Comments on: Internet provides end run around censors http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/12/internet_provid/ The Wichita Eagle Editorial Department Blog Mon, 23 Nov 2009 17:03:15 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2 hourly 1 By: WSClark http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/12/internet_provid/#comment-102755 WSClark Sun, 24 Dec 2006 03:45:53 +0000 http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/12/internet_providhtml/#comment-102755 No doobies so far tonight Nutz. I had to change the kitty litter first, which is like having to deal with you - nasty, stinking and revolting, but necessary or the whole place will stink. No doobies so far tonight Nutz. I had to change the kitty litter first, which is like having to deal with you – nasty, stinking and revolting, but necessary or the whole place will stink.

]]> By: KSGolfnut http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/12/internet_provid/#comment-102754 KSGolfnut Sun, 24 Dec 2006 03:41:42 +0000 http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/12/internet_providhtml/#comment-102754 heh, the resident drug addict is hittin' the doobs hard again tonight (obviously). heh, the resident drug addict is hittin’ the doobs hard again tonight (obviously).

]]> By: WSClark http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/12/internet_provid/#comment-102753 WSClark Sun, 24 Dec 2006 02:42:48 +0000 http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/12/internet_providhtml/#comment-102753 Who asked you, Nutz? Your e-mail address may be real, but you're not. Who asked you, Nutz? Your e-mail address may be real, but you’re not.

]]> By: KSGolfnut http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/12/internet_provid/#comment-102752 KSGolfnut Sun, 24 Dec 2006 02:39:59 +0000 http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/12/internet_providhtml/#comment-102752 i DO use a real email i DO use a real email

]]> By: WSClark http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/12/internet_provid/#comment-102751 WSClark Sun, 24 Dec 2006 02:39:48 +0000 http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/12/internet_providhtml/#comment-102751 Funny, Postal, that's funny. But doesn't ANY e-mail from Golfnut go directly to junk mail? Funny, Postal, that’s funny.

But doesn’t ANY e-mail from Golfnut go directly to junk mail?

]]> By: Postal http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/12/internet_provid/#comment-102750 Postal Sun, 24 Dec 2006 02:36:42 +0000 http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/12/internet_providhtml/#comment-102750 I would use my real email, but I'm terrified that someone from this blog might email me. Someone like Golfnuts. Or, scarier, Paul Rosell. I would use my real email, but I’m terrified that someone from this blog might email me. Someone like Golfnuts. Or, scarier, Paul Rosell.

]]> By: WSClark http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/12/internet_provid/#comment-102749 WSClark Sun, 24 Dec 2006 02:21:15 +0000 http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/12/internet_providhtml/#comment-102749 Still stalking, eh, Nutz? Of course, you would know all the angles, being our resident troll-stalker. Still stalking, eh, Nutz?

Of course, you would know all the angles, being our resident troll-stalker.

]]> By: KSGolfnut http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/12/internet_provid/#comment-102748 KSGolfnut Sun, 24 Dec 2006 02:13:07 +0000 http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/12/internet_providhtml/#comment-102748 Drug-boy,That would solve nothing. Getting 10-15 email addresses is no problem Drug-boy,That would solve nothing. Getting 10-15 email addresses is no problem

]]> By: WSClark http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/12/internet_provid/#comment-102747 WSClark Sun, 24 Dec 2006 01:44:05 +0000 http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/12/internet_providhtml/#comment-102747 It is bad enough when posters use imaginary e-mail addresses, but to not even bother to fake a nickname is even worse. This blog would be so much better if the e-mail addresses had to be real. No trolls, stalkers ID'ed. Much better. It is bad enough when posters use imaginary e-mail addresses, but to not even bother to fake a nickname is even worse.

This blog would be so much better if the e-mail addresses had to be real.

No trolls, stalkers ID’ed.

Much better.

]]> By: Postal http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/12/internet_provid/#comment-102746 Postal Sun, 24 Dec 2006 01:25:14 +0000 http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/12/internet_providhtml/#comment-102746 And, while I'm thinking about it, the Carr brothers got DEATH. What, beyond the death sentence, pray tell, would a hate crime sentence add? It just makes a case harder to prove. Besides, nobody buys hate crimes against us crackers, anyhow. And pornography is NOT illegal. In order to be considered illegal, it must first be proven obscene, which means that a majority of the people in a given location find it to be devoid of all merit. And given the fact that pornography is the largest subsegment of the entertainment industry, bigger than Hollywood, and much much bigger than your Perfect Peace stores and Family Christian, where are you going to find more than half of the people to say that porn lacks merit? You people are just so damned loud because you know that people won't come out in rampant support of something that is still considered to be 'blue.' The pro-porn rallies and groups are quiet and lawyer and industry based. Any inbred biblethumper can be antiporn. And, while I’m thinking about it, the Carr brothers got DEATH. What, beyond the death sentence, pray tell, would a hate crime sentence add? It just makes a case harder to prove. Besides, nobody buys hate crimes against us crackers, anyhow. And pornography is NOT illegal. In order to be considered illegal, it must first be proven obscene, which means that a majority of the people in a given location find it to be devoid of all merit. And given the fact that pornography is the largest subsegment of the entertainment industry, bigger than Hollywood, and much much bigger than your Perfect Peace stores and Family Christian, where are you going to find more than half of the people to say that porn lacks merit? You people are just so damned loud because you know that people won’t come out in rampant support of something that is still considered to be ‘blue.’

The pro-porn rallies and groups are quiet and lawyer and industry based. Any inbred biblethumper can be antiporn.

]]> By: Postal http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/12/internet_provid/#comment-102745 Postal Sun, 24 Dec 2006 01:20:12 +0000 http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/12/internet_providhtml/#comment-102745 However, now I know how to save money at Christmas. :) However, now I know how to save money at Christmas. :)

]]> By: Postal http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/12/internet_provid/#comment-102744 Postal Sun, 24 Dec 2006 01:18:17 +0000 http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/12/internet_providhtml/#comment-102744 Wow, Jan Beemer just doesn't want to use her name when she posts here, does she? Referring, of course, to the Dec. 23 post at 6:10 PM. Maybe she fears she'll be more publicly embarrased than when she got arrested just before the election. Wow, Jan Beemer just doesn’t want to use her name when she posts here, does she? Referring, of course, to the Dec. 23 post at 6:10 PM.

Maybe she fears she’ll be more publicly embarrased than when she got arrested just before the election.

]]> By: Anonymous http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/12/internet_provid/#comment-102743 Anonymous Sun, 24 Dec 2006 00:10:31 +0000 http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/12/internet_providhtml/#comment-102743 Is the ability of the Internet to get the truth out when the establishment censors it why The Eagle isn't allowing comments on Ron Sylvester's propaganda piece on Foulston's refusal to prosecute her pal Tiller? She doesn't prosecute pornographers, she doesn't prosecute abortionists, torture and mass murder by the Carr brothers wasn't considered a hate crime. Is there anything No Warrant Nola prosecutes? Is the ability of the Internet to get the truth out when the establishment censors it why The Eagle isn’t allowing comments on Ron Sylvester’s propaganda piece on Foulston’s refusal to prosecute her pal Tiller?

She doesn’t prosecute pornographers, she doesn’t prosecute abortionists, torture and mass murder by the Carr brothers wasn’t considered a hate crime. Is there anything No Warrant Nola prosecutes?

]]> By: Kev http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/12/internet_provid/#comment-102742 Kev Sat, 23 Dec 2006 22:21:41 +0000 http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/12/internet_providhtml/#comment-102742 Nothing wrong with it being on the internet. Something very wrong with it being on regular TV. Nothing wrong with it being on the internet. Something very wrong with it being on regular TV.

]]> By: political_mom http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/12/internet_provid/#comment-102741 political_mom Sat, 23 Dec 2006 20:38:41 +0000 http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/12/internet_providhtml/#comment-102741 Joe, I still watch SNL faithfully. Yeah some of the stuff is lame, but some of the old stuff was lame too. Raider? WTH? I think you went a little overboard there. Joe, I still watch SNL faithfully. Yeah some of the stuff is lame, but some of the old stuff was lame too.

Raider? WTH? I think you went a little overboard there.

]]> By: Doug http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/12/internet_provid/#comment-102740 Doug Sat, 23 Dec 2006 18:08:29 +0000 http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/12/internet_providhtml/#comment-102740 <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1dmVU08zVpA" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1dmVU08zVpA</a> It even gives instructions in the video to help the gifting impaired. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1dmVU08zVpA

It even gives instructions in the video to help the gifting impaired.

]]> By: Joe Williams http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/12/internet_provid/#comment-102739 Joe Williams Sat, 23 Dec 2006 18:05:52 +0000 http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/12/internet_providhtml/#comment-102739 SNL actually had a funny skit? Hasn't Jimmy Kimble been doing his weekly skit called "unneccsary censorship" for years? What about the South Park episode when they decided to say $hit about 300 times and they had a counter going on it. That was hilarious. SNL? I don't watch it and hardly does anybody else. They went lame many years ago. SNL actually had a funny skit?

Hasn’t Jimmy Kimble been doing his weekly skit called “unneccsary censorship” for years?

What about the South Park episode when they decided to say $hit about 300 times and they had a counter going on it. That was hilarious.

SNL? I don’t watch it and hardly does anybody else. They went lame many years ago.

]]> By: raider http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/12/internet_provid/#comment-102738 raider Sat, 23 Dec 2006 13:08:39 +0000 http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/12/internet_providhtml/#comment-102738 These two freaks will eventually end up in an asylum and they will suffer horrible and agonizing deaths. These two freaks will eventually end up in an asylum and they will suffer horrible and agonizing deaths.

]]> By: political_mom http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/12/internet_provid/#comment-102737 political_mom Sat, 23 Dec 2006 09:25:14 +0000 http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/12/internet_providhtml/#comment-102737 So? SNL comes on late at night. It's an adult program. I thought it was funny as hell with the censors. So?

SNL comes on late at night. It’s an adult program. I thought it was funny as hell with the censors.

]]>