<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dreamliner looks worthy of the name</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/07/dreamliner-look/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/07/dreamliner-look/</link>
	<description>The Wichita Eagle Editorial Department Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 01:37:40 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: cosmos</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/07/dreamliner-look/#comment-220752</link>
		<dc:creator>cosmos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 19:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/07/dreamliner-look/#comment-220752</guid>
		<description>The 787 has a 20% reduction in fuel consumption.  Some of the technology used is described here,

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.greencarcongress.com/2007/07/boeing-rolls-ou.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.greencarcongress.com/2007/07/boeing-rolls-ou.html&lt;/a&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 787 has a 20% reduction in fuel consumption.  Some of the technology used is described here,</p>
<p><a href="http://www.greencarcongress.com/2007/07/boeing-rolls-ou.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.greencarcongress.com/2007/07/boeing-rolls-ou.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/07/dreamliner-look/#comment-220751</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 19:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/07/dreamliner-look/#comment-220751</guid>
		<description>Gus, everything you said about the dreamliner is a lie.  Secondly, the 380 is a disaster waiting to happen.  It will only take one of them going down to make the worst air catastrophe in aviation history.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gus, everything you said about the dreamliner is a lie.  Secondly, the 380 is a disaster waiting to happen.  It will only take one of them going down to make the worst air catastrophe in aviation history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: littlejohn</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/07/dreamliner-look/#comment-220750</link>
		<dc:creator>littlejohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 18:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/07/dreamliner-look/#comment-220750</guid>
		<description>T&quot;hat Engineering masterpiece is using technology that Airbus already has on the A380.&quot;

The A380 is all composite? or even a composite fuselage?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>T&#8221;hat Engineering masterpiece is using technology that Airbus already has on the A380.&#8221;</p>
<p>The A380 is all composite? or even a composite fuselage?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ProudMan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/07/dreamliner-look/#comment-220749</link>
		<dc:creator>ProudMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 18:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/07/dreamliner-look/#comment-220749</guid>
		<description>Re-affirmed the Air Capitol status?  Is that why the plane rolled out in Washington?

Hint for newspaper editors: Wichita is not in Washington.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re-affirmed the Air Capitol status?  Is that why the plane rolled out in Washington?</p>
<p>Hint for newspaper editors: Wichita is not in Washington.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gus</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/07/dreamliner-look/#comment-220748</link>
		<dc:creator>Gus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 04:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/07/dreamliner-look/#comment-220748</guid>
		<description>That Engineering masterpiece is using technology that Airbus already has on the A380.  The Dreamliner is 4 months behind schedule and 20% over weight.  The engines are underpowered and the plane won&#039;t meet projected targets but you won&#039;t hear that from Boeing.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That Engineering masterpiece is using technology that Airbus already has on the A380.  The Dreamliner is 4 months behind schedule and 20% over weight.  The engines are underpowered and the plane won&#8217;t meet projected targets but you won&#8217;t hear that from Boeing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MLH</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/07/dreamliner-look/#comment-220747</link>
		<dc:creator>MLH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 00:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/07/dreamliner-look/#comment-220747</guid>
		<description>This new jetliner is an engineering masterpiece. Too bad the airlines will get ahold of it and fill it with 17 inches wide seats 31 inches apart. Then the airlines will operate it with 4 hour ground holds. Once in the air, the airlines will sell $5 Lunchable knock-offs just hours before their expiration dates. Then on the ground, luggage will be diverted to where-ever. Too bad all the expertise at Boeing can&#039;t be unleashed to fixed the rest of the system.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This new jetliner is an engineering masterpiece. Too bad the airlines will get ahold of it and fill it with 17 inches wide seats 31 inches apart. Then the airlines will operate it with 4 hour ground holds. Once in the air, the airlines will sell $5 Lunchable knock-offs just hours before their expiration dates. Then on the ground, luggage will be diverted to where-ever. Too bad all the expertise at Boeing can&#8217;t be unleashed to fixed the rest of the system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Republican</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/07/dreamliner-look/#comment-220746</link>
		<dc:creator>Republican</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 19:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/07/dreamliner-look/#comment-220746</guid>
		<description>Dreamliner looks spiff.  Free test ride please! :D
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dreamliner looks spiff.  Free test ride please! :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fleettwood</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/07/dreamliner-look/#comment-220745</link>
		<dc:creator>fleettwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 15:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/07/dreamliner-look/#comment-220745</guid>
		<description>&quot;Typical procedure for new plane rollout. Nothing new there.&quot;

A friend of mine at Beech said the same thing.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Typical procedure for new plane rollout. Nothing new there.&#8221;</p>
<p>A friend of mine at Beech said the same thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: littlejohn</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/07/dreamliner-look/#comment-220744</link>
		<dc:creator>littlejohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 15:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/07/dreamliner-look/#comment-220744</guid>
		<description>Not that it matters much, but I heard that there was nothing in the inside of the plane. They wanted to get this thing rolled out on 7/8/7.

Posted by: fleettwood &#124; July 10, 2007 at 09:18 AM

Typical procedure for new plane rollout. Nothing new there.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not that it matters much, but I heard that there was nothing in the inside of the plane. They wanted to get this thing rolled out on 7/8/7.</p>
<p>Posted by: fleettwood | July 10, 2007 at 09:18 AM</p>
<p>Typical procedure for new plane rollout. Nothing new there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fleettwood</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/07/dreamliner-look/#comment-220743</link>
		<dc:creator>fleettwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 15:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/07/dreamliner-look/#comment-220743</guid>
		<description>Not that it matters much, but I heard that there was nothing in the inside of the plane.  They wanted to get this thing rolled out on 7/8/7.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not that it matters much, but I heard that there was nothing in the inside of the plane.  They wanted to get this thing rolled out on 7/8/7.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kev</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/07/dreamliner-look/#comment-220742</link>
		<dc:creator>Kev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 11:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/07/dreamliner-look/#comment-220742</guid>
		<description>I think we can now say &quot;stick it&quot; to Airbus. They are toast and Boeing is back!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we can now say &#8220;stick it&#8221; to Airbus. They are toast and Boeing is back!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
