartlander. Beyond that I don’t know him much.
J R, You MUST remember it isn’t OK for your to disagree or find fault or criticize! IOKIYAR! I know you already knew that!
And YOU dtc are a narrow minded union basher.
Whoa look at the mouth on Pat and dtc there Nathan!
Better get on to them!
I know I know linda.
Hey Nathan you left our discussion on torture unfinished.
Oh and Apophis? DON’T follow Nathan around with that “marine boy” stuff. It demeans him and you.
Hey JR, I am for you and your kids education. I am not a union basher just an Apophis basher. I am on your side, buddy.
Come off it Linda!!!
Scan for J R on the thread. I’ll buy you a steak dinner if you can find one post of his with a real honest to goodness OPINION or contribution to a progressing thread.
Bashing Bush does NOT count.
Uh huh,
I’d have to get to know ya better dtc.
Teachers have a hard and largely thankless job. They don’t deserve to get bagged on.
Just today I answered an email from my kids teacher. You’d have thought I’d awarded her the Nobel prize she was so happy. Parental interest not something she seems familiar with.
How about the torture thread just last night there Pat?
BOY was that revealing about you. You did just about everything except answer a direct question.
I e-mail my kids teachers all the time. They do a great job and I agree mostly thankless. However, in goverment schools you will have communists like Apophis. I haven’t seen any bad apples in private schools.
Ya know dtc?
When I see a poster tossing the word “communist” around, I get the image of a reactionary, dull, nut.
How would you describe YOUR politics?
Look at today’s threads bozo.
And your stay on torture was apparently only directed at one poster, whom you tried to corner like a dog. You lost Kansas to stalk and beat up.
I answered any questions addressed to me.
Pat,
Today he reminded all of us to look for the space craft re-entering (is that a word? I’m sure J R said it better than I am!) around noonish. I wasn’t aware and thought that was a GREAT reminder. Other than that ONE which you said couldn’t be found I’ve found he has interesting, thoughtful, compassionate thoughts on many of today’s issues.
No pat ya didn’t so I’ll go way off topic for this thread (too late) and ask it here.
How sure would you have to be of a suspects guilt before your administered, NOT ORDERED, torture?
Yeah the shuttle didn’t put on much a show here locally.
I thought it a nice distraction from the other stuff on the open.
Don’t worry about Pat linda.
I’m her reason for posting.
I try REAL hard to be worthy of such love….
medium rare
And your stay on torture was apparently only directed at one poster
That would be Nathan. Whom I was trying to get to answer the same question I put to you.
Yup Pat owes ya a steak linda.
DON’T welch Pat.
I’ll make ya famous!
My politics are conservative. I would vote for a Dumocrat if they had the correct answers. That is probably a contradiction in terms. How about yourself?
I’ll have to put some old stuff up for the newbies sometimes.
I didn’t ALWAYS posts in bites like this.
It’s just when you’ve done every issue 3 dozen times, eventually it’s pretty much said.
Heh heh
I posted an older bit on the war the other day that floored MAX.
Oh you’d call me a communist dtc.
I prefer to think of myself as a former conservative turned social democrat.
I’d vote for anyone who had the right answers. Is someone like that running? Aren’t ALL the candidates bought and paid for? The only thing left for us to vote for are the judges the one we elect will appoint. I, personally, can’t agree with what the Republican Party has become. Therefore, I will carefully consider the kinds of judges that may be appointed and probably vote for Democratic philosophies and policies.
So being a conservative you would be pro choice then dtc?
O.K. Linda, you about made me puke with that last line about, “interesting, thoughtful, compassionate thoughts”. And I almost just logged off in disgust, but I will give JM/JR the benefit of doubt on the two posts he made about the Space Shuttle.
JR/JM was here literally all day long and late last night. It must be on welfare because I have to work and cannot log so frequently.
But, please give me time to figure out how to pay up yet allow both of us to remain incognito, to protect us.
I’m thinking I could send you something via Phil Brownlee, orperhaps you could name the localeating establishment and I send something there in your NIC’s name?
(I really hate to bother the paper with all the other crybabies emailing them.)
I am coming to really hate the 2 party system linda.
It is two sides of a coin. A mutual death embrace.
I started out a Republican. But I learned that those who “make it” only do so by “playing the game”
I’m not much for games.
Call me the warm hot water that wants to ease the icy cold cruelty of conservativism as it has come to be.
See Pat?
That’s where you’re wrong.
I confessed to the only two posts I did as JM.
I posted yesterday only a few times during the day and only was on for an hour or so last night.
I don’t play with identities. Sometime, I’ll tell you why.
JR,
I answered your question on torture and you basically reposted exactly what you did before it.
When you have something new for me to address I will.
It’s OK Pat. You admitted your error. I respect posters who can be wrong and admit it. We all are wrong or in error sometimes, ya know! Aren’t we all people?
J R, me too! Big business owns them all. America’s soul has been sold out. I would love to see a third party candidate the majority ALL of us could get behind!
Boy, my fingers and tired mind sure messed up that last post.
…a third party candidate the majority of us could get behind!
Good night all.
I’ll make ya famous!
Posted by: J R |
Please JM/JR, you do know me. I don’t give a rats ass what you post about me. I am relentless and single-minded in my approach.
I post from across the nation, indeed the world. I have many heads, as the serpent Medusa.
While your stated mission was to save the world, mine is to ensure you fulfill that self-stated prophecy, are banned, or your medium gone.
No new hits from you that thread Nathan…
Good on you owning up and paying up Pat.
Linda, she’s one sweet lady.
The FIRST day I was back I defended….wait for it….Hank Price from what I saw as an unfair attack.
Lots of history you should know here before you pronounce judgements on me there Pat.
Let me make sure I understand Pat.
Your mission here is to ruin me or kill the blog?
JR,
One more time, just for you.
I answered your question. You didn’t respond to anything I said and reposted the same question again, after calling me evasive again.
When you have something new to add, I will respond.
I’ll have to bookmark that one Pat.
Just in case it disappears.
I figured you for distubing from last nights torture rif.
On my way to that thread now Nathan.
“I post from across the nation, indeed the world. I have many heads, as the serpent Medusa.”
OMG!
You know who that exactly sounds like?
Oh, YEAH.
I’ve been wondering for some time now if Pat Herron wasn’t the latest incarnation of you . . . know . . . who . . .
Ya know JM?
I had sorta that suspicion all along…
That last post of yours “Pat”
Strikes me you are “calling me out”.
As someone else? said…
Bring a lunch.
But you beat it in to him even AFTER he apologized, was banned, and the editors let him return.
You make him [Kansas] out to be an ogre, when he was a lamb. And a military vet at that.
You sir, are an ass.
Posted by: Pat Herron | November 06, 2007 at 09:27 PM
Wow!
You seem to have an intimate knowledge of Kansas, and get up on your hindlegs to defend him when nobody else really does.
Who else would care so much . . . except Kansas himself.
Does this mean we are going to see 50 posts attacking Pat for every one post he makes?
Sigh….
Hey Nathan?
Did I or JM THREATEN “Pat” as Pat just did me and this blog?
I tried to be nice to….”Pat”.
Does this mean we are going to see 50 posts attacking Pat for every one post he makes?
Not from me Nathan.
Pat would have to get real busy.
So FAR “Pat” mostly posts to attack me. If that changes….
I am not thinking that is Capn.
If that is Capn, he can tell me when he first met me and my son.
J R,
The 11:31 PM post is using a redirect for the Typekey id, and is almost certainly not Capn’s. The same trick was used on the false and DELETED posts on the ‘meltdown’ thread a few nights ago.
Put the mouse pointer on the nic.
And it’s being used on other threads here tonite.
It’s the same old pathetic, time-wasting, immature story…
“I post from across the nation, indeed the world. I have many heads, as the serpent Medusa.”– Pat Herron –=========================An admission that P H is a many nic’d poster, and could be anybody at any given time. Maybe even he who went away?
Chas., that is not what I posted. Go back and read what was posted, again.
P H — Sorry, but that is a direct quote from your post… Cut and paste… the entire quote of that paragraph… You want to double check that??
Oh, and besides, the many headed serpent of mythology is the Hydra, not the Medusa!! LOL
I can see from the latest posts why this country is so screwed up. Absolutly nothing of substance, and everything in the gradeschool yard.
I think I’ll find me a blog that is inhabited by adults who like adult conversations. Here it’s the samo-samo everyday. Morons bi**h-slapping each other. Ridiculous!