Is ’scrotum’ really a dirty word?

An award-winning children’s novel, "The Higher Power of Lucky," is drawing fire from some librarians because in the opening, a character talks about seeing a rattlesnake bite his dog on the "scrotum."
Some librarians apparently think the word is inappropriate for children. One librarian went so far as to accuse the author, Susan Patron (herself a children’s librarian), of engaging in Howard Stern-like shock tactics.
Please. As one Wichita librarian noted, "it’s not even a dirty word" — "scrotum" is a precise and neutral anatomical term. True, it might occasion a few snickers from the target audience, 9- to 12-year-olds, but beyond that, what’s the fuss?
This isn’t some trashy novel — it won this year’s Newbery Award, the most prestigious prize in children’s books. What’s really shocking is that in 2007, some children’s librarians would try to censor a quality book.
It’s good to hear that Wichita librarians aren’t overreacting. But I’m not as optimistic about the response of certain conservative members of the Kansas State Board of Education.
Posted by Randy Scholfield

65 Comments

  1. fleettwood
    Posted February 21, 2007 at 12:37 pm | Permalink

    The snake could just as easily have bitten the dog on the leg or the butt. Scrotum, while not a “dirty” word, is not used in polite company.

    How ’bout this?

    clitorus clitorus clitorus

  2. GMC70
    Posted February 21, 2007 at 12:46 pm | Permalink

    Some of these folks complaining about this need to 1) choose not to read the book, and 2) pull up their big person panties, grow up, and get a life.

  3. Posted February 21, 2007 at 12:47 pm | Permalink

    Would they have rather the book said penis? Or balls? Or what? This is kind of crazy. I would understand the controversy if this book was for 6 year olds but we’re talking 12 year olds. I think they need to get a life…

  4. fleettwood
    Posted February 21, 2007 at 12:47 pm | Permalink

    “get a life.” Check mark for GMC

  5. fleettwood
    Posted February 21, 2007 at 12:52 pm | Permalink

    “they need to get a life…”And another one.

  6. GMC70
    Posted February 21, 2007 at 1:00 pm | Permalink

    “Check mark for GMC”

    What exactly does that mean?

  7. fleettwood
    Posted February 21, 2007 at 1:02 pm | Permalink

    You use the dreaded “get a life”.

  8. fleettwood
    Posted February 21, 2007 at 1:07 pm | Permalink

    What’s next? “and what not?”

  9. Posted February 21, 2007 at 1:09 pm | Permalink

    It’s a part of the male body with a name, a purpose, a place. If the mystery was removed maybe we would all be less up-tight about our sexuality. Sure there are parts of our bodies that are more private but they aren’t shameful and they can be talked about. We don’t talk about many things with strangers. When was the last time you included trimming your toenails in conversation? Children can and should be taught what we keep more private.

    These librarians shouldn’t be working with children with their attitudes. This sends a completely wrong signal to these children and makes the scrotum seem like something that is secret and forbidden. I can tell you I would want to see, maybe touch and investigate that forbidden part of the body if I were a 9 – 12 year old girl. Why do we pass along our own discomforts to our children? Don’t we want their life to be without some of our trials?

  10. GMC70
    Posted February 21, 2007 at 1:09 pm | Permalink

    And the significance of that is, what, exactly?

    I understand precisely what “get a life” is shorthand for. Do you?

  11. fleettwood
    Posted February 21, 2007 at 1:12 pm | Permalink

    No, GMC, I don’t, please tell me.

  12. RD
    Posted February 21, 2007 at 1:19 pm | Permalink

    “clitorus clitorus clitorus”

    ::sigh:: Fleet, if you’re going to type “dirty words,” please, for hevean’s sake, spell them correctly.

    CLITORIS

    It could be there was a very good reason the author used that particular part of the anatomy for the dog bite. Could be it might be more lethal than, say, a bite on the leg? I don’t know for sure, but if someone thinks this is important, I’ll contact my friend, the head vet at the OKC zoo, and ask him. ;)

  13. Posted February 21, 2007 at 1:20 pm | Permalink

    Delorus Delorus Delorus

  14. Mrage
    Posted February 21, 2007 at 1:30 pm | Permalink

    I remember 6th grade in the 70’s, we had How Girls Grow, 50’s movie for the boys to watch. Girls in another room go to see How Boys Grow.

    Then a kid in my class started to blurt out words for female body parts to girls, making them cringe and get upset. I told him to shut up and ridiculed him for years what he did.

    It’s like Fleetwood today, blurt out the word for a female body part, can’t spell it.

    Probably can’t find it.

  15. TRACY
    Posted February 21, 2007 at 1:32 pm | Permalink

    WOW, Balls got his own thread!Scrotum is fine.Balzac is a nasty thing.

    Do you people let your kids use wikipedia regularly?They can learn some great human biology right there!http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erectionhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vagina

    After all, it is only information.(With close-up glossy color photographs, complete with arrows and labels!)

  16. TRACY
    Posted February 21, 2007 at 1:34 pm | Permalink

    MRAGE, fleety can take the vagina link.That will clearly edumacate him about the forbidden love-button.

  17. Frank
    Posted February 21, 2007 at 1:34 pm | Permalink

    Penis Vagina Penis Vagina…

    Yah… I really miss The Larry Sanders Show!

  18. Steven Davis
    Posted February 21, 2007 at 1:35 pm | Permalink

    Oh, oh,The Cons are starting to cannibalize each other. And since this thread is on the word scrotum, I just don’t want to think about that any more.

  19. GMC70
    Posted February 21, 2007 at 1:35 pm | Permalink

    Fleet:

    Please, get a life.

    There ya go; you can figure it out.

  20. Posted February 21, 2007 at 1:37 pm | Permalink

    Funny how Tracy posts the erection one first….First from his internet shortcuts I guess?

  21. TRACY
    Posted February 21, 2007 at 1:40 pm | Permalink

    Yeah SOB.EVERYTHING I post is funny.

    Like this:DIDN’T YOU USE TO POST UNDER ANOTHER NAME?hahaahahhhaaaaweeeeeeeeeeeweeeeeeeeeeeee!

  22. The Truth
    Posted February 21, 2007 at 1:40 pm | Permalink

    Truth be told, male sack – offensive; scrotum – not offensive.

  23. ksfarmgrrl
    Posted February 21, 2007 at 1:42 pm | Permalink

    The FORBIDDEN love button? Yikes! Forgotten more often than forbidden. heeheheheheheheheheh

    Dont get me started…..

  24. TRACY
    Posted February 21, 2007 at 1:57 pm | Permalink

    KFG, I don’t have a slang collection for that particular part of the female.Sorry.

  25. KSGolfnut
    Posted February 21, 2007 at 2:20 pm | Permalink

    “the little man in the boat”

  26. Vaughn Tolle
    Posted February 21, 2007 at 2:22 pm | Permalink

    To answer the question posed: no.

  27. Jesus Freak
    Posted February 21, 2007 at 2:23 pm | Permalink

    If a snake bit me on the scrotum, would you suck out the poison for me?

  28. KSGolfnut
    Posted February 21, 2007 at 2:25 pm | Permalink

    And, Tracy -Thanks for noting that I DID get my own thread. It’s an honor, and I thank each of you for posting kindly and gently. And *I* personally celebrated this thread by reaching down and discretely attending to that one nagging itch that has been bugging me all day (damned new boxer briefs).

    =)

  29. fleettwood
    Posted February 21, 2007 at 2:29 pm | Permalink

    I think the point is not that scrotum is “dirty” but it’s not necessary. The accusation of being shock jock like is the only real “bone” of contention. Being the upstanding Libertarian type, I would leave it up to each libarian to stock it and each parent to allow it for their children, and what not.

  30. fleettwood
    Posted February 21, 2007 at 2:30 pm | Permalink

    Jesus freak- You gonna die.

  31. Wiseman
    Posted February 21, 2007 at 2:38 pm | Permalink

    When I have seen this topic two words came to mind “EMOTIONAL MATURITY”.

  32. rm6046
    Posted February 21, 2007 at 2:53 pm | Permalink

    Jesus Christ, Randy, this is so not newsworthy. What shocked me was getting to the end and finding out you wrote it. I would have sworn it was Rhonda, just because she was getting off on typing the “word”.

  33. Wiseman
    Posted February 21, 2007 at 2:57 pm | Permalink

    “The problem is that God gives men a brain and a penis, and onlyenough blood to run one at a time.”

  34. TRACY
    Posted February 21, 2007 at 3:10 pm | Permalink

    Balls, I forgot about the boat.Thanks.

  35. rm6046
    Posted February 21, 2007 at 3:10 pm | Permalink

    And, TBW, Randy, “scrotum” is as You state, a precise term, but not “neutral”. By definition, “scrotum” is quite gender specific.

  36. RD
    Posted February 21, 2007 at 3:34 pm | Permalink

    “The problem is that God gives men a brain and a penis, and onlyenough blood to run one at a time.”

    Amen. A testament to the current posts on this blog. Mention anything connected to sex, and the entire conversation takes a nosedive.

    (We ladies refer to Wiseman’s quote as “The big head and the little head theory.”)

  37. Posted February 21, 2007 at 3:44 pm | Permalink

    “Clitorus” this is a chorus singing the praises of a clitoris . . . maybe . . .

  38. J R
    Posted February 21, 2007 at 3:47 pm | Permalink

    Whoa folks we got two for the price of one here.

    The B logs D umbest P oster , fleettwood is upset about the reference to “naughty bits” and at the same time demostrating the very juvenile behavior such thinking generates in others.

    Geez fleetie and tight ass librarians. GROW UP.

  39. fleettwood
    Posted February 21, 2007 at 3:49 pm | Permalink

    “…the entire conversation takes a nosedive.”

    Now we’re talkin’!

  40. Posted February 21, 2007 at 3:53 pm | Permalink

    Sure, it’s a technical name of a body part – but so what? It’s probably not appropriate in a child’s book that is not based upon health.

    But it’s not that big of a deal either.

  41. fleettwood
    Posted February 21, 2007 at 4:00 pm | Permalink

    “I think the point is not that scrotum is “dirty” but it’s not necessary.”

    junior- I’m not upset, are you OK?

  42. RD
    Posted February 21, 2007 at 7:22 pm | Permalink

    Again, it depends on the context in which it was used.

    I’m sure we’ll see this book on the Banned Books list in September/October.

    I wonder if these librarians understand that the more you tell a middle reader (that’s the approriate term for that age group) that they CANNOT read a certain book, that’s the book that’s checked out all the time.

  43. political_mom
    Posted February 21, 2007 at 7:34 pm | Permalink

    Do we actually live in 2007 or are we in some alternate 1780’s flashback?

    This reminds me of the “hoohaw monologues”.

    SOB posted about Delores….and interestingly so does Fleets. It’s the one thing I get from enema, a reference to Jerry Seinfeld’s show.

    I can hear it now, all the little fundie kids asking mom and dad “what’s a scrotum”…and them freaking out.

    LOL Testicles (I get to call you that for this thread only :P) I laughed out loud at your little man in the boat. Don’t forget the boat!

  44. Jed
    Posted February 21, 2007 at 8:26 pm | Permalink

    Reminds me of the James Joyce novel “Finnegan’s Wake,” which was banned for a while by U.S. Customs because it contained the “F” word, not once, but four times! Of course anyone dumb enough to go looking for the word would immediately find that it’s one of the most difficult books in the English language to read. It’s also one of the most influential.

  45. fleettwood
    Posted February 21, 2007 at 8:35 pm | Permalink

    jed-Perhaps you could get a job as an intern at the Eagle. I hear they pay well.

  46. KSGolfnut
    Posted February 21, 2007 at 8:51 pm | Permalink

    Pmom,You can call me testicles, balls, testes, nuts, scrote, scrotum-breath or cream-filled-sac-o-love if you like.

    I’m impervious to name calling.

  47. Jed
    Posted February 21, 2007 at 8:52 pm | Permalink

    Flint,I did that number about 35 years ago, thank you. And no, they didn’t pay well!

  48. fleettwood
    Posted February 21, 2007 at 8:57 pm | Permalink

    jed-But wouldn’t you agree that internships are an excellent way for young people to learn a skill?

  49. Posted February 21, 2007 at 10:37 pm | Permalink

    “The problem is that God gives men a brain and a penis, and onlyenough blood to run one at a time.”True. But at least he gave us a brain, which is something he forgot to give women.

  50. political_mom
    Posted February 21, 2007 at 10:41 pm | Permalink

    Cream filled sac o’ love? EW!

    Sounds like sandman wishes he had a woman.

  51. Posted February 21, 2007 at 11:04 pm | Permalink

    “Sounds like sandman wishes he had a woman.-Already have a wonderful one with a better sense of humor than you have.

    “Cream filled sac o’ love? EW!”Sounds like ‘political mom’ a serious case of scrotum envy.

  52. popup!
    Posted February 21, 2007 at 11:10 pm | Permalink

    “SandMan” = KSGolfnut

  53. Posted February 21, 2007 at 11:17 pm | Permalink

    “SandMan” = KSGolfnut

    KSGolfnut???

    That’s too cryptic, too cerebral for me…remember that we males don’t have enough blood circulating properly operate our brains.

  54. Jed
    Posted February 21, 2007 at 11:38 pm | Permalink

    Actually, internships are mostly a good way for companies to get the gruntwork done for cheap.I wasn’t an intern, I was a teletype operator, and the skills I learned on the job have been obsolete for more than a couple decades. I did put my free time there to good use though, and learned quite a bit from other employees, not that management was too pleased.

  55. Jed
    Posted February 21, 2007 at 11:38 pm | Permalink

    Actually, internships are mostly a good way for companies to get the gruntwork done for cheap.I wasn’t an intern, I was a teletype operator, and the skills I learned on the job have been obsolete for more than a couple decades. I did put my free time there to good use though, and learned quite a bit from other employees, not that management was too pleased.

  56. political_mom
    Posted February 21, 2007 at 11:40 pm | Permalink

    Yes, please, I do so want two crumpled up hairy prunes between my legs to sweat and scratch too. Oh please can I can I?

  57. political_mom
    Posted February 21, 2007 at 11:45 pm | Permalink

    Only then could I quote my idol, Eric Cartman…

    “Suck mah balls, b*tch”.

  58. Posted February 21, 2007 at 11:45 pm | Permalink

    “Yes, please, I do so want two crumpled up hairy prunes between my legs to sweat and scratch too. Oh please can I can I?”

    If that’s the best you can do, then I’m turning in for the night. Got get my beauty rest so I can wake up ready scratch!

    Well, good night gang. You’re all in my dreams.

  59. RD
    Posted February 22, 2007 at 12:46 am | Permalink

    Sandman/Golfnutz, you need to get that itching problem attended to. Jock itch is hazardous to your health.

  60. RD
    Posted February 22, 2007 at 12:48 am | Permalink

    If Sandman/Golfnutz sees us in his dreams, he’ll be holding that prized possession of his in his hands (no that that’s unusual), while running from the knives we’re carrying.

    You HAVE been circumcized, right, SM/GN? If not, we can obliged you, whether in your dreams or…

  61. political_mom
    Posted February 22, 2007 at 10:01 am | Permalink

    I’m sure they’d make a lovely set of earrings.

    SNip snip.

  62. TRACY
    Posted February 22, 2007 at 10:27 am | Permalink

    Polmom,what about a SILK PURSE?

  63. brian
    Posted February 22, 2007 at 5:55 pm | Permalink

    Ah, the lovely prudism and hypocrisy of conservatives in America.Scrotum is a bad word, and public institutions should not allow adolescents to be exposed to words like that.On the other hand, there are no qualms about send troops to foreign lands to kill. And reporting it on the news where kids of all ages are exposed to it.

  64. brian
    Posted February 22, 2007 at 6:01 pm | Permalink

    Can someone help me understand this?Bible thumpers get worked up when a proper scientific name for a body part appears in a book at school, but you never hear them throwing a fit about violence on television or real violence in any number of places around the world (Iraq, Africa, etc.) or about helping those less fortunate that cannot help themselves.The Bible has a lot to say against violence and killing. And a lot more to say about loving everyone, especially ‘the least of those among us.’ To my knowledge there is nothing in the Bible about not saying scrotum, or any other word aside from the name of God. This seems like a real inconsistency.

  65. political_mom
    Posted February 22, 2007 at 7:34 pm | Permalink

    Don’t forget the new killing for God video games. That’s awesome!

    Can’t watch war on the tv, but we can send our sons to live it.

    And now this interesting related story: They’re looking to ban bull balls from vehicles.

    http://www.kansas.com/mld/kansas/16760615.htm