Bad news for the liberals that screwed him.

http://www.forbes.com/technology/ebusiness/feeds/ap/2006/08/17/ap2957271.html

“Saddam Hussein has continuing ties to terrorist organization.”

“The danger to our country is grave, the danger to our country is growing.”

“The Iraqi regime possesses chemical and biological weapons.”

“The Iraqi regime could launch a biolgical or chemical attack in as little as 45 minutes.”

“We can’t wait for the final proof the smoking gun that could come in the form of a mushroom cloud.”

“I . . . I . . . I . . . think we’re going to find the truth and the truth will tell us he was developing weapons of mass destruction.”

“To those people who said we haven’t found the weapons of mass destruction, they were wrong. We found them. We found them.”

Soon, the adults will be back in office, the ones that don’t lie us into endless war . . . .

Everybody including you knows it going to be a rout for the Dems this November.

You don’t have to say you were wrong.

That’s apparently impossible for conservatives to say. Just look at Bush. He still won’t say he was wrong about WMD’s in Iraq.

More of Paul’s Coulterism’s — voter turnout was huge, about 50%, exceeding the 1970 record of 38.8%.

Paul: “.. [Lamont] feels the common inferiority of second and third and forth generation wealth.”

Your bogus amateur diagnosis, and constant use of lies to support your false opinions, suggests that YOU have problems.

I just remembered who you are! I apologize!

Hope you are doing well, look us up if you get back in town!

I did say in my open bet post, first come first serve and Ben jumped on it like white on rice.

Next time I pull my head out of my ass to make a stupid bet like that I’ll give you first chance!

Hank

PS I never forget a dog, if you had a dog, I’d remember its name.

For the record: Hank and I have met, several of the regulars know who I am, and Steven Davis has my address.

You, are however, correct that it would not have been worth a 900-mile trip to “collect” (that works both ways, ya know).

We now return you to your regularly scheduled program.

Don’t do it, if your right, they’ll all commit suicide and you won’t be able to collect on the bet

“I wonder if you want to offer the same bet that you took several months ago with another poster–that in November the Democrats will not gain any seats in either the house or the senate.”

I only dropped $20 bucks. I didn’t bet Rage, I’m not sure who the hell he is. (like you) Hard for me to send Guido out to collect my bets when I don’t know where to send him.

By the way, who the hell are you? Are you who I think you are?

Hank

No you didn’t. Otherwise you wouldn’t have dropped 40 bucks on the guy.

But keep re-writing history. That’s what you Republicans do best, isn’t it.

“We have always been at war with East Asia. We have never been at war with Eurasia.”

The Republicans win on taking a strong (wrong) stand on the issues.

When the Dems lose, they tell us it’s because we’re too opinionated . . . we need to tone down our message.

It’s like telling a miler he’s losing races because he’s running too fast; he needs to slow his pace down . . .

It was a good bet on his part. A sitting Senator has only been defeated in their own primary four times (that’s what I heard anyway).

Looks like the Democratic wing of the Democratic party (you know, the wack-os) had more clout than you gave them credit for.

I wonder if you want to offer the same bet that you took several months ago with another poster–that in November the Democrats will not gain any seats in either the house or the senate.

Hank?

The above is what the Dems have been trying the last few election cycles.

I haven’t been impressed with the results of the “Political Maturity” approach. It’s past time to try something different.

I heard an analysis on NPR, that voters are wanting to hear clear messages on what candidates think about issues — and are not impressed with the “let’s try and sneak into office without anyone noticing approach” (what Paul suggests in the above). Please Paul, convince your Republican brethren of the value of your methods.

I knew poor ol’ Joe was in trouble when Billy boy Clinton campaigned for him.

Now if Joe can get Clinton to endorse Lamont he’ll have a chance!

Joe is going to play the dirty-campaign-they-are-anti-semantic-I’m-a-victim card and the idiots in CT will elect him.

Hank

More to the point, Reid and Schumer have lots to gain by turning their backs on the Garden Gnome: namely, the love and money of Democrats like me. Lose the Gnome, and CF opens his wallet and shuts his mouth.

Game. Set. Match.

Oh, and Paul F. Rosell, hit the button ONCE, dude. We know you really want to see your important-sounding spin in print, but Sir, please control yourself!

Yes, PLEASE DO google Bob Beckel.

heheh. You will find that his claim to fame is that he managed Walter Mondale’s campaign for president in 1984. I guess that would explain why paul admires his political genius even if he is a democrat.

It would also explain why bob beckel is stupid enough to say the lieberman race is all about the HOUSE!!!

hehehe. Yes indeedy doo. I see why Paul thinks he is a top political person of substance. hee hee hee

You will also find info on google about Bob Beckels arrests on morals charges and his CONTRACT WITH FOX NEWS.

hee hee hee hee

Paul, you are the best friend our side has.

Especially with the CT Republican running third with less than 20% of the vote.

CT will remain solidly BLUE. Lieberman might squeek through in November but the GOP will come in dead last – with the emphasis on DEAD!

hee hee heee heeeee

Oh hell, if I had just known that earlier….

hoo hoo haa haa hee heee

Comments like that must be what make paul such a brilliant political analyst.

hehehe. That and POLITICAL MATURITY

I guess your preznit and paul are good examples of that?

hee hee hee hee hee hee hee hee

Paul is on the front line of the fighting republican meme warriors when he says this:

“What you want to BELIEVE is that all people either AGREE with YOU and are your friends, or that they DISAGREE with YOU and are your ENEMIES, on ONE issue primarily, the WAR”

hee hee hee hee hee hee hee hee hoooo…..

Uh paul dear, it was the bushies and the preznit who said “you are either for us or against us” you are either “with us or with the terrorists”.

hee hee hee hee hee

but DO try to continue to pin that on the democrats.

The dems elect someone they want, and the R’s want to tell them why that is wrong?

hehehehehehehehehehheeheheheh

Oh yea, we know you have OUR best interests at heart. The more you whine, the more the dems know, electing lamont was the right decision.

NOVEMBER IS GONNA BE SO.MUCH.FUN!!!