Open thread

104 Comments

  1. WSClark
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 1:15 am | Permalink

    New thread – no trolls, stalkers, lurkers, morons, racists, idiots, anti-semitics and general foul anti-social behavior.

    Thanks you,

  2. KSGolfnut
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 1:17 am | Permalink

    And no drug addicts.

  3. jill
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 5:57 am | Permalink

    WSC should be out moron!

  4. TRACY
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 5:58 am | Permalink

    Balls….CLUE…..Pot smokers aren’t nearly addicted as drunks and tobacco users.I know, you just like to taunt WSC.

    It’s nice that meadowpoop hasn’t bombed us with more GOP talking points.

  5. TRACY
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 6:00 am | Permalink

    jill, is that you?Did you get the weed?It ain’t all seedy like the last crap is it?

  6. Posted January 9, 2007 at 6:56 am | Permalink

    Interestingly, the Bush administration is replacing Miers with a battle hardened veteran from the Nixon (watergate)/Reagan (Iran/Contra) era. They would be very afraid, would they?

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/08/AR2007010801003.html

  7. Posted January 9, 2007 at 7:39 am | Permalink

    Today is the birthday of Richard M. Nixon (1913 to 1994).

  8. hmmm ...
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 7:48 am | Permalink

    golfer, jill – I have seen no evidence that WSC is an addict any more than that golfer is an alcoholic. They both use mind-altering drugs; however I have seen evidence that that use crosses the line to addiction.

  9. Bob
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 7:51 am | Permalink

    Well that went downhill fast.

  10. Iwish
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 7:51 am | Permalink

    I wish fleetwood would develop an extremely painful and utimately fatal anal tumor.

  11. anonymous
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 7:53 am | Permalink

    “Of course, nobody is obligated to pay more than what the letter of the law requires. But the complex tax code benefits the wealthy, who can afford tax attorneys and complicated schemes to skirt the law. And high marginal rates give them plenty of incentive to do so.

    Senator Edwards talks about the need to provide health care for all, but that didn’t stop him from using a clever tax dodge to avoid paying $591,000 into the Medicare system. While making his fortune as a trial lawyer in 1995, he formed what is known as a “subchapter S” corporation, with himself as the sole shareholder.

    Instead of taking his $26.9 million in earnings directly in the following four years, he paid himself a salary of $360,000 a year and took the rest as corporate dividends. Since salary is subject to 2.9% Medicare tax but dividends aren’t, that meant he shielded more than 90% of his income. That’s not necessarily illegal, but dodging such a large chunk of employment tax skates perilously close to the line…As a political matter, the dodge is especially hypocritical because the income limits on which Medicare taxes are paid were lifted by Democrats in 1993 specifically to hit “the rich,” as Mr. Edwards likes to call people in his tax bracket.”

  12. TRACY
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 7:54 am | Permalink

    Are we rollin’ down hilllike a snowballheaded for hell?

  13. gster
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 7:58 am | Permalink

    Tracy- Doncha just love the smell of Blog in the morning?

    Eau du funky socks with a touch of Pepe le Phew, perhaps?

  14. delores
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 8:20 am | Permalink

    anonymous,Anyone would be crazy not to take advantage of the tax code to pay the least amount in taxes, even Edwards.This really is a non-issue for me concerning a Presidential candidate.

  15. SolDevVB
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 8:23 am | Permalink

    So why no article on Israel practicing 2,000 mile sorties? The story broke with their tactical nuke plan, but that was just hype. Hell we have a tactical nuke plan to invade England, doesn’t mean we’ll use it.

    The bigger story is the sortie training. Only one target 2,000 miles away. Even a conventional strike would wreak havoc on the area. We would be dragged in by some mechanism to support the Israelis.

    Do y’all think the training is just a show of force to get the world to pay more attention to the Iran nuke escalation?

  16. dusty chaps
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 8:24 am | Permalink

    In keeping with the energy issues, I would highly recommend the article in this momths Scientific American about the problems associated with corn conversion to ethonol.

    Part of it states it would require the entire crop of corn to obtain the quantity of ethonal the government wants to produce . . . dumb. It also states the energy used to produce ethonal is slightly less than that produced by one gallon of the same. No savings there.

    In fact, we are importing natural gas from canada to produce the ethonal. Woohoo!!!.

  17. RD
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 8:33 am | Permalink

    While it’s true that Big Oil is against any form of alternate energy plans, watch for them to start buying into them, absorbing any small company that looks like it might be gaining ground.

  18. RD
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 8:34 am | Permalink

    I find it highly ironic that a person who can’t punctuate well enough to make a sentence reasonably easy to understand is calling someone else a moron.

  19. TRACY
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 8:36 am | Permalink

    Gee-my blog smells like coffee and #2 fuel oil, mixed.Yuck.And good morning!

  20. TRACY
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 8:37 am | Permalink

    RD, who’s a mooran?

  21. TRACY
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 8:38 am | Permalink

    Dusty, maybe it’s time to quit paying farmers to NOT plant and harvest?

  22. SolDevVB
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 8:40 am | Permalink

    Sawgrass works better than corn =)

  23. gster
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 8:42 am | Permalink

    mooran??

    Is that a hit and run cow?I’m confused!

  24. Posted January 9, 2007 at 9:26 am | Permalink

    Oh, goodie, another cheap shot at a so-called leftist.

    First, it’s Ralph Nader–the man that every leftist HATES for sucking just enough votes from Gore in Florida to make him lose the electoral college.

    Now we get this cheap shot against Edwards, the guy who runs for president more often than he served in Congress.

    And get a load of this sentence: “salary is subject to 2.9% Medicare tax but dividends aren’t”

    Yeah, why is that, anon, you dumbass?

    It couldn’t be because the Republicans value wealth over work, that they re-wrote the tax code so that rich investors get tax breaks that the working class and the middle class don’t get, could it?

    HELL YES.

    You’re own evidence condemns you position.

    What a maroon . . .

  25. SolDevVB
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 9:29 am | Permalink

    No takers on Israel? That’s odd. This is going to make Iraq look like Grenada. Huh…

  26. ksfarmgrrl
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 9:38 am | Permalink

    hee hee hee hee

    I see I am late to the party here.

    Smells like stale beer and old roaches in here.

    Not to mention that the smokers left their butts all over the front steps.

    I also see a few empties out on the lawn.

    hee hee hee hee hee hee

    Smells like coffee, bacon and eggs at my house.

    And cleaning products and printer ink while I have a little time off.

    hee hee hee hee hee hee hee

    Getting out the green visor to work on taxes right now!

  27. ksfarmgrrl
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 9:39 am | Permalink

    Hey Tracy, sorry to gently disagree brother, but we dont get paid anymore to NOT grow crops.

    That kinds went out with Nixon.

    Now we get subsidized for the crops we DO grow.

    Like corn. Go figger.

  28. TRACY
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 9:40 am | Permalink

    Kool!Good thing I don’t farm.

  29. ksfarmgrrl
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 9:41 am | Permalink

    …and did I mention the unmistakable odor of old bong water?

    hee hee hee hee hee hee hee hee

    The sure sign aging hippies were partying.

    There must have been a few CONservatives at the party too.

    I also detect the odor of flop sweat…

  30. TRACY
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 9:42 am | Permalink

    Sol you needa talk with ED.

  31. Posted January 9, 2007 at 9:44 am | Permalink

    Remember when Bush said he was gonna make ethanol out of switchgrass in the last State of the Union . . . how’s that coming along, George?

    I got the feeling that George couldn’t pick switchgrass out of a line up of bluegrass and bermuda.

    But it’s gotten to the point that no one can take the man seriously anymore. He obviously hasn’t known what he’s talking about for several years now.

  32. TRACY
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 9:44 am | Permalink

    KFG, I believe that’s some flat pepsi someone poured in the bong.

    And DAMNIT,somebody peed in the floor furnace,AGAIN.

    That’s it, everybody out!

  33. gster
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 9:53 am | Permalink

    Is that Lava light moving, or is it me?

    Holy window pane!

  34. ksfarmgrrl
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 9:55 am | Permalink

    ROFLMQAO Tracy!!!!

    I’m so glad I never had a floor furnace.

    And for the record, long ago in a land far away, we used to pour TJ Swan in the bong.

    It was damn near cheaper than water. heheheheheheheheheh

  35. SolDevVB
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 9:56 am | Permalink

    Tracy,ED? Erectile Dysfunction? Damn it, who talked? Who spilled the beans?

    Just kidding. Who is ED?

  36. ksfarmgrrl
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 9:57 am | Permalink

    Gster, I think that is orange sunshine coming in through the window pane….

  37. TRACY
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 10:00 am | Permalink

    You guys are BAD.Bad-bad!

    Sol, Ed is our resident zionist expert, when he comes around.He used to harp on the evil relationship with Israel, and nobody believed him. We all taunted him, until….WE FIGURED OUT HE WAS RIGHT!

  38. TRACY
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 10:02 am | Permalink

    NOT ABOUT OIL?

    Future of Iraq: The spoils of warHow the West will make a killing on Iraqi oil riches

    By Danny Fortson, Andrew Murray-Watson and Tim WebbPublished: 07 January 2007

    Iraq’s massive oil reserves, the third-largest in the world, are about to be thrown open for large-scale exploitation by Western oil companies under a controversial law which is expected to come before the Iraqi parliament within days.

    The US government has been involved in drawing up the law, a draft of which has been seen by The Independent on Sunday. It would give big oil companies such as BP, Shell and Exxon 30-year contracts to extract Iraqi crude and allow the first large-scale operation of foreign oil interests in the country since the industry was nationalised in 1972.

    The huge potential prizes for Western firms will give ammunition to critics who say the Iraq war was fought for oil. They point to statements such as one from Vice-President Dick Cheney, who said in 1999, while he was still chief executive of the oil services company Halliburton, that the world would need an additional 50 million barrels of oil a day by 2010. “So where is the oil going to come from?… The Middle East, with two-thirds of the world’s oil and the lowest cost, is still where the prize ultimately lies,” he said.

    Oil industry executives and analysts say the law, which would permit Western companies to pocket up to three-quarters of profits in the early years, is the only way to get Iraq’s oil industry back on its feet after years of sanctions, war and loss of expertise. But it will operate through “production-sharing agreements” (or PSAs) which are highly unusual in the Middle East, where the oil industry in Saudi Arabia and Iran, the world’s two largest producers, is state controlled.

    Opponents say Iraq, where oil accounts for 95 per cent of the economy, is being forced to surrender an unacceptable degree of sovereignty.CONTINUED….http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/article2132569.ece

  39. gster
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 10:14 am | Permalink

    KFG- Maybe your’re right…. makes for a beautiful sunrise, huh?

  40. KSGolfnut
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 10:25 am | Permalink

    “KFG”

    Makes me think I need to visit the Colonel for lunch for some extra crispy.

  41. Ian Santiago
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 10:26 am | Permalink

    Quote of the Day:

    “When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by the sign, that the dunces are all in conspiracy against him.” Jonathan Swift (1667-1745)

    Viva La Raza Blanco!!

  42. political_mom
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 10:56 am | Permalink

    The bong was the only real way to smoke a bowl. These kids just don’t know what they’re missing nowadays with their blunts.

  43. political_mom
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 11:06 am | Permalink

    kstesticles, why do you want to have lunch with me anyway.

  44. Ian Santiago
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 11:08 am | Permalink

    PMOM,

    Please, stop talking about your Connie Morris-like past, lest you get the Golfnut all hot and bothered, again!

    Viva la Raza Blanco!!

  45. KSGolfnut
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 11:21 am | Permalink

    Pee – in the interest of civility

  46. SolDevVB
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 11:26 am | Permalink

    P-Mom and GolfNutsSitting in a treeK-I-S-S-I-N-G…….

  47. KSGolfnut
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 11:28 am | Permalink

    Invite others, too. Seems like a good idea to me. My kid swims 8:30 am – about noon, and then again Sunday. So we’ll have all Saturday afternoon free in [gasp] Salina.

  48. Ian Santiago
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 11:29 am | Permalink

    The clock is ticking, folks, and alot of you have blood on your hands!

    http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/C/CRIMINAL_IMMIGRANTS?SITE=7219&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2007-01-08-08-55-21

    By LARA JAKES JORDANAssociated Press WriterU.S. VideoAdvertisementMultimediaShelters Provide Stability for Young ImmigrantsRecent StoriesTexas Town to Vote on Landlord IssueMore Criminal Charges in Meatpacker Raid

    How EU Labor Market Barriers Vary

    Britain Debates Key Globalization Puzzle

    Immigration to Israel Falls in 2006

    Buy AP Photo Reprints
    WASHINGTON (AP) — Immigrants arrested for being in the United States illegally may have been charged up to six more times, for more serious crimes, after they were released by local authorities, new Justice Department data indicate.

    Additionally, a separate report also issued Monday concludes that the number of illegal immigrants deported after being declared a felon is on the rise.

    The Justice findings by department Inspector General Glenn A. Fine examined the criminal histories of 100 illegal immigrants arrested and then released by local and state authorities in 2004, the latest complete data available. Of the sample group of 100, according to the audit, 73 immigrants were later arrested a collective 429 times – on charges ranging from traffic tickets to weapons and drug charges….

    Viva La Revolucion Blanco!!

  49. Posted January 9, 2007 at 12:05 pm | Permalink

    http://blog.citizensforethics.org/node/478

    Here’s one of the pictures that Bush managed to keep under wraps until after the mid-term elections.

    “Jack Abramoff . . . the biggest money raiser after Kenny Boy Lay . . . nope, don’t ever remember meeting him.”

    Who are you going to believe? Bush or photographic proof?

  50. TRACY
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 12:06 pm | Permalink

    I saw that capn.Worth a thousand op-eds,ain’t it?

  51. TRACY
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 12:08 pm | Permalink

    Balls, I wish I could be there to get you guys lined out on the speaking tour.

  52. JM
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 12:10 pm | Permalink

    http://www.kansas.com/mld/kansas/16419184.htm

    Glad Chester Lewis is getting the park named after him. He deserves the name recognition for being brave when the times called for bravery.

  53. TRACY
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 12:13 pm | Permalink

    PMOM, BALLS.I think when ya’ll meet you should both have one of those airport chauffer signs.One saying BALLS, another PeeMom.

    Just an idea.

  54. JM
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 12:14 pm | Permalink

    Looks like Raj Goyle is taking it to Phelps big time.From Today’s Eagle:”Rep. Raj Goyle, D-Wichita, wasted no time introducing his first bill, a measure to crack down on the one Kansan whom politicians on both sides of the aisle love to hate, the Rev. Fred Phelps.

    The stridently anti-gay pastor of a small Topeka congregation has drawn national attention to himself and Kansas by taking his protests to military funerals across the country.

    Goyle’s bill is designed to “put their protests at a distance where the decorum of a funeral would be respected.”

  55. TRACY
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 12:15 pm | Permalink

    Good for Raj.The whole world supports this.

  56. Posted January 9, 2007 at 12:15 pm | Permalink

    HEY SolDevVB and golfnuts,

    Ranchers in Colorado are STILL whining for FEMA’s help.

    ‘More in line for blizzard help’http://test.denverpost.com/news/ci_4975092The Colorado National Guard, which spent last week providing hay to animals by air and over land, was winding down its operation Sunday.

    A preliminary estimate pegs the cost of storm cleanup and rescue efforts in Prowers County alone at nearly $1 million – money the county doesn’t have.

    “Our resources from the county, they were more than expended in the first couple days,” said County Commissioner Gene Millbrand.

    He said ranchers are still calling and asking: “Where’s the help? Where’s the helicopters? Why were they pulled out?”

  57. Ian Santiago
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 12:18 pm | Permalink

    It looks like currymuncher come lately, goyle, is trying to ingratiate himself with east/west coast leftist hierarchy.

    viva la Raza Blanco!!

  58. Wal mart defeated!
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 12:20 pm | Permalink

    Wichita city council votes 5-2 to deny zoning at Oliver and Kellogg for a Wal mart store! Let the pigeons loose!

  59. SolDevVB
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 12:22 pm | Permalink

    Cosmos.

    When these folks start stealing $2000 debt cards, murdering each other, looting, pointing the finger at the government, stealing from each other, raising the crime rate in areas that accept them openly after being displaced… When any of this happens, you MIGHT have a leg to stand on. Until then, you are picking nits.

  60. Posted January 9, 2007 at 12:23 pm | Permalink

    No kidding, Wal Mart.

    Is this for real? You gotta link?

    If it is, this is great news for our established neighborhoods.

  61. delores
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 12:47 pm | Permalink

    If that’s true about Wal-Mart-beer all around!!

    Can you tell I own a home in that area.

    I wonder who the 2 were.

  62. Anonymous
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 12:48 pm | Permalink

    From kansas.com

    “The Wichita City Council voted this morning to deny Wal-Mart’s request to build a superstore southeast of Kellogg and Oliver.Council members said Wal-Mart was not able to properly address nearby property owners’ concerns about harming their property values and quality of life.Council members said Wal-Mart is free to come back with another proposal if it addresses neighbors’ concerns.Wal-Mart had asked for more time to do so, but several council members said the council needed to show the public where it stands.Only Mayor Carlos Mayans and council member Paul Gray voted against denying the proposal. Gray said the council usually defers such matters for further discussion.About 50 people attended the meeting, many with signs opposing the project.”

    !

  63. RD
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 1:05 pm | Permalink

    “RD, who’s a mooran?”

    Not I. Also, not me.

    (See jill’s post. Can you make sense of it?)

  64. TRACY
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 1:09 pm | Permalink

    Yeah I kinda noticed jill has a problem with language.And I spelled bad too.make that maroon.

  65. SolDevVB
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 1:10 pm | Permalink

    Ah, she’s not here to defend herself. No use beating up someone who isn’t here.

  66. SolDevVB
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 1:11 pm | Permalink

    Does anyone know how to turn off auto caching for these pages?

  67. TRACY
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 1:13 pm | Permalink

    she’s not hurt any.what auto cache?

  68. SolDevVB
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 1:15 pm | Permalink

    Have you clicked on a user name on the right and been taken to the TOP of that thread instead of that poster’s entry? The browser is serving you a cached (stored) page instead of a fresh page. Annoying. You have to refresh that page to get current content.

  69. TRACY
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 1:16 pm | Permalink

    Oh thanks.I’m ignorant.U knew that.

  70. Posted January 9, 2007 at 1:20 pm | Permalink

    SolDevVB,

    Do you have a memory problem?You posted an email from Colorado that claimed that “No one howled for the government”.http://www.snopes.com/katrina/soapbox/dakota.asp

    You were wrong — and FEMA is again (like with Katrina) SLOW responding to requests to help ranchers.

  71. SolDevVB
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 1:30 pm | Permalink

    Do I have a memory problem? Uh, no, but obviously you do. Maybe you should read a little down thread from there. And you still don’t want to talk about the looting, theft, murders do you? Isn’t that convenient for you? Party on cosmos.

  72. KSGolfnut
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 1:34 pm | Permalink

    Tracy,Yeah, I’m thinking about having a big ol’ (XXL) sweatshirt made with “BALLS” on the front.

    Just for the occasion.

    And, maybe I’ll make a point of always wearing it when I’m perusing WeBlog.

  73. CF
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 1:45 pm | Permalink

    Wal-Fart falls! Dang. Who knew?

    I thought for sure it was a done deal. For the City Council to put the kibosh on it, things must have been pretty bad.

    MOST excellent. David fells Goliath.

  74. Vaughn Tolle
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 2:56 pm | Permalink

    As I read it, Wal-Mart can return to the issue if it addresses the concerns expressed by the opponents. So, any celebration might be a bit premature.

  75. Posted January 9, 2007 at 3:02 pm | Permalink

    Interesting. Home owners band together and say NO! to Wal-Mart when their property values are at stake.

    When the issue is just low wages, no unions, and no real health care, heigh ho, business as usual . . .

    The capacity to endure someone else’s pain knows no bounds. But don’t put that damn thing next to MY HOUSE.

  76. SolDevVB
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 3:04 pm | Permalink

    If the Wal-Mart goes in the home owner’s home vale goes down without their choice. If someone works at Wal-Mart and can’t afford rent, they did so by choice. You still believe in ‘Its my body my choice’ right cap’n?

  77. SolDevVB
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 3:05 pm | Permalink

    value*

  78. TRACY
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 3:07 pm | Permalink

    Well, ya’ know Balls.I gave ya’ hell at first.But I’ve come around and decided you’re all right, even if ya’ do vote repug.Balls fits your personality, (and possibly mine), so wear it with PRIDE.

  79. Posted January 9, 2007 at 3:11 pm | Permalink

    One problem with that analysis, SolVDB.

    It assumes that there are all these good jobs out there and someone willingly CHOOSES Wal-Mart.

    They work at Wal-Mart because it’s all they can get. And because Wal-Mart is so big, it can actually drive wages down in the entire area.

    How is that a choice? These workers have a choice like slaves have a choice–work there or starve.

  80. SolDevVB
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 3:15 pm | Permalink

    Hey brother, I don’t really buy that one. I moved to Michigan to be closer to my son (I don’t have custody) and my wife’s family is here. When the economy went south, so did I. I went where the work was. When the market stabilized a bit, we moved back.

  81. TRACY
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 3:34 pm | Permalink

    Hey everbody, all you regulars especially.Our resident troll has gotten our fun over at the drug thread shut down.First time I’ve seen that!

  82. WSClark
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 3:37 pm | Permalink

    I saw that, Tracy, it’s really sad when you think about it – nothing good to say, troll and lurk, shut down a thread that DID have some reasonable and thoughtful posters.

    Well, I guess they’ll be over here before long.

  83. TRACY
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 3:40 pm | Permalink

    Even if it wasn’t exactly highbrow commentary….IT WAS FUN!

    See ya’ tommorrow and we’ll try it again.

  84. SolDevVB
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 3:45 pm | Permalink

    Its back up. betting they are tracking IP addy’s

  85. Ian Santiago
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 3:45 pm | Permalink

    Sollie, I am loathe to agree with our good Capn’, but in the case of ChinaMart, I must concur. They not only pay their employees a pittance in relation to their profits, theeir slash and burn approach literally destroys all local mom and pop concerns, many of them having been established for decades.

    The undercut all the competition via the stranglehold they have over their suppliers. I often compare ChinaMart to the Borg from Star Trek, their destructive capacity is similar.

    I am a small business owner myself and I am all for free enterprise. However, i despise bandit robber-baron capitalism, monopoly and freebees and corporate welfare. Sadly, I fear that ChinaMart will try and try again here until they succeed: Resistance is Futile, You Will be Assimilated!!

    Viva la Raza Blanco!!

  86. Posted January 9, 2007 at 3:50 pm | Permalink

    SolDVB–

    It’s a very complex issue, I’ll grant you.

    A lot of people do succeed against terrible odds and other people fail when they seem to have every advantage. And certainly, if a worker doesn’t really try (or know how to try) to get a job, they probably won’t get one.

    But the overall trend of Wal-Mart is just bad–it’s bad for the workers, it’s bad for the employees, it’s bad for the suppliers pushed to the wall and forced to outsource work to chase cheap labor, it’s bad for unions which have done more than any institution in bringing wealth to the middle class–why do you think the rich hate them so?

    Some people some of the time may benefit in the short term from working or shopping at Wal Mart. But the overall model is a bad one for our society, IMHO.

  87. Posted January 9, 2007 at 3:57 pm | Permalink

    Wow, good post, IAN!

    I’m telling you man, your rage is justified, but you’re mad at the wrong people.

    Racial and ethnic distinctions are nothing compared to class and access to power.

    National Public Radio did a piece on some reconcilation projects between the KKK and local blacks. The Klansmen realized after some interaction that they were all in the same boat . . .

  88. gster
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 3:59 pm | Permalink

    Good comments!

  89. Posted January 9, 2007 at 4:02 pm | Permalink

    And it’s true that gov’t’s heavy-handed attempts to redress past wrongs have backfired.

    Affirmative action for instance meets a lot of justifiable resistance–why should Bill Cosby’s daughter get special help getting into college when some poor white Appalachian kid that grew up using an outhouse gets nothing because he’s “white.”

    There is no black and white–there’s only GREEN, money green.

  90. KSGolfnut
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 4:08 pm | Permalink

    I think the closure of the drug thread wasn’t due to the trolls – hell, we have those every day on every thread.

    I’m willing to bet it’s because y’all were sharing stories on how to best toke the weed, use the bong, etc. I doubt the WE wants to be associated with a blog that has it’s members coaching each other on illegal activities.

  91. Smoker
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 4:18 pm | Permalink

    … and that would be why the jokes about bongs, etc, are still there but the comments from trollers and lurkers are gone, right?

    A little funny, KSGolfnut, why would you be defending the trolls?

  92. political_mom
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 4:36 pm | Permalink

    In the interest of civility? Hmm.. what if you just want more ammunition to stalk me? What if you actually LIKE me? What if I end up thinking you’re an ok guy?

    I doubt it, but hey, it could happen. Colt and I used to fight like fiends on the Sj boards till we met face to face.

    I am laughing my butt off at the tee shirt, sign posts though. I just can’t think of anything else I’d wear a “pee” shirt to justifying the expense.

    I’m still thinking about it. My curiosity is piqued.

  93. KSGolfnut
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 4:41 pm | Permalink

    Okie dokie. No pressure either way. Just seems like a decent idea.

    Smoker, I’m not defending anyone – especially the trolls. Just making a logical observation.

  94. Smoker
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 4:41 pm | Permalink

    Don’t do it, Mom, don’t do it! Think about your children!

  95. Julie
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 4:45 pm | Permalink

    jughead-care to provide proof to your accusations?

  96. WSClark
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 4:46 pm | Permalink

    This troll, stalk and lurk thing is getting really lame – before long, the entire blog will be shut down because of this nonsense.

    Good job, folks, It’s real freakin’ funny.

    And you will be the first to complain when the blog is wiped off the website.

  97. WSClark
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 4:54 pm | Permalink

    If I were you P Mom, I would be very wary of any offer of civility from Nutz. His standard MO is to try manipulation followed by intimidation followed by slander.

    I am sorry to say, but it is obvious that he is up to no good.

    BTW – Have you noticed that Uma and Jugge are only around when Nutz is around?

  98. Posted January 9, 2007 at 5:10 pm | Permalink

    ‘NOAA REPORTS 2006 WARMEST YEAR ON RECORD FOR U.S.General Warming Trend, El Ni?±o Contribute to Milder Winter Temps’http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2007/s2772.htm

  99. KSGolfnut
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 5:38 pm | Permalink

    DA,If I were trolling, I certainly wouldn’t be posting on this name at the same time.

    Dude, relax.

  100. uma
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 7:29 pm | Permalink

    Tracy has a little dick and WSClark’s malignant narcissism, paranoia and defensive aggression ‚Äì date from his relationship with his father rather than the mother-child bond. This has shaped all he has done and will do.

  101. WSClark
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 7:36 pm | Permalink

    Interesting, Nutz then Uma…….

    No connection?

  102. KSGolfnut
    Posted January 9, 2007 at 9:35 pm | Permalink

    DA,There were two hours between my last post and uma’s. At 7:29, I was on the stairmaster at the Y.

  103. Posted January 9, 2007 at 11:37 pm | Permalink

    WSClark–

    I used to get trolled all the time and I had all kinds of theories as who it was.

    Many people have thought I was trolling them when I wasn’t.

    I thought outlander was trolling me once because of the timing of his posts.

    He wasn’t. I was very, very wrong.

    The way this blog is set up, it’s virtually impossible for us on this side of the fence to guess who’s who and who’s posting.

    The best you can do is use typekey which requires a password to log on. That way, if and when you get trolled, you can easily prove it wasn’t you because they’re not logged in to your account.

    It’s a serious design flaw of this blog which the people in charge don’t want to take the time to fix apparently.

    If you go to a really big, well run blog like DemocraticUnderground.com for instance, you can see how it should look.

    Each thread is moderated. Disruptors posts are pulled, usually within ten minutes, and their user name account is deleted. Also the e-mail they use to set up a new account cannot be a free generic account such as yahoo or hotmail.

  104. Posted January 9, 2007 at 11:42 pm | Permalink

    Also, instead of a huge list of 100 posts one has to wade through, they use “trees” so you can respond to a comment and someone can respond to your comment.

    You don’t have to read 20 posts to see if anybody responded to you or not.