Comments on: Foley’s molestation claim appears to be true

By: historybuff

historybuff — Mon, 23 Oct 2006 04:21:27 +0000

So Ben,Is my wall chart wrong or right on the 1900 bc thing? I mean, if you misspoke it is good to admit…..publicly, as in the same forum in which the misinformation was spread……right?Yes, I speak of things beyond ancient Assyria.

By: CapnAmerica

CapnAmerica — Mon, 23 Oct 2006 04:14:12 +0000

Yup . . . that’s how you know you’re scoring, when they troll you, heh heh.

By: J R

J R — Mon, 23 Oct 2006 04:01:10 +0000

I’m so proud. I’ve got my first little snivelling troll.

By: J R

J R — Mon, 23 Oct 2006 03:57:01 +0000

Aww the games afoot!

Nice email addy ya got there “we”. Now who are you REALLY? I mean since you seem to KNOW me and all? Are you Paul hiding out?

My first accusation of being a shill “we”. And it comes from a little person hiding in the dark.And then other shots came in from the dark.

I’m not sincere? First I’ve had that one too.

I’m not a thinking person? Clearly I think differently than you do…..IF you do.

Sanctimonious? With Paul yeah. Hard not to be given his history here. Self righteous? How so? Hateful? Yup. I hate liars and manipulators.

“Is this an example of the tolerance of the left?” No not really. I dislike Paul and I admit it. I should be nice to him anyway? I’m weak. Sorry. Is YOUR post an example of the courage, honesty and integrity of the right?

Come on back “we”. Wear your real nic next time.

By: CapnAmerica

CapnAmerica — Mon, 23 Oct 2006 03:52:47 +0000

Hey, look everybody, it’s the random numbers and letters troll, here with a cheap hit-and-run.

You call it “hitting hard,” I call it “hardly hitting.”

Run away now lxw45389 or whoever you are next time . . .

By: we320009

we320009 — Mon, 23 Oct 2006 03:44:21 +0000

What a shill you must be, too, JR! It’s okay, go ahead and admit it, as no sincere, thinking person could hold the views that you do, be so sanctiminous and self-righteous, and be so hateful, all at the same time. Is this an example of the tolerance of the left?

By: J R

J R — Mon, 23 Oct 2006 03:29:10 +0000

Hey dave,

I know you are new. Let me introduce you better to Paul.

Paul has been busted on so many distortions, half-truths, and outright lies that we have lost count. His FAVORITE support links are from Ann Coulter but he once attempted to win an arguement with a link to a chat room!

By the way? Did you notice Mr. Rosell did not even address the subject of this thread but instead tried a re-direct to attack Raj Goyle? See that is not surprising. The Foley story scares the hell outta Paul. He wouldn’t even touch a Foley thread for more than 2 weeks. He was waiting for orders. Probably he still is.

Most of us believe that Paul is a “proll” or a paid poster. Watch him a bit and you’ll likely decide the same.

So don’t worry too much about Paul. He is mostly the forum idiot. He is the epitome of a depthless neocon shill. If he didn’t post here, we’d probably have to make him up.

Next? Paul will show up (maybe) to whine that I treat him unfairly.

By: Right Angle

Right Angle — Mon, 23 Oct 2006 03:23:52 +0000

“He isn’t a fornicator is he?”

Posted by: Ben Huie | October 22, 2006 at 07:48 PM

No, Ben, I have never heard of him having “criminal” intercourse with the other sex. But I suspect that he is a normal male who just wanted to be prepared in case he got too frendly with a Democrat female. :)

Fornicator \For”ni*ca`tor\, n. [F. fornicateur, OF. fornicator,from L. fornicator.]An unmarried person, male or female, who has criminalintercourse with the other sex; one guilty of fornication.

By: Ben Huie

Ben Huie — Mon, 23 Oct 2006 02:27:14 +0000

dave – you have to understand that in Paul’s little GOP world anyone who works to guaruntee constitutional rights to someone he doesn’t like is evil. He feels the same way about a defense attorney who represents someone he disagrees with.

By: dave s

dave s — Mon, 23 Oct 2006 02:19:48 +0000

Hey Paul, the Rev. Jerry Falwell was also “represented by the ACLU. You obviously have NO IDEA as to what the ACLU does. The ONLY thing they do is take on cases involving the first ten amendments, otherwise known as the “Bill of Rights”.

I happen to be a card carrying member of the ACLU and my question to you is why aren’t you? And just because a lawyer or law organization represents a client in court, in no way means that they agree with client or the client’s views.

http://www.aclu.org/about/index.html

By: Ben Huie

Ben Huie — Mon, 23 Oct 2006 01:48:28 +0000

historybuff – unfortunately it is one of a whole buch of quotes I came across doing an internet search for another quote. Cannot really vet it. I have seen a number of quotes about “today’s kids” going back “forever”

;^)

RA – too bad buddy. Your rightie talking heads have been playing their moral superiority BS for so long you guys deserve whatever you get. By the way, why should Rush Limbaugh have any need for Viagra? He isn’t married. He isn’t a fornicator is he?

By: Mary Caruso

Mary Caruso — Mon, 23 Oct 2006 01:44:17 +0000

Will and RA, My point is that the right, the left, the GOP, the Democrats, both are just two sides to the same coin. Most resonable people fall into the middle somewhere. All the slings and arrows from both sides just distract and take energy away from the real issues. I’m sick of being stereotyped by those of you who can only see left or right and black or white.

By: historybuff

historybuff — Sun, 22 Oct 2006 23:25:53 +0000

Hey Ben, My wallchart of world history has the Assyrian Empire starting at 1900 bc. Can you footnote you 2800bc quote for me?

By: Right Angle

Right Angle — Sun, 22 Oct 2006 22:12:11 +0000

If Foley had been a democrat, the GOP would be foaming at the mouth with absolute glee.

Posted by: Mary Caruso | October 22, 2006 at 09:13 AM

Just like the democrats are now!

By: Will

Will — Sun, 22 Oct 2006 21:24:11 +0000

Marymoon,Of course they would because Democrats are their political rivals. What’s your point?

By: Mary Caruso

Mary Caruso — Sun, 22 Oct 2006 15:13:52 +0000

Good point, JR.If Foley had been a democrat, the GOP would be foaming at the mouth with absolute glee.

By: J R

J R — Sun, 22 Oct 2006 05:40:17 +0000

Well THERE”S rightie! We haven’t seen you in awhile.

The best you got is a talking point? “Look at the Dems?” Weak “right” quite weak.

And look at Foley arch conservative who belonged to many arch conservative organizations along with our own Todd Tiahrt.

Isn’t it one of the basics of “conservatism” to demand personal responsibility even to the point of blaming victims? Well arch conservative Foley aint practicing that is he.

The leadership of the GOP kept his dirty little secret. And then when it was revealed?

Foley did what he did because uh……YEAH because he was GAY…..oh wait….it was because he was DRUNK!…..No that’s not quite it….He did it because he was molested at an early age! Yeah that’s the ticket!

Some party of personal responsibility, huh?

So NOW they get rid of their protected little pedophile AND they get to blame being gay on early childhood trauma AND they get to portray gays as pedophiles! This spin make ya positively dizzy!

By: CapnAmerica

CapnAmerica — Sun, 22 Oct 2006 05:29:33 +0000

Paul–The ACLU-Raj Goyle connection is the only hope that Bonnie Huy’s got.

I can understand why you’re spamming the WEBlog and the LTTE with it.

If only she’d actually done something worth running on in the last six years in the legislature, your shilling would be a lot easier.

Alas, she hasn’t.

But she did embarrass herself when she asked the KU president why Ann Coulter got hit in the face with a pie when she spoke there.

Turned out, Ann Coulter hadn’t been hit with a pie there. Different college, oops.

What a maroon . . .

By: CapnAmerica

CapnAmerica — Sun, 22 Oct 2006 05:23:41 +0000

You gotta point there, WryTangle.

The Democrats haven’t run on the “let’s all hate gays” ticket.

It’s the hypocrisy, not just the offense.

By: Right Angle

Right Angle — Sun, 22 Oct 2006 05:20:23 +0000

I SAY AGAIN:

Former Florida Rep. Mark Foley’s biggest mistake was being a Republican. If he was only a Democrat, he could still be in congress. He would only have to accept a censure, receive a standing ovation from his fellow Democrats and continue to be voted back in at each election. Newspapers across the country would come to his defense. If only he was a Democrat.

By: J R

J R — Sun, 22 Oct 2006 04:57:19 +0000

Hey Prollie Paul!

I’ve missed your softball posts.

Rush Limbaugh was ALSO defended by the ACLU!

By: Paul F. Rosell

Paul F. Rosell — Sun, 22 Oct 2006 04:30:51 +0000

NAMBLA is supported by the ACLU.Fred Phelps is also supported by the ACLU.Raj Goyle is a former employee of the ACLU.Raj Goyle is sending out all kinds of mail pretending to care about children and claiming that he can "stop" Fred Phelps.Political opportunism at its worst!-----Many prominent Democrats have supported NAMBLA:http://www.mediaresearch.org/BozellColumns/newscolumn/2006/col20061012.asp

By: Mary Caruso

Mary Caruso — Sun, 22 Oct 2006 03:04:22 +0000

The one thing I do know is that those who lack internal impulse control often seek external ways to control their behavior. That’s why they’re more drawn to fundamentally strict environments, cultures, and religions.

By: Ben Huie

Ben Huie — Sun, 22 Oct 2006 02:42:09 +0000

Mary – I suspect that whether it is homo or hetero the fact that it is closeted and suppressed leads to pathology.

Disclaimer: I am definitely NOT in any way a professional in this area – this is only supposition.

By: Mary Caruso

Mary Caruso — Sun, 22 Oct 2006 02:37:28 +0000

Being homosexual and in the closet I can understand, but most pedophiles are not gay. It seems strange that a priest would be sexually attracted to a child more than another adult. I think it’s a pathology that needs to be studied more in order to understand it better than we do.