<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8216;It&#8217;s not theology&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/its_not_theolog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/its_not_theolog/</link>
	<description>The Wichita Eagle Editorial Department Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 04:37:59 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ksfarmgrrl</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/its_not_theolog/#comment-45380</link>
		<dc:creator>ksfarmgrrl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 15:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/05/its_not_theologhtml/#comment-45380</guid>
		<description>And YOU are the sole decider on what is the truth. Not only for yourself, but for everyone else as well.

I dont care how you dress up your words or pretend that you are a force for good. Your true self will always out.

We see you for what you are nathan. You can pretend to be different, but until you ARE different, it is just another costume.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And YOU are the sole decider on what is the truth. Not only for yourself, but for everyone else as well.</p>
<p>I dont care how you dress up your words or pretend that you are a force for good. Your true self will always out.</p>
<p>We see you for what you are nathan. You can pretend to be different, but until you ARE different, it is just another costume.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/its_not_theolog/#comment-45379</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 03:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/05/its_not_theologhtml/#comment-45379</guid>
		<description>I will never be ashamed of the truth KFG.

I probably do need to practice on being a bit more loving in my approach to it here on the blog and I have been trying to work on that.

Unfortunately I get a little too caught up in preaching the truth instead of lovingly explaining it.

Either way, no matter how I say it, it will still be offensive to you KFG.

The truth is not always kind.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will never be ashamed of the truth KFG.</p>
<p>I probably do need to practice on being a bit more loving in my approach to it here on the blog and I have been trying to work on that.</p>
<p>Unfortunately I get a little too caught up in preaching the truth instead of lovingly explaining it.</p>
<p>Either way, no matter how I say it, it will still be offensive to you KFG.</p>
<p>The truth is not always kind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/its_not_theolog/#comment-45378</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 20:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/05/its_not_theologhtml/#comment-45378</guid>
		<description>And to think I was married by a judge when I could have had Elvis.  Man - what was I thinking?!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And to think I was married by a judge when I could have had Elvis.  Man &#8211; what was I thinking?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jed</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/its_not_theolog/#comment-45377</link>
		<dc:creator>Jed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 20:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/05/its_not_theologhtml/#comment-45377</guid>
		<description>Hey, what could possibly be more sacred than Elvis?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, what could possibly be more sacred than Elvis?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ksfarmgrrl</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/its_not_theolog/#comment-45376</link>
		<dc:creator>ksfarmgrrl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 19:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/05/its_not_theologhtml/#comment-45376</guid>
		<description>Hee hee julie. You must have been thinking that you had respect for the institution of marriage. And it shows when you and mm look at each other. Nice to see.

Although the elvis impersonator might have made for more memorable pictures....
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hee hee julie. You must have been thinking that you had respect for the institution of marriage. And it shows when you and mm look at each other. Nice to see.</p>
<p>Although the elvis impersonator might have made for more memorable pictures&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ksfarmgrrl</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/its_not_theolog/#comment-45375</link>
		<dc:creator>ksfarmgrrl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 19:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/05/its_not_theologhtml/#comment-45375</guid>
		<description>Uh... two drunk straight people who let him perform the ceremony? And then get an annulment?

Now THAT is sacred. Damn gays for ruining it anyway!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh&#8230; two drunk straight people who let him perform the ceremony? And then get an annulment?</p>
<p>Now THAT is sacred. Damn gays for ruining it anyway!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ksfarmgrrl</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/its_not_theolog/#comment-45374</link>
		<dc:creator>ksfarmgrrl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 19:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/05/its_not_theologhtml/#comment-45374</guid>
		<description>About what I would expect jed. Gay marriage is bad, but wife beating is good!!

More kansas family values. But please, continue to keep marriage sacred. All those elvis impersonators in las vegas need more drunks to marry!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About what I would expect jed. Gay marriage is bad, but wife beating is good!!</p>
<p>More kansas family values. But please, continue to keep marriage sacred. All those elvis impersonators in las vegas need more drunks to marry!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jed</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/its_not_theolog/#comment-45373</link>
		<dc:creator>Jed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 19:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/05/its_not_theologhtml/#comment-45373</guid>
		<description>Nathan,Just the tax laws. If your church would just go ahead and pay it&#039;s taxes as a political organization, it could then say whatever it wants!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nathan,Just the tax laws. If your church would just go ahead and pay it&#8217;s taxes as a political organization, it could then say whatever it wants!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jed</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/its_not_theolog/#comment-45372</link>
		<dc:creator>Jed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 19:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/05/its_not_theologhtml/#comment-45372</guid>
		<description>Farm Gal,Some years back, I got a phone call from a priest who was doing the research necessary to grant an annulment of a friend&#039;s ex-husband. I told the priest that the guy in question was a control freak who beat my friend bloody on numerous occasions and abused his kids constantly. After some conversation, the priest promised that the man would not be permitted to marry in the church until he had undergone extensive therapy. My friend got a notice that her ex had been married in the church the following week! Never take the word of a priest!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Farm Gal,Some years back, I got a phone call from a priest who was doing the research necessary to grant an annulment of a friend&#8217;s ex-husband. I told the priest that the guy in question was a control freak who beat my friend bloody on numerous occasions and abused his kids constantly. After some conversation, the priest promised that the man would not be permitted to marry in the church until he had undergone extensive therapy. My friend got a notice that her ex had been married in the church the following week! Never take the word of a priest!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ksfarmgrrl</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/its_not_theolog/#comment-45371</link>
		<dc:creator>ksfarmgrrl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 19:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/05/its_not_theologhtml/#comment-45371</guid>
		<description>I hope they dont shut up. I hope they keep doing exactly what they are doing. Keep showing us the truth of who they are and what they stand for.

I hope you continue to post so people can see the truth about dominion and equal justice and the agenda of toxics like you.

Please. Can you make it even more clear for the readers here? I would LOVE it.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope they dont shut up. I hope they keep doing exactly what they are doing. Keep showing us the truth of who they are and what they stand for.</p>
<p>I hope you continue to post so people can see the truth about dominion and equal justice and the agenda of toxics like you.</p>
<p>Please. Can you make it even more clear for the readers here? I would LOVE it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/its_not_theolog/#comment-45370</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 18:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/05/its_not_theologhtml/#comment-45370</guid>
		<description>KFG,

No matter how much you want to shut Christians up, it is not going to happen.

They are not breaking any laws.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KFG,</p>
<p>No matter how much you want to shut Christians up, it is not going to happen.</p>
<p>They are not breaking any laws.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ksfarmgrrl</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/its_not_theolog/#comment-45369</link>
		<dc:creator>ksfarmgrrl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 18:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/05/its_not_theologhtml/#comment-45369</guid>
		<description>Jed, I got an email this week from friends who said the catholic churches last sunday passed around things to sign to send to their congressmen telling them to vote against equal protection under the law. Except they said something like &quot;protect marrigae&quot;.

heheh. first, where is the IRS when you need them to examine campaigns in church, and second, I see how well the church is protecting marriage.

No divorce? No problem. We&#039;ll just wink and call it annulment. THAT will protect marriage against those mean old gays.

heheh. Separation of church and state. right.

I wonder if those churches, and I know which ones they are, filed finance reports with the kansas ethics commission?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jed, I got an email this week from friends who said the catholic churches last sunday passed around things to sign to send to their congressmen telling them to vote against equal protection under the law. Except they said something like &#8220;protect marrigae&#8221;.</p>
<p>heheh. first, where is the IRS when you need them to examine campaigns in church, and second, I see how well the church is protecting marriage.</p>
<p>No divorce? No problem. We&#8217;ll just wink and call it annulment. THAT will protect marriage against those mean old gays.</p>
<p>heheh. Separation of church and state. right.</p>
<p>I wonder if those churches, and I know which ones they are, filed finance reports with the kansas ethics commission?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jed</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/its_not_theolog/#comment-45368</link>
		<dc:creator>Jed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 18:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/05/its_not_theologhtml/#comment-45368</guid>
		<description>Nathan,&quot;and blaming gay people for everything from hurricanes to ingrown toenails&quot;

I believe it was Pat Robertson who blamed the gay population of New Orleans for Katrina, and a bunch of others jumped on that bandwagon. I may have exagerated a bit on the ingrown toenails.The half dozen or so churces that I look in on from time to time are right here in Wichita, except for one in Augusta. And no, no alternate universe, but I&#039;ve been looking for one so I can get the hell out of the one you, Outlander and Ian are in!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nathan,&#8221;and blaming gay people for everything from hurricanes to ingrown toenails&#8221;</p>
<p>I believe it was Pat Robertson who blamed the gay population of New Orleans for Katrina, and a bunch of others jumped on that bandwagon. I may have exagerated a bit on the ingrown toenails.The half dozen or so churces that I look in on from time to time are right here in Wichita, except for one in Augusta. And no, no alternate universe, but I&#8217;ve been looking for one so I can get the hell out of the one you, Outlander and Ian are in!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ksfarmgrrl</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/its_not_theolog/#comment-45367</link>
		<dc:creator>ksfarmgrrl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 15:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/05/its_not_theologhtml/#comment-45367</guid>
		<description>Sounds like blow, the price family, outlander, todd, etc.

&quot;Dont confuse me with the facts!&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like blow, the price family, outlander, todd, etc.</p>
<p>&#8220;Dont confuse me with the facts!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RD</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/its_not_theolog/#comment-45366</link>
		<dc:creator>RD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 23:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/05/its_not_theologhtml/#comment-45366</guid>
		<description>Instigator, how do you know what the book or movie says about Leonardo if you&#039;ve never seen or read either?.

&quot;I&#039;ve made up my mind and even the truth can&#039;t change it.&quot;

Sound familiar anyone?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Instigator, how do you know what the book or movie says about Leonardo if you&#8217;ve never seen or read either?.</p>
<p>&#8220;I&#8217;ve made up my mind and even the truth can&#8217;t change it.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sound familiar anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Instigator</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/its_not_theolog/#comment-45365</link>
		<dc:creator>Instigator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 22:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/05/its_not_theologhtml/#comment-45365</guid>
		<description>I won&#039;t be reading or seeing the Da Vinci Code because I think it denagrates a great person. . . Leonardo.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I won&#8217;t be reading or seeing the Da Vinci Code because I think it denagrates a great person. . . Leonardo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ksfarmgrrl</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/its_not_theolog/#comment-45364</link>
		<dc:creator>ksfarmgrrl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 15:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/05/its_not_theologhtml/#comment-45364</guid>
		<description>Sam, not picking on you personally, you just happen to be here :)

&quot;Christians don&#039;t make the rules, and we can&#039;t change them. You become a Christian when you decide to follow Christ and play by God&#039;s rules.&quot;

Oh, so when did god repeal the blue laws that protected the sabbath? When did god repeal the law about remarriage after divorce? When did god repeal the laws about cheeseburgers and shrimp and mixed racial marriages?

Or were those christian legiislators who changed those rules?

Indeed sam, christians do make the rules of law in this state and this country. They can also repeal them when THEY decide they no longer needed to be followed. Unless I am missing something, god remains silent on the rules. It is HUMANS who make them up and change them at whim.

Either that, or I must not be getting god&#039;s emails about when the rules change. Only legislators can apparantly access that account. And activist judges who are by and large christian. :)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sam, not picking on you personally, you just happen to be here :)</p>
<p>&#8220;Christians don&#8217;t make the rules, and we can&#8217;t change them. You become a Christian when you decide to follow Christ and play by God&#8217;s rules.&#8221;</p>
<p>Oh, so when did god repeal the blue laws that protected the sabbath? When did god repeal the law about remarriage after divorce? When did god repeal the laws about cheeseburgers and shrimp and mixed racial marriages?</p>
<p>Or were those christian legiislators who changed those rules?</p>
<p>Indeed sam, christians do make the rules of law in this state and this country. They can also repeal them when THEY decide they no longer needed to be followed. Unless I am missing something, god remains silent on the rules. It is HUMANS who make them up and change them at whim.</p>
<p>Either that, or I must not be getting god&#8217;s emails about when the rules change. Only legislators can apparantly access that account. And activist judges who are by and large christian. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kansassam</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/its_not_theolog/#comment-45363</link>
		<dc:creator>kansassam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 14:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/05/its_not_theologhtml/#comment-45363</guid>
		<description>KFG..&quot;Sam, I thought there was no order of magnitude concerning sin.&quot;

I think that&#039;s what I was saying.. in a toungue-in-cheek sorta way!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KFG..&#8221;Sam, I thought there was no order of magnitude concerning sin.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think that&#8217;s what I was saying.. in a toungue-in-cheek sorta way!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Outlander</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/its_not_theolog/#comment-45362</link>
		<dc:creator>Outlander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 14:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/05/its_not_theologhtml/#comment-45362</guid>
		<description>Uh Scott, from past experience, I&#039;m afraid that a theology lesson is probably wasted; and I&#039;m not worthy to speak on behalf of evangelical Christianity. But here goes anyway.

Christians don&#039;t make the rules, and we can&#039;t change them.  You become a Christian when you decide to follow Christ and play by God&#039;s rules.

Having said that, when it comes to being born again, sexual orientation is irrelevant. All are sinners and fall short.  However, when you are born again, you will recognize your sin and do what you can to avoid sin and please God.

Jed; teller of stories, you should find out what Dobson&#039;s position really is. It might surprise you.


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh Scott, from past experience, I&#8217;m afraid that a theology lesson is probably wasted; and I&#8217;m not worthy to speak on behalf of evangelical Christianity. But here goes anyway.</p>
<p>Christians don&#8217;t make the rules, and we can&#8217;t change them.  You become a Christian when you decide to follow Christ and play by God&#8217;s rules.</p>
<p>Having said that, when it comes to being born again, sexual orientation is irrelevant. All are sinners and fall short.  However, when you are born again, you will recognize your sin and do what you can to avoid sin and please God.</p>
<p>Jed; teller of stories, you should find out what Dobson&#8217;s position really is. It might surprise you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ksfarmgrrl</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/its_not_theolog/#comment-45361</link>
		<dc:creator>ksfarmgrrl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 13:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/05/its_not_theologhtml/#comment-45361</guid>
		<description>Sam, I thought there was no order of magnitude concerning sin. But perhaps that is not the christian perspective.

&quot;What a slippery slope this could become.. when we make a constitutional amendment against liars... who in the heck is going to be left to run our government??&quot;

What makes one sin worthy of a constitutional amendment and another sin, like bush lying, or jesse helms fathering an out of wedlock child, a mark of character to so many christians?

Must be only a &quot;select&quot; few committing those sins.

Who said here that when christians look good, they all wanna be a part of the bandwagon, and when they dont look good, it&#039;s every man for himself?

Yea, falwell blames gays for 9/11 and pat blames gays for hurricane katrina. But then, they are just part of the &quot;select&quot; few, right?

And taliban terry, jesus joe and pharasee phred have NEVER issued the kinds of comments jed mentions.

I mean, who you gonna believe? Jed, or those lying ears of yours?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sam, I thought there was no order of magnitude concerning sin. But perhaps that is not the christian perspective.</p>
<p>&#8220;What a slippery slope this could become.. when we make a constitutional amendment against liars&#8230; who in the heck is going to be left to run our government??&#8221;</p>
<p>What makes one sin worthy of a constitutional amendment and another sin, like bush lying, or jesse helms fathering an out of wedlock child, a mark of character to so many christians?</p>
<p>Must be only a &#8220;select&#8221; few committing those sins.</p>
<p>Who said here that when christians look good, they all wanna be a part of the bandwagon, and when they dont look good, it&#8217;s every man for himself?</p>
<p>Yea, falwell blames gays for 9/11 and pat blames gays for hurricane katrina. But then, they are just part of the &#8220;select&#8221; few, right?</p>
<p>And taliban terry, jesus joe and pharasee phred have NEVER issued the kinds of comments jed mentions.</p>
<p>I mean, who you gonna believe? Jed, or those lying ears of yours?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kansassam</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/its_not_theolog/#comment-45360</link>
		<dc:creator>kansassam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 11:07:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/05/its_not_theologhtml/#comment-45360</guid>
		<description>KFG..&quot;homosexuality is a sin. (period)

So is straight adultry. period.

When will we have a constitutional amendment on that subject?&quot;

What a slippery slope this could become.. when we make a constitutional amendment against liars... who in the heck is going to be left to run our government??

But then again, I wouldn&#039;t want to repeal all the laws against murder and stealing. So, we NEED some moral law.. but the marriage amendment went too far. Church &quot;marriages&quot; should be protected by the church.. gay &quot;unions&quot; should be protected by Caesar. Notice that Jesus did not whip up on the money changers OUTSIDE his Father&#039;s house.....
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KFG..&#8221;homosexuality is a sin. (period)</p>
<p>So is straight adultry. period.</p>
<p>When will we have a constitutional amendment on that subject?&#8221;</p>
<p>What a slippery slope this could become.. when we make a constitutional amendment against liars&#8230; who in the heck is going to be left to run our government??</p>
<p>But then again, I wouldn&#8217;t want to repeal all the laws against murder and stealing. So, we NEED some moral law.. but the marriage amendment went too far. Church &#8220;marriages&#8221; should be protected by the church.. gay &#8220;unions&#8221; should be protected by Caesar. Notice that Jesus did not whip up on the money changers OUTSIDE his Father&#8217;s house&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/its_not_theolog/#comment-45359</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 08:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/05/its_not_theologhtml/#comment-45359</guid>
		<description>I am not just talking about the &quot;gay agenda&quot;

I am talking about these comments:

&quot;and blaming gay people for everything from hurricanes to ingrown toenails&quot;

Besides a very select few ignorant people who say these things it is not as predominent as you say.

Half dozen churches?

Sigh... where do you live?  In some alternate universe?

Where are all these Christians and Christian churches you are always talking about?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not just talking about the &#8220;gay agenda&#8221;</p>
<p>I am talking about these comments:</p>
<p>&#8220;and blaming gay people for everything from hurricanes to ingrown toenails&#8221;</p>
<p>Besides a very select few ignorant people who say these things it is not as predominent as you say.</p>
<p>Half dozen churches?</p>
<p>Sigh&#8230; where do you live?  In some alternate universe?</p>
<p>Where are all these Christians and Christian churches you are always talking about?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jed</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/its_not_theolog/#comment-45358</link>
		<dc:creator>Jed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 07:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/05/its_not_theologhtml/#comment-45358</guid>
		<description>Nathan,Well, let&#039;s see- there&#039;s Jerry Falwell, Pat Robertson, Donald Wildmon and James Dobson to start off with. I&#039;m not mentioning the local churches, since I&#039;d like to maintain my anonymity there, but there are about half a dozen I look in on from time to time, especially when certain issues are being discussed.Suffice it to say, if you haven&#039;t heard about &quot;The Gay Agenda,&quot; you must&#039;ve missed a lot of Sundays and a lot of church magazines.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nathan,Well, let&#8217;s see- there&#8217;s Jerry Falwell, Pat Robertson, Donald Wildmon and James Dobson to start off with. I&#8217;m not mentioning the local churches, since I&#8217;d like to maintain my anonymity there, but there are about half a dozen I look in on from time to time, especially when certain issues are being discussed.Suffice it to say, if you haven&#8217;t heard about &#8220;The Gay Agenda,&#8221; you must&#8217;ve missed a lot of Sundays and a lot of church magazines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jed</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/its_not_theolog/#comment-45357</link>
		<dc:creator>Jed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 06:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/05/its_not_theologhtml/#comment-45357</guid>
		<description>RD,Making books into movies is always difficult, because so much has to be cut, or doesn&#039;t translate onto film. I still prefer books, too.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RD,Making books into movies is always difficult, because so much has to be cut, or doesn&#8217;t translate onto film. I still prefer books, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RD</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/its_not_theolog/#comment-45356</link>
		<dc:creator>RD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 05:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/05/its_not_theologhtml/#comment-45356</guid>
		<description>My daughter and I saw the Da Vinci Code today.  We were almost 10 minutes late, so she was a tad confused.  I felt there was a lot left out, especially explanation, but part of that might be because we didn&#039;t see the beginning.  We also sat very close to the front, which screws up my perspective somehow.  All in all, not the blockbuster it could&#039;ve been (the ending was changed some), but not all that bad either.

I still prefer the book.  I usually do.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My daughter and I saw the Da Vinci Code today.  We were almost 10 minutes late, so she was a tad confused.  I felt there was a lot left out, especially explanation, but part of that might be because we didn&#8217;t see the beginning.  We also sat very close to the front, which screws up my perspective somehow.  All in all, not the blockbuster it could&#8217;ve been (the ending was changed some), but not all that bad either.</p>
<p>I still prefer the book.  I usually do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
