<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are we missing the point on gas prices?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/are_we_missing_/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/are_we_missing_/</link>
	<description>The Wichita Eagle Editorial Department Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 19:16:04 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ksfarmgrrl</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/are_we_missing_/#comment-48736</link>
		<dc:creator>ksfarmgrrl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2006 19:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/05/are_we_missing_html/#comment-48736</guid>
		<description>well said walker

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well said walker</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J M Walker</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/are_we_missing_/#comment-48735</link>
		<dc:creator>J M Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2006 19:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/05/are_we_missing_html/#comment-48735</guid>
		<description>There may not be any collusion between oil producers (shouldn&#039;t they be called extractors?), but there is a very immoral ripping off of the American people going on. The cost of oil rising does not make the cost of extracting or processing it increase. As such, shouldn&#039;t the government put a ceiling on profits made by the oil companies? They are advertising record profits, and for what? They&#039;re not putting the money back in exploration, or in building new refineries. These obscene profits are buying them a lot of Washington face time and a lot more Senators and Representatives. We already know they own the White House.

An example of how screwed up the oil company line of thinking is: The Indian nation has oil wells on their land. They are supposed to get royalties from the oil taken from their land by the oil companies. When they looked at the books, they found out that little or no money was coming in from the oil companies. (actually, I think it is the BIA that is supposed to pay out the royalties). What the Indians did was shut off the pumps. It took less than 24 hours for the oil companies to freak out and start screaming at the Indians for violating the so-called agreement they were supposed to have with the oil companies. Where was the money going? Guess.

So what can we do about it?

NO MORE INCUMBANTS!!!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There may not be any collusion between oil producers (shouldn&#8217;t they be called extractors?), but there is a very immoral ripping off of the American people going on. The cost of oil rising does not make the cost of extracting or processing it increase. As such, shouldn&#8217;t the government put a ceiling on profits made by the oil companies? They are advertising record profits, and for what? They&#8217;re not putting the money back in exploration, or in building new refineries. These obscene profits are buying them a lot of Washington face time and a lot more Senators and Representatives. We already know they own the White House.</p>
<p>An example of how screwed up the oil company line of thinking is: The Indian nation has oil wells on their land. They are supposed to get royalties from the oil taken from their land by the oil companies. When they looked at the books, they found out that little or no money was coming in from the oil companies. (actually, I think it is the BIA that is supposed to pay out the royalties). What the Indians did was shut off the pumps. It took less than 24 hours for the oil companies to freak out and start screaming at the Indians for violating the so-called agreement they were supposed to have with the oil companies. Where was the money going? Guess.</p>
<p>So what can we do about it?</p>
<p>NO MORE INCUMBANTS!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shocker'07</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/are_we_missing_/#comment-48734</link>
		<dc:creator>Shocker'07</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2006 18:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/05/are_we_missing_html/#comment-48734</guid>
		<description>DD, the &quot;strictly unethical&quot; part was merely a little jab at my good buddy KCL.

To me, the price hikes are unethical but I also recognize the right the oil companies have to charge what the market will bear.  The sticky situation is that what the market will bear will undoubtedly harm our economy and our influence on foreign governments.  In this situation, I do believe the government is justified in exerting some form of artificial downward pressure on gas prices.

To further clarify, I agree with you that they&#039;re not going to do it.  We&#039;re on our own, I&#039;m afraid, to figure out how to exert our own artificial downward pressure.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DD, the &#8220;strictly unethical&#8221; part was merely a little jab at my good buddy KCL.</p>
<p>To me, the price hikes are unethical but I also recognize the right the oil companies have to charge what the market will bear.  The sticky situation is that what the market will bear will undoubtedly harm our economy and our influence on foreign governments.  In this situation, I do believe the government is justified in exerting some form of artificial downward pressure on gas prices.</p>
<p>To further clarify, I agree with you that they&#8217;re not going to do it.  We&#8217;re on our own, I&#8217;m afraid, to figure out how to exert our own artificial downward pressure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darwin'sDisciple</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/are_we_missing_/#comment-48733</link>
		<dc:creator>Darwin'sDisciple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2006 18:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/05/are_we_missing_html/#comment-48733</guid>
		<description>&quot;While this is not strictly unethical, it can severely hurt our economy and alter the balance of power in international politics.&quot;

Anyone else as relieved as me that the price hikes on gasoline are not &quot;strictly unethical&quot;?

I know those corporations just hate it when there is even an appearance of ethical problems.

And if Shocker&#039;s predictions on the effect of the prices hold true, aren&#039;t you glad that no one in this administration will be willing to do anything about it.  &quot;Free enterprise&quot; don&#039;t ya know.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;While this is not strictly unethical, it can severely hurt our economy and alter the balance of power in international politics.&#8221;</p>
<p>Anyone else as relieved as me that the price hikes on gasoline are not &#8220;strictly unethical&#8221;?</p>
<p>I know those corporations just hate it when there is even an appearance of ethical problems.</p>
<p>And if Shocker&#8217;s predictions on the effect of the prices hold true, aren&#8217;t you glad that no one in this administration will be willing to do anything about it.  &#8220;Free enterprise&#8221; don&#8217;t ya know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shocker'07</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/are_we_missing_/#comment-48732</link>
		<dc:creator>Shocker'07</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2006 05:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/05/are_we_missing_html/#comment-48732</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not entirely convinced collusion is occurring in the oil industry, but I do believe they are ratcheting the price up until they find that point in which the price begins to affect demand.  While this is not strictly unethical, it can severely hurt our economy and alter the balance of power in international politics.  While the bureaucrats endlessly debate how to deal with this situation or send us rebate checks to make us think they are actually doing something, we can immediately drive down demand.  Tomorrow, sell our Hummers and buy a Honda.  Start walking to lunch instead of driving.  Arrange a carpool with your buddies at work.  Stop bending over and taking it from the oil companies and start doing something about this situation.

I would hate to be a victim of trolling, but Ed, you can&#039;t possibly be serious about Israel, right?  World War III would start the moment the US stopped backing Israel.  I guess demand would drop, though, as no one would be left on Earth to buy gas.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not entirely convinced collusion is occurring in the oil industry, but I do believe they are ratcheting the price up until they find that point in which the price begins to affect demand.  While this is not strictly unethical, it can severely hurt our economy and alter the balance of power in international politics.  While the bureaucrats endlessly debate how to deal with this situation or send us rebate checks to make us think they are actually doing something, we can immediately drive down demand.  Tomorrow, sell our Hummers and buy a Honda.  Start walking to lunch instead of driving.  Arrange a carpool with your buddies at work.  Stop bending over and taking it from the oil companies and start doing something about this situation.</p>
<p>I would hate to be a victim of trolling, but Ed, you can&#8217;t possibly be serious about Israel, right?  World War III would start the moment the US stopped backing Israel.  I guess demand would drop, though, as no one would be left on Earth to buy gas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heartlander</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/are_we_missing_/#comment-48731</link>
		<dc:creator>heartlander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2006 00:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/05/are_we_missing_html/#comment-48731</guid>
		<description>I went to Southwestern Colorado last June and traveled to a lot of places in Washington state last July.  Get out and about.  Get a personal reality check.  That&#039;s what I do.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went to Southwestern Colorado last June and traveled to a lot of places in Washington state last July.  Get out and about.  Get a personal reality check.  That&#8217;s what I do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heartlander</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/are_we_missing_/#comment-48730</link>
		<dc:creator>heartlander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2006 00:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/05/are_we_missing_html/#comment-48730</guid>
		<description>Hank, I&#039;ve been to California, Massachusetts and Florida in the last year (+).  They&#039;re doing better than this part of Kansas.  Disagree?  Travel to those states, and see.  I&#039;m serious.  I went to Florida last April, Massachusetts last June, and California last August.

I get out of Kansas a lot.  I need to get out and about, in order to maintain a larger-than-Kansas perspective and reality check.  At the end of this month, I&#039;m going to Utah, Nevada and Oregon. I was going to the Arkansas Ozarks, and canoe the Buffalo River, but some friends are going west, and they convinced me join them. Then in June, I&#039;m going to New England to attend my son&#039;s college graduation.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hank, I&#8217;ve been to California, Massachusetts and Florida in the last year (+).  They&#8217;re doing better than this part of Kansas.  Disagree?  Travel to those states, and see.  I&#8217;m serious.  I went to Florida last April, Massachusetts last June, and California last August.</p>
<p>I get out of Kansas a lot.  I need to get out and about, in order to maintain a larger-than-Kansas perspective and reality check.  At the end of this month, I&#8217;m going to Utah, Nevada and Oregon. I was going to the Arkansas Ozarks, and canoe the Buffalo River, but some friends are going west, and they convinced me join them. Then in June, I&#8217;m going to New England to attend my son&#8217;s college graduation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Williams</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/are_we_missing_/#comment-48729</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 23:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/05/are_we_missing_html/#comment-48729</guid>
		<description>Heartlander. Only specific pockets of Colorado, most notably Denver metro and ski resort towns, is going well and the same goes for Washington state.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heartlander. Only specific pockets of Colorado, most notably Denver metro and ski resort towns, is going well and the same goes for Washington state.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hank Price</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/are_we_missing_/#comment-48728</link>
		<dc:creator>Hank Price</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 21:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/05/are_we_missing_html/#comment-48728</guid>
		<description>California, Massachussetts, Florida
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>California, Massachussetts, Florida</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heartlander</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/are_we_missing_/#comment-48727</link>
		<dc:creator>heartlander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 21:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/05/are_we_missing_html/#comment-48727</guid>
		<description>Environmentalists aren&#039;t your enemies.  Colorado and Washington state are into environmentalism.  Their economies are doing a lot better than Kansas&#039;s.  Name one pro-environmental state whose economy is worse than Kansas&#039;s.

Wichita was named by the EPA in 2001 as having high levels of toxic pollutants in its air.  Wichita has really high lead levels in its water.  Now chart Wichita&#039;s per household income relative to the national average in 1970 vs. today.  Some of you apparently think pollution is good, because it correlates with falling income levels.  If that&#039;s what you want, you&#039;ll get what you want.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Environmentalists aren&#8217;t your enemies.  Colorado and Washington state are into environmentalism.  Their economies are doing a lot better than Kansas&#8217;s.  Name one pro-environmental state whose economy is worse than Kansas&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Wichita was named by the EPA in 2001 as having high levels of toxic pollutants in its air.  Wichita has really high lead levels in its water.  Now chart Wichita&#8217;s per household income relative to the national average in 1970 vs. today.  Some of you apparently think pollution is good, because it correlates with falling income levels.  If that&#8217;s what you want, you&#8217;ll get what you want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hank Price</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/are_we_missing_/#comment-48726</link>
		<dc:creator>Hank Price</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 20:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/05/are_we_missing_html/#comment-48726</guid>
		<description>Dear LeftHook,

Can you rocket pull a 6500lb horse trailor?

Hank
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear LeftHook,</p>
<p>Can you rocket pull a 6500lb horse trailor?</p>
<p>Hank</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hank Price</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/are_we_missing_/#comment-48725</link>
		<dc:creator>Hank Price</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 20:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/05/are_we_missing_html/#comment-48725</guid>
		<description>Dear LeftHook,

I&#039;ll take Allie, you get JR.

Hank
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear LeftHook,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll take Allie, you get JR.</p>
<p>Hank</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hank Price</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/are_we_missing_/#comment-48724</link>
		<dc:creator>Hank Price</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 20:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/05/are_we_missing_html/#comment-48724</guid>
		<description>Dear LeftHook,

I&#039;m not complaining about gasolene prices.  I own E/M. $1.37 a share quarterly profits.

My complaint is corrupt politicians and stupid constituents.

Hank

PS The analogy will work as soon as the environmentalist put so many restrictions on egg producers that we have to import 60% of our eggs at the same time preventing new chicken farms and buying more chicks.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear LeftHook,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not complaining about gasolene prices.  I own E/M. $1.37 a share quarterly profits.</p>
<p>My complaint is corrupt politicians and stupid constituents.</p>
<p>Hank</p>
<p>PS The analogy will work as soon as the environmentalist put so many restrictions on egg producers that we have to import 60% of our eggs at the same time preventing new chicken farms and buying more chicks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LeftHook</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/are_we_missing_/#comment-48723</link>
		<dc:creator>LeftHook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 20:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/05/are_we_missing_html/#comment-48723</guid>
		<description>Just re-read your post.  You&#039;ve got a motor home.

Ouch . . .
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just re-read your post.  You&#8217;ve got a motor home.</p>
<p>Ouch . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LeftHook</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/are_we_missing_/#comment-48722</link>
		<dc:creator>LeftHook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 20:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/05/are_we_missing_html/#comment-48722</guid>
		<description>Actually, Hank, I think that Julie is one of YOUR nimrods.  But you&#039;re right, it won&#039;t work--people will just buy less gas more frequently.

What will work is that since gas prices have gone up and stayed up, people will drive less, car-pool more, walk or bike more, and eventually buy more fuel efficient cars.

You don&#039;t need to buy a hybrid to get good mileage--just get a small anything.  We&#039;ve got a Honda Accord with the 6 cylinder engine and that thing is a rocket.  It nearly DOUBLED the mileage we got from our Ford Exploder.

Plus it looks like I&#039;ll be car-pooling to work soon.  Share a ride, and you&#039;ve doubled your gas mileage right there.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, Hank, I think that Julie is one of YOUR nimrods.  But you&#8217;re right, it won&#8217;t work&#8211;people will just buy less gas more frequently.</p>
<p>What will work is that since gas prices have gone up and stayed up, people will drive less, car-pool more, walk or bike more, and eventually buy more fuel efficient cars.</p>
<p>You don&#8217;t need to buy a hybrid to get good mileage&#8211;just get a small anything.  We&#8217;ve got a Honda Accord with the 6 cylinder engine and that thing is a rocket.  It nearly DOUBLED the mileage we got from our Ford Exploder.</p>
<p>Plus it looks like I&#8217;ll be car-pooling to work soon.  Share a ride, and you&#8217;ve doubled your gas mileage right there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hank Price</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/are_we_missing_/#comment-48721</link>
		<dc:creator>Hank Price</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 19:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/05/are_we_missing_html/#comment-48721</guid>
		<description>$10 each time you buy gas?  Wow, that&#039;ll work!  That means if you get half a tank your tank is only 7 gallons.  I call BS.

$10 will get my motor home 27 miles, 18 if I&#039;m pulling my horse trailor.  $10 will get my pickup 50 miles, 38 if I&#039;m pulling my horse trailor.

By not filling up you are in the station three or four times as much.  How much gas does that waste?

What a bunch of nimrods.

Hank
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>$10 each time you buy gas?  Wow, that&#8217;ll work!  That means if you get half a tank your tank is only 7 gallons.  I call BS.</p>
<p>$10 will get my motor home 27 miles, 18 if I&#8217;m pulling my horse trailor.  $10 will get my pickup 50 miles, 38 if I&#8217;m pulling my horse trailor.</p>
<p>By not filling up you are in the station three or four times as much.  How much gas does that waste?</p>
<p>What a bunch of nimrods.</p>
<p>Hank</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Friedemann</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/are_we_missing_/#comment-48720</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Friedemann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 19:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/05/are_we_missing_html/#comment-48720</guid>
		<description>If we cut the Zionists loose, the price will immedeatly fall to normal.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we cut the Zionists loose, the price will immedeatly fall to normal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Friedemann</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/are_we_missing_/#comment-48719</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Friedemann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 19:24:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/05/are_we_missing_html/#comment-48719</guid>
		<description>You won&#039;t need to worry about going to work because you won&#039;t have a job.

A Mexican will have it, if it still exists, for one tenth of what you were making.

And you get to learn what it&#039;s like to be homeless and poor.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You won&#8217;t need to worry about going to work because you won&#8217;t have a job.</p>
<p>A Mexican will have it, if it still exists, for one tenth of what you were making.</p>
<p>And you get to learn what it&#8217;s like to be homeless and poor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heartlander</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/are_we_missing_/#comment-48718</link>
		<dc:creator>heartlander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 19:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/05/are_we_missing_html/#comment-48718</guid>
		<description>High oil prices are not ALL bad.  Daniel Yergen recently stated in the WSJ that SEC reports&#039; &quot;proven reserve&quot; data is oil that can be produced at a current profit-making level, which is to say, when prices go up, more geologically proven reserves will be reported.   This includes shale oil in Colorado and Wyoming, deep offshore oil in the Gulf of Mexico, and tar-sand oil in Canada.

High oil prices also can make wind and solar energy production cost-effective.

High oil prices can also encourage more of us to carpool.  Heck, we can have more sociable interactions on our daily commutes.

High oil prices can encourage more of us to ride our bikes to work to save money.  It will reduce healthcare costs. It will not FATIGUE people, it will GIVE THEM MORE PERSONAL ENERGY.

You could redesign Central Avenue to single-lane car traffic in each direction, and convert the right-hand lanes to 10-foot-wide bike lanes.  With the completion of the Kellogg expressway, people who want to drive to work should take that route. (We could build a bike trail and bridge connecting Central over the Arkansas River.)

We can have more bus service.  Running on Kansas-produced natural gas.  We can build a light-rail system.  Smart societies figure out how to ADAPT to changing circumstances.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>High oil prices are not ALL bad.  Daniel Yergen recently stated in the WSJ that SEC reports&#8217; &#8220;proven reserve&#8221; data is oil that can be produced at a current profit-making level, which is to say, when prices go up, more geologically proven reserves will be reported.   This includes shale oil in Colorado and Wyoming, deep offshore oil in the Gulf of Mexico, and tar-sand oil in Canada.</p>
<p>High oil prices also can make wind and solar energy production cost-effective.</p>
<p>High oil prices can also encourage more of us to carpool.  Heck, we can have more sociable interactions on our daily commutes.</p>
<p>High oil prices can encourage more of us to ride our bikes to work to save money.  It will reduce healthcare costs. It will not FATIGUE people, it will GIVE THEM MORE PERSONAL ENERGY.</p>
<p>You could redesign Central Avenue to single-lane car traffic in each direction, and convert the right-hand lanes to 10-foot-wide bike lanes.  With the completion of the Kellogg expressway, people who want to drive to work should take that route. (We could build a bike trail and bridge connecting Central over the Arkansas River.)</p>
<p>We can have more bus service.  Running on Kansas-produced natural gas.  We can build a light-rail system.  Smart societies figure out how to ADAPT to changing circumstances.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RD</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/are_we_missing_/#comment-48717</link>
		<dc:creator>RD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 19:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/05/are_we_missing_html/#comment-48717</guid>
		<description>Julie, I already buy gas in $10 increments.  I don&#039;t do a lot of driving and try to keep it as much to the minimum as possible.  I did fill my tank once, sometime last month, and nearly passed out at the total, so I&#039;m back to the $10-at-a-time ritual.  Like you, that gets me just under a half tank.  It&#039;s definitely doable.

I&#039;d also love to boycott ExxonMobile, but I&#039;m not sure where places like QuikTrip get their gas.  Anyone know?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Julie, I already buy gas in $10 increments.  I don&#8217;t do a lot of driving and try to keep it as much to the minimum as possible.  I did fill my tank once, sometime last month, and nearly passed out at the total, so I&#8217;m back to the $10-at-a-time ritual.  Like you, that gets me just under a half tank.  It&#8217;s definitely doable.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d also love to boycott ExxonMobile, but I&#8217;m not sure where places like QuikTrip get their gas.  Anyone know?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KansasClassicLiberal</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/are_we_missing_/#comment-48716</link>
		<dc:creator>KansasClassicLiberal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 19:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/05/are_we_missing_html/#comment-48716</guid>
		<description>Julie, with regard to your story, if the man still eats two eggs a day (and everyone else does, too), the demand for eggs is unchanged. What has changed is that customers buy eggs every day instead of once a week. That raises transaction costs for buyers and sellers of eggs.

There may be some period of declining demand as people change their habits from buying weekly to buying daily. But when people resume buying weekly, there will be a corresponding short period of increased demand.

Even if this scheme did work, once people resumed buying eggs a dozen or two at a time, aren&#039;t the same factors still in place as before?

Or if schemes like this do work, shouldn&#039;t we try it again, thereby lowering the costs of eggs even more?

Same thing with gasoline. As long as everyone buys the same number of gallons, overall gasoline demand is unchanged. But everyone has to go to the filling station more frequently. For people who value their time, this has a cost.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Julie, with regard to your story, if the man still eats two eggs a day (and everyone else does, too), the demand for eggs is unchanged. What has changed is that customers buy eggs every day instead of once a week. That raises transaction costs for buyers and sellers of eggs.</p>
<p>There may be some period of declining demand as people change their habits from buying weekly to buying daily. But when people resume buying weekly, there will be a corresponding short period of increased demand.</p>
<p>Even if this scheme did work, once people resumed buying eggs a dozen or two at a time, aren&#8217;t the same factors still in place as before?</p>
<p>Or if schemes like this do work, shouldn&#8217;t we try it again, thereby lowering the costs of eggs even more?</p>
<p>Same thing with gasoline. As long as everyone buys the same number of gallons, overall gasoline demand is unchanged. But everyone has to go to the filling station more frequently. For people who value their time, this has a cost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Friedemann</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/are_we_missing_/#comment-48715</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Friedemann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 19:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/05/are_we_missing_html/#comment-48715</guid>
		<description>The Zionists nuked the egg farm.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Zionists nuked the egg farm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Friedemann</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/are_we_missing_/#comment-48714</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Friedemann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 18:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/05/are_we_missing_html/#comment-48714</guid>
		<description>Gee, If you tax gasoline, that makes it cost more money. Wow, what a plan. Why don&#039;t you Zionists put Charles Krauthammer in as the head of the department of gasoline.

He has a calculator and no brain. Just what you need { and he&#039;s aready a Zionist }.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee, If you tax gasoline, that makes it cost more money. Wow, what a plan. Why don&#8217;t you Zionists put Charles Krauthammer in as the head of the department of gasoline.</p>
<p>He has a calculator and no brain. Just what you need { and he&#8217;s aready a Zionist }.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heartlander</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/are_we_missing_/#comment-48713</link>
		<dc:creator>heartlander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 18:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/05/are_we_missing_html/#comment-48713</guid>
		<description>But if you bought oil futures, you could have made a LOT of money.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But if you bought oil futures, you could have made a LOT of money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darwin'sDisciple</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/05/are_we_missing_/#comment-48712</link>
		<dc:creator>Darwin'sDisciple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 18:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/05/are_we_missing_html/#comment-48712</guid>
		<description>Heartlander is on to something with the &quot;rocket &amp; feather&quot; theory.  It is not known if it actually exists or not.  Here is a 2003 article describing the theory (in it they complain about $2.27 per gallon gas - that&#039;s laughable, now).

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2003/03/16/BU143458.DTL&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2003/03/16/BU143458.DTL&lt;/a&gt;

Another issue about the burden of gas prices on the middle class - gas spending is a relatively non-elastic expense.  I could easily resort to buying two eggs, but it takes a little more time to move closer to my workplace, re-tool with a hybrid car, etc, etc, - hopefully you get the point.

I recall reading that when gas prices reach $2 per gallon, consumption is cut into significantly enough that it was not in the interests of oil companies to have the price that high.  That little bit of wisdom, if it was ever true, is not true now.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heartlander is on to something with the &#8220;rocket &amp; feather&#8221; theory.  It is not known if it actually exists or not.  Here is a 2003 article describing the theory (in it they complain about $2.27 per gallon gas &#8211; that&#8217;s laughable, now).</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2003/03/16/BU143458.DTL" rel="nofollow">http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2003/03/16/BU143458.DTL</a></p>
<p>Another issue about the burden of gas prices on the middle class &#8211; gas spending is a relatively non-elastic expense.  I could easily resort to buying two eggs, but it takes a little more time to move closer to my workplace, re-tool with a hybrid car, etc, etc, &#8211; hopefully you get the point.</p>
<p>I recall reading that when gas prices reach $2 per gallon, consumption is cut into significantly enough that it was not in the interests of oil companies to have the price that high.  That little bit of wisdom, if it was ever true, is not true now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
