Here are the details, as reported by Bartcop:

In the winter of 1971 George W. Bush was dating a woman named Robin Lowman (now Robin Garner). Miss Lowman became pregnant by Smirk and he arranged for her to have an abortion – which in the great state of Texas in 1971 was very illegal! Not to mention that George W. is running as a pro-life candidate for the presidency.The unnamed source of this story, was a friend of Robin Lowman’s and the girlfriend of the man who arranged the abortion. His name is Robert Carl Chandler. Chandler is a Bush friend and supporter from way back and he made the arrangements for Miss Lowman’s abortion at the Twelve Oaks Hospital in Houston, TX (now the Bayou City Medical Center). The source overheard the call by Mr. Chandler to arrange the abortion and the source visited Robin Lowman at the Twelve Oaks Hospital after the procedure.

The source meanwhile, is afraid of coming forward, saying that she was threatened by Chandler and another Bush friend and supporter named Jim Bath. Bath has longstanding intelligence connections, and played a role in the BCCI scandal. Robin Lowman (now Garner) is married to Jerry Lee Garner who is an FBI agent.

So, that’s the story: an illegal back room abortion arranged by the Republican party Presidential candidate who is running on a pro-life ticket.

The CNN Coverup

Amazingly, CNN scrubbed its own story!!!!

This has all the markings of a cover-up by CNN – just like the cover-ups of Bush’s many other scandals, from going AWOL, to using illegal drugs, to corruption in Texas government, to lying under oath.

Here is the original transcript that was published by CNN, but has now been scrubbed.

NOVAK: Mr. Flynt, never let it be said that we censor any of our guests here on CROSSFIRE, and you said you wanted to talk about the election. Tell me what you wanted to say.

FLYNT: Well, during the impeachment debacle, we did an investigation which resulted in the resignation of Bob Livingston and others and we have continued this investigation and for eight months we’ve been looking into George W. Bush’s background. And we’ve found out in the early 1970s he was involved in an abortion in Texas, and I just think that it’s sad that the mainstream media, who’s aware of this story, won’t ask him that question when they were able to ask him the drug question without any proof at all, and we’ve got all kinds of proof on this issue.

NOVAK: Well, you’re…

FLYNT: You know, the guy admitted he was a drunk for 20 years, and if the abortion issue is true then that puts him lower on the morality scale than Bill Clinton.

NOVAK: Mr. Flynt, you said if it’s true and you have no proof of that. I gather you are a very strong…

FLYNT: The hell we don’t have proof.

That’s okay. We don;t need to agree on everything. We disagree here. No personal problem here.

We often agree more than disagree. On this one, I don’t think we’re gonna find agreement.

a cross is a simple cross. A crucifix is a cross with the body of christ hanging on it.

And again, it was not put up by radical christians trying to impose christianity. That was your point about the ACLU> It was a war memorial. Regardless of the Iwo jima memorial, there are crosses on government property. Probably they should be removed, huh? In this instance, in my opinion, the ACLU should have just said no. IT was a war memorial. The ACLU and those who see “radical” christians everywhere should take heed to same advice given to christians that see ‘the devil” and “demons” and hate from everycorner. Take a deep breath, have a little common sense.

What’s the difference between a Christian cross and a crucifix?

The most prominent statue at Arlington is the Iwo Jima memorial, not a giant crucifix that can be seen three miles away.

And there’s a big difference between making a cross the giant centerpiece in a government monument, and putting crosses on the headstones of fallen heroes.

I wonder if there are any Jews or atheists or pagans or Muslims buried there, at the foot of that giant cross…

“After more than 50 years overlooking the city of San Diego, the cross, erected as part of veteran’s war memorial”

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A21598-2005Mar9.html

Same as all the crosses at arlington natinal cemetary, etc.

Third, your post was about the aclu protecting against radical christians. I beleive this was a war memorial, not a movement by radical christiansfinally, I wouldn;t care if was a giant menorah, or crescent moon and starts, it was a WAR MEMORIAL.

Yeah,it was found to be in violation. So it should be removed. Agreed. comply with the law. BUT IT was a ware memorial. Some weasily judge, or judges, need to stand upsometimes and apply some common sense. It was a WAR memorial.

Since when is a giant crucifix on government property a “war memorial?” Was it a memorial to the Crusades, perhaps?

What if the symbol had been a giant menorah? A giant crescent-moon-and-star? What if the good upstanding Christian citizens of San Diego thought it the moon/star was a symbol if international terrorism?

The case you’re referring to clearly looks like “government establishment.” It gave preference to one religion over others, and was found to be in violation of California’s constitution.

It’s no surprise the ACLU has to spend more time defending the First Amendment _against_ religious radicals”

doesn;t meet the smell test on this case. It wasn;t about religious radicals, it was a war memorial. standing for 50 years.

http://www.aclu.org/religion/govtfunding/16195prs20021022.html

I kind of miss it.

I’m going to let out with the Muslim call to prayer:

“A lah allahu Akaabar!”

Boy, that’s gonna wake up all those hung-over dead-heads!

Hindu? Buddhist? Wiccan? Islamic? Native American?

Which prayers should be sponsored by our school tax dollars?

Posted by: Tom | July 10, 2007 at 10:23 PM

Yeah I did! It took up almost a whole Web page! Wow! Zounds!

Now,let’s see all the ACLU actions against Christians, Nativity scenes, prayer in school, etc.

What? No list? I’m shocked!

(pssst, ACLU bashers: You should read the documents listed at Rage’s link)

Sentate votes to DEFUND cheneyGonzalez is on the hot seat againMeiers has to testify DESPITE pissypants claiming EPIraq War failing

but

but

wait for it…

Chertoff has a “gut feeling” some boogie man might attack us this summer…

way to go chimpy … bring out the terror card again, but this time people are on to your corruption

Thanks for the list!

This of course is patenty false. And pretty damn stupid to boot.

http://www.aclufightsforchristians.com/

Which one?”

All of them

Posted by: WSClark | July 10, 2007 at 04:44 PM

Got no problem with that. Whatever made you think I did? And i think I can follow the COnstitution, not your exhortations.