<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will social conservatives take the bait again?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/06/will_social_con/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/06/will_social_con/</link>
	<description>The Wichita Eagle Editorial Department Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 01:44:04 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: J M Walker</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/06/will_social_con/#comment-54506</link>
		<dc:creator>J M Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2006 00:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/06/will_social_conhtml/#comment-54506</guid>
		<description>DD,Had to work today, so late posting:

I don&#039;t think Bush was trying to do away with SS. He was trying to change the way it was looked at and run. There was a chance it would be weakened to the point of uselessness, but I doubt there ever was any doubt as to Bush&#039;s plan failing.

As for the rich/class warfare, it is still a club that can carry real weight if it is used properly. The Republicans, as well as many Democrats, have sold themselves out to business at the expense of the average person. Business has so many loopholes, it would take more than all the dikes in the world to plug them.

If the Democrats can come up with soneone with the charisma to carry a &quot;I will plug them&quot; message, aand get the full backing of the Democrat party, it would be a votable issue. With the stench of the Abramof affair still strong, political reform would be another votable issue, but the Democrats are going to have to learn to use those things to their advantage; and they are not doing so now. They are still in the name-calling stage of childish nonsense.

The Republicans are experts at taking an issue and making the Democrats look bad. The Democrats are going to have to learn how to street fight and get their noses bloodied a time or two to understand what they are going to have to do to win in 2006 and 2008.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DD,Had to work today, so late posting:</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think Bush was trying to do away with SS. He was trying to change the way it was looked at and run. There was a chance it would be weakened to the point of uselessness, but I doubt there ever was any doubt as to Bush&#8217;s plan failing.</p>
<p>As for the rich/class warfare, it is still a club that can carry real weight if it is used properly. The Republicans, as well as many Democrats, have sold themselves out to business at the expense of the average person. Business has so many loopholes, it would take more than all the dikes in the world to plug them.</p>
<p>If the Democrats can come up with soneone with the charisma to carry a &#8220;I will plug them&#8221; message, aand get the full backing of the Democrat party, it would be a votable issue. With the stench of the Abramof affair still strong, political reform would be another votable issue, but the Democrats are going to have to learn to use those things to their advantage; and they are not doing so now. They are still in the name-calling stage of childish nonsense.</p>
<p>The Republicans are experts at taking an issue and making the Democrats look bad. The Democrats are going to have to learn how to street fight and get their noses bloodied a time or two to understand what they are going to have to do to win in 2006 and 2008.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/06/will_social_con/#comment-54504</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 18:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/06/will_social_conhtml/#comment-54504</guid>
		<description>Apophis,I have heard that as a reason to be against it before, while I disagree with it, it is a valid belief.DD, since emotion is impossible to convey through type, I just want you to know my tone and frame of the question was simply surprise. I am aware of the concerns and the legitmate lack of trust in government to do the right thing. This really is the first time I had ever heard it was supposed to be a way to do away with SS. Personally, I think it could have been an excellent opportunity for today&#039;s young people to take control and improve their prospects for the later parts of their lives. Then again, depending on the deals cut, palms greased and lies told, it could have been a bad deal, but we will never know now, and the best our young can ever hope for is a whittled down version of the currently dying system we have today.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apophis,I have heard that as a reason to be against it before, while I disagree with it, it is a valid belief.DD, since emotion is impossible to convey through type, I just want you to know my tone and frame of the question was simply surprise. I am aware of the concerns and the legitmate lack of trust in government to do the right thing. This really is the first time I had ever heard it was supposed to be a way to do away with SS. Personally, I think it could have been an excellent opportunity for today&#8217;s young people to take control and improve their prospects for the later parts of their lives. Then again, depending on the deals cut, palms greased and lies told, it could have been a bad deal, but we will never know now, and the best our young can ever hope for is a whittled down version of the currently dying system we have today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darwin'sDisciple</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/06/will_social_con/#comment-54502</link>
		<dc:creator>Darwin'sDisciple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 17:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/06/will_social_conhtml/#comment-54502</guid>
		<description>Nick,The tone and frame of your question, implies to me that I could only refer you to resources that you wouldn&#039;t believe.  So, thanks, but I&#039;ll pass.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick,The tone and frame of your question, implies to me that I could only refer you to resources that you wouldn&#8217;t believe.  So, thanks, but I&#8217;ll pass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apophis</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/06/will_social_con/#comment-54500</link>
		<dc:creator>Apophis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 17:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/06/will_social_conhtml/#comment-54500</guid>
		<description>SS is too valuable to risk private investment, period.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SS is too valuable to risk private investment, period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/06/will_social_con/#comment-54497</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 16:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/06/will_social_conhtml/#comment-54497</guid>
		<description>DD,How on earth do you equate Bush&#039;s plan to invest a portion of SSN funds into market accounts to a plan to do away with social security?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DD,How on earth do you equate Bush&#8217;s plan to invest a portion of SSN funds into market accounts to a plan to do away with social security?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darwin'sDisciple</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/06/will_social_con/#comment-54495</link>
		<dc:creator>Darwin'sDisciple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 15:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/06/will_social_conhtml/#comment-54495</guid>
		<description>Walker:The Republicans are going to come back with &quot;Do you want higher taxes to pay for the slob on the street who won&#039;t get a job?&quot;.

Sorry about being so long in getting back to this.  I think the Repub&#039;s counter of &quot;class warfare&quot; has worked pretty well.  Even though Warren Buffet says &quot;Yes, it is a war and my class is winning&quot;, attacking the rich does not seem to generate much traction.

The only thing along these lines that might be an effective point was Bush&#039;s push to basically do away with Social Security.  A popular FDR era program that has worked and could be made secure with little changes.

I recall a staunch Republican older woman who was at Bush&#039;s KSU speech being interviewed after the speech on Wichita&#039;s local TV.  When asked about Social Security, she said something to the effect of &quot;Well, that is where me and him [Bush] part company.&quot;

So, I think highlighting those areas where strident ideology has been at work in hurting the middle class is needed.  The diffuse attacks on &quot;the rich&quot; is not going to hold water, however.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Walker:The Republicans are going to come back with &#8220;Do you want higher taxes to pay for the slob on the street who won&#8217;t get a job?&#8221;.</p>
<p>Sorry about being so long in getting back to this.  I think the Repub&#8217;s counter of &#8220;class warfare&#8221; has worked pretty well.  Even though Warren Buffet says &#8220;Yes, it is a war and my class is winning&#8221;, attacking the rich does not seem to generate much traction.</p>
<p>The only thing along these lines that might be an effective point was Bush&#8217;s push to basically do away with Social Security.  A popular FDR era program that has worked and could be made secure with little changes.</p>
<p>I recall a staunch Republican older woman who was at Bush&#8217;s KSU speech being interviewed after the speech on Wichita&#8217;s local TV.  When asked about Social Security, she said something to the effect of &#8220;Well, that is where me and him [Bush] part company.&#8221;</p>
<p>So, I think highlighting those areas where strident ideology has been at work in hurting the middle class is needed.  The diffuse attacks on &#8220;the rich&#8221; is not going to hold water, however.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/06/will_social_con/#comment-54493</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 06:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/06/will_social_conhtml/#comment-54493</guid>
		<description>&quot;But you know I could be wrong.&quot;

Well Gary,If I have learned anything over the years, the one thing for certain, is that politicians, almost without exception, have an uncanny knack for proving their supporters wrong. I am convinced that they have some sort of secret ceremony where they are required to prove their loyalty by committing an act of betrayal toward those that elected them. ;-)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;But you know I could be wrong.&#8221;</p>
<p>Well Gary,If I have learned anything over the years, the one thing for certain, is that politicians, almost without exception, have an uncanny knack for proving their supporters wrong. I am convinced that they have some sort of secret ceremony where they are required to prove their loyalty by committing an act of betrayal toward those that elected them. ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary C.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/06/will_social_con/#comment-54491</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 04:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/06/will_social_conhtml/#comment-54491</guid>
		<description>Nick,

I really do believe that Mr. Gore would have taken the threats alot more seriously than Fuck-up did. Considering he was involved in predicting that future terrorist attacks might involve airliners.

I really dont think he would have forgotten the study.

But you know I could be wrong.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick,</p>
<p>I really do believe that Mr. Gore would have taken the threats alot more seriously than Fuck-up did. Considering he was involved in predicting that future terrorist attacks might involve airliners.</p>
<p>I really dont think he would have forgotten the study.</p>
<p>But you know I could be wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/06/will_social_con/#comment-54489</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jun 2006 21:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/06/will_social_conhtml/#comment-54489</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll testify JM. I remember reading your&#039;s and someone elses comments saying nothing would come of it. Personally I found it kind of disturbing that only a couple of people could see what I considered obvious.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll testify JM. I remember reading your&#8217;s and someone elses comments saying nothing would come of it. Personally I found it kind of disturbing that only a couple of people could see what I considered obvious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J M Walker</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/06/will_social_con/#comment-54487</link>
		<dc:creator>J M Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jun 2006 20:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/06/will_social_conhtml/#comment-54487</guid>
		<description>I remember when the Abramof affair first plied the web. I said then there would be no reform, and sadly, I am correct. Vote these morons out and get people who will reform this bloated monster as it should be.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember when the Abramof affair first plied the web. I said then there would be no reform, and sadly, I am correct. Vote these morons out and get people who will reform this bloated monster as it should be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/06/will_social_con/#comment-54485</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jun 2006 20:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/06/will_social_conhtml/#comment-54485</guid>
		<description>You know XXX, awhile back I read the most interesting article, written by a former representative that illustrated in detail just exactly how and when they turned well intentioned freshman reps against the people they represent and into &quot;one of them.&quot; It even contained a large part of their orientation speech, and went on to tell of the price he paid for bucking them. It was great, but of course got little attention. I wish I would have saved that article or knew the name of the person that wrote it.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know XXX, awhile back I read the most interesting article, written by a former representative that illustrated in detail just exactly how and when they turned well intentioned freshman reps against the people they represent and into &#8220;one of them.&#8221; It even contained a large part of their orientation speech, and went on to tell of the price he paid for bucking them. It was great, but of course got little attention. I wish I would have saved that article or knew the name of the person that wrote it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/06/will_social_con/#comment-54483</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jun 2006 20:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/06/will_social_conhtml/#comment-54483</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s hard to say what he would have ignored Gary. Is it safe to assume that his boss refused to sign off on the measure his committee proposed? How does a measure supporting the use of government funds to install advanced bomb dection in airports reflect on Gore&#039;s ability to predict and prevent terrorist activity? As I recall there was a great deal of ignoring threats, and actual acts going on during this time in Washington. Most of which were addressed by Hillary when she was telling us what a beautiful religion, &quot;the religion of peace&quot; really was. Once again however, it is impossible to say what Gore would have done.The key to a situation like this would indeed have been increased security and screening of passengers, something of which the government had long before fulfilled their obligation by providing a tax for this very purpose. The problem was, the tax was being collected and used to line the pockets of the airline industry instead of it&#039;s intended purpose.Considering that there had been at least 3 attempts in the previous year at crashing planes into buildings, maybe Mr Gore&#039;s committee should have concentrated on that? One way or another, it is impossible to place blame on a single administration for not acting to prevent an event that has not occured. What do you think the chances are of anyone getting anything passed the ACLU, The House or Senate without a previous incident to document the need?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s hard to say what he would have ignored Gary. Is it safe to assume that his boss refused to sign off on the measure his committee proposed? How does a measure supporting the use of government funds to install advanced bomb dection in airports reflect on Gore&#8217;s ability to predict and prevent terrorist activity? As I recall there was a great deal of ignoring threats, and actual acts going on during this time in Washington. Most of which were addressed by Hillary when she was telling us what a beautiful religion, &#8220;the religion of peace&#8221; really was. Once again however, it is impossible to say what Gore would have done.The key to a situation like this would indeed have been increased security and screening of passengers, something of which the government had long before fulfilled their obligation by providing a tax for this very purpose. The problem was, the tax was being collected and used to line the pockets of the airline industry instead of it&#8217;s intended purpose.Considering that there had been at least 3 attempts in the previous year at crashing planes into buildings, maybe Mr Gore&#8217;s committee should have concentrated on that? One way or another, it is impossible to place blame on a single administration for not acting to prevent an event that has not occured. What do you think the chances are of anyone getting anything passed the ACLU, The House or Senate without a previous incident to document the need?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: XXX</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/06/will_social_con/#comment-54481</link>
		<dc:creator>XXX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jun 2006 19:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/06/will_social_conhtml/#comment-54481</guid>
		<description>Nick, the sad thing is, no matter which side, no matter how clean the politician is. once they get to Washington, it seems like they almost all go bad. Just demonstrates that everybody has a price. And the lobbiests have the money to meet that price. There for a little while, it looked like we might get lobbying reform, but look what really happened.

We need to get rid of almost all of them, we need to take back our country. I for one, am tired of politicians being in the pocket of special interests.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick, the sad thing is, no matter which side, no matter how clean the politician is. once they get to Washington, it seems like they almost all go bad. Just demonstrates that everybody has a price. And the lobbiests have the money to meet that price. There for a little while, it looked like we might get lobbying reform, but look what really happened.</p>
<p>We need to get rid of almost all of them, we need to take back our country. I for one, am tired of politicians being in the pocket of special interests.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GaryC.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/06/will_social_con/#comment-54479</link>
		<dc:creator>GaryC.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jun 2006 19:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/06/will_social_conhtml/#comment-54479</guid>
		<description>Sorry, but I didnt know If your an American citizen living overseas that your vote usually doesnt count.

Doesnt sound fair to all the servicemen fighting in Iraq, and all the others who are commited to their duty elsewhere across the world.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, but I didnt know If your an American citizen living overseas that your vote usually doesnt count.</p>
<p>Doesnt sound fair to all the servicemen fighting in Iraq, and all the others who are commited to their duty elsewhere across the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/06/will_social_con/#comment-54477</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jun 2006 19:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/06/will_social_conhtml/#comment-54477</guid>
		<description>Gary C,&quot;What? Let me get this straight. If your an American citizen living overseas, your absentee ballot only gets counted if necessary?&quot;

Yes, and as a matter of fact that is word for word exactly what I said.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gary C,&#8221;What? Let me get this straight. If your an American citizen living overseas, your absentee ballot only gets counted if necessary?&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes, and as a matter of fact that is word for word exactly what I said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jed</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/06/will_social_con/#comment-54476</link>
		<dc:creator>Jed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jun 2006 19:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/06/will_social_conhtml/#comment-54476</guid>
		<description>Apparently, conservatism can&#039;t work without enemies. With the collapse of communism, they needed somebody to fight, and picked gay people, since they figured they&#039;d have no defenders and be a safe target.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently, conservatism can&#8217;t work without enemies. With the collapse of communism, they needed somebody to fight, and picked gay people, since they figured they&#8217;d have no defenders and be a safe target.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GaryC.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/06/will_social_con/#comment-54474</link>
		<dc:creator>GaryC.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jun 2006 18:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/06/will_social_conhtml/#comment-54474</guid>
		<description>Do you think Al Gore would have ignored the memo that stated Al Quada was determined to attak using Airplanes as missiles? Take a look at the link below and tell me what you think.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/US/9609/05/airport.security/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.cnn.com/US/9609/05/airport.security/&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you think Al Gore would have ignored the memo that stated Al Quada was determined to attak using Airplanes as missiles? Take a look at the link below and tell me what you think.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cnn.com/US/9609/05/airport.security/" rel="nofollow">http://www.cnn.com/US/9609/05/airport.security/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GaryC.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/06/will_social_con/#comment-54472</link>
		<dc:creator>GaryC.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jun 2006 18:47:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/06/will_social_conhtml/#comment-54472</guid>
		<description>&quot;it would have triggered the counting of overseas absentee ballots that do not get counted unless necessary&quot;

What? Let me get this straight. If your an American citizen living overseas, your absentee ballot only gets counted if necessary?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;it would have triggered the counting of overseas absentee ballots that do not get counted unless necessary&#8221;</p>
<p>What? Let me get this straight. If your an American citizen living overseas, your absentee ballot only gets counted if necessary?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/06/will_social_con/#comment-54470</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jun 2006 18:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/06/will_social_conhtml/#comment-54470</guid>
		<description>Glad to see we agree XXX. I don&#039;t really see getting either side to enforce them as long as Corporate and Special interests are allowed unlimited access via legalized bribery.First and formost what is needed is a serious and relentless anti incumbancy effort on the part of the American people in general. Then, an even more vigorous effort geared toward ending special interest and corporate donations combined with strict term limits.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to see we agree XXX. I don&#8217;t really see getting either side to enforce them as long as Corporate and Special interests are allowed unlimited access via legalized bribery.First and formost what is needed is a serious and relentless anti incumbancy effort on the part of the American people in general. Then, an even more vigorous effort geared toward ending special interest and corporate donations combined with strict term limits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/06/will_social_con/#comment-54468</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jun 2006 18:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/06/will_social_conhtml/#comment-54468</guid>
		<description>Well brown, I think you forgot about Mr Gore&#039;s own attempts to manipulate the election process through the courts that prompted the appeal to the supreme court, however, that is all water under the bridge.Had he been successful in his own manipulation and kept it within the states court system, and won, it would have triggered the counting of overseas absentee ballots that do not get counted unless necessary. If you will recall, the Gore people had already prepared to sue to prevent the overseas ballots from being counted. He had good reason to decide against this however, as the overseas ballots included an overwhelming amount of active duty military votes. The likely outcome of counting the overseas ballots would have been that Gore didn&#039;t win the popular vote after all. His handlers wisely talked him out of it.As for whether or not he would have been better than Bush. I doubt it. They are both slaves to the corportaions and special interests they serve. He certainly never did or said anything during his vice presidency that impressed me, but I admit that would have been difficult when you are dealing with a co-presidency, half of which caused the democrats as many problems as the elected half.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well brown, I think you forgot about Mr Gore&#8217;s own attempts to manipulate the election process through the courts that prompted the appeal to the supreme court, however, that is all water under the bridge.Had he been successful in his own manipulation and kept it within the states court system, and won, it would have triggered the counting of overseas absentee ballots that do not get counted unless necessary. If you will recall, the Gore people had already prepared to sue to prevent the overseas ballots from being counted. He had good reason to decide against this however, as the overseas ballots included an overwhelming amount of active duty military votes. The likely outcome of counting the overseas ballots would have been that Gore didn&#8217;t win the popular vote after all. His handlers wisely talked him out of it.As for whether or not he would have been better than Bush. I doubt it. They are both slaves to the corportaions and special interests they serve. He certainly never did or said anything during his vice presidency that impressed me, but I admit that would have been difficult when you are dealing with a co-presidency, half of which caused the democrats as many problems as the elected half.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: XXX</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/06/will_social_con/#comment-54466</link>
		<dc:creator>XXX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jun 2006 15:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/06/will_social_conhtml/#comment-54466</guid>
		<description>Good point about enforcement, Nick. That&#039;s got to be a key on illegal immigration. Everybody is making a lot of noise about holding employers accountable now, but we know it&#039;ll get a lot quieter after the elections. And I seriously doubt if republicans will be the party that deals with renegade employers. Big Business owns the republican party.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point about enforcement, Nick. That&#8217;s got to be a key on illegal immigration. Everybody is making a lot of noise about holding employers accountable now, but we know it&#8217;ll get a lot quieter after the elections. And I seriously doubt if republicans will be the party that deals with renegade employers. Big Business owns the republican party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brown</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/06/will_social_con/#comment-54464</link>
		<dc:creator>brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jun 2006 15:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/06/will_social_conhtml/#comment-54464</guid>
		<description>Nick,All of the little incidents you listed that are your version of why Democrats lost in 2000 really ignore the real reason. You are not correct in stating the Republicans didn&#039;t really do anything to win. They went to the U S Supreme court to get the Florida recount stopped. If they had let it play out, we probably would have had Al Gore as president instead of the empty suit we have now.Any republican who thinks we would be worse off with Gore than the shrub is guilty of wishful thinking.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick,All of the little incidents you listed that are your version of why Democrats lost in 2000 really ignore the real reason. You are not correct in stating the Republicans didn&#8217;t really do anything to win. They went to the U S Supreme court to get the Florida recount stopped. If they had let it play out, we probably would have had Al Gore as president instead of the empty suit we have now.Any republican who thinks we would be worse off with Gore than the shrub is guilty of wishful thinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/06/will_social_con/#comment-54462</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jun 2006 15:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/06/will_social_conhtml/#comment-54462</guid>
		<description>Imagine that DD. Returning to the traditional values and the &quot;american dream.&quot; What a novel concept. It will never occur to them, nor will securing the borders and enforcing severe sanctions against employeers that hire illegal aliens. Either positon could easily sweep either party to control across the country. Of course either postion carries with it a loss of support from their corporate masters.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imagine that DD. Returning to the traditional values and the &#8220;american dream.&#8221; What a novel concept. It will never occur to them, nor will securing the borders and enforcing severe sanctions against employeers that hire illegal aliens. Either positon could easily sweep either party to control across the country. Of course either postion carries with it a loss of support from their corporate masters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J M Walker</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/06/will_social_con/#comment-54460</link>
		<dc:creator>J M Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jun 2006 15:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/06/will_social_conhtml/#comment-54460</guid>
		<description>DD,How do you make it palatable to the public with regard to who pays? The Republicans are going to come back with &quot;Do you want higher taxes to pay for the slob on the street who won&#039;t get a job?&quot;.

The democrats are going to have to push the class thing again, but do so in a way that placates the middle income voter. How about using Ken Lay, et al, as an example of the morally repugnant right picking tax payers clean? The people earning multi-millions, with deferred payments, no taxes and benefits are going to have to have loopholes closed and start paying. There are so many businesses out there paying little or no taxes, that it&#039;s a free-for-all as to who to use. Big oil, for one: Stop subsidies, royalties, etc, etc.

Make the average voter know their hit will be minimal and the money will come from closed loopholes, ended subsidies and controlled waste and fraud. The moneys out there, but it will take people with major huevos to do what has to be done. The Democrats can do it, but it will take some serious new thinking.

And a serious time-table for getting us out of Iraq.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DD,How do you make it palatable to the public with regard to who pays? The Republicans are going to come back with &#8220;Do you want higher taxes to pay for the slob on the street who won&#8217;t get a job?&#8221;.</p>
<p>The democrats are going to have to push the class thing again, but do so in a way that placates the middle income voter. How about using Ken Lay, et al, as an example of the morally repugnant right picking tax payers clean? The people earning multi-millions, with deferred payments, no taxes and benefits are going to have to have loopholes closed and start paying. There are so many businesses out there paying little or no taxes, that it&#8217;s a free-for-all as to who to use. Big oil, for one: Stop subsidies, royalties, etc, etc.</p>
<p>Make the average voter know their hit will be minimal and the money will come from closed loopholes, ended subsidies and controlled waste and fraud. The moneys out there, but it will take people with major huevos to do what has to be done. The Democrats can do it, but it will take some serious new thinking.</p>
<p>And a serious time-table for getting us out of Iraq.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darwin'sDisciple</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/06/will_social_con/#comment-54458</link>
		<dc:creator>Darwin'sDisciple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jun 2006 14:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/06/will_social_conhtml/#comment-54458</guid>
		<description>Walker is right.

Walker and others, what should be the Democratic Party&#039;s number one message to voters.

How about:

Working people should be able to afford what they need:  housing, health care, food, gasoline, &amp; college for their kids.

Other, better, ideas?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Walker is right.</p>
<p>Walker and others, what should be the Democratic Party&#8217;s number one message to voters.</p>
<p>How about:</p>
<p>Working people should be able to afford what they need:  housing, health care, food, gasoline, &amp; college for their kids.</p>
<p>Other, better, ideas?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
