In what could become a common occurrence, “Saturday Night Live” posted online a skit from last week’s show that it had to bleep many times during the televised broadcast. It is a song parody about two boy-band singers (including Justin Timberlake) who give their male anatomy as a present, the New York Times reported. Within days of being posted, millions of people watched the uncensored video. Other network shows are sure to follow.
Posted by Phillip Brownlee
-
Registered?
Commenting on WE Blog now requires you to be a Kansas.com member. Use the links above to register, if you haven't already, or to log in. -
Contact us
Daily Archives
-
Recent Comments
- Jed on Is Palin taking on too much?
- Predestined on Republican convention thread 9/4
- Chas on Open thread 9/4
- Predestined on Palin more than pulled it off
- Monkeyhawk on Palin more than pulled it off
- BlueJay on Palin more than pulled it off
- Regular on Palin more than pulled it off
- BlueJay on Palin more than pulled it off
- HLP on Republican convention thread 9/4
- Boxlock on Palin more than pulled it off
19 Comments
So?
SNL comes on late at night. It’s an adult program. I thought it was funny as hell with the censors.
These two freaks will eventually end up in an asylum and they will suffer horrible and agonizing deaths.
SNL actually had a funny skit?
Hasn’t Jimmy Kimble been doing his weekly skit called “unneccsary censorship” for years?
What about the South Park episode when they decided to say $hit about 300 times and they had a counter going on it. That was hilarious.
SNL? I don’t watch it and hardly does anybody else. They went lame many years ago.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1dmVU08zVpA
It even gives instructions in the video to help the gifting impaired.
Joe, I still watch SNL faithfully. Yeah some of the stuff is lame, but some of the old stuff was lame too.
Raider? WTH? I think you went a little overboard there.
Nothing wrong with it being on the internet. Something very wrong with it being on regular TV.
Is the ability of the Internet to get the truth out when the establishment censors it why The Eagle isn’t allowing comments on Ron Sylvester’s propaganda piece on Foulston’s refusal to prosecute her pal Tiller?
She doesn’t prosecute pornographers, she doesn’t prosecute abortionists, torture and mass murder by the Carr brothers wasn’t considered a hate crime. Is there anything No Warrant Nola prosecutes?
Wow, Jan Beemer just doesn’t want to use her name when she posts here, does she? Referring, of course, to the Dec. 23 post at 6:10 PM.
Maybe she fears she’ll be more publicly embarrased than when she got arrested just before the election.
However, now I know how to save money at Christmas.
And, while I’m thinking about it, the Carr brothers got DEATH. What, beyond the death sentence, pray tell, would a hate crime sentence add? It just makes a case harder to prove. Besides, nobody buys hate crimes against us crackers, anyhow. And pornography is NOT illegal. In order to be considered illegal, it must first be proven obscene, which means that a majority of the people in a given location find it to be devoid of all merit. And given the fact that pornography is the largest subsegment of the entertainment industry, bigger than Hollywood, and much much bigger than your Perfect Peace stores and Family Christian, where are you going to find more than half of the people to say that porn lacks merit? You people are just so damned loud because you know that people won’t come out in rampant support of something that is still considered to be ‘blue.’
The pro-porn rallies and groups are quiet and lawyer and industry based. Any inbred biblethumper can be antiporn.
It is bad enough when posters use imaginary e-mail addresses, but to not even bother to fake a nickname is even worse.
This blog would be so much better if the e-mail addresses had to be real.
No trolls, stalkers ID’ed.
Much better.
Drug-boy,That would solve nothing. Getting 10-15 email addresses is no problem
Still stalking, eh, Nutz?
Of course, you would know all the angles, being our resident troll-stalker.
I would use my real email, but I’m terrified that someone from this blog might email me. Someone like Golfnuts. Or, scarier, Paul Rosell.
Funny, Postal, that’s funny.
But doesn’t ANY e-mail from Golfnut go directly to junk mail?
i DO use a real email
Who asked you, Nutz? Your e-mail address may be real, but you’re not.
heh, the resident drug addict is hittin’ the doobs hard again tonight (obviously).
No doobies so far tonight Nutz. I had to change the kitty litter first, which is like having to deal with you - nasty, stinking and revolting, but necessary or the whole place will stink.