<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should the U.S. come to the table with Iran?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/04/should_the_us_c/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/04/should_the_us_c/</link>
	<description>The Wichita Eagle Editorial Department Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 07:57:13 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: LeftHook</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/04/should_the_us_c/#comment-37695</link>
		<dc:creator>LeftHook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 21:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/04/should_the_us_chtml/#comment-37695</guid>
		<description>So nice, we posted it twice.

No harm, no foul.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So nice, we posted it twice.</p>
<p>No harm, no foul.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RD</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/04/should_the_us_c/#comment-37694</link>
		<dc:creator>RD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 00:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/04/should_the_us_chtml/#comment-37694</guid>
		<description>Sorry, to repost LeftHook&#039;s link.  I scrolled through to see if there was a link before I posted, and I missed it.  My apologies to everyone, especially LH.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, to repost LeftHook&#8217;s link.  I scrolled through to see if there was a link before I posted, and I missed it.  My apologies to everyone, especially LH.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RD</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/04/should_the_us_c/#comment-37693</link>
		<dc:creator>RD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 00:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/04/should_the_us_chtml/#comment-37693</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rollingstone.com/news/profile/story/9961300/the_worst_president_in_history?rnd=1145575772312&amp;has-player=true&amp;version=6.0.12.857&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.rollingstone.com/news/profile/story/9961300/the_worst_president_in_history?rnd=1145575772312&amp;has-player=true&amp;version=6.0.12.857&lt;/a&gt;

(Stupid mouse button...)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.rollingstone.com/news/profile/story/9961300/the_worst_president_in_history?rnd=1145575772312&amp;has-player=true&amp;version=6.0.12.857" rel="nofollow">http://www.rollingstone.com/news/profile/story/9961300/the_worst_president_in_history?rnd=1145575772312&amp;has-player=true&amp;version=6.0.12.857</a></p>
<p>(Stupid mouse button&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RD</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/04/should_the_us_c/#comment-37692</link>
		<dc:creator>RD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 00:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/04/should_the_us_chtml/#comment-37692</guid>
		<description>The Worst President in History? -- Rolling Stone Magazine

Worth the long read.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Worst President in History? &#8212; Rolling Stone Magazine</p>
<p>Worth the long read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gster</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/04/should_the_us_c/#comment-37691</link>
		<dc:creator>gster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 21:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/04/should_the_us_chtml/#comment-37691</guid>
		<description>KFG- I this the correct term is &quot;preznut&quot;, or maybe  poncho-boy.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KFG- I this the correct term is &#8220;preznut&#8221;, or maybe  poncho-boy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ksfarmgrrl</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/04/should_the_us_c/#comment-37690</link>
		<dc:creator>ksfarmgrrl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 18:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/04/should_the_us_chtml/#comment-37690</guid>
		<description>&quot;how many times will he step on his poncho&quot;

&quot;crappy president gene&quot;

&quot;crappy president environment&quot; - TEXAS&quot;

I declare co-winners!!!

If only Ann Richards had REALLY wanted to be gov for a second term...

We could have had President Richards instead of Preznit Shrub.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;how many times will he step on his poncho&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;crappy president gene&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;crappy president environment&#8221; &#8211; TEXAS&#8221;</p>
<p>I declare co-winners!!!</p>
<p>If only Ann Richards had REALLY wanted to be gov for a second term&#8230;</p>
<p>We could have had President Richards instead of Preznit Shrub.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Huie</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/04/should_the_us_c/#comment-37689</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Huie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 18:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/04/should_the_us_chtml/#comment-37689</guid>
		<description>Coupled with &quot;crappy president environment&quot; - TEXAS
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coupled with &#8220;crappy president environment&#8221; &#8211; TEXAS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Friedemann</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/04/should_the_us_c/#comment-37688</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Friedemann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 18:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/04/should_the_us_chtml/#comment-37688</guid>
		<description>DD, You win the prize: &quot;crappy president gene&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DD, You win the prize: &#8220;crappy president gene&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Huie</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/04/should_the_us_c/#comment-37687</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Huie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 17:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/04/should_the_us_chtml/#comment-37687</guid>
		<description>My nominee to share &quot;co-worst&quot; with Bush:  fellow Texan LBJ!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My nominee to share &#8220;co-worst&#8221; with Bush:  fellow Texan LBJ!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Friedemann</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/04/should_the_us_c/#comment-37686</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Friedemann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 17:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/04/should_the_us_chtml/#comment-37686</guid>
		<description>Even the Jewishnesses are starting to sweat. Bush scares everybody. How about &quot;A war on scarerers and deciders.&quot;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.forward.com/issues/2003/03.12.26/news5.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.forward.com/issues/2003/03.12.26/news5.html&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even the Jewishnesses are starting to sweat. Bush scares everybody. How about &#8220;A war on scarerers and deciders.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.forward.com/issues/2003/03.12.26/news5.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.forward.com/issues/2003/03.12.26/news5.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gster</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/04/should_the_us_c/#comment-37685</link>
		<dc:creator>gster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 16:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/04/should_the_us_chtml/#comment-37685</guid>
		<description>The really scarey thing,during the rest of his term ( or our sentence),is how many times will he step on his poncho. And at what price and consequence?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The really scarey thing,during the rest of his term ( or our sentence),is how many times will he step on his poncho. And at what price and consequence?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ksfarmgrrl</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/04/should_the_us_c/#comment-37684</link>
		<dc:creator>ksfarmgrrl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 16:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/04/should_the_us_chtml/#comment-37684</guid>
		<description>&quot;a cataclysmic event on the order of the terrorist attacks of September 11th, after which the public might rally around the White House once again&quot;

Dammit y&#039;all, dont give them any ideas...

I hear ossama getting out the video cam even as we speak. Can you say &quot;red&quot; alert right before the elections?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;a cataclysmic event on the order of the terrorist attacks of September 11th, after which the public might rally around the White House once again&#8221;</p>
<p>Dammit y&#8217;all, dont give them any ideas&#8230;</p>
<p>I hear ossama getting out the video cam even as we speak. Can you say &#8220;red&#8221; alert right before the elections?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darwin'sDisciple</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/04/should_the_us_c/#comment-37683</link>
		<dc:creator>Darwin'sDisciple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 16:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/04/should_the_us_chtml/#comment-37683</guid>
		<description>LH,

The RS article is very good.

My favorite paragraph (so far):

&quot;Calamitous presidents, faced with enormous difficulties -- Buchanan, Andrew Johnson, Hoover and now Bush -- have divided the nation, governed erratically and left the nation worse off. In each case, different factors contributed to the failure: disastrous domestic policies, foreign-policy blunders and military setbacks, executive misconduct, crises of credibility and public trust. Bush, however, is one of the rarities in presidential history: He has not only stumbled badly in every one of these key areas, he has also displayed a weakness common among the greatest presidential failures -- an unswerving adherence to a simplistic ideology that abjures deviation from dogma as heresy, thus preventing any pragmatic adjustment to changing realities. Repeatedly, Bush has undone himself, a failing revealed in each major area of presidential performance.&quot;

I have never seen anyone say it better and more clearly than that.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LH,</p>
<p>The RS article is very good.</p>
<p>My favorite paragraph (so far):</p>
<p>&#8220;Calamitous presidents, faced with enormous difficulties &#8212; Buchanan, Andrew Johnson, Hoover and now Bush &#8212; have divided the nation, governed erratically and left the nation worse off. In each case, different factors contributed to the failure: disastrous domestic policies, foreign-policy blunders and military setbacks, executive misconduct, crises of credibility and public trust. Bush, however, is one of the rarities in presidential history: He has not only stumbled badly in every one of these key areas, he has also displayed a weakness common among the greatest presidential failures &#8212; an unswerving adherence to a simplistic ideology that abjures deviation from dogma as heresy, thus preventing any pragmatic adjustment to changing realities. Repeatedly, Bush has undone himself, a failing revealed in each major area of presidential performance.&#8221;</p>
<p>I have never seen anyone say it better and more clearly than that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darwin'sDisciple</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/04/should_the_us_c/#comment-37682</link>
		<dc:creator>Darwin'sDisciple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 16:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/04/should_the_us_chtml/#comment-37682</guid>
		<description>LH,Historians usually consider Franklin Pierce (1853-1859) as the &quot;worst president ever&quot;.

Guess who is a descendent of FP?That&#039;s right, George W. Bush (from his mother&#039;s side).

GW inherited the crappy president gene.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LH,Historians usually consider Franklin Pierce (1853-1859) as the &#8220;worst president ever&#8221;.</p>
<p>Guess who is a descendent of FP?That&#8217;s right, George W. Bush (from his mother&#8217;s side).</p>
<p>GW inherited the crappy president gene.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LeftHook</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/04/should_the_us_c/#comment-37681</link>
		<dc:creator>LeftHook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 16:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/04/should_the_us_chtml/#comment-37681</guid>
		<description>Cover story of the latest Rolling Stone magazine:

&quot;George W. Bush&#039;s presidency appears headed for colossal historical disgrace. Barring a cataclysmic event on the order of the terrorist attacks of September 11th, after which the public might rally around the White House once again, there seems to be little the administration can do to avoid being ranked on the lowest tier of U.S. presidents. And that may be the best-case scenario. Many historians are now wondering whether Bush, in fact, will be remembered as the very worst president in all of American history.&quot;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rollingstone.com/news/profile/story/9961300/the_worst_president_in_history?rnd=1145468541266&amp;has-player=true&amp;version=6.0.8.1024&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.rollingstone.com/news/profile/story/9961300/the_worst_president_in_history?rnd=1145468541266&amp;has-player=true&amp;version=6.0.8.1024&lt;/a&gt;

Yup, it&#039;s what I&#039;ve been saying from day one-- Worst. President. Ever.

In fact he may be the Worst. President. Possible.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cover story of the latest Rolling Stone magazine:</p>
<p>&#8220;George W. Bush&#8217;s presidency appears headed for colossal historical disgrace. Barring a cataclysmic event on the order of the terrorist attacks of September 11th, after which the public might rally around the White House once again, there seems to be little the administration can do to avoid being ranked on the lowest tier of U.S. presidents. And that may be the best-case scenario. Many historians are now wondering whether Bush, in fact, will be remembered as the very worst president in all of American history.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rollingstone.com/news/profile/story/9961300/the_worst_president_in_history?rnd=1145468541266&amp;has-player=true&amp;version=6.0.8.1024" rel="nofollow">http://www.rollingstone.com/news/profile/story/9961300/the_worst_president_in_history?rnd=1145468541266&amp;has-player=true&amp;version=6.0.8.1024</a></p>
<p>Yup, it&#8217;s what I&#8217;ve been saying from day one&#8211; Worst. President. Ever.</p>
<p>In fact he may be the Worst. President. Possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J R</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/04/should_the_us_c/#comment-37680</link>
		<dc:creator>J R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 15:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/04/should_the_us_chtml/#comment-37680</guid>
		<description>Should the U.S. come to the table?

The better question would be should Iran come to the table.Given the past history of the U.S. in that region and elsewhere, if I were Iran I&#039;d be using the table for a barrricade and arming for self preservation.

Which is pretty much what is happening.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should the U.S. come to the table?</p>
<p>The better question would be should Iran come to the table.Given the past history of the U.S. in that region and elsewhere, if I were Iran I&#8217;d be using the table for a barrricade and arming for self preservation.</p>
<p>Which is pretty much what is happening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darwin'sDisciple</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/04/should_the_us_c/#comment-37679</link>
		<dc:creator>Darwin'sDisciple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 15:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/04/should_the_us_chtml/#comment-37679</guid>
		<description>Did the sanctions against Iraq work perfectly? No.

Was Saddam eating less because of the sanctions?  No.

Did the sanctions unfairly punish innocent Iraqis.  Yes.  (I am betting the average Iraqi would prefer living under sanctions rather than under U.S. occupation and civil war).

Did the sanctions against Iraq prevent them from developing WMD?  Something(s) prevented it.  I think Sanctions played a big part.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did the sanctions against Iraq work perfectly? No.</p>
<p>Was Saddam eating less because of the sanctions?  No.</p>
<p>Did the sanctions unfairly punish innocent Iraqis.  Yes.  (I am betting the average Iraqi would prefer living under sanctions rather than under U.S. occupation and civil war).</p>
<p>Did the sanctions against Iraq prevent them from developing WMD?  Something(s) prevented it.  I think Sanctions played a big part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ksfarmgrrl</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/04/should_the_us_c/#comment-37678</link>
		<dc:creator>ksfarmgrrl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 14:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/04/should_the_us_chtml/#comment-37678</guid>
		<description>Juiced for war? As usual, the rude pundit has the definitive take on the &quot;war fever swamp&quot;. Scroll to the &quot;mainlining&quot; post.

And also as usual, his take is both profound and profane, so if you cant take rude words, dont click.

But if you can enjoy a little rude humor with the truth...

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rudepundit.blogspot.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.rudepundit.blogspot.com/&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Juiced for war? As usual, the rude pundit has the definitive take on the &#8220;war fever swamp&#8221;. Scroll to the &#8220;mainlining&#8221; post.</p>
<p>And also as usual, his take is both profound and profane, so if you cant take rude words, dont click.</p>
<p>But if you can enjoy a little rude humor with the truth&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rudepundit.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.rudepundit.blogspot.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ksfarmgrrl</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/04/should_the_us_c/#comment-37677</link>
		<dc:creator>ksfarmgrrl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 14:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/04/should_the_us_chtml/#comment-37677</guid>
		<description>Ben, we also armed them at one point just like we did iraq. We have been saying &quot;let&#039;s you and them fight&quot; to both iraq and iran for years.

And then we are surprised when they bristle with weapons, both real (iran) and imagined (iraq)?

I agree, with the war drums pounding in the u.s., no one is the world is feeling very safe right now.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben, we also armed them at one point just like we did iraq. We have been saying &#8220;let&#8217;s you and them fight&#8221; to both iraq and iran for years.</p>
<p>And then we are surprised when they bristle with weapons, both real (iran) and imagined (iraq)?</p>
<p>I agree, with the war drums pounding in the u.s., no one is the world is feeling very safe right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Huie</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/04/should_the_us_c/#comment-37676</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Huie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 14:53:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/04/should_the_us_chtml/#comment-37676</guid>
		<description>kfg - in the case of Iran we are threatening after helping ATTACK them.  No wonedr they want the capability to defend themselves.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kfg &#8211; in the case of Iran we are threatening after helping ATTACK them.  No wonedr they want the capability to defend themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/04/should_the_us_c/#comment-37675</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 14:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/04/should_the_us_chtml/#comment-37675</guid>
		<description>As General Zinni said on &quot;Meet the Press&quot; a few weeks ago (to paraphrase)

Sanctions were indeed working. If you think they weren&#039;t then you either think that the military assigned to the overflights and naval duty, etc. were completely incompetent, or you dishonor them by presenting misinformation about their decade long (and successful) efforts to enforce the embargo and sanctions.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As General Zinni said on &#8220;Meet the Press&#8221; a few weeks ago (to paraphrase)</p>
<p>Sanctions were indeed working. If you think they weren&#8217;t then you either think that the military assigned to the overflights and naval duty, etc. were completely incompetent, or you dishonor them by presenting misinformation about their decade long (and successful) efforts to enforce the embargo and sanctions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ksfarmgrrl</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/04/should_the_us_c/#comment-37674</link>
		<dc:creator>ksfarmgrrl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 14:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/04/should_the_us_chtml/#comment-37674</guid>
		<description>We are threatening iran after arming them previously? We invaded iraq after arming saddam previously? The economic sanctions were working but we went to war anyway?

We would be there, according to rummy, six days, six weeks, but certainly not six months? And we have been there three years with no end in sight? Is that called &quot;rolling through iraq&quot; and defeating saddam in 21 days?

More bushco lies. Black is white and up is down and by god, if the preznit says it, it must be true.

That thinking is how we got here. Much like the queen said to Alice, to keep bushco in power the american people must believe six impossible things before breakfast. I wonder what is on the menue today...

Freedom fries anyone?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are threatening iran after arming them previously? We invaded iraq after arming saddam previously? The economic sanctions were working but we went to war anyway?</p>
<p>We would be there, according to rummy, six days, six weeks, but certainly not six months? And we have been there three years with no end in sight? Is that called &#8220;rolling through iraq&#8221; and defeating saddam in 21 days?</p>
<p>More bushco lies. Black is white and up is down and by god, if the preznit says it, it must be true.</p>
<p>That thinking is how we got here. Much like the queen said to Alice, to keep bushco in power the american people must believe six impossible things before breakfast. I wonder what is on the menue today&#8230;</p>
<p>Freedom fries anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ksfarmgrrl</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/04/should_the_us_c/#comment-37673</link>
		<dc:creator>ksfarmgrrl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 14:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/04/should_the_us_chtml/#comment-37673</guid>
		<description>Do you have proof that the economic sanctions against iraq did not work? Like a link or a story?

I think the preznit and his buddies were so juiced for war with iraq that even if the sanctions were working, they would have said they were not and went to war anyway.

Maybe the sanctions did work since we found no WMDs in iraq. I&#039;d say that worked better than what we are doing now.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you have proof that the economic sanctions against iraq did not work? Like a link or a story?</p>
<p>I think the preznit and his buddies were so juiced for war with iraq that even if the sanctions were working, they would have said they were not and went to war anyway.</p>
<p>Maybe the sanctions did work since we found no WMDs in iraq. I&#8217;d say that worked better than what we are doing now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Huie</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/04/should_the_us_c/#comment-37672</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Huie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 14:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/04/should_the_us_chtml/#comment-37672</guid>
		<description>Joe makes a good point - Bush seems determined to mire the US in another war.  Threatening to nuke Iran after having helped attack Iran in the 80s is hardly the way to make Iran want to be defenseless.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe makes a good point &#8211; Bush seems determined to mire the US in another war.  Threatening to nuke Iran after having helped attack Iran in the 80s is hardly the way to make Iran want to be defenseless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: XXX</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/04/should_the_us_c/#comment-37671</link>
		<dc:creator>XXX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 13:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/04/should_the_us_chtml/#comment-37671</guid>
		<description>Well of course we should be at the barganing table with Iran. But I&#039;ll bet it doesn&#039;t happen. Look for Bush to start a war timed to influence the November elections. If he does that, we need to move beyond impeachment and try him as a war criminal.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well of course we should be at the barganing table with Iran. But I&#8217;ll bet it doesn&#8217;t happen. Look for Bush to start a war timed to influence the November elections. If he does that, we need to move beyond impeachment and try him as a war criminal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
