Such as, Lamont did not have direct control of the Wal-Mart stock, and was not controlling the investment.

I’m sure Paul F. Rosell will thoroughly explain the VP’s earlier actions as Secretary of Defense — plus being CEO, receiving deferred pay, and stock options.

Here’s an appetizer — Paul F. Rosell will provide the main course.http://rawstory.com/news/2005/Cheneys_stock_options_rose_3281_last_1011.html

“Often, business owners who are slightly over $2,000,000 in net worth simply buy a life insurance policy to pay any estate taxes. We usually have to set up an insurance trust, since, otherwise, any insurance benefit would be added to the taxable estate.”

If you advise people to take out insurance policies to help pay the estate tax when their total net worth is slightly over 2M then you should be fired for incompetence. Because if you knew what the hell you were talking about you would know that they would only pay taxes on the amount over 2M.

But more than likely you are (once again) just full of shit.

Lamont/WalMart stock = bad/hypocritical

Cheney/Hallibuton stock = good/no conflict of interest

Is that about the size of it?

Perhaps I’m missing something?

I’m sure Lamont will be thoroughly “Swift-boated” between now and election day.

I’m glad you “know” everything about Lamont – just like you “know” that Saddam flew the planes; that he had a mammoth WMD program; that our troops would be welcomed with flowers; that Ahmed Chalabi would take over with ease; …

I’m sure Rush, O’Reilly, Hannity, etc will tell you what to think tomorrow …

We already handed you your rear 2 weeks ago on points re John F. Kennedy (91% tax rate) — and misinterpreting the Laffer curve.

Your repetition of bogus points that were destroyed earlier is tiresome. Take notes if you lack a memory.

Again, you prove that today’s Repugs needs misinformation, Rush, Coulter, Faux, etc., and a DYSFUNCTIONAL media to survive.

Paul, Kennedy lowered the marginal tax rate to 70%, but Clinton raised (sic) it to 39.6%?

Rush, Laffer, Hannity, and Kennedy.http://www.dailyhowler.com/dh010603.shtml

I wonder if they develop a tolerance for hypocrisy the way a drunk develops tolerance for alcohol?

They build up to it over time until they can stand massive amounts without their heads exploding.

Thank’s for proving how Repugs spread false info — your link, the bogus ‘Pink Diaper Baby’, is spreading across the “red state” blogs.

R’s can’t win on the issues, so they resort to falsely smearing the candidates.

http://nedlamont.com/news/670/lieberman-rival-hopes-to-find-support-in-issues-beyond-iraq“A scion of bankers at J. P. Morgan & Co., Mr. Lamont said that he grew up with a trust fund — he would not disclose its size — but that his inheritance accounted for less than 10 percent of his current wealth.”

His father, Ted (Edward M. Sr.), was an economist who worked with the Marshall Plan which helped reconstruct Europe after World War II.[11] He later served in the Nixon administration in Housing and Urban Development. Ted Lamont is now an unaffiliated voter, having last voted for a Republican in 1988. Since then he has voted Democratic. He told The Hartford Courant that “Eastern Moderates no longer have a place in the GOP.”[12]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ned_Lamont

He is NOT the grandson of Corless Lamont as claimed by your Lamoont-hater. He is grandnephew to him. He actually descends from the JP Morgan business.