do any of them spend mass amounts of money trying to STOP a case from going to court.

i know of innocent people spending mass amounts in defense.

and they won -and even pressed for false arrest -maybe he is innocent – but all the hubbub isnt helping his cause.

sounds likt the odds for a sure win for you are a lot better than roulette.

- and if everyone really thinks tiller is clean.- and everyone thinks Kline has nothing and is just a boof.

even vegas would place odds better than roulette.

yes – ANYONE WITH BRAINS – that breaks the law… would be afraid of court.

well then… back to my earlier suggestion…

TWO judges actually review the evidence and find probable cause.

ONE judge doesnt even ask to review the evidence – dismisses the case – claiming procedural error (the supreme court opinion still out on that)

2 to 1 say there is a case…

lets say it is a tie…

let the court decide.

IF there is no case, then Kline gets laughed out of courtandTiller wonders why he spent 1/2 million trying to battle against something that isnt there…

Some people are very afraid of letting this make its day in court.

why is that?what is to be afraid of?

either way the right to an abortion stays.

It has been legal – it will be legal.

so raggin about anti-abortion is a farce.

what kind of people are afraid of the court?

As pointed out in the linked story, if all persons in possession of a small amount were to be charged with felonies, the District Court would be overwhelmed with cases; rather, if small amounts charged as residue possession, the Municipal Court can be utilized as well.

Angel, I suspect even if a State Trooper would charge possession a mile down the road (highly unlikely, as the WPD would confiscate the “residue” as evidence), a deal might be made with the DA to go forward with a misdemeanor residue charge, likely acceptable to the Judge to clear the docket.

Relationship to the Tiller case; none, really, other than a general relationship on the discretion issue, e.g., the AG wants to proceed, the local office doesn’t wish to. Many reasons could underlie this decision: lack of a case is one.

if a local cop decides not to charge you with possession then your free.

if a state trooper stops you 1mile down the road and decides to charge you possession, then busted.

the point of difference is in who decides to file charges or not.

but there is nothing a judge can do if the police departments – in their counties – have their own regulations on what they will define as possession.

so if no arrest, then no issue.

if there is an arrest – then felony.

“The law is very specific,” said police Lt. Scott Heimerman. “Possession is possession.”"

GMC? You out there? Any other legal eagle types?

that would be correct – if the case delt with a law specific to sedgwick county.

but tiller is in question of a state law.

“This is a local jurisdiction issue,” he said.”

http://www.kansas.com/mld/kansas/news/16401458.htm

If that is the case there then it would seem to be the case with the Tiller accusations as well.

judges opinionAGs opinionDAs opinionJurys opinion

none matter.

put the light on the law.and accept the virdict – what ever it may be.

really? lets let it go to court.

I will accept the virdict…Will the OTHER side accept the virdict?

Everyone makes a decision – ask the INDEPENDENT Judge – will you let your daughter have a late-term or partial birth abortion…

looks like we’ll have to rule that judge out… he has a personal decision…

dosn’t matter what he chose…

He is either a baby killing senssless bastard.orHe is a extreme right wing personal agenda idiot.

Not true – you can still get a LEAGAL abortion at any current abortion center performing LEGAL abortions.

the virdict on this case wont change current abortion law. it will REMAIN LEGAL TO GET A LEGAL ABORTION.

Sadly, I doubt that will happen and we will continue with “he said she said” …