<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wage gap narrows, but not in a good way</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/12/wage_gap_narrow/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/12/wage_gap_narrow/</link>
	<description>The Wichita Eagle Editorial Department Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 22:43:10 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/12/wage_gap_narrow/#comment-109795</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 03:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/12/wage_gap_narrowhtml/#comment-109795</guid>
		<description>For most families it would be the choice of living in austerity, or have two income earners to pay for lifes necessities.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For most families it would be the choice of living in austerity, or have two income earners to pay for lifes necessities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CrusaderX</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/12/wage_gap_narrow/#comment-109794</link>
		<dc:creator>CrusaderX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 05:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/12/wage_gap_narrowhtml/#comment-109794</guid>
		<description>Politicians don&#039;t care about your individual welfare. They just want you to vote for an ideal that is completely out of touch with the average American&#039;s life. If the hardcore capitalists or the socialists can&#039;t get this, then they are truly ignorant of American politics.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Politicians don&#8217;t care about your individual welfare. They just want you to vote for an ideal that is completely out of touch with the average American&#8217;s life. If the hardcore capitalists or the socialists can&#8217;t get this, then they are truly ignorant of American politics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KSGolfnut</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/12/wage_gap_narrow/#comment-109793</link>
		<dc:creator>KSGolfnut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 03:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/12/wage_gap_narrowhtml/#comment-109793</guid>
		<description>I completely disagree.  I know many families with stay-home moms.  Families of a variety of income levels, too.  It&#039;s all about making choices.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely disagree.  I know many families with stay-home moms.  Families of a variety of income levels, too.  It&#8217;s all about making choices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/12/wage_gap_narrow/#comment-109792</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 03:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/12/wage_gap_narrowhtml/#comment-109792</guid>
		<description>Gone are the good ol&#039; days when the wife could stay home and raise the kids, and the husband earn enough to support the family. That transformation took place under Reagan.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gone are the good ol&#8217; days when the wife could stay home and raise the kids, and the husband earn enough to support the family. That transformation took place under Reagan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dusty chaps</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/12/wage_gap_narrow/#comment-109791</link>
		<dc:creator>dusty chaps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 02:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/12/wage_gap_narrowhtml/#comment-109791</guid>
		<description>Good grief, don&#039;t we pay women enough as it is? How many of you married men, or those in the throes of romance, find your wallet depleted by a considerable amount at the end of each week? And the main suspect in that litening? Why, none other than a woman, I would bet. Glass ceiling? Can we make it a titanium ceiling? . . . he said sarcasdickly:-)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good grief, don&#8217;t we pay women enough as it is? How many of you married men, or those in the throes of romance, find your wallet depleted by a considerable amount at the end of each week? And the main suspect in that litening? Why, none other than a woman, I would bet. Glass ceiling? Can we make it a titanium ceiling? . . . he said sarcasdickly:-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KSGolfnut</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/12/wage_gap_narrow/#comment-109790</link>
		<dc:creator>KSGolfnut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 02:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/12/wage_gap_narrowhtml/#comment-109790</guid>
		<description>yes, who on this board suggested that it&#039;s ok to pay women less than men - ceteris paribus?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes, who on this board suggested that it&#8217;s ok to pay women less than men &#8211; ceteris paribus?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fleettwood</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/12/wage_gap_narrow/#comment-109789</link>
		<dc:creator>fleettwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 00:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/12/wage_gap_narrowhtml/#comment-109789</guid>
		<description>The post from 6:11 is not mine, although it is kind of funny.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The post from 6:11 is not mine, although it is kind of funny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fleettwood</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/12/wage_gap_narrow/#comment-109788</link>
		<dc:creator>fleettwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 00:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/12/wage_gap_narrowhtml/#comment-109788</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t ever recall anyone defending paying women less.  That is fundamentally unfair.Who is this republicon that you speak of?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t ever recall anyone defending paying women less.  That is fundamentally unfair.Who is this republicon that you speak of?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: political_mom</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/12/wage_gap_narrow/#comment-109787</link>
		<dc:creator>political_mom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 00:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/12/wage_gap_narrowhtml/#comment-109787</guid>
		<description>Well, don&#039;t you find it interesting that the republicons are the only ones who defend paying women less?

I&#039;m not surprised.  Hopefully any republican women will be though.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, don&#8217;t you find it interesting that the republicons are the only ones who defend paying women less?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not surprised.  Hopefully any republican women will be though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fleettwoood</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/12/wage_gap_narrow/#comment-109786</link>
		<dc:creator>fleettwoood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 00:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/12/wage_gap_narrowhtml/#comment-109786</guid>
		<description>I gotta go wee....

WEEEEEEEEE!!!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I gotta go wee&#8230;.</p>
<p>WEEEEEEEEE!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fleettwood</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/12/wage_gap_narrow/#comment-109785</link>
		<dc:creator>fleettwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 00:03:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/12/wage_gap_narrowhtml/#comment-109785</guid>
		<description>steve-If you had a day job, I&#039;d tell you to keep it.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>steve-If you had a day job, I&#8217;d tell you to keep it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/12/wage_gap_narrow/#comment-109784</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 23:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/12/wage_gap_narrowhtml/#comment-109784</guid>
		<description>Asking Republicans for equality reminds me of an old joke, where the guy with only one good arm, implores the God to make his  arms the same. He gets his wish, and has two bad arms!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Asking Republicans for equality reminds me of an old joke, where the guy with only one good arm, implores the God to make his  arms the same. He gets his wish, and has two bad arms!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KSGolfnut</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/12/wage_gap_narrow/#comment-109783</link>
		<dc:creator>KSGolfnut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 07:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/12/wage_gap_narrowhtml/#comment-109783</guid>
		<description>Clark,You&#039;re implying that any business owner can manipulate the books to say whatever he wants.  I don&#039;t disagree, but if anyone else has an interest in the business, he&#039;ll have an independent auditor perform due diligence.  And, just like my earlier comment about right-to-work, honesty is assumed.

Secondly, your little exposé on cash.  If I have a $5000 bill to a supplier due on the 30th, and I wait to pay it until the 1st in an effort to show a stronger financial position on my EOM financial statements...the net effect of that &quot;manipulation&quot; is zero.  Do you not understand balance sheet accounting?

Third, I submit to you that it&#039;s very unlikely (but not impossible) to have positive earnings and a negative ROI.  I don&#039;t use ROI because it&#039;s not relevant.  I&#039;ve submitted multiple business plans to my banker, and none of them has ever included an ROI analysis.  I have strategic plans, marketing plans, in-depth market research, current balance sheet, last 3 years income statements, projected income statements and balance sheet.  No IRR or ROI.  Ever.  It&#039;s not relevant.

You said ROI was the &quot;here and now&quot; - that&#039;s just false.  By definition, an ROI analysis takes into account multiple streams of cash/earnings in the future.  That&#039;s the whole purpose of a &quot;return&quot;  it&#039;s a rate.  An interest rate.  And, by definition, interest is the value of money over time.

So how can ROI be in the here and now?

Look, the ROI can be a valuable tool for certain applications.  If I were to consider buying a machine, and that machine would generate cash flow in some form over time, THEN and IRR or ROI analysis would be appropriate.

Or even if I have the opportunity to buy a business for a set price, and I know that I can generate cash flows from that business in the future.  Then the comparison of the cash flows with the investment in the businss would be a handy piece of analysis.  THAT would be an ROI.

But, an ROI is measured in percent, and a business is measured in dollars.  No business is valued via an ROI.

What&#039;s a justifiable price for stock in a company?  Simple:  the NPV of all the future cash flows plus the net equity in the company.  Divided by the outstanding number of shares.  If that comes out to be $20/share and the stock is currently trading at $15, then it&#039;s probably a good buy.  However, ultimately, the price of stock is determined by supply and demand.  But I digress...

To answer any outstanding questions that I see, Clark:

Yes, companies can survive with negative ROIs.  Some for a long long time.

And people invest in companies with ROIs below money market rates all the time.  It&#039;s called speculation.

I don&#039;t see where I didn&#039;t answer anything else other than rhetorical questions.  Now, kindly defend your expense v. income statement and explain how asset valuation has no impact on ROI.  Please don&#039;t give me the mumbo jumbo about manipulation.  Remember:  honesty is assumed.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clark,You&#8217;re implying that any business owner can manipulate the books to say whatever he wants.  I don&#8217;t disagree, but if anyone else has an interest in the business, he&#8217;ll have an independent auditor perform due diligence.  And, just like my earlier comment about right-to-work, honesty is assumed.</p>
<p>Secondly, your little exposé on cash.  If I have a $5000 bill to a supplier due on the 30th, and I wait to pay it until the 1st in an effort to show a stronger financial position on my EOM financial statements&#8230;the net effect of that &#8220;manipulation&#8221; is zero.  Do you not understand balance sheet accounting?</p>
<p>Third, I submit to you that it&#8217;s very unlikely (but not impossible) to have positive earnings and a negative ROI.  I don&#8217;t use ROI because it&#8217;s not relevant.  I&#8217;ve submitted multiple business plans to my banker, and none of them has ever included an ROI analysis.  I have strategic plans, marketing plans, in-depth market research, current balance sheet, last 3 years income statements, projected income statements and balance sheet.  No IRR or ROI.  Ever.  It&#8217;s not relevant.</p>
<p>You said ROI was the &#8220;here and now&#8221; &#8211; that&#8217;s just false.  By definition, an ROI analysis takes into account multiple streams of cash/earnings in the future.  That&#8217;s the whole purpose of a &#8220;return&#8221;  it&#8217;s a rate.  An interest rate.  And, by definition, interest is the value of money over time.</p>
<p>So how can ROI be in the here and now?</p>
<p>Look, the ROI can be a valuable tool for certain applications.  If I were to consider buying a machine, and that machine would generate cash flow in some form over time, THEN and IRR or ROI analysis would be appropriate.</p>
<p>Or even if I have the opportunity to buy a business for a set price, and I know that I can generate cash flows from that business in the future.  Then the comparison of the cash flows with the investment in the businss would be a handy piece of analysis.  THAT would be an ROI.</p>
<p>But, an ROI is measured in percent, and a business is measured in dollars.  No business is valued via an ROI.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s a justifiable price for stock in a company?  Simple:  the NPV of all the future cash flows plus the net equity in the company.  Divided by the outstanding number of shares.  If that comes out to be $20/share and the stock is currently trading at $15, then it&#8217;s probably a good buy.  However, ultimately, the price of stock is determined by supply and demand.  But I digress&#8230;</p>
<p>To answer any outstanding questions that I see, Clark:</p>
<p>Yes, companies can survive with negative ROIs.  Some for a long long time.</p>
<p>And people invest in companies with ROIs below money market rates all the time.  It&#8217;s called speculation.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see where I didn&#8217;t answer anything else other than rhetorical questions.  Now, kindly defend your expense v. income statement and explain how asset valuation has no impact on ROI.  Please don&#8217;t give me the mumbo jumbo about manipulation.  Remember:  honesty is assumed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WSClark</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/12/wage_gap_narrow/#comment-109782</link>
		<dc:creator>WSClark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 06:56:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/12/wage_gap_narrowhtml/#comment-109782</guid>
		<description>BTW - Nutz Boy - you trash me for not &quot;answering&quot; your questions, but, in reading back, I notice that you have yet to answer any of mine.

So WTF - to use your ancronym.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW &#8211; Nutz Boy &#8211; you trash me for not &#8220;answering&#8221; your questions, but, in reading back, I notice that you have yet to answer any of mine.</p>
<p>So WTF &#8211; to use your ancronym.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WSClark</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/12/wage_gap_narrow/#comment-109781</link>
		<dc:creator>WSClark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 06:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/12/wage_gap_narrowhtml/#comment-109781</guid>
		<description>&quot;You&#039;re welcome. You got a free short-course in finance tonight.&quot;

The day I need any help from you on anything and the day I thank you for anything will be the same day that Bush II gets invited to a Sunni-Shi&#039;ite Celebration of the Invasion of Iraq - in Baghdad.

BTW - Cash is the most easily manipulated financial metrc - just don&#039;t pay your creditors until the first of next month instead of the last of this month.

Major companies do it every month to manipulate their end-of-month reporting.

&quot;You probably don&#039;t realize that ROI uses asset value as part of its calculation. In fact, the most simple explanation of ROI is earnings compared to assets.&quot;

I know how to calculate ROI, I know how to manipulate financial stats if necessary and I know the true value of assets as they relate to ROI.

Like all other business metrics, ROI can be manipulated.

I would LOVE to continue this &quot;debate&quot; but I have to get up early in the morning.

I hope your banker enjoys your disdain for ROI......
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;You&#8217;re welcome. You got a free short-course in finance tonight.&#8221;</p>
<p>The day I need any help from you on anything and the day I thank you for anything will be the same day that Bush II gets invited to a Sunni-Shi&#8217;ite Celebration of the Invasion of Iraq &#8211; in Baghdad.</p>
<p>BTW &#8211; Cash is the most easily manipulated financial metrc &#8211; just don&#8217;t pay your creditors until the first of next month instead of the last of this month.</p>
<p>Major companies do it every month to manipulate their end-of-month reporting.</p>
<p>&#8220;You probably don&#8217;t realize that ROI uses asset value as part of its calculation. In fact, the most simple explanation of ROI is earnings compared to assets.&#8221;</p>
<p>I know how to calculate ROI, I know how to manipulate financial stats if necessary and I know the true value of assets as they relate to ROI.</p>
<p>Like all other business metrics, ROI can be manipulated.</p>
<p>I would LOVE to continue this &#8220;debate&#8221; but I have to get up early in the morning.</p>
<p>I hope your banker enjoys your disdain for ROI&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KSGolfnut</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/12/wage_gap_narrow/#comment-109780</link>
		<dc:creator>KSGolfnut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 06:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/12/wage_gap_narrowhtml/#comment-109780</guid>
		<description>Umm, Clark...do you realize what you just said?  You might want to rethink.

Like I said, you likely have no idea how to calculate an ROI.

You said &quot;ROI is the only true measure of a company&#039;s earning capabilities&quot;

Then you said &quot;Business asset value has nothing to do with earning capabilities&quot;

You probably don&#039;t realize that ROI uses asset value as part of its calculation.  In fact, the most simple explanation of ROI is earnings compared to assets.

Now, you&#039;ve said that the value of the assets mean nothing to a company&#039;s capability, but ROI is everything.  So, the only thing remaning is earnings.

Isn&#039;t that what I said in the beginning?  Earnings?  I use EBITDA because interest, tax, depreciation and amortization only cloud the issue when measuring operational execution.

Oh yeah - cash.  You said &quot;Cash on hand is probably the least valuable measure of a company&#039;s health&quot;

I can have the greatest month in the history of mankind - record sales, record deliveries, record revenue, all kinds of stuff that makes for a very healthy ROI - but if it&#039;s all on AR, then I&#039;ll have very little sympathy from my employees and vendors when I can&#039;t pay them.

The three most valuable words in business:  Cash Is King.

You&#039;re welcome.  You got a free short-course in finance tonight.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Umm, Clark&#8230;do you realize what you just said?  You might want to rethink.</p>
<p>Like I said, you likely have no idea how to calculate an ROI.</p>
<p>You said &#8220;ROI is the only true measure of a company&#8217;s earning capabilities&#8221;</p>
<p>Then you said &#8220;Business asset value has nothing to do with earning capabilities&#8221;</p>
<p>You probably don&#8217;t realize that ROI uses asset value as part of its calculation.  In fact, the most simple explanation of ROI is earnings compared to assets.</p>
<p>Now, you&#8217;ve said that the value of the assets mean nothing to a company&#8217;s capability, but ROI is everything.  So, the only thing remaning is earnings.</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t that what I said in the beginning?  Earnings?  I use EBITDA because interest, tax, depreciation and amortization only cloud the issue when measuring operational execution.</p>
<p>Oh yeah &#8211; cash.  You said &#8220;Cash on hand is probably the least valuable measure of a company&#8217;s health&#8221;</p>
<p>I can have the greatest month in the history of mankind &#8211; record sales, record deliveries, record revenue, all kinds of stuff that makes for a very healthy ROI &#8211; but if it&#8217;s all on AR, then I&#8217;ll have very little sympathy from my employees and vendors when I can&#8217;t pay them.</p>
<p>The three most valuable words in business:  Cash Is King.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re welcome.  You got a free short-course in finance tonight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WSClark</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/12/wage_gap_narrow/#comment-109779</link>
		<dc:creator>WSClark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 06:29:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/12/wage_gap_narrowhtml/#comment-109779</guid>
		<description>ROI - actual performance.

NPV - projected performance.

March 2003 - Iraqi Freedom.

December 2006 - what the hell do we do now?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ROI &#8211; actual performance.</p>
<p>NPV &#8211; projected performance.</p>
<p>March 2003 &#8211; Iraqi Freedom.</p>
<p>December 2006 &#8211; what the hell do we do now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WSClark</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/12/wage_gap_narrow/#comment-109778</link>
		<dc:creator>WSClark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 06:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/12/wage_gap_narrowhtml/#comment-109778</guid>
		<description>&quot;I don&#039;t measure ROI. I have two valuable metrics: EBITDA and cash.&quot;

quote - Golfnutz, business expert.

What the hell does it matter if you have a positive cash balance, a positive EBIT and a negative ROI?

How long do you think you would be in business with a negative ROI?

Basic business.....
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I don&#8217;t measure ROI. I have two valuable metrics: EBITDA and cash.&#8221;</p>
<p>quote &#8211; Golfnutz, business expert.</p>
<p>What the hell does it matter if you have a positive cash balance, a positive EBIT and a negative ROI?</p>
<p>How long do you think you would be in business with a negative ROI?</p>
<p>Basic business&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KSGolfnut</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/12/wage_gap_narrow/#comment-109777</link>
		<dc:creator>KSGolfnut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 06:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/12/wage_gap_narrowhtml/#comment-109777</guid>
		<description>&quot;ROI - the here and now.&quot;

I don&#039;t think you know how to calculate an ROI, Clark.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;ROI &#8211; the here and now.&#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think you know how to calculate an ROI, Clark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KSGolfnut</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/12/wage_gap_narrow/#comment-109776</link>
		<dc:creator>KSGolfnut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 06:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/12/wage_gap_narrowhtml/#comment-109776</guid>
		<description>Clark,WTF do you think an investment in a company is?  WTF do you think business valuation is?

FINANCIAL VALUATION OF A LONG-TERM PROJECT.

Thank you.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clark,WTF do you think an investment in a company is?  WTF do you think business valuation is?</p>
<p>FINANCIAL VALUATION OF A LONG-TERM PROJECT.</p>
<p>Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WSClark</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/12/wage_gap_narrow/#comment-109775</link>
		<dc:creator>WSClark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 06:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/12/wage_gap_narrowhtml/#comment-109775</guid>
		<description>&quot;Holy Cow where do you come up with this?&quot;

I already answered you, Nutz, and I will measure my business skills against your basement blog skills anytime.

BTW - Business asset value has nothing to do with earning capabilities - the value of land and machinery means nothing unless you intend to liquidate the business.

Like someone should liquidate &quot;your business.&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Holy Cow where do you come up with this?&#8221;</p>
<p>I already answered you, Nutz, and I will measure my business skills against your basement blog skills anytime.</p>
<p>BTW &#8211; Business asset value has nothing to do with earning capabilities &#8211; the value of land and machinery means nothing unless you intend to liquidate the business.</p>
<p>Like someone should liquidate &#8220;your business.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WSClark</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/12/wage_gap_narrow/#comment-109774</link>
		<dc:creator>WSClark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 06:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/12/wage_gap_narrowhtml/#comment-109774</guid>
		<description>&quot;Net present value (NPV) is a standard method for financial evaluation of long-term projects.&quot;

ROI - the here and now.

NPV - what I hope it will be.

ROI - take it to the bank......
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Net present value (NPV) is a standard method for financial evaluation of long-term projects.&#8221;</p>
<p>ROI &#8211; the here and now.</p>
<p>NPV &#8211; what I hope it will be.</p>
<p>ROI &#8211; take it to the bank&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KSGolfnut</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/12/wage_gap_narrow/#comment-109773</link>
		<dc:creator>KSGolfnut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 06:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/12/wage_gap_narrowhtml/#comment-109773</guid>
		<description>You certainly haven&#039;t addressed your earlier comment about expense v. income.

I&#039;m patiently waiting.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You certainly haven&#8217;t addressed your earlier comment about expense v. income.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m patiently waiting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KSGolfnut</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/12/wage_gap_narrow/#comment-109772</link>
		<dc:creator>KSGolfnut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 06:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/12/wage_gap_narrowhtml/#comment-109772</guid>
		<description>EBITDA is a measure of operational execution.  That&#039;s why it&#039;s an important metric.  Why do you not get that?

And, if earnings can be manipulated, so can the ROI.  After all, earnings are part of the ROI.

And here&#039;s another one you said:  &quot;ROI is the only true measure of a company&#039;s earning capabilities.&quot;

Are you sure you mean &quot;capability?&quot;

Clark, ROI has nothing to do with earning capability.  Zero.  Zip.  None.  Nil.  Nunca.

Holy Cow where do you come up with this?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EBITDA is a measure of operational execution.  That&#8217;s why it&#8217;s an important metric.  Why do you not get that?</p>
<p>And, if earnings can be manipulated, so can the ROI.  After all, earnings are part of the ROI.</p>
<p>And here&#8217;s another one you said:  &#8220;ROI is the only true measure of a company&#8217;s earning capabilities.&#8221;</p>
<p>Are you sure you mean &#8220;capability?&#8221;</p>
<p>Clark, ROI has nothing to do with earning capability.  Zero.  Zip.  None.  Nil.  Nunca.</p>
<p>Holy Cow where do you come up with this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WSClark</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/12/wage_gap_narrow/#comment-109771</link>
		<dc:creator>WSClark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 06:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/12/wage_gap_narrowhtml/#comment-109771</guid>
		<description>&quot;and my return was what&quot;

that was to have been....

&quot;and my return was (negative 10%)what&quot;

WE Blog doesn&#039;t like negative brackets....
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;and my return was what&#8221;</p>
<p>that was to have been&#8230;.</p>
<p>&#8220;and my return was (negative 10%)what&#8221;</p>
<p>WE Blog doesn&#8217;t like negative brackets&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
