And guess what? It’s all about how chemicals don’t really hurt us.

Mercury, lead, asbestos, global warming, arsenic . . . Nothing to worry about, folks. Just alarmist scientists.

Whew . . . I’m so relived now. Because Catherine in a little town in Kansas knows much, much better than peer-reviewed science.

And you are correct: Hillary may correct that problem, at least better than this administration is doing.

Do you get paid to spam the WEBlog with links?

Or do you do it for free?

http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2007/08/exclusive-us-st.html

http://www.washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070808/NATION/108080088/1001

http://washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070809/NATION/108090085/1001

http://service.spiegel.de/cache/international/spiegel/0,1518,358223,00.html

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/07/05/nterror405.xml

http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2007/07/fbi-iraqis-bein.html

http://www.nysun.com/article/46762

A rather cowardly admission, but so be it.

As far as my “girlfriend” post, I must admit I don’t get it. Anyone could have sent it, I admit that. I admit that I was wrong to assume that the person even knew you. It could obviously have been anyone, but it did happen, and it happened at the same time that I made my original “hunch” about you public.And then you disappeared.

Lies?

I am not:

QueerA ScabA ChickenhawkMedically discharged.

You repeat those lies all the time.

You have been “busted” on those lies.

I suggest that you remain true to the spirit in which you used to “sign off” on your strange emails:

“From the tips of your fingers…..to the depths of a distant soul…..words touch hearts

type carefullyJ

Yup Econ Paul, It’s likely I emailed you a time or two. I do that when things get hot here. I prefer to keep the personal stuff from cluttering up the blog. On one occasion LONG before you…graced us, a well known poster accused me of abusing drugs. I took it email back channel with him. Unfortunately, it still had to get fought out here. He was wrong and paid a heavy price. But he DID acknowsledge that he was wrong. There have been a few other instances where I tried to settle stuff back channel.

So yeah, it’s possible I emailed you. If you have something I sent post it here. I think I may have emailed you that I would drive you from this forum. That IS my intention. You are an irredemable liar as you have often shown.

You SEEM to think this is about your accusation that I am “a drunk”. It isn’t. And incidentally, I think you are projecting. Anyone measuring your words and mine here would note that yours are heavier on the caps and punctuation than mine. This is particularly true in the debate where you blew up and crossed the line.

And THAT is what this is about.

I’m hard on you Econ Paul and I make no apologies for it. You miss no opportunity to whine about it. We can go toe to toe and call each other whatever we wish. I could not care less what you think of me and I’m sure you feel the same.

But YOU involved other people. You say you have an email from someone else. You have variously described that email as defending me and threatening you. You claim it is a woman sending it. But as with the email itself you’ve no proof. Your ORIGINAL lie was that it was from a girlfriend of mine. That’s a “girlfriend” I don’t have for those still keeping score.

You do not get to involve other people in your fight with me.

By implication, you suggest that someone who knows me and you and this forum would contact you in defense of me. I surely didn’t suggest that. I can handle you on my own. And you don’t have the email in question.

Occams razor Paul. Are you familiar with it? “The most obvious answer is usually the right one” Well to the blog you routinely lie to, what is the most likely answer here? Did you blow up in the middle of a debate where you were clearly highly emotional and pull something out of your ass to throw at me? Or…Are we all to believe the spinning, evolving, desperate alternative you construct and have no evidence for?

Again Paul, I make no secret, I don’t want you here. You’re a liar and you will do anything to sell your lies. What I wouldn’t, have not, and would never do is to post lies on you and attribute them to a third party with no proof.

I think you are done here. That is up to the other posters. I will continue to bust you whenever you post lies. You are free and invited to try and do the same.

JBIRDKS@webtv.net

He first emailed me on 7 October 2006 at 1:34 AM.His second email was also on 7 October 2006 at 2 AM.

As with all of his emails, they were threatening, rude and not worth keeping.

The vast majority were deleted, as was the email from his friend whom I thought was his girlfriend.

JR seems to be afraid to admit that he has ever sent me an email.

Perhaps he forgot what he said, or perhaps he forgot, for sure, if he even did it? He flies into rages that would probably rather forget, I am sure.

Now, this could have all been orchastrated by someone else, trying to provoke a fight between myself and JR.

I have my doubts.

JR, do you deny that you have ever emailed me?

If you scroll through the above, you can see a desperate man caught in a lie and asking me, his fellow bloggers and all our readers for…..

what are the words?

“A willing suspension of disbelief..”

Ya got me Econ. More than 6 months ago, I got someone to email you to ask you to be nice to me because I have an alcohol problem. You opened the email even though it had a virus. Given such damning information on me, you threw it away. I then purposely disappeared for 7 months. Then I came back and set my evil scheme into motion.

I’m reminded of the cop that caught Larry Craig. “Embarassing. Embarassing.”

Bye Paul.

Wade? We are sorry you did not enjoy your blogging experience. We know you have a choice in blogging and hope you will consider us again in the future.

I’m sorry you walked into a train wreck Wade. By way of explanation, here is the kill shot on Econ. He loaded the gun and pointed it at his head. I just pissed him off into pulling the trigger!: )

The subject is Rush Paul. If you wanna make it me and you I will HAPPILY go there.

I only bring in your past to explain your present. You’ll say anything. You’ll do anything. All for your rotten agenda that is no bigger than youw own wallet.

WHY DID HE EDIT THE TRANSCRIPT???

Posted by: J R | October 06, 2007 at 11:05 PM

Econ101! Just ignore JR, most everybody else does. He/She/It isn’t worth debating about anything.

Posted by: Joe Williams | October 06, 2007 at 11:05 PM

agreed

He is a drunk

His girlfriend pretty much admitted it when she attacked me once, by email.

Posted by: Econ101 | October 06, 2007 at 11:07 PM

Oh NOW you are in trouble Paul.

Produce that email. Or retract your lie.

Joe? Stay outta this.

Posted by: J R | October 06, 2007 at 11:09 PM

I’ll even let Joe be the moderator. Maybe he will learn something.

Produce the email Paul. You are lying through your teeth.

I’m just on pins and needles as to the jeenious contributions he could have submitted.

World peace was within our grasp if only we hadn’t run off WADE (sob!)

This should be a place where honorable people can disagree.

JR and others have taken it upon themselves to bully people that they disagree with and try to get them to leave.

The net result, when we fight back, is that newcommers, and the “nerds” and “policy wonks” that really want to discuss issues, throw their hands in the air and say “a pox on both your houses.”

I am very tired of JR’s garbage.

I think the Eagle should police this site and boot people who make a habit of making insults.

I also think we should have a password system to avoid trolls and fake posts.

However, since the Eagle won’t police this site, I found it necessary to fight fire with fire.

But what am I really fighting for?

The the “right” to post, without personal attacks and abuse, of course.

And I am willing to abide by a truce that says we all agree not to make personal attacks.

JR is not willing to agree to that truce.

I know of no other way to clean up this Blog.

JR’s idea of “cleaning up the Blog” is to run off everyone he doesnt agree with. He can not handle serious debate.—–By the way, JR, the question(s) stand:

Have you EVER sent me an email?

Have you EVER had anyone else send me an email?

popup! (OO) JM

Like his words meaning anything on this Blog…

yawn…

That’s the sound of JR running, to save the world, or at least to save his own a*s.

“These Blogladytes only reason for existence is to cause the misery of others.

“Of course, the moment some one takes them to task and bests them, they go into their mega whine mode.

“If the Libs can’t personally attack another blogger several times during the day, they feel they haven’t filled their quota of mean spirited rhetoric quota.

“Drug induced mania is what I call it. They have no minds, just a set of scrambled nerves that constantly misfire.”

Posted by: Kansas | October 07, 2007 at 10:21 PM

“Kansas”

Kansas is also known as the ECP (Eric Cartman Poster) on this blog. He has no credibility here.

“I will let it rest as soon as I get an answer from JR:

“JR”Have you ever sent me any emails, or have you ever had anyone else send me any emails?

“Simple question JR.

“If you don’t answer, I will assume that the answer is:

“YES!”

Posted by: Econ101 | October 07, 2007 at 10:26 PM

Only problem, we haven’t heard from the conservatives.

Have Paul and his group, acknowlege what they do??? Most likely not.

Lying, is a sin. Please explain to us, how it is now okay. Thanks.

I will let it rest as soon as I get an answer from JR:

JRHave you ever sent me any emails, or have you ever had anyone else send me any emails?

Simple question JR.

If you don’t answer, I will assume that the answer is:

YES!

These Blogladytes only reason for existence is to cause the misery of others.

Of course, the moment some one takes them to task and bests them, they go into their mega whine mode.

If the Libs can’t personally attack another blogger several times during the day, they feel they haven’t filled their quota of mean spirited rhetoric quota.

Drug induced mania is what I call it. They have no minds, just a set of scrambled nerves that constantly misfire.

When I stood up and argued against a strike, the majority of my Union voted with me.

The strike vote failed.

The radicals were the ones that attacked me.

Radicals that think like YOU, unfortunately.

The term would also apply to someone eligible to join a union, who refused to join, and crosses a picket line. — or to a Union member who crosses such a line.

In any event, with no offense intended towards those who did feel they had to support their families, and go to work, crossing the line —-

I never did!

I went on strike once.

The second time a strike vote came up, I told my Union they were nuts to strike again, and my union members attacked me.

I have posted on this Blog, repeatedly, that there are millions of honorable union members.

There are also thousands of Union bosses who have gone to jail for corrupt activity, like stealing from their members.

JR gets mad at me for pointing out Union corruption.

That is the bottom line here.

JR calls me “scab” all the time.

The definition of “scab” is someone who crosses the picket line who should support the strike.

(It does not really apply to management and non-union members)

In any event, I have never crossed ANY picket line. I might, in the future. I have made no promises.

However, so far, the term “scab” does not apply to me.

JR KNOWS this, and lies anyway.

So, I make an educated guess, based on JR’s behavior, AND an email supporting my suspicions, and I am wrong.

But JR can do whatever he wants?

Come on libs, try to verbalize, in writing here, the “rules” on this Blog, as you think they exist, would you?

Or do the rules apply to JR and to other liberals.

Does JR have any responsibility?

Is it OK for JR to call me:

Queer?A chickenhawk?Medically discharged (when proven wrong on “chickenhawk”)

Well, is it ok? How about scolding your comrad.

JR HAS sent threatening emails, and he does Not have the courage or honesty to admit it.

If had not, I think he would have posted his denial, by now, don’t you?

I have had dozens of emails, uninvited, related to this Blog. I have assumed that most were from JR.

Maybe I was wrong to make such an assumption, but JR seems unwilling to state, publicly, that he has NEVER sent me any emails.

From your posts on this blog, you do not seem to understand the importance of NOT forming opinions based on wild guesses, and anonymous sources.

And you do not seem to believe in your own personal responsibilities.

Posted by econ, concerning his dreaded e-mail.

Kinda like the missing 18 minutes of the nixon tape, or the deleted sections of rushvalium’s diatribe?

And the neo-cons say substance matters.