What would make a “sign” a “sign”, if said “sign” did not predict anything. The above is my nomination for the _dumbest_ thing you have ever posted – which is no small feat given the huge number of candidates.

JEREMIAH 8:8

Posted by: Horst Wessell | July 26, 2007 at 12:19 AM

I think the liberal equivalent is to offer a 50 million dollar reward to whomever has the courage and fortitude to go after Osama.

Hypocrite Parkay is thy name!

You are not opposed to IVF as long as all fertilized embryos are implated? That would be like saying you are not opposed to abortion as long as no fetus are killed.

ANY time IVF is done, dozens of eggs are fertilized, many are implanted with the express knowledge that they will not successfully implant and will ‘die’ and the rest are frozen or destroyed. This always happens, exactly like every time there is an abortion, a fetus dies.

If you truely believe a fertilized egg is a living being there is no way you could EVER support IVF, regardless if all the orphans are adopted or not!

“Data is lacking to assure safe usage” There was enough data for the FDA, AMA, and many other professional medical organizations to issue professional statement based on many studies that it is indeed safe. So much so that the FDA approved it for OTC use in those over 18 and with a prescription for those under that age.

I didnt offer any interpretation of those texts.. only commentary on the interpreters….

And secondly, anhy interpretation I might offer is just that… my interpretation… no more superior or inferior to any other, especially since we can never know the “right” one…

Genisus 1:1 Says in the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. YOU CAN ONLY CREATE ONE TIME bozo. So it was all done in howEVER long it took HIM to do it.

It wasn’t until verse 2 that the shit hit the fan. It says the earth was (became=Tohu bohu) without form and void and everything HE created got DARK!

Some bad stuff happened man between what God created in the beginning, and verse 2. Could be eons to time. Bazillion years!

But there could have been dinasours, glaciers, global cooling, global warming, all kinds of bad stuff man.

Maybe this is when the angel Lucifer took his trip? Who knows?

But the original paradise could have had man, monkeys, apes, or whatEVER. All in verse one.

So sorry charlie, there COULD HAVE BEEN belly buttons in the original creation by the great wizard God.

A serious question. You wrote earlier that conservatives – wait, I gotta scroll back and get your words correctly: cons “who loathe the 14th amendment.”

I’m a conservative. I do not loathe the 14th amendment; on the contrary. Further, I know few conservatives who “loathe” the 14th amendment.

So – I guess I wonder just how you conclude that?

Our final analysis has determined therfore that neither had belly button rings.

Sad times. Some will die, some will screw each other, and some will hate trolls.

Many NIC’s will rise and deceive many.

And lots’ more stuff which could be considered signs and seasons.

But none of you will know the hour – unless you are ME or the old man.

SO chill out, all this will pass, but those of you who are righteous will move on to the WEBLOG eternal.

Matthew 25

Nathan opens with a bold post on discussion of the issues, WE BLOG’s one-sided approach, and the many real value questions voters should be concerned with. He is challenged all day long not on the relevance of his initial post (and significant), but on biblical interpretations mostly by bible expert Chas, and margerines king Parkay.

Distracted by those possing an afront to his christian views, Nathan ends the night have a day long dissertation of the bible on a religious biblical note.

Writerdog, a troll no doubt, posts one significant post on the republican party getting a check up from the neck up, and disappears. Affliation with the WEBLOG staff is a presumption on this poster.

Triple XXX, the movie genre buff, starts the daily ‘Wow Is Me, the trolls are here dialogue’, which captures Chas and Captain America’s ears.

Writers of substance Tracy, Kev post some real pieces related to the national level politic’s of the party line.

Steven Davis posts to Nathan supporting the WEBLOG’s one sided reporting, but challenges Nathan to do their work for them. Stephen later digresses, feeling the need to post the standards of conduct for the WEBLOG, in the world according to him and the liberal regulars of the blog. We predict these postulates will become important food for future postings, for those who are concerned with the proliferating numbers of non-conforming posters on the blogs. There must be approved standards of conduct for free speech on these pages.

Most of the rest of the day was centered on the testimony from various preachers, religious EXPERTS, and biblical researchers, about the writings and life of a one Jesus, who died some 2,000+ years ago. THe news desk could come to no conclusion on the righteousness of any of the participants in this debate. Although one has to wonder if the man Jesus, is laughing his ass off at the various opinions, and name-calling expressed by these writers. Some of them are called “liars” in the thread.

In conclusion, this reporter CAN say with certainty, that this WEBLOG is not discussing the candidates for office, the problems facing this nation, nor the opportunities for improvement to the lot in life for Americans.

And as born again believers, are we not indwelt by the Holy Spirit to guide us? Since I assume you aren’t, or we wouldn’t be having this discussion, the answer is yes.

Thanks for jumping on my case for asking a question. And for your in depth knowledge of Libertarians.

Here is a little scoop for you. Libertarians are a ‘live and let live’ kind of people. We don’t condone/seek/endorse/promote the use of force to make others conform to what we think is the right path. It does not preclude us from having opinions or even being judgmental about how other people are living/acting.

Good nite, good luck, and god bless, who/whatever you conceive of God to be…

That statement doesn’t in and of it’s self preclude that there could very well be signs.

None of the verse you have cited so far preclude the possibility of signs.

Yet you make a definitive claim that Jesus says there will be no signs.

I have yet to see a verse that says that.

What outlander said is what I have been trying to say for several threads now.

I Thessalonians 5:4 “For you yourselves know full well that the day of the Lord will come just like a thief in the night.==================

That is a paraphrase of the passage in Matthew I cited above… according to my Greek New Testament source book…