But as for this statement….

“The Pentagon has NEVER stated the Saddam was NOT financing terrorists.”

Despite the fact that it is a double negative, therefore not provable, and it is incorrect.

The Pentagon stated without qualification that Hussein had no operational connection with terrorism.

That would mean training or financing.

But nice try anyway.

And links to Free Republic do not count, Paul. They have a miserable track record when it comes to integrity and honesty.

The Free Republic folks still think that Bill Clinton ordered forty murders in Arkansas…..

Hint:

Type “Salman Pac” into your browser.

30,600 hits on Yahoo.

Take your pick, but this is a start:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1413167/posts

Saddam trained terrorists. Many have tried to link Saddam and Osama — there were such connnections — but those connections pale compared to Saddam and other terrorists groups!

I will buy you dinner of your choice at the Scotch if you can prove that Saddam did NOT train and finance terrorists, of any stripe, and that the US Military has said as much!

You will have to get one professor of debate and one professor of political science to agree that you have proven your case.

My address is easy to find. They must send me a written statement that you are 100% correct on this point, and that I am 100% wrong!

When that happens, I will feed your goofy ass and listen to you spout your crap all night, with my mouth shut.

(There is no chance that you will win this one, but try hard, would you?)

The Pentagon has NEVER stated the Saddam was NOT financing terrorists.

In fact, the US Military, Department of Defense web page, which I posted previously, in opposition to your idiot rants, made clear that shortly after Saddam was captured, Iraq was REMOVED FROM THE LIST OF STATE SPONSORS OF TERRORISM BY THE US DEPARTMENT OF STATE.

President Bill Clinton considered Saddam and Iraq to be State Sponsors of Terrorism.

You are a liar.

And a VERY stupid liar at that!

You have already been called out on this point.

You have already been proven wrong.

The Pentagon says that this is not true – are you saying that you know more than the intelligence agencies?

As for the Palestinians – Saddam TRIED to earn his stripes with the Palestinians by paying a bounty to the families of successful suicide bombers.

Unfortunately for Hussein, he was never accepted by the Arabs as a true defender of Palestinian interests.

But, here is a question for you, Mr. Know-It-All….

Who violated more UN resolutions, Saddam Hussein’s Iraq or the US supported State of Israel?

Cowardly? Nice try, Paul.

If by that you mean I look at foreign policy with a logical approach, then yes.

If you are challenging my personal courage, I have news for you, Rossell.

Hitler were in 1938? 1939? 1940? 1941?

Nice try – even you can’t believe that Saddam Hussein was in any manner equal to the threat of Adolph Hitler.

As I said, Saddam DIDN’T EVEN CONTROL ALL OF HIS OWN COUNTRY.

Christ.

I said that FDR aided our Allies before a formal declaration of war. The Americans took no active combat role.

Even a GOP revisionist like you should be able to understand that.

By the way, are you suggesting that FDR should NOT have provided aid for Hitler’s enemies?

You were caught being wrong, again, ever get tired of that?

You spout selected facts from history, while you LEARN nothing.

Hitler was WEAK in the beginning too.

Cowardly people like YOU, WS, made Hitler strong!

Kuwait was a member of the United Nations, as was Saudi Arabia, when Saddam invaded.

The United States is also a member state.

An Act of War is more powerful than a Declaration of war.

The United States was AT WAR with Iraq under Bush #1, Bill Clinton, and George W. Bush.

Saddam shot at our airplanes.

Saddam trained and financed terrorists.

Saddam financed suicide bomgings in Israel, against ANOTHER one our US allies.

You are being ridiculous!

Hitler, Mussolini and Hirohito were a true menace to the free world. Are you in any way, shape or form trying to say that Saddam Hussein was a threat of anywhere near that magnitude?

Saddam Hussein did not even control all of his own country, yet the Neocons would have us believe that he was a threat to the United States.

Can we get a BULLSHIT chorus?

http://www.ww2pacific.com/lendlease.html

American ships were used to hunt down German submarines, prior to any declaration of war by the United States!

Hitler didnt bomb Pearl Harbor either, yet we were fighting Hitler prior to any declaration of war by the US or by Germany.

Surely paulie isnt implying that saddam had anything to do with 9/11?

Even bushco denies that old lie.

Post the date where Saddam declared war on the US.

It didn’t happen.

By the way, didnt Iraq declare war on the US?

You conveniently forget that Germany declared war on the US.

I have to agree with some of the posts above. The “peace mom” meme was a little cheesy and immature. We hope you will do better.

Yes, the HUGE armies that they have, artillery and tanks, and the naval capabilities, destroyers and battle ships, and the air force, bombers and fighter planes, why they could invade China and France any minute now.

Or we could recognize that radical Islam is just a relatively small part of the Muslim faith and deal with it accordingly.

To compare Hitler, Mussolini and Hirohito with bin Laden is ridiculous.

Christ.