Couric was wrong woman for the job

Katie Couric has not helped CBS News’ ratings, the New York Times reported. It’s still in third place, and ratings continue to dwindle. CBS producers had hoped that Couric, as well as a spiffed-up broadcast, would attract younger viewers. Though it did draw in younger women, her sunny, morning-show disposition hasn’t drawn many traditional hard-news lovers.
But speculation over whether a woman delivering the news has stunted ratings is laughable and sounds like something from "Anchorman: The Legend of Ron Burgundy."
It’s not that Couric is a woman; it’s that she isn’t the right woman for the job.
Posted by Andie Clum

50 Comments

  1. Mark
    Posted May 18, 2007 at 12:41 pm | Permalink

    My wife brought it up to me a month ago that Katie was being axed. I likes her. I thought her CNN turn-the-tables interview of Larry King was smashing.

    But the CBS Evening News serves the older, Lipitor, Dulcolax segment of the population. The Evening News needs someone with gravitas. Like how about Jane Pauley?

  2. Pedant
    Posted May 18, 2007 at 12:45 pm | Permalink

    I guess I need to get onboard with Lipitor, then.

    I never understood why CBS thought trading Bob Schieffer for Katie Couric would in any way help their news broadcast.

    Schieffer is just a class act. Old, but so what. To me he’s the news version of sport’s Frank Buck (StL Cards) or Denny Matthews (Royals). Not much flash a half-hour at a time; it’s only in the long run when you realize how highly you value each’s skills.

    Don’t get me wrong, I like Couric (I guess), but trading Schieffer for her was, imo and as ksfrmgrrl likes to say, like jumping over the dime to find a penny.

  3. Ben
    Posted May 18, 2007 at 12:47 pm | Permalink

    PBS has some good female news people – Charlene Hunter-Galt comes to mind. Also Gwin Iffel (sp?) on Washington Week.

    They might not be ‘cute’ and ‘perky’ but they are serious news people.

  4. Posted May 18, 2007 at 12:52 pm | Permalink

    Yeah, what Ben said – I like those two female broadcasters from PBS.

    Schieffer is a class act…CBS had a guaranteed audience with Schieffer and just blew it when they brought in Couric.

  5. cosmos
    Posted May 18, 2007 at 1:05 pm | Permalink

    Interesting connections between Bush and Bob Schieffer’s brother…http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Schiefferhttp://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=John_Thomas_Schieffer

  6. GMC70
    Posted May 18, 2007 at 1:15 pm | Permalink

    Ya think the problem isn’t who delivers the news, but with the credibility of CBS news generally, after Rather got caught with the hand in the proverbial cookie jar? Expecting a perky face to fix that is simply putting icing on a turd and claiming it’s a brownie.

  7. Posted May 18, 2007 at 1:21 pm | Permalink

    I think they were hoping that all of those people who watch the Today show (it is the number one morning show) would follow her to CBS to watch her in the evening but that obviously didn’t happen. I liked her on Today, but she’s not that great and I am definitely a creature of habit so I’m not likely to start watching a completely different channel like that. Plus, I think her perkiness and obvious attempt at youthfulness is kind of a slap in the face of their current viewers. I used to work at a TV station and it is amazing how picky people are about news anchors and how they look.

  8. ksfarmgrrl
    Posted May 18, 2007 at 1:22 pm | Permalink

    I think that’s wishful thinking on your part gmc. As time goes on, a lot of folks see the bushco pattern and fingerprints all over the Dan Rather firing. I know you dont, but many do.

    I dont mind Katie or her personality. What I do mind are the inane changes made to the broadcast, and the dumbing down of news as entertainment.

    You could have St. Walter delivering that crap and it STILL wouldnt fly.

    And these days, we have a choice about where we get our news. And more and more of us get it from the internet.

    Maybe CBS should try hiring from the pool of netroots activists.

  9. ksfarmgrrl
    Posted May 18, 2007 at 1:25 pm | Permalink

    Sorry, still thinking. I think this is also partly an overreaction to the Dan Rather thing.

    CBS is so desperate for viewer demographics and market share that they went too far not to be a “big bad news org” that so many said they were. They went for soft and cute and cuddly.

    Heheheh. How’s THAT workin’ for them?

  10. GMC70
    Posted May 18, 2007 at 1:29 pm | Permalink

    KFG -

    You’d see “bushco fingerprints” if a meteor fell to earth on your back 40. You see what you want to see.

  11. ksfarmgrrl
    Posted May 18, 2007 at 1:35 pm | Permalink

    You are right, GMC, I would.

    And if it were just me, you would have a point. But these patterns of “smear your opponent” and having supporting documents disappear, (like some of bush’s military records and his drivers license records), dont help matters any.

    The bush crime family has a way of silencing people who are not loyal to them. And mc rove has proven there is no depth to which he will plunge on behalf of his “permanent republican majority”.

    Nixon’s dirty tricksters got nothing on the BFEE. And again, I’m not the only one who thinks so.

    And GMC? I think I could also fairly say, bush could fart on you and you’d think it smelled like roses.

    Like me, you also see what you want.

  12. Wiseman
    Posted May 18, 2007 at 1:39 pm | Permalink

    Younger viewers?No way, most of the younger viewers are too busy with other things than to be watching what their parents watch; besides how mature do you think they are?

  13. Posted May 18, 2007 at 1:42 pm | Permalink

    I would be considered a younger viewer and I watch the news at least 3 times a day.

  14. Posted May 18, 2007 at 1:43 pm | Permalink

    In fact, I watch the news more than my parents do.

  15. mrbill
    Posted May 18, 2007 at 1:46 pm | Permalink

    The average age for the network news at 6:00 is 60 years old. They are not in the least interested in some “perky” twit giving them news. They want an old grump like Schiefer or a grown up like Gibson.

    The perkys are for Cable news and their 45 second attention span demographics and their loud childish swirling graphics run by local teenagers and his new Mac.

    Or Susan Peters with her incessantly shrieking “Seen Only on KAKE”

    If you want news in context and get some actual facts then its only on Lehrer on PBS or CSPAN.

    Otherwise its only the most recent MWG (Missing White Girl) or the media showing us that dry grass will burn really really fast, with hours of endless fire coverage.

    Or local TV here with 2 hrs of storm coverage of it raining in McCook NE.

  16. Posted May 18, 2007 at 1:48 pm | Permalink

    I’m a younger person… I do watch the news, but im partial to ABC’s World News, I tend to like the different types of stores he runs. But I also spend twice as much time watching or reading news online as I spend watching on TV. I realize that each station, especially the locals, have their own agenda. I do enjoying FUX news just so I can laugh that the rhetoric spewing from their mouths…

  17. Ben
    Posted May 18, 2007 at 1:50 pm | Permalink

    mrbill – agreed.

    On a Wolfowitz thread I posted a good defense of him that I lifted from the PBS NewsHour site. Rather than having the ‘news-guy’ tell me the story they had former UN ambassador Andrew Young. Someone who knows the issue inside and out. That is something you definitely do NOT get on soundbite news.

  18. Posted May 18, 2007 at 1:50 pm | Permalink

    Anyone seen Naked News? Now there is a news show that we can agree can attract some viewers and raise the attentions of all ages…

  19. Posted May 18, 2007 at 1:53 pm | Permalink

    I’ve just always watched NBC, I think it’s because that’s what my parents watched when I was young so I kind of stuck with it. Plus, I worked at an NBC affiliate so that probably didn’t hurt anything. But I also read a lot of it online too. And obviously I read the Eagle online… I will admit that I am kind of an anomaly among many people my age, but to stereotype all “young’uns” as uninterested in the news and current events would be a gross misrepresentation.

  20. Mrage
    Posted May 18, 2007 at 3:04 pm | Permalink

    I remember Melissa Beck at KSN became Melissa McDermott who anchored the CBS late night news for years.

    She was hot and that helps bring in viewers. But she was serious when news was bad, great depth of character.

    She left CBS, don’t know where.

    Going after Couric was one thing, but replacing her if she’s off to write a book or get married again, CBS might call Melissa and offer her the 5:30 job.

    ABC and NBC have the guys, nothing new with them.

    Get to the news and be done with it. Too much “celebrity” drags things down.

    I do like how ABC just starts the news without a big advertisement of the show. CBS should drop the big lead in for Couric.

    Stop those interviews in chairs. Sit at the desk and talk.

  21. Posted May 18, 2007 at 3:14 pm | Permalink

    That’s one nice thing that NBC w/ Brian Williams has been trying lately is only using one sponsor so they use less commercials meaning more time for the news. It’s kind of nice but they’ve only done it a couple times and I don’t know if it will actually become a practice.

  22. Steven Davis
    Posted May 18, 2007 at 3:43 pm | Permalink

    “And GMC? I think I could also fairly say, bush could fart on you and you’d think it smelled like roses.

    “Like me, you also see what you want.” [or smell what he wants to smell]

    There is a body of scientific evidence to support this truth of which you speak. I appreciate you being honest enough to say it. GMC, despite himself, is also sometimes honest enough to fess up to his pre-conceptions.

  23. Steven Davis
    Posted May 18, 2007 at 3:55 pm | Permalink

    The term used to describe these “smell what you want to smell inclinations” are mental or cognitive heuristics. These are short-cuts or rules of thumb which are generally helpful. But they are not helpful when there is either a MC Rove or PT Barnum on every corner trying to sell you a load of shit. And in the sales pitch is a well researched appeal to your inclinations and biases.

    Sorry another commericial for a well-done book:

    _UnSpun: Finding Facts in a World of Disinformation_ by Jackson and Jamieson

    The biggest surprise for me from this book is how often Bush and his policies fell victim to disinformation attacks. I came away thinking ‘there really is Karma operating in the world today.’

  24. GMC70
    Posted May 18, 2007 at 3:57 pm | Permalink

    KFG -

    “And GMC? I think I could also fairly say, bush could fart on you and you’d think it smelled like roses.”

    While certainly we all see the world through our own rose-colored glasses, it’s clear that you don’t know me as well as you think you do. Cite any writings of mine where I have backed this administration repeatedly and blindly. I don’t think you’ll find it.

    I simply don’t have the blind knee-jerk Bush Derangement Syndrome you’ve displayed (and apparantly admit to) so often.

  25. Tom Paine
    Posted May 18, 2007 at 4:21 pm | Permalink

    If the news wants to be taken seriously it needs to drop the tabloid bullshit. Like why is Anna Nicole still in the News, or in the news in the first place?Who cares that Paris Hilton’s going to jail and what has Paris actually done that merits a mention in the News

  26. Erik
    Posted May 18, 2007 at 4:37 pm | Permalink

    Perhaps they ought to bring back Dan Rather. Regardless of what he did, I dont think he deserved the sack for it.

    Too bad Cronkite isn’t doing too well these days, i’d like to see him do the news again.

  27. Kev
    Posted May 18, 2007 at 6:03 pm | Permalink

    The TV network news make me sick to watch so I don’t watch. They run constant ads for drugs. I need Lipitor for my heart. Lunesta so I can sleep, Celebrex for my arthritus, the other stuff for “Restless Leg Syndrome” and on and on. I started to feel like I was in my doctor’s office! So I quit watching it.

  28. political_mom
    Posted May 18, 2007 at 6:40 pm | Permalink

    Lets face it, there were people upset that she was put in the anchor position in the first place. They wanted her to fail from the get-go. CBS did something innovative, put a woman, a fresh face out there to try to attract younger viewers. Unfortunately it didn’t work. People wanted her to do badly. They made it happen. Self fulfilling prophesy. So sad.

  29. political_mom
    Posted May 18, 2007 at 6:42 pm | Permalink

    It is also sad that Tony believes that sexualizing women is the way to get viewers. It’s probably true, but what does that say about our culture? Show me some hooters, and I’ll entertain the idea you might have a brain?

  30. cat
    Posted May 18, 2007 at 7:14 pm | Permalink

    Melissa Beck was hot? Her voice sounded like chalk squeaking against the chalkboard. Made my dog howl every time.

  31. Mrage
    Posted May 18, 2007 at 7:37 pm | Permalink

    Melissa McDermott was hot in 2006, haven’t seen her since. She divorced Todd McDermott some net report said.

  32. Joe Williams
    Posted May 18, 2007 at 9:32 pm | Permalink

    There used to be a female anchor on CNN headline news name Lynne Russell who was both professional and classy.

    http://www.lynnerussell.com/gallery/pages/lynnecnn8×10_jpg.html

  33. Mary Caruso
    Posted May 18, 2007 at 9:45 pm | Permalink

    I totally agree with Tom, I can’t stand to watch the “news” because of all the focus on pop culture instead of important events that really affect our lives….BBC news is a bit better, my cable used to air World News International, which was the best, but because it was serious coverage of ALL world events, it probably didn’t get the ratings and was dropped. The sad truth is the networks only give people what they want to see and hear…when they broke into regular programming to announce the death of Anna Nicole Smith, I realized what sorry shape our country is really in. I can’t begin to tell you how depressed and disgusted I get about it.

  34. Joe Williams
    Posted May 18, 2007 at 9:54 pm | Permalink

    I get my news from NPR.

  35. Posted May 19, 2007 at 12:48 am | Permalink

    Couric was hired because she was female. The decision had nothing to do with how fit she was for the job.

    That said, CBS news is in the toilet because NO one trusts them to report the “facts”. As seen from Dan Rather and his producers inability and unwillingness to retract their specious report “Rathergate” about Pres. Bush’s guard service, they have lost any creditability they had.

    The networks continue to produce and air biased reports. Their anchors and reporters don’t even know the word “objective” and have only a passing acquaintance with facts. This is why they are losing viewers and they are not losing them to the other networks (except for Fox). They are losing them to the internet, where people can get the who, what, where then and how as well as several different ideas about why (not just their ideas)

  36. cat
    Posted May 19, 2007 at 2:37 pm | Permalink

    Anyone who thinks Fox News is fair and balanced needs their head examined by a competent psychiatrist.

    All the networks news basically have the same news, except Fox who will steadfastly defend Bush’s policies no matter what.

    And as for Dan Rather, I think maybe the 70% majority of Americans who now disapprove of George W. Bush would give Dan Rather the benefit of the doubt when it came to reporting any underhanded dirty deal that GWB was involved in.

  37. GMC70
    Posted May 20, 2007 at 12:26 pm | Permalink

    cat:

    I’d agreee . . . if there was any doubt as to the forgery of the “documents” Rather proclaimed proved his infamous scoop. There isn’t any doubt whatsoever. And it was a bad forgery at that, one that any journalist worth the label would have recognized. But it fit his agenda, so he didn’t see what was in front of him.

    I don’t think Rather set out to knowingly pawn forged documents. The documents were what he wanted to find, so he looked through his own “rose-colored glasses” and, well, got caught with his agenda down.

  38. walter cronkite
    Posted May 21, 2007 at 7:33 am | Permalink

    I was shocked that John Roberts didn’t get tha anchor job.I thinkhe was too.Maybe that’s why he’son CNN now.

  39. Egdh
    Posted May 21, 2007 at 1:32 pm | Permalink

    Get Katie out from under that desk, dress her up in those short skirts and stilletos like on today show and see the ratings climb.

  40. Posted June 27, 2007 at 12:10 pm | Permalink

    My mind is like an empty room. Nothing seems worth thinking about. More or less not much noteworthy happening worth mentioning, but it’s not important. I guess it doesn’t bother me. I’ve just been letting everything wash over me lately.

  41. Posted August 8, 2007 at 1:55 pm | Permalink

    People should be allowed to go naked in certain recreational areas only – Or specify those areas and you have another persuasive speech topic

  42. Posted August 9, 2007 at 3:53 pm | Permalink

    I’ve just been letting everything pass me by , but so it goes. I just don’t have much to say these days. Pfft. I can’t be bothered with anything. More or less nothing seems worth doing. I haven’t gotten much done recently, but oh well.

  43. Posted August 13, 2007 at 11:13 am | Permalink

    Buyers of guns must take gun-safety courses

  44. Posted August 14, 2007 at 11:07 am | Permalink

    I feel like a fog, not that it matters. I’ve pretty much been doing nothing , but eh. Today was a loss. I haven’t gotten much done for a while.

  45. Posted August 18, 2007 at 12:39 am | Permalink

    I haven’t been up to much recently, but whatever. I just don’t have much to say lately. Basically nothing happening to speak of. So it goes. My mind is like a complete blank. Such is life.

  46. Posted August 21, 2007 at 8:50 am | Permalink

    Males should be allowed to go shirtless at home only – Or vary with places for another persuasive speech topic

  47. Posted August 23, 2007 at 11:45 am | Permalink

    Blame the parents of a murderer parents for the crime

  48. Posted August 26, 2007 at 3:51 am | Permalink

    Help the homeless down the street and persuade them to look for work

  49. Posted September 23, 2007 at 3:41 pm | Permalink

    My life’s been completely unremarkable recently. I haven’t been up to anything. I just don’t have much to say. I’ve just been letting everything pass me by. Shrug. I don’t care.

  50. Posted October 2, 2007 at 9:59 am | Permalink

    I feel like a fog, not that it matters. I’ve pretty much been doing nothing , but eh. Today was a loss. I haven’t gotten much done for a while.