Christian radio psychologist and political activist James Dobson has been taking heat from some on the religious right for his support of a legislative bill in Colorado to create “reciprocal beneficiary agreements.” These agreements would enable people who aren’t allowed to marry to make decisions about medical care and end-of-life decisions. It would also give them hospital visitation rights, extend domestic violence protections and provide inheritance and property rights. Dobson argues this is an issue of fairness and that the measure is sexual-orientation neutral — noting that it could apply to two elderly sisters who live together. It’s an interesting legal and political debate.
There are some conservatives who argue that the agreements are strategically smart because they take away many of the arguments for allowing gay marriage or civil unions. But opponents contend that the agreements can also become evidence of a legislative intent to value gay couples, which could then be used in court to push for additional rights. There’s also some concern, as there has been by conservatives about civil unions, that the institution of marriage might be weakened if heterosexual couples can get most of the legal benefits of marriage without having to be legally married.
Posted by Phillip Brownlee
-
Registered?
Commenting on WE Blog now requires you to be a Kansas.com member. Use the links above to register, if you haven't already, or to log in. -
Contact us
Daily Archives
-
Recent Comments
- beber on Clinton endorsement should end political soap opera
- biased1 on Obama’s mile-high expectations
- CapnAmerica on Obama’s mile-high expectations
- outlander on Open thread 8/28
- CapnAmerica on Obama’s mile-high expectations
- cosmos_originally on Open thread 8/28
- SolDevVB on Open thread 8/28
- StevenEDavis on Open thread 8/28
- GMC70 on Obama’s mile-high expectations
- bth on Is McCain overusing the ‘POW card’?