<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Barnett narrowing the gap</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/10/barnett_narrowi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/10/barnett_narrowi/</link>
	<description>The Wichita Eagle Editorial Department Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 22:02:41 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ian Santiago</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/10/barnett_narrowi/#comment-88664</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Santiago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Oct 2006 03:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/10/barnett_narrowihtml/#comment-88664</guid>
		<description>Sebelius is an anti-White, anti-gun, corrupt, pro-wetback traitor. God help me, but I hate that BITCH!!

Viva La Raza Blanco!!

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sebelius is an anti-White, anti-gun, corrupt, pro-wetback traitor. God help me, but I hate that BITCH!!</p>
<p>Viva La Raza Blanco!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CR</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/10/barnett_narrowi/#comment-88663</link>
		<dc:creator>CR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Oct 2006 02:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/10/barnett_narrowihtml/#comment-88663</guid>
		<description>And the construction trade used to have experienced workers who knew what they were doing.  Nowadays we are taking chances with the safety of the buildings and roads that are being built.

Quality does not come cheap.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And the construction trade used to have experienced workers who knew what they were doing.  Nowadays we are taking chances with the safety of the buildings and roads that are being built.</p>
<p>Quality does not come cheap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/10/barnett_narrowi/#comment-88662</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 16:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/10/barnett_narrowihtml/#comment-88662</guid>
		<description>Tracy, no matter how you try to denigrate those jobs, the truth is that Kansas people used to do them and supported their families doing them.  Whether you want your kids doing them or whether you think they are a pleasant vocation is irrelevant.

The construction trade used to be a viable career avenue, and it no longer is for most, because the companies can hire illegals for pennies on the dollar.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tracy, no matter how you try to denigrate those jobs, the truth is that Kansas people used to do them and supported their families doing them.  Whether you want your kids doing them or whether you think they are a pleasant vocation is irrelevant.</p>
<p>The construction trade used to be a viable career avenue, and it no longer is for most, because the companies can hire illegals for pennies on the dollar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TRACY</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/10/barnett_narrowi/#comment-88661</link>
		<dc:creator>TRACY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 16:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/10/barnett_narrowihtml/#comment-88661</guid>
		<description>No, Heck. No problem.I want that too.Still not going to vote for Barndoor.JR, yes Kansans CAN do those jobs.Who do you suggest?Convicts?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, Heck. No problem.I want that too.Still not going to vote for Barndoor.JR, yes Kansans CAN do those jobs.Who do you suggest?Convicts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/10/barnett_narrowi/#comment-88660</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 16:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/10/barnett_narrowihtml/#comment-88660</guid>
		<description>Right on, JR.  It is time to stop making excuses for the corporations to continue to drive wages and benefits down.  The illegals are a convenient avenue for them to use, and it needs to stop.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right on, JR.  It is time to stop making excuses for the corporations to continue to drive wages and benefits down.  The illegals are a convenient avenue for them to use, and it needs to stop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J R</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/10/barnett_narrowi/#comment-88659</link>
		<dc:creator>J R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 16:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/10/barnett_narrowihtml/#comment-88659</guid>
		<description>Tracy

Every one of those jobs you mention can be done by Kansans. Ship the illegals home and those jobs will pay a wage that Kansans will work for.

If Barnett seriously came out against illegal immigrants I might consider voting for him.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tracy</p>
<p>Every one of those jobs you mention can be done by Kansans. Ship the illegals home and those jobs will pay a wage that Kansans will work for.</p>
<p>If Barnett seriously came out against illegal immigrants I might consider voting for him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heckler</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/10/barnett_narrowi/#comment-88658</link>
		<dc:creator>Heckler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 15:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/10/barnett_narrowihtml/#comment-88658</guid>
		<description>Tracy

I don&#039;t think Barnett want&#039;s those people doing those jobs to go home, I think that he just wants them documented. Is there a problem with that?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tracy</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think Barnett want&#8217;s those people doing those jobs to go home, I think that he just wants them documented. Is there a problem with that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TRACY</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/10/barnett_narrowi/#comment-88657</link>
		<dc:creator>TRACY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 15:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/10/barnett_narrowihtml/#comment-88657</guid>
		<description>So if Barndoor wins, there&#039;s gonna&#039; be a whole bunch of job opportunities in Kansas.Yipeee!!!!

Shoveling shit in the huge feedlots, working on the &quot;kill line&quot; at the packing plants, hauling hay, roofing houses in 100 degree weather, cleaning motel rooms, operating picks and shovels on highway constuction, milking hundreds of cows twice a day, cleaning the guts out of chickens, etc.

Wow, we want those jobs.What does shoveling shit and shooting pigs in the head pay nowadays? I wanna be sure to get my kids in line for these superior careers that these illegals are keeping us out of.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So if Barndoor wins, there&#8217;s gonna&#8217; be a whole bunch of job opportunities in Kansas.Yipeee!!!!</p>
<p>Shoveling shit in the huge feedlots, working on the &#8220;kill line&#8221; at the packing plants, hauling hay, roofing houses in 100 degree weather, cleaning motel rooms, operating picks and shovels on highway constuction, milking hundreds of cows twice a day, cleaning the guts out of chickens, etc.</p>
<p>Wow, we want those jobs.What does shoveling shit and shooting pigs in the head pay nowadays? I wanna be sure to get my kids in line for these superior careers that these illegals are keeping us out of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Huie</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/10/barnett_narrowi/#comment-88656</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Huie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 15:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/10/barnett_narrowihtml/#comment-88656</guid>
		<description>fsfg is right.  This election will not be won, it will be lost.  The reasons:  For a Republican to not win he must be awfully bad.  Against such a bad Republican candidate the Democratic alternative would have to blow it to lose.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fsfg is right.  This election will not be won, it will be lost.  The reasons:  For a Republican to not win he must be awfully bad.  Against such a bad Republican candidate the Democratic alternative would have to blow it to lose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ksfarmgrrl</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/10/barnett_narrowi/#comment-88655</link>
		<dc:creator>ksfarmgrrl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 15:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/10/barnett_narrowihtml/#comment-88655</guid>
		<description>hehehehehehehe

Like I said, governor leadership is vulnerable in a number of areas.

Too bad the r&#039;s in kansas did the waltz with the taliban instead of focusing on winning.

Once again. She isnt winning it, YOU REPUBLICANS ARE LOSING IT.

Here is a can of freshly salted wingnuts.

You chose &#039;em. You choke on &#039;em.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hehehehehehehe</p>
<p>Like I said, governor leadership is vulnerable in a number of areas.</p>
<p>Too bad the r&#8217;s in kansas did the waltz with the taliban instead of focusing on winning.</p>
<p>Once again. She isnt winning it, YOU REPUBLICANS ARE LOSING IT.</p>
<p>Here is a can of freshly salted wingnuts.</p>
<p>You chose &#8216;em. You choke on &#8216;em.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ksfarmgrrl</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/10/barnett_narrowi/#comment-88654</link>
		<dc:creator>ksfarmgrrl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 15:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/10/barnett_narrowihtml/#comment-88654</guid>
		<description>Well, the more politically correct amongst us wont agree, but the gay community is not too fond of governor non-leadership either. However, given a choice between less than chatty kathy and susan wagle....

who do YOU think we will support?

Or maybe most of us will just sit this one out. After all, Sebelius broke EVERY promise she ever made to the gay community.

Hee hee hee hee.

That ought to win her even MORE republican votes in ks.

And no endorsement from the Sierra Club?

With her STELLAR record on water policy that has water going to the highest political bidders? To the biggest campaign donors?

Say it isnt so......
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the more politically correct amongst us wont agree, but the gay community is not too fond of governor non-leadership either. However, given a choice between less than chatty kathy and susan wagle&#8230;.</p>
<p>who do YOU think we will support?</p>
<p>Or maybe most of us will just sit this one out. After all, Sebelius broke EVERY promise she ever made to the gay community.</p>
<p>Hee hee hee hee.</p>
<p>That ought to win her even MORE republican votes in ks.</p>
<p>And no endorsement from the Sierra Club?</p>
<p>With her STELLAR record on water policy that has water going to the highest political bidders? To the biggest campaign donors?</p>
<p>Say it isnt so&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Huie</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/10/barnett_narrowi/#comment-88653</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Huie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 15:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/10/barnett_narrowihtml/#comment-88653</guid>
		<description>I think Sebelius&#039; biggest weakness is also in some ways her strength.  In many ways she is &quot;Republican light&quot;.  Thus she can get votes from registered Republicans who do not like the extreme Right that has taken so much of their Party.  On the other hand, she is vulnerable to what happened to Gore in 2000 - not holding on to the votes on the &quot;left&quot;.  Fortunately for her there is no Ralph Nader on the ballot.

Sebelius did NOT receive an endorsement from the KS Sierra Club - as has been noted here she has not shown a lot of leadership in a number of areas.

In a state with about 50% registered Republicans and about 30% Democrats (estimates) she cannot afford to lose any votes.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Sebelius&#8217; biggest weakness is also in some ways her strength.  In many ways she is &#8220;Republican light&#8221;.  Thus she can get votes from registered Republicans who do not like the extreme Right that has taken so much of their Party.  On the other hand, she is vulnerable to what happened to Gore in 2000 &#8211; not holding on to the votes on the &#8220;left&#8221;.  Fortunately for her there is no Ralph Nader on the ballot.</p>
<p>Sebelius did NOT receive an endorsement from the KS Sierra Club &#8211; as has been noted here she has not shown a lot of leadership in a number of areas.</p>
<p>In a state with about 50% registered Republicans and about 30% Democrats (estimates) she cannot afford to lose any votes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/10/barnett_narrowi/#comment-88652</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 14:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/10/barnett_narrowihtml/#comment-88652</guid>
		<description>Remains to be seen.  If they keep hammering on the immigration issue, Barnett could pull even.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remains to be seen.  If they keep hammering on the immigration issue, Barnett could pull even.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ksfarmgrrl</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/10/barnett_narrowi/#comment-88651</link>
		<dc:creator>ksfarmgrrl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 14:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/10/barnett_narrowihtml/#comment-88651</guid>
		<description>If the republicans could have fielded a credible candidate, i.e. one with out the wingnut taint, complete with flip flops to pander to the kansas taliban,

and if the republicans had put someone on the ticket as lite gov who wasnt as corrupt, hypocritical, and far right wingnut as susan &quot;I own bingo parlors but you cant vote on casinos&quot; wagle,

and if the legislature had shown real leadership and accomplished a few things,

I think kathleen would be toast.

She didnt win this one. You lost it.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the republicans could have fielded a credible candidate, i.e. one with out the wingnut taint, complete with flip flops to pander to the kansas taliban,</p>
<p>and if the republicans had put someone on the ticket as lite gov who wasnt as corrupt, hypocritical, and far right wingnut as susan &#8220;I own bingo parlors but you cant vote on casinos&#8221; wagle,</p>
<p>and if the legislature had shown real leadership and accomplished a few things,</p>
<p>I think kathleen would be toast.</p>
<p>She didnt win this one. You lost it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CapnAmerica</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/10/barnett_narrowi/#comment-88650</link>
		<dc:creator>CapnAmerica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 23:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/10/barnett_narrowihtml/#comment-88650</guid>
		<description>Let the record show that name-changing troll &quot;Hmm&quot; refuses to take a bet on his candidate.

All mouth and no money, all blow and no show, all talk and no walk.

Yup, typical right-winger.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let the record show that name-changing troll &#8220;Hmm&#8221; refuses to take a bet on his candidate.</p>
<p>All mouth and no money, all blow and no show, all talk and no walk.</p>
<p>Yup, typical right-winger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Huie</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/10/barnett_narrowi/#comment-88649</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Huie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 23:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/10/barnett_narrowihtml/#comment-88649</guid>
		<description>hmm ...

A similar observation I have made locally with municipal elections is that if an incumbent is sub-50 in the primary he/she loses in the final.  The reason:  the &#039;not&#039; vote coalesces around one opponent.  Note Elma Broadfoot&#039;s defeat after she handily outdistanced everyone in the primary.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmm &#8230;</p>
<p>A similar observation I have made locally with municipal elections is that if an incumbent is sub-50 in the primary he/she loses in the final.  The reason:  the &#8216;not&#8217; vote coalesces around one opponent.  Note Elma Broadfoot&#8217;s defeat after she handily outdistanced everyone in the primary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hmm</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/10/barnett_narrowi/#comment-88648</link>
		<dc:creator>hmm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 22:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/10/barnett_narrowihtml/#comment-88648</guid>
		<description>CapnAmerica:

Not sure where you are going with the name thing, I have posted twice today using the same name.

Why are you afraid of a simple observation? Did it hurt? Are you going to lose sleep? If I were you I would give the $50 to Kathleen unless you think that it&#039;s a lost cause. Maybe that $50 will move the polls to finally break 50%. Don&#039;t give up now if you believe in something, after all you are CapnAmerica!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CapnAmerica:</p>
<p>Not sure where you are going with the name thing, I have posted twice today using the same name.</p>
<p>Why are you afraid of a simple observation? Did it hurt? Are you going to lose sleep? If I were you I would give the $50 to Kathleen unless you think that it&#8217;s a lost cause. Maybe that $50 will move the polls to finally break 50%. Don&#8217;t give up now if you believe in something, after all you are CapnAmerica!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CapnAmerica</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/10/barnett_narrowi/#comment-88647</link>
		<dc:creator>CapnAmerica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 22:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/10/barnett_narrowihtml/#comment-88647</guid>
		<description>Hmmm--

People who are such cowards that they don&#039;t use the same name twice don&#039;t really have much credibility either.

I&#039;ll bet you 50 dollars that Sebelius wins in November.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8211;</p>
<p>People who are such cowards that they don&#8217;t use the same name twice don&#8217;t really have much credibility either.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll bet you 50 dollars that Sebelius wins in November.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hmm</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/10/barnett_narrowi/#comment-88646</link>
		<dc:creator>hmm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 22:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/10/barnett_narrowihtml/#comment-88646</guid>
		<description>If I spent about $1,000,000 on TV ads and have not moved anywhere in the polls, I would be worried. It can only be two things: 1)immigration, 2) a credibility gap.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I spent about $1,000,000 on TV ads and have not moved anywhere in the polls, I would be worried. It can only be two things: 1)immigration, 2) a credibility gap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wiseman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/10/barnett_narrowi/#comment-88645</link>
		<dc:creator>Wiseman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 20:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/10/barnett_narrowihtml/#comment-88645</guid>
		<description>I agreed with you - jw.I will most likely vote for Barnett, Sebelius has had her chance at fixing the problems of illegal immigration; she could be doing more on a state level.Since the Vietnam War, I have understood how immigrates carry their political beliefs and lifestyle into another country even after decades in a different civilization.The failure of a country is a measurement by what its people allow not by its government system, which is the reason we have a constitution and a bill of rights.By the people, for the people, we the people it is the words that the founding fathers used.Don&#039;t get me wrong but there is difference between illegal and legal immigration, also a different state of union of our nation between today and two hundred years ago.What are most not agreeable with people are the criminal elements behind all this, the negligence of the government system to intergrade of our forms of governments from both side of the border is at fault, causing an unraveling of a union of nations.The ones that are most hurt by all this is the common people.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agreed with you &#8211; jw.I will most likely vote for Barnett, Sebelius has had her chance at fixing the problems of illegal immigration; she could be doing more on a state level.Since the Vietnam War, I have understood how immigrates carry their political beliefs and lifestyle into another country even after decades in a different civilization.The failure of a country is a measurement by what its people allow not by its government system, which is the reason we have a constitution and a bill of rights.By the people, for the people, we the people it is the words that the founding fathers used.Don&#8217;t get me wrong but there is difference between illegal and legal immigration, also a different state of union of our nation between today and two hundred years ago.What are most not agreeable with people are the criminal elements behind all this, the negligence of the government system to intergrade of our forms of governments from both side of the border is at fault, causing an unraveling of a union of nations.The ones that are most hurt by all this is the common people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Davis</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/10/barnett_narrowi/#comment-88644</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 18:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/10/barnett_narrowihtml/#comment-88644</guid>
		<description>Could be, Ben.

Did you see Hank Price is wanting to bet that the Repubs will keep majorities in both the U.S. Senate and House AND a Repub will be elected in Foley&#039;s district?  This is on yesterday&#039;s Foley thread.  I only hope he has his wife&#039;s permission to blow her money like that.  I am pretty sure my wife wouldn&#039;t indulge quite that much.

I encouraged Mr Price to make it the &quot;wing-nut quadfecta&quot; by adding the condition that Katherine Harris will win the Florida Senate seat, too.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could be, Ben.</p>
<p>Did you see Hank Price is wanting to bet that the Repubs will keep majorities in both the U.S. Senate and House AND a Repub will be elected in Foley&#8217;s district?  This is on yesterday&#8217;s Foley thread.  I only hope he has his wife&#8217;s permission to blow her money like that.  I am pretty sure my wife wouldn&#8217;t indulge quite that much.</p>
<p>I encouraged Mr Price to make it the &#8220;wing-nut quadfecta&#8221; by adding the condition that Katherine Harris will win the Florida Senate seat, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Huie</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/10/barnett_narrowi/#comment-88643</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Huie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 17:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/10/barnett_narrowihtml/#comment-88643</guid>
		<description>Steven - interesting question.  Would that explain Michael Reagan and Neal Boortz as well?

I have to say that as a former resident of Hastert&#039;s district and supporter in his freshman campaign to replace Grotberg I am disappointed.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steven &#8211; interesting question.  Would that explain Michael Reagan and Neal Boortz as well?</p>
<p>I have to say that as a former resident of Hastert&#8217;s district and supporter in his freshman campaign to replace Grotberg I am disappointed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Davis</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/10/barnett_narrowi/#comment-88642</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 17:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/10/barnett_narrowihtml/#comment-88642</guid>
		<description>Ben,You have to wonder how Hastert resgining benefits the Moon family in this case?  Maybe they hope to install a far-right idealogue, perhaps?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben,You have to wonder how Hastert resgining benefits the Moon family in this case?  Maybe they hope to install a far-right idealogue, perhaps?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Huie</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/10/barnett_narrowi/#comment-88641</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Huie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 17:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/10/barnett_narrowihtml/#comment-88641</guid>
		<description>Steven - at least the Wash Times might be waking up.  They called for Hastert&#039;s resignation.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steven &#8211; at least the Wash Times might be waking up.  They called for Hastert&#8217;s resignation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Davis</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/10/barnett_narrowi/#comment-88640</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 17:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/10/barnett_narrowihtml/#comment-88640</guid>
		<description>In defense of Joe Williams:  at least he doesn&#039;t post bigoted statements like those one regularly finds in the Washington Times (Reagan&#039;s favorite DC paper).
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In defense of Joe Williams:  at least he doesn&#8217;t post bigoted statements like those one regularly finds in the Washington Times (Reagan&#8217;s favorite DC paper).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
