<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does ACLU care only about others&#8217; free speech?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/does_aclu_care_/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/does_aclu_care_/</link>
	<description>The Wichita Eagle Editorial Department Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 23:23:53 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/does_aclu_care_/#comment-43776</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 May 2006 01:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/05/does_aclu_care_html/#comment-43776</guid>
		<description>Yes JR,

Pride COMETH before the fall...

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes JR,</p>
<p>Pride COMETH before the fall&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J R</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/does_aclu_care_/#comment-43775</link>
		<dc:creator>J R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2006 05:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/05/does_aclu_care_html/#comment-43775</guid>
		<description>Nathan I&#039;ve no need to feel important about myself. I DO take a great deal of pleasure in taking apart those who do. I also do not pontificate that my ideas and posts are divinely inspired or get god to fight my fights. You know, like you do.

&quot;Pride goeth before a fall&quot; or don&#039;t you know that Nathan?

I AM humbled when folks I consider wiser than me acknowledge something I post.

I don&#039;t do &quot;great posts&quot; kfg. I get lucky now and again mostly on the weakness of my &quot;enemies&quot;. That last of mine must have been adequate enough to shut down Heckler NOW as it did then.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nathan I&#8217;ve no need to feel important about myself. I DO take a great deal of pleasure in taking apart those who do. I also do not pontificate that my ideas and posts are divinely inspired or get god to fight my fights. You know, like you do.</p>
<p>&#8220;Pride goeth before a fall&#8221; or don&#8217;t you know that Nathan?</p>
<p>I AM humbled when folks I consider wiser than me acknowledge something I post.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t do &#8220;great posts&#8221; kfg. I get lucky now and again mostly on the weakness of my &#8220;enemies&#8221;. That last of mine must have been adequate enough to shut down Heckler NOW as it did then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ksfarmgrrl</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/does_aclu_care_/#comment-43774</link>
		<dc:creator>ksfarmgrrl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 15:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/05/does_aclu_care_html/#comment-43774</guid>
		<description>Great post JR. The truth really hurts &#039;em doesnt it?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post JR. The truth really hurts &#8216;em doesnt it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/does_aclu_care_/#comment-43773</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 08:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/05/does_aclu_care_html/#comment-43773</guid>
		<description>JR...

A legend in his own mind on the WE blog.

It must be nice to have somewhere to feel so important about yourself.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JR&#8230;</p>
<p>A legend in his own mind on the WE blog.</p>
<p>It must be nice to have somewhere to feel so important about yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J R</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/does_aclu_care_/#comment-43772</link>
		<dc:creator>J R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 06:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/05/does_aclu_care_html/#comment-43772</guid>
		<description>I apologize that I cannot simply post the link to this. Here is a cut and paste.

And now an oldy but a goody. Heckler gets his clock cleaned and quits the field. That old thread ends with a comment on my post which Heckler did not choose to (couldn&#039;t?) refute.

The subject was Social Security.

Awww at last Heckler REVEALED. &quot;Works for a corporate producer of airliners.&quot;That makes you a Boeing mid manager Heckler. That also makes you among the lowest of human life.The debate was social security. I admire you Heckler. You went off topic by keeping to topic........your topic.I will stay on topic. You and such as you seek to destroy Social Security.Ya gotta forgive me a little vitriol Heckler. I truly despise folks like you. &quot;I worked hard , I made myself a a valued employee&quot;Translation: You stabbed your co-workers in the back and kept your nose strategiclly placed at the rear end of your supervisor.Hey and that would be fine for you. I got the number of cretins like you a long time ago.But back to the issue.You love your work Heckler. Your nose is up your employers wazoo and hence anyone who you have authority over........well if it&#039;s good for you......then you gotta get some noses in your rear end.Most people are not like you Heckler. Oh they do have to answer to creeps like you. But mostly they are about simply getting by. They like that at the end of their servitude to folks and employers like you that society offers them a respite....and rest. They deserve that.Oh but that sits uneasy with people like you. You gotta keep working and you gotta keep others working for or under you. Your only comfort in this is making others as miserable and unfulfilled as you are. Most people work to live. YOu live to work and work others.Work til ya drop dead Heckler. (Sooner than later I hope) But don&#039;t work others til they drop dead.Lower the age for Social Security. Increase the benefits. Tax heavily those who make their fortune on the backs of others to fund it. In short........make the employers beg for workers.Posted by: J R  &#124; August 31, 2005 at 12:50 AMHeckler, I think JR has your number.Posted by: XXX &#124; August 31, 2005 at 05:54 AM

Want more Heckler? We have danced and danced and I always lead. I invite you to show me or anyone where your hand was on your opponents ass or your foot striking it.

Oh but I will leave you an out. The ACLU. American Civil Liberties Union. Clearly your trouble is not with the &quot;American&quot; part. You are a flag waver. Civil? well you are fairly civil, more so than me. You are just misguided. Maybe &quot;Liberties&quot; is your difficulty. You proudly embrace a President that denies them.

Or is it &quot;Union&quot; that troubles you? Maybe that is it.

The ACLU defended RUSH LIMBAUGH Heckler. Who have you ever defended? Or is your province the proud accomplish of how many asses you have kicked vs. kissed?

Game, set, match.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I apologize that I cannot simply post the link to this. Here is a cut and paste.</p>
<p>And now an oldy but a goody. Heckler gets his clock cleaned and quits the field. That old thread ends with a comment on my post which Heckler did not choose to (couldn&#8217;t?) refute.</p>
<p>The subject was Social Security.</p>
<p>Awww at last Heckler REVEALED. &#8220;Works for a corporate producer of airliners.&#8221;That makes you a Boeing mid manager Heckler. That also makes you among the lowest of human life.The debate was social security. I admire you Heckler. You went off topic by keeping to topic&#8230;&#8230;..your topic.I will stay on topic. You and such as you seek to destroy Social Security.Ya gotta forgive me a little vitriol Heckler. I truly despise folks like you. &#8220;I worked hard , I made myself a a valued employee&#8221;Translation: You stabbed your co-workers in the back and kept your nose strategiclly placed at the rear end of your supervisor.Hey and that would be fine for you. I got the number of cretins like you a long time ago.But back to the issue.You love your work Heckler. Your nose is up your employers wazoo and hence anyone who you have authority over&#8230;&#8230;..well if it&#8217;s good for you&#8230;&#8230;then you gotta get some noses in your rear end.Most people are not like you Heckler. Oh they do have to answer to creeps like you. But mostly they are about simply getting by. They like that at the end of their servitude to folks and employers like you that society offers them a respite&#8230;.and rest. They deserve that.Oh but that sits uneasy with people like you. You gotta keep working and you gotta keep others working for or under you. Your only comfort in this is making others as miserable and unfulfilled as you are. Most people work to live. YOu live to work and work others.Work til ya drop dead Heckler. (Sooner than later I hope) But don&#8217;t work others til they drop dead.Lower the age for Social Security. Increase the benefits. Tax heavily those who make their fortune on the backs of others to fund it. In short&#8230;&#8230;..make the employers beg for workers.Posted by: J R  | August 31, 2005 at 12:50 AMHeckler, I think JR has your number.Posted by: XXX | August 31, 2005 at 05:54 AM</p>
<p>Want more Heckler? We have danced and danced and I always lead. I invite you to show me or anyone where your hand was on your opponents ass or your foot striking it.</p>
<p>Oh but I will leave you an out. The ACLU. American Civil Liberties Union. Clearly your trouble is not with the &#8220;American&#8221; part. You are a flag waver. Civil? well you are fairly civil, more so than me. You are just misguided. Maybe &#8220;Liberties&#8221; is your difficulty. You proudly embrace a President that denies them.</p>
<p>Or is it &#8220;Union&#8221; that troubles you? Maybe that is it.</p>
<p>The ACLU defended RUSH LIMBAUGH Heckler. Who have you ever defended? Or is your province the proud accomplish of how many asses you have kicked vs. kissed?</p>
<p>Game, set, match.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J R</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/does_aclu_care_/#comment-43771</link>
		<dc:creator>J R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 04:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/05/does_aclu_care_html/#comment-43771</guid>
		<description>Why thank you heckler! I take as a great complment your comparison me to kfg.    Don&#039;t make me do a bonedig to show one of our many battles where I cleaned your clock or sent you scurrying away.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why thank you heckler! I take as a great complment your comparison me to kfg.    Don&#8217;t make me do a bonedig to show one of our many battles where I cleaned your clock or sent you scurrying away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/does_aclu_care_/#comment-43770</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 03:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/05/does_aclu_care_html/#comment-43770</guid>
		<description>I could be wrong... but I don&#039;t think anyone ever said the ACLU was always wrong.

I would say it is 70/30 or close to 80/20 in favor of them being wrong...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could be wrong&#8230; but I don&#8217;t think anyone ever said the ACLU was always wrong.</p>
<p>I would say it is 70/30 or close to 80/20 in favor of them being wrong&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gster</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/does_aclu_care_/#comment-43769</link>
		<dc:creator>gster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 03:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/05/does_aclu_care_html/#comment-43769</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s see,... if the ACLU  was always clearly wrong, then they wouldn&#039;t have any success in the court system, and therefore I wouldn&#039;t have any problem. Somehow, I have to turn this argument 180 degrees around. I know; I&#039;ll just refuse to see this!!Eureka.. Ir works!!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s see,&#8230; if the ACLU  was always clearly wrong, then they wouldn&#8217;t have any success in the court system, and therefore I wouldn&#8217;t have any problem. Somehow, I have to turn this argument 180 degrees around. I know; I&#8217;ll just refuse to see this!!Eureka.. Ir works!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/does_aclu_care_/#comment-43768</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 03:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/05/does_aclu_care_html/#comment-43768</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t you find it odd that the ACLU meets in secret yet fights for open records?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t you find it odd that the ACLU meets in secret yet fights for open records?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/does_aclu_care_/#comment-43767</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 03:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/05/does_aclu_care_html/#comment-43767</guid>
		<description>Rage,

The ACLU supposedly defends our civil liberties and supposedly is the defender of the Bill of Rights.

I find it odd that they will defend everyones rights when it comes to the 1st, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th... amendments yet they take the stance that the 2nd amendment gives no idividuals rights.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rage,</p>
<p>The ACLU supposedly defends our civil liberties and supposedly is the defender of the Bill of Rights.</p>
<p>I find it odd that they will defend everyones rights when it comes to the 1st, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th&#8230; amendments yet they take the stance that the 2nd amendment gives no idividuals rights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heckler</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/does_aclu_care_/#comment-43766</link>
		<dc:creator>Heckler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 01:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/05/does_aclu_care_html/#comment-43766</guid>
		<description>JR

You are just like KFG, you could take a 5 pound hammer to the side of the head and not realize you&#039;ve been hit. I swear, sometimes its as if your skull is made of hickory.

But I love you anyway.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JR</p>
<p>You are just like KFG, you could take a 5 pound hammer to the side of the head and not realize you&#8217;ve been hit. I swear, sometimes its as if your skull is made of hickory.</p>
<p>But I love you anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heckler</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/does_aclu_care_/#comment-43765</link>
		<dc:creator>Heckler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 01:17:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/05/does_aclu_care_html/#comment-43765</guid>
		<description>Rage

If you truly believe that the ACLU is nonpartisan and balanced in it&#039;s defense strategy then there is little point in me shaking you from your dillusions.

And I don&#039;t speak for Nathan but it would be my guess that he&#039;s wondering why the ACLU doesnt believe that the Second Amendment guarantees an individual right to keep and bear arms, a position taken by a strong majority of constitutional scholars, some of them admittedly anti-gun.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rage</p>
<p>If you truly believe that the ACLU is nonpartisan and balanced in it&#8217;s defense strategy then there is little point in me shaking you from your dillusions.</p>
<p>And I don&#8217;t speak for Nathan but it would be my guess that he&#8217;s wondering why the ACLU doesnt believe that the Second Amendment guarantees an individual right to keep and bear arms, a position taken by a strong majority of constitutional scholars, some of them admittedly anti-gun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rage</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/does_aclu_care_/#comment-43764</link>
		<dc:creator>Rage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 23:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/05/does_aclu_care_html/#comment-43764</guid>
		<description>Ah, yes, Heckler, the stale ole&#039; red-baiting attack on Roger Baldwin! You get credit for consistent unoriginality. Yes, Roger called himself a communist in his younger days, as did Bertrand Russell. . .and Robert Bork, and many others. He never did autocratically control the organization&#039;s principles, but by 1940 he was so virulently ANTI-communist that he forced an openly communist member for the National Board. . .in violation of the org&#039;s own rules. Not one of ACLU&#039;s prouder moments.

Regarding the ACLU today, well, &lt;a href=&quot;http://aclu.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://aclu.org&lt;/a&gt; tells you right where they stand, in your face!. . .funny, but I don&#039;t see anything there about the proletariat, means of production etc. . . in fact, its charter is staunchly non-partisan. I guess I must not have read closely enough. . . or maybe I need a new tinfoil hat!

Nathan, what position were you wanting them to take on the 2nd Amendment?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, yes, Heckler, the stale ole&#8217; red-baiting attack on Roger Baldwin! You get credit for consistent unoriginality. Yes, Roger called himself a communist in his younger days, as did Bertrand Russell. . .and Robert Bork, and many others. He never did autocratically control the organization&#8217;s principles, but by 1940 he was so virulently ANTI-communist that he forced an openly communist member for the National Board. . .in violation of the org&#8217;s own rules. Not one of ACLU&#8217;s prouder moments.</p>
<p>Regarding the ACLU today, well, <a href="http://aclu.org" rel="nofollow">http://aclu.org</a> tells you right where they stand, in your face!. . .funny, but I don&#8217;t see anything there about the proletariat, means of production etc. . . in fact, its charter is staunchly non-partisan. I guess I must not have read closely enough. . . or maybe I need a new tinfoil hat!</p>
<p>Nathan, what position were you wanting them to take on the 2nd Amendment?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ksfarmgrrl</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/does_aclu_care_/#comment-43763</link>
		<dc:creator>ksfarmgrrl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 21:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/05/does_aclu_care_html/#comment-43763</guid>
		<description>But here is where the swift boat LIES were refuted. heheh. Also where heck THINKS he kicked butt.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/rumsfeld_can_ru.html#comments&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/rumsfeld_can_ru.html#comments&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But here is where the swift boat LIES were refuted. heheh. Also where heck THINKS he kicked butt.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/rumsfeld_can_ru.html#comments" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/rumsfeld_can_ru.html#comments</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ksfarmgrrl</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/does_aclu_care_/#comment-43762</link>
		<dc:creator>ksfarmgrrl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 21:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/05/does_aclu_care_html/#comment-43762</guid>
		<description>So.... bones come home to roost.

Here is one thread where heck claims he kicked butt on the swift boaters subject

&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/open_thread.html#comments&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/open_thread.html#comments&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So&#8230;. bones come home to roost.</p>
<p>Here is one thread where heck claims he kicked butt on the swift boaters subject</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/open_thread.html#comments" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/open_thread.html#comments</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J R</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/does_aclu_care_/#comment-43761</link>
		<dc:creator>J R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 21:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/05/does_aclu_care_html/#comment-43761</guid>
		<description>Wow how did I miss this one?

I never saw Heckler stay still that long.

(whenever I see Heckler I hear music in my head. Remember &quot;Best Little Whorehouse in Texas&quot; and the song &quot;Dance a little  sidestep?&quot; That&#039;s the music)

Heckler I have been debating you longer than anyone else except maybe CF. You have NEVER kicked anyones ass. (honestly laughing here)I got this mental image of Heckler with one leg in a room  full of people who keep kicking him in the ass! lolEverytime he gets kicked he whirls on his attacker and yells &quot;I just kicked your ass!&quot;

I could do a bonedig myself.

Ah but back to kicking ass. I feel late and left out.

Wanna know my major beef with the ACLU heck? They defended no less than Rush &quot;popmbythedozen&quot; Limbaugh!

So your call of BS on the ACLU representing both liberals and conservatives isitself BS. I bet your feet stink too!

Look out Heckler just kicked my ass!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow how did I miss this one?</p>
<p>I never saw Heckler stay still that long.</p>
<p>(whenever I see Heckler I hear music in my head. Remember &#8220;Best Little Whorehouse in Texas&#8221; and the song &#8220;Dance a little  sidestep?&#8221; That&#8217;s the music)</p>
<p>Heckler I have been debating you longer than anyone else except maybe CF. You have NEVER kicked anyones ass. (honestly laughing here)I got this mental image of Heckler with one leg in a room  full of people who keep kicking him in the ass! lolEverytime he gets kicked he whirls on his attacker and yells &#8220;I just kicked your ass!&#8221;</p>
<p>I could do a bonedig myself.</p>
<p>Ah but back to kicking ass. I feel late and left out.</p>
<p>Wanna know my major beef with the ACLU heck? They defended no less than Rush &#8220;popmbythedozen&#8221; Limbaugh!</p>
<p>So your call of BS on the ACLU representing both liberals and conservatives isitself BS. I bet your feet stink too!</p>
<p>Look out Heckler just kicked my ass!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ksfarmgrrl</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/does_aclu_care_/#comment-43760</link>
		<dc:creator>ksfarmgrrl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 20:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/05/does_aclu_care_html/#comment-43760</guid>
		<description>heheh hecker wants us to respond to every outrageous remark he makes?

not that much bandwidth in ks

&quot;it has to do with the absurdity of what some people see&quot;

I couldnt have said it better Brian. Some things are so nuts they dont deserve a refutation.

but please, heck, feel free to declare victory
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>heheh hecker wants us to respond to every outrageous remark he makes?</p>
<p>not that much bandwidth in ks</p>
<p>&#8220;it has to do with the absurdity of what some people see&#8221;</p>
<p>I couldnt have said it better Brian. Some things are so nuts they dont deserve a refutation.</p>
<p>but please, heck, feel free to declare victory</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/does_aclu_care_/#comment-43759</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 20:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/05/does_aclu_care_html/#comment-43759</guid>
		<description>heckler,

Nothing to do with a sense of humor..it has to do with the absurdity of what some people see as evidence or proof. Just because I might label you an idiot doesn&#039;t make you one, and it certainly doesn&#039;t make any of your children or business partners idiots. I have to produce some tangible evidence (you know, something that can be touched, felt, read, etc.)to support the contention. On the other hand, you&#039;re free to produce it yourself as you are successfully doing right now.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>heckler,</p>
<p>Nothing to do with a sense of humor..it has to do with the absurdity of what some people see as evidence or proof. Just because I might label you an idiot doesn&#8217;t make you one, and it certainly doesn&#8217;t make any of your children or business partners idiots. I have to produce some tangible evidence (you know, something that can be touched, felt, read, etc.)to support the contention. On the other hand, you&#8217;re free to produce it yourself as you are successfully doing right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heckler</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/does_aclu_care_/#comment-43758</link>
		<dc:creator>Heckler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 20:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/05/does_aclu_care_html/#comment-43758</guid>
		<description>I also pointed out that Philips opening statement was BS and neither of you challenged that either.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also pointed out that Philips opening statement was BS and neither of you challenged that either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heckler</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/does_aclu_care_/#comment-43757</link>
		<dc:creator>Heckler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 20:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/05/does_aclu_care_html/#comment-43757</guid>
		<description>Brian

First of all, grow a sense of humor, don&#039;t get so damn touchy.

Second of all was anything I said false, misleading, or unreasonable?

I stated the position of the co-founder of the ACLU and made the charge that the ACLU seems to be following the intent of it&#039;s founder. Neither you or KFG really challenged the merits of the arguement, so I took the occasion to have a little more fun.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian</p>
<p>First of all, grow a sense of humor, don&#8217;t get so damn touchy.</p>
<p>Second of all was anything I said false, misleading, or unreasonable?</p>
<p>I stated the position of the co-founder of the ACLU and made the charge that the ACLU seems to be following the intent of it&#8217;s founder. Neither you or KFG really challenged the merits of the arguement, so I took the occasion to have a little more fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/does_aclu_care_/#comment-43756</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 20:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/05/does_aclu_care_html/#comment-43756</guid>
		<description>heckler,

You&#039;ve lost a whole lot of credibility with me that you used to have. Your attitude doesn&#039;t become you.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>heckler,</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve lost a whole lot of credibility with me that you used to have. Your attitude doesn&#8217;t become you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ksfarmgrrl</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/does_aclu_care_/#comment-43755</link>
		<dc:creator>ksfarmgrrl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 19:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/05/does_aclu_care_html/#comment-43755</guid>
		<description>hee hee, brian, my esteemed comrade...

nathan ties gays to poligamists and pedophiles and heckler ties the aclu to dead communists. when the facts are not on your side, the old stretching of the truth is in order.

More of that good christian honesty no doubt. What would values boy say about those false ties? That god ordered them?

hee hee comrade
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hee hee, brian, my esteemed comrade&#8230;</p>
<p>nathan ties gays to poligamists and pedophiles and heckler ties the aclu to dead communists. when the facts are not on your side, the old stretching of the truth is in order.</p>
<p>More of that good christian honesty no doubt. What would values boy say about those false ties? That god ordered them?</p>
<p>hee hee comrade</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heckler</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/does_aclu_care_/#comment-43754</link>
		<dc:creator>Heckler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 19:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/05/does_aclu_care_html/#comment-43754</guid>
		<description>Brian

Actions speak louder than words, I look at their actions.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian</p>
<p>Actions speak louder than words, I look at their actions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heckler</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/does_aclu_care_/#comment-43753</link>
		<dc:creator>Heckler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 19:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/05/does_aclu_care_html/#comment-43753</guid>
		<description>You two are such good comrades, I&#039;m sure Baldwin is smiling up at both of you right now.

The Wichita Daily Worker,ooops, Wichita Eagle Blog has many good comrades.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You two are such good comrades, I&#8217;m sure Baldwin is smiling up at both of you right now.</p>
<p>The Wichita Daily Worker,ooops, Wichita Eagle Blog has many good comrades.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ksfarmgrrl</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/does_aclu_care_/#comment-43752</link>
		<dc:creator>ksfarmgrrl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 19:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/05/does_aclu_care_html/#comment-43752</guid>
		<description>Would that be the dominion agenda of the toxic christianism proponents? Or the gay agenda? Or the neocon agenda?

So many agendas, so little time to think.

Good thing the hecklers of this world dont NEED time to think. They just look for which agenda values boy is shilling.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would that be the dominion agenda of the toxic christianism proponents? Or the gay agenda? Or the neocon agenda?</p>
<p>So many agendas, so little time to think.</p>
<p>Good thing the hecklers of this world dont NEED time to think. They just look for which agenda values boy is shilling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
