<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New immigration plan unlikely to pass Congress</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/04/new_immigration/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/04/new_immigration/</link>
	<description>The Wichita Eagle Editorial Department Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 02:53:37 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: we need YOU to call and fax</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/04/new_immigration/#comment-255374</link>
		<dc:creator>we need YOU to call and fax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 12:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/04/new_immigration/#comment-255374</guid>
		<description>On September 27, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) announced that the DREAM Act would not be considered as an amendment to H.R. 1585, the Defense Department authorization bill for fiscal year 2008.

The Washington Times reports, however, that Reid will push for passage of the DREAM Act, which would grant amnesty to millions of illegal aliens, by different means (possibly in its stand-alone form [S. 774, sponsored by Assistant Majority Leader Dick Durbin {D-Ill.}]) before the Senate adjourns for the year (i.e., on or about November 16).

Reid&#039;s concession on the DoD authorization bill may doom other immigration-related amendments to the defense bill as well.

Please fax your senators: We have stopped the DREAM Act for now, but there is already a push to pass it as a stand-alone bill.

Senator Sam Brownback contact information- Taken from his web site

Office location		Phone #			Fax #Washington DC office 	1-202-224-6521		1-202-228-1265Overland Park Office		1-913-492-6378		1-913-492-7253Topeka office			1-785-233-2503		1-785-233-2616Garden City office		1-620-231-6040		1-620-231-6347Wichita office			1-316-264-8066		1-316-264-9078

Senator Pat Roberts Contact Information Taken from his web site

Washington DC office 	1-202-224-4774  		1-202-224-3514Overland Park Office		1-913-451-9343  		1-913-451-9446Topeka office 			1-785-295-2745  		1-785-235-3665Wichita office 			1-316-263-0416  		1-316-263-0273Dodge City Office		1-620-227-2244  		1-620-227-2264

Representative Todd Tiahrt, Contact information taken from his web site

Wichita OfficeAddress:	155 North Market St.Suite 400Wichita, KS 67202Phone:	316.262.8992Fax:	316.262.5309Washington OfficeAddress:	2441 Rayburn BuildingWashington, DC 20515Phone:	202.225.6216Fax:	202.225.3489

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On September 27, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) announced that the DREAM Act would not be considered as an amendment to H.R. 1585, the Defense Department authorization bill for fiscal year 2008.</p>
<p>The Washington Times reports, however, that Reid will push for passage of the DREAM Act, which would grant amnesty to millions of illegal aliens, by different means (possibly in its stand-alone form [S. 774, sponsored by Assistant Majority Leader Dick Durbin {D-Ill.}]) before the Senate adjourns for the year (i.e., on or about November 16).</p>
<p>Reid&#8217;s concession on the DoD authorization bill may doom other immigration-related amendments to the defense bill as well.</p>
<p>Please fax your senators: We have stopped the DREAM Act for now, but there is already a push to pass it as a stand-alone bill.</p>
<p>Senator Sam Brownback contact information- Taken from his web site</p>
<p>Office location		Phone #			Fax #Washington DC office 	1-202-224-6521		1-202-228-1265Overland Park Office		1-913-492-6378		1-913-492-7253Topeka office			1-785-233-2503		1-785-233-2616Garden City office		1-620-231-6040		1-620-231-6347Wichita office			1-316-264-8066		1-316-264-9078</p>
<p>Senator Pat Roberts Contact Information Taken from his web site</p>
<p>Washington DC office 	1-202-224-4774  		1-202-224-3514Overland Park Office		1-913-451-9343  		1-913-451-9446Topeka office 			1-785-295-2745  		1-785-235-3665Wichita office 			1-316-263-0416  		1-316-263-0273Dodge City Office		1-620-227-2244  		1-620-227-2264</p>
<p>Representative Todd Tiahrt, Contact information taken from his web site</p>
<p>Wichita OfficeAddress:	155 North Market St.Suite 400Wichita, KS 67202Phone:	316.262.8992Fax:	316.262.5309Washington OfficeAddress:	2441 Rayburn BuildingWashington, DC 20515Phone:	202.225.6216Fax:	202.225.3489</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Econ101</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/04/new_immigration/#comment-255373</link>
		<dc:creator>Econ101</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 05:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/04/new_immigration/#comment-255373</guid>
		<description>Actually, the debate is shifting against illegals:&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8OFA20G0&amp;show_article=1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8OFA20G0&amp;show_article=1&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, the debate is shifting against illegals:<a href="http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8OFA20G0&amp;show_article=1" rel="nofollow">http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8OFA20G0&amp;show_article=1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kev</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/04/new_immigration/#comment-255372</link>
		<dc:creator>Kev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 05:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/04/new_immigration/#comment-255372</guid>
		<description>We all must remember too that, for many employers, it is not just low wages that make the Mexicans attractive. They also have a better work ethic than we Americans do for the most part. They show up on time everyday ready to work while Americans call in sick on Monday and Friday and often show up drunk or on drugs the rest of the week. In addition Mexicans rarely backtalk the boss or say things like &quot;it ain&#039;t my job&quot; when asked to perform task that might be outside the normal scope of their job.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We all must remember too that, for many employers, it is not just low wages that make the Mexicans attractive. They also have a better work ethic than we Americans do for the most part. They show up on time everyday ready to work while Americans call in sick on Monday and Friday and often show up drunk or on drugs the rest of the week. In addition Mexicans rarely backtalk the boss or say things like &#8220;it ain&#8217;t my job&#8221; when asked to perform task that might be outside the normal scope of their job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kev</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/04/new_immigration/#comment-255371</link>
		<dc:creator>Kev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 05:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/04/new_immigration/#comment-255371</guid>
		<description>I am speaking of the major hotels here in Atlanta GA where we live. I guess I should remind folks that don&#039;t know me that I am from Wichita. Don&#039;t live there now...

&quot;Downtown hotels are paying 12 to 15 dollars an hour for housekeepers&quot;

Would you care to clarify your remarks? I think your comment was pulled from your &quot;bad place&quot;.

Who are these hotels of which you speak?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am speaking of the major hotels here in Atlanta GA where we live. I guess I should remind folks that don&#8217;t know me that I am from Wichita. Don&#8217;t live there now&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;Downtown hotels are paying 12 to 15 dollars an hour for housekeepers&#8221;</p>
<p>Would you care to clarify your remarks? I think your comment was pulled from your &#8220;bad place&#8221;.</p>
<p>Who are these hotels of which you speak?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Common Sense</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/04/new_immigration/#comment-255370</link>
		<dc:creator>Common Sense</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 03:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/04/new_immigration/#comment-255370</guid>
		<description>illegal immigration - it hastens the demise of our once great country.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>illegal immigration &#8211; it hastens the demise of our once great country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Republican</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/04/new_immigration/#comment-255369</link>
		<dc:creator>Republican</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 02:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/04/new_immigration/#comment-255369</guid>
		<description>Where is down here Kev?  Your description sound like you are closer to the Mexican border than Wichita...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where is down here Kev?  Your description sound like you are closer to the Mexican border than Wichita&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Johnson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/04/new_immigration/#comment-255368</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 02:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/04/new_immigration/#comment-255368</guid>
		<description>I understand Illegals will get reduced rate college tuition, free health care, social security (even though they never paid in), food stamps, and only have to pay taxes on two of the last five years ....... Can sombody tell us what the process is to be an illegal alien so I too can only pay 2 of the last 5 years of income taxes and get all these free benefits too?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand Illegals will get reduced rate college tuition, free health care, social security (even though they never paid in), food stamps, and only have to pay taxes on two of the last five years &#8230;&#8230;. Can sombody tell us what the process is to be an illegal alien so I too can only pay 2 of the last 5 years of income taxes and get all these free benefits too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fleettwood</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/04/new_immigration/#comment-255367</link>
		<dc:creator>fleettwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 02:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/04/new_immigration/#comment-255367</guid>
		<description>&quot;Downtown hotels are paying 12 to 15 dollars an hour for housekeepers&quot;

Would you care to clarify your remarks?  I think your comment was pulled from your &quot;bad place&quot;.

Who are these hotels of which you speak?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Downtown hotels are paying 12 to 15 dollars an hour for housekeepers&#8221;</p>
<p>Would you care to clarify your remarks?  I think your comment was pulled from your &#8220;bad place&#8221;.</p>
<p>Who are these hotels of which you speak?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kev</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/04/new_immigration/#comment-255366</link>
		<dc:creator>Kev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 02:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/04/new_immigration/#comment-255366</guid>
		<description>No disagreement from me on that. Even if it is shoplifting or DUI- one offense and they are outta here. We have enough homegrown criminals and idiots. We don&#039;t need to import any from Mexico.

&quot;Kev,On their first run-in with the law, they are deported. Second time they do 10 years.&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No disagreement from me on that. Even if it is shoplifting or DUI- one offense and they are outta here. We have enough homegrown criminals and idiots. We don&#8217;t need to import any from Mexico.</p>
<p>&#8220;Kev,On their first run-in with the law, they are deported. Second time they do 10 years.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kev</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/04/new_immigration/#comment-255365</link>
		<dc:creator>Kev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 02:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/04/new_immigration/#comment-255365</guid>
		<description>All the roofers around here I see are Mexicans. Almost all the construction workers I see are Mexican. And if people think Americans want these jobs, come down here. Downtown hotels are paying 12 to 15 dollars an hour for housekeepers and STILL are unable to hire enough legal help. And with unemployment rates headed to virtually zero, the problem will only get much worse. We should be thankful to the Mexicans who sneak in and do all the dirty work so we can live good and stay clean.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All the roofers around here I see are Mexicans. Almost all the construction workers I see are Mexican. And if people think Americans want these jobs, come down here. Downtown hotels are paying 12 to 15 dollars an hour for housekeepers and STILL are unable to hire enough legal help. And with unemployment rates headed to virtually zero, the problem will only get much worse. We should be thankful to the Mexicans who sneak in and do all the dirty work so we can live good and stay clean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrbill</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/04/new_immigration/#comment-255364</link>
		<dc:creator>mrbill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 02:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/04/new_immigration/#comment-255364</guid>
		<description>Tom, you are correct that the constitution says &quot;...and subject to the jurisdiction thereof...&quot;

This is the part that DISallows those here at the behest of their government from having babies and automatically becoming citizens.  Such as, if the French ambassadors wife has a baby here, it is NOT a citizen.  He is here at the behest of his government and is NOT &quot;under the jurisdiction of the US&quot;.  He is a GUEST.

So it can be done this way if they work with the Mexican government and designate them so (doubtful since the Mexican gubment is such a whore) .  Or make it part of a labor contract PRIOR to coming in.

Both the UK and Australia revoked this same nonsense in the 1980&#039;s due to the same crap. Ireland in &#039;04.  They all saw what was happening to their countries.

But it needs to be changed here in any case.  Reading the congressional record when it was adopted actually states who it was initially referring to from the guy who wrote it.   Obviously all the reasons did not make it in, so it still needs to be changed.

Original statement:

Birthright Citizenship and its Original Limitations:The quote below is from the Senator (Jacob Howard) that WROTE the 14th amendment clause.

&quot;Every Person born within the limits of the United States, and subject to their jurisdiction, is by virtue of natural law and national law a citizen of the United States. This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons.&quot;Senator Jacob Howard,co-author of the citizenship clause of the 14th Amendment, 1866.

To bad it did not get written as such.  Maybe somebody will grow a set of brass ones and bring it up...as it would pass , and they know it.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom, you are correct that the constitution says &#8220;&#8230;and subject to the jurisdiction thereof&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>This is the part that DISallows those here at the behest of their government from having babies and automatically becoming citizens.  Such as, if the French ambassadors wife has a baby here, it is NOT a citizen.  He is here at the behest of his government and is NOT &#8220;under the jurisdiction of the US&#8221;.  He is a GUEST.</p>
<p>So it can be done this way if they work with the Mexican government and designate them so (doubtful since the Mexican gubment is such a whore) .  Or make it part of a labor contract PRIOR to coming in.</p>
<p>Both the UK and Australia revoked this same nonsense in the 1980&#8217;s due to the same crap. Ireland in &#8216;04.  They all saw what was happening to their countries.</p>
<p>But it needs to be changed here in any case.  Reading the congressional record when it was adopted actually states who it was initially referring to from the guy who wrote it.   Obviously all the reasons did not make it in, so it still needs to be changed.</p>
<p>Original statement:</p>
<p>Birthright Citizenship and its Original Limitations:The quote below is from the Senator (Jacob Howard) that WROTE the 14th amendment clause.</p>
<p>&#8220;Every Person born within the limits of the United States, and subject to their jurisdiction, is by virtue of natural law and national law a citizen of the United States. This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons.&#8221;Senator Jacob Howard,co-author of the citizenship clause of the 14th Amendment, 1866.</p>
<p>To bad it did not get written as such.  Maybe somebody will grow a set of brass ones and bring it up&#8230;as it would pass , and they know it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fleettwood</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/04/new_immigration/#comment-255363</link>
		<dc:creator>fleettwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 01:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/04/new_immigration/#comment-255363</guid>
		<description>&quot;Or that our economy could handle the disruption.&quot;

Phillip, Phillip, Phillip.Still believing in the &quot;illegals are doing jobs Americans won&#039;t do&quot; line of the Dem party?Hogwash!  We would handle the disruption just fine.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Or that our economy could handle the disruption.&#8221;</p>
<p>Phillip, Phillip, Phillip.Still believing in the &#8220;illegals are doing jobs Americans won&#8217;t do&#8221; line of the Dem party?Hogwash!  We would handle the disruption just fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wiseman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/04/new_immigration/#comment-255362</link>
		<dc:creator>Wiseman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 01:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/04/new_immigration/#comment-255362</guid>
		<description>Tom -So what is your point?I said &quot;WRITE to your representatives&quot;.I did not say anything about the &quot;Minutemen&quot;.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom -So what is your point?I said &#8220;WRITE to your representatives&#8221;.I did not say anything about the &#8220;Minutemen&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SolDevVB</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/04/new_immigration/#comment-255361</link>
		<dc:creator>SolDevVB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 00:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/04/new_immigration/#comment-255361</guid>
		<description>Kev,On their first run-in with the law, they are deported. Second time they do 10 years.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kev,On their first run-in with the law, they are deported. Second time they do 10 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Republican</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/04/new_immigration/#comment-255360</link>
		<dc:creator>Republican</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 00:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/04/new_immigration/#comment-255360</guid>
		<description>Roofing eh Kev?Strange when we had that big hail storm, I didn&#039;t see one Hispanic worker fixing a roof in and around my neighborhood.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roofing eh Kev?Strange when we had that big hail storm, I didn&#8217;t see one Hispanic worker fixing a roof in and around my neighborhood.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kev</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/04/new_immigration/#comment-255359</link>
		<dc:creator>Kev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 00:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/04/new_immigration/#comment-255359</guid>
		<description>Everybody ignores the FACTS on this issue and they all say &quot;ship em all back&quot; or give them a &quot;path to citizenship&quot;. I am not for either. The FACTS are this- we NEED these people as much as they need us. The USA is now in the 5th year of an economic boom of historic job growth. We have an unemployment rate of about 4 percent and falling. Millions of new jobs are expected over the next decade at the same time millions of baby boomers will be leaving the labour force. Without immigrants, our economy will simply stop. Nobody else is going to pick the lettuce, do hot hard roofing and construction work or wash dishes. No Americans want that kind of work. Only the Mexicans are willing to do it and we need it done. So we need to give them AMNESTY and keep them here. What I oppose is a &quot;path to citizenship&quot;. Citizenship should be reserved for those who waited in line and came here legally. Those who sneak in should never get citizenship unless they serve in the armed forces of the United States. But they should be given a &quot;path to permanent residency&quot; if the work, pay taxes, learn English and stay out of any trouble with the law. I would have a program where they could have a 5 year guest worker permit and, if they met those conditions after 5 years, they would be granted Permanent Residency and could live the rest of their lives in the USA but they could not vote, sponsor other immigrants or hold a US passport. That is the price for sneaking in.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everybody ignores the FACTS on this issue and they all say &#8220;ship em all back&#8221; or give them a &#8220;path to citizenship&#8221;. I am not for either. The FACTS are this- we NEED these people as much as they need us. The USA is now in the 5th year of an economic boom of historic job growth. We have an unemployment rate of about 4 percent and falling. Millions of new jobs are expected over the next decade at the same time millions of baby boomers will be leaving the labour force. Without immigrants, our economy will simply stop. Nobody else is going to pick the lettuce, do hot hard roofing and construction work or wash dishes. No Americans want that kind of work. Only the Mexicans are willing to do it and we need it done. So we need to give them AMNESTY and keep them here. What I oppose is a &#8220;path to citizenship&#8221;. Citizenship should be reserved for those who waited in line and came here legally. Those who sneak in should never get citizenship unless they serve in the armed forces of the United States. But they should be given a &#8220;path to permanent residency&#8221; if the work, pay taxes, learn English and stay out of any trouble with the law. I would have a program where they could have a 5 year guest worker permit and, if they met those conditions after 5 years, they would be granted Permanent Residency and could live the rest of their lives in the USA but they could not vote, sponsor other immigrants or hold a US passport. That is the price for sneaking in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TDT</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/04/new_immigration/#comment-255358</link>
		<dc:creator>TDT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 20:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/04/new_immigration/#comment-255358</guid>
		<description>illegal alien stuey finds that the illegal aliens cost Americans BIG TIME.

Here is a stuey that puts is on the line:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.heritage.org/Research/Welfare/sr12.cfm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.heritage.org/Research/Welfare/sr12.cfm&lt;/a&gt;

On the whole the illegal aliens cost us about 2.3 TRILLION DOLLARS a year.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=55135&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=55135&lt;/a&gt;

Add to that all the death they cause in crimes, their crime rate per polulation, the number of drunk drivers deaths and accidents (3:1 hispp/latino to US Citizen ratio illegal aleins in a NC State Study) WHEN DOES IT STOP!!!

That is why we have immigration laws inthe first place!!!!

Posted by: Tyler Durden &#124; April 11, 2007 at 07:52 AM

Okay, when I read this study, I could have sworn it was studying households whose head of household did not have a H.S. diploma. At the very end, during the conclusion, illegals were mentioned, but the study was NOT specifically about them. Good argument for us to make sure that our children do not drop out of school and become a public burden, but I don&#039;t see the illegal alien argument in here.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>illegal alien stuey finds that the illegal aliens cost Americans BIG TIME.</p>
<p>Here is a stuey that puts is on the line:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.heritage.org/Research/Welfare/sr12.cfm" rel="nofollow">http://www.heritage.org/Research/Welfare/sr12.cfm</a></p>
<p>On the whole the illegal aliens cost us about 2.3 TRILLION DOLLARS a year.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=55135" rel="nofollow">http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=55135</a></p>
<p>Add to that all the death they cause in crimes, their crime rate per polulation, the number of drunk drivers deaths and accidents (3:1 hispp/latino to US Citizen ratio illegal aleins in a NC State Study) WHEN DOES IT STOP!!!</p>
<p>That is why we have immigration laws inthe first place!!!!</p>
<p>Posted by: Tyler Durden | April 11, 2007 at 07:52 AM</p>
<p>Okay, when I read this study, I could have sworn it was studying households whose head of household did not have a H.S. diploma. At the very end, during the conclusion, illegals were mentioned, but the study was NOT specifically about them. Good argument for us to make sure that our children do not drop out of school and become a public burden, but I don&#8217;t see the illegal alien argument in here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Republican</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/04/new_immigration/#comment-255357</link>
		<dc:creator>Republican</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 20:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/04/new_immigration/#comment-255357</guid>
		<description>A Texas friend of mine used to joke about the traffic in Houston, Dallas, San Antonio...

He said the quickest way to clear the roads is to announce on the radio in Spanish that there will an ID and Driver&#039;s License road block and check station.

The traffic somehow becomes much lighter after those announcements. :)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Texas friend of mine used to joke about the traffic in Houston, Dallas, San Antonio&#8230;</p>
<p>He said the quickest way to clear the roads is to announce on the radio in Spanish that there will an ID and Driver&#8217;s License road block and check station.</p>
<p>The traffic somehow becomes much lighter after those announcements. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/04/new_immigration/#comment-255356</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 20:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/04/new_immigration/#comment-255356</guid>
		<description>Wiseman,

The &quot;Minutemen&quot; were up in the Capitol in full force this session.  One of them even had to be physically escorted out of a hearing room by State Troopers after attempting to intimidate one of the state reps on the committee.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wiseman,</p>
<p>The &#8220;Minutemen&#8221; were up in the Capitol in full force this session.  One of them even had to be physically escorted out of a hearing room by State Troopers after attempting to intimidate one of the state reps on the committee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wiseman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/04/new_immigration/#comment-255355</link>
		<dc:creator>Wiseman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 20:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/04/new_immigration/#comment-255355</guid>
		<description>I agree with Ken, if all of you on WeBlog and Kansas.Com strongly believe in this then write to the representatives of your district.Communicate to your representatives, how else are they going to know what the people are requiring them to do?The Hispanic communities know this and have used this very well.Special interests at this moment are communicating to your representatives on their desires of what they want, so why let them have the only voice in the matter?Do not let excuses keep you from your freedom of expression or by someone talking you out it by saying that your voice will not be heard, America&#039;s greatest weakness is that very belief.Have faith in what you believe in and speak up.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Ken, if all of you on WeBlog and Kansas.Com strongly believe in this then write to the representatives of your district.Communicate to your representatives, how else are they going to know what the people are requiring them to do?The Hispanic communities know this and have used this very well.Special interests at this moment are communicating to your representatives on their desires of what they want, so why let them have the only voice in the matter?Do not let excuses keep you from your freedom of expression or by someone talking you out it by saying that your voice will not be heard, America&#8217;s greatest weakness is that very belief.Have faith in what you believe in and speak up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Huie</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/04/new_immigration/#comment-255354</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Huie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 19:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/04/new_immigration/#comment-255354</guid>
		<description>Tyler - what paragraph in the conservative Heritage study has that?  I find the claim in the WND article but haven&#039;t found it in the study itself.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tyler &#8211; what paragraph in the conservative Heritage study has that?  I find the claim in the WND article but haven&#8217;t found it in the study itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/04/new_immigration/#comment-255353</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 18:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/04/new_immigration/#comment-255353</guid>
		<description>mrbill,

Changing the &quot;birthright&quot; means changing the US Constitution:

&quot;Amendment 14 - All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.&quot;

Good luck with that.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mrbill,</p>
<p>Changing the &#8220;birthright&#8221; means changing the US Constitution:</p>
<p>&#8220;Amendment 14 &#8211; All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.&#8221;</p>
<p>Good luck with that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrbill</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/04/new_immigration/#comment-255352</link>
		<dc:creator>mrbill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 18:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/04/new_immigration/#comment-255352</guid>
		<description>Yes, putting the burden on those that hire them is the route to self deportation.

The penalties need be much higher and they need to be CRIMINAL.

We can start with seizing the assets of the business.  Then criminalizing not only the Management but the actual top 5 Stockholders and board of directors.  If you arrest a few of the owner/stockholders you will get some new directions.

If they are going to have a guest worker program you can get the ones here now to go home by saying that NO ONE will be hired that IS HERE AFTER JAN 1 2008.  They will ALL be hired through agencies located IN MEXICO.  And the Birthright citizenship will NOT attach to these GUESTS while they are here .

We simply can not have 20 million GUESTS having anchor babies that will never leave.

The current Familial system results in 273 people per LEGAL immigrant.  If you legalize ONE person, they are allowed to bring in every Aunt, Uncle, Cousin, 2nd cousin, grandpa, grandma, brothers, sisters etc.  Up to 273 per person....so its not just AN immigrant, each one of these &quot;immigrants&quot; can amount to 273 people...

Seems they are using an expanded version of the Hillary concept....&quot;Each person creates a Village&quot;.

Canada requires hiring them IN Mexico, the Company hiring must provide each worker with tickets TO and FROM Canada.  They are also required to check out when they leave and are allowed to stay only X amount of months.  No permanency
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, putting the burden on those that hire them is the route to self deportation.</p>
<p>The penalties need be much higher and they need to be CRIMINAL.</p>
<p>We can start with seizing the assets of the business.  Then criminalizing not only the Management but the actual top 5 Stockholders and board of directors.  If you arrest a few of the owner/stockholders you will get some new directions.</p>
<p>If they are going to have a guest worker program you can get the ones here now to go home by saying that NO ONE will be hired that IS HERE AFTER JAN 1 2008.  They will ALL be hired through agencies located IN MEXICO.  And the Birthright citizenship will NOT attach to these GUESTS while they are here .</p>
<p>We simply can not have 20 million GUESTS having anchor babies that will never leave.</p>
<p>The current Familial system results in 273 people per LEGAL immigrant.  If you legalize ONE person, they are allowed to bring in every Aunt, Uncle, Cousin, 2nd cousin, grandpa, grandma, brothers, sisters etc.  Up to 273 per person&#8230;.so its not just AN immigrant, each one of these &#8220;immigrants&#8221; can amount to 273 people&#8230;</p>
<p>Seems they are using an expanded version of the Hillary concept&#8230;.&#8221;Each person creates a Village&#8221;.</p>
<p>Canada requires hiring them IN Mexico, the Company hiring must provide each worker with tickets TO and FROM Canada.  They are also required to check out when they leave and are allowed to stay only X amount of months.  No permanency</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler Durden</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/04/new_immigration/#comment-255351</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler Durden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 18:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/04/new_immigration/#comment-255351</guid>
		<description>Guessed you missed this part there Ben:

&quot;About half of the 17.7 million households studied are illegal aliens. About two-thirds of illegal alien households are headed by someone without a high school degree. Only 10 percent of native-born Americans fit into that category.&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guessed you missed this part there Ben:</p>
<p>&#8220;About half of the 17.7 million households studied are illegal aliens. About two-thirds of illegal alien households are headed by someone without a high school degree. Only 10 percent of native-born Americans fit into that category.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Huie</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/04/new_immigration/#comment-255350</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Huie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 14:37:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/04/new_immigration/#comment-255350</guid>
		<description>Tyler - your interpretation of the Heritage study is flawed.  The 2.3 trillion cost if for ALL low-education households - both citizen and non-citizen.  They do note that 2/3 of non-citizen households are low-skill but do NOT state that a similar fraction of total low-skill households are illegals.  I would be interested in knowing just how many of the low-skill households are citizens.  Also, this is quite an indictment of our education policies.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tyler &#8211; your interpretation of the Heritage study is flawed.  The 2.3 trillion cost if for ALL low-education households &#8211; both citizen and non-citizen.  They do note that 2/3 of non-citizen households are low-skill but do NOT state that a similar fraction of total low-skill households are illegals.  I would be interested in knowing just how many of the low-skill households are citizens.  Also, this is quite an indictment of our education policies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
