Open thread on State of Union

256 Comments

  1. Joe Williams
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 7:28 pm | Permalink

    President Bush is basically Humpty Dumpty. And he just fell off the wall.

  2. steve
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 7:34 pm | Permalink

    Thank God for Cable!

  3. casey
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 7:44 pm | Permalink

    I say set up a perimiter and shoot him in the thigh.

  4. mrcontroversy
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 7:46 pm | Permalink

    Participating in this blog will be a logistical feat…the only working internet in my hotel is in the restaurant, two floors down from my room… but CNN International is on, and I’m locked and loaded.My first night here, we went to a comedy club. There were two Americans in the audience–some guy from Texas, and yours truly.The comic asked the other guy if he was a Republican or Democrat, and he said “Republican”.The comic said, “I see I’m going to have to simplify my jokes”.I, of course, replied “Democrat”.The comic said, “thank you, sir”… and never said another word to me all night.

  5. JWink
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 7:53 pm | Permalink

    Mr. C: So you’re still in the P’s. Mr. Barfield is taking your place this evening and doing an excellent job. Better get back!

  6. WSClark
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 7:53 pm | Permalink

    The Fan has been started, the Feces are being loaded, Bush is about to take the Podium, the World waits for the Fool on the Hill.

    Any bets how long it will take him to mention 9/11?

  7. ksfarmgrrl
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 7:54 pm | Permalink

    Hi Mr. C–Hope you are having a great time!

  8. Ben Huie
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 7:55 pm | Permalink

    WSC – 6 minutes.

    Will he bring up his ‘health benefit tax hike’?

  9. ksfarmgrrl
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 7:55 pm | Permalink

    I dont know Clark, but we should start drinking as soon as he does

  10. Siouxie
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 7:56 pm | Permalink

    Booger!!!

  11. J R
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 7:56 pm | Permalink

    He’ll mention “war on terror” within 3 minutes.

  12. CJvisits
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 7:57 pm | Permalink

    Just a visitor from Florida, pulling up a chair.

  13. WSClark
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 7:58 pm | Permalink

    The Clean Air Initiative, No Child Left Behind, blah, blah……

    What he says is the opposite of what he says…….

  14. WSClark
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 7:59 pm | Permalink

    I am one up on you Farm Grrl! I needed a drink just thinking about another Bush State of the Union!

  15. Ben Huie
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 7:59 pm | Permalink

    welcome barryites – but you should have to pay rent!

    leaving until after the aggress … have CARS going downstairs for the kids …

  16. WSClark
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:01 pm | Permalink

    Oh, my God!!!! The Speaker of the House is a WOMAN!!!!!!

    Hell has frozen over!!!!!

    Thank God for Democracy.

  17. CJvisit
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:03 pm | Permalink

    If it’s to be a drinking game, I suggest ’security.’ Between foreign and domestic, I take 12 uses for my pool number.

  18. Rage
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:04 pm | Permalink

    Dammit, Walker, the Food Channel isn’t carrying it this year. . .

  19. fleettwood
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:06 pm | Permalink

    I hope you people have laid out the plastic sheeting while you mess yourselves with glee.America dislikers.Does that sound better?

  20. GaryC.
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:07 pm | Permalink

    President Bush deserves nobodys attention or respect

  21. CJvisit
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:09 pm | Permalink

    Easy, now. You might be surprised by the breadth of opinion that seems to be here.

  22. writerdog
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:11 pm | Permalink

    And as usual, the two people that I am in personal contact who proudly stated in 2004 that they voted for G.W. re-election. And could not understand why I did not. Both said they would not be watching the SOTU address!

  23. Ben Huie
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:12 pm | Permalink

    As they file in I wonder – who is the designated survivor? (And who gere knows what I mean by that?)

  24. WSClark
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:12 pm | Permalink

    Why does Bush always look like he has some sort of bowel blockage issue going on?

  25. WSClark
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:13 pm | Permalink

    The survivor this year is – Gonzales!

  26. CJvisit
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:16 pm | Permalink

    Ben: Yep.

    WS: I think you’re right!

  27. J R
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:17 pm | Permalink

    I wouldn’t cross the street to work with this bum!

  28. mrcontroversy
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:17 pm | Permalink

    Going upstairs now… think the Republicans will still be hooting like they’re at a strip club like they did last year?

  29. ksfarmgrrl
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:17 pm | Permalink

    Welcome barrybloggers! Good to see you.

  30. writerdog
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:18 pm | Permalink

    He sounds like a Republican…wonder who told him what to say?

  31. JWink
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:18 pm | Permalink

    Madame Speaker!

  32. J R
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:19 pm | Permalink

    The ecomomy is in good shape?

    We can balance the budget without rasing taxes?

    Sheesh they must NEVER let this clown out!

  33. ksfarmgrrl
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:19 pm | Permalink

    Big eye roll. After he ran up the deficit, NOW he wants to balance the budget?

  34. writerdog
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:19 pm | Permalink

    K?

  35. ksfarmgrrl
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:20 pm | Permalink

    Yeah Wink, she looks good up there doesnt she.

  36. J R
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:20 pm | Permalink

    Oh NOW you wanna address earmarks?

    Yeah after your party is outta power!

  37. ksfarmgrrl
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:21 pm | Permalink

    Uh oh, here comes the social security gutting….

  38. WSClark
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:22 pm | Permalink

    Christ, does this man have no shame?

  39. writerdog
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:22 pm | Permalink

    Yeah Paris Hilton has shown a better grasp of fiscal responsibility

  40. writerdog
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:24 pm | Permalink

    BRIGHT SHINY OBJECTS!!!!! BRIGHT SHINY OBJECTS!!! pay no attention the the man behind the certain!

  41. WSClark
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:24 pm | Permalink

    Bend over….. here it comes…..

  42. J R
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:24 pm | Permalink

    Why should they reauthorize NCLB? YOU won’t fund it!

  43. ksfarmgrrl
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:24 pm | Permalink

    the health benefit tax?

  44. gster
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:25 pm | Permalink

    I’m still not watchng… you guys can have my proxy to get nauseated!

  45. writerdog
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:27 pm | Permalink

    Sure farmgirl if you take the money you already do not have and place it in a saving account. you get a tax break….you will not pay any tax on it till the end of the tax year

  46. J R
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:27 pm | Permalink

    Here comes amnesty!

  47. WSClark
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:27 pm | Permalink

    Jeez, there is a eight THOUSAND pound gorilla in the room – when is the son-of-a-bitch going to notice?

  48. writerdog
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:28 pm | Permalink

    You know a teihrt tax break!

  49. ksfarmgrrl
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:28 pm | Permalink

    hee hee dog

  50. WSClark
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:28 pm | Permalink

    Bullshit alert! Bullshit alert!

  51. political_mom
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:29 pm | Permalink

    without amnesty??? did he just flip flop?

  52. J R
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:29 pm | Permalink

    Can you even SPELL “deportation” you idiot?

  53. WSClark
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:29 pm | Permalink

    Yeah, P Mom, that is what he did…..

  54. writerdog
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:30 pm | Permalink

    No he did not flip he was thinking of another word.

  55. political_mom
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:31 pm | Permalink

    HEY ALRIGHT! He gets it that we need to find new ways for energy not just guzzling oil.

  56. KSGolfnut
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:31 pm | Permalink

    So far….great speech. Very bipartisan. However, no matter WHAT he says, the dims are going to hate it.

    DA <– perpetually proving my point.

  57. political_mom
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:31 pm | Permalink

    He almost sounds like a democrat huh?

  58. writerdog
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:32 pm | Permalink

    take everyone’s car away and give them to Haliburton!

  59. KSGolfnut
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:33 pm | Permalink

    Pelosi looks like she needs a suppository.

  60. J R
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:34 pm | Permalink

    Why ask them to appoint your judges when you sneak them in anyway?

  61. writerdog
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:34 pm | Permalink

    Notice Cheney takes a drink of water…. Bush takes a drink of water! LoL

  62. JWink
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:35 pm | Permalink

    Bush just did away with our Kansas drinking water in favor of producing more ethanol to reduce our dependence on foreign oil. So now we will be dependent on importing foreign drinking water.

  63. political_mom
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:35 pm | Permalink

    Damn it’s nice to see a woman up there in power.

    And a democrat!

  64. WSClark
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:35 pm | Permalink

    Nine Eleven – Twenty Four minutes – a new record for GWB!

  65. political_mom
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:36 pm | Permalink

    9/11…this war…

    he STILL keeps trying to make connections.

  66. J R
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:38 pm | Permalink

    Jeb is not gonna let you drill off Florida!

  67. political_mom
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:39 pm | Permalink

    How dare he bring up Osama Bin Laden, when HE CHOSE TO GO AFTER SADDAM INSTEAD.

    Grrr.

    He was the one who said Osama was no longer a threat.

  68. J R
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:41 pm | Permalink

    Yeah? Well how about we quit doing stuff that pisses people off at us?

    The great quesiton is “How long will you let me keep making Halliburton rich?”

  69. political_mom
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:41 pm | Permalink

    hey Wichita Eagle, you couldn’t have turned off the dang spam checker for tonight? Everything I type has to be a pain in the butt!

    Sounds like he’s talking about right wing American zealots when he describes terrorists.

  70. Visitor from Dave BarryLand
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:42 pm | Permalink

    I’m not a fan of Dubya, to say the least, and I stopped watching after his opening remarks. I just wanted to see how he’d handle the Pelosi *ya know she’s a woman* thing, and I thought he did pretty well. He turned into Frat Boy George with Charm, but he said what he did with respect, IMO, or am I just blowing smoke up my own ass???

  71. writerdog
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:45 pm | Permalink

    What choice did he have, if not he would have pissed off a good number of women…Well maybe not Ann C. Of course she is a woman in name only!

  72. J R
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:45 pm | Permalink

    ” I didn’t break Iraq!”

    “Iraq broke Iraq!”

    “PLEASE let me attack Iran!”

    ‘Oh and here is why it will NEVER be over!”

  73. WSClark
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:45 pm | Permalink

    Yada, yada, yada…democratically elected governments, yada yada yada.

    What happened to the democratically elected governments of Lebanon, Venuzeula, Iran, etc?

    Oh, shit, that just means democratically elected governments that LOVE us!

    Including the DEMOCRATS in the USA.

  74. writerdog
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:47 pm | Permalink

    The last I knew Mr. President they set it up in Pakistan !

  75. Visitor from Dave BarryLand
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:48 pm | Permalink

    Is it over yet?

  76. political_mom
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:48 pm | Permalink

    Whose giving the democratic response?

  77. Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:49 pm | Permalink

    Mr C,how many times did you expect him to thank you. That did have that great party in the streets when they heard the democrats had taken both houses? They know the pressure will be off soon and they can bring their goons back instead of using them all in Ethiopia as they did today.

  78. mrcontroversy
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:50 pm | Permalink

    Here in Manila, every time they go to a closeup of the president, the local cable company starts running a crawl for vitamin supplements across his forehead.

  79. WSClark
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:51 pm | Permalink

    Jim Webb, who has a boy serving in Iraq, is going to give the Dems response – I heard that it is going to be kick ass…..

  80. Visitor from Dave BarryLand
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:51 pm | Permalink

    Webb, who you’ll recall got into a fight with Dubya when he said he had a son/nephew/something fighting in Iraq. A verbal fight.

    Webb won.

  81. J R
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:51 pm | Permalink

    “Remeber The only thing to fear is EVERYTHING!”

    I need a bigger army! I’ve got invasions to do!

  82. Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:52 pm | Permalink

    The response is going to be given by the Senator whose son is serving in Iraq and about whom there was a flap because he skipped a reception line with W in it last month. Can’t think of his name right now.

    Sorry I’m late; there was a long line at the liquor store.

  83. Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:52 pm | Permalink

    Former Reagan Navy Secretary, freshly elected Senator Jim Webb (D-VA) will be delivering the Democratic response to President Bush’s State of the Union speech.

  84. writerdog
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:52 pm | Permalink

    It appears my resident Bush support could not find anything else on TV. She is stomping around the house Pissed. Hee

  85. Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:52 pm | Permalink

    JR who did Clinton make angry because the terrorists were sure active when he was in office, embassies, world trade center, aircraft carriers, barracks, etc…

    I think you get the idea. Just what did Clinton do to make the terrorists so mad? Maybe he could apologize.

  86. mrcontroversy
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:53 pm | Permalink

    Has anybody else noticed that Cheney and Bush always sip water SIMULTANEOUSLY?Scary.

  87. WSClark
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:53 pm | Permalink

    Germie – can you get a translator for your posts?

    An English translator?

  88. J R
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:53 pm | Permalink

    A civilian force to deploy abroad?

    Uh yeah that was sorta what the National Guard was supposed to be.

    Any body in a hurry to signup?

  89. political_mom
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:53 pm | Permalink

    Wait, the UN doing something good? I thought repubs hated the UN?

  90. Nicki
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:54 pm | Permalink

    Civilian corp? Isn’t that what the reserves is, but he’s taking it over for his stupid standbox oil war? Such crap! More violence, more fear, that’s all he’s good for. Impeach him and Cheney now, it’s the only hope we have.

  91. Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:54 pm | Permalink

    Webb! That’s right.

    Oh, Dafur got a mention this year.

  92. political_mom
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:55 pm | Permalink

    YAY, DARFUR…but won’t that be a conflict of interest with Bush’s intel buddies?

  93. Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:55 pm | Permalink

    Cheney sure looks pissed each time Nancy shoots up outta her chair and he has to lumber up (again).

  94. Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:55 pm | Permalink

    You big readers surely remember Webb. He is the one who wrote the literary novel about customs in the Phillipines that the Phillipinos knew nothing about.

  95. political_mom
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:55 pm | Permalink

    Sure, Aids….but birth control, hell NO.

  96. WSClark
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:57 pm | Permalink

    Christ, P Mom, don’t ya know that you can’t get AIDS if you don’t F!@#E$R%^&*(?

    Even a doper like me knows that…..

  97. Mr Kia
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:57 pm | Permalink

    I don’t see Pelosi eating any lemons but her face sure looks sour.

  98. political_mom
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:57 pm | Permalink

    Yeah the world thinks we’re great…so great Manilla puts ads on Bush’s head!

  99. Nicki
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:57 pm | Permalink

    Yeah, no birth control and we are gonna make sure that you get a nice tax deduction so that you can afford health care, um….if someone can’t afford it now having it taken out of their monthly budget, how is this going to help?

    Dikembe Mutumbo??? WTF!

  100. mrcontroversy
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:59 pm | Permalink

    Depends on what part of the Phils he was talking about.Gotta remember, there are 7000 islands here…lots of regional differences, sort of like the U.S. before the advent of mass communications.

  101. political_mom
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 8:59 pm | Permalink

    He’s talking about Baby Einstein and NBA stars? WTH?

  102. mr kia
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:00 pm | Permalink

    Do you understand what a tax deduction is?

  103. J R
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:01 pm | Permalink

    “LOOK A basketball player and a baby sitter who made it! Look at all the opportunity!”

  104. political_mom
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:04 pm | Permalink

    What channel ya’ll watching, I’m on MSNBC.

  105. Nicki
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:05 pm | Permalink

    Yes I do understand what a tax deduction is, for the people that will qualify for this deduction, they will get money back in refunds…that doesn’t help them on their week to week paychecks which is where the issue is on health care. Not to mention the fact that some speculation has been that income that is paid in health care premiums straight out of your paycheck will now be taxable, which is not the case now. It’s a joke, just like HSA, if you don’t have the money to start with it’s not going to help you.

  106. writerdog
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:05 pm | Permalink

    Do not get me wrong, these people are to be admired for what they have done. But to me they are being used as nothing more then more bright, shiny objects.

  107. KSGolfnut
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:05 pm | Permalink

    I’ve seen just about every major speech Bush has ever given – and this is one of the best. Very insightful. Very bipartisan. Very passionate.

    And moving. The story about the hero in Iraq – wow.

    Now, will the democrats have an equally optimistic and can-do approach? We’ll see…

  108. Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:05 pm | Permalink

    He told his advisors he was going to be sober tonight? (as stated by Brian Williams on NBC)

    Has that been a problem???

  109. Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:06 pm | Permalink

    I think McCain is playing tetris on his blackberry.

  110. KSGolfnut
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:06 pm | Permalink

    I don’t ever allow my TV to tune to PMSNBC

  111. Ben Huie
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:06 pm | Permalink

    Excellent speech IMO. He hit a lot of good points domestically and expanded the WOT into alQuada attacks prevented. I think he will get about a 5 point bump in the polls.

    Some questions though: where has he been for the last 6 years on oil? Fuel economy? Health care? Deficit? So many things that should have been done long ago.

    But – a good and well-delivered speech.

    Also – a very good beginning “Madame Speaker”

  112. J R
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:06 pm | Permalink

    I’ll be back after Webb’s response.

    I want to give IT my undivided.

  113. political_mom
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:07 pm | Permalink

    I liked the energy talk, and I liked the Darfur thing, but I doubt he’ll deliver.

    The Iraq sounded same ole same ole, and it REALLY made me angry when he brought up Osama.

    The soldier, yep, he’ll be a Senator someday. And he deserves it.

  114. Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:08 pm | Permalink

    I am sorry. I still can’t watch Bush talk. Something is on tape delay, and it ain’t the satellite feed.

  115. writerdog
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:08 pm | Permalink

    golfnut now if only means what he said. Or like the last one is it nothing more then saying the words we all want to hear and he does not even believe his own words?

  116. KSGolfnut
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:10 pm | Permalink

    And he’s EXACTLY right about Iraq: we can’t afford to leave it undone.

  117. KSGolfnut
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:11 pm | Permalink

    writer, do you not get the then/than difference?

  118. political_mom
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:12 pm | Permalink

    IRAQ DOES NOT WANT US THERE. and him equating sunnis to alqaida…that’s likely not going to help the matter either.

  119. Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:12 pm | Permalink

    slyeyes – think about it. Drunks can go to rehab. Stupid is a way of life. Just ask Mark Foley.

  120. writerdog
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:12 pm | Permalink

    true, remember the pottery barn rule! By our actions we have played into the extremeists hands with Iraq.

  121. John Lewis
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:15 pm | Permalink

    IMPEACH THE CHIMP!www.impeachBush.org

  122. mrcontroversy
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:16 pm | Permalink

    On CNN International, they talked at length about how the Democrats were showing more respect to the president than the Republicans were, e.g., Dana Rohrbacher refusing to applaud.Did they talk about that there?

  123. Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:16 pm | Permalink

    Mr. Lewis, that wasn’t very nice. Perhaps you should go hunting with Mr. Cheney.

  124. steve
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:17 pm | Permalink

    All Bush was saying, is give War a Chance!

  125. political_mom
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:18 pm | Permalink

    Nope they didn’t mention it mrc.

    They talked about how gracious Bush was to Pelosi

  126. JM
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:18 pm | Permalink

    Time to spin useless spam like the libs did all during the SOTU

  127. Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:20 pm | Permalink

    Thought this was supposed to be a rebuttal (sp?) not just him talking about himself?

  128. Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:20 pm | Permalink

    “libs” – there are Liberians on this thread?!? Who knew?

  129. JM
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:21 pm | Permalink

    Someone get me some coffee quick! Webb is putting me to sleep!

  130. political_mom
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:22 pm | Permalink

    He’s dead on right about returning to the people who live in America.

    He’s dead on right about the war, the sacrifice.

  131. Visitor from Dave BarryLand
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:22 pm | Permalink

    Well, Tom Brokaw agreed with me re Dubya and the way he treated Pelosi. Brokaw said when he talked to W.H. aides earlier today he was told this was going to be the way it was handled.

  132. political_mom
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:23 pm | Permalink

    Can’t refute what Webb has to say JM?

  133. writerdog
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:23 pm | Permalink

    LOL golfnut is that the best you could do! Yes I understand the usage. But you are trying to argue the difference between someone yelling “Fire” and their yelling “Far” either way it is not the usage that is the matter. It is the understanding of the smoke and flames. If you wish to argue the usage. Than you will have to choose if you will run out or debate the misusage. But to understand its intent, then you will run.

  134. WSClark
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:23 pm | Permalink

    Webb’s rebutal is seriously kicking ass – it puts all the chicken hawk Repub cowards to shame!!!!

    Dems serve – Rebs talk about it.

  135. Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:24 pm | Permalink

    NBC was saying that traditionally, the speech is written by the party. Webb threw that one out and wrote his own.

    Sounds like he’s just wanting Bush to stick to his word.

    But I don’t know about the part where he cited Andrew Jackson. What he said was good, but Andrew Jackson?!?

  136. JM
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:25 pm | Permalink

    Refute want Webb has to say? I thought Charlie Brown was on…all I heard was “waaah waaah waaaah.”

  137. Ben Huie
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:26 pm | Permalink

    Good speech by Webb too. Not as flashy – no ‘props’ vailable. But short, straight, honest, and to the point.

    Let’s see the Republicans Swift-Boat him!

  138. KSGolfnut
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:26 pm | Permalink

    writerdog,you did it twice – that’s why i asked.

  139. Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:26 pm | Permalink

    Dave Barry for President.

    And you thought that was a humor blog.

  140. political_mom
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:27 pm | Permalink

    Now that’s truly sad JM, we all discussed the speech Bush gave…and you can’t even come back with a decent response.

    Typical neoCON.

  141. Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:27 pm | Permalink

    JM – you must have been watching the FOX network.

  142. writerdog
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:27 pm | Permalink

    I have to get off and attent to the Bush supporter in the house. She gets so testy during these times. Have so the last few years, Bush interrupts her TV shows!

    Yeah he bring out the best in her!! HEh Heh.

  143. Mr Kia
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:28 pm | Permalink

    Webb – “Dems and the GOP differ from how we view the current economy”

    Translation: If Republicans something good, it still sucks.

    That about says it all for the Democratic side no matter the subject.

  144. Nicki
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:28 pm | Permalink

    Jim Webb was great! I loved the “If he won’t, we will show him the way.” Awesome!

  145. KSGolfnut
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:30 pm | Permalink

    There really was no sense in watching the rebuttal speech. It’s just gonna be the same ol whiney BS, and Webb didn’t disappoint.

    However, he clearly lied when he said the “…majority of the military….”

    He’ll get called upon to support that data.

  146. Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:30 pm | Permalink

    Webb was sincere, and addressed the real issues that most affect our state of the union — the war in Iraq and the economy. He respectively asked THIS president to use good judgment.

  147. J R
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:30 pm | Permalink

    Webb’s speech was STELLAR!

    It was nice to hear something after that pap fest from bush.

    And WHO are those pie eyed yahoos who look like they are about to faint in bush’s presence? Morons.

  148. JM
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:31 pm | Permalink

    Yeah right PMom, seriously discussed Bushes speech. The Libs were oozing out their pre-SOTU mantra before there was any talking.

    And no people, I watched C-SPAN for the SOTU and CNN for Webb.

    Barak Obama is far easier to listen to and am listening to him right now.

  149. Nicki
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:31 pm | Permalink

    “For the first time, more troops disapprove of the president’s han dling of the war than approve of it. Barely one-third of service members approve of the way the president is handling the war, ac cording to the 2006 Military Times Poll.”

    Military times poll 12/29/06http://www.militarycity.com/polls/2006_main.php

  150. WSClark
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:32 pm | Permalink

    I read an article recently that said that if Bush killed and ate a baby, the Republican hardcore would still support him.

    Tonight’s State of the Union is proof that is true.

    If Bush ate their baby, the Republican supporters would still support the son-of-a-bitch.

    Work on them tinfoil hats, ‘pubs.

    F(*&^%$ ing losers!!!!

  151. political_mom
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:32 pm | Permalink

    He already has the data to support that statement.

    http://www.militarycity.com/polls/2006_main.php

  152. J R
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:33 pm | Permalink

    Like anybody cares about JMs opinion anyway.

    YO JM? You are late for a meltdown on a thread somewhere!

  153. political_mom
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:34 pm | Permalink

    LOL NIKKI.

    And Kia, the economy may be good for you, but nobody else feels it.

  154. Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:34 pm | Permalink

    Nice one, Nicki, but they’re obviously liars, too. Anyone who disagrees with the “American Way” is a liar.

    Kidding, kidding!Can’t we all just get a loon?

  155. Nicki
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:35 pm | Permalink

    We had that comment nailed, huh P Mom? LOL

  156. Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:37 pm | Permalink

    WS – that’s a bit gross. I thought many of the Repubs looked quite uncomfortable. They’ve been working for a guy who’s now an embarassment. That’s not where they thought they’d be. And last time I checked, they don’t allow tinfoil hats (or women) in the clubhouse.

  157. steve
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:38 pm | Permalink

    Don’t refute with facts, it’ll only confuse them!

  158. political_mom
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:38 pm | Permalink

    We already have a loon, his name is Bush.

    :D

  159. Mr Kia
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:38 pm | Permalink

    Democrat rule #2Liberal sources are always 100% reputable.Conservative never are.

  160. Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:39 pm | Permalink

    Oh come on Kia. OK fine, find another poll that says the troops love Bush right now.

  161. JM
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:39 pm | Permalink

    Okay J R, since you are getting personal… and this thread is about the SOTU, let me play by your and WS Clark’s rule of character assasination.

    Hey J R, what are you going to do when your cashed in 401K runs out?

    Get a job or go sleep under an underpass and then complain how no one has helped you?

    People do get jobs you know, even those with severe handicaps. What’s your excuse?

  162. Nicki
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:40 pm | Permalink

    Facts? We are still allowed to have those, right? They haven’t been outlawed by some signing statement or anything yet, right?

  163. Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:42 pm | Permalink

    JM it’s REALLY hard for people with even mind disabilities to get a job. You know all those ‘essential qualifications for the job’ often has language that specifically and legally allows them not to hire.

    And that whole ‘make reasonable accomodations’ … I was turned down for a job because they wouldn’t let me have a chair to sit.

  164. Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:42 pm | Permalink

    that was supposed to say “mild disabilities”.

  165. WSClark
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:43 pm | Permalink

    So, ……………. what’s your point JM?

    Is there apoint or is it just more lib bashing?

    Can we just skip the “alleged mature discussion” and you can go directly to the personal attacks?

    Notice that it is you that have already gone to personal attacks.

  166. steve
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:44 pm | Permalink

    Republicans pretty much did away with them, but they are starting to make a comeback.

  167. Mr Kia
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:44 pm | Permalink

    Enlighten me here Mom.How can only 50% of the country approve of the economy yet 70% say their household financial situation is “good”, “very good” or “excellent”?

    It’s because of the likes of your kind in the media constantly reporting nothing but negatives.

    http://americanresearchgroup.com/economy/

  168. KSGolfnut
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:46 pm | Permalink

    “…the economy may be good for you, but nobody else feels it.”

    Everyone I know feels it. The economy now is stronger than it was when Clinton was president. Our GDP is higher, the Dow is higher, unemployment is lower, interest rates are lower…

  169. steve
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:46 pm | Permalink

    They must not realize that the National Debt is partially theirs.

  170. Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:49 pm | Permalink

    steve – don’t be silly – it belongs to their grandkids.

  171. Nicki
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:50 pm | Permalink

    and their grandkids….lol

  172. KSGolfnut
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:51 pm | Permalink

    re: MilitaryCity.com

    since when is 42% a majority?

  173. Mr Kia
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:52 pm | Permalink

    When Ross Perot is in the election Golf :)

  174. Mary Caruso
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:52 pm | Permalink

    Turn about is fair play…JR makes a lot of assumptions and accusations about others who disagree with him. So far, he’s accused me of marrying money, investing in companies who set up shop in other countries and drain jobs away from Americans, living in an ivory tower completely removed from reality and hating the poor and the homeless…even though my life work is serving the underserved and others he probably wouldn’t touch with a ten foot pole. Maybe it’s time his use of personal attacks comes around to bite him in the ass.

  175. KSGolfnut
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:52 pm | Permalink

    the Dims never have been too good with math

  176. Visitor from Dave BarryLand
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:53 pm | Permalink

    Would that be 70% of the people who have an income over 1 million a year??

    C’mon…

  177. J R
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:55 pm | Permalink

    I work for me JM.

    BUT unlike Republicans? I don’t forget where I came from.

    ya know what bush came down to tonight?

    “Here are some good things the dems are gonna make me do so I may as well try and rehabilitate my legacy.”

  178. Nicki
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:55 pm | Permalink

    Well…Mr. Nut….”Only 35 percent of the military members polled this year said they approve of the way President Bush is handling the war, while 42 percent said they disapproved.”

    Obviously this does not add up to 100%, leaving most to believe that there were some soldiers that chose not to answer that question. So while only 42% disapproved, I think the more important number is the fact that only 35% approved. Do you honestly believe that soldiers approve of a strategy that requires them to be deployed and redeployed and then deployed again. Then they are stoplossed, then they are kept beyond the term of their deployment, they are basically held hostage so that they will re-up, do you think that is something they support?

  179. Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:55 pm | Permalink

    Mary C – sounds like you have quite a resume!

    speaking of drinking games…http://www.borowitzreport.com/

  180. Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:55 pm | Permalink

    JM, where I went to school, 42% was more than 35%.

    From the article, “Only 35 percent of the military members polled this year said they approve of the way President Bush is handling the war, while 42 percent said they disapproved. “

  181. WSClark
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:56 pm | Permalink

    The Repubs, like Golf, JM, KIA, and others do not give a good god damn about the deficit and the national debt……….

    The debt is just something that the poor saps that do not have the resources that ‘Pubs have will have to deal with…..

    The Republicans have theirs – and their thought is to hell with the rest of the country.

  182. KSGolfnut
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 9:57 pm | Permalink

    Jim Webb said:”The majority of the nation no longer supports the way this war is being fought; nor does the majority of our military”

    42% is not the majority of the military.

    Even for Dimocrats.

  183. Nicki
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 10:00 pm | Permalink

    “An overwhelming majority of 72% of American troops serving in Iraq think the U.S. should exit the country within the next year, and more than one in four say the troops should leave immediately, a new Le Moyne College/Zogby International survey shows.”

    http://www.zogby.com/NEWS/ReadNews.dbm?ID=1075

  184. Posted January 23, 2007 at 10:00 pm | Permalink

    Testicles:

    Only 35 percent of the military members polled this year said they approve of the way President Bush is handling the war, while 42 percent said they disapproved.

    42 is more than 35.

  185. Posted January 23, 2007 at 10:02 pm | Permalink

    OK, have it your way. 42% don’t approve; 23% couldn’t care enough to answer; and 35% approve.

    Do you like that math any better?

    Doesn’t look like the majority of the military exactly has his back.

  186. KSGolfnut
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 10:03 pm | Permalink

    Pee:I’ll type this extra slow for you:

    Jim Webb said:”The majority of the nation no longer supports the way this war is being fought; nor does the majority of our military”

    42% is not the majority of the military.

    Even for you.

  187. Mr Kia
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 10:04 pm | Permalink

    Rule #1 of money management:Don’t buy stuff you can’t afford.

    I don’t have much money in the bank, but I have zero debt besides my home.

    Wants mines because you don’t gots? That’s Socialism. There’s at least 3 countries off the top of my head operating under that economic theory.

  188. KSGolfnut
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 10:04 pm | Permalink

    Nicki,Typical liberal ploy. When you’ve lost the argument – change the subject!

  189. WSClark
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 10:05 pm | Permalink

    The Republicans would Monica Bush if he OFFERED them a tax cut, regardless of what it would do to the rest of the population. They don’t give a good god damned about the rest of the world or even the rest of the United States of America.

    But………. that is the Republican way.

  190. JM
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 10:07 pm | Permalink

    slyeyes,

    And when did I make a comment about such poll ratings? You have me confused with someone else?

  191. Nicki
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 10:07 pm | Permalink

    I’m not changing the subject….most logical people would understand that if the troops at a 72% clip believe they should be home in a year (last year by the way) then it would be rational to believe that they probably are not too happy with the current state of affairs. Just because the FACTS don’t jive with your narrow view of Republican rose colored crap doesn’t make it any less true.

  192. Posted January 23, 2007 at 10:07 pm | Permalink

    42% is a ‘relative majority’ aka a ‘plurality.’ In this case, a portion of the eligible voters may have been indisposed in bunkers in Iraq.

  193. Posted January 23, 2007 at 10:07 pm | Permalink

    Lets assume that the percent left out were ambivalent ok testicles?

    So that would be 42+35= 77% have a strong opinion for or against the war. That leaves 100-77= 23%.

    Now, between 23% undecided, 42% disagree, and 35% agree…which is the majority?

  194. KSGolfnut
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 10:09 pm | Permalink

    Pee,Obviously, math was not your strong subject.

    No matter how you slice it, 42% is not a majority.

  195. Posted January 23, 2007 at 10:09 pm | Permalink

    Lost argument?

    Change subject?

    Typical conservative ploy when losing; a refusal to accept reality.

  196. JM
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 10:11 pm | Permalink

    Must be a different military now.

    Could have sworn that the Commander in charge of us did not offer us a poll on what exactly it was we wanted to do.

    ROFL!

  197. KSGolfnut
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 10:12 pm | Permalink

    By definition, majority is greater than half.

  198. Nicki
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 10:13 pm | Permalink

    “Barely one in three service members approve of the way the president is handling the war, according to the new poll for the four papers (Army Times, Navy Times, Air Force Times and Marine Times). In another startling finding, only 41% now feel it was the right idea to go to war in Iraq in the first place.”

    http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003526245

    I’ll type it extra slow for you Mr. Nut….according to this poll BARELY 1/3 of troops polled agree with the President’s course! Now, help me out with my math here, being a dimocrat and all I might need you to hold my hand…. If 1/3 agree with the President and 2/3 disagree, who is the majority?

  199. WSClark
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 10:13 pm | Permalink

    So…………which one of you Republicans is lining up to Monica Bush right now?

    From this vantage point, it looks like there are a lot of ‘Pubs taking cuts.

    Pervs….

  200. Mr Kia
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 10:14 pm | Permalink

    Either you believe that Democracy in the middle east makes America and the World safer or you don’t.

    If you don’t, that’s fine. You’re wrong and it’s your right as an American.

  201. JM
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 10:14 pm | Permalink

    Hey KSGolfnut,

    I have 100 dollars I found.

    I’ll give you most of it.

    Here’s your 42 dollars.

    LOL

  202. Posted January 23, 2007 at 10:15 pm | Permalink

    Anything repeated at least 3 times must, by definition, be true. It’s true, it’s true, it’s true!

  203. Nicki
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 10:16 pm | Permalink

    Beetlejuice, beetlejuice, beetle….oh wait a minute…lol

  204. Posted January 23, 2007 at 10:17 pm | Permalink

    From dictionary.com:

    the amount by which the greater number, as of votes, surpasses the remainder (distinguished from plurality).

    When three or more choices are available, however, a distinction is made between majority and plurality. A majority, then, consists of more than one-half of all the votes cast, while a plurality is merely the number of votes one candidate receives in excess of the votes for the candidate with the next largest number.

    So you’re right, Testicles, in a way, the proper term should have been plurality.

  205. Mr Kia
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 10:18 pm | Permalink

    If you’re working, you got a cut. If you aren’t you are on welfare. The best “monica” the government can give you.

  206. Posted January 23, 2007 at 10:19 pm | Permalink

    Testicles likes to play with semantics.

  207. JM
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 10:19 pm | Permalink

    Nicki,

    Let me give you a clue about the AF,ARMY,NAVY and MIL Times. They are all civilian run newspapers. Anyone can subscribe to it, including civilians.

    It was that way 30+ years ago and that way now.

    First thing a military person learns that you can’t believe what is written in the AF,ARMY,NAVY, MIL times.

    Why you ask? Because they are not the official spokespeople for the DOD and get their information second hand, third hand and sources that can’t be identify.

    Anyone that uses those publications as a measuring stick probably never has served in the miiitary and doesn’t understand that most all veteran military members realize those publications are merely just reading material,nothing more.

    Oh yeah, and if you want to see your name on a promotion list. That’s the only reason I bought it. heh

  208. WSClark
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 10:20 pm | Permalink

    Testicles likes to play with what?

  209. Visitor from Dave BarryLand
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 10:22 pm | Permalink

    Looks to me like it’s easier for some to debate numbers than to talk about the issues.

    An equal ploy to changing the subject..

  210. KSGolfnut
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 10:22 pm | Permalink

    Pee,Of course I’m right.

    Nicki,You’ve never taken a statistics course (and passed), have you? I know this because no one who has would dare make the leap that you just made with the 1/3 vs. 2/3.

  211. Mr Kia
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 10:23 pm | Permalink

    And we’ve again digressed to liberals making homophobic remarks about conservatives.What an enlightened bunch

    With that I’m off to watch Simon Cowell humiliate some likely Kerry/Clinton/Obama supporters.Good night.

  212. Nicki
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 10:23 pm | Permalink

    There polls stipulate that it was TROOPS IN IRAQ being polled. I guess if it doesn’t come from Sean Hannity it can’t be credible. I’ve cited 3 sources that indicate a serious disapproval by the troops in harms way…what more do you want?

  213. Posted January 23, 2007 at 10:23 pm | Permalink

    70% is however a true majority- and you can’t dispute that.

    And 70% want out in the next year.

    That means they DO NOT support Bush’s plan.

  214. Nicki
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 10:23 pm | Permalink

    sorry that should be Their polls.

  215. KSGolfnut
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 10:24 pm | Permalink

    Face it, Jim Webb lied.

    The end.

  216. Posted January 23, 2007 at 10:26 pm | Permalink

    Sorry for both sides,

    Bush’s speech tonight was one very large load of crap, from his domestic to his foreign policy agenda.

    This was his night to appear as a uniter vs. a divider. He has never wanted to be the former, and continues to be the latter. When will you people get it???

    Time to stop his raid on middle class health benefits. Any Dem who doesn’t, should be defeated, post haste.

    Impeach this prick, ASAP!

  217. J R
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 10:28 pm | Permalink

    Webb’s words were 100% true.

    I liked especially that the wealthy were reminded of T Roosevelts time and the era of the robber barons.

  218. Dan
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 10:30 pm | Permalink

    So riddle me this JM… who do you believe? It’s nice for you to sit there and deflect what seem to be credible threats to your argument. Facts?!? Who needs em! Polls?!? Way too easy to fake! And all without having to throw out a shred of supporting evidence for your “idea” looks like somebody is tuned in to the conservative attack radio.

    And I’m sure KSGolfnut is running around waving his D- in Juco statistics and screaming about how his mommy put it up on the fridge for him…

    As far as I can see Nicki is the only one actually bothering to back up her claims with something other than smug comments and smart ass remarks…

    just my .02 dollars

  219. Posted January 23, 2007 at 10:30 pm | Permalink

    The end, the end, the end!I wouldn’t trust a DOD poll -Do you approve of Bush’s plan, or would you like to spend more time on the front line?

    Still, 42% is huge, considering these people are putting their lives on the line for our country. There’s a big difference between believing in your country and the democratic process, and having faith in a particular president.

  220. JM
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 10:33 pm | Permalink

    Dan,

    Okay fair enough. I’ll email my grandnephew who has been in Iraq two times and on his way over for a third time. I’ll ask him to ask his troops and people in his battalion if they have been polled about the war.

    I bet you will get an answer you won’t like. That is, the existence of such a poll is pure BS.

    But, I’ll check and get back to you.

  221. Glenn M. Cassel. AMH1(AW), USNavy, RETIRED
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 10:34 pm | Permalink

    SOTU:War, either you win or you loose. Which do you prefer.Response from the democrats:Jim Webb: I served when mr. webb was SecNav. He was pretty bad. But not as bad as CinC jimmy the dhimmi, carter was a graduate of the Naval Academy as was mr. webb. Neither had anhing that resembles character.Win or don’t win. Simple concept.FYI hillary clinton, nancy pelosi, chuck shcumer, et al are traitors and should reap a traitor’s reward.

  222. WSClark
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 10:38 pm | Permalink

    Hmmmmmmmmmmm… eh, Glenn, can you help us interpret your post?

  223. Posted January 23, 2007 at 10:38 pm | Permalink

    What’s the margin of error in a poll of one’s relatives?

  224. J R
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 10:38 pm | Permalink

    Yes well “Glenn”

    bush’s vision of victory is not remotely realistic.

  225. Visitor from Dave BarryLand
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 10:41 pm | Permalink

    People who disagree with the current administration are per se “traitors”?

    Familiar with “free speech”, or have you drank too much of the Cheney kool-aid?

  226. Dan
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 10:42 pm | Permalink

    JM you misunderstand me. When you have that poll in your hands and put it out for public consumption I will look at it with a TON of interest not automatically dismiss it as someone’s propaganda. Who are you to tell me what answer I would like? Do you know me? Just because I don’t understand how someone considers themselves fair and unbiased while disregarding chunks of data just because someone told them to never believe XYZ I’m a liberal now? And I suppose you’re going to tell me other things I believe too. But yes sir I’m against this war. Until you can convince me that the men and women in Iraq dying for our freedom aren’t being wasted in a frivolous war I will continue to be against it. I would think someone so concerned with the welfare of our fighting men and women would be a little less cavalier in regard to their fate.

  227. Posted January 23, 2007 at 10:45 pm | Permalink

    There is a lot of misdirected anger on this thread. Are you venting because life has been unfair? Wouldn’t it be better to argue the high ground and perhaps influence a few undecided to join your cause? Therapy ain’t just for hippies anymore.

  228. Nicki
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 10:45 pm | Permalink

    Well, I guess by those definitions the majority of the American people are traitors as well…

  229. Nicki
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 10:46 pm | Permalink

    lol Annie, maybe the blog could get a group discount!

  230. Posted January 23, 2007 at 10:48 pm | Permalink

    Well said, ’slyeyes,’ ‘visitor,’ and Dan!

    pssst… a few of you others are cussing at your monitor. Don’t forget – I’ve got my tinfoil hat on, so I can seeeee you!

  231. political_mom
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 10:49 pm | Permalink

    I would say anyone who advocates sending soldiers into an immoral war is a traitor to the constitution of the United States.

  232. Posted January 23, 2007 at 10:54 pm | Permalink

    Holy Mackeral, did Bush suck or what?

    Once the middle class understands that he’s going to tax medical benefits as “income,” the RepubliCONS are toast.

    Well, they already were toast but Bush just turned the burner on max hot.

    Worst. President. Ever.

  233. JM
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 10:59 pm | Permalink

    Dan,

    Okay. Didn’t realize you were going to get all in a huff about me verifying that polls were done in Iraq by asking actual soldiers in Iraq if they have ever been polled.

    Nevermind then fellow, believe what you want to believe. Your chance for first source information just flew out the window.

  234. Posted January 23, 2007 at 11:01 pm | Permalink

    Those are your facts to support your position? Phone-a-friend?

  235. Posted January 23, 2007 at 11:01 pm | Permalink

    Okay, thanks, Glenn.

    We wondered who the simple minded Bush “dead enders” are who support a failed policy.

    Now we know.

    Maybe you could enlighten us all on why the British with the most powerful military in the world in the 18th-19th century were defeated by Americans (twice). Why did the French lose Indo-china and Algeria? Why can’t Israel ever “win” over Palestine? Why did America lose in Vietnam? The Soviet Union in Afghanistan?

    And why haven’t we won in Iraq in four year and 2 billion dollars a week?

    Because of Nancy Pelosi, Glenn?

  236. Posted January 23, 2007 at 11:02 pm | Permalink

    drizzle, drazzle, druzzle drone.

    Time for this one to go home.

    Annie, catch you later at the bar. I’ll start a tab.

  237. Dan
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 11:13 pm | Permalink

    JM,

    Who’s in a huff? I told you I would be grateful for that type of information. It’s your presumption of the answer which I prefer that I have an issue with. Do you honestly think that I WANT the troops to be miserable? If you do, I’m sorry. I think you would agree with me (and most troops would) that the men and women we’re talking about would be better off here at home with their families. Making that our number one goal. But consider this… If we have the luxury of sitting around wondering if we should be in Iraq fighting does it really stand to reason that we HAVE to be? Is this the war we were sold? Is this as necessary as we were told it was? In my humble opinion these questions aren’t treason, they’re intelligence.

  238. Visitor from Dave BarryLand
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 11:15 pm | Permalink

    I’ll be there too, order me a JD sly, OK?

  239. Posted January 23, 2007 at 11:17 pm | Permalink

    Check out JM.

    This is the inDUHvidual who got all huffy because a serving soldier in Iraq called him a “dumbass.”

    (JM had warned the kid not to post stuff critical of the war because of who could be “watching.”)

    But ole JM doesn’t have a bit of a problem cat-calling the former Secretary of the Navy.

    He also has no pangs of conscience catching those tax-payer funded checks the government sends him, even though he’s all against gov’t aid for actual poor people.

  240. Posted January 23, 2007 at 11:18 pm | Permalink

    political mom – good point.btw – I asked my brother, an officer in the Air Force Reserve. He believes in our country 100%. Bush and his war? Not so much. “Not so much” is quite short of a majority. So now we have our ‘first source information.’ Support our troups – bring them home. I’ll buy them a drink at the bar. Bush? Not so much.

  241. Posted January 23, 2007 at 11:20 pm | Permalink

    Dan–

    Remember Donald Rumsfailed saying “how long will we be in Iraq? Could be six days, six weeks . . . I doubt six months.”

    Yeah, that was close. Six months plus another four to six years or more.

  242. Posted January 23, 2007 at 11:22 pm | Permalink

    Good job, Annie.

  243. Mr Kia
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 11:24 pm | Permalink

    I have a cousin is in the Army in Iraq. He supports the war and the President.We are up to 50/50.

    Annie, where in So Cal do you live?I am in Bakersfield.

  244. JM
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 11:27 pm | Permalink

    Not hardly Capn,

    For once you need to stop distorting what I write.

    I told Andrew to be careful on what he wrote because communications are monitored very carefully in a war zone.

    You slip up and give a location where you are, what kind of unit you are in and etc. this is not a good thing. The enemy monitors things like this too.

  245. Dan
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 11:29 pm | Permalink

    CapnAmerica,I remember a lot of things… banners…. aircraft carriers… jumpsuits… painful things. My real problem is that everything we hear now just sounds like shutting the gate after the horses are gone. I can’t understand how we can let this stuff happen. Then again, you can go all the way back in history and watch the cycle repeat itself over and over. When disinterest and apathy are the national pastime and our idea of a war is trying to fight as an occupying force on the other side of an ocean which has NEVER worked EVER. (the ivy league must be slipping on it’s history classes) The entire government looks like a laurel and hardy movie… (read: Yes I voted for the war but I didn’t think it was good idea, this is another fine mess you’ve gotten us into!) I’m starting to think the folks heading for the bar have the best idea. 151 and leave the bottle.

  246. JM
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 11:42 pm | Permalink

    Here you go Capn,

    An example of what I was warning Andrew about.

    “…here’s a good reason why American Soldier and other milibloggers keep pseudonyms: to stay out of trouble with military brass. Another pseudonymous military blogger, known as CBFTW, was unmasked as Army specialist Colby Buzzell after his superiors found his blog and said it was potentially undermining “operational security,” a.k.a. OPSEC.

    http://www.ojr.org/ojr/glaser/1096404261.php

    The Annenberg Center for Communication of the University of Southern California (USC)

  247. GaryC.
    Posted January 23, 2007 at 11:50 pm | Permalink

    JM is a Douche Bag.

    The facts are in his face and he sits there and trys to twist and turn reality.

    Simply delusional.

    Your holding on to anything you can find with this administration, arent you?

  248. JM
    Posted January 24, 2007 at 12:00 am | Permalink

    Gary C.

    Twist and turn reality? Point out in this thread where I twisted and turned reality.

    I’ll address you on any subject you wish if I have knowledge of it. I suck at electronics and poetry, so don’t go there. :)

  249. RD
    Posted January 24, 2007 at 12:28 am | Permalink

    Aw, gee, it’s over?

    I did try to watch, but my best friend of 42 years (we were friends in the womb) called to ask if I could believe all the bullshit. She knew I would be watching. (Now you know how a friendship can last 42 years.)

    One point I’d like to add is that before any of the “dignitaries” arrived, the commentators were talking about how the Dems had been told to react. Repubs, too, so it isn’t one-sided. Both wanted their people to show respect. No eyebrow raising at a comment–it might end up on YouTube. No falling asleep. No hooting and hollering (my words, not theirs). They wanted both sides to appear bipartisan to the American public.

    I’d say they did a fair job of that, even though I missed pretty much everything after the first 5 minutes of the speech, itself.

    And I sure didn’t see Cheney bobbing up and down as much as Pelosi did. Afraid it might be too much exercise for his poor heart?

    Same old, same old lies and b.s.

    Would somebody PLEASE fix my country?

  250. Posted January 24, 2007 at 12:30 am | Permalink

    Mr. Kia- I am south of you…near Hollywood, land of electronics and poetry. It’s been fun, and hopefully educational. Good night!

  251. Posted January 24, 2007 at 6:55 am | Permalink

    “mind disabilities”

    Love that Freudian slip, PMom!

    Would the above restrict JM from getting a job, I am wondering…

  252. CF
    Posted January 24, 2007 at 8:11 am | Permalink

    “All he is saying,is give war a chance.”

  253. TRACY
    Posted January 24, 2007 at 8:18 am | Permalink

    The comments below were sent by ordinary Americans across the country to Senator Jim Webb as he prepared to deliver the official Democratic response to the president’s State of the Union.

    Paul S.:I served in the U. S. Navy (enlisting 3 days prior to my 18th birthday) during World War II. That was a great honor for me.

    This Iraq war was wrong from the first being based on false information. We have continued to be involved in what is truly a civil war between people who have been fighting each other for years and will continue to do so.

    It’s time we got out of there and stopped the useless loss of lives and crippling injuries of our young men and women.

    The Congress needs to do whatever is necessary to stop it and stop it soon!

    James S.:We must bring our troops home! Sunday was the deadliest day in two years and one of the deadliest ever in this war for our troops. We went there without a cause; we went there without a plan; we went there without a focus. We have stayed without the support of the Iraqi people; we have stayed without the support of the world community; now we are staying without the support of the American people. We must come home, now!

    Margaret P.:Health care for all is a critical issue even for those who already have health insurance. The cost of drugs, medical procedures, and doctors’ appointments is rising every year. We have many insurance plans for those working and over a hundred plans for Medicare D, which makes the drug and insurance companies very wealthy. The amount of paper work is out of sight. I’d like to see a universal health care plan where everyone is covered. It could be pay as you go (our pay checks taxed, as social security is) and we should be able to cover the poor by seeing that they have a health exam each year, thereby avoiding all those emergency room visits. The saddest thing is that the money wasted on this Iraq fiasco, could have covered every citizen’s health needs and we still would have money left over for all the public schools in the nation.

    Christopher B.:Lobbying and Ethics reform. Take away the power of corporate interests and restore power to the people– by amendment if necessary. Money should not pollute our Democracy.

    Grant C.:I believe we need to look inside ourselves, as a country, to find a common ground… the place where our differences are respected as a part of a living, changing vision. We cannot be divisive about the need for better healthcare, education and emergency management. In a civilized society, these are basic rights that all people must be allowed to enjoy. We must be world leaders in these areas, demonstrating the power of democracy to thrive on a higher level, before we can expect others to embrace our ideals.

    Evangeline F.:I would like for the state of Hurricane Katrina homes in New Orleans to be mentioned. It’s still a national disgrace because the 9th ward is still untouched. It looks like the hurricane just left. No clean up whatsoever has taken place.

  254. gster
    Posted January 24, 2007 at 8:28 am | Permalink

    I still don’t understand how you can stop a religious/politically driven civil war with a gun?

  255. Posted January 24, 2007 at 8:59 am | Permalink

    It’s a full-time job keeping JM honest, because he’s essentially dishonest.

    “Ask your Commander or First Shirt on what level of respect you are supposed to say to active duty and retired personnel.

    “I don’t think the term dumbass is included in there.”

    Now go back and read JM critique of Former Sec’ry of the Navy Jim Webb’s rebuttal to the SOTU.

    Can any sentient being see that as showing “respect”?

    He holds OTHERS to standards he won’t hold himself to . . . typical.

    But he sure has no trouble cashing those gov’t pension checks paid for by you and me.

  256. Posted August 17, 2007 at 10:03 pm | Permalink

    Hello, my name is Alex Bitterman.If you are looking for 100% a legit job where you have to work to earnmoney not stay to earn money then this is the job for you.ABOUT US:Unicorn Shipping Inc – As the world’s largest package delivery company and a leading global provider of specialized transportation and logistics services, Unicorn Shipping continues to develop the frontiers of logistics, supply chain management, and e-Commerce . . . combining the flows of goods, information, and funds.PART-TIME POSITION:We are currently accepting applications for Shipping / Receiving Clerk.DESCRIPTION:Under general supervision, performs routing manual and clerical duties related to the shipment or receipt of materials, supplies, equipment, and finished products. Checking goods against shipping documents, packing goods for shipment according to specifications, verifying identification and quantity of products, preparing bills of lading, posting weight and shipping charges, maintaining inventory of packaging supplies. Receiving activities include receipt and unpacking of goods, verifying identification and quantity, inputting records of goods received, rejects damaged, excess or misdirected goods, routes materials to proper destination. Must have experience with UPS and FedEx shipments, stable internet connection at home. Computer Literate a mustIdeal candidates will need to fill requisitions and orders in a timely manner, ability to lift up to 50 pounds.CANDIDATE REQUIREMENTS & BENEFITS:- More than 18 years old.- An ability to reply promptly to the e-mails every day.- An ability to receive phone calls from us.- Weekends and holidays off (except Air Hubs);- Comprehensive medical and life insurance for you and your dependents;We offer excellent compensation, benefits and opportunities for personal growth, flexible hours, training and development, as well as the vacation schedule. Great opportunity to work in a fast paced environment and learn from a world-class organization.If you are looking for a great job at a great company, solid opportunity and a career path to success, you’ve come to the right place!We would LOVE to work with you, so reply to this posting and send us your resume today. Don’t put your career in the hands of just anyone, put it in the hands of a specialist.Alex BittermanUnicorn Shipping Inc.vacancy@unicorn-shipping.com