Dobson choices dwindling

Focus on the Family’s James Dobson may have some free time on Nov. 4, 2008. Having said earlier that he could not vote for John McCain "under any circumstances," Dobson now saysRudy Giuliani wouldn’t get his vote either. The problem? Giuliani’s abortion-rights record and messy personal history. So if either man gets the GOP nomination, Dobson wrote, "I will either cast my ballot for an also-ran — or if worse comes to worst — not vote in a presidential election for the first time in my adult life."
Posted by Rhonda Holman

36 Comments

  1. brian
    Posted May 22, 2007 at 1:42 pm | Permalink

    Why do I care who James Dobson plans to vote for? Can I be the next to get a blog about who I plan to vote for?

  2. Posted May 22, 2007 at 1:46 pm | Permalink

    Ditto

  3. littlejohn
    Posted May 22, 2007 at 1:48 pm | Permalink

    I personally don;t care how Dobson votes, but as the leader of thousands if not millions, it is newsworthy.

  4. fleettwood
    Posted May 22, 2007 at 1:53 pm | Permalink

    Isn’t the election a year and a half away?holman = lazy

  5. BG
    Posted May 22, 2007 at 1:57 pm | Permalink

    this guy is a one issue dipshit..got no use for him..

  6. Jed
    Posted May 22, 2007 at 1:57 pm | Permalink

    Hey, If Dobson can convince his followers to get out of the election process altogether….

  7. XXX
    Posted May 22, 2007 at 2:38 pm | Permalink

    I get a little nervous about people like Dobson.Jim JonesHeaven’s GateWaco

    They seem to cater to the weakest minds among us.

  8. cat
    Posted May 22, 2007 at 3:02 pm | Permalink

    This guy is the one of those Evangelical Christians that Geroge W. Bush spoke to in weekly phone chats – remember?

    Dobson, like him or not, is listened to and followed without any questions asked by many, many people. Since it was the Evangelicals that brought us the likes of GWB and his crooked cronies, maybe Dobson sitting out the next election and NOT voting is a blessing in disguise. God surely does work in mysterious ways doesn’t he?

  9. Mark
    Posted May 22, 2007 at 3:13 pm | Permalink

    Dobson is going to support Romney just like Pat Robertson and the late Jerry Falwell. The fix is in.

  10. outlander
    Posted May 22, 2007 at 3:22 pm | Permalink

    I think there is a good chance that Dobson will end up endorsing Mitt Romney. He has already said a number of favorable things about him. That would be huge in removing the “Mormon factor” that keeps some evangelicals from considering Mitt.

  11. Parkay
    Posted May 22, 2007 at 4:06 pm | Permalink

    There is no chance that Dr. Dobson will sit out a presidential election. If the Republican candidate is unaccaptable (Giuliani=pro-abortion, pro-sodomy; McCain is pro-amnesty, pro-embryonic-stem-cell; Romney is a flip-flopping Mormon cult member), he will vote for a pro-life pro-marriage pro-family low-tax third-party candidate, and will put such a third-party candidate on the ballot if need be. But Dobson would call for the abandonment of the Republican Party, and probably get it, if the presidential nominee is Giuliani.

  12. Ben
    Posted May 22, 2007 at 4:15 pm | Permalink

    GOOD! Let’s all hope Giuliani gets the nomination!

  13. Ben
    Posted May 22, 2007 at 4:17 pm | Permalink

    GOOD! Let’s all hope Giuliani gets the nomination!

  14. Ben
    Posted May 22, 2007 at 4:24 pm | Permalink

    I know at least one “Ranch Davidian” type who also says he would never vote for a Mormon or a Catholic. So, that takes Romney and Brownback out of the picture for him!

  15. Ben
    Posted May 22, 2007 at 4:26 pm | Permalink

    I know at least one “Ranch Davidian” type who also says he would never vote for a Mormon or a Catholic. So, that takes Romney and Brownback out of the picture for him!

  16. Posted May 22, 2007 at 4:27 pm | Permalink

    I know at least one “Ranch Davidian” type who also says he would never vote for a Mormon or a Catholic. So, that takes Romney and Brownback out of the picture for him!

  17. Posted May 22, 2007 at 4:48 pm | Permalink

    The press is only interested in who Dobson endorses because bible thumpers are sheep who can’t think for themselves so they need Dobson to tell them who to vote for.

  18. political_mom
    Posted May 22, 2007 at 5:01 pm | Permalink

    God we can only hope that Dobson and his followers stay out of the next election…lets make it so they NEVER have another candidate they support!

  19. Long Time Poster, First Time Lurker
    Posted May 22, 2007 at 5:59 pm | Permalink

    Jesus will come to Dobson in a dream and he’ll support someone.

    The actual voting is still several months away and the twice-born have a lot of clout in GOP caucuses and primaries. Dobson is playing the field. Which ever Republic candidate ponies up the most cash will get his endorsement.

    The top three candidates have the cash to make a difference. Dobson has only to claim Jesus told him Mormonism isn’t an issue, or McCain or Rudy has seen the light. Sam the Sham Brownback doesn’t have top-tier cash, but he could stop campaigning tomorrow and donate to Focus on the Family and buy a victory (or credible finish) in Iowa and South Carolina.

    Dobson is like every other evangelical huckster. He’s in it for the cash. Someone will pony up the money and Dobson will share his “revelation” with his flock. Count on it.

  20. Kev
    Posted May 22, 2007 at 8:46 pm | Permalink

    Good! Please let them stay at home on election day! The country will be much better off if Dobson and that bunch stay home.

  21. outlander
    Posted May 22, 2007 at 10:00 pm | Permalink

    Doug, it looks like you and LTP, LTL are playing ignorant experts on the “religious right”.

    If you don’t know what you’re talking about boys, just make something up out of your ample ignorance or your irrational fear.

  22. Brian
    Posted May 22, 2007 at 10:25 pm | Permalink

    For by thy words thou shall be justified, and by thy words thou shall be condemned.’ (Mt.12.33ff KJV)

    If Pat Robertson, Jerry Falwell, and the their associates can be taken as somewhat representative of the religious right’s positions (not a horrendous assumption given their popularity), then more than a little skepticism and cynicism is warranted.

  23. Kemmmy
    Posted May 23, 2007 at 12:32 am | Permalink

    Has Dobson not heard of Sam Brownback?

  24. Posted May 23, 2007 at 12:52 am | Permalink

    Outlander, only sheep need a shepherd.

  25. Posted May 23, 2007 at 9:03 am | Permalink

    Hey, Sam. I think I know where you can get a vote. Call Jimmie D.

  26. ksfarmgrrl
    Posted May 23, 2007 at 9:41 am | Permalink

    “or if worse comes to worst — not vote in a presidential election for the first time in my adult life.”

    From his lips to god’s ears…

    Funny, such “positive” christian folks like dobson, falwell, pat, terry, joe, fred, et al. just seem to be proficient at being AGAINST things.

    They have a lot of trouble being FOR anything. They are better at killing than creating. And whipping up hate against something, not creating positive energy FOR something.

    Is it any wonder that style of “leadership” affects the sheeple who follow? Yer more likely to see the disciples of the evangelical preachers carring torches and pitchforks than the tools of good will.

    See terry fox and joe wright.

  27. ksfarmgrrl
    Posted May 23, 2007 at 9:49 am | Permalink

    Ya know, another funny thing about this? I dont hear anyone asking “WWHS”.

    Who would haggarty support?

  28. Wayreth
    Posted May 23, 2007 at 10:02 am | Permalink

    Let’s hope that he stays out of the elections. That way we can move away from the religious rights view of how the US should be.

  29. ksgrm
    Posted May 23, 2007 at 10:23 am | Permalink

    You know you guys are a piece of art. Created daily. I have said before I am a Christian and it does affect my decisions to a point. What many here are overlooking is that everyone that contributes here has an agenda, for farmie it is gay rights, cosmos’ is global warming, others are cch advocates, many are pro-choice. For these voters they are ‘relegious’ about these topics. The dictionary defines it as “A cause, principle, or activity pursued with zeal or conscientious devotion”. This has nothing to do with being a Christian but drives their actions none the less.

    Why should Christians have to set back and not have a voice in the election process? I have said in the past that many Christians are not one issue voters. They will look at all candidates and choose the one that they agree with on most things.

    It would be self destructive to vote for Hillary with whom I have no agreement instead of Rudy because I don’t support his pro-choice stance.

    Dodson is one man speaking for the relative few in the grand scheme of things, who will shoot himself in the foot while making a point.

  30. Brian
    Posted May 23, 2007 at 11:20 am | Permalink

    Maybe it’s because cch, global warming, etc. are single issues. They may end up influencing one for or against a certain candidate, but the preference for that single issue has to be balanced off against the candidates’ other stances.

    Many right wing evangelical, orthodox, Christian voters vote almost exclusively on a candidate’s adherence to their whole Christian package…Catholic, nah….liberal Christian who doesn’t accept miracles, nah…Jew, God forbid, no !

    Finally, I don’t know of too many other groups who want to meld Church with State. Look to the Inquisition, Oliver Cromwell, radical Islam today, to see what you get with a theology based system of government.

  31. brian
    Posted May 23, 2007 at 1:44 pm | Permalink

    hey you are not me

  32. Brian
    Posted May 23, 2007 at 1:47 pm | Permalink

    I use a capital B !! :-)

    Seriously, I didn’t know there was another brian posting. If you want me to change just say the word.

  33. brian
    Posted May 23, 2007 at 3:10 pm | Permalink

    i have been posting here with a lowercase for a while. Too bad they blocked the email addy’s now or this would be distinguishable

  34. Brian
    Posted May 23, 2007 at 3:14 pm | Permalink

    brian,

    It’s yours…I’ll switch to BFAH.

  35. Ben
    Posted May 23, 2007 at 3:19 pm | Permalink

    “Dodson is one man speaking for the relative few in the grand scheme of things”

    That is true ksgrm but such a few can turn an election. Look at what 3% for Ralph Nader did in New Hampshire and Florida in 2000.

    I hope Dobson bolts the GOP like Nader did the Dems.

  36. brian
    Posted May 24, 2007 at 9:02 am | Permalink

    BFAH,Thanks