Comments on: School board wise to take second look at clinic

By: Gonzadexproshoot

Gonzadexproshoot — Wed, 18 Jul 2007 16:08:37 +0000

Whazz up?Who can vouch for them? Anyone even heard of them? - http://steroidssupplier.comExcellent products!!kind regards

By: sotheysaid

sotheysaid — Wed, 11 Apr 2007 15:51:54 +0000

All you have to do is follow the money. This is not about working with the community or seeing that children that do not have medical resources are served. It is all about the money for the school district which was probably getting a sweet heart deal.

If the school board members are so in touch with their districts they would know what their district have and what they don’ t have. This shows that they are not in touch with their districts.

It’s all about a handful of school board members that do what the school superintendent tells them and the unions. How about truly doing your homework on the items you vote on. If you don’t have the time or the desire to do so then don’t run for the position.

Get in touch with the community to represent.

By: dgdrw4432

dgdrw4432 — Wed, 11 Apr 2007 13:28:40 +0000

From the Wichita Eagle: “School board member Kevass Harding said that he should have done his homework before voting for the GraceMed deal in February.”

It’s a good thing for Rev. Harding that he didn’t admit this before the election. Or maybe he did, but the newspaper didn’t print it until afterwards.

By: GSheridan

GSheridan — Wed, 11 Apr 2007 10:46:09 +0000

Hmmm…interesting.

Proximity to a school could (should) be a major factor in the decision, IF children right now are not being served.

A child who needs to hurry home after school might not be able to take time to stop by the Center for Health and Wellness, but could possibly go to the school clinic during the day.

Adults, who either come themselves, or bring small children will not have an issue.

Perhaps the Center for Health and Wellness should move.

Which facility can reasonably serve more people?

That should be the consideration.

Not “who was here first?”

I mean, let’s use our brain, folks.

Attaching clinics to schools is a pretty progressive idea. I hope the commission doesn’t throw the baby out with the bathwater.

By: kelly

kelly — Wed, 11 Apr 2007 10:29:45 +0000

Even though USD 259 perhaps should have seen this conflict coming down the road sooner, let’s give them credit for stopping this possible duplication of services before it went any farther. If there is a large underserved population – and I don’t know if that is even an accurate conclusion, then why isn’t the Center for Health and Wellness satisfying that need? I think that there are a number of unanswered questions here, at which USD 259 quite appropriately has decided to take a closer look.