An Arab crowd turns hostile for Bush 41

It’s one thing to have your old man defend you from bullies when you’re in, say, the third grade. It’s another thing when you’re president of the United States.
Former President Bush was forced to stick up for his son at a leadership conference in Abu Dhabi, where the Arab audience had unkind words for the current president’s foreign policy.
“We do not respect your son,” one woman told the stunned ex-president as the audience cheered.
“This son is not going to back away,” the elder Bush replied, his voice quivering. “This is going to work out in Iraq.”
Well, we’ll see. But encountering such a tough crowd in what was once a friendly venue has to be sobering — both for the father Bush and his embattled son.
Posted by Dave Knadler

116 Comments

  1. Dennis
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 11:14 am | Permalink

    Obviously everybody else in the world is smarter than the Bush clan. It wil be fun to watch it wither away, unnoticed, uncared for. History will not treat the clan well.

  2. ken
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 11:24 am | Permalink

    Unfortunatley there is another Bush who thinks he has a plan and a chance — stop the Bush attempt at Dynasty — they have proven themselves not up to the task ….

    Leaders they are not –

  3. Ian Santiago
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 11:28 am | Permalink

    I hope that this is the end of the bush crime family. I sure don’t want to see jeb running for office again, or his hideous half beaner son for that matter.

    Viva La Raza Blanco!!!

  4. Jim G.
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 11:34 am | Permalink

    Bush 43 is a rarity in modern Leadership – he is a complete failure and his bumbling public speaking skills tell the greater truth. He doesn’t ‘just’ have a problem giving speeches and speaking off-the-cuff, he has the brain of a person who cannot fix this problem. How incompetent can a person be if given 8 years to correct a poorly developed skill and they do not get any better.I think Dubya envisioned himself as a talking head – reading scripts, saying what his handles tell him.I feel a strong sense of being duped by the GOP.Bush 41 will face the outrage of the public if he continues to give speeches.

  5. Jim G.
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 11:38 am | Permalink

    ….oops, I forgot, Bush is a wonderful strong Christian so I should withhold criticism or risk my being labeled an infidel by the religious right.

  6. Posted November 22, 2006 at 11:48 am | Permalink

    It speaks volumes that Bush 41 would be “stunned” by this “revelation.”

    His son’s approval ratings are down to 30 some percent with very strong disapproval rating about the same.

    The only people who don’t know that “we don’t respect your son” are the Bush family apparently.

    WORST. PRESIDENT. EVER.

  7. ksfarmgrrl
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 12:14 pm | Permalink

    Well hell capn, poopy, I mean poppy was STUNNED by modern checkout technology at the grocery store.

    Why wouldnt he be stunned by a few otherthings.

    bubble living is as bubble living does.

    I am sure babs doesnt waste her “beautiful mind” on the issue for one minute….

    heheheheh

  8. Pam D
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 12:18 pm | Permalink

    Poppy and Babs should have shipped him off somewere when they lost their girl. They were not fit to raise honest children as they are all products of the Nazi’s…

    Google Prescott Bush and NAZI if you don’t believe it

  9. Rage
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 12:54 pm | Permalink

    http://www.amazon.com/American-Dynasty-Aristocracy-Fortune-Politics/dp/0670032646

  10. Ian Santiago
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 12:58 pm | Permalink

    I really wish that you moronic leftists would stop using the terms Nazi and/or Fascist to describe the traitor shrub and the neo-cons. You make yourselves look foolish.

    V.L.R.B!!

  11. WSClark
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 1:04 pm | Permalink

    No, Santiago, you make yourself look foolish with every one of your posts.

  12. political_mom
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 1:06 pm | Permalink

    You know what guys, I absolutely despise President Bush Jr. I still didn’t agree with Bush Sr.’s policies, but overall, I don’t consider him to be NEARLY as evil as his son. Maybe I’m wrong about this, I could be, but I don’t remember him doing anything quite so outlandish as his son has done. Last I knew, Sr still respected the constitution, and is a much better representative of his faith than his money grubbin, oil guzzling, power hungry son.

  13. WSClark
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 1:14 pm | Permalink

    Bush I was tolerable other than Iran Contra and the October 1980 Iranian Hostage surprise and the economic downturn and Willie Horton…..

    Well, maybe Bush I wasn’t so tolerable.

    At least he was better than Bush, the Sequel.

    I guess that is saying something in a kind of left-handed way.

    Viva America!

  14. ksfarmgrrl
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 1:21 pm | Permalink

    Bush the elder was just smoother and more “gentlemanly” than the shrubster.

    He still had a little more polish. Bush the lesser is crass enough not only to chew with his mouth open and speak with his mouth full, but he doesnt even HIDE his distain for anyone who isnt him.

    I think it is just that the ol’ man is a little better with the slight of hand and working the system than junior.

  15. gster
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 1:31 pm | Permalink

    I could at least listen to Sr’s speeches, etc. I can’t take the shrub at all, not only is it insulting, but it’s downright embarassing!

  16. RD
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 1:33 pm | Permalink

    TEE HEE

  17. fleettwood
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 1:35 pm | Permalink

    I’ll tell you what’s sobering. It’s Knadler and all the rest of you lefties not standing up for America when the Arabs in Abu Dhabi insult our current and former Presidents. For you people, it’s just another opportunity to get smirky. Bush the First was a guest in their country and they chose to be rude. Where is the outrage?

  18. J R
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 1:36 pm | Permalink

    Mama wore the pants in that family. If it had been her at this event, she might have attacked the offending speaker!

    I remember when Bush 41 was elected. He said, “For those who didn’t vote for me, I want to be your President too.”

    See that was a kindness extended. I took it that way anyway.

    After the election was handed to him in an unfair fight, bush 43 said “A President of the United States is President of ALL the people.”

    Which was clearly meant as “It’s mine! Suck on it!”

  19. WSClark
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 1:41 pm | Permalink

    “insult our current and former Presidents”

    Maybe if they (the Bushies) gave us something to support we would be behind them.

    Until then, I could not give a damn who insults them.

  20. KSGolfnut
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 1:45 pm | Permalink

    As usual, the libs are looking rearward.

  21. gster
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 1:45 pm | Permalink

    Fleettwood- The current President insulted the former one by his actions. The Shrub earned it all by himself, it’s no one else’s fault.

  22. WSClark
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 1:53 pm | Permalink

    “As usual, the libs are looking rearward.”

    I only look rearward when she’s really good looking.

    But I do have a memory.

  23. Steven Davis
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 2:08 pm | Permalink

    “As usual, the libs are looking rearward.”

    Clark you beat me to commenting on this gem. I was going to say it is better than having your head in that position.

  24. fleettwood
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 2:22 pm | Permalink

    I would hope that you people could at least unite behind our President(s) when they are being disrespected by people in another country. You wonder why your patritoism is questioned?Lib = on anyone’s side who hates Bush. Anyone’s.

  25. gster
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 2:24 pm | Permalink

    I think it’s called free speech. Haven’t you ever heard any of our presidents talking about other leaders in a less than flattering manner? I have.

  26. sunny
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 2:29 pm | Permalink

    Why are you all so surprised by Bush Sr defending his son? The nut did not fall too far from the nut tree.

    Bush Sr did his dirty deeds while in office but because he and Barbara (the grandmother type) looked so innocent, nobody knew what was really going on.

    Bush Jr is not that innocent looking and once he speaks, the truth is bound to come out. You cannot hid dumb.

  27. outlander
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 2:40 pm | Permalink

    Fleettwood nailed it. I really hate to say it because y’all get upset, but you keep showing that Libs are unpatriotic.

    Why? Reason 42: Because you will side with foreigners against your president. It’s like siding against your own brother that you don’t like.

    If some foreign national had criticized Bill Clinton, as much as I didn’t care for the man, I would have told them to mind their own business.

  28. WSClark
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 2:49 pm | Permalink

    “If some foreign national had criticized Bill Clinton, as much as I didn’t care for the man, I would have told them to mind their own business.”

    Bullshit – your side called our duly elected President a scumbag – Dick Burton – (R-Jerk)

    And it doesn’t make a damn difference if he was from Indiana or India.

    Nice try, but thanks for playing the game.

  29. political_mom
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 2:58 pm | Permalink

    If you note, the audience did NOT bash Sr. Bush, they bashed the current Bush. And why should I care when I say the exact same things? Hell, our ALLIES say the same exact things. It is not being unpatriotic to defend America, and right now, I FEEL the need to defend her against our own President!

    Bush Sr stood up for his son, and I’d expect that. Unfortunately nobody believes his words either, because HIS OWN credibility has been diminished because of the actions of the son.

    Be patriotic and GET HIM OUT OF OFFICE before he ruins our whole country!

  30. KSGolfnut
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 3:40 pm | Permalink

    “GET HIM OUT OF OFFICE”

    lmao

    crazy woman

  31. Pam D
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 3:41 pm | Permalink

    I wouldnt’ care if bushy 43 was the king of america or god. HE is the most inept corrupt fratboy America has ever seen and I will NOT support him and will do all I can to make sure that the Democratic party takes control of our White House in 2008 so that we can have some semblence of adulthood and honesty.

    You people better start paying attention before shrubby screws up anything else in the constitution

  32. Rage
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 3:44 pm | Permalink

    “If some foreign national had criticized Bill Clinton, as much as I didn’t care for the man, I would have told them to mind their own business.”

    Sigh. . . I knew I should have stayed away. Oh well.

    What if the foreign national was right, Outie? By what surreal process of reasoning is criticism of a U.S. official automatically off-limits, just because the person making the criticism doesn’t happen to be a resident of this country?

    Let’s assume for a moment that foreigners are all are gay, socialist, terrorist-loving. . whatever. . .all the standard conservative bugaboos. Does that mean they can’t ever say anything right?

    To paraphrase a previous post by Ben, if an arab says 2 + 2 = 4, are we compelled to disagree?

    How would agreeing with that be unpatriotic? Show your work.

  33. Rage
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 3:48 pm | Permalink

    BTW, I regard criticism of this poisonous would-be-dictator as the epitome of patriotism.

    Choke on it.

  34. J R
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 3:55 pm | Permalink

    Outie, woody and goofball show it ALL.

    The mindset of you boys is why bush went to war with Iraq.

    Nothing unifies like war. A p(resident) absolutlely despised by half the nation found unity on a rubble pile in New York city. Well he had to try and keep that unity. Voila….war. Everybody close ranks behind the thief in chief!

    Sorry. Most of us can see through it.

  35. JM
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 4:00 pm | Permalink

    Guess Dave Knadler figured it was time to feed the crocodiles.

  36. outlander
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 4:13 pm | Permalink

    Criticism is fine, coming from Americans. To agree with foreigners against one of your own, even if you think they are right, is unpatriotic. Period.

    The Hugo Chavez fiasco is another example.

  37. fleettwood
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 4:17 pm | Permalink

    It may be a bit like Black folks are allowed to use the N word with each other, but White folks can’t.The above Clinton reference is correct. I was (am not) a fan of Clinton, but some foreign bastard can shut up about him.Libs = Will get in bed with anybody who hates Bush. Anybody.

  38. gster
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 4:19 pm | Permalink

    Maybe you’re right, if you’re looking at the world through a knothole.

  39. WSClark
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 4:26 pm | Permalink

    “is unpatriotic”

    Don’t even think about calling me unpatriotic, outlander.

    Don’t even ^&*(&*( think about it.

    You have no %^&*() right to challenge MY patriotism.

    That is disgusting – beyond words.

  40. fleettwood
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 4:28 pm | Permalink

    The truth is a brutal bitch. Embrace it.

  41. WSClark
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 4:31 pm | Permalink

    “The truth is a brutal bitch. Embrace it.”

    On what grounds do you challenge my patriotism, fleet? On what grounds do you challenge my right as an American to criticize the POTUS?

    That is my right – he is the President, not the phucking King!

    What right do you have to suggest that I am less patriotic than you or anyone else?

  42. WSClark
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 4:37 pm | Permalink

    “if you’re looking at the world through a knothole.”

    G, I think that they are looking at the world through another HOLE.

  43. fleettwood
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 4:40 pm | Permalink

    You are pleased to being critizing the POTUS all you wish.That was not the point and I thing you know it. When Arabs are rude to our President(s) and the Libs can only agree and do not think that what they did was wrong, then that is not patriotic. “Bush may be a dope, but he’s our dope, so shut the F up” is what you people should be posting. But your hatred is blinding.Libs = blind

  44. Jim G.
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 4:40 pm | Permalink

    I think we should just trust Britney Spears.

  45. Jim G.
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 4:41 pm | Permalink

    Funny, the GOP impeached a Rhodes Scholar and the GOP stands up for a Delta House prodigy.

  46. Jim G.
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 4:43 pm | Permalink

    Fleetwood Crack,there were NO weapons of mass distruction. HANS BLIX SAID SO.The Arabs have every right to criticize our president – he invaded their turf. He profits from their oil.

  47. gster
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 4:43 pm | Permalink

    WSC- Yup- I thought about that right after I posted.

  48. fleettwood
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 4:50 pm | Permalink

    The Rhodes Scholar committed perjury.I have tried to give you people every chance to get on the right side of this.Libs = unpatriotic, America hating commies

  49. WSClark
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 4:51 pm | Permalink

    “Bush may be a dope, but he’s our dope”

    Nope, fleet, he’s YOUR dope and I don’t claim him.

    As many a famous Republican said during impeachment…..

    “I respect the office of the presidency, but I don’t have to respect the man in the office.”

    Again, who the hell are you to challenge my patriotism?

    The SOB (yes, I just called the President of the United States a Son-of-a-bitch) is not our king – he is an elected SERVANT.

    And he sucks as a servant.

    I owe nothing to GWB.

  50. WSClark
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 4:55 pm | Permalink

    BTW – fleet – Hugo Chavez is the democratically elected leader of his country – did you protest when HE was criticized?

    The UN building in New York is NOT US property – it is a diplomatic sanctuary, so he was free to say whatever he wanted.

    Did you defend him?

  51. fleettwood
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 4:59 pm | Permalink

    Are you dense or what?It’s not about Americans critizing Bush.If you won’t say the Arabs or anyone else shouldn’t be rude to ourPresident(s), then you are wrong. Period. I get the feeling that you must be a high schooler or something.

  52. Jim G.
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 4:59 pm | Permalink

    I wish more voices would speak up about this dope. I truly believe we are watching the dumbest president ever. I said truly. I cannot recall another president who is clearly just a complete dumbass. Dan Quayle was closest as the 2nd in line. By the way, everyone realized what a dope Qualyle was – he hasn’t been heard of since. The GOP doesn’t want that dumb SOB speaking up for the president because it would be like the movie “Dumb and Dumber.”It is not some lib blindness – this pres. is just one big dumb SOB – and he has been manipulated by Cheney the entire 6 years.As for perjury – let the hearings begin!! We’ll see who lied about what.Reagan, Bush Sr., Col. North….the list goes on about proven liars.FLEETWOOD – Clinton lied about sex – and that didn’t kill 2,000+ American soldiers. Bush lied about WMD’s and look at the suffering he has caused.Patriotism does not mean we suck the asshole of the asshole.

  53. Jim G.
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 5:04 pm | Permalink

    Fleettwood,I can see you now…Bush is walking from the White House in shame…and you are running to him, crying, dropping to your knees and grabbing his leg, and telling him you love him and know he did nk wrong. The ex-pres looks down and says to his security – “get him out of here” and Bush says to Rove, “let’s get going, I am meeting Bandar in the Carribean.”

  54. WSClark
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 5:04 pm | Permalink

    Actually, Fleet I am 54 years old – does that bother you?

    But I will ask again, you the hell are you to challenge my patriotism?

    BTW – did you invent the Fleet Enema or are you just a habitual user?

    I am guessing that you are a user since you are so full of shit.

  55. WSClark
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 5:06 pm | Permalink

    That was “who the hell are you …”

  56. Jim G.
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 5:06 pm | Permalink

    Fleet enema’s are very useful for constipated elephants.

    Viva La Poo poo

  57. WSClark
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 5:08 pm | Permalink

    “Fleet enema’s are very useful for constipated elephants.”

    Funny!!!!!!!

    Thank you, I needed a good laugh!

  58. political_mom
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 5:09 pm | Permalink

    Fleets, Did you think the other nations were wrong for LOVING Clinton? Hm?

  59. Jim G.
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 5:09 pm | Permalink

    Fleettwood Crap,You got back at all those high school bullies by inventing the grab-n-go enema, didn’t you.

  60. Jim G.
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 5:11 pm | Permalink

    Bush has fucked up so much that Clinton’s legacy is beginning to emerge from the fog.

  61. Jim G.
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 5:16 pm | Permalink

    Fleet Enema’s”Just squeez’em, hold’em, and release!”Ask for them by name.

  62. steve
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 5:18 pm | Permalink

    If the Saudi’s end their friendship with the Bush clan, it’s all over for Jr. MOney’s thicker than blood for Bush’s.

  63. Jim G.
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 5:19 pm | Permalink

    Political Mom,You are adorable.

  64. ken
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 5:21 pm | Permalink

    The Bush’s have been in bed with the Arabs for years fleetwood — that shold piss you off, they harbored Al Qaeda and funded terrorist training — and the bush’s knew it —- you are such a livid blind moron —

    For a stress reliever go here:

    http://www.toddalbert.com/files/images/bushsmack.swf

  65. outlander
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 5:51 pm | Permalink

    Fleettwood, you tried. But it’s as if English is a second language to some posting this thread; considering the responses you have received. It does prove your previous point though, if I may quote;

    “Lib = on anyone’s side who hates Bush. Anyone’s.”

  66. outlander
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 5:52 pm | Permalink

    PM: Would you please stop posting into the future?

  67. JM
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 5:53 pm | Permalink

    Unbelievable. I’m so disappointed in you people.

  68. KSGolfnut
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 5:53 pm | Permalink

    I give liberals credit for being very good at playing the victim, and PeeMom is no exception.

    It’s always someone else’s fault and someone else’s bad behavior and someone else’s poor planning…

    i.e. It’s not her fault that she got kicked out of nursing school for cheating…

    It’s never the fault of the employee when he get fired.

    One thing liberals NEED to succeed: victims.

  69. J R
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 5:57 pm | Permalink

    I think the problem the followers of bush have here is they do not have a counter example. They don’t have a Democrat President that was verbally attacked by a foreignperson or leader. Maybe a little clue as to foreign relations there?

    Look let’s make this simple. You bushies are real bottom line kinda folks correct?

    Here’s how it adds up where I sit.

    bush has done nothing to help me. He HAS done a considerable number of things that have actually hurt me.

    I have a young child. bush has the most powerful position in the world to make the world a brighter future for my kid. He has made the world many times many ways a considerably more dangerous place for my kid to live in.

    Last but far from finally? I don’t like the guy. I would not like him if he were a dog catcher or a short order cook or a teller at a small bank. I find him a narrow minded, self aggrandizing bore.

    I do NOT want the world to see and hear bush and think HE represents the average American.

    bush’s problem with more than half of Americans and most of the world is his own mess. He’s earned his criticism. I will NOT stand up for him continuing to be an idiot.

    Got the math now?

  70. political_mom
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 6:00 pm | Permalink

    Testicles I DID NOT CHEAT!

    I DID NOT I DID NOT!

    You say that just to be a dickhead instead of addressing what I was talking about. And you, you are a LIAR. I’m 100x’s better of a person than you are.

    Outlander, I don’t know why I’m posting into the future, guess I’m just that good lol.

    And Jim, I’m adorable? Explain? Can you see me? LOL.

  71. Ben Huie
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 6:13 pm | Permalink

    Some comments:

    “It’s like siding against your own brother that you don’t like.” – if my brother were a criminal who assaulted my neighbor I would do just that.

    ” I would have told them to mind their own business.” It IS their business. Bush invaded and occupied a country in their region. He has deliberately and with malice aforethought destabalized the region.

    “To agree with foreigners against one of your own, even if you think they are right, is unpatriotic. Period.” So, if a German in the 30s faced someone criticizing Hitler he must defend Hitler? Not me.

    Cons = would defend Adolph Hitler if he were one of theirs.

  72. political_mom
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 6:16 pm | Permalink

    I think I know what Fleetwood Mac (actually I like Fleetwood Mac, so back to Fleets Enema) is trying to say, although I don’t agree with it. Now if the Arabs shot him, yeah, I’d have an issue.

    It was like when Ronald Reagan died. It was a sad day for America no matter what side of the fence you stood on. I didn’t like Reagan as president, but I never really felt he did anything but what he felt was right.

    When the SJ forum was up at that time, I asked that all be JUST AMERICANS for one day (the day Reagan was laid to rest). Do you know who the butts were that ruined it?

    The Reagan Supporters. They just had to be as nasty that day to democrats as any other day. So I don’t wanna hear about how unpatriotic we are for agreeing with other nations- for speaking their mind against what is happening to their own people right now.

  73. outlander
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 6:17 pm | Permalink

    PM: Would you please stop posting into the future?

  74. political_mom
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 6:22 pm | Permalink

    I just got insight into the republicon world. Siding against your brother even if he did something wrong….

    That is what it’s all about to them, loyalty at any and all costs. Everyone else is a traitor. It’s never about doing the RIGHT thing.

  75. RD
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 7:11 pm | Permalink

    So it’s okay for Dubya to call other leaders the Axis of Evil, but it’s not okay for another leader to point out his shortcomings?

    Oh, boo-hoo! Let’s send mama to beat up the bully.

  76. mrcontroversy
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 7:12 pm | Permalink

    If only blogging had been around during the Clinton administration… what GLORIOUS bone digs we could have about now!

  77. RD
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 7:14 pm | Permalink

    “Reason 42: Because you will side with foreigners against your president. It’s like siding against your own brother that you don’t like.”

    This has nothing to do with choosing sides, it has to do with agreeing with someone’s opinion.

    Respect must be earned, and Dubya hasn’t done a thing to earn mine. Obviously that woman felt the same.

  78. WSClark
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 7:29 pm | Permalink

    “If only blogging had been around during the Clinton administration… what GLORIOUS bone digs we could have about now!”

    Are still fixated on Clinton’s bone?

  79. Pedant
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 8:20 pm | Permalink

    Bush 43 is a total, utter, complete dipshit.

    There is no way to pour hollandaise over dipshit and have it smell appetizing. In short, there is NOTHING wrong with calling a spade a spade and a dipshit a dipshit.

    If you respect dipshits, fine. Tomorrow morning, I myself will resume discourse with a couple who reside in the buxom of my family, and that’s cool. My dipshit cousins are not politicians, however. They’re not even managers of other humans, and for good reason: they’re dipshits. Neither are they mayors, and neither are they state representatives nor are they state senators.

    In short, my dipshit cousins are rightly called dipshits because they are foolish and occasionally contemptible. Just like Bush.

    Unfortunately, unlike my dipshit cousins, the dipshit Bush is President of the United States of America.

    Equally unfortunately for us Americans who choose to defend dipshits as mayors — and you know this applies geometrically to us Americans who defend dipshits as President — there is no shame in calling a dipshit a dipshit when the shoe fits the mayor’s foot.

    Unfortunately it fits the President of the United States foot like a glove.

  80. WSClark
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 8:24 pm | Permalink

    You have dipshit relatives, too, Pedant?

    I’ve got a boatload, myself.

  81. Pedant
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 8:32 pm | Permalink

    It is a heavy burden we bear, WSClark. ;)

    Not NEARLY as big a burden as Bush 43 apologists/cultists bear, but big enough.

    Happy holidays everybody!

  82. J R
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 8:35 pm | Permalink

    Well what do we have here.

    mmm outie….still the bushbot I see.

    Fleet whatever. Guy you oughtta take blogging 101 or something. I’ll give that your posts are short. Much like your vocabulary I expect.

    And we got golf nuts.

    Fella? I’m starting to take a real dislike to you.

    You wanna dish out the attacks you best get ready to defend yourself country clubber.

    In terms you can understand? FORE!

    YOU posted elsewhere that you are a businessman. THIS means that you make your dime off the back of someone else. You got a lotta nerve attacking someone who works for a living.

    See” This is why we hate that sonofabitch bush. Dilute down to his unapologetic blind sheep and ya find a pretty unrespectable slick of the worst among us.

  83. Ben Huie
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 8:46 pm | Permalink

    Here is a question to ponder: If you knew that your brother was a serial killer would you turn him in? Would you “siding against your own brother”? I know I would. Apparently there are those who would work to protect and enable him.

    Reps = would enable a serial killer if family

    Ain’t that right fleettwood and outlander.

    “another opportunity to get smirky” – yep, they did get ol’ smirky didn’t they? Thanks for Bush’s new nickname.

  84. Will
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 8:52 pm | Permalink

    To all of you “you’re not an American if you don’t side with your President” dickheads, I have a message for you:

    Fuck… You… All!

    Just because I don’t kiss the Connecticut Cowboy’s ass and worship the ground he walks on just because he’s the president despite the fact that he’s a complete and total neanderthal, doesn’t mean that I or anyone else is being un-American! Criticism of those in power are inevitable, and when you wage a war based on fubarred intelligence with no exit plan, you best be prepared to take the criticism by the world community like a big boy!

  85. Pedant
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 9:00 pm | Permalink

    I mean, NEWSFLASH: when you call forth your Head Minions to tell the world that you know EXACTLY the place in Iraq that weapons of mass distruction can be found, when you promise the world that you hold GPS-quality ‘truth’

    ….but the WMD you promised were never where you swore they were…

    ….and you don’t resign over it…

    ….and you never even bother to scapegoat any of your Head Minions…

    Then DUH, you get merely a SLIVER of what by all rights known to right-thinking humans you COMPLETELY deserve: your father is insulted publicly by Arabs.

    And then you cry about it and try to bait those who recognize a dipshit when they see one.

    LOL

    I mean the world ain’t perfect but it does function properly on occasion.

  86. Postal
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 9:05 pm | Permalink

    Who is this Pedant, and why do I like his posting so very much??

    Sarcasm + Tired of Bullshizzleness = funny.

  87. Postal
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 9:09 pm | Permalink

    And I’m extremely thankful that all the dipshits in my family will be conspicuously absent at tomorrow’s feast (I’m NOT going to my inlaws!!!)

    :)

    Happy Thanksgiving, Bloggers. Even Paul Rosell.

  88. Pedant
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 9:09 pm | Permalink

    Thanks Postal. It’s the Dylan, imo. ;)

  89. Pam D
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 9:10 pm | Permalink

    bush jr thinks he is at one huge frat party and we the Americans are suffering mightily for it

    2009 can not come soon enough

    bush and his cohorts should be in the Hague

  90. outlander
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 9:36 pm | Permalink

    Just to close my thoughts on this, I recall again the comments of that clown Hugo Chavez, and the Amens he got from the left in this country.Putting politics above national pride and honor like this is what I find unpatriotic.

    But liberals, conservatives and all in between, Happy Thanksgiving. I am thankful that we are privileged to live in the greatest country in the world, where we can freely express our opinions in forums like this one.

  91. WSClark
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 9:41 pm | Permalink

    National pride, outlander? What has Bush done to make us proud?

    I used to be proud of our President – when his name was Clinton.

    The world and the US loved Bill Clinton.

    Remember – 67% approval rating on the day the partisan Republican impeached him?

    The world and the US hates Bush.

    Remember – 31% approaval rating.

    It’s not politics, outlander, it’s survival.

  92. Ben Huie
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 9:54 pm | Permalink

    So, out of pride we should blindly support Bush no matter how much damage he does to our country. We should also enable a brother who is a serial killer out of family loyalty.

    No, true patriotisn is placing country above love of Party or personality. The patriotic German was the one sho tried to stand up against Hitler, not the one who loyally followed his Fuhrer out of pride and loyalty.

  93. Ben Huie
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 9:56 pm | Permalink

    Sadly, I must acknowledge that Hugo Chavez was right. Bush’s high crimes and misdemeanors bring shame upon the country that I love.

  94. outlander
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 10:01 pm | Permalink

    Sigh… WS, Ben, you guys make me tired. Where do you get this bit about pride in our president? I am not referring to pride in our president or even support for our president or any other leader. I am talking about pride in our country. I don’t need a great president who I completely agree with to make me proud of my country! I am sorry that you don’t understand.

  95. Pedant
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 10:05 pm | Permalink

    Happy Thanksgiving Day, outlander.

    Watch out for the leg bones, they’re killer sometimes!

    Peace.

  96. Posted November 22, 2006 at 10:06 pm | Permalink

    “The President is merely the most important among a large number of public servants. He should be supported or opposed exactly to the degree which is warranted by his good conduct or bad conduct, his efficiency or inefficiency in rendering loyal, able, and disinterested service to the Nation as a whole. Therefore it is absolutely necessary that there should be full liberty to tell the truth about his acts, and this means that it is exactly necessary to blame him when he does wrong as to praise him when he does right. Any other attitude in an American citizen is both base and servile. To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public. Nothing but the truth should be spoken about him or any one else. But it is even more important to tell the truth, pleasant or unpleasant, about him than about any one else.”

    Teddy Roosevelt in the Kansas City StarMay 7, 1918

  97. Posted November 22, 2006 at 10:13 pm | Permalink

    “This is going to work out in Iraq,” says George Sr.

    Other than Halliburton and the other war profiteers, exactly who is working out for?

    Latest polls show 74 percent of the Shia and 91 percent of the Sunnis want US troops out now.

    WORST. PRESIDENT. EVER.

  98. Ben Huie
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 10:17 pm | Permalink

    Problem is outlander, you sem to equate them. After all, you equate an attack on Bush with an attack on our country; I do not. If Bush is wrong then anyone, here or elsewhere, should be allowed to say so. Similarly, I will attack leaders of other countries if THEY are wrong; that is not then an attack on that country or its people.

  99. Ben Huie
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 10:18 pm | Permalink

    an addendum – being called unpatriotic for not defending Bush’s pride? Sorry, I reject that as well.

  100. WSClark
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 10:21 pm | Permalink

    Well said, Ben. I was going to post a reply to outlander, but you have said it all.

    Viva America!

    God Bless Our Home!

  101. Ben Huie
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 10:30 pm | Permalink

    And remember, God Bless America is a prayer, not a command!

  102. steve
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 10:57 pm | Permalink

    Maybe they don’t like Bush Jr. because 100,000 Iraqies are having to flee abroad every month to get out of their war torn country. How long will it take before there’s nobody left but the U.S. and Al-quida?

  103. steve
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 10:58 pm | Permalink

    A dumbass is still a dumbass, no matter who calls it.

  104. J M Walker
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 10:59 pm | Permalink

    I believe outlander is confusing the president with the presidency. I have the upmost respect for the presidency, as the office holds the leader of this country. However, I do not have to respect the man who holds that office. Big difference.

  105. Ben Huie
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 11:02 pm | Permalink

    Steve – the more likely result will be the de facto partition of the country between Iran and Syria. Kurdistan will likely be crushed once again as Turkey will help do that. Bush’s “axis of evil” will be the big winner.

    I think one of the concerns of the Gulf states is that the balance of power that had existed there (Syria and Iran vs Iraq) has been destroyed. The ‘axis’ of Syria-Iraq-Iran will dominate the Gulf, especially with Bush’s Wahabi friends ascending in Saudi Arabia.

    MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!

  106. Ben Huie
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 11:05 pm | Permalink

    Well put JM. Where I work I do not expect my subordinates to “respect” me because of my position. I do, however, hope that I EARN their respect by way of my skills and abilities. Ant THAT, by the way, leads to REAL loyalty on their part.

  107. mrcontroversy
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 11:27 pm | Permalink

    WSC–I’m not obsessed, but it would be interesting to see what FleetEnema would have said when Thao Mbeki criticized Clinton during a state visit back when we HAD a president.

  108. Jim G.
    Posted November 22, 2006 at 11:36 pm | Permalink

    Capn America-ref. your Teddy Roosevelt quote several blogs ago; I have no doubt that GWB is incapable of articulating such a simple profound statement as T.R.’s quote.Clinton could have said that; GHWB could have said that; Reagan could have said that; but Dubya is the only President who can attempt to quote an old idiom “Fool me once….” and sweeps into quoting a Who song “…won’t get fooled again.”

    To sum up Dubya in Texas speak: you can’t polish a turd.

  109. Rage
    Posted November 23, 2006 at 12:14 am | Permalink

    Not the first time it’s been said, Walker, but I’m glad you said it anyway. I was little too peeved to be so genteel.

    I would add only that fearing criticism by foreign nationals (for Chrissakes, they weren’t even government officials!) is sign of incredible weakness, and arrogance.

    We might remember that this nation was founded with “a decent respect to the opinions of mankind.”

    http://www.law.indiana.edu/uslawdocs/declaration.html

  110. Wiseman
    Posted November 23, 2006 at 12:53 am | Permalink

    The only interest that the common man in the U.S. has that involves the Middle East is just the oil.There is nothing else that the Middle East has to offer that would affect me.I do not care about how they want to live their life, culture or religion.All this stuff about what they are doing over there did not and does not change anything in the course of my day, my day is the same with them or without them.That is the truth of how I feel about it.Also I do not like the Bush clan, there are a lot of things that they have been doing that seems to be criminal.They are stupid to believe in a way of life that is suitable for them but at the same time fail to understand that there are differences in the way of lifestyle of other people outside of their circle of people that they are in contact with on a daily basis.Bush Sr. should have never gone over there to Abu Dhabi, he was out of touch with the average Americans here and even more so over there.

  111. dave s
    Posted November 23, 2006 at 5:10 am | Permalink

    ROFLMAO! Maube it would help to know that former President Bush was a PAID speaker at this event which had a $1500 entry fee! And some of those critizing his son were AMERICAN ex-pats.

  112. steve
    Posted November 23, 2006 at 10:19 am | Permalink

    The question historians will be asking is “Was Bush as dumb as he was perceived to be?”

  113. Pam D
    Posted November 23, 2006 at 3:30 pm | Permalink

    just ask yourseves

    “is our children learning”

    the dumbfart is the most ignorant person I have ever heard talk

  114. Richard Heckler
    Posted November 25, 2006 at 6:59 am | Permalink

    Reagan/Bush were arming both Iraq,Iran and bringing on the Taliban. So between George W. Bush, GHW Bush and James Baker III our country now has many Iran Contra figures sitting in important positions within the government. Wonder why we are pre-occupied with the mideast?

    Defense Secretary Nominee Robert Gates Tied to Iran-Contra Scandal and the Secret Arming of Saddam Hussein.

    George Herbert Walker Bush pardoned these Iran Contra Criminals:

    1 Elliott Abrams2 Charles Allen3 Duane ‘Dewey’ R. Clarridge4 Manucher Ghorbanifar5 Robert C. McFarlane6 Edwin Meese III7 John Negroponte8 Oliver North9 John M. Poindexter10 George P. Shultz

    George W. Bush put some some of these back on his payroll. James Baker III brought Ed Meese back for a position on his committee. James Baker asked Robert Gates to be Defense Secretary. Is it any wonder why the Bush admin dislikes transparency? The Iran Contra group are running this government to include James Baker III.

    http://www.prospect.org/web/page.ww?sect...

    http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?tit...

    http://www.hereinreality.com/irancontra….

  115. sunny
    Posted November 25, 2006 at 11:37 am | Permalink

    Don’t confuse these Bush supporters with the facts Heckler – it will only annoy them and then they will have to call you all kinds of unpatriotic names.

    Of course George W. Bush is pre-occupied with the Middle East – if we can keep the war going – just think of all the profits Halliburton is making. That’s the name of the game – unchecked profits going to the elite few.

  116. Rage
    Posted November 25, 2006 at 12:05 pm | Permalink

    What’s remarkable is the Bush pardoned them on Christmas Eve ‘92 for “any crimes they may have committed.”

    He pre-empted the legal system.

    I think he was protecting himself, as well as his corrupt cronies.